HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance (553) Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? NO
(If Corporation, submit a list of officers. If Co-partnership, submit a list of owners) .
Is the applicant owner, 'lessee, or prospective tenant? NO
Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? No
(If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property
in question) .
Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? NO
State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application
and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if
necessary) .
arc r..t-questing i-0r a yarzi ''6 to ball 3 leek +-4.at ,._ ..._.. a_ ._8 , -Ovff
over the 50 ' building line . The reason is the far most section of
the house Fast ( the back yard) is only 2 ' -0" away from the building
line and the owners would like to make an addition to the deck and
so there fore it would go over the building line .
Dated thisZday of L Year Z Telephone I
APPLICANT:
(Signature)
OWNER:
(Signature)
ACTION OF THE BOARD
GRANTEDtY i 1yga DENIED
.� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . I . . . .;L . . . .`Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
May 11 , 1992
Mr . Bradley Fox
209 Pleasant Valley Road
South Windsor , CT 06074
RE: ZBA Application #2047-92 : Bradley J. Fox
30 Haystack Lane
Dear Mr . Fox :
At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on May 7 ,
1992 , a variance was granted to Section 10 . 2 of the Zoning
Regulations to allow an 8 foot variance to place a deck 42 feet.
from rear yard ( 50 feet required) on property located at 30
Haystack Lane (RR Zone) .
The hardship placed with this appeal is due to the pie shaped lot
and because the construction of the deck is a minimal intrusion
with plenty of land behind the lot .
This action is effective May 7 , 1992 and upon your filing of the
enclosed form in the Town Clerk ' s office at your own expense.
Very truly yours ,
Robert W. Warren, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
RWW/asb
Enclosure
GARDNER >st PETERSON ASSOCIATES'''""'Re HmTFORD nPAME TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT 06W
—. OPE1�l SPACE To ��'
���.17�p �o 'TOwIV n'G' �v'CN W 1tJflSOFZ
v
M
•K? 32.$' 4'S ,•.t1
a
kid
pe
�02
4
0 �
P EMT. �,. 5594' R'S2• ah
�O CI..� �' �,�'38'•p�� lr -DFZ\YEWA`l ESMT
V61F, I AT \v
Q s 19�_1l•.30..
\A A�!STA GK
1
CA"CV
BAN E
LOCATION PLAN NOTICE
LOT #10 - ABBE ROAD ESTATES Reproductions of this plan are invalid if they -10
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, 00NNECTICUT not bear the impression seal of the undersigns
SCAM: l" = 40' Land Survevor and/or Professional Engineer.
I hereby declare that the location of the building as shown is substantially correct
and that there are no zoning violations of the same.
Driveway Location is Proposed
CLASS A-2
D � t , 1987
4L.S. #10839
REFERENCE: Subdivision Plan Abbe Road Estates in South Windsor, CL'a�e'1�17/15
necicut
Gardner & Peterson Associates Tolland, Connecticut Scale 1" = 40
Revisions 3-31-86 7-18-86 6-16-87
y;j
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
LAND SURVEYORS �E