Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance (397) APPLICATION FOR T 0 W N O F S 0 U T H W I N D S O R TO BE COMPLETED BY BOARD Filed . . .�/, . �.,r. . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS /ATE) Fee . .�. . . . . . . . . . IMPORTANT: This application must be submitted to the Planning Department b the second Friday of the preceding month to insure being Y Y P g g Receipt No. heard at the next meeting. ALL ITEMS MUST BE ANSWERED AND ALL SUPPLEMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED. THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED IF INCOMPLETE. - The application and supplements must be filed in duplicate. - The application must be typewritten or printed in ink. - A Class D or better survey of the property in question must be submitted with the application, showing streets, lot lines, building lines, zone boundary lines, dimensions, and buildings present or proposed, and buildings on adjacent properties and distance from subject property. - If a variance is being requested, a legal description of the property must be submitted with the application. This description can be obtained from mortgage records. - The sign purchased from the Planning Department must be displayed on the property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all abutting streets. - The applicant, or a representative, must be present for the public hearing. The time, date and place of the hearing will be advised by mail. - Inquiries on this application may be directed to the Planning Department or Building Department at the South Windsor Town Hall. APPLICANT Admiral NiovincT & Stor_acre, TNe. MAILING ADDRESS 420 Ellington Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 Tel. 0528-4421 OWNER OF RECORD OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION Same LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION Same ZONE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION I CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: I X1 REQUEST VARIANCE TO SECTION 5 . 2 OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS TO ALLOW greater im.nervious coverage than otherwise allowed under a newly adopted zoning _ amendment. i OR STATE HEARING UNDER SECTION OF THE GENERAL STATUTES FOR OR TEMPORARY AND CONDITIONAL PERMIT FOR OR AN APPEAL FROM THE ZONING OFFICER'S DECISION INVOLVING Rev. 9-85 (over) Is applicant a corporation or co-partnership? Corporation (If Corporation., submit a list of officers. If co-partnership, submit a list of owners) . Is the applicant owner, lessee or prospective tenant? Owner Are there any liquor outlets within the restricted area? N/A (If yes, submit a list of the liquor outlets, their locations and distances from the property in question.) Is this property within 500 feet of another town line? No State clearly the unusual hardship or exceptional difficulty that prompts this application, and indicate why other options are unacceptable. (Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary) . At present, our facility has some 98 , 000 sa. ft. in 6 buildings, and impervious coverage of approximately 78 .60 . Subsequent to construction of our last building, the PZC adopted a zoning amendment imposing a maximum impervious coverage (building & pavement) of 750 . We only learned of this recently from our engineering consultant. In order to meet client reauirements, we must ex- pand our facility through construction of a 30 ,000 sq. ft. addition, which would bring us to 128 ,000 sq. ft. of buildings and 89 . 6% impervious coverage. Our hardships are: 1) we have no other location to place the addition; 2) we have n p nnin for this addition for some time; 3 we need this addition to re- tain our est�isned clients; is zoning amendment was a surprise to us a as such we had no opportunity to comment. The addition is nearly 600 ft. from Route 30 and in the middle of a large industrial zone. Thank you. Dated this day of -_ 19 APPLICANT: (Signature) OWNER: (Signature) ACTION OF THE BOARD at the meeting held on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GR T DENIED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i ■ ,gesigoofessionals, inc. ■ civil engineers • planners • surveyors LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ■ TO: Marcia Banach DATE: 8/10/88 Planning Department 1540 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT 06074 REGARDING: ZBA Application PROJ. NO. 88-287 at 420 Ellington Road WE ARE SENDING YOU: for your use at your request X for approval for your files for review and comment THE FOLLOWING: Three (3) copies of the ZBA application, three (3) copies of the legal description, three (3) blueprint copies of the Class D survey. Design Professionals, Inc. By: Richard P. Martel, P.E. & L.S. 291-8755 1170 Ellington Road (Route 30), South Windsor, CT 06074 0 (203) ad 'q TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Received from _-----_._`�c?tni-mi ral----------rav:uag - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 420 ^i l ing .can Road, S. Windsor, t'I'. ----of ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _-- 5 ''_____ Dollars fee for a hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. This hearing is to cover application number .