Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SITE PLAN (159)
IV LL•La)VA9 UuNNtCTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ti APPLICATION FORM P ion No. : �67 _eived:ublic Hearing by. � u No. : 3 APPLICANT: GERBER SCIENTIFIC INC . ADDRESS : 83 GERBER RD. WEST SOUTH WINDSOR , CT 06074 644-1551 TELEPHONE: OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : GERBER SCIENTIFIC INC . ADDRESS : SAME AS ABOVE COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 425 SULLIVAN AVE . -SOUTH SIDE OF SULLIVAN AVE . ( RT. 194) AT THE INTERSECTION OF KENNEDY RD . ZONE: I NAME, ADDRESS , & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES S SHOULD BE JOHN L . DECKER-FACILITIES MANAGER AT ABOVE LISTED ADDRESS . 644-1551 TELEPHONE: _ THIS APPLICATION IS FOR : (Check one of the following) I . Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) . 2. Subdivision. 3. Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing required 4. Resubdivision (Public Hearing required) . 5. Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) . 6. Site Plan of Development. 7. Earth Filling [Section 101 and/or Earth Removal Sect (Public Hearing Required) . ion 9] 8. General Plan of Development . 9. Regulation Amendment : Zoning Subdivision 10. Other ' (explain in detail) : CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBM TRIPLICATE WITH ALL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS/AMqUL D ITTED IN TT HED CR T. Applicant - d Owner _ t PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION , CONT' D. TIME FRAMES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS/PLANS 1 . All prospective applicants are urged to confer with Town Planning Department and Engineering Department staff prior to submission of any application to the Commission . 2. Plans are officially received only on the fourth Tuesday of each month at the Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) . 3 . Three ( 3) sets of blueprints are required on the second Tuesday of the month for review by the Town Planning and Engineering Departments . This deadline must be met if you want to ensure that your application is officially received by PZC. These plans must be submitted as complete plans -- which includes application plus all required information contained on checklist. No plans will be accepted at the counter if checklist is incomplete. It is the applicant ' s responsibility to ensure that all information required on the checklist is submitted in one package I at the time of submission -- including landscaping plans, architectural elevations , traffic report , etc . Planning Department staff will not accept checklists with blank spaces , or wit.h "by others" in any space. 4. Town staff will notify the applicant with any changes required to make the plans in complete compliance with our Zoning/Subdivision Regulations . S. All changes requested must be made and new, complete blueprints must be submitted . At this time six sets of plans must be submitted . If a Public Hearing is required ( or optional but likely) then seven sets are required . 6. Planning Department/Engineering Department staff will review plans only once -- if the resubmissions are not complete/correct, the Town Planner ' s report will reflect that revisions were not made as requested . Gerber Sde hx. P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Tel. (203) 644-1551 March 9, 1990 Marcia Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor South Windsor, CT 06074 RE : Gerber Scientific Inc . 425 Sullivan Ave. South Windsor, CT Proposed Property Site Development Dear Ms. Banach: Attached please find the following listed items which constitute the Gerber Scientific Inc. application for a site plan of development for its Phase II as originally noted on application 88-12OP—Gerber Scientific—Master Plan. A concerted effort has been made to address the engineering and site details as outlined in the Planning & Zoning Commission letter of March 6, 1989, the SEA review to the Director of Public Works dated Jan. 20, 1989 along with the Director of Planning comments of letter dated Jan. 24, 1989. We also wish to thank the town engineering staff for its assistance and help in finalizing the drawings and information to date. 1 . Application for the Planning and Zoning Commission with application fee for the sum of $50.00. (3 copies) 2 . Application for the Inland Wetland Water Courses and Conservation Application with application fee for the sum of $100.00 (3 copies) 3 . Application for Statewide Inland Wetland & Water Course activity report with the required USGS Quad map referenced location. (3 copies) 4 . Letters of approval of service from Northeast Utilities—gas & electric—dated Feb. 6, 1989 and Feb. 22, 1989. 5 . Letter of approval of the Connecticut Water Company to provide domestic and fire protection—dated Jan. 30, 1989. 6. Town of South Windsor check list of required information of site plans , as signed by Fuss & O'Neill Consulting Engineers—dated Mar. 9, 1990--Guy Mitchell. 7. Gerber letter of notification to all abutter property owners dated March 7, 1990—Mailed Certified Mail. 8. Six (6) sets of drawings A-1 and A-2 indicating a schematic floor plan and exterior building elevations as prepared by Orlando Annulli and Sons Inc. , sealed by John U. Eberly, registered architect. 9. Six (6) sets of drawings as proposed by our consulting engineers = Fuss & O'Neill and bearing required licensed seals where applicable to include: Master Plan M1-M2 Key Map K1 Plot Plan P1-P2 Roadway Plan R1 Topographic Plan T1-T2 Utility Profile U1-U2 Landscape & Lighting Plan L1 Conservation Plan and Details Cl-C3 Details DI-D3 10 . One copy of storm water flow calculations as prepared by Fuss & O 'Neill engineers. 11 . One copy of the State of Connecticut Department of Transportation Certificate #993 traffic approval letter dated Nov. 21 , 1989. Also one copy of State of Connecticut D.O.T. letter dated Jan. 22 , 1990 indicating S.T.C. approval to operate the facility without full compliance as noted therin. 12. Copy of letter from Reid and Riege P.C. counsel for Gerber dated Jan. 12, 1990 noting compliance of recording with the Town of South Windsor certain information required by the S.T.C. and acknowledged receipt thereof by the Traffic Commission of such notice. Further such other legal requirements of land easements as noted in the S.T.C. certificate #993 are being diligently pursued by Gerber Counsel to meet the terms noted therein. 13. Please note the Army Corp of Engineers letter of approval for wetlands encroachment and usage as dated Aug. 1 , 1989 has been superimposed on drawing P1-Plot Plan dated 12/21/89. We trust the foregoing information complies with the Town of South Windsor regulation which will permit scheduling Gerbers applications for site development at the earliest possible time with the Planning & Zoning and Inland Wetlands Commission. Si erely , n L. Decker ACILITIES MANAGER cc: G. Mitchell-Fuss & O'Neill H.J. Gerber G. Gentile R . Maerz R. Treacy RECE,1)1 - , 19M - 2'O�TN OF SOUTH WSOR GA 9 (HECZLIST s T r 1 ihl t , SIT$ APPLICANT GZRf3E R SC I eWTI F IC I C 1 PROJECT NAME CAE R C3F-R Sal STC-0 KS TCMH 6)0 FACILl1Y `' , , Planning & Zoning Commission This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E./L.S. ) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications; items* 8-11 required where appropriate. i Check mark for each item supplies. 1. On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the ` following information: a. Name, address and telephone of applicant. ✓ b. Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. c. Name of Development. d. Date when drawings were made. 2. Key Map: An overall idap drawn to a scale of 1 inch quals 200 feet, which can be used as an overlay on Metropolitan District Maps. This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet. a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract, number of apartment units, parking requirements, etc. b. Layout of buildings ✓ c. Layout of streets and parking. a d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows. y e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows . f . Names of surrounding property owners . I N g. Proposed open spaces and recreation areas. N� h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties. i 1°:."."^`',. ' ° • • ,^_ e+r - 7 , ' , t�t,L".�,'�tS'�:'aft ,o r. },Ksra , . _., . , - -_ . x ._ a T C .. `, :'Wiry '- T - - •. .. ` ,;cif t 3. Architectural Elevations: ` Plans of the proposed buildings drawn to a scale of 1 8" = V - 0". g � � showin the ,elevAtions t of all sides of the proposed buildings'1z ,.in'- sufficient --- detail to show architectural- styling :=- -:� - z= --- _ Architect's seal on elevations for buildings g in excess of 5000 square feet (per CGS Chapter 390) . 4. Plot Plan: A layout map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets: (1) 24" X 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin; (2) 18" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin, containing the following data: a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. b. Proposed streets and street 'P et lines with center line stations, curve data, and parking spaces. c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including signs, outside lighting, and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened) e. Easements, noting.grantors, grantees, and rP u ose. P f. Names of abutting property owners. �Q g. Monuments will be -indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points, or other coordinated points, the monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall app ar in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. N� h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. i. A-2 certification; P.E./L.S. Seal. V 5. A Topographic Ma :A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following: a. All existing and proposed buildings. .� b. Curb lines andCPavement width) sidewalks. SHO WV o u PLO't P( AW 77 j—1 - I' s° ✓ C. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers. , ... P rY $0000" d. Existing and proposed water -and-::gas main=Lsystems._ _- e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines. Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. v f. Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in_ g p p not less than two-foot intervals, but in cases of relatively level land, the contours shall be one-foot intervals and spot elevations. _ g. Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note ` that none are present. h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins, endwalls, manholes, lengths and sizes of pipes. (Maximum distance between catch basins shall fro` be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain - lines ;. shall be 15 inches. ) IJA i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm =: drainage system as needed. J . Location and indications of existing brook channels, and 100-year flood limits. k. A-2 Certification; P.E./L.S, Seal. 6 . Landscaping plan. —too` Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines. 8. Traffic report. 9 . Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 4 • feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches, including ruled margins and containing the following: N� a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile. Por- b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage. c. Sight line at driveway & street intersections. uQ Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades. Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all my rt and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material. Where a -i ._ - -- _ ny storm drainag line discharges- nto_an` existin • brook sufficient g profile of this brook will be -shown to determine conditions. g. Metropolitan District Commission datum shall b used on all sites accessible to these controls. The Town Engineer shall, based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls . h. Profiles shall show all sancta sewer lines and d manholes, including elevations, sizes, lengths, and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. VA_ 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which require or include a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required. This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet. Na 1 . Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer. The report shall demonstrate the feasibility o- the proposed individual systems; '.the report should deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following points a. General nature and development of surrounding area. b. Topography and natural drainage pattern. Ok c. Subsurface conditions- as shown by subsurface investigation, including soil absorption characteristics, ground water level conditions, ledge rock, and general nature of soil. d. General description of type of development contemplated. e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities, indicating sizes for various ground conditions, materials to be used, and the general layout pattern to be used, etc. f. Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems. g. Map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout. h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or rivers. Nw' �•1 C, �. Test results and engineering evaluation per'Section 4.13.-9. All information required above is included in this application at the . time of submission. PLKN PRE ER (P.E. L.S. ) DATE • `T November, 1987 s r 1 1 , RECEIVED FEB 02 1%9 THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY mmm"' NORTHERN DIVISION: 25 NORTH ROAD • CWS EAST WINDSOR,CONNECTICUT O6JX"13LA#&Wff4 A SUBSIDIARY OF CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, MC. AW January 30, 1989 Mr. John Decker Gerber Scientific, Inc. P. O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Dear Mr. Decker: The Connecticut Water Company can provide water for domestic use and fire protection to the proposed expansion of Gerber Scientific on Sullivan Avenue in South Windsor. As discussed, the water main installation will be a two phase project. Phase I will serve the existing building with additional fire protection and Building IV with domestic water and fire protection. Phase II will serve Buildings II and III as future expansion occurs. The system will be a 12" main located in an easement to The Connecticut Water Company looped from Sullivan Avenue. Placement of fire hydrants along the main will be determined by the South Windsor Fire Marshal. Sincerely, a4�fIvltll Christopher J. Wojciak Technical Services CJW/s d cc: R. P. Kulas D. F. Lesnieski S. R. Melanson KtL:EiVED tr. FEB 07 1989 CONOCTTa,U,,,meP �„ FACILITIES MANAGER MICMCCOWNly P.O.BOX 4W "01VCW van*�cow mn ENFIELD.CONNECTICUTOSM2-04Sp "°""MT uujm comp"n (203)623-2421 wmH""NXXEM mar COWAW GEORGE W.RUSSELL DISTRICT MANAGER �. February 6, 1989 Mr. John Decker Gerber Scientific Instruments 83 Gerber Road South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Decker: This letter is to acknowledge our meeting on Feb concerning your proposed new building on SullivanAve 3' 1989 Windsor, CT, Avenue, South Connecticut Light and Power Company has a ample electricity to serve your new building on Sullivanpply of Windsor, CT, Avenue, South If you have any further questions P1 me at (203)627-1227, ease feel free to contact Sincerely, eo or Pastva r dsj Energy onsultant 1 .29 „. RECEIVED. FEB 24 1989 " wunRN�a+�acrr�a�enac oowwn M01V`M"lm" ""t'° C0~ FACiUTiES MANAGER 10"W"T UTIUM KIIM OOMMW NORTM�AiT NUCIM LM[I101'CfIMMMI February 22, 1989 Mr. John L. Decker Gerber Scientific, Inc. P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 , Dear Mr. Decker: Enclosed for you information is the proposed piping design for the Sullivan Avenue site. Please review and contact me at 627-1284 if you have any questions. SincerelW' Carmin Lattell Gas Marketing Consultant /cad Enclosures E SERS STATE OF CONNECTICUT ra "— " Tra Comwioner off Tnn3gortatioo TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Public safety COrrtR113310flK Of Motor Vch+cfe3 Department of Transportaxion 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A t" -Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 ISSUED November 21 , 1989 CERTIFICATE NO. 993 ISSUED TO Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 - FOR Gerber Scientific F=:i 1 ity Sullivan Avenue - to 194 Town of South Win, _- pursuant to Sectic_n 14-311 cf the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised and the Regulations of the St...: Traffic- Commission The applicant is hereby or--' : -d tc comp With the conditions and requirements as set zze attached reper: and plan Failure to comply w4 ___ :��1 cone r ;ohs and the reYu=cements Will constitute sufficient bay= r _ revccation ^' "he C-r-ificste , NO PERSON SHALL OPER THE Dz ELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION THERE'1-11' UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE Cnjk-T HAS COMPLIED WITH 7-E-Er ABOVE UNLESS PERMISSION HAS _ . --QUESTED AND RECEIVED F�.�: THE SATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO Lam::: z PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL EXP:?E CNE (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE ISSUED UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND -QUIREMENTS A?.E COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION aS REQUESTED AND OBTAINED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TC EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE: Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be reviewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public safety. J.WILLIAM BURNS CHAIRMAN William W. Stoeckert Executive Director STATE OF CONNECTICUT llfii�tdiF.R& TRAMC COMMISSION commissioner of Transportation c Safety Department of Transportation c0°" O"Q`off M or VeMcks 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Wethersfidd, Connecticut 06109 Phone: 566-5228 RECEIVED DEC 5 W9 November 27, 1989 FACILITIES MANAGER Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Sir: Subject: Gerber Scientific Facility Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor Certificate No. 993 and Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-8812-01 detailing conditions of the Certificate are enclosed. Highways - obtained from the Bureau of Hi An encroachment permit must be b 9 District No. 1 office at 1107 Cromwell Avenue - Town of Rocky Hill prior to performing any work within the state highway right-of-way. In addition, the enclosed procedure for the transfer of property and/or rights to the State of Connecticut should be followed to satisfy Condition No. 14, also enclosed is the procedure for filing certificates on Land Records to satisfy Condition No. 19. Very truly your, liam W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Planning and Zoning Commission Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. An fgiwl OPPortunitY EMP/oyrr l _ MEMBERS O F C O N N E C T I C U T Cotrtmwiawr of Trampo tata. STATE Cbmog"10mr of Public Way TRAFFIC COMMISSION COMMON fm of Moor vehm-W Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Dom" cr 'Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 r ISSUED November 21 , 198 CERTIFICATE NO. 993 ISSUED TO Gerber Scientif ic, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West - South Windsor CT 06074 s' f Gerber Scientific Facility FOR Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised and the Regulations of the State Traffic Commission ordered to comply With the conditions and The applicant is hereby requirements as set forth is the attached report and pleas. he uirements Will Failure to comply With all conditiyocatioatof the Certificate. constitute sufficient basis for re _ THEREOF BALL OPERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION �RE NO PERSONS STATE UN TIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED FROM THE UNLESS PERMISSION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO OPE RATE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS- ONE DATE ISSUED YEAR FROM THE THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL EXPIRE IREMENTS ARE COMPLIED WITH WITHIN UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND REQU THAT PERIOD OR PER M IS REQUESTED AND OBTAINED TE:M THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION D this Certificate ublic be Upon due notice from this Commis inathe interest o P reviewed and modified or revoked safety. J.WILLIA�BURNS CHAI Will am W. Stoeckert Exe cutive Director .Y STATE CF CON �C.;�,T S.T.C.No. Report By Patrick J. Bush OEr'AR7ME�IT OF 7F .+`JSrQa7�i AN ; Date 11/89 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc.No. REPORT TO THE Date to S.T.C. Nay Z 19�9 t° Checked By Barbara B. Ri coz i STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Date 11/89 South Windsor Received By S.T.C. TowN NOV 2 0 M LOCATION Gerber Scientific Date Route 194 Approved By S.T.G. a. ........WX REQUESTED BY D" Gerber Sq ntifl� /' S.M.No. A 1 i cati on ' REQUEST Pp C �L� HOW R See Pre-Aous S.T.C. Report for Certificate DATE 1_1 M88 X tive Secretary No. Recommendations In accord ance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut Generscientifics, as rev i sed issue a certificate to Gerber Scientific foati ne Gerber hat S operation, facility, on Route 194 in the Town of South Wdicr, stating thereof, will not imperil the safety of the pub _ This recommendation is referenced to the developer's plans entitled: Scientific, "Roadway Plan, Sullivan Avenue & Site Drive, Gerber Inc. dated Nov ember, 1988 and revised March 79 1989 by Fuss & O'Neill , Inc. Avenue & Pierce Road, Gerber Scientific" dated October 9, "Sullivan 989 b Fuss & O'Neill , Inc. and revised November 69 198 by the 1 y Department of Transportation. This recommendation is based upon the following conditions: 1. That the sit e access drive be constructed as shown on the above referenced plans. 2. That the developer install and maintain a "Stop" signs nsoand bar, double yellow center line �1V �aas showncontrol on the above pavement markings on the site d e referenced plan. 3. That th e developer provide and maintain a clear sight line of 770 feet or more in each directions be from the site drive measured from a point 20 Route 194. The sight line feet back from the projected edge of Route 194. 8 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BUREAU OF HIGH��AYS 11 u iVlil�l .Illii ni ��V llWlll��, Town of South Windsor Gerber Scientific Route 194 STC No. 132-8812-01 Page 2 4. That the developer widen Route 194 to provide a sheltered left-turn lane, for northbound Route 194, at the site drive, as shown on the above referenced plan. 5. That the developer initially install all signs and pavement ; markings required by the construction of the sheltered left-turn lane on northbound Route 194, as shown on the above referenced plan. Upon the completion of installation, to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation, the State will maintain the signs and pavement markings on Route 194. 6. That the developer relocate the "Stop" sign and stop bar on Kennedy Road, as shown on the above referenced plan. f� s+ 7. That the developer widen southbound Route 194 and Pierce Road to provide two lane approaches, as shown on the above referenced plan. 8. That the developer initially install the signs and pavement markings required by the widening at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection, as shown on the above referenced plan. Upon A: the completion of installation to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation, the State will maintain the signs and pavement markings on Route 194. 9. That the developer revise the existing traffic control signal at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection to accommodate the new geometry. Plans for the signal revision will be reviewed and approved in a separate report. 10. That if a traffic control signal becomes necessary, for the Route 194 Site Drive/Kennedy Road intersection, due to the development's ; traffic the developer will be 'responsible for the installation. 11. That the developer construct the "emergency access" drive where shown on the above referenced plan and that the drive be designed and constructed to preclude casual use. - 12. That the developer equitably participate in any future project to construct an exclusive right turn lane on northbound U.S. Route 5 at it's intersection with Route 194. txl 13. That the developer equitably participate in funding for future ; improvements at the intersection of Routes 309 749 194 and Buckland Road to the extent necessary to adequately handle traffic generated .a. by the Gerber Scientific facility. 14. That the developer provide an easement for highway purposes, to the State of Connecticut, where the development's property abuts the existing Route 194 right-of-way line, as shown on ! the above referenced plan. Div. of ROW File No. 132 mi sc 32 Town of South Windsor Gerber Scientific " Route 194 STC No. 132-8812-01 Page 3 15. That all work within the State's right-of-way be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit by the Department's District I Office. 16. That all work on roadways owned and maintained by the Town of South Windsor be performed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the Town of South Windsor. i 17. That all drainage requirements be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of an encroachmet permit by the Department's District I Office. t 18. Where utilities are to be relocated, the utilities shall be moved in compliance with current Department of Transportation policy and at no cost to the State. a 19. That within sixty (60), days of the issuance of a State Traffic Commission Certificate, a copy thereof together with this report be recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with the attached procedure. i 20. That all signs and pavement markings conform to the standards contained in the latest edition of the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways". 21. That the State Traffic Commission reserves the right to require additional improvements or changes, as deemed necessary by the developments traffic in the future. The cost of any additional improvements or changes shall ae borne by the owner of the development. The above conditions were reviewed with Sgt. Thomas Hart on November 17, 1989 and on behalf of Chief Gary Tyler, Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, he concurred with all items except No. 7. The Town feels Gerber Scientific should equitably participate in condition No. 7 and not be fully responsible. Mr. Steve Mitchell , the developers authorized representative, was informed of the above recommendations on November 17, 1989 and concurred with all items except Nos. 7, 12, 13 and 21. RE: CERTIFICATE 993 STc REPORT 132-88 2-01 DIY. OF ROW FILE NO. 132 misc. 32 a 1. STC CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY AND/OR RIGHTS ' TO THE STATE OF COMECTICUT The Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Wav_ has established a file and file number as shown above for the transfer of rights and/or property required by the subject State Traffic Commission certificate. A. The applicant will have a reproducible mylar conveyance map prepared to A-1 standard and the format of the Department of Tyansportation, signed and sealed. The conveyance map shall conform to 12"xl8", 1811x24" or 2411x36" filing sizes as set forth by the Connecticut General Statutes. The Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way's file number shall be shown on the map. B. The applicant will submit a copy of the mylar to the Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Richts of Way for review of its conformance to the Right of Way condition set forth by the State Traffic Commission certificate. C. Upon the approval of the map, the applicant will have a certificate of title prepared certifying ownership of the property and listing all encumbrances on the property. D. The applicant will then have a deed and/or instrur►nent prepared conveying the property and/or rights to the State of Connecticut and submit that proposed deed and/or instrument, the original certificate of title, and proposed partial releases of encumbrances to the transfer, to the Department's Office of Rights of Way for review and comments. E. Upon approval of all documents and the map, the applicant will proceed to have the instruments and partial releases executed then submit them to the Department's Office of Rights of Way for recording in the land records and storage. Sent To: Division Chief Administration Division Office of Right of Way CT. Dept. of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 (203) 258-3349 *** It is important to note that no deeds and/or instruments should be executed without Department review first. OVER REV. 9/89 -2- - 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MONUMEENTING AND MAPPING OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY THE _ STATE OF CONNECTICUT IN COITION WITH THE STC CERTIFICATE. J A. The applicant shall have a Land Surveyor, licensed by the State of Connecticut mark the taking line and set Connecticut Department of Transportation boundary monuments (to be furnished by the State) at all angle points in the line. B. A class A-1 survey map shall be prepared on reproducible mylar showing the complete outline of the parcel to be acquired by the State; said map to be signed and sealed by the licensed surveyor. This is the same map referred to in Section 1, Paragraph A of these requirements. C. The above required monumenting and mapping shall be done in accordance with the Connecticut D.O.T. manual entitled "Specifications for Monumenting and Mapping of State Highways". REV. 9/89 s� r REPORT OF FINDINGS GERBER SCIENTIFIC 0 ROUTE 194 ? TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR SITE DESCRIPTION :- Gerber Scientific has proposed a 302,300 square foot expansion of their existing 97,700 square foot facility on Route 194, Sullivan Avenue, in the Town of South Windsor (see attached site se location map) . The expanded 400,000 square foot facility will hoice light manufacturing, research & development, warehousing and e Kennedy Road space. Access to the site will be via one drive, ophaoff posi of South onto Route 194. The expansion of Gerber Windsor Planning and Zoning approval. ehi S G RATED TRAFFIC: The site is expected to generate 274d6trfice trips on an average day. The anticipated peak hour generate wil l be 373 vehicles (306 enter, 67 exit) in the am and 350 vehicles 74 enter, 276 exit) in the pm. The expected directional dto theu is 18� to the west and 82% tion east. of site traffic onto Route 194 The generated volumes and directional distribution has been reviewed and approved by the Bureau of Planning. UNV ONS PAC 194 (Sullivan Avenue) : Route 194 is a arterial / collector roadway that begins at it's intersection with U.S. Route 5 74 and and terminates at it' s intersection with Ro988sADT�for Buckland Road (Wapping Five Cnrthesvic Vicinity of Routes 30 8� , Route 194 is 16,200 veh/day i 74, 13, 500 veh/day in the area of the proposed anddriand 15, 900 veh/day as it nears U.S. Route 5. posted speed limit on Route 194 varies from 40 to 4530ph. Route 194 has signalized intersections rce Roadth , Sullivan Buckland Road, Sand Hill Road, Avenue Shopping Center and U.S: Route 5. Theasite existing generated traffic is noteth�ted to s exacerbate of Route 194. traffic conditions on the However, the traffic will have an impact on operations ssat several of the above mentioned signalized in (see below) . Rout 194 / Route 30 / Route 74 / Buckland Road Intersection: is is a signalized five leg intersection that is ntly over capacity during both the am and pm peak hours. Th expansion of Gerber Scientific will add anadddite� to 188 vehicles in the am Pew and 176 