The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVariance (514) APPLICATION FOR RECEIVED A PPlip n #� 91 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR , MAY 9 1991 Dat ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS So. WINDSOR PLANNING Receipt # IMMTANT: This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the second Friday of the Precedina month to insure being heard at the next meeting. ALL ITEMS EAST BE ANSWERED AND ALL SUPPLEMENTS MUST BE SUMNITTED. THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED IF INCOWLETE. - The application and supplements must be filed in duplicate. - The application must be typewritten or printed in ink. - A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application showing streets, lot lines, building lines, zone boundary lines, dimensions, and buildings present or proposed, and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from bject property. - If a - riance is being requested, a legal description of the property must be submitted with t-ie application. This description can be obtained from mortgage records. - The sign from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets. - The applicant, or a representative, must be present for the public hearing. The time, date and place of the hearing will be advised by mail. - Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department at the South Windsor Town Hall. APPLICANT: ��n C7"/C, T MAILING ADDRESS_ 14 OWNER OF RECORD OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION 0,'" ' �I/' U 7 CT 'Ai LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION _ GLI ' " J f X-'" " / ZONE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Request Variance to Section > 1 of the Zoning Regulations to allow C r i �-y _0, �1 `ti - j C f%. T� G li or state hearing under Section of the General Statutes for or temporary and conditional permit for or an appeal from the Zoning Officer's decision involving_ Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? 6�-70V&C"VM4W7AG C.zavbL-/Uiw1N6_ XVr/moo/ i7y (If Corporation, submit a list of officer's. Ii Co-partnership, submit a list- of owners) . Is the applicant owner, lessee, or prospective tenant? A/0 Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? /V D (If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property in question) . Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? b o State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary) . IfNU,61C , �r✓n!. 6cNE'?AC JYra7'v7-6 �/�- ��/ �i�/Lvi�F --ro 621a1u7- -T 71/.E IIAI2/,,yvGL- wOVi_b 2FSui_r AV //V yam/ 707/-lL 114Cco",/i 5%Ti0-V OF T/-e/- -7A'u f .Oz�y y /^iG 7/IF Ol viyEi2 S) SF /I/V 6cc V/1/7ivc y D/ 77-4E 01�f /VO Ajl LI LT p/_ 71- 4/h TJ�N, Dated this !day of ��/�}� Year j9/ Telephone # 2 5Y APPLICANT: � ,Gy �-�� /LJiC/l/� L G /VA/�Z i /�GFiy> foe C'ewN .Y�•O T (Signature) OWNER: /OL e4JE (Signature) ACTION 9 F THE BOARD G TID DENIED . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cA N r m — z SHED z w 1 ? RpTN A��EANp �1519 0. w ? �p 2 ; o P 1 36' •4� r r ,rn iT_ Z Z LIMIT OF PRO DRIVEWAY LIMIT OF o Cn 1.1109 SHED 1 W F• N 1 �s152? i� _ GLAK NG ARC A T TI, APPROX.GRADE LIMIT K TAKING LINE o SAVE TREE :RE Z c� 1 S , In 1 IF p,L. 535 pR CpRTESE ET SALVAT _ J I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP AND SUBSTANTIALLY CORRECT AND WERE PREPARED N A. WITH THE STANDARDS OF A CLASS D SURVEY AS DFc LODE OF PRACTICE FOR STANDARDS OF :.000RAC �. til '-- AND MAPS, ADOPTED DECEMBER !0, 1975 c+S %A'- ` CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION OF LAND SL RVE'V.an . •BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEL,EF. r� 'Y : DATE REVISION RED. BY TOWN NO 132 __- re 3�20 !90� 3-28�`t/ RAJ T&n �-�in . M. 132-102 ^ �2 /9 u)oRK AREA s q E, To 5C 0,cv- PROJECT NO. PINNEY, PAYNE, VAN LEN"TEN, BURRELL. WOLFE S OILLMAN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW A SCALE rINNCY 25 WEST STREET 0045Y 0.►AYN E• NCw NILrORO OrrICC TNQNAS w,v..LCNTCN P057 OFFICE BOX 550 AO MA'N 1TnEET MUCH A.rURRCLL DANBURY, CONNECTICUT 06810 Ncw '1LroNU.CONNECTICUT 06770 N I%B C N T J w O L r C JCS 11 N.DILL.