Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance (502) APPLICATION FOR Application t I (C 5- Ci TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR Date ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Receipt /' DMORTANTS This application must be submitted to the Planning Department by the second Friday of the preceding month to insure being heard at the nest meeting. ALL ITEM SST BB ANSVW= ABD ALL SUPPLEMENTS MIDST BB SUBIIITTBD. ZHB PLICAtIOB VIM BB RETQRM IF IBCOWLM- f` The application and supplements must be filed in duplicate. - The application must be typewritten or printed in ink. - A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application shoving streets, lot lines, building lines, zone boundary lines, dimensions, and buildings present or proposed, and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from bject property. - If a • riance is being requested, a legal description of the property must be submitted with t.:e application. This description can be obtained from mortgage records. - The sign from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets. - The applicant, or a representative, must be present for the public hearing. The time, date and place of the hearing will be advised by mail. - Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department at the South Windsor Town Hall. Roger & Suanna Ouellette APPLICANT: 164 Graham Road, South Windsor, CT 06 MAILING ADDRESS OWNER OF RECORD OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION Roger & Suanna Ouellette LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION No 164 Graham Rd So Windsor , CT 06074 ZONE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION A 20 CHECK. ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 54ro`k- 3 . 10 .9 - c.X ppv,slo�. nur tAt� itequest Variance to Section 2 -S"&ihe Zoning Regulations to allow f or the ad ition of one garage bay and family , dining and bedroom space or state hearing under Section of the General Statutes for or temporary and conditional permit for or an appeal from the Zoning Officer's decision involving, Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? no (If Corporation, submit a list of officers. If Co-partnership, submit a list of owners) . Is the applicant owner, lessee, or prospective tenant? dinner Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area?no (If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property in question) . Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? no State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary). * See Attached Sheet Dated this__LaL_day of Year ig90 Telephone # 644-1158 APPLICANT: D-.ru �.�Gt�.l�1,Gt.� (Signature) OWNER: (Signature) ACTION OF THE BOARD GRANTED DENIED r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4�?-cQ. .<�1.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `e:�f'. . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . F/I [ po�'Y January 14, 1991 C E R T I F I E D M A I I. Mr . & Mrs . Roger Ouellette 164 Graham Rd . South Windsor, Ct 06074 RE : ZBA Application #1625-91 Dear Mr . & Mrs . Ouellette : At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on January 3, 1991, the following variances to the Zoning Regulations were granted : to Section 3 . 10 . 9 to allow 23% impervious coverage ( 15% allowed) ; (2) to Section 5 . 2 for a 4 foot side yard variance to allow addition 6 feet from property line and a 14 . 5 foot front yard setback variance to allow an addition 25 . 5 feet from front property line on property located at 164 Graham Rd . (A-20 Zone) . This action is effective upon your filing of the enclosed form in the Town Clerk's office at your own expense . Very truly yours, Robert Warren Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RW :dlb Enclosure I, Robert Warren, Chairman of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals, hereby certify that on 1/3/9 1 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to: a variance to Section 3. 10 . 9 and 5. 2 of the Zoning Regulations to allow expansion of a non-conforming structure for an addition ,. to allow 23% impervious coverage; 4 foot side yard variance; and 14. 5 foot front yard variance on premises located 164 Graham Road and more particularly bounded and described as follows: Northerly: by land now or formerly of William H, end Ghariea P. Andrulot, two hundred (2001) (*at; Easterly: by land now of formerly of Dora Ilubsrman and Murray Sognenberg, *no hundred (1001) feet; Southerly: by land now or formerly of Dorothy White, two hundred , (2001) (s&t; Westerly; by Graham Road, one hundred 41001) lest. OWNER OF RECORD: Roger Ouellette and Suanna Ouellette Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 14 t ay of Jan. 19 91 2g,L4A 4'10n� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC ACT #75-317 Received for Record this day of 19 at ATTEST: TOWN CLERK ADDENDUM TO: APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS S E C T I O N - 3. 10 . 9 3 . 10 . 9 A building containing a permitted use, but which does not conform to the requirements of these regulations regarding building height limit, floor area, width of lot, percentage of lot coverage and required yards and parking facilities, may not be enlarges or altered or rebuilt unless : a. Such enlargement provides for a permitted use containing no more family dwellings than now exist. b. Any additions are constructed within the applicable yard requirements. VARIANCE REQUESTED: 3. 10 . 9 b. Front Yard, Side Yard This house was constructed over thirty-three years ago, in 1957 . The limitations specified in these regulations were not in effect at that time . The fact that certain regulations were adopted after a house was built places that house in the unique circumstance of being non-conforming . The Owner/Applicants made no contribution toward placing their home in this situation, therefore, they should not be penalized in their attempt to improve their property. S E C T I O N - 5 . 2 VARIANCE REQUESTED: Front Yard - Per Regulations 40 . 0 ' - <Front Yard Requested 25 . 51 > - Variance Requested 14. 5' The house was originally constructed with a front yard set-back of 25 . 51 . This is consistent with the neighboring houses that were constructed during the same period, ( 1957 ) . By incorporating the garage addition on to the existing garage it is both necessary and practical to maintain the fronts of the existing and added garages on the same plane . If, this variance is not granted the front of the new garage will be located 14 . 5 ' to the rear of the front of the existing garage resulting in a architectural oddity. VARIANCE REQUESTED: Side Yard - Per Regulations 10 ' - <Side Yard Requested 61 > - Variance Requested 4 ' The house was originally constructed with a north-side side yard of 201 . The garage addition is to house a pickup truck that requires an- overhead door width of 9 ' . Such an addition should be a minimum of 12 ' wide with a potential of 14 ' wide, thus the request for the 4 ' variance . The rear yard of the house lot can be accessed by the south-side side yard which is 18 . 41 . If the variance is not granted the garage cannot be built wide enough to accommodate the required 9 ' wide door . over ADDENDUM TO: APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VARIANCE REQUESTED: Impervious Coverage - Per Regulations 15% - <Impervious Requested 23%> - Variance Requested 8% The current impervious coverage is 3, 460 s . f. or 17% of the 20,000 s . f. lot. Of the 3, 460 s. f. impervious coverage, 1, 560 s. f. ( 7. 8%) is the house and 800 s . f. ( 4%) is the above ground pool . The proposed house addition will increase the building size by 1, 396 s . f. for a total area of 2,956 s . f. which is less than the allowed 3, 000 s. f. ,however, the total proposed impervious area will be 4, 460 s . f. or 23% which is 8% in access of the maximum 15% allowed. If one discounts the temporary above ground swimming pool, that accounts for 18% of the impervious area, the resulting proposed impervious area is 3, 660 s. f. or 18%. If this variance is not granted the impervious coverage will still be 17% and the Owner/Applicant will be deprived of the benefit of substantial improvements to their property . Further, the neighborhood will not realize the improvement in property values that will result from the addition of a refurbished 2, 956 s . f. ranch style house with a two car garage. g. s r. GRAY Doolt j;� j" O./s¢ * r A001T'J 0AJ z tA 7 „ t 1 ..