increase vehicles n pm is traffic will have an this intersection. The adverse impact on traffic operations at this location. Due to the difficult geometry of this location, it is not practicabl for this developer to und o take f ett a impact improvements that would be r quired to of site generated traffic. Th ref or it is recomm nded ' that the developer equitably participat in funding for future improvements, to this location, to the ext nt necessary to adequately handle traffic generated by the expansion of the Gerber Scientific facility. Route 194 / Sand Hill Road Intersection: This is a T type intersection and is controlled by a semi actuated traffic signal. All three legs of this intersection have two lane approaches The Route 194 legs have one thru lane and an exclusive turn lane. The site generated traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on this intersection. Route 194 / Pierce Road Intersection: This intersection is T type with a semi actuated traffic control signal. The signal is interconnected with the signal at the Route 194 - Sand Hill Road intersection. Northbound Route 194 has a 12 foot wide exclusive left turn lane and a 12 foot wide thru lane. Southbound Route 194 and Pierce Road have 12 foot wide one lane approaches. Analysis using projected 1991 external traffic conditions indicate that this intersection will be over capacity during peak traffic hours. The development will add 299 vehicles in the am peak and 279 vehicles in the pm peak hour. To address- this 12% - 15% increase in traffic it is recommended that a right turn lane for southbound Route 194 and a two lane approach for Pierce Road be constructed. These improvements will effectively offset the development' s impact at this location. It is understood that the developer of Gerber Scientific is responsible for the aforementioned widening of Pierce Road. However, prior to completion of the full-build Gerber Scientific complex, if there are other developers in the area, subject to State Traffic Commission review, which would impact the relevant traffic loads of the subject intersection, those development' s will be reviewed by the State Traffic Commission and may be required to equitably participate in the Pierce Road widening. Rout 194 / Sullivan Avenue Shopping Center Intersection: This four leg intersection has recently been reconstructed by the Town of South Windsor. Route 194 has an exclusive left turn lane and a thru / right lane in each direction. The side roads have been realigned to provide a more conventional four leg intersection. Analysis indicates that the site generated traffic will not have a substantial impact on traffic operations at this location. :b Yt {t it k 1 I V e 194 / Site Driv / Kennedy Road Int rs ction: Currently this is a four leg intersection that has stop control on th sid streets. With the addition of the site generated traffic the peak hour warrant for signalization will be met. ' However, this is the only warrant that is met and thei disruption of traffic flow on Route 194 is not expected. Therefore, the installation of a traffic control signal is not recommended at this time. It is recommended that if the installation of a traffic control signal becomes necessary, the developer be responsible for the installation. In order to accommodate the increase in traffic the developer will widen Route 194 to provide for a northbound exclusive left turn lane at the site drive. The site drive will also be widened to provide a two lane approach to Route 194. Route 194 / Rye Street Intersection: this is a T type stop controlled intersection. Review shows that the development will increase traffic at this location by approximately 2%. G The generated traffic is thru traffic and is not expected to have a significant impact on traffic operations at this location. ' Route 194 / U.S. Route 5 Intersection: This is a four leg signalized intersection that currently operates at an acceptable level of service during peak hours. The development's traffic will have an impact on the northbound U.S. Route 5 right turn movement. To offset this impact the developer has proposed the construction of a northbound right turn lane. However, due to difficulties with right-of-way it has been determined that this improvement can not be pursued at this time. It is recommended that the developer equitably participate in any future project to construct this improvement. r ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE The lat st three year accident experience for Route 194 in the vicinity of the development was reviewed and no accident pattern or trend was discovered. The U.S. Route 5 - Route 194 and Route 30, 74, 194 and Buckland Road intersections are No 345 and 557 on the 1985 - 1987 SLOSSS. These locations have been reviewed and the additional traffic generated by the development is not expected to exacerbate conditions. at` r P PROPOSED Project 132-100: This planned pro ject ect will provide for major•wid ring cklaad Road from the Manchester Town Life to of Bu €. Route 30. Tentative advertising date is 03/ the relocation of 1400 feet of Proj ct 132-102: This Project proposes1200 Route 74 to intersect with Roladvertising date feet north of Route 30. Tentative is O1/91. .a RECOMMENDED IMEROVEMENTS The developer has recom mended the improvements outlined in conditions No. 1 6 and 12 as listed in State Traffic Commission Repo 132-8812-01. TRAFF IC E G ER NG R CO N ED I ROVE M E N-T—S The Office of Tra ffic is Engineering agrees with the improvements and items prop os d by the developer and also recommends Report o. 132-8812-01. - 26 as listed in State Traffic omID and the Town of South Windsor are in Th Of f is of Traffic Enginearin g agreement with the above conditions. However, the Town feels that the d velop r shou ld not be fully responsible for but-on y equitably y i at in the improvements to the Route 1esentative agreed pith partic P iatersection. The developer' s authorissdoreRepo� NO- 132-8812-01 all conditions of State Traffic Comm �# xc pt No. 7, 12, 13, and 2 4 .*t tom; �•� t j .,• 1 =� RYE ST IJ /FrTCH ry• j '� •� D �r R SC I ENT 1 j �� .,,44�. AV .'BRICK BRICK , CCU •,,/�i �� .. _d I Y � PROCEDURE FOR FILING CERTIFICATES ON LAND RECORDS Within sixty (60) days of the issuance of the Certificate, a copy thereof together with the Traffic tInvhe estigation Report is to be recorded, n cost the land records of the tate of Connecticut, by the applicant on municipality in which the parcel of land encompassed by the Certificate is located. F. i If the subject premises are situated in more than one ate municipality, a duplicate original of the Certificate and the Traffic Investigation Report must be by the applicant, at no cost to the State of Connecti- cut, on the land records of each 'municipality. I The municipal clerk shall list the "State of Connecticut" as the grantee of the Certificate in the municipal land record indices. A certified copy of the Certificate and Traffic Inves- tigation Report evidencing the date of recordation must be delivered to the Office of the State Traffic Commis- sion within the above specified sixty-day period. Failure to comply with the above will result in the revo- cation of the Certificate. a, 1 August 1989 t May�k 4 .,� ' �` PREPARED DATE CHECKED", ,,,.DATE. . ra PROJECT NO. FUSS&O NEILL- BY consulting engineers BY �QB SVII.W/Q V AV& SHEET I* o xs IS� All ! I . 07 E 17 74 i , - - -! ITA ---�----f--- I c t 6P — 4--T H-H tl -4 * E -- - 14 0- - E ai -4 -- - -- - 1. 4—: t—r-44 •s,..- a„ ..A�.-_ i--.1..___—n..,.w.. .>.... x..+...ir.�+a�rr.rita.v.o,.m....,.�s.. -�mra.,nalraf+a.-va. ,.�.:<�ewm�An....+r FO-#110 FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED,• DATE.�: PROJECT NO. consulting engineers BY BY " _,, ;;��• •�SHEETIO of I ra � 1 ; :� 1 � � i , � � 1 I � ` • '-T i- Tj FT_ I i - '-T"-47T71 f4 3 ------I_ —L-IJ L' I _LJ i Er IV ii i i 3 i j � F �- , i ` t f- - T FO-#110 PREPARED DATE CHECKED =; FUSS&O'NEILL- PR DATE 'PROJECT NO.. * ., consulting engineers BY y1t, BY ems^ � -o q SHEET 4 WNW ofp Fri 'tz a -. - - -- 11L4 - -- _ 4--t t _ a i i a IT ? - --- -;- t - - ar.!a.i.r . W,.......-�nr..r .a +s Wws.n.w.1 dr ar ...•.z ®.wll .i ++. FO-#110 ' �` PREPARED DATE CHECKED:a. `..DATE ;: :PROJECT NO: FUSS&O NEILL P i7 BY BY consulting engineers moon SHEET NO. Lt of77 0 r -T-7 00 a1 + 740 — - 4 till '7a to G --�---} --+ 1 -fi 4 --�- - �� 7406 - - --�- it 4 --•--F- -j �- -- - �-- - - -4- - + - , 4- - - ---d - -- — I ( ! y ! y , I n--.�.�a_w.,elxk .+-rrcb`Yw.=-wr+•Aw-.�vwcriw'f un. a-s...a..�s+.^«, - a"R�-`"V.Mwr R.�.w'tseK9Yr++�.''M498-M1 ..e} aM+',.-E4nb4�-.v.-�^s n w.+:eiFlT•aR.4-- <,..�-v,�u -, ' FO-#110 PRERED BY: DATE: " NBLL SH.NO. -� TIcuY • ��A HEVS ER. CONNEC •�b= •i ._ —r ,, e}1 l��i.�iv1J'f^ t*.a• uvli/. x.�e. �h—��'i�c mow^ �t • }�. 'C" I1 4* ;.,-tri;tL CHECKED DATES NM . i :. ANALYSIS ae8� GUTTER FLOW AN .. . ^^ n I Entering Catch 9 7' M L� [`� M Vj _ /, , i • - Basin _ • - 1 Al Bypassing Inle � 1 0 Bypassing Inlet n ' :1 i dth of Flow - Depth of Flow at gutter 4� { _ w Cross Slope of _ _ O z Shoulder '0 LL. 3 a 3 r J Grade of Gutter v4 •. - -.m14. C to Inlet Y V —' . - h S fv1 M -`- r' M rJ I rainfall Intensity 3� Total Al 1 � Sum of Al r jr _ Al p ® O O A 4O �� ire Runoff Coefficient , - - - • O M N I•It S — . . .� Area in Acres 7 s (! r Time to Inlet Inlet Number — rl �(?- EP ARED eY -'�.,,•DAT E:: f' FUSS&�'NEil.L a=�' � YAMCHESTER. C KMECTIGUT y CHECKED 8Y: DATE: DROJ,N0. STORM SEWER SYSTEM % - TOWN DESIGN S'L�t.L.1VA4N & SO, UJ1 Nhca N, o i HEA01•:ATER FULL CAPACITY r s r. rba AVERAGE VELOCITY X ao 1 0- 1 b' SLOPE a $ p o p ) 1. 0 ry nl 4 cJ r4 t� 9 LENGTH OF PIPE • O .� —.00" 1-01 r� �- ri r PIPE SIZE � kA �.� 1, � � - �.� �.� � ,�� .•� ' 0 1 N SYSTEM. rj - A 4 t J RAINFALL I NTENS 1 Y. SU1: OF A l I N (: M 40 7. . � l ', SYSTEH = �4 ^r ,"� 1' � j- J M Al ENTERING T M .. M rj CATCH EAS IN ACCUMULATED TIME V° i T 11-:E IN PIPE TIME TO INLET � � � � � � V^ � LINE SEGMENT rj krs -L--J i �'`' r •� i Agog EPA RED, BY: .oA-E: f' FUSS&0'1, EiLl.: ., t i f •F V-�`� II_Z2_�`�.,' wig�_/' YAMCHESTER. COMNECTICU? .• 1 ' CHECKED 8Y: DATE: � _ VROJ.NO. ,gr� � STORM SEWER SYSTEM To•NN.- - -.;_.,. •_._._ _ - � - �S V t-l.w A►IJ V b, � � oESI�N SO t,v lup �o HEADWATER - r ' FULL CAPACITY T M ,� AVERAGE VELOCITY1 it a a- N -4 El q SLOPE LENGTH OF PIPE . � � � [n a O � � .,; •+ �'- V .; 1' r ni �- 6o O i PIPE SIZE '�� ��� ,T � � � O . r� M r 0 IN SYSTEM .00 • - �.n -M r 1 RAINFALL INTENSI Yr �:, r �•. ` " SUN OF Al IN ^ � SYSTEM � -- � - i-J to O iY Al ENTERING r CATCH CAS1N T r 1 ^ ACCUMULATED T 1 NE ' i TIME IN PIPE TIME TO INLET �n � LIVE SEGMENT. I _ N t 1111111111111111111111 11111111111111111!1111 11�l11�1111111111111111 11�11�1111111111111111 11�11�1111111111111111 IL we GUTTER FLOW ANALYSIS WWI- Entering Catch ! Basin 0 Bypassing Inlet Depth of Flow at putter ' �IIAII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Grade of Gutter Rainfall Intensit yl miss 191111111111111111 ���1��1111111111111111 ��iiiiii'iii�ii ONE �` _ O FUSS&O NEILL— PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. consulting engineers �r BYa BY 44 V LL I VA IV AV SHEET NO. of JSI�Lf L _ __ I .✓_i _ - _ T 74L. t ! I D y kc -, - -; - --H- -�- 4 - ---4--- 9--- - -� - ( -7 Lt, tk a e-_5 •� , 3 ft � � 1 i 1 i i f r 4 i 4 - ' f J.I - - o LO 1 _d- �_ --fit ,.fir' -�� ri.��- ! i�.. � �� _ .._�► e FO 4 110 Cow,- A FUSS&O'N.BLL consulting engineers December 20, 1989 yi. Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director �E�V�Q State R� State- of Connecticut RECEIVED Traffic Commission 24 Wolcott Hill Road DEC 2 #-2 1989 p,0. Drawer A Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 State Traffic Commissicn Re: Gerber Scientific South Windsor, CT Certificate No. 993 :a- Mr. S k-eckert: _g site plan approval from the Gerber Scientific, Irc. is pursuing n on Town of South Windsor for Building No• 2, as shoand when master plan. This building will be 90,000 S. • las ,. m leted, the Gerber site will then total 187,o00theFbasiseofe cop�. " recall that the STC issued Certificta1s No. 4009000 S.F. the completed Master Plan, which to Gerber Scientific is planning to construct tcate No. 993roadway, along Route 194 improvements, stipulated in Certif1with this building . This at their site drive in conjunction pacts improvement will be made in order to m heinimize fuledetombegin in traffic along Route 194. Construction is sc the Spring of 1990. Inclu,..ed in the certificate as Item No. 7, is the Widenfng Of Route 194 and Pierce Road. We are requesting, on e halGe rber Scientific, permission to operate this 90,000 Srequest building without compliance with condition atNthis time, due to that this improvement not be co ro osed 90,000 S•F- the minimal traffic impa t hat t e prop The attached Table and building will have on this Figure indicate the number of trips expected and the distribution of these trips along Route 1 94. improvements at the Sullivan Avenue and Pierce than site The p development intersection will be pursued as the develop continues. 146 HARTFORD ROAD / M,ANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. E XT. 307 •;:;CSION ,,GNTROL• .VATER SYSTEMS•-IYOROLOG'e and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING r ► •WASTE ,Y�T�n. YS .MS •HYDROGEOLOGY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT r 'RAF-",C• PUBLIC'NORKS MANAGEMENT STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS �► TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation ommisA afety r r• ides 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A ;; ; Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 ,,_ 4 Phone : 566-5228 JAN 1990 South Windsor January 22pialA% & Zoning Commissloo Gerber Scientific Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Sir: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Sullivan Avenue - Route 184 Town of South Windsor Attached is a copy of Traffic Investigation Report 132-8912-05 detailing 'conditions to operate the subject facility without full compliance to the Certificate. This report is being forwarded to you as a result of the investigation conducted by the Department of Transportation and approval by the State Traffic Commission. Very truly yours , AL i am W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria / Planning and Zoning Commission Fuss & O'Neill An Equal Opportunity Employer Patrick J. Bush STATE c=cONNccnCUT S.T.C. No. 132-8912-05 Report By p-PARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION Date 1/90 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc.No. Checked By Barbara B. Ri coz i REPORT TO THE Date to S.T.C. -i 1990 STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Date 1/90 TOWN South Windsor Received By S.T.C. LOCATION Gerber Scientific Date JAN 1990 Route 194 Approved By S.T.C. REQUESTED BY Date JAN 17 1990 S.M. No. Gerber Scientific See Previous S.T.C. Report HOW REQUESTED Letter . ge 41� No. 132-8812-01, Cert. No.99 DATE 12120189 Executive Secretary Recommendations It is recommended that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate an additional 90,000 square feet, for a total of 187,700 square feet, without compliance to condition Nos. 7-9 of previously issued Certificate No. 993. All other conditions of Certificate No. 993 remain valid. -Sgt. Thomas Hart was informed of the above recommendation on January 8, 1990 and speaking on behalf of Chief Gary Tyler, Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, he concurred. Mr. Robert Bass, the developer's authorized representative, was informed of the above recommendation on January 8, 1990 and he concurred. Existing Conditions: In November of 1989 Certificate No. 993 was issued for the Gerber Scientific development on Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) in the Town of South Windsor, to expand the existing 100,000 square foot facility by 300,000 square feet. In a December 20, 1989 letter, the developer's representative requested that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate 90,000 square feet (for a total of 187,000 square feet) of the proposed 300,000 square foot expansion without compliance to Condition Nos. 7-9 of Certificate No. 993. Condition Nos. 7-9 require the developer to make improvements to the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection. Review indicates that the 90,000 square foot addition will generate an additional 107 vehicles (88 enter, 19 exit) in the a.m. peak and 85 vehicles (18 enter, 67 exit) in the p.m. peak. The increase in traffic at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection due to the 90,000 square feet is 82 vehicles in the a.m. and 59 vehicles in the p.m. While the additional traffic will impact traffic operations at this location, an unacceptable level of service is not anticipated. Therefore, it is recommended that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate an additional 90,000 square feet, for a total of 187,700 square feet and 515 parking spaces without compliance with condition Nos. 7-9 of State Traffic Commission Certificate No. 993. BYap OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS *AXZ a wAKuw REID and RIEGE, P.C. j►MOuUmm `'` ru►tswm C.amass vdIOCT AT LAW (J M �r m.JIL AAtIRRcs T w wd^UR= CM WrATS IRWT `j UL M .q/C7 M lu+wc J A N 2 C 1990 BRAND MATMARD A•UnAJrJL 1R F.RC.RRTs RrorAM L.Cons IWITIORD. OS103-31AS oas n n r P.N1tVOCG O s.BocrsUM ) A MQw (M)279.1190 LEGAL `SC1&'ZN 1 w.t JOHN M pew i.D'ww1C�C +'L .s�a�,«, MlJli�l.r TILKAM ae NO.(2w)240-Wo �TML aon 69^00 n s.MwusTw R T v."rm RECEIVED o�u i.t SY.A. I"^"1.lv4U.L^ 11�Y wAa�sum MAR 199 SCOMT M.w " MARK X.KTAN FACILITIES MANAGER '��,o:; ).sawom - ,ow+K-R m January 12, 1990 DAVW M.S.01^213+ TMo%ws C.WK0M COMM S.0000Rioos •wowTTm a oc aar Mr. William W. Stoeckert , State of Connecticut Traffic Commission Department of Transportation P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, CT 06109 Re: Gerber Scientific Facility - Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor Dear Mr. Stoeckert: In accordance with your letter to Gerber Scientific, Inc. of November 27, 1969, I am enclosing a copy of Certificate No. 993 which has been recorded in the South Windsor Land Records. This copy has been certified by the South Windsor Town Clerk's office. Would you please acknowledge receipt of this document by signing below on the enclosed copy of this letter and r6turning it to me in the enclosed envelope. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, REID and RIEGE, P.C. &wz?,,- Sharon S. Spinelli Legal Assistant sss/Enclosures cc with enclosure: Cal M. Kaplow, Esquire I hereby acknowledge receipt of the above-described document. Willia toeckert January 1990 w N tF, y T_0 014CS (�• O � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 ��osoR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 4, 1990 Mr. John L. Decker 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Application #90-19P Gerber Scientific Dear Mr. Decker: Attached is a copy of comments from the Planning and Engineering Departments regarding the above-referenced application. Please make the necessary revisions to the plans and submit 6 complete sets (including architectural elevations, landscaping plans, etc. ) to the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding the comments or the procedure, please contact me. Very truly yours, } Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning cc: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer GERBER SCIENTIFIC II Planning Department Comments 1 . at the meeting with staff a profile was shown indicating the distance from the building to where the buffer must be placed. Please provide that profile for the Commission to decide at what time the buffer must be installed. 2 . screening must be provided around the dumpster pad 3. a side yard should be shown in addition to the buffer on the easterly side of the site Architecture amd Design Review Comments & Suggestions 1 . architecture compatible with existing structures; parking areas good with islands 2 . the committee suggests some trees along the east side of the front parking area to break up the appearance from Sullivan Avenue "tow N sE q4 QD r 07400� �• e � 4f , � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 e-coy' AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 3, 1990 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer 9z RE: Gerber Scientific - Sullivan Avenue We have reviewed the plans dated 3-7-90 for the proposed Gerber Scientific Site Plan and have the following comments: The following comments were discussed with Mr. Glenn Myrtle of Fuss & O'Neill and are still outstanding. 1 . Additional information is required to show that the proposed 24" impervious clay layer for the new detention basin is sufficient. We have asked for calculations showing that the clay will not "blow out" due to the groundwater pressure. 2 . The existing 12" RCP carrying stormwater from Schwier Road a. We would like to request that this be connected into Manhole #23 to eliminate a constant source of problems . (The Town will also require a right to drain from Gerber. ) b. We request that a 20 foot easement be granted to the Town of South Windsor over this existing 12" RCP so that the Town can maintain the pipe. 3. The temporary connection of the existing 24" clay pipe near catch basin #12 should be defined - i.e. a detail showing how the connection is to be done. Also the manhole (or structure) that connects the "temporary 24" pipe" to catchbasin 13 is not identified by number or name. The following are additional comments: 4. Sheet T1. Are the 6" underdrains shown between the existing building and the proposed building (Phase II) existing or new. If they are new, it is suggested that the 6" underdrain closest to the proposed building tie into Manhole 22 rather than the existing 15" RCP. 5 . The existing 24" clay pipe endwall is shown on the drawing (Tl) but there is no note indicating if it will remain or be removed. 6 . An existing pipe is shown South of the proposed 54" endwall (sheet T-1) . This pipe is not identified except with an invert. Is this to remain? If so, is the runoff shown in drainage calculations for the pond? 7 . Access to the proposed detention pond is not defined either for construction or for maintenance once facility is established. Since access is through wetlands, this should be addressed as part of this application. 8 . Sheet T2 . The endwall (36" Pipe) at end of existing pond is in need of repair. This should be part of this application. Also consideration should be given to add riprap at outlet. 9 . Sheet Dl . The typical parking lot and driveway section shows only a total of 1" of bituminous pavement (1/2" base course, 1/2" surface course) . This seems very thin for a pavement with the amount of vehicles and the subsurface soil conditions on this site. 10 . Sheet D2 . The detail for the standard endwall for the 54" pipe has some inconsistencies. The notes and information shown for the riprap ditch are in conflict between the side elevation and front elevation. With the amount of water being discharged, it would seem appropriate to provide an energy dissipater at this location (such as a plunge pool) . 11 . Sheet D2 . The detail for the culvert end for a 54" pipe shows the toe wall only 2' - 0" deep. It appears that in light of the conditions that exist that this may be a little small for the size pipe utilized. 12 . Sheet D3 . The combination underdrain detail seems incomplete. The bedding for the storm pipe should be brought up to the centerline of the storm pipe as a minimum. JCl/jsv cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works w" "4 F 7-0 01 � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 f~�SOR•c0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 20, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planni g FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer RE: Gerber Scientific - Sullivan Avenue I have asked Mr. Glen Myrtle of Fuss & O'Neill to provide additional information concerning the clay layer they propose to place in the new detention basin. We are currently reviewing the plans dated 3/7/90 and when we recieve and review this additional information, we will forward all of our comments to you. cc: Michael Gantick, Director Public Works D MAR 2, Mo South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY/ CONSERVATION COMMISSION PLAMSING DEPART Ili-HOUSE REFERRAL FORK TO: Jean Zurbrigen, Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, M 1 Stead, Fred Shaw, Thomas Hart, Fire Marshall Lanning, Jim Snow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# Zone T Acreage y �/ Subdivision Site Plante Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial,_ Location: Project Description:' Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No__ (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by �ll�� if you will have comment on this application so that I can follow up with your departm nt when I do a Planning Department report. U PLAMING D$P1,RRTl� ' 'P IN-HDUSE REFERRAL FORK TOO Jean Zu i en Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, M 1 Stead, red Sha , Thomas Hart, Fire Marshall Lanning, n w FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# Zone T Acreage Subdivision Site Plante Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial_ Location: C,4_je i4 j"J",4, A-el J Project Description: l� � -CIA- ��s Future Town-owned property involved? Yes Now (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by L11411,96 if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. A ,,� MEMORANDUM Town - Of South TO: Marcia A. Banach - Director of Planning . W'indsorF Ser eant T. Hart #10 FROM: g 3 DATE. 17 April, 1990 SUBJECT: Project # Gerber Scientific Inc. Police Services No comment at this time. Refer to previous comments on same project. • � i SIGNATURE Sergeant Thomas C. Hart #103 ' Traffic Services APPROVED: e DATE: SLAPS-a (Rev.9i87) e � �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 26, 1990 Mr. John L. Decker 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Application #90-19P Gerber Scientific Dear Mr. Decker: Attached is a copy of comments from the Engineering Department regarding the revised plans dated 4/18/90. Please make the necessary revisions to the plans and submit 6 complete sets (including architectural elevations, landscaping plans, etc. ) to the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding the comments or the procedure, please contact me. Very truly yours, M� u Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning cc: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer Glenn Myrtle, Fuss & O'Neill Ca C V - �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 96074 �r�osolat.co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 25, 1990 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FRON: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer • RE: Gerber Scientific - Sullivan Avenu 90-19P We have reviewed the revised plans dated 4/18/90 for the proposed Gerber Scientific site plan located on Sullivan Avenue and have the following comment: 1 . The following comments from our April 3, 1990 memo have not been addressed: Comments No. 1, 2.a, 2.b, 41 51 6, 71 81 9, 10, 11. JCl/jsv Attachment (Memorandum of 4/3/90) cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Gerber Sdenffr,kv. P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Tel. (203) 644-1551 May 8, 1990 RECEIVED Town of South Windsor MAY 10 1990 1540 Sullivan Ave. So. Windsor, CT 06074HD � �� Att : Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning Dear Ms. Banach: This is to respond to a FAX transmission dated April 26, 1990, sent to my attention containing copy of the Town of So. Windsor memorandum dated April 25, 1990 and April 3, 1990 between the Town Engineer, Jerry C. Iazzetta and yourself. The April 25 memorandum refers to lack of response by Gerber for data and information made on a memo of April 13, 1990. The April 13, 1990 reference memo is actually dated April 3, 1990. It is my contention our response can be more timely, provided we are made aware of these requests at an earlier date. The following are comments or actions we propose to take in addressing the questions referred above. Paragraph 1. The calculations as requested will be forwarded to Mr. Iazzetta the week of May 7, 1990. He may have already received them from Fuss & O'Neill. Paragraph 2. Gerber has taken the position since our initial development of our property, not to interconnect the storm drainage pipes or system from Schweir Road. The rights of drainage predate our ownership. This system drains not only Schweir Road but also additional private property into the pond area. The liability and responsibility of this system remains one of questionble legal issues which we do not feel are related to our site developments plans. If the Town Engineer feels an easement is required in this area, we certainly will cooperate in that regard, provided a) the town bears all liability with respect to the 12" drain including but not limited to the liability and affirmative duty to maintain the pipe, and b) the town attorney will prepare the legal draft of the required easement for review and approval of our Corporate Counsel. • The 24 inch pipe indicated as being relocated around the new building was not sized to carry the referred 12 inch pipe drainage run off as a part of the above directive from Gerber. Paragraph 3. Notations will be made on the drawings to be as noted . Paragraph 4. The underdrains as noted are existing and were placed at the time of the last development. Paragraph 5 thru 12. Additional notes or details will be made on the appropriate drawings as requested. We anticipate new drawings will be submitted regarding the above prior to Monday , May 14, 1990. S car-ely, John L. Decker FACILITIES MANAGER cc: G. Mitchell - Fuss & O'Neill G. Gentile R . Treacy R . Maerz 0 Gerber aug"WIC,hK4 P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Tel. (203) 644 1551 ' ' 81 of ���d t `09T4ay 16, 1990 WOO Soup - o of Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Ave. So. Windsor, CT 06074 Att: Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning RE: Gerber Scientific Inc. Application 90-19P Dear Ms. Banach: We are by copy of this letter submitting six (6) sets of copies of all revised drawings for the Planning & Zoning Commission. Also three (3) sets of copies of the same drawings for the Inland/Wetland Conservation Commission. These drawings have been revised to respond to the town staff comments as noted in my letter to you of May 8, 1990. Every effort has been made to cooperate with these requests of addition or changes. We are hopeful that further detail will not be required to obtain proper approval. If additional copies are required, please advise. Ls erely, ohn L. Decker FACILITIES MANAGER JLD/blj cc: G. Mitchell — Fuss & O'Neill J. MacCahill — Town Enforcement Officer G. Gentile R. Maerz R. Treacy < JiN f4< Ce r T_0�� O-P S.Iau� ?d&U&Ot w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 R,C AREA CODE 203/644-2511 pt� May 24, 1990 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer kAk RE: Gerber Scientific - Sullivan Avenue - #90-19P We have reviewed the drawings dated 4-18-90 which we received on May 17, 1990 for the Gerber Scientific Site Plan and have the following comments: 1 . On April 3, 1990 we stated "Access to the proposed detention pond is not defined either for construction or for maintenance once facility is established. Since access is through wetlands, this should be addressed as , part of this application" . This has not been addressed. , �i" s 2. In response to our comment concerning the existing 36" pipe endwall . (Sheet T2) needing repair, the drawings indicate "Repair or replace existing endwall as required, place riprap at outfall" . a. Who will determine whether the endwall will be replaced? It b. A detail (or specification) is required for the riprap indicating size, etc. 3 . Our comment #11 of April 3, 1990 has not been addressed. It stated "Sheet D2. The detail for the culvert end for a 54" pipe shows the toe wall only 2' - 0" deep. It appears that in light of the conditions that exist that this may be a little -__sm_all for the size pipe utilized" . 