— (203)743•27z1 wIL LIAN S.57CCL[.JR. RIOGCrICLO Or-CL JCrrR Y AUI MAIN SIACET C 6.SICK xICwIC2 TIED D.CACxCN" RIDGEFIELD.CONNCC T ICUT 05077 rD]I A]8.]721S JA-r.S N.NALCNCY N IC NACL S.NCnCNNA CCLAISCL T A LrRfD P.rO RING NO-AS L.CNCNCY Nancy R. S ienkiewicz January 2 4 , 1986 'ALSO AoNIrTfD IN VA PLEASE ACDLY TO New M-i l-- ord 'ALSO AO-ITT ED IN D.C.AND NY George R. Sullivan , Jr . , Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of New Milford 24 Church Street New Plilford , Ct . 06776 RD : 130tification Of Property Owners of Variable Application by DOT Dear Mr . Sullivan :. I have researched -the issue of whether property owners whose land is to be condemned by a state agency must consent to the agency' s application for a variance . The answer is clearly, no . Section 48-24 of the General Statutes gives the conde.nnina authority the power to obtain a variance for the portion Of property which will remain after the takina . In Smith v . Zoning Board of Appeals , 174 Conn . 323 ( 1978 ) , where the p_ainti _f Property owners were neither notified o_` nor consented to the application for a variance , the Connecticut Supreme Court stated : The remaining issue in this appeal is the plaintiff ' s claim that the granting of a variance without their consent violates their constitutional right to just compensation by forcing them to assume the financial risk of structural alteration or sale of property subject to a variance . We disagree . The Plaintiffs , claims for consequential damages to the remaining land resulting from the partial taking could be considered by a trier of fact under General Statutes Section 13a-76 . Damages ; wculd be calculated by subtracting the r LT Cl JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL (Officc of 'c ITr ,�ttarncu Chci;,r;;l GO BFlAINARD ROAD HARTFORD. CT 06114 Telephone : 566-2257 February 28 , 1986 Douglas M. Hummel Assistant Property Agent Office of Rights of Way Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield , CT 06109 Dear Mr . Hummel : With reference to our conversation concerning Conn . Gen . Stat . s 48-24 as of this date I have examined an opinion letter dated January 24 , 1986 by the law firm of Pinney, Payne , Van Lenten , Burrell , Wolfe & Dillman , P.C. addressed to the chairman of the New Milford Zoning Board of Appeals . Please be informed that I am completely in agreement with said opinion. Very truly yours , JOSEPH I . LIEBERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL v Paige Everin Assistant Attorney General PE : rw �i co 14jr June 19, 1991 C E R T I F I E D M A I L Mr . Michael Marzi State of Connecticut Department of Transportation P .O . Drawer A Wethersfield, Ct 06109 Dear Mr . Marzi : RE : ZBA Application #1663-91 At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on June 6 , 1991 , a variance was granted to Section 5 . 1 of the Zoning Regulations to allow reduction of lot area from 20, 300 s . f . to 20 , 082 s . f on property located at 1527 Sullivan Avenue . ( RR Zone ) It is the boards understanding that the well on this property will not be affected . The Board noted that under Section 48-24 of the Connecticut General Statues , failure to grant this variance would result in total acquisition of this property. This action is effective upon your filing of the enclosed form in the Town Clerk's office at your own expense . Very truly yours, Robert Warren Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RW :dlb Enclosure ChQ4a-� of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals , hereby certify that on �y� �p cjGl the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to (aoneC�'Cu Dei2 � T�ppa)"ta a variance to Section ' _ of the Zoning Regulations �b G feG��t �tA 4 ao w S on premises located at Sol i Jar.. and more particularly bounded and described as follows : NOiT.'i:RAY by land now or for-nsr'_y of Charles C. ':leintraub, et al, 203 feet; A3^':-j,:?Lf by Sullivan avenue, 100 feet; SC�;?-i-i?iY by lend now or forrvPrly of ':lilliar Joseph De.,cslco White, 203 feet; and by land now or for. Orly of William Joseph DeScalco White, 107 feet. OWNER OF RECORD: C H P rC,G),,bc4 y + ET A L Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this �) - day of ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL PUBLIC ACT # 75-317 Received for Record this day of 19 at ATTEST: TOWN CLERK