HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance - denied (5) APPLICATION FOR I�e� Application #433-/j
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR aJJ I9 Date_l//-9J
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Receipt C.?/d4—
11emAnTs This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the second
Friday of the preceding month to insure being heard at the next meeting.
ALL ITE MIDST BE ANSWASM AMID ALL SUPPLM LINTS MIDST BE SUEMTTBD. TBa APPLICATION WILL BE
RETURN IF INCOMPLETE.
- The application and supplements must be filed in duplicate.
- The application must be typewritten or printed in ink.
- A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the
application showing streets, lot lines, building lines, zone boundary lines, dimensions,
and buildings present or proposed, and buildings on adjacent properties and distance
from bject property.
- If a • riance is being requested, a legal description of the property must be submitted
with t.ie application. This description can be obtained from mortgage records.
- The sign from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 10 days
prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets.
- The applicant, or a representative, must be present for the public hearing. The time,
date and place of the hearing will be advised by mail.
- Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department at the South
Windsor Town Hall.
APPLICANTS Tom Couchon
MAILING ADDRESS 26D Amato. Drive, South Windsor, CT 06074
OWNER OF RECORD OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION David Pollack
LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION R10 Dart Hill Road
ZONE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION RR
CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWINGS
Request Variance to Section 5.3b of the Zoning Regulations to allow the construction
of a residential home in an area which does not meet the required 10,000 SF minimum
building area dui, to sln�ec in excess of 15$_
or state hearing under Section of the General Statutes for
or temporary and conditional permit for
or an appeal from the Zoning Officer's decision involving
Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? No
(If Corporation, submit a list of officers.. If Co=partnership. submit a list of owners) .
Is the applicant owner, lessee, or prospective tenant? No
Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? No
(If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property
in question) .
Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? No
State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application
and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if
necessary) .
The parcel has an extremely unique shape, and the areas available for residential develop-
ment are dictated by an existing 175' wide CL&P Transmission right of way that-dominates
the parcel. Development within these limited areas are further hampered by steep slopes
that are in excess of 15%.
Dated thisday of J►9hv Year-12j— Telephone
i
APPLICANT:
OWNER: (Sig to ) ,
Signature)
ACTION OF THE BOARD
GRANTED / D NIED
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G� � �. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. .� . .
• .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c.. . . . . . . . . . . .
Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? No
(If Corporation, submit a list of officers. If Co-partnership, submit a list of owners) .
Is the applicant owner, lessee, or prospective tenant? No
Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? No
(If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property
in question) .
Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? No
State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application
and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if
necessary) .
The parcel has an extremely unique shape, and the areas available for residential develop-
ment are dictated by an existing 175' wide CL&P Transmission right of way that dominates
the parcel. Development within these limited areas are further hampered by steep slopes
that are in excess of 15%.
Dated this_�L_day of J rimy i Year 6) Telephone f C
APPLICANT: _
(Sig to )
OWNER: ax
Signature)
ACTION OF THE BOARD
GRANTED DENIED
. . ; . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . /.�. � . .
� . : .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...- . . . .. ! . . . . . . . . . . .
lE
COPY
February 21, 1991
C E R T I F I E D M A I L
Mr . Tom Couchon
26D Amato Dr .
South Windsor, Ct 06074
RE: ZBA Application #1633-91 - R10 Dart Hill Rd .
Dear Mr . Couchon :
At the meeting of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals held on
February 7, 1991, your request for a variance to Section 5 . 3b of the
Zoning Regulations to allow construction of a residential home in an
area with less than the required 10, 000 s . f . minimum building area
due to slopes in excess of 15%, on property located at R10 Dart Hill
Rd . (RR Zone) was denied .
The Board felt by proposing to subdivide the lot, the applicant was
creating his own hardship .
Very truly yours,
Robert Warren
Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
RW :dlb