4 . Mr. Jo Deckers letter of May 8, 1990 to you indicated Gerbers fee-Ling concerning the connection--of the storm system from Schweir R d into their sys The Town has some grave reservations cons ins} tb ��xxiting storm system and we feel--that a meetings-with Gerber representatives, South Windsor Planning, ,Engineer' , Street Services and Economic Development Departments is essary to arrive at a satisfactory" solution. Until this resolved, we cannot make a recommendation on this application. 'on !C, 4 4 q 0� • _ 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINOSOR. CONN. 06074 ~�soR.00 AREA CODE 203/644-25U Fax. 0 - 203-644-3781 FACSIMILE MESSAGE TRANSMITTAL FORM Date: PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: NAME: ' —�;� ADDRESS: Fuss & O'Neill 146 Hartford Road Manchester, CT FAX. # : 643-6313 MESSAGE FROM: NAME: Michele R. Lipe, Ass't Planner ADDRESS: 1540 Sullivan Ave South Windsor, CT MESSAGE This application will be on the P & Z agenda on 6/19/90. It may be necessary to sit down and talk about comment #4 before that time. NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLQW: 1 AML a GEBGER SCIENTIFIC SITE PLAN 1. Application for a 90,000 sq ft new building (bringing the total building sq ftage to 187,000 sq ft) on a 39 .2 ac site to be located directly south of the existing building located on the southerly side of Sullivan Ave, easterly of Schwier Road, I zone. This is the second building- the master plan for the site indicates that there will be four buildings in all, totalling 400,000 sq ft. 2. Building coverage proposed is 4%; 50% allowed. Maximum impervious coverage is 8%; 65% allowed. 3. There are an additional 164 parking spaces proposed for Phase II totalling 352 spaces This. exceeds what was required under the old regulations (which applies to this site plan) as well as exceeds the criteria for the new regulations. 4 . There are regulated wetlands on the site. The applicant received IWA/CC approval on 5/21/90 recommending a $10,000 and are requiring that the access for the construction of the proposed detention basin shall be limited to the existing dirt road easterly of the basin. 5. There is public water and sewer in Sullivan Ave which will service the site. WPCA approval is not required. However, the Collector of revenue should be notified as to the incremental amount of new developemnt (acreage) for his calculation of the sewer connection charges,--- DEP discharge permit required is flow exceeds 5,000 ga./day. In regards to construction Note #2, Sheet Tl, when new manhole is constructed, the Sup't of Water Pollution Control would like to know what method of by-pass will be employed by the contractor. 6 . This site will be a major traffic generator. The applicant has applied to STC for the whole project and has received approval. Proposed traffic generated for Phase II of this project indicates that there will be 88 cars entering and 19 exiting during the am peak hour and 18 cars entering and 67 exiting during the pm peak hour at the intersection of the site and Sullivan Ave. The other intersection which will be impacted is Sullivan Ave and Pierce Road. There will be 82 cars in the am peak hour and 59 in the pm peak hour. Some of the conditions of the STC approval which will apply with this phase of construction include: - that developer must widen Rte 194 to provide a sheltered left-turn lane, for northbound Rt 194, at the site drive. - the developer construct "emergency access" drive and it be designed and constructed to preclude casual use - the developer eqquitably participate to in any future project to construct an exclusive right turn lane on northbound US Rte 5 at it's intersection with Rte 194 - the developer participate in funding for future improvements at the intersection of Rte's 30, 74, 194 and vuckland Road to the extent necessary to adequately handle traffic generateed by this facility The STC has waived the requirements of widening this intersection of Sullivan Ave and Pierce Road . this phase, however it will be required with subsequent phases . 7 . The landscaping plan is typical for what we have seen for the Gerber site. The site includes 40 trees to be planted in the parking area- varieties include regent scholartree, honeylocust adn gleditsia trees which are being transplanted. Other landscaping around the building include 65 arborvitaes, 6 white pines, 3 hawthorn and a couple areas of ribbon grass. In the deention area they are proposing to plant 5 hawthorns, 15 dogwoods, 25 winterbrerries, sweetflag and cattail. The east side of this property is subject to our buffer requirements as it abutts up to a RR zone. The applicant has indicated to staff that they do not wish to put the buffer in at this time because the building proposed is so far away from the property line. (Hopeful ly-via Vi l l have a profile -wi lbp shown. ) 8. The Architecture and Design Review Board have reviewed the plans and offer the following comments: - architecture compatible with existing structures; parking areas good with islands - the committee suggest some trees along the east side of the front parking area to break up the appearance from Sullivan Ave. A If approved the planning department requests the following modifications: -side yard should be s Qwn in addition to the buffer on the easterly side of the site s�4� e � ca u y 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 CFO_ '� AREA CODE 203/644-25U 22 June 1990 Mr. John Decker 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sir: re: Appl. #90-19P, Gerber Systems Site Plan W are pleased to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on 19 June 1990 to approve the above-referenced application for a site plan of development in accordance with drawing prepared by Fuss & O'Neill on 12/21/89 (revised 3/7/90 including sheets M1-M21 R11 P1-P21 R11 T1-T21 U1-U21 L1-L21 Cl-C3, and D1- D3) and with the following modifications: 1. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 2. No building permits will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk's Office. 3. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of $10,000. 4 . An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 4.13.10 of the Zoning Regulations. 5. Footing drains are required if the building has a basement. 6 . A landscape bond in the amount of $10,000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars . 7 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 8. Access and maintenance to proposed detention pond must b defined on the plans. 9 . A detail or specification is required for the riprap (indicating siz ) for the outfall of the endwall. G rber Systems -2- 22 June 1990 10. The toe wall design must b consistent with the 54 inch pipe size. 11 . A drainage easement and rights to access this easement are to be granted to the Town over the entire 12 inch existing pipe in the northwest corner of the site drainage of the abutting property. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets P1 and P2 with the above modifications, together with four blueprint copies of the entire set of plans, must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk within 90 days. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must b submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISS ON Lo ise C. Evans Chairman cc: Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission M. Banach, Planning Director J. Collins, Chief Building Official J. Iazzetta, Town Engineer F. Shaw, Supt. of Pollution Control E. Belleville, Assessor W. Lanning, Fire Marshal Registrar of Voters Engineer Applicant PZC File ce 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, JUNE 23, 1990 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION At its June 19, 1990 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to take the following action: 1. Approve, with modifications, Appl. #90-24P, Town of South Windsor Board of Education/South Windsor High School, Special Exception, property at Nevers Road - Ayers Road intersection, A-20 zone. i 2. Approve, with modifications, Appl. #90-19P, Gerber Scientific Inc. , site plan, 425 Sullivan Avenue, I zone. 3 . Approve, with modifications, Appl. #90-20P, Oakland Centre Associates, subdivision, property southerly of Oakland Road and westerly of Felt Road, RC zone. 4. Approve, with modifications, Appl. #90-23P, Fairway Estates, 1 lot subdivision, 523 Clark Street, RR zone. 5. Approve the reduction of certain bonds . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Louise C. Evans, Chairman Bernard Hart, Secretary LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL " r o � PLANNING DEPARTMENT ?� TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR °Soe•co�� 1540 SULLIVAN AVE. f� SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 (203) 644-2511 Date �90- TO: WE ARE SENDING YOU: Q1 P&Z initial Plans Q Drainage comps <ME fi1pl an Bond estimate requests t n plans O Bond reduction requests M Final plans for filing 0 Change order form Cp Other O Correspondence Copies App. No. Project l � � THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: Ap For review and comment 0 For you =1 For your use 0 Retu sions =3 As requested O 1� 0 Other 1 12 PLEASE RETURN/COMMENT BY: 91� say ��� COMMENTS: �� c, v Copy to: From: DRAINAGE EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, thatGerber Scientific Inc., a Connecticut corporation (the "Grantor") of 83 Gerber Rd. West So. Windsor, CT 060Z4 for the consideration of ONE ($1. 00) DOLLAR AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, received to its/his/her full satisfaction of THE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut t do give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the *(the said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, its successors and assigns forever, a "Grantee") perpetual right to lay, install, maintain, inspect, operate, construct, use, alter, repair, replace, and remove storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or-storm water or storm drainage systems and appurtenances thereto, in, through, upon and over certain pieces or parcels of land as described in Exhibit A. Within said parcel(s) described in Exhibit A, the Grantee, its/his/her successors and assigns, shall have the right to cut trees and bushes as may be convenient or necessary and to remove structures thereon, and to pass and repass with men and equipment, to operate equipment and install materials incidental to the construction of said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm drainage systems and to excavate and fill, and, if necessary, to alter existing water courses or form embankments over said storm water or storm sewer lines, storm water or storm sewer pipes, or storm water or storm sewer drainge systems. The Grantor herein, for itself/himself/herself, its/his/her successors and assigns, shall not erect or allow to be erected any immobile structures on said easements or rights-of-way and shall not plant or allow to be planted or grown any trees thereon or perform any work thereon within said easements or rights-of- way which may endanger or interfere with said line, pipe or drainage systems. The Grantor herein for itself, its successors and assigns, reserves the right to itself/himself/herself, its/his/her successors and assigns, to continue to use the land within which the aforesaid easements or rights-of-way have been granted for any uses and purposes which shall not in any way interfere with the use thereof by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fulfilling the purpose for which these easements or rights-of-way are granted. The Grantee herein, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to restore and maintain said premises in their original condition as nearly as possible commensurate with the above use upon the completion of any maintenance, operation, construction, replacement or repair work in said easement or right-of-way areas . 2 - The Grantee agrees to hold the Grantor, his/her heirs and assigns, harmless from and against any and all damage to property or person caused by the construction*and/or maintenance and * , use repair of said sewer line. ** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal this day of , 19 0�. Signed, Sealed and Delivered GRAN R: Gerber Sc' ntific, Inc. in the s nce of: -, �� B L. ec a eo a M. G ntile '/V7 A �' 1 - Senior Vice President, Finance uci a -M.. Ignagpi ** The Grantee shall be solely responsible to maintain such storm water or storm sewer STATE OF CONNECTICUT) �\ lines, storm water or storm- sewer pipes, or storm water or storm drainage systems COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) and appurtenances thereto in good condition and repair. On this day of 19 °) c3 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally appear c r vin. '� sU, known to me (or satisfactorily proved) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same for the purposes therein contained. In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand. UAREIANt MY COMidISSW UPIR&S MAfi3rf 3111W Witness Town Manager Date TOWN HALL USE ONLY Approved by Town Engineer Date 4/20/90 GerberSdentific, �jl P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Tel. (203) 644-1551 RECEIVED JUL 30 1W SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPTo July 27, 1990 Ms. Marcia Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 REFERENCE: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Application #90-19P 425 Sullivan Avenue Site Development Dear Ms. Banach, We are transmitting herein, two performance bonds duly authorized, as required for compliance with the Planning and Zoning Commission letter dated June 22, 1990. Bond #11132715548 - Landscaping - Issued date -- July 20, 1990 Bond #11132715555 - Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures - Issued date -- July 20, 1990 We trust you will find this to be in proper order. If further information is requested, please contact me at 644-1551 X4513. Sincerely, 4 L. Decker Facilities Manager CC: Ms. L. Evans, Planning & Zoning Commission Chairperson, Town of South Windsor G.M. Gentile, GSInc R.F. Treacy, GSInc R.J. Maerz, GSInc JLD:j cs attachments I -n Gerber ScIentIft,Inca — P.O Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Tel. (203)644-1551 April 109 1992 Mr. William W. Stockert State of Connecticut Traffic Commission Department of Transportation PO Drawer A Wethersfield , CT 06109 RE: Gerber Scientific Facility Sullivan Ave. — Route 94 Town of South Windsor Dear Mr. Stockert: Confirming our recent conversation, this is Gerber Scientific Inc. request to the Commission to reinstate the State Traffic Commission Permit Certificate #993 for the above site location. This permi t inadvertently expired Nov. 21 , 1991 as the result of our n glect to request an extension in a timely manner. Further enclosed is a sketch indicating a temporary Paved parking layout we are seeking approval for. This will permit paved parking for approximately 80 additional cars. PP As may be a reciated current economic conditions do anothpertit Gerber .to proceed with the planned site development t tme . However, we find that to better utilize our current efacilitying it is necessary to increase the personnel density =fomtrental property to t. This comes about by contracting operations f owned facilities. Hence we would like to have a temporary surface area of of the ' ft. This then requires approximately 26,000 sq. • conditions as stipulated in the original partial specific terms and con A approval of Certificate #993• copy of this approval is attached. yo Please contact my office after you have had a chance rocedureview re to beur file . Perhaps you can advise us as to the prope P pursued. • cer.#ly , John L. Decker FACILITIES MANAGER cc: J. Shemo — Town of South Windsor G. Gentile K. Kaplow - Yam' STATE OF CONNECTICUT +: Commissioner of Tra a on ' �- TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of is Safety Departnlent of Transportation Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield. Connecticut 06109-0801 Phone: 566-5228 i RECEIVED APR 28 199? ,FACILITIES MANAGER April 22, 1992 Mr. John L. Decker Facilities Manager Gerber Scientific, Inc. P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Dear Mr. Decker: Subject: Gerber Scientific Facility t_ Town of South Windsor 1 The State Traffic Commission on April 22, 1992, voted to reinstate Certificate No. 993 for one year. In addition, the Commission approved the paving of eighty additional parking spaces without completion of any of the conditions of the Certificate. ?litamuWy. truly y ur Stoe ckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. John Collins ��,� Spa•�a -��'G .�E�-. An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on rer yr led or rer otered paper y M T TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON J04N L . DECKER Phone No. 64 Address ? 0ERB'ER RD. k�-EST Se . WINDSOR, CT C 5074 Site Name 42� Slit I TVAN AVr SO _ e!T"P,') i�R _PA rT P&Z No. R4�� Owner 0ER3ER, SCIENITIFHI I K . Phone No. 4 .-� �; i Contractor N/A kf, Signature of Owner Date: Signature of Design ''Engr. r 4c_ Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include three (3) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) SEE ATTACHED LETTER Reason for Change: (Why is change required) SEE ATTACIHD LETTER APPROVALS: (As Required) Dir. Of Planning f Date: Town Engineer - � � Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: White - Town Engineer Pink - Director of Planning Yellow - Applicant Gerber Scientik inc P.O. Box 305 Hartford, CT 06141-0305 Tel. (203) 644-1551 May 11 , 1992 Marcia Banach RECEIVED Director of Planning Town of South Windsor MAY 1992 South Windsor , CT 06074 � RE : Gerber Scientific Inc . 0. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. 425 Sullivan Ave . Proposed Paved Parking Area Dear Ms . Banach: Pursuant to our meeting and discussion of May 8, 1992 as regards Gerber need to install a proposed temporary paved parking area attached please find ; 1 ) Three (3) copies of a marked up drawing indicating the approximate size and location of an area proposed to be paved with asphaltic surface . 2) Town of South Windsor Staff Site Change Request Form. It is proposed to pave an area approximately 62 x 400 = 24 , 800 sq . ft . to permit parking for approximately 80 cars . The location is parallel to the existing paved entrance drive . Adjacent to this area is a larger field owned by Gerber and under lease to a local farmer . The farmer is planting a cash crop on the abutting area . We realize this pavement will be temporary and is somewhat out of context with the Master Plan of Developement on file with the town . However , at such time the site developement , as filed , can be implemented the paved area would be adjusted to be consistant with the Master Plan . It was my further understanding that vehicles not be allowed to park in or on the actual driveway . We propose to keep the driveway open since the proposed paving will very much assist in eliminating that problem. This by providing the off driveway paved area . All this is prompted thru Gerber' s need to better utilize its existing facilities . Economic conditions do not permit development of the Master Plan . However , due to reorganization and reassignment of operations it has become necessary to increase our personnel density within the building at the Sullivan Ave . location. We are hopeful that with future product developement and business growth in the market place our profitability will permit us to once again move into a growth need position. Hence the Master Plan Developement could come back into play. Your timely review of this request would be appreciated . We would like authorization for a permit if such is required to permit early solicitation of contractor bids to perform the needed work . We would like to get on the sucessful bidders early spring schedule . Pn er l L. Decker FACILITIES MANAGER cc: J. Shemo G . ' Gentile Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. A Gerber Scientific Company h d May 2, 1995 M Ay 4 1995 South Windsor Town of South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission Planning and Zoning 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Gerber Scientific Inc. To: Planning and Zoning Board: Proposed project at 425 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, CT, your Docket#90-19, we would request a 5 year extension on this proposal. Sincerely avid Soule acility Manager CAD Systems Division 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 TEL(203)871-8082 <0'N SE,< co) s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 soe•cor� May 25, 1995 David Soule, Facility Manager Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. CAD Systems Division 425 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Soule: Re: Site Plan Approval #90-19P, Gerber Scientific, Inc. 425 Sullivan Avenue ed to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on May 23, 1995 to p years. All conditions We are leas Y extend the approval of the above-referenced site plan for an addition,five (5) a . Al date is e PP of the original approval letter dated June 22, 1990, remain 1n effectexpiration June 19, 2000. A new black and white transparent mylar of sheet P1 and P2, together with 3 blueprint of copies, 1e of be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. eapproval this Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. � in After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you rfilio the e Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted Planning Department. Very truly yours, pL G & ZONING CO SSION t' ussell G. Levack, Chairman RGL/pmm cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal ASST.TOWN CLERK MAY 2 4 1995 LEGAL NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, MAY 27, 1995 SOUTH WINDSOR - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION At its May 23, 1995 Regular Meeting, the Commission voted to take the following actions: 1. Approve a five (5) year extension for appl #90-19P, Gerber Scientific Site Plan of Development, Sullivan Avenue, I zone 2. Approve with modifications appl #95-09P, L. Investors, LLC - Resubdivision of ± 14 acres to create 18 lots to be known as Cliffwood Estates on property located on the easterly side of Lawrence Road and northerly of Cliffwood Drive, A-30 zone 3. Approve appl #95-13P, Magdalene & Anthony D'Angelo - Zone change from I zone to GC zone on ± 4.40 acres on property located at 589 Sullivan Avenue 4. Approve appl. #92-50P, Avery Meadow DRZ - settlement proposal for pending litigation on property located on the west side of Avery Street, DR Zone 5. Approve the settings/reductions/callings of certain bonds Russell G. Levack, Chairman 07/06/00 15:59 22860 561 4574 M.J.NEIDITZ CO. 1@ 001/001 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LEASING MANAGEMENT NEITZ INSURANCE D � 1925 r1c 62oao SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS BUILDING FOR TOMORROW TZ TO: � From ��z�uc.! All, , Fax. i'11V 7o? g'0 Pages: / (includingthis covers heat.) Ph ne: Date: 7lC 2aod Re: 6;rpbe4. 1.94rG 4hj;c .�^�• --�� �,�.yvd Sc',��' �Royr� �i/�.y,�.y�Rr�/ .sue A- i�i a i ❑Urgent ❑For Review ❑Please Comnsent ❑Please RePly ❑Hard Copy To Follow Comments: �, - �� . -- /7A A67 THE INFORWTION CONTAINED IN TI-9S MESSAGE SENT BY TELEOOPIER IS LEGALLY PRMLEC,ED AND/OR oONFlDENTIAL INFOrtMATlpv WENDED ONLY FQR THE USl;OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR I4ITITY NAMED ABOVE. 1F THQ FEADER OF THIS MES&AG,E IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,Yp�l AFti;I-�REgY I,pT1FIED TNA7 ANY DISGASURE, DISSEMINATION. DISTPAuTION, COPYING OR USE OF THIS cOO�W"CATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBRFD_ IF YOU HAVE NOTIFIRECW®TWS COMMUNICATION N HMKEPR Y PLEASE NOTIFY LIS BY -EPHONE AND RETURN THE OWa�IAL Ml:SSACE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VW THE UWTED STATES FosraLSER�nc�. TwwK You. 125 L_ASA1 1 E RoAo WEST HARTMRD.CT 06107 2311 PHONE: (660)561-4570 FAX: (860)561-4574 EMAIL: MJNeidltc@mjn iditz.c m �. Tig O-P s ?d&U140t s G 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•CO�� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 '�OSO July 19,2000 M.J.Neiditz&Company 125 LaSalle Road West Hartford, CT 06107-2311 Dear Mr.Neiditz: Re: Appl#90-19P, Gerber Scientific This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on July 11, 2000, to release the landscaping bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of$10,000. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s) will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Sincerely, Walter J. Mealy, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission cc: Town Engineer i REAL ESTATE G� INVESTMENTS • LEASING • MANAGEMENT INSURANCE W 1L 14=*Z E 10 1925 VIA FACSIMILE & REGULAR MAIL 2000001 July 24, 2000 SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS BUILDING FOR TOMORROW Nall rl Ms. Michele Lipe Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: APPL. #90-19P, GERBER SCIENTIFIC Dear Michele: Pursuant to our conversation of this morning,please mail the landscaping bond for the above referenced project to: Daniel M. Neiditz M. J. Neiditz& Co., Inc. 125 LaSalle Road West Hartford, CT 06107-2311. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Michele L. Sandquist VA Office Manager 125 LASALLE ROAD WEST HARTFORD,CT 06107-231 1 PHONE 860-561-4570 FAX 860-561-4574 EMAIL:MJNEIDITZ MJNEIDITZ.COM �twMst,`� ca r Ole s ?d&UA10t s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•ca'�� AREA CODE 860 /644-2511 August 4, 2000 Ms. Michele L. Sandquist Office Manager M. J. Neiditz & Co., Inc. West Hartford, Cr 06107-2311 Re: Appl 90-19P, Gerber Scientific Landscaping Bond Dear Ms. Sandquist: Enclosed please find the released landscaping bond for the above-referenced project in the amount of$10,000. If you have any questions, please call me at 644-2511, ext. 253. Sincerely, Michele L. Lipe Assistant Planner MRL/dlw O FUSS&CYNBLL consulting engineers March 15, 1990 Ms. Marcia Banach .- Town Planner Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 - RE: Gerber Scientific - Phase II South Windsor, CT Dear Ms. Banach: Pursuant to our telephone conversations, we are submitting three (3) copies of the following information for the subject poject: 1. Traffic Impact Report ( 11-29-88) 2. State Traffic Commission Certificate No. 993 (11-21-89) r 3. Partial Operation Request (12-20-89) 4. Traffic Investigation Report (1-22-90) As you are aware, Gerber Scientific, Inc. applied to the State Traffic Commission (STC) on November 29, 1988, for a Certificate as a major traffic generator. This application requested approval for a 400,000 S.F. Industrial Park with 1065 parking spaces. After a lengthy STC review, a certificate was issued on November 211 1989. The major items required by this certificate include the widening of Sullivan Avenue in the vicinity of the site, the widening of southbound Sullivan Avenue at Pierce Road, future participation for the construction of a northbound right turn lane on Route 5 at Sullivan Avenue, and future participation for improvements at the Five Corners. Subsequently, on December 20, 1989, we requested that the State Traffic Commission permit Gerber Scientific to construct and operate Phase II without compliance with condition No. 7 of Certificate No. 993, widen southbound Sullivan Avenue at Pierce Road. In support of this request, we presented anticipated site _ generated traffic volumes including the distribution of this traffic on the roadway network. 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES 9 SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC•PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY �O Ms. Marcia Banach March 15, 1990 Page 2 On January 17, 1990, Traffic Investigation Report 132-8912-05 was approved by the STC granting permission to Gerber Scientific to operate Phase II without implementing conditions Nos. 7, 8 _ and 9 of Certificate No. 993. - We believe that the enclosed information supports our finding that the approval of Phase II will not adversely impact Sullivan Avenue traffic even without full compliance with Certificate No.993. Should you have any questions or require any additional data, please call. Very truly yours, we Robert V. Bass 6ekenF. itchell, P.E. Transportation Engineer Aiate Director of Traffic Engineering RJB/j d 85-350 0308A90RJB1 c7�` ,7cy I ._ • STATE OF CONNECTIC LT - MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSIONL�___Coa=issioner Commissioner-of Transportation Y� Department of Transportatio of Public Safety ominissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone: 566-5228 January 22, 1990 Gerber Scientific Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Sir: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Sullivan Avenue - Route 184 Town of South Windsor '— Attached is a copy of Traffic Investigation Report 132-8912-05 detailing conditions to operate the subject facility without full compliance to the Certificate. This report is being forwarded to you as a result of the investigation conducted by the Department of Transportation and approval by the State Traffic Commission. Very truly yours, Will am W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Planning and Zo ing Commission Fuss & O'Neilly An Equal Opportunity Employer Report By Patrick J. Bush a C'CON"-=T S.T.C.No. 132-8912-05 DEPART MENT OF TFwyS:'ORTATION Date 1/90 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc.No. Checked By Barbara B. Ri coz i REPORT TO THE i Dare to S.T.0 1990 STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION . — Date 1/90 TOWN South Windsor Received By S.T.C. LOCATION Gerber Scientific Date JAN 11 1990 Route 194 — Approved By S.T.C. REQUESTED BY Date JAN 17 1990 -- S.M.No. Gerber Scientific See Previous S.T.C.Report HOW REQUESTED rD Letter No. 132-8812-01, Cert. No.99 DATE 12/20/99 Executive Secretary Recommendations It is recommended that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate an additional 90,000 square feet, for a total of 187,700 square feet, without compliance to condition Nos. 7-9 of previously issued Certificate No. 993. All other conditions of Certificate No. 993 remain valid. -Sgt. Thomas Hart was informed of the above recommendation on January 8, 1990 and speaking on behalf of Chief Gary Tyler, Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, he concurred. — Mr. Robert Bass, the developer's authorized representative, was informed of the above recommendation on January 8, 1990 and he concurred. Existing Conditions: In November of 1989 Certificate No. 993 was issued for the Gerber — Scientific development on Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) in the Town of South Windsor, to expand the existing 100,000 square foot facility by 300,000 square feet. In a December 20, 1989 letter, the developer's representative requested that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate 90,000 square feet (for a total of 187,000 square feet) of the proposed 300,000 square foot expansion without compliance to Condition Nos. 7-9 of Certificate No. 993. Condition Nos. 7-9 require the developer to make improvements to the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection. Review indicates that the 90,000 square foot addition will ' generate an additional 107 vehicles (88 enter, 19 exit) in the a.m. peak and 85 vehicles (18 enter, 67 exit) in the p.m. peak. The increase in traffic at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection due to the 90,000 square feet is 82 vehicles in the a.m. and 59 vehicles in the p.m. While the additional traffic will impact traffic operations at this location, an unacceptable level of service is not anticipated. Therefore, it is recommended that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate an additional 90,000 square feet, for a total of 187,700 square feet and 515 parking spaces without compliance with condition Nos. 7-9 of State Traffic Commission Certificate No. 993. BY OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS - FU5S&C'NEILL Con�iting eng'ineerS `Y 1989 December 20, Mr. William W. Stoeckert - - Executive Director State of Connecticut RECEIVED Traffic Commission 24 Wolcott Ixill Road DEC 2 1g89 P.o. Drawer A Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 State Traffic CornMSS& Re: Gerber scientific CT South Windsor, Certificate No• 993 ;•fir. S tLecke=t= royal from the pursuing site plan apP Gerber Scientific, Irc. is P 2 as shown on their Town of South Windsor for Buiid1 be90,000 S.F. and when please This building w master Plan. Gerber site will then total 993'onOthe basis of ' * completed the the STC issued Certificate No. 9 recall thatwhich totals 400,000 S. . the completed Master Plan, is Tanning to construct the roadway Route 194 -- Gerber Scientific p along stipulated in Certificate No. This improvements, P unction with t acts on at their site drive in conjunction to begin in be made in order to mini mizeture imp improvement Ton will be 394. Construction is scheduled traffic along f 1990. - the Spring s Item Ivo. 7, is the widennof f Included in the certificate a requesting, on behalf do We are Route 194 and Pierce rmission to operate this 90,000 request Perm We req Gerber Scientific, er due to building without compliance with condition No. - ovement not be constructed at this 90S000mS•F- that this imPr act that the propose the minimal traffic imp •ntersection. The attached Table an building will have on this i s expected and the g Fi ure indicate the number oalongpRoute 194• distribution of theme trips e and pierce Road improvements at the Sullivan Avenevelopment of this site The imp pursued as the d intersection will bye continues. ER CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2�9. FAX. EXT. 307 146 HARTFORD ROAD / M,4�NCHEST - - - .T;0JL. .A ER S,eSTEMS..4 rO•R OLOG'(anb DRABGE SYSTEM S SITE PLANNING -E; YST PUSL'C .VORKS MA.4AGEMENI0 NYO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT.NA 'E'.V � ono -RAF:C OGY _ - STATE OF CONNECTICUT ' "= ' eomr+waiower of Transportation TRAFFIC COMMISSION eoommueoeror Public Way Department of Transportation eon"S4 W or Mow VehKW% 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Vethessfield, Connecticut 06109 ISSUED November 21 , 1989 CERTIFICATE NO. 993 -- ISSUED TO Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 - FOR Gerber Scientific F=:i 1 i ty Sullivan Avenue - :te 194 Town of South Win: pursuant to Secti:.z 14-311 cf the General Statutes of Connecticut, Ls revised and the Regulations of the S t c e Traff_c Commission Th applicant is hereby o.