Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance - denied (4) APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF SOUTH W I N 0 S 0 R Tt�agiPLfI0SrIoAA ZONING BOARD 0/ A/PIALS Filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fee , IMPORTANT: This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the second Friday of the preceding month to insure being Receipt No heard at the next meeting. ALL ITEMS MUST BE ANSWERED AND ALL SUPPLEMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED. THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED IF INCOICLETE. application and supplements must be filed in duplicate. 'Der)I'P- The a PP ^� - The application must be typewritten or printed in ink. - A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application shoving streets, lot lines, building lins3, zone boundary lines, dimensions, and buildings present or proposed, and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from subject property. - If a variance is being requested, a legal description of the property must be submitted with the application. This description can be obtained from mortgage records. - The sign purchased from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 110 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets. - The applicant, or a representative, must be present for the public hearing. The time, data and place of the hearing will be advised by mail. - Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department or Building Departme at the South Windsor Town Hall. 19 APPLICANT T ! !/ j /'iM/•VT LFi+�v�/' ;/1 T/cam✓ �IAILINIG ADDRESS ,OC ' ���-�i��,v w T<< ��F/�cr_.� C. T OWNER OF RECORD OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION &�Iy 7N'C/' ZONE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION f' C CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: � k REQUEST VARIANCE TO SECTION OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS TO ALLOW 2.5 /5S + OR STATE HEARING UNDER SECTION OF THE GENERAL STATUTES FOR i OR TEMPORARY AND CONDITIONAL PERMIT FOR i� OR AN APPEAL FROM THE ZONING OFFICER'S DECISION INVOLVING vim.. n_oc Is applicant a corporation or co—partnership? (If Corporation, submit a 1 ist of officers. If co—partnership, submit a list of owners) . Is the applicant owner, lessee or prospective tenant? /V Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? (If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property in question.) Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? /V State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application, and indicate why /ocher options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary; '/_ ,TC, > 77// ✓ /S y T /w 7/—iF / i/I L TuF �� ,�J tL% /'i'c .`'%'✓ -y THv �f✓vY/n Ty/ Ov�:vE/'(S ( S/ A OX" >tiF_" /l�;a,:v•�F/Z 7!r%zG>� c=i-/ /VG %/��� CG/ n Dated this r!, �/CJ .� / . day of APPLICANT: /t-in� 7! — ref✓� F� Gc .v/ —,f?.�; (Signature) OWNER: Sf_F Z�/i/�;i S A 44, (Signature) ACTION OF THE BOARD at the meeting held on GRANTED �'�/�ED r t.o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ^f 1, PINNEY, PAYNE, VAN LENTEN, BURRELL,'WOLFE & DILLMAN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW A SEARLE.INNCY 25 WEST STREET NCW MILrORD OrrICE ooNeY 3.►AYMc• POST OFFICE BOX 650 +e MAIN STwECT TMJMAS W.V—LCNTEN NCW MILrOMD.CONNECTICUT Oe776 MUGM A, SURRCLL DANBURY, CONNECTICUT C6a10 365 1161 MOB[Mr U WOLrC -- J Orla M. On L-AN (203)7A3-2721 n1DG ErICLO orrICE WILLIAM S.STLCLE.JR. •UI MAIM ST RCET UCrrRCY S.SIENAIEWIC2 RIDGCrIELD.CONNECTICUT 06677 TCD D. n.cKER•• Ii0]I�]�.])26 COLNSEL JAMS$N.MALONEY M ICMACL S.M CKENNA TMOMAS L.CMCNCT ALrREO P.rORINO Nancy R. Sienkiewicz January 24 , 1986 .LEASE REPLY To New Milford ALSO ADMITTED IN vA —ALSO ADMITTED IN D.C.AND NY George R. Sullivan, Jr . , Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of New Milford 24 Church Street New Milford, Ct . 