The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVariance (516) APPLICATION FOR R ED Application t TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR WY g Is91 Date ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL %. WlNgsuR P Recei t��1l�lll�� d�Pfi� ' s IMPORTANT: This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the se w Friday of the Preceding month to insure being heard at the next meeting. ALL ITEES EAST BE ANSWERED AND ALL SQPPLEEE M EAST BE SM MITTED. THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED IF INCOMPLETE. - The application and supplements must be filed in duplicate. - The application must be typewritten or printed in ink. - A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application showing streets, lot lines, building lines, zone boundary lines, dimensions, and buildings present or proposed, and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from bject property. - If a • riance is being requestcYi, . legal description of the property must be submitted with t.:e application. This description can be obtained from mortgage records. - The sign from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets. - The applicant, or a representative, must be present for the public hearing. The time, date and place of the hearing will be advised by mail. - Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department at the South Windsor Town Hall. APPLICANT: �v��,��=c 7��, 7 ,[_ l r'N ?p% 'i'�%;' 6V 7✓'/q•v.si'< . F 7�c; MAILING ADDRESSS%��Ci� T (L/ G-) U� O/ OWNER OF RECORD OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION �S L �3 i�i �'" ��TL C! 1�7 T AZ LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (/�/ S <i:>/N �,t,✓ t :' ,�';f %`i c/^� ZONE OF PROPERTY IN QIIESTION -�� ':-i"/4 �'u i;/t<. CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWINGS Request Variance to Section of the Zoning Regulations to allow or state hearing under Section of the General Statutes for or temporary and conditional permit for or an appeal from the Zoning Officer's decision involving_ Is applicant a corporation or cc,-partnership? 76V.Gi?N/%1fiv>/�Ic 6iV;04n1N',vG A'No12i7-Y (If Corporation, submit a list of officers. If Co-partnership, submit a list of owaers) . Is the applicant owner, lessee, or prospective tenant? /V v Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? A10 (If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property in question) . Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? /U"o State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary) . /r (�yt�Fi? C�N�✓ CT�.,Ic,-��► c �7i87v"� ' �/ -?!� /=/IiC u�� 7o &,,2'4"V,r %vovi0 2.C5Ut_ 7' /N TNr- 7-0T1qz- AC Gov SJ7-/d.v CU!3 32Ur Ty 7r�UX 04;,yyIIV(7- 72r_--- 0W1VC1,YT) U Aivio 0ccU/-A/yC Nd I-'_11 vL-7- D6 7/9F_/2 7i! Dated this _day of 14'14,A Year .1991 Telephone # 25& 3352 APPLICANT: //�� /1�--�' /VJIC/li�EL L. lt,J112 Z; -A&,('niT CosUN -AP 0- 7- (Signature) OWNER: /dL S S'F_/ ,Eki�i�/TJ / 410 (Signature) ACTION OF THE BOARD G((o(91 CG�RANTED DENIED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :�.". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •��. . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fx�;V;:' PINNEY, PAYNE, VAN LENTEN, BURRELL. WOLFE b OILLMAN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW A SCARLL IINNCY 25 WEST STREET oDmer3.►ArNL- NEW MILrORD OrrICC THOMAS W.V. LENTEN POST OFFICE BOX 6.5E 40 MAIN STREET HucH A,TURRCLL DANBURY, CONNECTICU7 06810 NCW MILrORD.COHNEC7ICUT 06776 NC,.e EI1TJ WOLrC I2(331355.1,8, .:Q IN.DILL— (203)7AO.2721 ' WIL LIAM S.STLCL L,JR. I,IOGErICLO Orr CL J ErrRCY 9.SICNI(IC WIC: AI)I MAIN 31 PC CT tc:)D.encKCR•• RIOGCrIELD,COHNCCT ICUT 06077 IZO 31•.fie ]72a JAME.5 H.MALONEY C O L H S E L N IC HnCL S.MCKCHNA THOMAS L.CHENEY ALrRED P.rO RING Nancy R. S ienkiewicz ALSO ADMITTED IN vA January 24 1986 !'LEASE REPLY TO NOw Milford •'ALSO AOMIT TEE)IN O.C.AND NY George R. Sullivan , Jr . , Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of New Milford 24 Church Street New Milford, Ct . 06776 RD : Notification of Property Owners of Variable Application by DOT Dear Mr . Sullivan :. I have researched the issue of whether property owners whose land is to be condemned by a state agency must consent to the agency' s application for a variance . The answer is clearly, no . Section 48-24 of the General Statutes gives the condemning authority the power to obtain a variance for the portion of property which will remain after the taking . In Smith v . Zonine Board of Appeals , 174 Conn . 