-= ==z tc comr=s with the conditions and requirements as set = -`� _- a sttacaed repot: and plan .. Failure to comply w_ _ _ :il cond- - �ons and the requirements will constitute sufficient ba-` _ revs c�:+on NO PERSON SHALL OPER 7-E DF77ELOPMEYr OR ANY PORTION TT=—R_r0F UNTIL SUCH TIME AS TE: C:?tom' HAS CO�LIED WITH :"�' nBOV UNLESS PERMISSION HAS _ '.EQ6 ESTER AND RECEIVED F= ..: THrr. STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO L_.::: z PP.IOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL £XP= E Ch-E (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE ISSUED .— UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND R.2QUIREMENTS A?.E COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION is REQUESTED AND OBTAINED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TC EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE. Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be r viewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public saf ty. J.WILLIAM BURNS CHAIRMAN a William W. Stoecke rt Executive Director �L Jr — FUSS&O'NEILL consulting engineers December 20, 1989 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State of Connecticut "- Traffic Commission 24 Wolcott Hill Road P.O. Drawer A -- Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Re: Gerber Scientific _ South Windsor, CT Certificate No. 993 Dear Mr. Stoeckert: Gerber Scientific, Inc. is pursuing site plan approval from the Town of South Windsor for Building No. 2, as shown on their master plan. This building will be 90,000 S.F. and when completed, the Gerber site will then total 187,700 S.F. Please recall that the STC issued Certificate No. 993 on the basis of the completed Master Plan, which totals 400,000 S.F. Gerber Scientific is planning to construct the roadway improvements, stipulated in Certificate No. 993, along Route 194 at their site drive in conjunction with this building This improvement will be made in order to minimize future impacts on traffic along Route 194. Construction is scheduled to begin in the Spring of 1990. Included in the certificate as Item No. 7, is the widening of Route 194 and Pierce Road. We are requesting, on behalf of Gerber Scientific, permission to operate this 90,000 S.F. building without compliance with condition No. 7. We request that this improvement not be constructed at this time, due to the minimal traffic impact that the proposed 90,000 S.F. building will have on this intersection. The attached Table and Figure indicate the number of trips expected and the distribution of these trips along Route 194. The improvements at the Sullivan Avenue and Pierce Road intersection will be pursued as the development of this site -' continues. 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 _ SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATEP SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES•SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTA'iON and TRAFFIC•PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY 200 FUSS&O'NEILL Mr. William W. Stoeckert December 20, 1989 Page -2- We trust this enclosed information will assist in granting relief from condition No. 7 at this time. As always, if you have questions or need additional data, please call. Very truly yours, Robert J': Bass Transportation Engineer smcl Enclosure 85-350 1218A89RJB1 TABLE NO. 1 HOURLY TRIP GENERATION VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT 90,000 S.F. ( ITE LAND USE CODE 130) A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR Enter 88 18 Exit 19 67 Total 107 85 Calculated using methodology described in "Trip Genneration" published by the Institute of Transprotation Engineers ( ITE) in 1987. Average weedday vehicle trip ends = 1, 212 FUSS&oWELLANC. 4:Z). 4 C O rn t g� �� d 2( J- A — L6 Q 3(/0) `p1 S, ir I 0 z V /SSJ AYERS ROAD �� D N Z SITE �� m � N — A N — pP� w SAAO N)L` RflAO� °m000 Q � o �! w .p v v o 4 t 22(5) -W 30 r t to W n s 0 �K AO FIGURE NO. 1 0 .�,0 'tVEtLL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT .- X X X= AM PEAK HOUR (X XX)=PM PEAK HOUR BUILDING NQ 2 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC vERBER SCIENTIFIC eq SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT NOT TO SCALE rROd.NO. 85-350 DATE DEC. 1989 CHECKED BY: .IOSEPH MERRITT i CO STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of p Trans ortation Commissioner of Public Safety Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A IL ow '•••• Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 5228- U • Phone. 566 J64 � J _ ;� �;J LJ~ ✓ f f N 1 9 FUSS e 0'����.���. _ ovember 27, 98 C1A. Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Sir: Subject: Gerber Scientific Facility Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor Certificate No. 993 and Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-8812-01 detailing conditions of the Certificate are enclosed. An encroachment permit must be obtained from the Bureau of Highways - District No. 1 office at 1107 Cromwell Avenue - Town of Rocky Hill prior to performing any work within the state highway right-of-way. In addition., the enclosed procedure for the transfer of property and/or rights to the State of Connecticut should be followed to satisfy Condition -- No. 14, also enclosed is the procedure for filing certificates on Land Records to satisfy Condition No. 19. Very truly yours, fiV William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler .�, Mr. Thomas D'Auria Planning and Zoning Commission Fuss & O'Neill, Inc.K An Equal Opportunity Employer t STATE OF CONNECTICUT ' MEMBERS Commusioncr of Transportation TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commusionerof Public Safny Commiss,oner of Motor Vehicles Department of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A -Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 ISSUED November 21 , 1989 CERTIFICATE NO._99_3 ISSUED TO Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 FOR Gerber Scientific Facility Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor r. pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised and the Regulations of the State Traffic Commission -' The applicant is hereby ordered to comply withrthand conditions and requirements as set forth l attached and the requirements Will _ Failure to comply with all conditions constitute sufficient basis for revocation of the Certificate. NO PERSON SHALL OPERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION THEREOF UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED WITHVED THE AABOVSTATE UNLESS PERMISSION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO OPERATE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE COiv'DITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL £SPIRE ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE DALIED TE WITHIN UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS TED AND OBTAINED FROM T� THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION IS REQUE _. f STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE. Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be reviewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public safety. J.WILLIAM BURNS • CHAIRMAN William W. Stoeckert Executive Director RE: CERTIFICATE 993 STC REPORT 132-8812-01 - DIV. OF ROW FILE NO. 132 misc_ 32 I. STC CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY AND/OR RIGHTS TO THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT The Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way has established a file and file number as shown above for the transfer of rights and/or property required by the subject State Traffic Commission certificate. A. The applicant will have a reproducible mylar conveyance map prepared to A-1 standard and the format of the Department of Transportation, signed and sealed. The conveyance map shall conform to 12"xl8", 18"x24" or 24"x36" filing sizes as set forth by the Connecticut General Statutes. The Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way's file number shall be shown on the map. B. The applicant will submit a copy of the mylar to the Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way for review of its conformance to the Right of Way condition set forth by the State Traffic Commission certificate. C. Upon the approval of the map, the applicant will have a certificate of title prepared certifying ownership of the property and listing all encumbrances on the property. _ D. The applicant will then have a deed and/or instrument prepared conveying the property and/or rights to the State of Connecticut and submit that proposed deed and/or instrument, the original certificate of title, and proposed partial releases of encumbrances to the transfer, to the Department's Office of Rights of Way for review and comments. E. Upon approval of all documents and the map, the applicant will proceed to have the instruments and partial releases executed. then submit them to the Department's Office of Rights of Way for recording in the land records and storage. Sent To: Division Chief Administration Division , Office of Right of Way CT. Dept. of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 (203) 258-3349 *** It is important to note that no deeds and/or instruments should be executed without Department review first. OVER REV. 9/89 -2 r - 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MONUMENTING AND MAPPING OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT IN CONNECTION WITH THE STC CERTIFICATE. A. The applicant shall have a Land Surveyor, licensed by the State of Connecticut mark the taking line and set Connecticut Department of Transportation boundary monuments (to be furnished by the State) at all angle points in the line. B. A class A-1 survey map shall be prepared on reproducible mylar showing the complete outline of the parcel to be acquired by the State; said map to be signed and sealed by the licensed surveyor. This is the same map referred to in Section 1, Paragraph A of these requirements. C. The above required monumenting and mapping shall be done in accordance with the Connecticut D.O.T. manual entitled "Specifications for Monumenting and Mapping of State Highways". REV. 9/89 _f .�4W co"'''V==T S.T.C.No. Repart 8y Patrick J. Bush DEPARIy�TOFTFt�ySPOi�TArTiON Date 11/89 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc.No. REPORT TO THE pate to S.T.C. MY 2 0 1989 Chested By Barbara B. Ricoz i STATETRAFFIC COMMISSION Date 11/89 TOWN South Windsor FL....�ved By S.T.C. LOCATION Gerber Scientific Date WV 20 1969 Route 194 Arc--rved By S.T.C. zEOUESTED BY Oat' w 1 1989 --- �_M.No. Gerber Scientific Sep F:=�.;ous S.T.C. Report HOW RE-2,ESTED APP1 i cati on for Certificate No. DATE 11/29 8� �-::t;�z Secretary 4 Recc endations In accordance with S==pion 14-311 of the Connectic-_ General Statutes, as revised, issue a certifica=: to Gerber Scientific for the -bar Scientific =acility, on Route 194 in the Town of South Windsor, stating =-at the operation, thereof, will not imperil the _a;ety of the public. This recommendation is referenced to the developer's plans entitled: "Roadway Plan, Su11=•r=n Avenue & Site Drive, Gerbe_ -Scientific, Inc. " dated November, 1988 and revised March 7, _y rtrss & O'Neill , Inc. "Sullivan Avenue & ::erce Road, Gerber Scientific' cared October 9, 1989 by Fuss & O'NE::: , Inc. and revised November 'E , 1989 by the Department of Trans:c--tation. This recommendation :s based upon the following c=-cations: 1. That the site =-:ess drive be constructed as :-=wn on the above referenced plane. 2. That the deve':c=e r install and maintain a "S==='' sign, stop bar, double ye',=w center line and lane-use := :rol signs and pavement mark:-_- on the site drive, as sho%.,. _ the above referenced pl . 3. That the deve:c:=r provide and maintain a c'==- sight line of 770 feet or mc•- in each direction, from the 5-�e drive onto Route 194. T-= sight line is to be measures =-cm a point 20 feet back fro- =ie projected edge of Route I _ OFFICE OF - ==r_C ENGINEERING OF HIGHWAYS Town of Sajuth Windsor Ger:.=r Scientific Route 194 STC Me. 132-8812-01 Page 2 devel )per widen Route 194 to provide a sheltered left-turn 4. That the lane, for northbound Route 194, at the site drive, as shown on —= the above referenced plan. 5. That the developer initially install allhehelte signs and pavement re left-turn markings required by the construction of lane on northbound Rout 1949 as shown on the above referenced to the _; -isfaction plan. Upon the compieZ�on of installatioState will maintain of the Department of Transportation, Route 194. the signs and pavement markings o 6. That the developer relocate the "Stop" sign and stop bar on Kennedy Road, as shorn on the above referenced pla- "-_rce Road 7. That the developer widen southbound Route 9nabove referenced to provide two lane approaches, as shown on the plan. rr 8. That the developer 7 ,ally install the signs an: ==vementPierce Road intersection, �= -� markings required b:• re widening at the Route 1!L - shown on the above referent__ plan. Upon _= the De artment the completion of irs��llation to the satisfactic^ - P State will maintain the s:_-: and pavement of Transportation, markings on Route 19�• r--r developer =':ise the existing traffic c� _ �l signal 9. That the P he Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection to �:=^'r`'`revi reviewed at t _ new geometry. Plans -or the signal revision wi . - _ and approved in a __=::af-e report. Y signal becomes necessa-:. for the Route 194 10. That if a traffic ter.-�. of g � _ F._ad intersection, due to the _ ,elopments traffic i c the deve . __ Site Drive/Kennedy _- r will be responsible for t�= 7-,stallation. -" - acce_= ' drive where 11. That the developer cnstructth "emergency that the `�:.�e be designed -- shown on the above referenced plan and constructed tc :-=-clude casual use. - y he developer e=Jitably participate in and -_:uredprosect 12. That t �v- right turn lane on nco:-:oun to construct an er`_fsectionwith Route 194. Route 5 at it's - 13. That the developer e_uitably participate in ful - ,-_ for future 194 and Buckland improvements at tie intersection of Rates har: -raffic generated Road to the exter.= necessary to ad eq Y by the Gerber Sc:=ncific facility. f :rovide an easement for hic-M=_: r 14. That the developeurposes, the State of Cor�:�ecticut, where the develops__c's shownproperty to Route 194 right-of-way line_ a-�� nisc 32 the above referee:.== plan. Div. of ROW File - Town of South Windsor -" Gerber Scientific Route 194 STC No. 132-8812-01 Page 3 15. That all work within the State's right-of-way be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit by the Department's District I Office. 16. That all work on roadways owned and maintained by the Town of South Windsor be performed in accordance with the standards and specifications of t!-_ Town of South Windsor. 17. That all drainage requ:r--ments be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of an enc roachmet permit the Department's District I Office. 18. Where utilities are to -t�e relocated, the utilities shall be moved in compliance with current Department of Transportation policy and at no cost the State. 19. That within sixty (601 c=ys of the issuance of a State Traffic Commission Certificate. a copy thereof together with L.is report �. be recorded on the mun`=ipal land records in accordance with the attached procedurz. 20. That all signs and pa,.=-?nt markings conform to the standards contained in the later: edition of the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for S_r__ets and Highways". 21. That the State Trzf;:: ::,,mission reserves the right to require additional improvemerts or changes, as deemed necessary by the developments traffic :r the future. The cost of any additional r improvements or chanc:s shall be borne by the owner of the development. The above conditions were --=viewed with Sgt. Thomas Hart on November 17, 1989 anc on behalf of Chief Gary T_-'=-, Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of Sout;- W" :^dsor, he concurred with a-.' :'.,ems except No. 7. The Town feels Gerber Sci er.t==i c should equitably parti c":=_=e in condition No. 7 and not be fully resp--ns�51e. Mr. Steve Mitchell , the =•elopers authorized representative, was info-ne: of the above recommendati:-_ on November 17, 1989 and concurred with a: : items except Nos. 7, 12, :: =nd 21. REPORT OF FINDINGS GERBER SCIENTIFIC ROUTE 194 TOWN OF SOUTH WERDSOR -RITE DESCRIPTION: Gerber Scientific has proposed a 302,300 square foot :xpansion of their existing 97,700 square foot facility on Route 194, Sullivan Avenue, in the Town of South Windsor (see attached site location map) . The expanded 400 ,000 square foot facility will house Light manu:EacLuring, research & development, warehousing and office space. Access to the site will be via one drive, opposite Kennedy Road onto Route 19.4. The expansion of Gerber Scientific has Town of South '4indsor Planning and Zoning approval. --SITE GENFF_?:=D TRAFFIC: The site is expected to generate 2746 vehicle trips on am average day. The anticipated peak hour generated traffic will be 37Z. vehicles (306 enter, 67 exit) in the am and 350 vehicles _(74 enter, 276 exit) in the pm. The expected directional distribution of site =_.=ic onto Route 194 is 16% to the west and 82% to the east. The genes,—=7 volumes and directional distribution has been reviewed and appr--:e. by the Bureau of Planning. SITE ENS► _-DNS AND IMPACT ANALYSIS Route 194 :S.Mivan Avenue) : Route 194 is a arterial / collector roadway that begins at it' s intersection with U.S. Route 5 and terminates at it' s intersection with Routes 30, 74 and Buckland Road (Wapping rive Corners) . The 1988 ADT for Route 194 is 16, 200 veh/day in the vicinity of Routes 30 & 74 , 13, 500 veh/day in the area of the proposed site drive and 15, 900 veh/day as it nears U.S. Route 5. posted speed limit on Route 194 varies from 40 to 45 mph. Route 194 has signalized intersections with Routes K , 74 and Buckland Road, Sand Hill Road, Pierce Road, �;�_:ivan Avenue Shopping Center and U.S. Route 5. The s=te generated traffic is not expected to exacerbate existing traffic conditions on the thru sections of Roue 194 . However, the 'ttaff4c w=11 have an impact on operations at several of the above mentioned signalized intersections (see below) . Route 1.4 Route 30 / Route 74 / Buckland Road Intersecticn: This is a signalized five leg intersection that is currently over capacity during both the am and pm peak hours. The expansion of Gerber Scientific will add an additional 188 vehicles in the am peak and 176 vehicles in pm peak to this intersection. The increase in traffic wiii have an adverse impact on traffic operations at this location. Due to the difficult geome-wry of this location, :_ is not practicable for this developer to under take the improvements that Would be required to offset the impact -- of site g nerat d traffic. Th refor it is recommended that the developer equitably participate in funding for future improvements, to this location, to the extent necessary to adequately handle traffic generated by the expansion of the Gerber Scientific facility. Route 194 / Sand Hill Road Intersection: This is a T type intersection and is controlled by a semi actuated traffic signal. All three legs of this intersection have two lane approaches The Route 194 legs have one thru lane and an exclusive -- turn lane. The site generated traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on this intersection. _Route 194 / Pierce Road Intersection: This intersection is T type with a semi actuated traffic control signal. The signal is interconnected with the signal at the Route 194 - Sand Hill Road intersect=on. Northbound Route 194 has a 12 foot wide exclusive left turn lane and a 12 foot wide thru lane. Southbound Route 194 and Pierce Road have 12 foot wide one lane approaches. Analysis using projected 1991 external traffic conditions indicate that this intersection will be over capacity during peak traffic hours. The development will add 299 vehicles in the am peak and 279 vehicles in the pm peak hour. '.c address this 12% - 15% increase in traffic it is recommended that a right turn lane forsouthbound Route 194 anz' a two lane approach for Pierce Road be constructed. These improvements will e=f ectively offset the development' s impact at this loon-ion. It is understood :.hat the developer of Gert-er Scientific is responsible for .he aforementioned widen=mg of Pierce Road. However, pric= to completion of the fu].I-build Gerber Scientific complex, if there are othe- developers in the area, subject to State Traffic Commission review, which would impact, ;.he relevant traffic lca=s of the subject intersecticm, those development' s will be reviewed by the State Traf-fic Commission and may be required to equitably partici:=-�e in the Pierce Road widening. Route 194 / Sullivan Avenue 9�cpping Center Intersectic i;"lis four leg intersection nas recently been reconst acted by the Town of South Wir_fsor. Route 194 has an exclusive left turn lane and a / right lane in each firection. The side roads have been realigned to provide a wore conventional four =eg intersection. Analysis indicates that the site generated traffic will not have a substantial impac_ on traffic operations a7 this location. .oute 194 / Site Driv / Kenn dy Road Intersection: Curr ntly this is a four leg intersection that has stop control on the side ._ streets. With the addition of the sit g nerated traffic the peak hour warrant for signalization will be met. However, this is the only warrant that is met and the disruption of traffic flow on Route 194 is not expected. r` Therefore, the installation of a traffic control signal is not recommended at this time. It is recommended that if the installation of a traffic control signal becomes necessary, the developer be responsible for the installation. In order to accommodate the increase in traffic the developer will widen Route 194 to provide for a northbound exclusive left turn lane at the site drive. The site drive will also be widened to provide a two lane approach to Route 194. route 194 / Rye Street Intersection: this is a T type stop controlled intersection. Review shows that the development will increase traffic at this location by approximately 2%. The generated traffic is thru traffic and is not expected to have a significant impact on traffic operations at this location. Route 194 / U. S. Route 5 Intersection: This is a four leg signalized in-wersection that currently orerates at an acceptable level of service during peak hours. The development's traffic will have an impact on the northbound U.S. Route 5 right turn movement. To offset this impact the developer has proposed the construction of a northbound right turn lane. However, due to difficulties with right-of-way it has been determined that this improvement can not be pursued at this time. It is recommended that the developer equitably participate in any future project to construct this improvement. r-. ACCIDENT EXF-T:.IENCE The latest three yeAr; accident experience for Route 194 in the vicinity of to development was reviewed and no accident pattern or trend was discovered. The U.S. Route 5 - Route 194 and Route 30 , 74 , 194 and Buck'-and Road intersections are No 345 and 557 on the 1985 - 1987 SLOSSS. These locations have been reviewed and the additional traffic generated by the development is not expected to exacerbate conditions. ,r- PROPOM PROJECTS Y THE DE ARTHM OF TRA ATIQN "-roject 132-100: This planned project will provide for major wid Line ening of Buckland Road from dth�i�ngester date is 03/91. Route 30. Tentative roject 132-102: This project proposes the relocation of 14400 feet 1200 of Route 74 to intersect 30with tativeoute l94 approx.advertising date feet north of Route "y is 01/91. )E R'S RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS --The developer Ihas recommended the improve R improvements outlinedinconditions 1o. 1 - S and 12 as listed in State Traffic Commission po 132-8812-01. OFFICE OF TRAF_=C ENGINEERING RECOMMENQ IMPROVEMENTS The office of r=aff is Engineering agrees with the improvements proposed by the developer and also reco Qends items No. 7 - 11 anc -13 - 9 as lis,_ed in State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-88:2-01 . r The Off ice o- 77raf f is Engineering and t a Town of South Winds- a Windsor rare in agreement wi,- -,,he ne above conditions. However, the Town fee 15 developer not be fully responsible for but only equitab= participate =- -.he improvements to the Route 194 - Pierce Road h intersection. _ze developer s authorized representative agrees «_ J all conditions of State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-8812-01 except No. 7 . !2, 13, and 21. r �� G '`' `ram �' v`�' ,a•,// ~�' � /% ,• .' % r. � �p•A \`\ram � � \ % .`` / �.' \. • r RYE ST ap �. f /fir per PA GER er SC I ENTI rm' 'll r- 14 •�•�� i✓� I� ram-'Wig.. .�•._.r;,31 � ••.,...:r�� / K F i' � �• ' BRICK '� If 1 O ::,•. i . it I � i .�1 '-� • .. .,� __. - Ali:. ,.,, • -a w - PROCEDURE FOR FILING CERTIFICATES ON LAND RECORDS Within sixty (60) days of the issuance of the Certificate, a copy thereof together with the Traffic Investigation Report is to be recorded, at no cost to the State of Connecticut, by the applicant on the land records of the municipality in which the pat, of land encompassed by the Certificate is located. If the subject premises are situated in more than one municipality, a duplicate original of the Certificate and the Traffic Investigation Report must be recorded r- by the applicant, at no cosT to the State of Connecti- cut, on the land records of Each municipality. The municipal clerk shall list. the "State of Connecticut" as the grantee of the Certificate in the municipal land record indices. certified copy of the Certficate and Traffic Inves- Migation Report evidencing date of recordation must be delivered to the Office c= the State Traffic Commis- sion within the above speci!:_d sixty-day period. -- Failure to comply with the a=:ve will result in the revo- cation of the Certificate. Aug:.,s 1989 r-- r-' TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT GERBER SCIENTIFIC, INC. SULLIVAN AVENUE OFFICES TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT November 29, 1988 r- &1111111l111I/// GOCk N/yF�,% #13321 f •• p • �cENS� l -' ---- //111111111 Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester, Connecticut 06040 85-350 r C" - O FUSSMYNEILU consulting engineers November 29, 1988 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State of Connecticut Traffic Commission P.O. Drawer A 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, CT 06109 - Re: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Sullivan Avenue Offices South Windsor, Connecticut Dear Mr. Stoeckert: For your review we are submitting eight (8) copies of the Certificate Application for the expansion of the Gerber Scientific, Inc. offices on Sullivan Avenue in the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut. The following items have been included for your use in conducting this review: ; 1. Application for Certificate 2. Traffic Impact Study - November 22, 1988 3. Schematic Master Plan - Gerber Scientific, Inc. , rev. 10/18/88 4. Roadway Plan - Sullivan Avenue and Site Driveway, 11/88 5. Roadway Improvement Plan - Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue, 11/88 If you require any additional information, please contact us at any time-0 ver tr ly y urs, St hen F. Mitchell, P.E. Susan T. Smichenko As ociate Transportation Engineer r Director of Traffic Engineering SFM:STS:scm cc: John Decker Marcia Banach Gary K. Tyler 85-350 1007ATRF.7 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 0 SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES•SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC•PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY 4& STATE OF CONNECTICUT "�`�•txs sue` TRAFFIC COMMISSION COMM"~ Department of Transportation ''""'*(Maw``''"y" 24 Wolcott Hill Road a P.O. Drawer A WcthersGcld. ConAectitut 06109 Date November 29, 1988 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE In accordance With Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised, and State Traffic Commission regulati ns, a Certificate is hereby requested for: Name of Facility: ' Gerber Scientific, Inc. ,- Location: Sullivan venue Town and Zip Number: South W1 n sor,, Square Feet. of. Gross Floor Area: 400,000 (97,700 existing) Number of- Parking Spaces: Start of Construction (Date) Fal 1 _ 1989 Opening Date: _ Fall 1991 r - Owner's Name: Gerber Scientific, Inc. ,-- Owner's Address: AR nprhar Rnari West Town, State & Zip Number cn1 it h Wi nd cnr CT nF n74 Authorized Representative, to be contacted during review of application. Name: S . ohen F. Mitchell , P E ,Fuss & O'Neill , Inc Address: 146 Hartford Road Town, State & Zip Number: chester, CT 06040 Phone: 203 646-2469 Enclosed are eight (8) sets of the proposed development showing the information 'required. (see attached) SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS checklist to be included with application. Owner's Representati ve 1 ' N p MTG-1 T M�4JC�R TRAFFIC GENERATOR SUBMISSION G'UIDEL INES A A completed check list should accompany the application form and other P materials submitted to the Commission. Items which are not submitted v P should be identified along.with an explanation why they are not applicable. F L F I At the time of application eight sets of the information deemed C appropriate to the development should be submitted to the Commission, with S S A an additional set of the information being forwarded by the developer to I I • B the involved manicipality(s) Legal Traffic Authority(s). T T L E E E Review of a proposed development may not begin until all of the applicable information is received. 