___ 1L ' or-_ -_--ar__ t� S t� - '= ---- - ----------- f ---- `- - �t -4-a4te-1i{-itelag--t7e�ir�tj}-----R--d-- . , DdatSuh' soat oWdr,I Conn.,this---l2.................day of------�UTASt ------------------- 19_ 8_. Signed----------%!,J-QF_RQsciQ--------------------------------------- SECRETARY ;} NO. e9 7 c* REC 19 ED FROM Q� ov . �. CT3 DOLLARS Account Total $ Amount Paid $ Balance Due $ "THE EFFICIENCYo LINE"AN AMPAD PRODUCT-23-121 0,0N Sf,`� G U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 SOR•Co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 August 16 , 1988 Admiral Moving & Storage, Inc . 420 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Reference: Application #1839-88 Dear Mr. Milkie: This is to notify you that the above named application to the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals will be heard on Thursday, September 1 , 1988 at 7: 30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor. Someone must be present at the hearing to represent the application. Included in the $35 . 00 application fee is the cost of a sign to advertise that a public hearing will be held regarding this property. This sign can be obtained at the Planning Department at the South Windsor Town Hall and must be displayed on the property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing in a location visible from all public streets. Enclosed is Receipt #1839-88 for your records. Ver truly yours, .41 064.1 �� - (�Lla 401 Richard H. Eriksson Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RHE:mr Enclosure: �4011M 3f,(� o � T�� O-P somiA ?&7� c s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR co��,� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 CERTIFIED MAIL September 6, 1988 Admiral Moving & Storage, Inc. 420 Ellington Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Reference: Application #1839-88 Dear Mr. Milkie: At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on September 1, 1988, a variance to Section 5.2 of the Zoning Regulations to allow impervious coverage of 89.5% for construction of a storage area on property located at 420 Ellington Road, S. Windsor, was approved subject to site plan approval by Planning and Zoning. This action is effective September 16, 1988, and upon your filing of the en- closed form in the Town Clerk's office at your own expense. Very truly yours, Thomas Murrin Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals TM:mr Enclosure: I, Thomas Murrin, Secretary of the South Windsor Zoning Board of Appeals , hereby certify that on the Zoning Board of Appeals granted to Admiral Moving & Storage, Inc. a variance to Section 5.2 of the Zoning Regulations to allow impervious coverage of 89.6% for construction of a storage area. This subject to site plan approval by Planning & Zoning. on premises located at 420 Ellington Road, S win(3Gnr CP 7nne T and more particularly bounded and described as follows : I I I10?',TIIERLYl_<ii.ld now o, formerl o -F. I)()rothy � {ivn hlmdred ei ?ht-y-a-i.�=� ;�r,ci c:i,;hLy-:ioc.il• �,il�, �,'OUJ I E AS'_CF"XJ,i• by F1.]Arg on IM;id, ei_rlAy-ni.ne ;.)rid s(--veai1-c•c'1) one hl,nld.r,,dLhs ('19. 17 ) f(—L. ; SOUTIIERLY by 1<Zrld no�,7 ol- formerly o i= Pei five hundred thirty-five Iiild ei-,,hl:y-five (li1C hundredths (535 . 85) feet ; and UESTI RLY by 1;itld now or formerly of StePh )r) i.e 1;as , severity-three ond e.[,o'ht.v--four. on.e hilri- dredths (73 . 84) feet. . I OWNER OF RECORD: Admiral Moving & Storage Inc Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 6 day of q=-Pmhar 19gg_. Thomas Murrin S retagy ZONIRC BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC ACT # 75-317 Received for Record this day of 19 _ at ATTEST : TOWN CLERK ;LINING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES (cont . ) Page ( 7) PUBLIC HEARING/WORKSESSION , September 1 , 1988 s Poorly4r• Murrin noted that Section 5 . 2 of the zoning regulations states k would that a 501 building line is required . He also said that a variance e him could be given to cover the porch , making the house conforming . and tht stair- dith no further questions from the Board, the open portion of the oing fearing was closed . APPLICATION #1839- 88 ADM.IRAL MOVING & STORAGE , INC . 420 Ellington , Rd . is 3r .- Robert Milkie and Mr . Peter DeMallie of Design Professions , Inc . rere present . Mr . DeMallie told the Board that the applicant was :essary requesting a variance to Section 5 . 2 to allow impervious coverage of 39 . 6% for construction of storage area on property located at 420 Ellington Rd. , S . Windsor . He said this would make it possible for from an addition to a building in the northwest corner of the property. •d, 4 map was submitted to the Board for their review . He said the from proposed addition would be approximately 30 , 000 square feet in size, and that impervious coverage is 78 . 6% . Mr . DeMallie said that sub- sequent to construction of the last building, the Planning & Zoning built ommission adopted a zoning admendment imposing a maximum impervious the leve}coverage (' building and pavement) of 75% . He said in order to meet his client ' s requirements , a 30 , 000 square foot addition would be necessary, fringing them to 128 , 000 square feet of buildings and 89 . 