06776 RE : Notification of Property Owners Of - Variable application by DOT Dear Mr . Sullivan :. I have researched the issue of whether property owners whose land is to be condemned by a state agency must consent to the agency' s application for a variance . The answer is clearly, no . Section 48-24 of the General Statutes gives the condemning authority the power to obtain a variance for the portion of property which will remain after the taking . In Smith v . Zoning Board of Appeals , 174 Conn . 323 ( 1978 ) , where the plainti f property owners were neither notified of nor consented to the application for a variance , the Connecticut Supreme Court stated : The remaining issue in this appeal is the plaintiff ' s claim that the granting of a variance without their consent violates their constitutional right to just compensation by forcing them to assume the financial risk of structural alteration or sale of property subject to a variance . We disagree . The plaintiffs ' claims for consequential damages to the remaining land resultinc from the partial taking could be considered by a trier of fact under General Statutes Section 13a-76 . Damages would be calculated by subtracting the t F, 1NEY, PAYNE.VAN LENTEN, SURRELL,WOLFE 6 DILLMAN. P C. George R. Sullivan , Jr . —2— January 23 , 1986 market value of the remainder after the taking from the market value of the property just prior to the taking . Laurel , Inc . v . State , 169 Conn . 195 , 205 , 362 A. Meriden V . Highway Commissioner , 169 Conn . 655' ,—T6-U, A. 2d . 1094 . Mr . Douglas Hummel of the Department of Transportation plans to notify the record owners. of the property to be condemned for the Lower Grove Street connection of the variance applications by certified mail . This method of notification is obviously sufficient . The Board should consider the variance applications submitted by the Department of Transportation under these circumstances . i- . l yl Jeffrey B . Sienkiewicz New Milford Town Counsel By Nancy R. Sien iewicz N�/lc o Douglas Hummel �ztr I-Tf Lartnrrtiflit - FX % 0 d JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL F C VAA Lnffirr, of Q'hr �ttorlint �hrr,rr;;1 90 BRAINARD ROAD HARTFORD, CT 06114 Telephone : 566-2257 February 28 , 1986 Douglas M. Hummel Assistant Property Agent Office of Rights of Way Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield , CT 06109 Dear Mr . Hummel : With reference to our conversation concerning Conn . Gen . Stat . s 48-24 as of this date I have examined an opinion letter dated January 24, 1986 by the law firm of Pinney, Payne , Van Lenten , Burrell , Wolfe & Dillman , P.C. addressed to the chairman of the New Milford Zoning Board of Appeals . Please be informed that I am completely in agreement with said opinion. Very truly yours , JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL v Paige Everin Assistant Attorney General PE: rw �O �y February 21, 1991 C E R T I F I E D M A I L Connecticut Department of Transportation P .O . Box A Wethersfield, Ct 06109 Attn : Michael Marzi RE: ZBA Application #1629-91 - Ellington Rd. and Sullivan Ave. South Windsor Dear Mr . Marz i : At the meeting of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals held on February 7, 1991, your request for a variance to Section 5 . 1 of the Zoning Regulations to allow reduction of lot area from 25, 153 s . f . to 19,490 s . f . on property located at the northwest intersection of the present Ellington Rd . and Sullivan Ave . (RC Zone) was denied . The Board felt if this variance was granted they would be creating more of a hardship for the owner to be able to do anything with the property. Very truly yours, Robert Warren Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RW :dlb THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the State of Connecticut, acting herein by its i Commissioner of Transportation, J. William Burns, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13a-73(b), the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised, has taken by filing an Assessment and Notice of Condemnation on November 2, 1990 , with the Clerk of the Superior Court in the Judicial District of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford the following described property owned by Donald