1:1 ® El I. 1" - 40' Scale Roadway Plan (nominally 2' X T ) showing development frontage plus 500' in each direction and all roadways w'nere improvements are proposed showing: (Note: Plans showing improvements should indicate sufficient distance of approach roadway in order that the proposed improvement can be evaluated in regard to the overall roadway. Fx] ❑ ❑ A. Property lines on both sides of roadway. Pe Y Y MM El B. Right-of-way lines - existing and proposed. R RX D C. Curb lines - existing proposed. and ro sed. R R RX D. Sidewalks - existing proposed. and ro sed. RX D ❑ E. Driveways. El ® ❑ F. Intersects roads (with street lines) . © � x El G. Significant trees and shrubs. L❑❑ ❑ H. Drainage Structures - e;dsting and proposed (catch basins, culverts, r1 etc. ) U a ❑ I. Utilities - poles nurber, water gates fire hydrants, etc. F-X] Po by � o �a ❑ J. Typical and critical sections of roadway irP rovements (include surface -' cross slopes, treatment to existing ground, and metal beam railing location where required). ❑ F-1 [11 K. Slope limits for improvements. FIX M ❑ L. Intersectional si ' t lines in accordance with Department of gn Transportation criteria for existing drives, proposed drives, any intersection that has proposed is as a result of the development, and any existing drives and/or roadways where traffic is being shifted closer to the existing curb line. A profile of the final ground surface along the sight line may be needed for verification. ' Lx1 F-1 El M. Signs - existing (and proposed if no signs and markings plan). o ''g P °P° 8T� � — CO LKM-2- ❑ FX-1 ❑ N. Guide rail and ferring - existing and proposed. -- U Ej ❑ 0. Pavement markn.ngs - existing (and proposed if a signs and markings plan is not submitted). L�LJ ❑ ❑ P. Illumination appurtenances ❑ El 1:1 II. 1" = 40' ibrizon:al, 1" = 4' Vertical Scale Profile of all Drives which are in excess o percent within of the edge of roadway a or have approach grades in excess of 8-percent at any point. El1:1 FX.1 1" = 40' Scale Pavement Marking and Signi2a Plan (Nominally 2' X 3' ) of the vropos roa way i existing roadway alterations are sign icant s ,ng. - Fx-� ❑ ❑ A. Edge of Road - proposed. I� FXU ❑ ❑ - B. R.O.W. Lines proposed. X❑ ❑ ❑ C. Drives - proposed. rrD0 LJ . Intersecting roads (with R.O.W. lines) U U 51 E Signal movement diagram and interconnection proposal if not adequately described in the submitted capacity analysis. (Detailed layout and design is not required at time of application unless tmusual conditions exist). Fx] ❑ ❑ �X� F. Utility poles by number. LJ ❑ f G. Drainage structures 1X ❑ 1:1 H. Fire Hydrants DF-1 El I. Traffic signs - proposed (dimensioned) U—XI F I ❑ J. Pavement mar proposed- (dimensioned) Fx1 H IV. Site Plan sho;ai FX ❑ A. Contours - existing and finished F11 ❑ B. Existing and proposed drainage for roadways and site D ❑ C. Par-King spaces - number provided, number required by town, (show layout and indicate any designated for handicapped, internal signing, pavement markings, etc. ). � X ❑ D. Driveways and existing roads. EDEl V. Site Location Plan s:lowing State highways and major intersecting Town roads in the vicinity of the site. a � - MIG-3- U ❑ VI. Traffic Information ❑ FA. Site generated traffic should reflect a successful day for the development. Values ress than those suggested by the ITE Trip Generation Report (current edition) should be substantiated. ❑ El 1. Morning peak hour of the roadway providing access to the site. M ❑ 2. Afternoon peak hour of the roadway providing access to the site. D1-1 3. Nbrning and afternoon peak hour of the generator if different than the morning and afternoon peak hour of the adjacent highway. ❑ �❑ 4. Other peak hours of the generator (weekday, midday, evening, weekend). aEl 5. Identify the hours of day, day of week and the reason the hours and days used in Items VI-A.1 through 4 were chosen. x �J 6. Percent distribution of generated traffic, by direction, for each major road leading to the area and at the access points, -for the n same peak hours as in Items VI A.1 through 4. � ^1 F-1 7. Flow diagrams for Items VIA-1 through 4 and Vi-A.6. NOTE: For shopping centers, projected traffic volumes as described in Items N V�-A.1 tnru 7 should have two submittals - one for Fridays and the other for 0 Saturdays - and should reflect a successful Friday and Saturday shopping day T outside the Thanksgiving and Christmas shopping days; the gross floor area S should be broken down by major tenants, and the mall area should be provided -- U A (if applicable). If a restaurant is proposed, provide size and location and B p indicate whether it is a fast-food or sit-down restaurant. If a bank is M P proposed, provide size and location and indicate absence or presence of a I L drive-in facility. T I T C For apartments, condominiums, hotels and motels, the number of 1, 2 and E A 3 bedroom units, and the square foot area of each type of unit should be D B noted. L E For other types of major traffic generators, contact the Bureau of Planning - Office of Transportation Forecasting and Inventory (566-5719) for t!* appropriate traffic volume data to be submitted. U ❑ B. Existing Traffic FX] ❑ 1. Flow diagrams s► existing traffic for the same peak hours as in � � VI-A.1 through 4, above. -- Fx_1 ED C. Background Traffic (should be seasonally adjusted to reflect the backgroundtraffic for the month that carries the heaviest ADrT on the subject roadway when the development will be occupied - should not reflect an average annual daily traffic). Inquiries regarding seasonal adjustments factors may be directed to the Planning Inventory and Data Section (666-2309). MIG-4- _ ❑ ❑ 1. Background traffic for the same peak hours as in VI A.1 through 4 above, in the year the development is scheduled to be fully occupied. lb.J ❑ 2. Identify the other developments whose traffic is included in back ground traffic. ® ❑ 3. Identify the seasonal and annual growth factors applied to existing traffic and justify their selection.- ❑ 4. Flow diagrams for VI-C.1 above. L D. Combined Traffic (Background plus site generated) U ❑ 1. Combined traffic for the same peak hours as in VI-A.1 through 4, above. El ❑ 2. Flow diagrams for VI-D.1 above. ❑ ❑ E. Capacity Analysis, including all input data, supportive computation sheets and/or charts. When analysis indicates improvements are necessary, recarmended improvement plans in accordance with Items I, IT and III should be submitted. Analysis should be provided for intersections, interchanges, or expressways that'are significantly affected by the generated traffic for the following time periods and traffic conditions: X El 1. Backg�ound Traffic ® ❑ a. Morning peak hour of the adjacent highway. ❑ El b. Afternoon peak hour of the adjacent highway. F-1 a c. Morning and afternoon peak hour of the generator, if different than the morning and afternoon peak hour of the adjacent highway. FX 1 ❑ 2. Combined Traffic r LJ a. Morning peak hour of the adjacent highway. FX] ❑ b. Afternoon peak hour of the adjacent highway. ❑ M c. Morn and afternoon peak hour of the , if different � Pe than the morning and afternoon peak hour of the adjacent highway. The format for the submitted analysis should be in accordance with c� Transportation Research Board Special Report 209 (1985 Highway Capacity — � Manual). Inquiries about the format of the analysis may be directed to the a°Q, Division of Traffic (566-5113). MIr-,-5- ❑ El F. Storage/Queue Analysis The submission of a Storage and/or Queue analysis supperting the background and combined traffic capacity analysis provided under Sections VIE-1 and VI E.2 is usually necessary under the following conditions: a D 1. When exclusive turn lanes exist or are proposed. � P Po FI fx-� 2. When there is a potential for vehicular backups between adjacent intersections and/or major drives. ` x 3. When limited stopping sight distance will exist on a signalized approach. ❑ ❑ 4. Off-rare approaches to signalized intersections. Other conditions may be identified by the engineer or the Division of Traffic in which a Storage/Queue analysis is necessary. RX ❑ G. Accident Anal sis Accident problem areas (if any) in the vicinity of the site or off site impacted locations, should be identified. ❑ ® VII Drainage Cations Drainage computations must be submitted wizich indicate that no flooding N or damage to the State highway facilities will be caused by a storm 0 having a 10-year frequency for surface run-off and a 50-year frequency S T for watercourses, except for those watercourses located within flood U plains, delineated on the flood insurance maps issued by the Federal B A Emergency Management Agency. For those flood plain watercourses, the M P design shall be for a 100-year period. Detention basins are to be I P designed for a 50-year frequency and analyzed for a 100-year frequency. T L T I Development sites that slope away from the State higi-gays and will not E C affect the State highway drainage system will require a verification of D A such in lieu of submitting drainage calculations for the site. B L Inquiries about data required for drainage items may be directed to the -' E District Office involved. X I D VIII Plarming and Zoning Approval roposed expansion A statement indicating whether the proposed facility and/or expansion ib m i t t e d to South required local Planning and Zoning approval should be supplied. I f such Windsor Planning approval has been granted, the date(s) which the approval(s) has been -Lnd Zoning. obtained should be indicated. If approval is required and has not been oproval expected - granted, a statement indicating the anticipated schedule for obtaining 1/89. Planning and Zoning approval should be supplied. IX Supplemental Data During the course of the certificate review process, certain matters may come to the attention of the reviewer that will necessitate additional data be submitted by the developer at a later date for still further review. Revised June. 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE A. INTRODUCTION 1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 C. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 3 D. DISTRIBUTION OF SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 3 -' E. ANALYSES 4 F. CONCLUSIONS 8 APPENDIX A - TABLES 1. TRIP GENERATION 2. TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3. LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY APPENDIX B - FIGURES 1. SITE LOCATION MAP 2. TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS 3. 1991 A.M. EXTERNAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4. 1991 P.M. EXTERNAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5. ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION 6. A.M. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7. P.M. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8. 1991 A.M. COMBINED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES f 9. 1991 P.M. COMBINED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 10. 1991 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 11. DAILY GENERATED TRAFFIC 12. 1991 COMBINED DAILY TRAFFIC 13. TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS APPENDIX C - A.M CAPACITY ANALYSES WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D - P.M. CAPACITY ANALYSES WORKSHEETS APPENDIX E - QUEUE ANALYSES A. INTRODUCTION Gerber Scientific, Inc. has proposed the expansion of their Sullivan Avenue office development in the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut. The development is located on a 49.42 acre parcel on the south side of Sullivan Avenue opposite Kennedy Road. Currently located on the site is a 97,700 S.F. building; the expansion will provide an additional 302,300 S.F. of industrial space including light manufacturing, research and development, offices and warehousing. For the purpose of this study, this development is classified as an industrial park. Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. has been retained to study the traffic impact of the proposed expansion on the surrounding roadway network, and to prepare this application for certification under Statute 14-311. This report has been prepared to document the findings of our study and is being presented as part of the application to the State Traffic Commission (STC) . This report is also being submitted to the Town of South Windsor as part of the application for site plan -- approval. A full listing of the items being submitted for review is included in the Table of Contents and cover letter accompanying this report. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site, as shown in Figure No. 1 of Appendix B, is located on Sullivan Avenue in South Windsor. Sullivan Avenue, also known as State Highway No. 194, is a heavily traveled through-route for traffic traveling through the Town of South Windsor. It intersects U.S. Route 5 to the northwest of the site and State Route 30 and State Route 74 at the Wapping Five Corners intersection located southeast of the site. -1- In order to determine the impact of the proposed development on adjacent street traffic, traffic count data from Fuss & O'Neill 's files for the intersections in the vicinity of the site was utilized. The turning movement counts were projected to the 1991 design year using a 1.0 percent growth factor to account for normal growth in the area. Traffic from the following other developments was also added to the background volumes: 1. Buckland Hills 2. Lakewood Condominiums 3. Heartland/Rickel 's Home Center 4. J.C. Penny 5. Town Shopping Center 6. Victorian Woods 7. Plum Ridge 8. Firehouse/Office 9. Colonial Corner 10. Terry Office Park — 11. Wapping Shopping Center 12. Buckland Hills Mixed Use Development These developments have been approved, and some are already under construction. However, since some were not occupied when the data was collected, the traffic counts do not reflect their traffic volumes. The addition of traffic s generated by these other developments produces the peak hour external traffic volumes, which represent design year traffic which does not have the site as its origin or destination. Figure Nos. 3 and 4 of Appendix B show the -- design year external peak hour traffic volumes. — The greatest traffic impact on the roadway network will occur during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, the periods when -2- commut r trips are at their high st 1 v is. Traffic counts indicate that the A.M. peak hour is 7:00 to 8:00 A.M. and that the P.M. peak hour is 4:30 to 5:30 P.M. Therefore, these hours were subsequently analyzed. C. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC An estimate of the amount of traffic generated by the proposed development was made using the Institute of Transportation Engineers "Trip Generation" Manual, published in 1987. This manual, which is a compilation of trip generation data for similar facilities, presents the data as a series of rates and curves for peak hour and daily traffic. Using the size of the proposed development, calculations yield the number of vehicles which can be expected to enter and exit the site during the peak hours and on a daily basis. The driveway for the existing building was counted to determine the volume of traffic currently being generated by Gerber. This traffic was subtracted from the 1987 existing peak hour volumes in order to compute the traffic generated by the expansion and the existing building as one development. D. DISTRIBUTION OF SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC The regional arrival/departure distribution to and from the proposed development is shown in Figure No. 5. This distribution was derived from existing traffic patterns and a demographic estimate of the population centers which would be origin points for the generated traffic. -3- The site g n rat d traffic was assign d to the roadway system in accordance with the arrival/departure patterns to produce the site-generated traffic volumes shown in Figure Nos. 6 and 7. The site-generated traffic was then added to the 1991 external traffic volumes to produce the 1991 — combined traffic volumes, presented in Figure Nos. 8 and 9. Table No. 2 of Appendix A represents the existing traffic volumes, other development traffic, projected external traffic volumes, and combined traffic volumes. The traffic movement numbers used in this table can be found in the traffic movement plate, Figure No. 2. E. ANALYSES 1. Capacity Analyses In discussing intersection capacity analyses, two terms are used to discuss the operating condition of the road or intersection. The volume to capacity ratio (v/c) is a ratio of the volume of traffic using an intersection to the total capacity of the intersection (the maximum number of vehicles that can utilize the intersection during an hour) . The v/c ratio can be used to describe the percentage of capacity utilized by a single intersection movement, a combination of movements, an entire intersection approach, or the intersection as a whole. As the v/c ratio approaches 1, the intersection nears capacity and it may become impossible to accommodate all the vehicles attempting to travel through the intersection. Level of Service is a measure of the delay experienced by _. stopped vehicles at the intersection. Level of Service -4- Is rated on a scale from A to F, with A describing a condition of very low delay, and F describing a condition where average delays will exceed 60 seconds per vehicle. Delay is defined as a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. — Therefore, intersections with longer delay times are less acceptable to most drivers. Level of Service is generally used to describe the operation (based on delay time) of both signalized and unsignalized intersections, while v/c ratio is applied to signalized capacity — analyses only. The definitions for conducting signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses are taken _ from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report No. 209), published by the Transportation Research Board in 1985. Using the above referenced methodologies, capacity analyses were conducted at the following intersections. — a. Signalized Intersections 1. Wapping Five Corners 2. Sullivan Avenue and Sand Hill Road 3. Sullivan Avenue and Pierce Road 4. Sullivan Avenue and Shopping Center Drive 5. Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue b. Unsignalized Intersections 6. Route 30 and Pierce Road 7. Sullivan Avenue and Site Drive/Kennedy Road -5- Table No. 3 is a summary of levels of s rvice and v/c ratios calculated at the intersections analyzed in this study. A review of the results indicates that operating conditions of the intersections surrounding the site will not change significantly as a result of site-generated traffic. However, some intersections are operating at poor levels of service, namely: 1. Wapping Five Corners -' The Wapping Five Corners intersection is currently over capacity during the A.M. peak hour and the P.M. peak hour. The continued growth in the area has increased the overburden on this intersection. There is no realistic possibility of capacity improvements, due to right-of-way constraints and the location of historically significant properties. With the increase in traffic due to the Gerber Scientific development, this condition will continue. However the additional delay will be minimal. 2. Sullivan Avenue and Pierce Road This intersection was recently reconstructed to provide an exclusive northbound left turn lane and signalization. Under 1991 P.M. External Peak Hour Conditions, analyses show that it will be operating with a v/c ratio over 1.00. The intersection will continue operating over capacity with the introduction of site-generated traffic. -6- It is not apparent how this intersection could be improved beyond its existing configuration without reconstructing a significant portion of Sullivan Avenue. The cost of this improvement is prohibitive in relation to the scope of this -- project and there is insufficient right of way to accommodate this widening. Therefore, no improvements are recommended. 3. Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue This intersection will operate at Level of Service E with v/c ratios greater than 1.0 during the P.M. peak hour under 1991 External and Combined Peak Hour Conditions. It is recommended that a northbound storage lane be provided for right turns onto Sullivan Avenue to improve operating conditions. This improvement will cause the intersection to operate at Level of Service C (v/c =0.84) during the A.M. peak hour and Level of Service D (v/c =0.96) during the P.M. peak hour. 6. Sullivan Avenue and Site Drive/Kennedy Road This intersection is operating at Level of Service D during the 1991 A.M. and P.M. External Peak Hour Conditions. With the introduction of site generated traffic, it will continue to operate at Level of Service D during the A.M. peak hour. During the P.M. peak hour, the intersection drops to Level of Service F with long delays experienced by vehicles turning left onto Sullivan Avenue. Signalization does not appear to be warranted at -7- this time; however, it is suggested that future volumes be monitored to determine the need for signalization in the future. 2. Accident History Inquiries were made to the Connecticut Department of Transportation regarding accident history in the vicinity of the site. Accident data was gathered for the past three years, and an examination of this data indicated that no significant accident patterns were demonstrated during the previous three year period. Therefore, the addition of site generated traffic at this location should cause no appreciable change in accident frequencies. 3. Sight Line Analysis The site driveway has been constructed with State of -- Connecticut guidelines so that adequate sight distance can be maintained. The available sight distance is over 1000 feet in both directions. F. CONCLUSIONS Based on the foregoing analyses, it is the professional opinion of Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. that the proposed expansion will result in minimal change to the existing roadway system. The proposed improvement will relieve some of the congestion in the area, however, other meaningful solutions are not available. It is not anticipated that any significant disruption will occur to the existing continuity of traffic flow as a result of this development. 1: APPENDIX A TABLE NO. 1 Hourly Trip Generation Volumes South Windsor, Connecticut (ITE Land Use Code 130) * A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR Enter 306 74 Exit 67 276 Total 373 350 *Calculated using methodology described in "Trip Generation" published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in 1987. Average weekday vehicle trip ends = 2746 TABLE NO. 2 BERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT DESIGN YEAR = 1991 STUDY YEAR = 1987 GROWTH RATE = 1.00 GROWTH FACT = 1.0406 t--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt t tt A.M. PEAK HOUR tt — t tt tt t tt t tt tt t tt t ENTER = 306 tt tt t tt t EXIT = 67 tt tt ttt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt t tt 1987 t OTHER t 1991 t SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC tt 1991 tt t TRAFFIC tt EXISTING t DEVELOP- t EXTERNAL t--------------+------------t--------tt COMBINED tt t MOVEMENT tt TRAFFIC t RENT t TRAFFIC t ENTERING + EXITING t TOTAL tt TRAFFIC tt t tt t TRAFFIC t t S VOL + Z VOL t VOL tt tt t ----------tt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt t 1 tt 81 t 9 t 93 t 15 46 + 0 0 t 46 tt 139 }+ t 2 tt 245 t 132 t 387 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 387 tt t 3 tt 326 t 141 t 480 t 15 46 + 0 0 t 46 tt 526 tt t 4 tt 743 t 122 t 895 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 895 tt t 5 tt 17 t 0 t 18 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 18 tt t 6 tt 760 t 122 t 913 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 913 tt t 7 tt 25 t 0 } 26 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 26 tt _ t 8 tf 275 t 22 } 30B t 0 0 + 15 10 t 10 tf 318 tt t 9 tt 300 t 22 t 334 t 0 0 + 15 10 t 10 tt 344 tt t 10 tt 12 t 41 t 53 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 53 tt t 11 tt 271 t 79 t 361 t 25 77 + 0 0 t 77 tt 438 +} t 12 tt 57 t 22 t 81 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 81 }} t 13 tt 8 t 4 t 12 t 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 tt 12 tt t 14 tt 348 t 146 t 508 t 25 77 + 0 0 t 77 tt 585 tt t 15 tt 25 t 2 t 28 t 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 tt 28 tt t 16 tt 415 f 117 t 549 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 549 tt t 17 tt 267 t 3 t 281 t 25 77 + 0 0 t 77 tt 357 tt t 18 tt 8 t 0 } 8 t 0' 0 + 0 0 } 0 tt 8 tt t 19 tt 715 t 122 t 866 t 25 77 + 0 0 t 77 tt 943 tt t 20 tt 6 t 2t 8t 0 0 + 0 Ot Ott 8tt t 21 tt 270 t 35 t 316 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 316 tt t 22 tt 235 t 60 t 305 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 305 tt t 23 tt 0 t Ot Ot 0 0 + 0 Ot Ott Ott t 24 tt 511 t 97 t 629 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 629 tt f 25 tt 2 t Ot 2t 0 0 + 0 0t Ott 2tt 26 tt 103 t 4 t 111 t 0 0 + 25 17 t 17 tt 128 tt t 27 tt 358 t 102 t 475 t 0 0 + 25 17 t 17-0t 491 tt t 28 tt 0 t Ot Ot 0 0 + 0 Ot Dot Ott 29 tt 463 t 106 t 588 t 0 0 + 50 34 t 34 at 621 tt t--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt F 6 0 PROJECT NO. 85 - 350 f-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------�f ff A.M. PEAK HOUR ff fff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff } ff 1987 } OTHER 1991 f SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC ** 1991 ff f TRAFFIC ff EXISTIN6 f DEVELOP- f EXTERNAL t--------------+------------f--------ff COMBINED ff f NOVEMENT ff TRAFFIC f MENT f TRAFFIC f ENTERIN6 + EXITIN6 f TOTAL } TRAFFIC ff f ff f TRAFFIC f S VOL + % VOL f VOL ff ff ----------ff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f 30 14 f 2 f 17 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 17 ff } 31 }} 47 f 31 f 80 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff BO ff f 32 ff 115 f 66 f 186 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 186 �} f 33 ff 39 f 46 f 87 f 0 0 + 0 O f 0 ff 87 ff f 34 ff 215 f 145 f 369 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 369 ff f 35 ff 471 f 41 f 532 f 50 153 + 0 0 f 153 ff 685 ff f 36 ff 64 f 3 f 70 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 70 ff f 37 ff 535 f 45 f 602 f 50 153 + 0 0 f 153 ff 755 ff f 38 ff 130 f 13 f 148 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 14B ff f 39 ff 296 f 10 f 318 f 15 46 + 0 0 f 46 ff 364 ff f 40 ff 426 f 23 f 466 f 15 46 + 0 0 f 46 ff 512 ff f 41 ff 98 f 4 f 106 f 0 0 + 15 10 f 10 ff 116 ff f 42 ff 421 f 96 f 534 f 0 0 + 50 34 f 34 ff 568 ff _ f 43 ff 519 f 100 f 640 f 0 0 + 65 44 f 44 ff 684 ff f 44 ff 218 f 3 f 230 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 230 ff f 45 ff 549 f 50 f 621 f 65 199 + 0 0 f 199 ff 820 ff f 46 ff 767 f 53 f 851 f 65 199 + 0 0 f 199 ff 1050 ff f 47 ff 451 f 100 f 569 f 0 0 + 65 44 f 44 ff 613 ff f 4B ff 210 f 0 f 219 f 0 0 + 15 10 f 10 ff 229 ff f 49 ff 661 f 100 f 788 f 0 0 + 60 54 f 54 ff 841 ff f 50 ff 51 f 9 f 62 f 15 46 + 0 0 f 46 ff 108 ff f 51 ff 68 f 0 f 71 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 71 ff f 52 ff 119 f 9 f 133 f 15 46 + 0 0 f 46 ff 179 ff f 53 ff 3 f 0f 3f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 3ff f 54 ff 4 f 0f 4f 0 0 + 0 0f Off Off f 55 ff 11 f 0 f 11 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 11 ff f 56 ff 18 f 0 f 19 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 19 ff f 57 ff 14 f 0 f 15 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 15 ff f 58 ff 504 f 43 f 567 f 82 251 + 0 0 f 251 ff 818 ff f 59 ff 0 f Of Of 0 0 + 0 Of Off Off _ f 60 ff 518 f 43 f 582 f 82 251 + 0 0 f 251 ff 833 ff f 61 ff 73 f 0 f 76 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 76 ff } 62 ff 4 f Of 4f 0 0 + 0 Of Off Off 63 ff 97 f 0 f 101 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 101 ff f 64 ff 174 f 0 f 181 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 181 ff T k. f------------------------------------------------------------------------------- F 6 0 PROJECT W. 05 - 350 f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f ff A.M. PEAK HOUR +} fff --------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------ff ff 1987 f OTHER 1991 } SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC of 1991 f TRAFFIC EXISTING f DEVELOP- f EXTERNAL f--------------+------------t------- COMBINED t+ 4-MYEMENT ft TRAFFIC f RENT } TRAFFIC } ENTERING + EXITING f TOTAL tf TRAFFIC ft f ff f TRAFFIC f f S VOL + S VOL f VOL ff ff f ----------ff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f 65 ff 56 f 0 f 5B f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 58 ff _ f 66 ff 321 f 78 f 412 f 0 0 + 82 55 f 55 ff 467 {f f 67 ff 10 f 0 f 10 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 10 ff f 68 ff 387 f 78 f 481 f 0 0 + 82 55 f 55 ff 536 ff f 69 ff 0 f 0 f 0 f 0 0 + 18 12 f 12 ff 12 ff f 70 ff 0 f 0f 0f 0 0 + 0 Of Off Off f 71 ff 0 f 0 f 0 f 0 0 + 82 55 f 55 ff 55 ff f 72 ff 0 f 0 f 0 f 0 0 + 100 67 f 67 ff 67 ff f 73 ff 0 f 0 f 0 f 82 251 + 0 0 f 251 ff 251 ff f 74 ff 602 f 33 f 659 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 659 ff f 75 ff 6 f 0f 6f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 6ff f 76 ff 608 f 33 f 666 f 82 251 + 0 0 f 251 ff 917 ff f 77 ff 3 f 0f 3f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 3ff f 78 ff 0 f Of 0f 0 0 + 0 Of 0ff Off f 79 ff 9 f Of 9f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 9ff f 80 ff 12 f 0f 12f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 12ff f 81 ff 8 f Of 8f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 8ff f 82 ff 250 f 57 f 317 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 317 ff f 83 ff 0 f 0 f 0 f 1B 55 + 0 0 f 55 ff 55 ff f 84 ff 258 f 57 f 325 f 18 55 + 0 0 f 55 ff 381 ff f 85 ff 7 f Of 7f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 7ff f 86 ff 372 f 0 f 387 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 387 ff f B7 ff 126 f 0 f 131 f 5 15 + 0 0 f 15 ff 146 ff f Be ff 505 f 0 f 526 f 5 15 + 0 0 f 15 ff 541 ff f 89 ff 372 f 0 f 387 f 0 0 + 5 3 f 3 ff 390 ff f 90 ff 47 f 0 f 49 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 49 ff f 91 ff 415 f 28 f 460 f 0 0 + 10 7 f 7 ff 467 ff f 92 ff 834 f 28 f 896 f 0 0 + 15 10 f 10 ff 906 ff _ f 93 ff 190 f 49 f 255 f 10 31 + 0 0 f 31 ff 286 ff f 94 ff 982 f 0 f 1022 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 1022 ff f 95 ff 66 f 0 f 69 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff b4 ff f 96 ff 1246 f 49 f 1346 f 10 31 + 0 0 f 31 ff 1376 ff f 97 ff 6 f 0f 6f 0 0 + 0 0f 0ff 6ff f 98 ff 17 f 0 f 18 