6% impervious ' out coverage . roximatel retainitNr . DeMallie stated that his client had no other location to place the addition . Also , that Mr . Milkie had been planning on this addition over the last three years , with the bankers holding the monies for aining that period . He explained that the addition would be 600 feet from and Ellington Road, and that visibility would be blocked from Route 30 . Ne noted that the Chamber of Commerce had recognized this facility quite attractive and awarded his client a Beautification Award . way and fore. to one spoke in favor of or in opposition to this appeal . ed, thlr'4r. Murrin asked Mr . DeMallie if any attempt had been made to purchase th litt'•'adjacent property to satisfy the reouirement of the Regulation . Nr. Milkie responded that he had not contacted the owner of the property the heafon the west end of his property, but all the other land owners in the area have refused to sell their land to him . r 4r. Warren noted that there was such intense construction at the site and proposed Mr . Milkie start looking for some alternate site . He of the ;,°xplained that the density of this area was such that he felt the on-con' applicant should start investigating another area should his business He require additional storage space . his pse ck cti is apse ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES (cont . ) ONI: PUBLIC HEARING/WORKSESSION, September 1 , 1988 Page (8) UBL r. Mr . Murrin asked Mr. Milkie if he had further plans for expansion in Ihatr this area . Mr . Milkie responded, no . He added any future expansion Jr. would depend upon his ability to purchase adjoining property. ;hrut Mr . Murrin asked if site plans had been approved by Planning $ Zoning . !rs . Mr . DeMallie said site plans were approved for the prior buildings , Jr. approximately 3 een PP Y years ago . Mr . Murrin was told b Mr . ith Y DeMallie that should the variance be granted Bari a new site plan would be submitted to Planning $ Zoning for their approval . PPLI With no further questions from the Board, the public portion of the ttor hearing was closed . as a APPLICATION #1841-88 CAPUANO BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS , 1208 Cromwell Ave . ttor Rocky Hill , CT goad Mr . Paul Capuano was present and requested a variance to Section 4 . 8 . 4 . relz of the zoning regulations to allow construction of three business signs and and allow the signs to be larger than regulations permit on property iould located at Nutmeg Road, S . Windsor , also known as Governors Square Business Center . Mr. Capuano submitted a concept plan of the proposed )pp os signs to the Board for their review. ihich Mr . Capuano discussed the area at length with the Board, showing what !r. P. was proposed for this area . He stated that the area in question was :hat } Nutmeg Road, and that the signs were not at a road but 25 ' off the dth r curb . He also said that he did not have a formal entrance anywhere, lific� just a lot of frontage area . Mr . Capuano said that the signs would be dme located at the three entrance locations ; the southerly side of Governor Highway at the intersect , northerly side of South Satellite Road at the!r. Mi Connecticut Avenue intersection and Nutmeg Road , South . ,f de, :hat P No one in the audience spoke in favor of or in opposition to this appeaindust Mr . Warren asked for clarification that three signs were being requeste parcel Mr . Capuano said that there would be three signs that identify the 1r. ML entire area as Governors Square Business Center . ,f I :hat t Mr. Murrin asked if individual establishments would be wanting their ow)rigir signs . Mr. Capuano said that there would be unit identification signs •�Uesti approximately 121, x 301and would be free standing in front of each unit • parallel to the building . fir. Mu Mrs . Neary asked if they would be low to the ground . Mr. Capuano sa=' iheire yes . (2) gEGULAR MEETING - WORKSESSION (cont . ) Page (3) ieptember 1 , 1988 �pPLICATION #1837-88 HERBERT 0 . LINDAHL, JR . r Motion was made by R . Warren to grant a variance to Section 5 . 2 of the toning Regulations to allow 27 ' to required setback to replace existing conded entry way and a 2 ' variance to the 20 ' sideyard, rendering the existing yuilding conforming on property located at 344 Miller Rd . , S . Windsor . Motion was seconded by B . Murray. con- .able qr. Warren noted the dangerous condition of the steps and retaining Balls . He also noted that nothing would be taken from the area and that the appearance of the proposed entry way would be improved . all voted in favor . Unanimously carried . 16 , 198F Effective Date : Sept . 16 , 1988 APPLICATION #1838-88 JOHN MEYER 4 . 4 of ty Notion was made by B . Murray to grant a variance to Section 3 . 10 . 3A of by the Zoning Regulations to allow construction of an addition to a non- conforming building on property located at 320 Long Hill Rd. , S . Windsor. Notion was seconded by M. Anthony. he rear said qrs . Murray noted the building was constructed in 1910 and that the would 50 ' building line from the street runs right through the front porch . :)St. All voted in favor . Unanimously carried. Effective Date : Sept . 16 , 1988 16, 1988 APPLICATION #1839-88 ADMIRAL MOVING & STORAGE , INC . Motion was made by M. Anthony to grant a variance to Section 5 . 2 of the )nditionZoning Regulations to allow impervious coverage of 89 . 6% for construction [ at of a storage area on property located at 420 Ellington Rd . , S . Windsor . was Motion was seconded by L . Neary. Mrs . Anthony noted that Mr. Milkie, owner, had plans for this addition from ththree years prior to the Planning $ Zoning Commission adopted a zoning he saleadmendment imposing a maximum impervious coverage of 75% . She also stated that the area was attractively kept and the building would not be visible from Route 30 . All voted in favor. Unanimously carried . 16, 198 Effective Date : Sept . 16 , 1988