W. Fish, 453 Hartford Turnpike, Vernon, Connecticut 06066, and in which the following persons and/or7corporation had an interest of record therein: The Savings Bank of Rockville 25 Park Street (Mortgagee, Financing Statement) Vernon, Connecticut 06066 The Metropolitan District W.B. (Caveat) 555 Main Street Hartford, Connecticut 06101 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Said premises are situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, on the southwesterly side of Sullivan Avenue, Route 194 at Ellington Road, Route 30, and bounded: NORTHEASTERLY - by Sullivan Avenue, Route 194, 245 feet; SOUTHERLY - by Ellington Road, Route 30, a total distance of 43.7 feet, more or less; NORTHWESTERLY, - by Owner's remaining land, a total distance of WESTERLY AND 252 feet, more or less, by a line designated SOUTHWESTERLY "Taking Line, " as shown on the map hereinafter referred to; NORTHERLY - by land now or formerly of the Town of South Windsor, 5 feet, more or less. 1 of 2 f , Donald W. Fish 132-112-10 And said parcel contains 0.029 of an acre, more or less, together with all appurtenances, all of which more particularly appears on a map entitled: "Town of South Windsor, Map Showing Land Acquired From Donald W. Fish by The State of Connecticut, Conn. Rte. 194, Scale 1" = 401 , January 1990, Robert W. Gubala, Transportation Chief Engineer - Bureau of Highways." (132-112-10) Said premises are taken together with the following easements and right: 1. A full and perpetual easement to slope for the support of the highway within an area of 0.008 of an acre, more or less, and located between and opposite approximate 'Stations 123+45 and 123+75 left, 124+48 and 124+75 left, Base Line Present Sullivan Avenue, Route 194, as more particularly shown on said map. 2. An easement for a temporary work area for the purpose of access for construction equipment, to grade, seed, place bit. curbing and to otherwise restore any areas disturbed during the reconstruction of Route 194, Sullivan Avenue, within an area of 0.069 of an acre, more or less, and located between and opposite approximate Stations 122+69 and 125+05 left, said Base Line, as more particularly shown on said map. Said easement shall terminate automatically upon completion of the roadway reconstruction project unless sooner released by the State. The temporary easement to be taken under this paragraph will be restored by removal of all temporary installations and by restoring all areas disturbed during construction. 3. A right to install B.C. curbing between and opposite approximate Stations 123+60 and 124+75 left, said Base Line, as more particularly shown on said map. Said right shall terminate automatically upon completion of the work by the State. The land taken herein is a portion of the premises contained in a Quit-Claim Deed dated February 13, 1989, and recorded in Volume 552 at Page 295 of the South Windsor Land Records. Dated at Wethersfield, Connecticut, this , day of J. William Burns Commissioner of Transportation ; State of Connecticut RECEIVED FOR RECORD_.__.----19 RECORDED IN SCUTN Robert W. Gubala WiNDSOR Chief Engineer LAND RECORDS VOL.(39(-P PAOE—�i Bureau of Highways 9Y n G O N ERK Duly Authorized ASSISTANT TO:�N C 2 of 2 m STA.64.80.61 COMMUNITY RD. U STA.127-ZU.Vb Q R E.194 w iD 2� o N 0 G I �Z P.T.STA.126.3155 9G \\�� WAPPING COMMUNITY CHURCH i I I w to I I ;, I C.H.D. \ q I � I I �j1 DIRECTIONAL LINE I N I :j" SULLIVAN AVE. CURVE DATA I Z I o= 13'-04'-33.5" D = 7•-09'-43.1" T = 91.686' N / L = 182.575' I TOW 0 R = 800.000' l I OF sou 00 WINDS O� io `\ \\ MENT AREA I I ft 8" 60 \ I _ \ P. C.STA.124+48.98 M =836' \ I • 20P.DRIVEWAY 45'I I PROP.RETAINING WAIL DNL -- I f DISH I I Z I R=844' O I 130' 1 1 Z Ic 15' u� P. T.STA.123+22.64 ——— U) �'� I STY I �S_Z C BRICK I (L IN-i N 1776 9F I I • EASEMENT AREA ♦! g �v o 3P i t I R=20' R=10952' �_4 I I 0 L-33= APPROX.SLOPE LIMIT �y AKING LINE - 115 R=25' SNET J ET L=44'. 81779 SNET HIGHWAY LINE 158= v st 330 V, N 88'-29'-46.7 " 48 49 PRESENT ELLINGTON ROAD ( RTE. 30 -- P.T.STA.50.15.39 JE SULLIVAN AVE. CURVE DATA