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 18 ff f 99 ff 1 f 0 f 1 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 1 ff t 100 ff 24 f 0 f 25 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0f 25 ff f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff a F & 0 PROJECT N. 85 - 350 FW MAID: BERBER p GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT }--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff }+ P.M. PEAK HOUR �+ f } ENTER = 74 ff } } ff } EXIT = 276 fff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------}+ ff 1987 f OTHER f 1991 f SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC ff 1991 }� _ } TRAFFIC }f EXISTING f DEVELOP- f EXTERNAL f--------------+------------}--------ft COMBINED �f f MOVEMENT ff TRAFFIC f MENT f TRAFFIC f ENTERING + EXITING f TOTAL ff TRAFFIC ff f ff f TRAFFIC f f S VOL + S VOL f VOL ff ff f ----------ff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f 1 ff 185 f 14 f 207 f 15 11 + 0 0 f 11 ff 218 ff f 2 ff 860 f 203 f 1098 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 1098 ff f 3 ff 1045 f 217 f 1304 f 15 11 + 0 0 f 11 ff 1316 ff f 4 ff 304 f 218 f 534 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 534 ff f 5 ff 33 f 0 f 34 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 34 ff f 6 ff 337 f 218 f 569 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 569 ff f 7 ff 19 f 0 f 20 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 20 ff f 8 ff 73 f 10 f 86 f 0 0 + 15 41 f 41 ff 127 ff f 9 ff 92 f 10 f 106 f 0 0 + 15 41 f 41 ff 147 ff f 10 ff 25 f 84 f 110 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 110 ff f 11 ff 404 f 172 f 592 f 25 19 + 0 0 f 19 ff 611 ff f 12 ff 267 f 60 f 338 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 338 ff f 13 ff 53 f 8 f 63 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 63 ff _ f 14 ff 749 f 324 f 1103 f 25 19 + 0 0 f 19 ff 1122 ff f 15 ff 18 f 9 f 28 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 28 ff f 16 ff 205 f 144 f 357 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 357 ff f 17 ff 202 f !0 f 220 f 25 19 + 0 0 f 19 ff 239 ff f 18 ff 25 f 2 f 28 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 28 ff f 19 ff 450 f 165 f 633 f 25 19 + 0 0 f 19 ff 652 ff f 20 ff 42 f 0 f 44 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 44 ff f 21 ff 88 f 48 f 140 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 140 ff f 22 ff 57 f 64 f 123 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 123 ff f 23 ff 3 f Of 3f 0 0 + 0 Of Off 3ff _ f 24 ff 190 f 112f 310f 0 0 + 0 0f 0ff 310ff 25 ff 2 f 0f 2f 0 0 + 0 0f p 2ff # 26 ff 223 f 0 f 232 f 0 0 + 25 69 f , ff 301 ff f 27 ff 385 f 153 f 554 f 0 0 + 25 69 f -69 623 ff f 28 ff 5f Of 5f 0 0 + 0 Of � Aff 5ff f 29 ff 615 f 153 f 793 f 0 0 + 50 138 f hM 931 ff f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F 6 0 PROJECT NO. 85 - 350 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f ff P.M. PEAK HOUR ff fff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f ff 1987 f OTHER f 1991 f SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC ff 1991 ff f TRAFFIC ff EXISTING f DEVELOP— f EXTERNAL f--------------+------------f--------ff COMBINED ff f MOVEMENT ff TRAFFIC f RENT f TRAFFIC f ENTERING + EXITING f TOTAL ff TRAFFIC }+ f }} f TRAFFIC f f S VOL + % VOL f VOL ff ff _ f ----------ff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------f+ f 30 ff 25 f 2 f 28 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 28 ff f 31 ff 265 f 98 f 374 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 374 #+ f 32 ff 497 f IGO f 697 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 697 ff f 33 ff 40 f 82 f 124 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 124 #� f 34 ff 827 f 362 f 1223 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 1223 ff f 35 ff 539 f 170 f 731 f 50 37 + 0 0 f 37 ff 768 ff _ f 36 ff 95 f 17 f 116 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 116 ff f 37 ff 634 f 187 f 847 f 50 37 + 0 0 } 37 ff 884 ff f 38 ff 56 f 9 f 67 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 67 ff f 39 ff 74 f 3 f 80 f 15 11 + 0 0 f 11 ff 91 ff f 40 ff 130 f 12 f 147 f 15 11 + 0 0 f 11 ff 158 ff f 41 ff 293 f 13 f 318 f 0 0 + 15 41 f 41 ff 359 ff f 42 ff 564 f 148 f 735 f 0 0 + 50 138 f 138 ff 873 ft f 43 ff 857 f 161 f 1053 f 0 0 + 65 179 f 179 ff 1232 ff f 44 ff 45 f 0 f 47 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 47 ff f 45 ff 568 f 173 f 764 f 65 48 + 0 0 f 48 ff 812 ff _ f 46 ff 613 f 173 f 811 f 65 48 + 0 0 f 48 ff 859 ff f 47 ff 683 f 161 f 872 f 0 0 + 65 179 f 179 ff 1051 ff f 48 ff 85 f 10 f 98 f 0 0 + 15 41 f 41 ff 140 ff f 49 ff 768 f 171 f 970 f 0 0 + 80 221 f 221 ff 1191 ff f 50 ff 175 f 14 f 196 f 15 11 + 0 0 f 11 ff 207 ff f 51 ff 174 f 0 f 181 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 181 ff f 52 ff 349 f 14 f 377 f 15 11 + 0 0 f 11 ff 388 ff f 53 ff 130 f 0 f 135 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 135 ff f 54 ff 17 f 0 f 18 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 18 ff f 55 ff 208 f 0 f 216 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 216 ff f 56 ff 355 f 0 f 369 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 369 ff f 57 ff 149 f 0 f 155 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 155 ff f 58 ff 406 f 136 f 558 f 82 61 + 0 0 f 61 ff 619 ff f 59 ff 2 f Of 2f 0 0 + 0 Of 0ff 2ff f 60 ff 557 f 136 f 716 f 82 61 + 0 0 f 61 ff 776 ff f 61 ff 32 f 0 f 33 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 33 ff f 62 ff 27 f 0 f 28 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff Z8 ff f 63 ff 36 f O f 37 f 0 0 + 0 O f p ff 37 ff f 64 ff 95 f 0 f 99 f 0 0 + 0 0 f 0 ff 99 ff f------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff A F 6 0 PROJE1iT We 85 — 350 t--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tf t tt P.M. PEAK HOUR tt ttt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt t tt 1987 t OTHER t 1991 t SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC tt 1991 tt t TRAFFIC tt EXISTING t DEVELOP- t EXTERNAL t--------------+------------t--------tt COMBINED tt - t MOVEMENT tt TRAFFIC t MENT t TRAFFIC t ENTERING + EXITING t TOTAL tt TRAFFIC tt t tt t TRAFFIC t t S VOL + S VOL t VOL tt tt t ----------tt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt t 65 tt 33 t 0 t 34 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 34 tt t 66 tt 597 t 135 t 756 t 0 0 + 82 226 t 226 tt 983 tt t 67 tt 150 t 0 t 156 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 156 tt t 68 tt 780 t 135 t 947 t 0 0 + 82 226 t 226 tt 1173 tt t 69 tt 0 t 0 t 0 t 0 0 + 18 50 t 50 tt 50 tt t 70 tt 0 t Ot Ot 0 0 + 0 Ot 0tt Ott 71 tt 0 t 0 t 0 t 0 0 + 82 226 t 226 tt 226 tt _ t 72 tt 0 t 0 t 0 t 0 0 + 100 276 t 276 tt 276 tt t 73 tt 0 t 0 t 0 t 82 61 + 0 0 t 61 tt 61 tt t 74 tt 414 t 103 t 534 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 534 tt t 75 tt 4 t Ot 4t 0 0 + 0 Ot Ott Ott t 76 tt 418 t 103 t 538 t 82 61 + 0 0 t 61 tt 599 tt t 77 tt 7 t 0 t 7 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 7 tt t 78 tt 0 t 0t 0t 0 0 + 0 Ot Ott Ott t 79 tt 12 t 0 t 12 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 12 tt t 80 tt 19 t 0 t 20 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 20 tt t 81 tt 1 t 0 t 1 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 1 tt t 82 tt 699 t 101 t 828 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 828 tt t 83 tt 0 t 0 t 0 t 1B 13 + 0 0 t 13 tt 13 tt t 84 tt 700 t 101 t 829 t 18 13 + 0 0 t 13 tt 843 tt t 85 tt 5 t Ot 5t 0 0 + 0 Ot Ott 5tt t 86 tt 804 t 0 t 837 } 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 837 tt t 87 tt 412 t 0 t 429 t 5 4 + 0 0 t 4 tt 432 tt t 88 tt 1221 t 0 t 1271 t 5 4 + 0 0 t 4 tt 1274 tt t 89 tt 140 t 0 t 146 t 0 0 + 5 14 t 14 tt 159 tt - t 90 tt 53 t 0 t 55 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 55 tt t 91 tt 321 t 92 t 426 t 0 0 + 10 2B t 28 tt 454 tt t 92 tt 514 t 92 t 627 t 0 0 + 15 41 t 41 tt 668 tt t 93 tt 46B t 90 t 577 t 10 7 + 0 0 t 7 tt 584 tt t 94 H 350 t 0 t 364 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 364 tt t 95 tt 16 t 0 t 17 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 17 tt t 96 tt 834 t 90 t 958 t 10 7 + 0 0 t 7 tt 965 tt t 97 tt 77 t 0 t 80 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 80 tt f 98 tt 64 t 0 t 67 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 67 tt t 99 tt 5 f Ot 5t 0 0 4 0 Ot Ott 5tt LL 0 100 tt 146 t 0 t 152 t 0 0 + 0 0 t 0 tt 152 tt 'A t-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt F 10 PROW IM. 05 - 350 -- FILE WIE: BERBER TABLE NO. 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection External Combined External Combined 1. Wapping Five Corners F/1.48 F/1.56 F/1.72 F/1.83 2. Sullivan Ave. & Sand Hill Rd. D/ .71 D/ .87 C/ .65 C/ .72 3. Sullivan Ave. & Pierce Rd. B/ .71 B/ .78 C/1.06 F/1.19 4. Sullivan Ave. & Shopping B/ .49 B/ .68 B/ .78 C/ .92 Center Dr. 5. Sullivan Ave. & Route 5 C/ .83 C/ .84 E/1.06 E/1.08 (including improvements) C/ .84 D/ .96 6. Route 30 & Pierce Rd. F F E E 7. Sullivan Ave. & Site Drive D D D F 1007ATRF.7 t I -- APPENDIX B I i i _ i` I I I r i i I i i rMErrOUSE� Sri p� ! eP.tT� � DR tppd iP o WA. > A-1c", z w 1 O v w f u yl2 M • �' fr ! R Rp(Yd/PD POW AY rrw SL "ry TER OD 56 7 k h� TH MEVERS SNISN SC OOL w = R > ROAD PARK L rA C O SS � d ! RO $AND Ni � rouIx/ RO y I*, t TOMR W SARA" hyir ! •y��'rr�V. COmm"TY �Er rr►R/O aY. RD. ccueflRt I- I.. TON an I �w �� • K OOT O A T~ l NILL POND RcAOw� 0 COvCIM 1 �� � Y• Ark LS Y �� OJ ILA RK N R■ _ FIGURE NO. I FUSS801YI ILL MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT SITE LOCATION G E R BER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSO R C ON N ECTI CUT rROJ•No. 85-35ODATE=OCT 1988 SCALE: N.T. JOSEPH MERRITT&CO p O Aj 9/ qJ �90 I► �89 '`92 i SV���v _ s, q /00y s8� ♦ ^o,^�^ N (o 2.1 99 CD� co ac ♦ 84y 8/� (oN �S9 a2y ! �. � 58 ROAD 83 co P 157 R 6p p►Y ER s 68 ss� ^r y ss� M r s,� hhV6 h h _ r h i A-11* rh rn SITE ? s tiA h � o� p w 1. O 39 4-40 Sp►N� H�1.. ROAD AZ ♦ Z'-.Is N 17 NN`I w 4-16 *--19 �1 fl I-► J--15 � 5 r6 so J� *1� f C -+ 4 30 _ 4 —N _ — w r 34-► 32—► O_ O r 33� ♦ O Z SOP 3� 2� FIGURE NO. 2 FUSS&O'NBLL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT -- vv TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT an in PROD.NO. 8 5-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE N T S JOSEPH MERRITT&CO Q w 31. Q Ad a1♦N oN 49 N f-38; ~e9s i SVLL� sJ' Vq OD / M � � � 09Rss5 �( 2 s AD O ° oo 4 i'/S� RS82 AYFRS R0 � 4e sew / co N% m � c SITE ro�� 0t AQ i p N1LL O 0 - Z 318 466 sp,N co00 14 8 ♦ RO AO� i A0 `!SpQO LA 0 O � y '►J°ham° w z e p --4 OD N L 2 81 f--866 ° NI,� j52 8 0 N t8 �913 rgg5 30 1 f 70�5 3T0-* 186cc * wa' N 0 r p0 93 S 87 o z FIGURE NO. 3 4 FUSS&O'NI ILL MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT v�. 1991 A.M. EXTERNAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT In In PROD.NO. 85-350 DATE:OCT. 1988 SCALE: N.T.S. JOSEPH MERRITT 3 CO OD O �'�e4- ti � Z426 _ N .5cr a /5 4� 62T SUIL Vq 8 y ��► �rt I'� � o /� 4 N �� "3 5� CD � 8 i � 04R538 ♦ Z.9 M M 2 a 8z8y o ! M �558ROAD . 0� o o -$Ii ��ss R��s AVERS t ems,. �S 4 V7 s t o /ss M (o C o � � n m 40— mN 7- SITE ] t m 96? 4.01 s /* t 0 _ w 80 147 SANp f QO cw� rr 67 Rp AD QC, �s to � O w �4 ♦ Z'- 28 G w 220 N �3 In r 568 �2� 1-�33 o O r5-54 28-# 374-0 cA w Q, 1223-► g97-► oN 40 O �K PO 20?Jt 124 ♦ 1;0 r FIGURE NO. 4 w o Jrio0 FUSS 0171YSLL. MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT 1991 P.M. EXTERNAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT N 'ROJ•No. 8 5-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE: N.T S JOSEPH MERRITT&CO 31. Q 10'/ 4 0 10% � /��� zz � 5% AYERS R OAD _ 5% 82 /00 /000 % 2% 80 — � D 6°o/0 m Z C �— SITE �^ � oho I 165% 1 5� -- /65% Sp►Np r111- �oP ' IRO ND 0/0 4p �v 50% 50% 25 % 010 30 1 0 25o� 25 % r �OQO l 25%ow i 0 o FIGURE NO. 5/0000 T v fmMANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT v� ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT in C4 _. 4nPROD NO 85-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE: N T S JOSEPH MERRITT 3 CO Q w - O Q O M VIx Q - � Vi � i VqAD ILI 55 i25l �25� SSZ cy hn �► 25i R25� AVERS ROAD 55 � h r m SITE t m 6 a t° 40 46 46 SAND �o 0 ♦ ROAD �► APvu w � 4 o �77 f-77 *j L*6 i— +� — 0 `► r ACC'' -� -1 P� A6 -4 Z FIGURE NO. 6 4 F1JSS84'N8LL MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT - vv A.M. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC in SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT PROD.NO. 85-350 DATE-OCT 1988 SCALE: N T S JOSEPH MERRITT 3 CO Al cr- qpj I► i—�4 �42 i SV<< c� 61 AY ER S ROAD `v 226y � _ r c t as r � D m 7- SITE] it 'n OD ? D OD � D HALL — PO w t�� ♦. t� SAN ROAD ♦ 4 Z 19 ♦, F 19 -� -► t0 09 vpr — �O ��'� ,► FIGURE NO. 7 FUSS&O'NEILL t1 MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT P.M. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT in in PROJ•NO. 85-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE: N T.S JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO Q � _ to+ � t 4 s> `2 i N N V Q �► cv i'390 ~906 SUL U) s �4�► V '1 � s N rco mi v 3 i ';,-2S/9 -9/6 ` 1� ♦ �0 co SS y ti° /e AYER$ ROAD h �► � S 833 53S y S8� r 4s� err a � r ct) N i D N rn rn 0`� c SITE m �o 0 0 OD o A PO = Z 364 5�2 gp,NO N11"L 4v `► A° v, 000 N / ♦ Y Z cl o`° N �4—�449 f-942 w N �16 r913 s1 ♦ 28 L►� r 00 4•895 30 870-0 f C 3 70-* 186� (A ODaD N O O e7--4 526� 3gT FIGURE NO. 8 FUSS&OFINBLL MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT �v 1991 A.M. COMBINED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT n _. PROD.NO. 85-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE: N T S JOSEPH MERRITT&CO O Q O (o I► �/g9 �g68 � SVC c� 80� � t \ 0 4 �1V4N � in 16/ 4 V-599 A.If) go M 2 M � N i3 oNN /* i'Ss R>>s AYERS ROAD _ r ev � 3 98 � r /y N _ r , M 0 m o`'-1 Z SITE �l *1OD OD tm .gad 0 IV 40 CA PO CID 91 f-158 c SANG N1`` �o li f 6T RO AO 0 Q`lv °D v�o v t� �* � o w �4♦40 z 28 It-239 357 f�5 2 �J 1♦6 r 28 N �g4 f-568 o r534 so 2e-f 'notf223-►-5T4� to C� 62 o ♦ O r O a .► p Z 6 �o9a FIGURE NO. 9 p �a OFUSS )TYIElLL MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT 1991 P.M. COMBINED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC n SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT on PROd.NO 85-350 DATE:OCT. 1988 SCALE: N T S JOSEPH MERRITT&CO Q 0 w Q G spy 26,170 c- V N 20,400 �o -' p,Y ER S ROAD z SITE m s pP� SANG N1LL Q� RO Ao� O BCD � O 55 0 N - fA 30 _ C 16,000 w 7o pP0 0 FIGURE NO. 10 v O�O�, �• MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT 1991 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC in SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT In PRa,.No. 85-350 DATE-OCT. 1988 SCALE: N.T S. JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO Qw Q 0 275 �,�Q► � Q — ss cr c� o N m a 0 ti _ 14 0 A' AY ER s ROAD cr O m c S ITE71 m s — QO SANp N11-L ROAD o �v 1 1370 QD Cp 30 685 O� FIGURE NO. II v Fes° .re FLOSS&OWEELL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT �v DAILY GENERATED TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT PRal.NO. 85-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE: N T S JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO 0 O O 2 26,445 �`���� 2 _ C2 r Q N 0 0- "� 20,540 AVERS RpAD Z C [SITE m s Po SAND NILL ROADS'` c�0o Q �v 18,125 n 0 3o C -- 16,685 70C Opp o FIGURE NO. 12 v f � FUSS8c0 MML.v MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT 1991 DAILY COMBINED TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT PRoi.No. 85-350 DATE-OCT 1988 SCALE: N.T.S. JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO ` Q w L � 0 �G-\ •i V 27 5 sS cr- L7 cb o N 0 N 14 0 AY ER S ROAD 0 rn z _ SITE j c m SANO r111..1- �O IRO AO .P O� o s��PO �v 1,570 OD so 685 O� Opp o —' FIGURE NO. II o 1:USS8c0'IVEILL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT �v DAILY GENERATED TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC — CZ SOUTH WIND CONN ECTICUT n PROJ•NO. 85-350 DATE OCT. 1988 SCALE: N T S JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO O a O 26,445 cr O SV<</�q N 0 m 20,540 AYERS ROAD z SITE r m — s OPT smo 0 RO A -+ Ap Co v a 0 so C 16,685 M o OPT o FIGURE NO. 12 v FUSS&O'NSILL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT — vv 1991 DAILY COMBINED TRAFFIC GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT '"'► PROJ.NO. 85-350 DATE-OCT. 1988 SCALE: N.T.S. JOSEPH MERRITT a CO r� APPENDIX PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY 9�30 88 8S-35a 9 9 AN. E X7&X-t4A'L- SHEET NO. SUBJECT: Fi'VC C-09.Ne-"- 5ovT'tl veti r��Sc 2- 4/C. / ,JC TR�F<�G 1 -13 � L.wwE �' X S A FLow D - .� L� VowwE ' A 00 SB /to✓r� i q4 A �ti. � /.0O 93 Ak 1100 a 30Air 1 113 Z 91 ► T` 1.00 !�9 T 1,00 Z 3 boo300 �n /.G0 20 318 80cJw."0 5T y !0 34- SATuRAnON FLOW ADJUSTMENT WOWHM F J.o w :1AM GRiOUPS . s • AD O O ® ® Ad®ac O O O O Naof Lane Heave Grade Pk& &a Am 1ehA Sat � Width Vkh Type 'w+ 'fit Rate Gmw f I f f ( f i f a �„ff+b Flow N Mkbk Table (vphs) 9-5 9-6 9a 9-8 9.9 9.10 9-11 9.12 f 1so�o .93 9a /.o /.o /.o /.o /.o - o l.o 1641 1 . 93 .9 b 1.0 1.o /.0 1.0 /o /•O ,vi to l�o .� loop_ �.o ,�8 1.0 1.010 ).o 1,0 1•0 4- Es k l Boa I 9L .°1$ 10 1.0 /.v /.o /.o ,9S 1.621r .r ieoc I .q:f ,°18 1.011.0 1.0 1-0 - 1.0 - - sw os to �g� .93 )#0 !.o l.o /to 1.0 E-S -79 .9 S .o 1.00 1.0 1.0 ).0 1.o 1.0 i 'T I .9- .9►S 1.o /, 0 o /.0, /,o j PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. • •ems B BY 8s'-3SD 7130 erQ g o — A. S*MMT NO. ;, f 3 SUBJECT: Fi v C CO2t4Ce.5- � ,c. f,•�eu T� �G�L - 1 R�ITI F,ows 1 / LAN E Fl cRm �3.UP APT SAT. ,- v/C Aw&4a LAN FLow FLOW T{ouP •--�-- 4 •. ' 3 t4 � .osl �� •2097 . — xf 1-4 _ 329.2 Z _ _ DELAY- 1 , 1 y Second armDeky 'Btb�1 jc L06 to O m m O O O O �'"� t� oaay Pam°" l..r+e i�ne L�06 Vne % Ce�n cycle Delay Fscw Group G MW Dd+�p d, d= MkMe � Rego RWo L (,ec/, C ► (,ec/v�l,) PF Dom► � (�/'�) n� x � ��) � Table 9-13 (sec/veh) Tam 94 ( ) _ /wo �► I- �• 341 11 Z. o,S'o /•o F >Ee ►. IZO •o4 z-79,7S 4 !ZO 44•4:!r Z,41 .so 57(i• 3-�•�I s ,48 I 40,31 mm� 4 G5 3�,43 /,oo For JA 30' .tt 46& ,04 !20 � ¢S �.04 /.o o ,S7 F .o0 IZO Z7643 it#7 i.do JZO 3l• Z 3 F pig � �0,7 3FS7b /,00 4 4.43 s•� r-, LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET MAPPING FIVE CORNERS AM EXTERNAL } --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff CYCLE LENGTH C f f f f 120.00 ff ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f f f f 31.70 ff ff NUMBER OF LANES N f f f f 1.00 ff HTOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f f f f 634.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(o) f f f f 634.00 ff HLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f f f 31.00 ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f f f 0.05 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f f 1.00 ff ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f f f 185.00 ff .� ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f f f f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff `— ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f f f 1800.00 ff �-- ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f f f 0.10 ff ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f f 21.59 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f f 0.76 ff ff p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f f 0.05 ff ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f f f f 10.11 ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f f f 0.95 ff ff INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f f f f 8.71 ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f f f 1.48 ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) f f f f 1.00 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f f 1.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 ra & PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. FLISSO" BY Oot•16j*v er1c kieers �j 4 -- f.t�es ►99 J A'M• Co MBir/�D SHEET NO. SUBJECT: Fi v E C,02 • -r 1 !- t s 1 LANE V } . 3.�' DT SAT FLAN/ cRmc - U�ovp /C - •- ,► A C F.owS I �StS Ro p �taM/ �e.oW R�Cf1D _ .... / - + 1 90 0�3 Ab 30 L 338 0 30 1. ;=- i. Slo ✓ - ` ' I i• - S /S 1 4. ✓ 128<o 4-4Z .SL3 .�•`�/LQ 22.. 1 Z — a 377`SZ � - •°� Z82 4�3 ¢ DEFY 1♦-Z 3o O .L3 L o S - Plat 7�ra1 sec+oed'kemtwa 'Zbtal 1c L06 o f kws O ® m O . O O tie � Um T/c Green aj& Dela�r Laed C.eouP p, usC.eoup Ratio Ratio Iree�th d, r�P ) �tF°` � u06 (.�/� Table move- X 6/'C C ( / ) Y ( / Table9-13 (sec/veh) Tabk 94 c x 9-i ( ) 7,6-57l2.A .s J�� 44q. 338 ZO 321 I 3o z 0•Z G /•o 0 3Z.37 �e J,zs .u�4 /Zo 371 430 /W.3 J /`o v 8• F �-* 1,5� .DSb !ZO 44.SL S7S•I S Atop / • 7 �� •.a► - !ZO Sw6 1.Sb3 .Z$G 1 ZD Z/0-4Z5 •ZI ¢ J.SS-1 .044 IZO 4¢4-)3 69 Sr,B. /.00 Gi21 F JZp - .00 /83, -' ,(a 34 -287, I ZD 433 I. 9ly /.eo V lZD 34.2q 4-i) Z3 .00 .SZ we s s .� r -4Z 4 6L LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET YAPPING FIVE CORNERS AM ►.�.,+...__ f------------------------------------------r--------------------------------------� #f INPUT VARIABLES # NORTHBOUND # SOUTHBOUND t EASTBOUND # WESTBOUND tf } --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff t {# CYCLE LENGTH C # # # 120.00 ## ff Er. 1.1 VE GREEN y } } 30.07 ## ## NUMBER OF LANES N # f ; # 1.00 }� ##TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) } } } } 634.00 #t ff MAINLINE FLOC( RATE v(s) t#LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) } f f } 31.010 ff ## PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) # # f t 0.05 #f #t OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f f 1.00 ff f# Rpp^CTkr. r!^k PA'rr vff" ## PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) # # f f 0.00 ## J` #f---------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt - ##--------------------------------------------------------------------------------## ## COMPUTATIONS # NORTHBOUND t SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND # WESTBOUND #t # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------#f ## SAT FLOW RATE, DPP S(op) f # # # 1800.00 ## #f FLOW RATIO, Orr Y(o) t t # f 0.10 tt ##p/o 6RN NOT BLOCKED g(u) # # # _ f 19.77 #f ## LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) # # t f 0.76 ## ## p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f # f 0.05 #f =' ## p/o 6RN BLOCKED g(q) f f # # 10.30 ## t# p/a TH IN SHARE LN P(T) # # f # 0.95 #t ## INITIAL p/o 6RN g(f) # t # # 8.65 ## ## TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f t } - # 1.48 #t ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(#) # # t } 1.00 ff }f LT FACTOR f(LT) # # t f 1.00 tt #}-------------------------------------------------------------------------------## F & C PPOJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 1-1- DATE CH PREPARED DAECKED DATE PROJECT NO. )SS8,(yr*jML 7 oorMAtin0 engineers ev �5 -350 SHEET NO. SUBJECT: �ouTE /9 y S.¢�vo,�,�iLL .era - A,l�►�, ` I i L. �NE ' :� X �AO?�LTED --- Vr•4MIt � F�.o� /moo S-oo fi � s3Z .9's � . . vq �o . 9s do �4- �o iz' �z �31g 140 oo t Z 5 i4►� o 4 D �— 335 i,o o t Sao �. o 2 _pws s -SATURATION FLOW AD WORKSHEET P� w TAM CMOUPS AD FACTORS p © p O O O O O O ® ® ® Lane 1dea1 Na of Lmw Hem" Grade Pkg. Bus Area R�let � Fbw AP'Ps Gmw Sat. Imes Width 1kh Turn Rate Flow I. f ( f f "( i f a Qq*jpQ N (rpbt) r 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9.9 9-10 9-11 9-12 isoo oo ,do /,00 /.00 ,00 /00 /• /76y goo /00 /-oo �- 3 �. /too 1A0o /vv 140-0 /cqcN /00 /cam /.oo /76Y S.8 :_,y / / /. /,00 /00 00 /oo /,00 /oo /vo /on /..On CPO .gS /.ao ly9 y f� na o l /.oo .oo /.oo /.c� /. �• .95 /� I TtEILL- PREPPARED DATE BCHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. OOf•1S1.�t11'1� $5 -350 /991 SvRIEcT. �w,-E i�y S. o„s« ,e�D _ SHEET NO. ��•.•.V.,v �4v�v�� )%a r M�sa►rL CompidEb 17,4FFl e- j Of 3 �. LAME X AoS%otTED You�1t (75� F Lo w -- 4- CFO, /. co /Z� I t� t48 4 . 9s A e0v 38 3 is IY ! t 48 s 4 o 1 s- Y. N X. A 1-few x. )(jxr xfi.T = S -SMURMON mow ADJUSTMENT wORKSHEET Plow LANE CMQMS AD FACTORS he O 4) O O © O O O O ® ® ® an Aeii®.t LAW jded Na of Le Heavy Grade Pkg. &a Area Rift [eft Fbw Sat Lanes Width %% Tian n Rate IdoMeowo Flow f I f f t i t a (P~ N (vpbg) 9-5- 9-6 9 7 9-6 9-9 9-W 9-11 9-12 N ♦Soo /.oo ,Do /,oo /.oo ,oo /o+o /• KB /goo / /.off B' /•oo /.ors /o /co .S Aco /60'Y i /.oD .y /.ucv /.e co /cam /.00 /oo 00 /7!o`/ /.oo ,9'g' .o v /o 0 A coo 1/00 /.coo -Ps- P-7G /$oo / /oo Jr /oo /.on /oo •«o .gS zoo /y9 t E". PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY 85 — 350 .- engineers - 1991 SHEET NO. r . SVBIWP.xouTL /9'Y ,�tD,yiLc.. a — z• 3 pLAMS "sl FLOW Gimc qL C,1Zo P �/ - t •--t- CJ�P. LAMS APT �� Rows C / ` a�wsa F,.ow Fs�ow RaT1� 3� 68 -r Z �I 1 •4 �s� tc�io��r�= .07 ,471 ✓ .oe4- 14 I *loco . •- �3 1. I ZZ I��G .a33 _ _ It • 8�8 _` 1'E�56GT1oN � 3 3 �� •ZSZo �� DeL.�Y- 28 r4r• G9,& 613 9 Los = D 4.l�aa. Pjrat arm Semad• 1 1c L06 O ® ® ® - o si;St+ws; 0 m AppL lane % Gem m 01&� D&Y Lmw D&Y Pr°Weld°" LowV06 GsFOW Ravi° Ratio Lag& d, Gewp d2 faces GnmP GroW (Ddq� mbk x i� _C (sec/veh) � / � Tabk 9-13 (set/r'eh) TAk 9-1 Ems* ( c X 91 47-1 831G.M - J�t Zl N3 t .O 90 0.03 Q .ob /�•O� v � G _• t 90 30.g4 14 ZG.G�► boo 57f6,j G /G•8o G E� •8e 2 S o Z2. 44Z IhS I A00 3'13V 316 .Z95 yo /8.75 4 4 D•/3 .a FII..L: PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. av N BY BY 0.4 cormftiv rs - -3 SD a 88 R5 SUBJECT: rev rE �9 y � c E E a� _ A• � SHEET. �- LANE x = A F Low L� E 2_30 s /,o0 24Z c ' zo c. �s4 1 %; loZ � 1Z, 9s- /, vo 8Z /.00 14o r 2. s�cc� SATURMON FLOW ADjUsrMENT WORKSHEE'I' LANE GROUPS EACPORS OO O O O p ® ® ® Ad® t. O Grade Pkg. Ideal Nn of line Heavy Bus Area w u Left Appr. �"ufe fit. Lines Width 1kh ( Turn Tum hate C''ra'P �, t ( t i i r ( ( s Mors b V cphgpl N a aTAW (rphg) 9-5 9-6 9.7 9.8 9-9 9-� 9.11 9-12 oo /.00 .9� %cry /.00 ,00 l.o�o I.00 /.vo /,oo 4 sg oo I /do .lg /.00 /.00 /.00 /.00 9 /.00 /lv ES / oo /.00 /00 /.ao /.00 C)Zo 93 I LL- PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROTECT NO. _ BY BY DO engnews 1 S-h �0 4 S r 9 9 ,M+ _ rX�i4- SHEET NO. -- SUBJECT: Eor,r� /yy �.� — 2,of3 Fro M/ ,l3tTC'cA� U y.�o p V C r u . 3'W. L.A N E �� ADT �W j�'Cld FL&^15 A m-sts Rap FLOW Fro . 6 S o(P3 z 8 Z 9 1�°IO .4 ✓ 8 � 1 p-f.� _ . 14o 1 •o e o ✓ .1 2 s��ssc,�oN 6 3 �-� S � UWDdff& o AppL r$.� o m m o 0 0 0 Low mwm- X Table 9-13 (W/veh) Mbk 94 (sec) ('t ) X 91 vo 90 Z,v/ � IS,94 . Z <.. � 1 ►, o .00 7,4 13 G.S 3 saZ 0 3.73 ss 1 !ae 9 90 Z g.3 S 3-7,3G V> LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVENUE I PIERCE ROAD AM EXTERNAL ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff }f INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff T ff CYCLE LENGTH C f 90.00 f f } {} ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f 61.60 f f f ff ff NUMBER OF LANES N } 1.00 f f f }# HTOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f 773.00 f f f ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f 591.00 f f } ff HLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f 182.00 f f f ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f 1.00 f f f ff .1• ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f 1.00 f f f ff ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f 829.00 f f f ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f 0.00 f f f ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATc, OPP S(op) f 1800.00 f f f ff ff FLOk RATIO, OPP Y(o) f 0.46 f f f ff ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f 37.35 f f f ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f 0.36 f f f ff ff p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f 1.00 f f f ff i ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f 24.25 f f f ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f 0.00 f f f ff ff INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f 0.00 f f f ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f 3.15 f f f ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) f 0.26 f f f ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f 0.26 f f f ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F 0 PROJECT NUMBER B5 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 FUSSUM OO BLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. t'lsl. flf1g BY /oSl'8� 85 -350 SUBJECT: 1°,91 A,�4 ,S�,u•, ���cE �.4d - - SHEETNO. ✓��, ,4.v� � K ���. coM a��l� Tk•���C 1 f.3 .�-• LAME - X L Z30 S oo z-4 Z N . 9s- /o 0 8� 1 � 7 Zoo 188 �sA . �► a0 2• : s• K X t�y..TNr X �� t� X,�� 1(,T0. �-�ir KT�T - S SMURMON mow ADJUSTmENT WORKSHEET FLOW LANE GROUPS AD FACTORS O 4 O O O O O O O ® ©AW Lae weal Nn cf LArw tkavl► Grade Pka. evs wreaiti�t �1: Laces Width eh Flow ff f f f nrn Rate N f • 9-S 9-6 9.7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 �� 98 '`� oo /oo .?1- /oo /.00 Aoo boo /.00 .9 /4,7& Ng i / occnl 1.00 1.00 ).Go /.vo /,C* /.vd •Z� 330 NS T /goo I /,00 jr l.00 ZOO 400 /too A00/,tom sg 1 Ado .Jg /.00 /.00 too /. /oo Z E:8 /irao / o A oo i PREPARED DATE CMECKED DATE PROJECT NO. �BL - BY - BY $ --3� swo, 2 engineer's A �� s188 19 9 I Pt,X4. Co M3i��D SHEET No. , E �.¢� - - svBECT: �?o�,-� i yy � t�E �.�� 2. .3 L Sw.cih4� �esA - N—. -•-� 4 _ _ _• . r t i . . • . - • APT Sq-T FLoV/ 'CRITICAL- 9 C�'�o p v/C } :. •:-�-- C A +rS LANE �s taw/ F�oW RAT1a IF a Roup p'' .03 1 Z& ` -+ / Z b3 23 - ✓ .(oG ir32 ix �..�3 S- -- 1� IOC ✓ . 1 � DSLAYs IZ•44 1-oS = DdW& milt arm ® O o►s,c�c O 4 m O ° ° ° ° p�o�C° -,woe, LAW law AWL t w/c Gam Cre D&r � Da&y F: c.�ayp r D&y Gob C�aep R X° Ratip L c (W%�) cffmcky (�veh) PF �r � (�/� 91 lrfore- T"9-13 (W/vim teb (�) 'c ) X 91 90 3Z•28 Z4 9 l.b NEWS 57.Z 413 0 7.3(0 7-46 7.L4 1.0 14, p 'R t_ o �Sq r 6 I,ZS .�-� 5,2-7 Q , S8 •� •�,9 go 7�S� r� Z•,St. .eo !. 10.73 400 39.3G 39. . � 90 z� 3 v LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR MORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVE. & PIERCE ROAD -- AN COMBINED -------- -----------------------------------------------------*f �} INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND # SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff f#---- ------------------ -----------------------------------------4f ## CYCLE LENGTH C f 90.00 f # # f* f# EFFECTIVE GREEN g f 59.80 # # # #f ## NUMBER OF LANES N f 1.00 # # f ** #*TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE vial f 1005.00 f # * #* ## MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f 823.00 # f f f* #FLEE; 76RN FLOW RATE v(LT) f 182.00 # f * ff f# PROPORTION OF LTP%Li$ f 1.00 # # # #* f# OPPOSING LANES N(0) f 1.00 # f f ff ## OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f 886.00 f # f #* ff PROP LT IN-OPP VOL P(LTO) f 0.00 # f *f ##------------- -------- ---------------------------------------#* , ##---- ------- --------------------------------------------------## ## COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f NESTBOUND ## ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f 1800.00 f # # f# f# FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f 0.49 *"/a GRN NOT BLOCKED 9(u) f 30.53 # # # ## f# LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) # 0.32 # # * ## f# p/a LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f 1.00 # # # f# ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f 29.27 f # # ## f# p/a TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f 0.00 # # # #* ff INITIAL p/o GRN 9(f) f 0.00 # f # ## f# TH EQUIVALENT E(L) # 3.50 # # # f# ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(f) # 0.21 # # # ## H LT FACTOR f(LT) # 0.21 # # # ## ##------------------------- ----- ----------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 r r� i •, PREPARED PARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT r OOruffi 1g er 4rleerS BY 4 1S BY o g8 85-3 5o SUBJECT: Sut j VA al AVE- F AjZ'N40kTA SO:'PP;46j 199, A•M� SHEET NC Ex-rimer-E -ne�4�rL 1 of 3 Vaw. L 01-7--+11.1�3 �0, 14 4 U�A 1 3 .93 3 --0 F 1/3 StiT�w4T1oN SATURATION FLOW ADJUMMENT WORKSHEE I Prow LANE GROUPS AD STMENT FACTORS p © © O OO OO O OO 0 ® ® ® Ad A at —' Appc Lame Ideal Na of Lane %Vy Grade Pkg. Bus Area Tit, Left Sat Lanes Width locka8e Type 'lam Rat Mo�vealents Flow f E f f f f f f (pcphgpl) N Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table (vphg) 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 1 9-12 1800 .93 ,aS 1.0 .o I-o I-c /.o •5Z Ss3 Ito /.