323 ( 1978 ) , where the p_aintztf property owners were neither notified of nor consented to the application for a variance , the Connecticut Supreme Court stated : The remaining issue in this appeal is the Plaintiff ' s claim that the granting of a variance without their consent violates their constitutional right to just compensation by forcing them to assume the financial risk of structural alteration or sale of property subject to a variance . We disagree . The Plaintiffs ' claims for consequential damages to the remaining land resulting from the partial taking could be considered by a trier of fact under General Statutes Section 13a-76 . Damages .wou'd be calculated by subtracting the Q--an 1�ittflit GF� JOSEPH 1. LIEBERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL OFCONN (Offirc of lrcAttarnen 0cmral 57 BRAINARD ROAD HARTFORD, CT 06114 T`lephone : 566-2257 February 28 , 1986 Douglas M. Hummel Assistant Property Agent Office of Rights of Way Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield , CT 06109 Dear Mr . Hummel : With reference to our conversation concerning Conn . Gen . Stat . s 48-24 as of this date I have examined an opinion letter dated January 24 , 1986 by the law firm of Pinney, Payne , Van Lenten , Burrell , Wolfe & Dillman , P.C. addressed to the chairman of the New Milford Zoning Board of Appeals . Please be informed that I am completely in agreement with said opinion. Very truly yours , JOSEPH I . LIEBERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL v Paige Everin Assistant Attorney General PE: rw f ` P1';r1EY, PHYNENAN LENTEN. BURRELL.WOLFS 6-DILLMAN. P. C. George R. Sullivan , Jr . —2— January 23 , 1986 market value of the remainder after the taking from the market value of the property just prior to the taking . Laurel , Inc . v . State , 169 Conn . 195 , 205 , 362 A. Meriden V . Highway Commissioner , 169 Conn . 655' , fib, A. d . 1094 . Mr . Douglas Hummel of the Department of Transportation plans to notify the record owners. of the property to be condemned for the Lower Grove Street connection of the variance applications by certified mail . This method of notification is obviously sufficient . The Board should consider the variance applications submitted by the Department of Transportation under these circumstances . c, ,.i . Jeffrey B . Sienkiewicz New Milford Town Counsel By Nancy R. Sien iewicz NZ/1 c o Douglas Hummel TOWN OF'SOUTH WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Receivedfrom --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- of ---- - - -- - ------------ Dollars fee for a hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. This hearing is to cover application number -----------_--------------------for---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated at South Windsor, Conn., this------------------------ day of--------------------------------------------------------19-____-• Signed------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECRETARY 41t co �y June 19, 1991 C E R T I F I E D M A I L Mr . Michael Marzi State of Connecticut Department of Transportation P .O . Drawer A Wethersfield, Ct 06109 Dear Mr . Marzi : RE : ZBA Application #1665-91 At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on June 6, 1991 , a variance was granted to Section 5 . 1 of the Zoning Regulations to allow reduction of lot area from 20, 300 s . f . to 20, 169 s . f on property located at 1535 Sullivan Avenue . (RR Zone) It is the boards understanding that the well on this property will not be affected . The Board noted that under Section 48-24 of the Connecticut General Statues, failure to grant this variance would result in total acquisition of this property. This action is effective upon your filing of the enclosed form in the Town Clerk's office at your own expense . Very truly yours . Robert Warren Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RW :dlb Enclosure of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals , hereby certify that on �1 VYI the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to S}aje 14 CDrinenJ GVT, Dego J rnP J !2 -Tain412c ) a variance to Section of the Zoning Regulations h� G 1 10\,J Ke ln � �d�- CA"6f on premises located at S�� l� � 4"� and more particularly bounded and described as follows : Northerly by land now or formerly of. William Joseph Descalco White, two hundred three (203) feet; Easterly by Sullivan Avenue, one hundred (100) feet; southerly by land now or formerly of t1ichael Ravolese, Jr. , two hundred three (203) feet; and westerly by other land now or formerly of said William Joseph DeScalco whiter one hundred (100) feet; OWNER OF RECORD: ,%I Va l v p-, Cc rkw- ET n L Fisted at South Windsor; Connecticut this o�V - day of 19_1. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC ACTT # 75-317 Received for Record this day of 19 at ATTEST : TOWN CLERK