© 1,0 1,c /.o 1&4 1 .ioJg� !.o /.o I.o l,o --4 i8co I 11.o .9b 1.0 1 /.o 1,0 /.o 1l•oawn >� lSoo I1 /-0 19e) /-o /.o /,o /,o . 09 /.o i�o I.o3 .90 ,o bo I.o I.t� ,S 1.0 RJSS&OT�- PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT'NO. a7 00 6— _f_®el''S BY 8Y S-I�s io /q�2t�1A-�-19 ShbPP/� �99� SUB1ECc: svU-4��-�! v�El z, ( 3 3.UP, LAN E A T. SAT. Ft,ovvrFLovjSmom- 9 c,'Ro p V C --i-- �aa �' FLOW Fc.ow RAT10 C R� �v4Z ,OZ 5" ~- • -r !01d 1b Z . 753 /2.3G .4 . . __ • 753 /Z(�L . 408 /�= • `���• -'� Z 3 D .OHO Z . 148 193 . DIG T ;._' 44S ._. ,�.5 Z ,0 ✓ .148 Z30 , 49 / •R.srcno _ Iq 8 ZG9 .3oS' � ~ - DELAY-0 4.tsirrsl. � hest�ra� Seooe�d�m 'Mal jc Us • ' e P sdMac O ® Q> O _ O O O 4 � ® ® ® AFpL LAne % Caeea C�tk Day► Lane I�ne LLOS rAdo R8119 d, C oW � r C•eop CwP � b4m X 6/C C (sec/veh) Capo&y (seyv�eh) PF Delay L S (sec/�) Lbk a (� C Tabk 9-13 (sec/veh) 'able 94 • ) x4D 94 •♦j .oZ S .753 90 27, 13 47- .O ZI 3 . 4R4 .7s3 qo 3.3 2 3G 017 b o 3,sg 3.sS A 4 8 453 96 31 D1 /ZUG 0' /Z /,p 3, 14 3, t 4 A r_ .plL .148 90 Z4.88 /93 0 !.Q M,M C f% v .00 •ab 96 Zs,0 32 . 0 L zs,os = ,4ql -9Z clo LG,77 230 t,3L Z8,i3 W f- • so:; .14p 90 ZG,Do ui9 O.zj to Z4.z D Z7132 17 -` LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVE. AT ARMATA'S DRIVEWAY 1991 AM PEAK - EXTERNAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ## INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND # SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND �} #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------## ## CYCLE LENGTH C # 90.00 # 90.00 # 90.00 f 90.00 ## }# EFFEC'IVE GREEN g # 68.30 f 68.30 f 12.70 f 12.70 ff ## NUMBER OF LANES N f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 H **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f 626.00 # 516.00 f 19.00 f 195.00 ff H MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) # 610.00 f 454.00 # 16.00 # 113.00 ff ffLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) # 16.00 f 62.00 f 3.00 f 82.00 ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f 1.00 # 0.12 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ## OPPOSING LANES N(0) f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff f# OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f 454.00 f 610.00 f 113.00 f 16.00 ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTG) f 0.12 f 0.00 # 0.00 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND # SOUTHBOUND # EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff - ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f 1560.58 f 1800.00 f 1800.00 f 1B00.00 ff #f FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f 0.29 f 0.34 f 0.06 # 0.01 ff ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f 59.40 f 57.18 # 7.52 f 12.01 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f 0.59 f 0.49 f 0.80 f 0.87 ff ff p/a LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f 1.00 # 0.12 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff p/o 8RN BLOCKED g(q) f 8.90 f 11.12 f 5.18 f 0.69 ff �- ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f 0.00 # 0.88 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff ff INITIAL p/o 8RN g(f) # 0.00 f 7.46 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff #f TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f 1.90 f 2.28 f 1.40 f 1.30 ff #f LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) # 0.52 f 0.87 f 0.74 # 1.00 ff #f LT FACTOR f(LT) f 0.52 f 0.87 # 0.74 f 1.00 ff #f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBERA 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 FUSSUMBLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT 1` cors ltl v erlglnews BY BY � io 88 85-350 SUBJECT: :5ULA_VA#-A AVE- 4 AjZM#wTA SFbPP 41-� 1991 A A'I SHEET NO CoMg��1E� -rz?.�r�iL of 3 vow0 impF, 1 ; FI�.o� - - - - , OT -- /OI 1 I t— + --�•-- /8/ I I I —9;- r�MA'T74 ' -SaoPPi*•�i -- �i z4_ SON - -� V� •— -- ;T - ---- t' - --� "'r 10; IDS 1 1 ZCJI.cto .+�A►,•J _ Ave. m 1 *,! r��-7 �hG . '.-X_T V �Txr_Y_f,.T S _ SAnMAnON FLOW ADJUM MEN T WORKSHM FLOW LANE GROUPS AD FACTORS QQ p © 0 s0 © O O OO ® ® ® Ade at Appr. Lame Ideal Na of Lane Heavy Cade Pkg. Bus Area Right Left FI Croup Sat. Lanes Width *h lockage f Turn Tian Rate Morita Flow f f f f f f f f a (pcphgpl) N e a a a e a e able ' (��) 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 18001 93 ,*S Ito l.o Ito !.0 /.0 .48 757 moo 1 106 ,9 to /i o /.0 1.0 1.0 .o l" L lo 1.0 1.011.o Ito .77 130/ . o -0 9 /•o 1.0 !,D b0 I-C) . 3 1 ZA30 la 70, l Soo I bo .9e) l.0 11.0 to 1,0 ,e o 1s90 Jaoo to-3 Lo bo - I.o 1.0 m 1-0 k18 I /.03 o98 to 1-0 I.o IbO 1.0 Ira 2j;0PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PRO1ECr NO. ' �u. BY BYIcorisLJ 85'— • ,q,eMR-�-�9 SHbPPir-l�--�► �9�l A•M• sHEErr NO. suwBcr.- svc.uv+,4 /}v�E� c_oq jj►•1 Z TrAFFiG 2 f 3 it 3' LANE ADT SAT. F,,/ O tMegL U U�o P V C .--t-- R� F _._ -17 16 .OZD 79Z It z 3 .OUR v � 1104 .5310 ✓ .111 l 3O4 •�D .� •QOZ . /off ► � •o z z � - = •-- Z 3 _ . & 77 /no l7o .D 9 _ ..c0 Z 04 . 1o8 /96 . 418 = �S DE�aY 7 1-O s = f3 Seooee'TkrmVda � Duos Stwt O ® AD O _ O O O Lane Lane ® AM AFFL [.ane V/c C.eem Oyde Delay tm Delay PrO °" p �,roW Delay tA6 Raeio tLtio LaWeh d,1 iA6 (�/� .� ON. x C (S«/� �r (m«/�) PF Delay went c Tabk 9-23 (SCC/veh) MAAe 91 • ) X M 94 -fj p ZL .7�gZ 90 l•s 1 3 300 /,00 /,0 4.tq A 4.1.5 .sss .79z 9d z,&s /03 o o.sz /.0 3• 0 3, .j08 go z-7.Zs 139 0 /.0 z 7. Z8 E8 or .o94 .108 90 Z7#� 70 D.o/ Z7.so 7P �fC, F ,& .673 408 cin Z9.34 /&8 4,76 3�•13 D w 1 jus 90 za's-0 /9lo 0.BG 10 z9..3e D 33• D LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVE. AT ARMATA'S DRIVEWAY 1991 AM PEAK - EXTERNAL ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff CYCLE LENGTH C f 90.00 f 90.00 f 90.00 f 90.00 }} EFFECTIVE GREEN g f 71.80 f 71.90 f 9.20 f 9.20 ff NUMBER OF LANES N f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff HTOTAL APP. FLOW RATE vial f 896.00 f 575.00 f 19.00 f 195.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(i) f 880.00 f 513.00 f 16.00 f 113.00 ff HLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f 16.00 f 62.00 f 3.00 f 82.00 # ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f 1.00 f 0.11 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f 513.00 f 880.00 f 113.00 f 16.00 ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f 0.11 f 0.00 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUNr. f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f 1421.97 f 1800.00 f 1800.00 f 1800.00 ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f 0.36 f 0.49 f 0.06 f 0.01 ff ffp/a GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f 61.53 f 54.39 f 3.79 f 8.48 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f 0.55 f 0.33 f 0.80 f 0.87 ff ff p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(i) f 1.00 f 0.11 f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff p/a GRN BLOCKED g(q) f 10.27 f 17.41 f 5.41 f 0.72 ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f 0.00 f 0.89 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff ff INITIAL p/a GRN g(f) f 0.00 f 10.41 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f 2.03 f 3.46 f 1.40 f 1.30 ff -- ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) f 0.48 f 0.77 f 0.73 f 1.00 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f 0.48 f 0.77 f 0.73 f 1.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F Ec 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85-350 SHEET 3 OF 3 r K. s r FF`USS&01VEILL ore PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT N - -lc r ulta� engineers B BY �olS�88 �S-3.Sa SUBJECT: 0200TO75 F S c�. , :v s}w1 A of. 9 9 f A' M. SHEET NO Ex r�e ,4.C. F�►G 1 of 3 >.� M� p Few 1/owME ----- - --T - IL -- Z /IDS 1 .8l0 �.OO f Ze� -- - ----- - - -- � �-- Qii --. -+ --- --- -- - -------- lei 4►----fig- •. -, -i-� +�-fi 1v1. 60 - -- P'0- Z. ==- - - -- - e X. __. .Y,_._- -0 w!-- • � - �l zt__-�c a- X�> �+ .�-r-:— -, s�r�w�noN SATURAMN FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEEI P1.oM/ LANE GROUPS AD FACPORS 0 OO OO 0 OO © O OO OO 0 0 ® Ad'.Sat Appr. Lane ideal Na of Lane %Vy Grade Pkg. Bus Area Right Leh F� Sat Lanes Width ge 'Ijrpe Turn 7um Rate Movements Flow f f E f f fE E f s (pcphgpl) N Table Tablea able Table Table a (vphs) 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-1111 9-12 oo 1 bo 1.0 1.0 /.0 /,o ,9 1743 t /2)oa z I.oS .98 !,o /.o /.o 1.o /10 C�. 1 1.0 9 I.0 to I.0 to .0 1( o bo 090 l,o I,o o l.o ,991 I}o -� /500 1 , o .98 1,0 1.0 /.0 t o ,O .zz -349 i job-+ ,90 1.6 1.D 1.0 1.D j ."z to �-- i boo 1.9.31 9 1. bo 1.U .S 5'- /.o /39 WIS 4*r (BOO 11.0 198 I.0 1,0 1, 1'0 bo 1-1�- L.L PREPARED DATE CHBECKED DATE PROTECt NO. i 'v A.—I q�t 19 9r 1 A.NI• SHEET NO. SUB�EC'f: ROc1'r� S € S sJ tJ.•� � of E�,rZr••1 -new G 2, • ' • . •- • t • • • 1 ' 3.UP LANE APT SAT. FLOVWV c�mc - S U'Rop V f . •--�-- ?An Flows C /C - Ft-ow/ FLOW 0 - • <o loot .Z 73' 1 Z I Zoo 3 3Co -7 349 OZO Aol 140 oSa I , lzo — ,833 TERSELTI4N -_ . � .33 ✓ . 401 3 DE>�Y= Z 3.3 3 _ Los _ G QIPP ad spa I"Ddaft�os •seem O ® m O 8 . O O O 4 ® ® - Low w/c Gee m Ojde Delay bane Lane AM us Ratio RAO tM4& d, Group do FKIM Grcup Group WAY bbvs X S/�G C (sec/veh) Capa&y (sa/veh) PF Delay [OS (aec/vVh) 'able b (Secl c T&W 9-13 (sec/veh) Tabu 9-1 • ) X M 94 4) .oSb IZD 41,3!L41, 3S f .91Z izo 31, q¢ 8 07,13 Z�•3a 1j �1 tZO al.Z/o 4 • > S �3 1 ZD ZZ•78 1 ?+ Z, 3 .8 C,i G .2 3.9� ._ lzo /G.lr4 14o 0 .�4 ` Z I gaol 9 Q& 0,7 1.0 •83 t 4r . 8 t.so j.c 1 33 D 2o•t I G LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 & SULLIVAN AVENUE AM EXTERNAL _ **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff *f INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff tt CYCLE LENGTH C f f f 120.00 f 120.00 ff tf EFFECTIVE GREEN 9 t f t 43.10 f 43.10 ff *f NUMBER OF LANES N * f f 1.00 f 1.00 ft **TOTAL APR. FLOW RATE v(a) f f t 29.00 f 507.00 ff ** MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(v) f f f 22.00 f 507.00 ff **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f t t 7.00 f 450.00 ff tf PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f t f 1.00 f 0.89 ff tt OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 2.00 f 1.00 tf ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) t t f 795.00 f 22.00 ff ** PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) t f f 0.57 f 0.00 tt ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND ff *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f f 3068.16 f 1800.00 ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f f 0.26 f 0.01 ff ffplo GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) t f f 16.21 f 42.15 ff *t LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f 0.38 f 0.86 ff tf p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f t f 1.00 f 0.89 ff - tf p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f f f 26.89 f 0.95 ff *f p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f t 0.00 f 0.11 ff ff INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) t f f 0.00 f 0.16 ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f f 2.98 f 1.31 ff -- ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(l) t f t 0.22 f 0.86 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.22 f 0.86 ff tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F is 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT arm- ��� T corg;L ting engineers B BY _ 9S-3sa SUBJECT: 200TW7s £ s�c.0�•4�•1 �vE. '99 A•� SHEET NO -- t3iM4ED -ne.A G j f 3 UL ► Fi.o, � I li� � Co 6860 00 -7t" r. —'t1 439 .e( -1. 00 .4- -b4 x,.7LtJ.2 Z. ' -- - - - - -- - s,�� „oN SATURAMN FLOW ADJUSTMENT woRKSHEET LANE GROUPS AD FAC70RS O ) OO O Os O O OO OO ® ® 0 Ad* at Appr. Lane Ideal Na of Lane Heavy Grade Pkg. &a Area Right Deft FloHr Group Sat Lanes Width Wh Turn •ILm Rate Mots Flow f fmv f f fbbff fRT fLT a (pcp'kgpl) N Table Tablea a Table Table TableTable- (vphg) 9-5 9-6 9 7 1 9-8 9-9 9-10 1 9-11 9-12 11 oa l.o A0 bo 11.0 1.0 to I 1,0 ,9- 1-7 3 18 t /2)00 1,0 1-0 bo 0 ,c/ /10 3553 l}. 1 j.o 9 bo t0 1.0 to 1.0 IG�o s$ �� 1e)00 z 1,o ,o /Z l•o to 1. 0 34 .4 o I o .98 /,o 1.0 /.o to /,0 ,23 �t3 1800 ( .8-+ ,9e) 1.6 /.0 1.0 I•C) .9c) /•o 1� �-- 1800 .93 . 98 I.o 1. 1•o 1.0 .SS' 10 /39 W$ alLr 1500 1 1.0 sc S to 1.0 1.0 1.0 bo 8(0 1ST' PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. OOf' L�19 im gri e1^5 BY 8Y --- --SUBJECT: Ro cT r� S � s v t.t�v�4�.t A%t E- . 1991 A , SHEET N0. of CoMr3i r��D -new G 2 - _. .. 3' LANE ADT SAT. F�O VV CRmc� Y •--'-- A�"na 1�oup14 Ft.ow F:Low RATIa Flows C �C t - tcst. � I 8 43 00 ✓ o oWz .. .•._t Z N% .363 ✓ .4 3 � -4 3l0 .0r ,4o t 04 1 : : ! kl=tom., �o TERSGGTION DELAY= j.oS = G own r 4.la�a. �S Q ® m O . O O O O O tmw v/c_ Com Cede D&y Lmw PmptsdmLane � Appc Rdb &* � d, Gg*W Dd y FaCkff Gecw Go* Oda? ws Mere- X VC C (sec/veh) CPac7 (ow/`eh) PF Dday LOS (Sec/vd* MMe sum c Table 9-13 (sec/veh) MMe !-1 "XG 94 ` 4) 8 IZD 1,34 90 O/ ¢I,3S rJ8 � 120 3300 3.i4 z �q/ � �qr7 rD 1Zo 3r•34 43Z S,7Z 7,V6 5 8 iZo z z,a14 ,S z-f& IZo G:G 3 � O IG. 3 to -- '� Z0 0,&3 9 ZO 4 1.0 38 13 wB � S 4o I t�'-� 6.0 9 .o 31, s �o.07 G -- LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 & SULLIVAN AVENUE AM COMBINED _ f}--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND # SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND it **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff CYCLE LENGTH C f f f 120.00 * 120.00 if ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f * f 44.00 f 44.00 f* ** NUMBER OF LANES N * * f 1.00 f 1.00 ff *#TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f # * 29.00 f 510.00 *f ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f f f 22.00 f 510.00 ff **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f # 7.00 f 453.00 ff *f PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f # f 1.00 * 0.89 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 2.00 f 1.00 ff - ** OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) * f * 776.00 f 22.00 *f ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f f f 0.58 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------#f ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS # NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND f* _ **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** f* SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f * 3053.84 f 1800.00 ff *f FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f f 0.25 f 0.01 *f ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f 16.11 f 43.06 ff ** LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f 0.39 f 0.86 ** ff p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) * f f 1.00 f 0.89 ff ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f * f 25.89 f 0.94 ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) # * f 0.00 f 0.11 ff ff INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f f f 0.00 f 0.16 ff *f TH EQUIVALENT E(L) * * * 2.88 f 1.31 ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) f f f 0.23 f 0.86 ff *# LT FACTOR f(LT) # f * 0.23 f 0.86 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff r' F 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 - FUSS&UNEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT' N( consulting engineers BY �0 68 85 35D SUBJECT: SO(.Li V A►.1 AVf 991 A4 SHEET NO. - CoM 3 r�!� �2�F�=►G 1 Of 3 Ar Vow 0 ' LA ME P V4 Am 35+ boo 4,50 fj-*ox,,A- , - -- --- -- - -�--- �-- - -� _�-E!;� -to_'---, 7 1 srp 1. 60 - -. ----�-- -�-- -- 439 70 ; �------ S�`'w�7o'i SATURAMN FLOW ADJUSIMENT WORKSHEET LANE GROUPS AD FACTORS O OO 4 O Os O O OO OO ® ® ® AWL ® AM Line ideal Naof Lane Heavy Grade Pk& Bus AreaRight Left croup Sat Lanes Width Wh Turn 76M Rate Momments Flow f fmV I f f f f1m f a (pcphgpl) N a e MiMe MiMea (vPhB) 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 - oa /.o .99) .0 1.0 I.o /.o /,o 173 4s t1' /2)00 z 103 .9b /.0 /.o 1.0 /.a /•0 110 loco 1 I.o-4- .92) /,o to /.O 1.0 . 8 AO 1&04! 66 1500 Z 1•o 90 14 /.d 1.0 10 nL 1,o -� /boo 1 ,50 ,98 /.O I ro /.o to1-/,?%O.W ,t3 t Soo ( 115-+ ,9 1.d i.o 1.0 1.0 1.o �— I2)00 .93 , q8 1.0 1.0 1•o to as /.o 139 W8 -,,6r (boo 1 1.0 1.98) 10 f-0 - 1.0 110 l•O .x f?- PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. i� OOf''ajtdng Bf lglrl ''S BY BY 35a s4s io 85 . 1991 a,M- SHEET NO. SUBJECT: Ro cTr'E 5 � S v u�+�'�� A J C -- UP7ar/4m PO4,04 _. 3.GP LANE A>7. SAT. FtovN CRmc�++- N E •_ Pa c9 y-a;oUP v� .�- sa Roue FLOW FLOW RKno Ftiows C c . ._.. . . 41 43 "moo ✓ So 90 '0 eq l0 4 sb Z3 ,►8 S .(Oro ��hrrto� to� �*Oc= • i , Xr 741 ` �► Z IZO9 3494 .363 ✓ 43 I Z I b34, ' li— r _ -�' 3 7- 40 49- 04 -.) = -.lz,o — �'' 3 ZZ ISZZ .a►4- .4a Z r 2 0 '� 3t 5 543 3 94TERSGGTION " �orL De�Y= ZZ•s3 3 Si0 �S/ 3 3�0 ✓ .4G Z Q 8 3 0- S _ C 4•l�rsa, GMWI i+Int'hrsnD&Y Seamd D&T UWDday&US •fs.twr O ® m O . O O . O O O ® 1 ® ®- -- two r/e c m Cycle Detail tans D&Y Psar+ewm Lane Lane AM _ Uft Ratio Urq& d, CmV de Fft-w CcmT Q=V D&y US Aft"- X S/C C (sec/veh) Capo&y (sec/veh) PF Ddap LOS (.«/VdO MMe mum ( a Table9-13 (sec/veh) MMe 94 ( ) X 4D 94 4) ceci osz go 41.34, 90 0,01 9' 06 1 t !.e ,Zo 34•s< I:?: z 3.74 D Z::�,o 3 D • (;' .S •Z ,18S i7o 33.8 Z9R I. .?-z 2�•8o D (e(oZ IZO Z�.BS 3 .Z(o 30.14 D . •834 ,43 IZO zz.84 i Z.% v.4Z G 73.1Z3 C. —�` 64 ,4oZ IZo 16.G3 14 0,00 1.0 ! • 4oz. tzo &r z p•0 0 /,p I6'. e I f�.5'�- G 'T 8 .40 1 .0 z4•st, /o 9 .o 3 .4S .D l8.93 G LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVE & ROUTE 5 AM COMBINED ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------}� ff CYCLE LEN6TH C } } 120.00 f 120.00 ff EFFECTIVE 6REEN g 44.20 f 44.20 ff } NUMBER OF LANES N } f } 1.00 f 1.00 }} ffTOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f f f 29.00 f 510.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f } f 22.00 f 57.00 ff HLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f f 7.00 f 453.00 ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f f 1.00 f 0.89 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 2.00 f L.00 ff ff OPPOSINS FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 776.00 f 22.00 ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f f f 0.56 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f f 3053.84 f 1800.00 ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f f 0.25 f 0.01 ff ffp/o 6RN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f 18.38 f 43.26 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f 0.39 f 0.86 ff ff p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f 1.00 f 0.89 ff ff p/o 6RN BLOCKED g(q) f f f 25.82 f 0.94 f# ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f f 0.00 f 0.11 ff ff INITIAL p/o 6RN g(f) f f f 0.00 f 0.16 ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f f 2.88 f 1.31 ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) f f f 0.23 f 0.86 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.23 f 0.86 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 {_ SHEET 3 OF 3 t r� R ONEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKEL, DATE PROJECT NO. 0cormifing engineers BY BY 'D�lO /0'3' gS--as-o SUBJECT: •eau.T-At Wo E�e�� �, — 199 1 A.H. SHEET NO. 4FAAeM4 rbN 1►D m �' �x7 oee-4(.._ Ta2AFFiG / of/ WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH �s uTE 30 Major Street:E„•^r6�"' 2a. N --- _ ..w—Vs— 38'7 Nm1 Vs-38 e5q6 V, Grade b9S— V2 V 4—q3 /6_ VS VS �N=Q 3 P� V�Vo -� V?V, Date of Founts- Q'StOP _ Tune Arriod: '� Z(, O YIELD Z 9 339 Average Thinning Speed: N=0 Minor Street % E,etE VOLUMEADJUMMMM A400venent Na 2 3 4 5 7 9 Vdu ne(vph) Z 6. '305 NU(x;ft see Table 10-1 /DZ Z q 331 STEP k Kr ft+om Minor Street r•V, y I '�` GonBicting Flow,Vc 1/2 VS+V2= Q + -g�vph(Va) Critical Gap,Tc,and Potmtial Capacity,cp T�_ sec(Table 10-2)cp,_ -302 pcph(Fg. 10-3) Aral Capacity,c. =cp,= 3zypcph i STEP 1 LT Fro®Major Street r V4 Conflicting Flow,Vc V,+V2= �8 + = 9i3 vph(V.) 1 Critical Gap,T�,and Pbtential Capacity,cp TC sec(Table 10-2)cp,_41 pcph(Fig. 10-3) Paco rt of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor(Fig. W-5) (V,/cp.)X 1W= P4_ .B Z Actual Capacity,c. CwA=cp4_-410 pcph STEP 3:LT From Minor Street V, Cmfik ing Flaw,V, 1/2 V3+V2+Vs+V4_-T+P2 +387+-U s 13M vph m,) Critical Gap,T�,and Pbtential Capacity,cp T,_ -7 1 sec(Table 10-2)cp,= q pcph(Fig. 10-3) Actual Capacity,c. c,,,,=co,x P4= 9,� X _--7-P-pcph SHARED-LANE CAPACITY ve SH v,+vo if lane is shared -- = (V7/C,7)+(V./c,,,) ,.OU c LOS Motierrsent Na v( ) ( ) ( ) ; 7 9 49 7E 9 3 9 3zv -i9 3F 4 /0z 410 300 wrI3 FUSS&CYNEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. 2 OOf1.S1, *6 V 0-4rnews BY BY .fie.,�-AC ..?o l 9 ' SHEET NO. SUBJECT: tea. FAAO"fp MAJ M0000 Cnl�'VII��I�I E'7> T�AFFiG e of WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS HOURLY VOWMES VOLUMES IN PCPH IQs eJTre 3� Major Street:Fr A"—J&ra,v Zv. N N=Q --_ V,3e7 V2--� v, 3 Grade egs— V2 v/29 v Q96 fig— V., �N= D — _ s sT� v'Vo I Date of Counftft I ( Q'STOP i L9 3510 Time Paw& zv 3$ O YIELD Running 4eed:-J2v* N— Minor Street: PHF: Grade 0 96E,ecE !zD VOWMEADJUMMENTS Movement Na 2 � 3 4 5 7 9 Vdume(vph) Val.(pcph�see table 10-1 /S 3 Z 9 3570 STEP L•Kr from Minor Street es-V, I FILM►,Vc 1/2 V,+v2= 9 + f s= 90--4ph(Vc,) Critkd Gap,Tc,and Potential Capacity,cp TC sec(Table 10-2)c.,, _pcph(Fg.10 3) Actual Capacity,cam, c,,,=cp,—.Z 5pcph STEP L LT From Major Street j V, I coneictirwg Fkw,Vc v,+V2= 18 + = 9r 3 „ph(vc4) Critical Gap,Tc,and Potential Capacity,cp TC=r�c sec(Table 10-2)c.,= pcph(Fig.10-3) Pleroent of cp Udlized and Impedance Factor(Fig. 10-5) (v./cp,)X 100=_ P._ • 2 I Actual Capacity,c„„ CtM=cp,= 430 pcph 1 STEP 3:LT Fro®Minor Street V7 f -' Conflicting Flaw,V. 1/2 V3+V2+Vs+V4_ + + +l — 143 vph(V,,) Critical Gap,T�,and Potential Capacity,cp T,— sec(Table 10-2)cp,— pcph(Fig. 10-3) Actual Capacity,cO1 c,,,,—cp,X P,— 95 X-1Z — G 8 pcph SHARED-LANE C PACTrY SH— v7+v, if lane is shared (v7/C"7)+(v./c A) Movement Na v( ) (pcph) ( ) c LOS 7 Z 9 !�B E 9 350 32�'' 3ZS - 2S F i r4 /53 430 430 Z�7 DATE CHECKED DATE PRo1E ( N�� PREPARED CT N now. OOPLSIJit�G�1'191f'>�!'S � BY BY /0-3-88 susJEcr: SL .,R V At-4 tIO44CDY 04A�•f 19 9 •M• SHEET NO. WORKSH 'EI'FOR FOUR-LEG IN I EMSEMONS HotrxLY VcwMes y . N—Y1EL�dj s2 Vss Vie N I � V. !o N—C Vs GS�f— N—Q] V. 4 Grade�_96 r Grade Q9L � V,� asajor road ,3/7 V= yt-t_r V A*4 O VS • s7op O N—Q V,Vi Vo YIELD O Date of cotarim s 1 as n*wroad Z-nne pc;od- ,M. PEA4- rgtaV9_b9-WIC Average Wuming •s2�,� r PHF: Grade % VOWME ADJUS MINTS Mov amt Na 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - - vokmw(vph) 6 317 0 0 (,Sl (, D po 1 3 O 9 voL(pcph)see mdAe 30-1 9 d 0 L v 3 /0 vowMES IN PCPH NA r22 rsl rle V6 NA VS--" ^. p v NA v� v 7 NA v:v) v� v� v� 005 STEP L•Kr From Mtoor Street FI FV. J Vu Cmdkting Flows,V, 1/2 V,+V,—V q 1/2 Ve+Vs—Vas: Critical Gaps,T,(Tabs 3D-2) (sec) 67 0 ( c) Pom tial Cqmft c,(Fi6.W) cr.— &Z 0 pcph c,12— YI 0 pcph Pace of ev Mud (v,/crq)x 300——96 (V,2/cr,j�xp300— 96 bwedam Tec'm P(Fi6.W-5) P.— / _ P12— Acbud Capacity.c. cat—cre pcph Cmi 2—Ss 2 pcph raft] L.L. - PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO 2 Opxlt19 BY BY 8S—3� via ro-3-� SUBJECT- SVu_i14^14 AVG # 4&-N,,4eby ROAD/ 9 91 bv� SHEETNO. S iTr �>zV eWA-r . A 1. -TLAFF--,G Z f Z STEP 2:LT From Major Street � V. —� V, Con6kft Flows,V, V3+Vr—VG V6+Vs—V� Critical Gap,Ti(fah W-2) s• (sec) S,�( ) Potential Capacity,c,(Fig.Xp-3) c1,�—— pcph - cp1= , r o pcph Pamt of c.Utilized (v./r j X 100 Q_% (v,/cPj X 100= % WWWanm Factor,P(Fig.W-5) Ps—--1 P,= Actual Capacity,c. c,..—cr._—224 pcph c.,—cri_ _pcph STEP 3:TH Front Minor Street 1 Vs V 11 Cm icft Flows.Vc 1 V2+V1+V*+VS+V4—vs 1/2 b Vs+V4+V3+VZ+VI—Vcl1 + +�+ 3 + 5'�+�+ + + 0 =0 vph —+ �_ �v r►ph Critical Gap,Tc(fah W-2) �.S(sec) �.S(sec) Potential Capacity,cp(Fig.10-3) cg= 4„— Pacent of c.Utilized (Vdcpj X 100— % (v11N�X 100— % Impedance Factor,P(Fi&W-5) Ps— 1 P„ Actual Capacity,c,. c,.r—cM X P1 X P4 c.,,—cp11 X P,X P4 = x x X Q cph) x (pcph) STEP 4:LT From Minor Street V, LVIO -- C=4kting Plows,V, V.,(step 3)+V11+V12—V,7 V.„(step 3)+Va+V,—V to +_0 + =1Mvph R8 +12=.75 vph Critical Gap,T,(fah 10-2) 8-0 (sec) -O (sec) Potential Capacity,c,(Fi&10-3) c.,—' 13 5 pcph trio—--1,33 pcph Actual Capacity,c. c.,—co,X P1 X P.x P ,X P12 c.,,o—co,o X P4 X P,X Pe X P, f32 —.135 x .�� x i38 =ill x-J--x X—L—X--Ll(pcph) I d!L x X (pcph) SHARE LANE CAPACITY MOOR S'I'BEET AFFMA CH MOVEME M 7,8,9 Movemat v(Pqh) c,.(Pcph) cm(pcph) 4—CSH — V LOS 7 8 O — 9 AIR STREE?APPRDACH bI 1q,IL 22 Lfov+ent v(pcph) c.(pr-ph) 4H(pcph) cR—cam, — v Los 10 3 /3 8 to 11 0 — Z7¢ 1o1 G 12 /D 3410 310 3�0 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 13t v(pcph) L(pcph) cam cm — v Los 4 D FtJSS&0T48LL . PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NI ccx sLA*V erxj f1eers BY BY Ss-3s� SUBJFC'l.: SW1.1Ate. SHEET NO. 5 iTC DZgZWAY U.rnBIIV E D -�f�iG / f ,2 .r WORKSHEEI'FOR FOURS-LEG INTERSEMONS HOURLY VOLUMES aNNEDI�TJ• Grade x STOPO °3 N-0 YIELDO VJs2 Vss Voo N ,/ I � �y. b N—[I] -.__vs G 19 N—� • y� S! — trade Qx trade Qx V, maim road va s—� STOP O N—Q V,VII V9 YIELD O ILL Date of counts: a 8 minor road/Z ° Sr Time Ph�iod: IL r sRaiE2 bZvE Average gu=,=,ing SpeW-6'2,p,.e PHF: — Grade x VOLUME ADJUSrMENTS Movement Na 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10112 12 voknm(vph) 8 3n sr zsj 6,sq 6 /z D ss- 3 0 cl %L(Pcph�set Wile 10-1 Io VOLUMES IN PCPH � a3 NA w12 Vol w10 v6 NA v q V. Z7 ld NA v' NA vz v v'FFI _ t STEP 1:RT From Minot Street 1 Vs J v,. . C=Aicti%Flows.V, 1/2 V,+V.—VA 1/2 Vs+Vs—vcf2 CritkW cap.T,(Uh 10-2) (sec) _Ssec) Pbtential Cq*A*y,c,(ram.10-3) cr.— PcF& Su— 38 r pcp}, Pace t of cr UtWzed (vwcpq)X 100 x (vo%►s2)X=—..1—x hWedance RkcbMP ft W-5) P.— -94 P12— 8 aLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC � d-Q BY BY 8S-3sz SUBJECT: SV W N A W A V G € KEN 4 EDY RDADI 1 5 g 1 PA SHEET NO. SiTL �12ivEW14� NEP -M#9rr,G Z of Z STEP 2;LT Firm Major Street V. V, Cad ictft Flows V, V3+V2—Vcs Vs+Vs—V., -- �+,317 - ,3 7Z Vph +(00 vph _ Critical Gap,Ti(Tah 10-2) Potential capacity,cr(ES-*3) c„,= pcph cr,_—�L�pcph Pa+eent of er Utilized (Vs/era X Wo % (VI/cri)x E10— 2 % Impedance Factor,P(H&11-5) Ps= P,— Actual Capacity,c. c..—cv.— pcph c.,=cr,_ pcph — STEP 3:TH From Mlinoi Street I Vs , V„ Conflicting Flows,V, 1/2 V=+Vt•1-Vs+Vs+Vs=V� 1/2 s Vs+V4+V3+V2+V1=V.11 6 + 251= Vph Critical Gap,Tc(Tah 10-2) �'S(sec) '4'S(sec) Potential Capacity,c.ft 10-3) crs— cr„— Percent of er Utilized (VI/era X 100— % (V„/co l)X 100— % Impedance Factor,P(Fi&W-5) P.— L _ pit— 1 Actual Capacity,c. L—cM X P,X Ps Call—co„X P,X P4 x x x +) X (pcph) STEP 4:IT From Minor Street �V, LVIO Conflicting Flows,V,, V,*(sY 3)+V„+V,2—V 7 V,„(step 3)+Vs+Vq a V,,o Critical Gap,Tc(rah 10-2) g.0 (sec) 8' (sec) Potential Capacity,cr ft W-3) ern— pcph cr,o—70 pcph Actual Capacity,c,,, .53 c,,,,—cr,x P,x Ps x p X P12 C.,o—cr,o X P�X PI X Ps X P, -?$x .�� x Id(e -Zx .'ID x :&x_I X A_(pcph) .21 X—j—X-s-4(pcph) SHARED-LANE CAPACPTY MQVOR STREET APPROACH blOVEMEM 7,8,,9 Mona ent V(pcph) 5.(pcph) cs„�) 4—csH — V LOS 7 13 5 .3 s 3 40 �= 8 0 - Z 13 !39 D 9 / Oa Or7 S3q A hG1N=S RWAPPltOACHib A1l U Movement van*) cl p ) ) 4=ciH — V LM — 3 4Ce 4 43 C 14Z i zq Z - 12 ffiwi� 3e 1 311 f3 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS L 4 Mo�eti .(pqh) S(per) cs—C= — V LOS 1 9 5-10 sn A 4 7Z o 444 E APPENDIX D PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY BY OOf'1St,�*v�"1Cwi leers- 8 S 3Sa sf5 g 3oLOE5 - SUBJECT: F,'vC cc9.r4e-"- Soo,-4 wi�DSo 2- _ EX��rli4� SHEET NO. f3 ,�- LAw E % X AoS�zTE� `T �/ownitb*a a - /.oo rr.3 Roves �gq. d - _� �n N� �, 75w �= - •� 1 S39 . � r.00 S�Co .1l�,.v� �Za R6u� 30 1�, - �r 234 0517 �.00 Z41 W i 3/0 9� J.vo 3 zo - ►_ n E,�;�� �. � IZ� 3 ze� 4o Z !ao 4 ,24 +� s� boo 84� _ _ M NJ 245 �rQc Z� 38S Z si Y. N x 4X.TIN )t- �, �� �-TLL . %TLT s SKt�w4no� SA3URMON FLOW ADJUMMENT WORKSHEET FLOC/ LANE GROM AD FACTORS O ® O O O O © OO ® ® ® Ad� ac Left w�. t„x � 1Ja a! Lmw Hm Grade . eus Area t T RFiav at Grow SOL LAnes Width vkh Movements Flow ! i i ! !ip-01* ITyr ! ! (pcp�'6p1) N ("phs) j -" 9-5 9-6 9.7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 18ao .93 98 to l•o I•o /.0 to ,zh 4z7 MOD 1 . 93 .9 b 1.0 /.0 /.0 1.d /.O /.O 1641 �s Soo / .93 .98 /.o /•D /a /•O .940 to 11061 ..�► o� I l•O .°1 I.v 1.0 to 1.0 '99 /.o 146 Z. ,°IS 1.0 I.o /.v /.a /.a ,9S i�2lr �..� (Soo 1.0 /r0 - swIDOO 11.05' .98 ).0 140 2.0 /.o ,8 .9 1-9 3 .�5 /.0 1.0 . /.0 1.0 to .9 1558 1.13 1,0 /.o 1.0 /.a 1.0 1 1100 .98 hD 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 l.00 .96 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.9b.3 1.0 1:�: 11-0. 18458z� .9� .98 1.o /, o 1.o 1,o pREpARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. cog-ml %cmx 1@et''S BY BY $s—3-SO I A �o +e$ -- SUBJECT': Fi V E C,o2�EgS � SovT� wi�DSv�.: 199 J P�� EK'��Ni4'L SHEET NO. Z,cf 3 1 . 3'UP APT SAT FLOW cRmc U-Ko P v •--}-- A as map P14 F,.aw Flow RaT1a �ws /C C . R , �n�t.•LCG�IOA v�= I.�Z .ZOO 49 1.Ilo$ t4 1� Z�lo A 3 r_ III 1v40.xC 2-0&40- 4 .* I- �,cw�afit-e- S .IZO 18471• Z4 /LQ-;Z?._._ . , ✓ .132, Z0 EeLAY-450 Z .413 IZ I 84 .148 Seaond 'metal Odalc iAS Ar Lane v/e Cmm Cde DeVj► Lane Lane Apim '- W � cop m Dn, US Csonp Ratio Ralf° L�sqth d, NWre- X S/C C (set/veh) Capadtr (eec/Veh) PF Delay LOS (qet/vdQ mme aeenb (set) a Table 9-13 (sec/veh) MiNe 94 ( ) X 9-1 Jqmfi!2A /`>c' ^ S18.(i2 F ,Z/ ZD 37,77 3�(0 /Z3.ov /,o o /!/D•77 r /Zo 3s,13 49 00,3+ /.0 v 13S. 1. 1 to 44.4(o 6W.S3 •.o Qvs,O FF 3 19• F •„ _ IZO - /.00 swe ,I ZO I LO 44651D 1841 _M&1r_9 A eo S3"s F 30.7 -- •�' I, ►!3 t ZO 143 zo 777.1& /.0 a 5Z.Z,9 F l ZO 1 � .00 339. F ,18 .4! I ZO 3D.BS' /0.7Z /.eo 137•S 7 F '�- ME Zo Z7f&6, a aG ;e 0 8Za.SL big ,Z8 ! iced 23 7 7�L�' /,eo .8S F 5�0.23 F LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET NAPPING FIVE CORNERS PM EXTERNAL ##--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** f# INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND }} ##--------------------------------------------------------------------------------f1 ** CYCLE LENGTH C # 120.00 * f f 120.00 ## *f EFFECTIVE GREEN g # 31.00 f f # 23.10 f# *# NUMBER OF LANES N * 1.00 * # # 1.00 #f *#TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) } 1136.00 } } * 397.00 }} f* MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(e) # 1023.00 # # # 397.00 ## *#LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) } 113.00 # # f 29.00 ff #f PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) * 1.00 f # f 0.07 *f f* OPPOSING LANES N(0) f 1.00 # } # 1.00 ff *f OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) * 380.00 f # # 455.00 #1 *f PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) * 0.00 # * # 0.00 ff f*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*1 f1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------f1 =� ## COMPUTATIONS # NORTHBOUND * SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUND # WESTBOUND ## *1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------#1 *# SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f 1800.00 f # # 1800.00 *1 *# FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) * 0.21 f * # 0.25 ff **p/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f 7.18 f * # -9.68 *1 *f LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f 0.64 f # * 0.59 f1 *# p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f 1.00 f * # 0.07 ## ** p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f 23.82 f # # 32.78 ## ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) # 0.00 # # * 0.93 *# #f INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) # 0.00 # * # 18.07 ## -:: *f TH EQUIVALENT E(L) # 1.76 f # # 1.90 *# #* LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) f 0.26 f * f 0.48 ## ** LT FACTOR f(LT) * 0.26 * # it 0.48 ## ##--------------------------------------------------------------------------------## F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 4f �. .A . PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. co tll"lg� BY BY 99 r�Na itil ED SxEET NO. -- SUBJECT: Fivs coiLHem4- sco -p+ of3 i, LAME - --_ Yowwt LA FLaw 110 :7 A 00 1 Roes 194 "'♦ .00 30 't' 00 1100 Ax 303 400 1 r t' . 9114 boo 8 4Co /.cv Z6�- Z -a,W.cu.Wo sT. "000 sue. «• SATURAMN FLOW ADJUSMENT WORKSHEET FLoV/ t.l►NE Gia0M AD EAiCInRS p m CD OO O O ® ea Ana > t®t I1di.Sac ideal Na of lame Heavy Caade Fk& Appc Sat LAnes Width `feh Tian Ti Rate}low f f f f f f i it, a Niw Taw Tame Tak ( ) --= 9-5 9-6 9a 9-6 9.9 9-W 9.11 9-12 !8� .93 9 /.o /.o /.o /.D to ,tb 4 Z-- 1 rlg '� /boa 1 .93 .9b 1.0 1.0 /.o /.G to , )3 .9b !.o !.o A0 40 MR /•0 IGo .�► oo = 1 I.0 .fib 1.0 1.0 1.0 !.o !.o two as k 1800 .9 .9b 1-0 1.0 /.a /.v /.o .9S l ?6 � MOO 1.0 !�0 1.0 1800 / 493 .93 1.0 !.o Udo lA I.o .9 I5�8 *� . -. E8 y bo !.o , — Tp- Woo 1 lica .98 .o I.o Ib I.O 1.)+? l.o 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 , 84 I.o 3(0 1. RSS&OWELL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY - �0 4/88 8S— 35a SuWp=. F;v 6 rot"ETS - So vr+� wh-J�sc�>� 199/ A M. _ c o�'IB i��D SHEETNO. PF�Q� fi�ec, -'X i� c- Z. t 3 1 . t 1 . • • 1 � 1 � i i : � ' 3.CA P j 1 Sq-f F1ovV - cl+A E v 1 } •--_-- LAN E APT C u p /C 1 ltoup F�..ow/ FL oW R4T►o L 210 .. �__ . .• -t b3o / v � �•83 -+ 3 1 ZZ(o �n�u.-tt•G�to�. �G. 4 i o Z58 .7110 . .•1 3-t-¢ 64} 1763 ✓ ow- t 38 1. l= 1:48�. .. .: . 4 3 ZS' l�v?10 _ I + loa — �. •— 1.831 k ' S 3 120Co ✓ 1�1 Z 1 - 1.83 1L•Q-;u.�_. t /.53b .7 - ✓ ,f Z4- s��sGcnoN 60 tZ 846 J 7Z3 .406 LoS Z � `-' 7bta1 lc L06 GoompPttd Seo M-ftrm DcIaT s•iw�[ O 0 ® O . 0 O O O O Lane v/e Gmm gde Ddry Lane Lane � � a, c.� � � � �r Wwe x a/c C (SKIveb) cam•&► (ow/veh) PF Daay LOS (stc/vieb) We ohs c TaWt 9-13 (sec/veh) MMe 94 ( X 0 94 11-0 v /v C2. o z�• .4 ZA 3&3 3 �44.73 /,o o /83.lXo t.Z44 . /zO 3 s,so 0 149,V& AO v _ 4 t.8 Izo 4s L,�9 r io /. ..o �0`1 o we 1.8 .11 I LD •FS/ZS /037.s4 A00 a 33 � GIBZ•83 I.83�- , IZO 4S.Z9 l 4 oL4 oZ /.00 G� Z - .00 4ZI.71 k 140 IZO 3/,&0 00 IM-3, si.98 F IZo z'#9 ./I .oa wg I.bZ9 r .�e.sa ONO .eo. LEFT TURN ADJUSTMEKT FACTOR YORKSHEET YAPPING FIVE CORNERS �- PM COMBINED tt----------------------------------------------------------------------- }} INPUT VARIABLES * NORTHBOUND f SORTHBOUND * EASTBOUND * MESTBOUND tt }t--------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------tf f* CYCLE LENGTH C * 120.00 * * f 120.00 ft tt EFFECTIVE GREEN 9 t 30.54 t t f 22.06 ft ff NUMBER OF LANES N f 1.00 { f f 1.00 f* **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f 1156.00 { f t 397.00 tt t* MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f 1043.00 f * f 397.00 ft ff`CCT TURN FLOW RATE vILT) f ::3.0y * f t 29.00 f* r y tt PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f 1.00 f f * 0.07t ft OPPOSING LANES N(0) * 1.00 * * f 1.00 *t tt OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f 374.00 f f * 455.00 ft f* PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) t 0.00 * * f 0.00 tt tt------- ------------------------------------- - --------tt tt------ -------------------------------------���__�___���--------t* �- tt COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND t SOUTHBOUNB * EASTBON(D t VESTBOUND tt ���------------ -------------------- _______ ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) * 1900.00 t t t 1800.00 tt ' ff FLOM RATIO, OPP Y(o) t 0.21 t t - t 0.25 tt tfp/o SRN NOT BLOCKED 9(u) * 7.08 * f f -11.07 tt tt LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f 0.64 f f. t 0.59 # f* p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) t 1.00 t * f 0.07 ff of p/o GRN BLOCKED 9(q) * 23.46 f f t 33.13 f* ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) * 0.00 * t * 0.93 ff tt INITIAL p/o 6RN 9(f) * 0.00 t t t 18.16 f* �. f* TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f 1.75 f t f I'" t* tt LT FACTOR, SHARED f(a) t 0.26 * t t 0.45 ff of LT FACTOR f(LT) f 0.26 t f f 0.45 f* tt--------- ----------------------- ---�:� ----------tt F tc 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 ' SHEET 3 OF 3 r r PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. FUSS&CrN. �-�- BY b gg — 3 5 c /99 gx,WVOL. SHEET NO. fz jA S uE 1 . 1 1 � •T.�•�wwo� � � � . . � - ..; 3• L,gN E SSE APT SAT. Fi owS U/C /C A irs t.nM/ FLOW P►► K Roup F Z IZZ /may •� 76 ,6�0 to • : . _ :- � . . W �Z = _ .,low Z Zoo 1� - T��S6GTION DECAY= fir= Ddq UX ph* WAY 0 o f O ® ® O O O 0 OD L.®m Law APR sac+ Un, /c Caem Cede Delay i.ane Delay pro m+ Cdoup Cdow Ddq US Gww r d, GroupL�06 (sec/� •� Motie Ratio Ratio L C (w/�� Cap.dty (W/�) PF- 3 � 'LLbic94 (�) c Table 9 i ( / X 9-1 aw I r3 GGS 90 .Gq I l 0• Agc> 71(e/ o Q8 to D .00 4.05 A I,� T3 NS • ► G`S 9 -�•• h► .G sz .o 90 Z�l•8I �� .�2 ��Gd 33 B E� G o 30-1& 1 Z /•oo 37,G7 D 3S.o 49 0 90 Z9, 4 44- '� 1� LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVE AT SAND HILL RD. PM EXTERNAL tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt INPUT VARIABLES t NORTHBOUND t SOUTHBOUND t EASTBOUND t WESTBOUND tt tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt CYCLE LENGTH C } t 90.00 t t tt tt EFFECTIVE GREEN g t t 61.40 t t tt tt NUMBER OF LANES N t t 1.00 t t tt t*TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) t t 893.00 t t tt tt MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) t t 663.00 t t tt t#LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) t t 230.00 t t tt tt PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) t t 1.00 t t tt tt OPPOSING LANES N(0) t t 2.00 t t tt tt OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) t t 891.00 t t tt tt PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) t t 0.00 t t tt tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt COMPUTATIONS t NORTHBOUND t SOUTHBOUND t EASTBOUND t WESTBOUND tt tt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt tt SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) t t 3600.00 t t tt tt FLON RATIO, OPP Y(o) t t 0.25 t t tt ttp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) t t 51.99 t t tt tt LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) t t 0.32 t t tt tt p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) t t 1.00 t t tt tt p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) t t 9.41 t t tt tt p/o TH IN SHARE LN PIT) t t 0.00 t t tt tt INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) t t 0.00 t t tt tt TH EQUIVALENT E(L) t t 3.54 t t tt tt LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) t t 0.30 t t tt tt LT FACTOR f(LT) t t 0.30 t t tt F 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 -350 SHEET 3 OF 3 H� r y�S'1i "I rJ Py r .PARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. _ �L.�: BY - gS-350 /9 9/ CAN&dtz SHEET NO. -- SuB1ECT: �oc�7'E /9 y S�vo,�ic� .�d4D - � 2— ?ki9FF« j f 3 '�acffrlFN /'�-1�+ E LAME _; x Aos�sTED VA F u i F 7 � _ 0� �z �y 9 � floe— G S /,C d / l 2 S�. X N X ' y� .• >L�� �} Y-tw >Lfd- A-4sx Y.Rr s�.�+»d.• -SATU AnON mow ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEEr FL LANE Ci000PS AD FACInRS � CD OD 0 p ® 4/. ��.5.� Ft® mw Na d lint tbw Grade Pk& bus Area RiRow Sat Lanes yam, TiRate How f f i Y ia N tvpbt) 9.6 97 9-6 9-9 9-W 9-o .00 /•00 /00 .00 / /Tca / /.off g' /.00 l.o� /o /cY� .S /.00 /boy . 1. /too /•00 /,� /.c►a /.c,c� /.e+0 /oo -24 Zoo 11-00 .00 1/.Oc% /cx� /caa 00 �.oo A 00 <yr PREPARED DATE CHECICED DATE PROJECT NO. FIJSS& _' .7 oona.#ting er�nee�'s BY 85 — 350 19;I C.&WSINM SHEETNO. . SUBJECT:�ouTL /9 yr�lD/yiLc— A -' M z,of 3 i v s ' LANE - V } =--r- - LANE APT. SAT FLo Fi ows C G'�' p /C •� A�aa d4fRap F,.aw FLOW RATIO . ..... _�; .• S 4SS Z I Z. QD /ram ✓ .l03 s- �Z . ... .. k. Z. u& 4q¢ .4s.? 3�4 TERSEGTDAI y o4 .o e ,4�} De-LAY-0 Z I- S - G Semd Delff 1 1cLOS !•�+s` Pleat arm op to�tw[ O ® ® O O O O ® ® ® . AFpL Lne v/c Gam Cyck Ddsr L w � � Law I�e+e Dew L05 GMW VAdo Rao Leith d, Gcow � F p a � (se%eW 'Lii61e More- X a/C C (�/�) C&�r (ow/ ) Table 9-13 (sec/v+eh) TAle 94 ornrb (�) c X 91 r, #IA.I ) `/o l d .00 �i (3 - &B I 9c, 4,00 134Z A O to 1, LTZO ,I Zfo 90 Z8.7 3 Z 1 I ,G o i•av 3(G•33 9.35 13 .b3 90 S•3F3 314 S,31 .00 .e o �33 13 /r,3Z /•oo /�G 37,33 Z9.G4 /.84 L LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVE. AT SAND HILL RD. 1991 PM PEAK - COMBINED ff---------------------- -----------------------------------------------ff ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff----- ------------------------ -----------------------------------ff ff CYCLE LENGTH C f f 90.00 f f ff ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f f 62.00 f f ff ff NUMBER OF LANES N f f 1.00 f } ff HTOTAL A". FLOW RATE v(a) f f 985.00 } f ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f f 759.00 HLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f 226.00 f f ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f 1.00 f f ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f 2.00 f f - ff ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f 930.00 f f ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTD) f f 0.00 f f ff ff----------- ---------------------- ------------------------------ -ff ff--------- ----------------------------ff ' ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f MESTBOUND #f ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f 3600.00 f f ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f 0.26 f f ff ffp/o 6RN NOT BLOCKED ' B(u) f f 52.25 f f ff —� ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f 0.29 f f ff ff p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f 1.00 f = f ff ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f f 9.75 f f ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f 0.00 f f ff ff INITIAL p/o 6RN Q(f) f f 0.00 f } ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f 3.83 f f ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(a) f f 0.28 f f ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f 0.28 f f ff ff----------- ---- ------- ----ff F 6 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85-350 SHEET 3 OF 3 �� t arc PREPARED DATE CHECKED LjDAdTEPROJECT NO. 2 ut '�ccx s Bf l�lrle@f S BY BY - 85 -3Sa suBJEcr: Rocs-re: Pv E _ 9 _ SHEETNO. i LAME � r; X -L Ans�sTED r_ Vomit 16 q70 A C)c> /Ox � ME Fto� 1` 7G 4 /.0 80 4 970 �. •Z z 3 �s 3�7 Zo0 9 /96-�' 377—> e/ t 47 764 / I "tl r C 2. S. Y. X '�v1 X.T M� �- �� ��� YLAA. ��0. �TLT Y-Tr LT s�r�a+no•• SATURAnON FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET F�ow LANE GROUPS AD FAMRS O O O O O O ® ® ® Ad'.Sat Apppr. Lane Ideal Na of Lane He Grade Pkg. B rea us A Right L.elt Gmw Saow t. Lanes Width N f7 �f Type Turn + Rate Mw4cmems Fl t ( ( t ! f a N a (rphg) 9-S 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 "5 boa /.00 /.00 /.QO I-oo I Zoo /,do /,co A00 /.cam /.00 .,M /o0 114b 1 I RJSS&aNELL- PREPARED DATE DATE PROJECT NO. 7 oonsuiti 'veers ..BY BY �5 SUBJECT: ck, �,¢� - 9 9 �k��-►� - SHEET NO. r� /yy ,E,C E u — j,ot3 Ste•r.*.� �a ,�' Milk- .- t r •- f f f 3•CAP. t.AN E ADT SAT. FLOW CRrnc#- cj ME _ •- -- yRo P f •• T - „ tA �s� oup PN�s Fi-oV FLOW Rgno Flows C / , c. t `r1 ✓ ,o =- �� zI f/4 , � .., � . /�Z /76P Y OCo . 3 g 7 11&6 ,zzS ✓ . zZ3 3 .o �:IIFMTIO Z3.5S 1 G 4.ta~« - Pts+it'B:rat Seooe�d'krm �l is L06 Lane w/c Green Cyde Delay Lane Lme AFFL Gimf Rado Ratio I�eh d, GmW Delay r GmW Cw*W Delay LOS More- X 6/c c (sec/� Capadty (sec/veh) PF Delay LOS (set/veb) TAIe (�) IC Table 9-13 (sec/veh) Table 94 X 9.1 0 90 4 /210b p .a � N _ - 9d - - - - - /O,z2 B s ; 9-P 1430 Iol& ZI- 71 ,do 3G.o, 'D 3&.01 .39+ 37r SS /.00 u RMSMrNMLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. cxx MA "Q el�g' o eery BY BY _ SURIBCT: �r,E ,qy �.� _ 1951 PM _ ComaideD SHEETNO. S�ria.N �A u�G. , 2 fz _f •ram 1 .. • -� *. {. ..• - . ;. • • - • • a LAN E APT SAT. FLAVV F1� C M.,,A /Ccow UnD Ft�w/ F 94,o44 Z -1z /7G .�4-1 • . ? t 3 Z IZ s4 /ll9 .�Z i ��" .JS I �= 406 /1SD -0-3 .19& 1 i o DELAY=&7.D Los = F 13t+at'�raa Seoaid�cm Tlal is L06 e f�s•cwft OFI ® O . O O w/c Gam CI& Delq Lane Delay Psopme"m L w LiewpR Ratio RatioLath de Caaw d= Te CP CAP Dy Lr S x of C C - (sec/ d) C�ty (ow/ d PF Oda► LA6 (K/ h) Table(sec) IC Table 9-U (sec/veh) MMe 9-L X 91 .b6Z . `fib r l IZ. .Q 7-7.97 D N$ _ _ 9d _ - o SS 1.18 .(M 90 .9 io 1DZ-73 Ado lZP,70 (4qs3 F MFG FUSSUMBLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT P .7 OOnS�er4neers BY BY 3 Sv e-s_ SUBJECT: SuLii�l.4 til A�l�. �1 fZ�fA SfbPo 1 g 9 C'kT��oI hL SHEET NC ! f M �4i� -T�AF1ciCi j of 3 �• -- --�� - ---'--r— J—._ T D '� TAD ,---+---•— - - - d - Syr i i -�• �` ! - ----- -- lot ----- - i 2MA-TA 4it Z4 t ; TOO 3L9 io' io sSS , � - 50LL4 vA+.4 1 SATURMON FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEE I Flow LANE GROUPS AD FACTORS 0 ® © O OO O O OO OO ® ® ® Ad* SaL _ Appr. Lane Ideal Na of Lane Heavy Grade Pkg. Bus Area Right Left �, Flew Width 1kh f f f 6R Type f"rn EU' Rate f a ) N uble T&bje Tsble TableTable Table Table Table (vPh8) 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 18�00 .93 .98 1.0 .o l.o !.C /.o •i9 3/0 loco I 193 89 e) /.o /,a /.0 11 0 1.0 /.0 1(140 --3 0 -0 9 1.o /-o /,o I.o /.o I ,81, 51-7 bo .9e) 10 I.0 /.o 110 /,o /5i7 iaoo1 L03 s" Lo bo • !.0 ).a .q l 1.0 /GS'3 A FLISS&CYNERL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROIECr NO. '7 oonsx�i&g pq e w _8e-s BY az�— 3 So • rctieMA-r�4 SHbppi� q g F—x�Ni4` sHEM NO. sue�ECT: suc.ca v�-r�! AVC, PM '-ARF77L z, f 3 LH i 1 ,,.. 3.CAP• LANE ADT. SAT. FVv vV c�mc A N E Uc �/�11A5 �owS /C 1Zour Fl.,cv� FLOW RAT1a .. _� Oe 7-h'"`' el" -1 es .31z . ZZG .& 3 S89 -mmkivil VAC 1640 . 3S`� •.693 1I3 .Sl8 • _ � i ..: . . 4 > 7 .094 , Z06 3 a44q ..-� o �- -S-i" z �lL /,s�� •/G Z ✓ . � 3/(o . 776 '��9 Z Z8 16.63 ' Off/ •Lot 34 L LL DELAY= 1740 rjA ; 4.ld+t Hm somm !Dda I"Dda&j ® 10 0 _ M 4D Q 4) 6) ® ® ® e Lane •/t Ctneen q& Dday Lane Dday Pm6ees kn Lane Lane APR buve- X a/C C (secIN&) Capa&y (aec/veh) PF Ddap L06 (set/vdi) I" now c T"9-13 (set/veh) MMe r X 94 ♦'j ,b 3 90 Z I L 0• •D •.s18 .(0 90 it37 0,3s l.0 S138 - s8 4 • 77q 43 9d 700 11-7q Z.z t ho 94 a q. *,, r W 90 Z:5,& 0.71 !•o ?4, 7 C, 90 7,14 33,.S 3 ZZ,37 344 t O 4 to 00• I s 90 ZZ•48 g 0•i2 l.o ZZ-00 G ZZ.q G r RMSMYNERLPREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. � oor Idm et' n By Bjr—3Sa SUBJECT: i4y2M A-r�4 ShbPP149* i941 C.'oM SHEET NO. PEAK, Tz4frlG 2. f 3 _ .4 it 3.CAP. LANE AD?' SAT. Fio vV CAR1cA�- y-Zo P V :_ f } 'T" asa R p�As Few FLOW RAT10 Flows �C �c ' 1F+-hAu 1 Sb 8, 423 io 7 .3�Co = -- • • 't 9 2 - ► I /Z3S !o .to/03 1/ .?Z3 J34b 1!o /.� .. .: . Z 6F S3 . 041 .Z3 Z �5 .177 /& . 30 Z - ' ' DELAY= 17.33 cos = G -- Mot Thrm sT IcLos s.wMt O ® O . O O O O O ® ® 0. . Imw v/c Cmw Oyde Dday lane Ddap Pmpmkm Iam Lane Appc Rado Rado tog& d, GwW d2 Fackw GcoP CAP Deby L S lrb" X a/C C (owl"&) Capedtr (sw/veh) PF Dday L S (ow/`eh) M"e aae�b c Table 9-13 (tec/veh) W* 91 ( ) X 94 -♦j 90 5.9 8ri/B(o /O •ss .78 90 4. 3� A 43 4, 7f a8 Q sB 4-& .9/& , z3 90 7.77 7•Z4 /10 (3 .SU •i 90 ZS-SZ Z7Z /14 /.o LG 90 Z7,&¢ �� 3,�fR 1.1z 4Z•z� 90 Z4,47 /!® o..�� l.0 2�•93 G L4f�7 G LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVENUE & ARMATA'S DRIVEWAY -`� PM COMBINED }*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------f* ff INPUT VARIABLES * NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND �# **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ff CYCLE LENGTH C f 90.00 * 90.00 f 90.00 * 90.00 ff ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f 67.50 f 67.50 f 13.50 f 13.50 ff ** NUMBER OF LANES N f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f* **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f 737.00 f 1235.00 f 388.00 f 103.00 ** *f MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(a) * 654.00 * 1199.00 * 246.00 * 6B.00 ** **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f 83.00 f 36.00 f 142.00 f 35.00 ff ** PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) * 1.00 f 0.03 * 1.00 f 1.00 ff f* OPPOSING LANES N(0) f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f 1.00 f* ** OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) * 1199.00 * 654.00 f 6B.00 f 246.00 ** ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f 0.03 f 0.00 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ** COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ** SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f 1729.15 * 1800.00 * 1800.00 f 1800.00 ** ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f 0.69 * 0.36 * 0.04 f 0.14 ff ffp/o 6RN NOT BLOCKED g(u) * 16.61 f 54.66 * 10.50 * 1.39 ff ** LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f 0.13 f 0.47 * 0.83 f 0.72 ** *f p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) * 1.00 f 0.03 f 1.00 f 1.00 f* ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f 50.89 f 12.84 f 3.00 f 12.11 ff *f p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f 0.00 f 0.97 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff *f INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f 0.00 f 11.53 f 0.00 f 0.00 ff ** TH EQUIVALENT E(L) * 8.96 f 2.41 f 1.35 f 1.56 ff ** LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) f 0.09 f 0.98 f 0.87 f 0.36 f* ** LT FACTOR f(LT) f 0.09 * 0.98 f 0.87 f 0.36 f* *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 FUSSUMBLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT r . pp�� � i�5 BY BY s7� a�� 88 SS-3Sa SUBJECT: QOO s CO uu V A 1► AVE. SHEET NO Tree,G j 01.3 • - �v; M V6w�E U% M£ p -- I F' -T- II • ' 1 Ott d -- -•i9pe-- = - ' ---- -17 t & 20 ,90 1, oa - ---- — D-/�I}�- - - - 1 �— rls - -- _ 4 SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT tiWORKSHEF Rt.ow LANE GROUPS ADIUSTMENT FACTORS O :O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 ,teeV c AM- Lane Ideal No►of Lane Heavy Grade Pkg. Bus 7Area Right Left Gr b Flow Lanes Wifdth f f f f f6 f� Rate Movemerl • N a able Table Table a (vphg) 9-5 9-6 9 7 1 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 oo I.o 19e .o /.0 1 1.0 /.0 /,0 ,9! �� 3 /2)00 Z11-0.s .95 1.0 1.0 1.0 /•o 4 /,0 3s�s r T 1.0 9 /-0 10 1.0 /.0 /.0 . 1&00 Z 1.0 .0 lD.O 1. . .O 1 a 1 3S� J 0 1 0 190 /10 1.0 /.0 /. o /,o .7b r es 70 8-.+ ,9ft) 1.6 /.0 1.0 1.0 to Sr +- iboa I IA3 , 98 to l• 1.0 1.v ,SS` 10 /39 ws ',r 1 Soo i w .98 i.0 1.0 1#0 /.O .81 142- LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVENUE & ROUTE 5 PM EXTERNAL ff--------------------------------------------------------- ff----------------------- ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND } ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff r- ff CYCLE LENGTH C f } 120.00 f 120.00 ff } EFFECTIVE GREEN g } f 15.10 f 15.10 ff ff NUMBER OF LANES N } } f 1.00 f 1.00 ff }}TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE Y(a) } f 109.00 f 223.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(a) f f f 80.00 f 61.00 {} HLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f } 29.00 f 162.00 ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) { { 1.00 f 0.73 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 61.00 f 80.00 ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f f f 0.73 } 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f f 1422.41 f 1800.00 ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f f 0.04 f 0.04 ff �-- ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f 10.40 f 10.22 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f 0.84 f 0.83 ff ff p/a LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f 1.00 f 0.73 ff ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f f f 4.70 f 4.88 ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f f 0.00 f 0.27 ff ff INITIAL p/o SRN g(f) f f f 0.00 f 0.71 ft ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f f 1.34 f 1.36 ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) f f f 0.78 f 0.81 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.78 f 0.81 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 I arc WEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT N 2 . OoroAthg er-4neers BY BY I/88 i SUBJECT: R�0TW 5 E C0 c..v v 14 4 Ave-. '9 91 �• SHEET NO ed a iAk-F Of 3 Vo M E i F,tioko -17 14. - -- - - - -- -moo 38 1 890 L oo 4 , Al1 .00 - Is'4 1.vo -- o ;-- - ..-�- --_- m �a 1. 00 .s - - - - - - - - - : - ---- -�►- , r` r n JL , SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Plow LANE GROUPS ADIUSTMENT FACTORS (D OO ® O Os O O © .O ® 0 0 Ad®at. AM Line Ideal No►of Lane Heavy Grade Pkg. Bus 'Arm Right Left Movementscroup S&L Vases Widthf f f f f� Tkim Rat a (P�PhgPl) N a a aTable (vPhB) 9-5 9-6 9-79-8 9-9 9-10 9.11 9-12 oa 1.0 m o .o l.0 1,0 /•0 /.o ►7?3 491 t /2)0a Z11-0.5- .98 /.o /.0 1.0 /.o .%9 /,0 a5 �- Ito q bo /.0 1.0 /-o !.� 16-0 s8 +� /boo z !,o 9 pi 10 I.0 /.o to l•0 , .90 /to 1.0 to t o l.0 � 1435 low .8-+ 190 1.6 /•0 1.O 1•O ,ft l'ou-s-191 �— I boo .13 4 9 !. 1--o I•C) .8� I o iM79 w8 "� 1600Al1.0 098 10 I.o 1,0 /.o , bl CHECKED DATE _.._ PREPARED DATE PROJECT NO. y 00 6Y1'16�@�'S BY BY �o s 95"'—35a � A�E' • 1 99/ P. SHEET No- -- SVSIFtT: ROvrE S IF v t.L•'�v A Cp i�ED TIPq 'L z. f ± _ i 1 , - •- - t - ♦ ♦ - LAN E ADT SA FLov�/ me N E V RouPUp FLaW FLOW RA110 meows /C �C _--_ I t • I q3 ,o4341 t to* lv 1410 � Act •� . 3�3 I 1tc��o�Yoe -4• ` 0< ./ 3 ,I to� v . � �,G� �rs�tcTwN ' — DELAY16 S,S4S �.lfbrs� west�e Sec+oe�d�m 'i�hl is LOB O O O ® 8 Lane w/e Gee Of& Delay Lane Delay Prope *m Lane Lane Appe: RMb It * targth d, Group d, Fictw Group Grasp Delay US MR- X I/C C - (sec/veh) Capadty (sec/veh) PF Delay LOS (sec/V&) MMt saam (sec) a Tabk 9-13 (sec/veh) MMe 94 ",Xe 94 4) oG a 90 4l,o4r.3� ►1l3 1 l.o�(o . IZD z9.4-5 13 n 4z,7(o ,90 (iS.•44- GS.34 .off IZo 52,33 iersz .ram Izo 6.Z/ 3.7G A SI,&Z t -�` /91 .► IZo 33.34 1 92- 0,a3 ro 33.37 P Izo 34,307 Z35 0.3 S to 34,7z C> /318/ 7i8 Z./S 1.0 S9lo G 39,08 ul 73.sa .0 liz, F 4G•98 E LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIVAN AVENUE & ROUTE 5 PM COMBINED f*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ** INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND * SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND } **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ** CYCLE LENGTH C f } 120.00 * 120.00 � }� EFFECTIVE GREEN g * } 15.90 * 15.90 �# ** NUMBER OF LANES N * * } 1.00 * 1.00 ** **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) * * * 109.00 * 238.00 ** H MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(a) * * * 80.00 * 61.00 f* **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) * * * 29.00 * 177.00 ** ** PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) * * * 1.00 * 0.74 ** -- ** OPPOSING LANES N(0) * * * 1.00 * 1.00 ** ** OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) * * * 61.00 * 80.00 ** ** PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) * * * 0.74 { 0.00 ** ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ** COMPUTATIONS * NORTHBOUND * SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND ** i **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ** SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) * * * 1418.34 * 1800.00 ** ** FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) * * * 0.04 * 0.04 ** -- **p/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) * * * 11.22 * 11.06 ** ** LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) * * * 0.84 * 0.83 ** ** p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) * * * 1.00 * 0.74 ** ** p/a GRN BLOCKED g(q) * * * 4.68 * 4.84 ** ** p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) * * * 0.00 * 0.26 ** ** INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) * * * 0.00 * 0.68 ** ** TH EQUIVALENT E(L) * * * 1.34 * 1.36 ** ** LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) * * * 0.78 * 0.81 ** ** LT FACTOR f(LT) * * * 0.78 * 0.81 ** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 .,d w FUSS&O NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT N( • consulting engineers BY BY SUBJECT: 2c Ln-Mr 5 E 1 0 4-v%(A,•1 AVC- �9 9� P. M _ SHEET NO. co 6"D T-eA rr-,G 1 of 3 Vowhlc L� ME Q ; F .ol� Z 3"� 190 1.©O,- t ; 43Z ,90 1,00 1 s84- .90 4,66 9 - ,- y z 381 --- -� - - , --- ---� f o-1 F to s1 4S4 °ao 1. 60 so 4 � Rom s ----;- .90 2. 1 )4x-r1,-R-r S ON FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSH . FLOW LANE CROUPS ADFUSTMENT FACTORS 0 OO ® 0 Os OO 0 OO OO 0 0 0 Adje t. AM. Lime Ideal No,of Lane Heavy Grade Pk& Bus Area Right Left }low Group Sat Lanes Width %*h Turn Turn Rate Movements Flow f E E E E f f f a ) N a a a aTable- (vphg) 9-5 9-6 9-7 9-8 9-9 9.10 1 9-11 9-12 as 1.0 ,9$ */-0 /.o 1.0 1793 qS t�` /2)oo Z 1.03 .9� l-O 1.D 1.0 /.0 1.D /-O (sl loco i 1.07- ,98 /.0 10 l.O 1.0 . 8 /•O /&04- 1 1.0 9 /.o to 1.v 0 ,G /&oo Z !,o 10 /.o 1.0 to , J /600 150 .98 .0 10 /•o lea. T-1- 1800 .S-:� .90 1.0 /.D 1.0 1.0 '990 to '�-- I boa 1 .93 , C)8 1.0 1•0l.0 1.CU ,S� /.O i39 w8 t o0 1 1.0 698 /.o 1.0 1.0 1.0 /.D o I _ FLISSBdYMML PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. ConsLI tV Bfl 0 BY - BY SS'�3Sa �/�e 8 SUBJECT: Rom 5 S v c..0-V A� AJ c:7 . i99/ P'M. - SHEET NO. Goti1 B irl E.b •T7eE} 'L 2. t 3 PNAS _ . - � rtJ-- • ; Cry 'I"Pr* - � - • - . - . ~ : - 3.uP, t.ANE AAA: SAT. Ftov�/ Rc)lo q/O6 .oupPa F�� Fe.ow Ro meows C f ......•_ I t 3o 3651 . 31 z— Itty& iklool(O 48o 1604 r Z9 ✓ 3it 4-TT ' ' . _ i i .•. , . S Coo /e ✓ Z b =.Ss - �� Z 423 �� ,t2 .l0&2 3U t 3 — . �sscnoK T 3 1411 10 4 De-L.AY c �oI t S = D rkd BratDdw Smabd 7ksat 'lbtalD&y&tA6 •OF SdOW 4 m 0 O _ O O O O O ® 0 ® _ tine % Cliee+ 4& oesap Lane oday hopession Lane Lane ppmch wPPL RiMo Wo Lm%& d, GA=w 42 I%rim Gc=W Geow Dday L S Irtae• X 6/C C (see/Meh) Cape ty (.«/"&) PF Odsy tA6 (mac/ 'a6Je saenb (sect c Table9-13 (sec/veh) MMe !-1 "XiM 94 4) .oho- 41,29MIG 0.00 M.w _ �18 f t . Ott 0 29.13 C3• L 8 Z�►1D D 34,4Z r'' .310 0 3o, 4 2-3.sD 48,sa E f 18 Z .(do 1 Z40 S9Z ZL 0,00 4.Z 29.37,db r134 ,1 Izo 31-78 v*4 o&Z 31.8o I W. ,20 10 3Z.6)& D 324 1,210 a." 184wiiiii, 1.11 1.0 (3,90 6 "1 %41 311•53 ,80 .a 74t 1 F 3Z, D 4' .its t LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET SULLIYAN AYE & ROUTE 5 PM COMBINED �- ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ** *t--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff *f CYCLE LENGTH C * f f 120.00 * 120.00 ff f* EFFECTIVE GREEN g f f t 10.70 f 10.70 *f ff NUMBER OF LANES N f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE via) * f f 109.00 f 238.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f f # 80.00 , * 61.00 f* **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f f 29.00 * 177.00 ff ** PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f f 1.00 f 0.74 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff *f OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 61.00 * 80.00 ** f* PROP LT IN OPP YOL P(LTO) t f * 0.74 f 0.00 ** *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ft f*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND *f f*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff f* SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) * f f 1416.71 * 1800.00 ** ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) * * * 0.04 * 0.04 ** _- ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED' g(u) * * * 5.78 f 5.62 *f ** LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) * * * 0.84 f 0.83 ff ** p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) * * * 1.00 f 0.74 *f ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f f * 4.92 f 5.08 ff ** p/a TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f f 0.00 f 0.26 ff tf INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f f f 0.00 f 0.67 ** ** TH EQUIYALENT E(L) f f f 1.34 f 1.36 ** tf LT FACTOR, SHARED f(s) f f f 0.78 f 0.80 ff ** LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.78 * 0.80 ** *t--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 W. SHEET 3 OF 3 .ram f icy 9e T �" PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. Oc�N� BY BY sneers �V�jo /0.3. 9 q I PM SHEET NO. SUBJECT: �"�-� .mooE�c.E ��a. '_ f}L Ti�AFHG / of Eiiv Tb N 1—� �X� f WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSES OF T4TEKSEC-MNS t�URLY VOLuMFS VOLUMES IN PCPH .._ Rs uTE 30 Major sbver.�.....�re•� �. N _vs— e o48 N s Q - -- Vs L!8 5-34 V2_—� V• — L�8 Grade 534 — V2 V� V3 Q% 34 — Vs N E] VV V7 V• 1 i Date of Counts: 3 ? 0Tvwfleriod-.- .KAWAI-- -P-4--r oA-1- l rNo=F67 D Z2 9s -- AvaW Running Speed:• 9a Minor - Sb eL PHF: Grade ..—`16 VOLUME ADPJMMENTS 7 9 Mo�neasent Na 2 3 4E,�e 534 34 Z07 ZO 8� volume(vph) , %U(pcph�see Table101 Z28 z2 95 ' ST from EP k RT Minor Street V' ! s it +�=s S S �(V i sir► Flow,VC 1/2 V3+V2 _1_ .--� c+) � T�s s9 sec(Table 10-2)cp, S Z (Fig.10-3) Critical Gap.?c,and Potential Capacity,cp. _ _=P=ph ! Actual Capacity,C. c'°'' c°' r .-. Street t Vs STEP I a From Wjor Ca aa sr FlpiW,V V3+V2= GZ+ "-�'�Vph(Va) _ pit(Fig.10-3) Critical Gap,Tc,and PotentW Capacity,,cp TC sec(Table 10-2)cH Pleroettit of Utilized and Impedance Factor(Fig- c' cw.s _�vpcph f Actual Capacty,CM V f STEP 3:LT From Minor Street l 2 V +V=+Vs+V.s J.2+534, 100+�s vph(V,,) Flow,V. / s �jpcph(Fig. 10-3) Critical Gap,Tc,and Potential Capacity,cp TC_ sec(Table 10-2)cP, Actual Capacity,c„ "— CW7 s cr7 X P4_�X—='`pcph _ SHARED-LANE CAPACITY SH s v'+v, if lane is shared (v7/c,,7)+(v/C-0) LJDS Moveaw t Na v( ) Cuj(pcp h) c F 7 Z Z �� 3�• � 5 z3 1� 28 9 9 s 0 3o A 4 �z8 G3 PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. NEILL BY BY e nglt lE rs !01 ql — SHEET NO. of/ SUBJECT: iPe.OrE Re va. // C.� ��• — 6w6/A/ED Ti��iFF-ice / WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSES OF T-IN'rERSE�T�NS HOURLY ViOWMEs VOLUMES IN PCPH ;Q,uTE Xa -- Maim Street F.u.,.., ra•j �. N VD-is md*.—Vs 6-34 — N=Q V V`z�8 V3 C,cade 34 _ V2 0 — 2 rr N= —� V V, V,V, o'szOP —— Date of CountsK 1 a—7 O YIELD LZ Time mood — zo a��:10_� N=� _ tVlino Street: _ wa:__Grade__.0__96 E E VOLUME ADjU 2 3 4 5 � 9 S34 34 2i8 /098 �o /Z 7 volume(vph) Z¢o Z2 i�o Vol.(pcph) see Table 101 Vs STEP k RT from Mira Street I r� SM = SSI s�+► Flow,V� T = sec( 10-2)cp,� SZ-pcph ft 10-3) Critiml Gap,T,,and Potential Capacit ,cr ` � c CPO z?mph Actual CapsdtY,Cm V, ` STEP 2:LT From Mafia Stint V . Flow,V` 3+V2 (V(V.))Critical Gap,Tc,and poten ial Capacity,cp TC_��sec(Table 10-2)c� pcPh(Fig.10-3) � P�eroerrt of cP Utilized and Impedan ce Factor(Fig. 10-5) (w./C,.)X 100= 4$P,_• O .. _ pcph Actual Capacity,cm i -- 7 v, STEP 3:IT From b6nor Sbee Comfikting Flow,V� i/2 v,+v2+v,+v,= i 7+ 534+�8+L s �(V,7) — T ��L sec(Table 10-2)cP,s PcPt'(F'g• 10-3) Critical Gap.Tc,and potential Capacity,cp C = s_X�_�PcPh . Actual Capacity,� c�� CP'x P` SHARED-LANE CAPACrrY V.?+v9 if lane is shared Sys (v-?/cm7)+(v,/cm,) LOS b4ovement Na v( ) E — —c,(pcPN 3 0 30 6 9 G. 5Z9 s29 3 Z (.D Z� PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT N+ BY BY rioDFUSS-MM. �G�1►-lE�Y READ•f 9 q I •M• SHEET NO. SUBJECT: Sw.ta V AV-4 AVC• wORKSmm roR FouB-LBc INIL m iSEcriONS HOURLY VOLUMES Glade-D-96 STOP � & ° -2 N-[D N - O v�:v��vw V6�r - - �.__vs N N V`�- Grade Qx Grade Qx ny road v= �—V'—� s7 N-Q i,vs v. YIELD O �nor �71T Date of a i3 M, ppA mi road Tune I---d: IL r i-ave.10NIC Average I mft PHF: Grade x NX* ME ADJUSMEMS Ubvmmt Na 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ]0 11 12 %bL(Pghl see TAle V-1 1 D D O 8 )3 - v n�I i�x (3 P 8 ji I L NA V12 vn vw v. NA vs NA v' vi NA v3 VT v& v9 0 � i V1= STF?u Rr From Minor Serest v kCol�h+6 Fbw.%v 1/2 v,+V:-V,, 1/22 Vs+V$-Vct: vph Critical Gape,T,(TabL 10-2) �(sec) _ pbeartW Gam►•cr,(FI&V-3) clo-- 0 PcPh 4u-- -Pcph pacwA of S uti=a (vo/c,.)x 10o—_fix (V,3/4,3)X V0 ta�pedana 16chm P ft10-5) Ps- I— Pr:-—L.L ._._ M+ial Cipadt�c. 4w-CPO-�Q.pcph cmi:-4pu-Al—c Pcph PF"A� DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO FUSS&OWE" BY BY 8S-3� _ oormj* 9 ernwsR'as M� v/o D- 3-6 SOU tJ AVM E 1t.�►�1 r-I EDY RDAD/ °J q SHEET NO. SUBJECT: 5 iTLc �e+v Ew�Y �X'T eN�L -M,9Fr—,CI Z f Z STEP 2;LT From MAIW Street V � V, _ v +v v v +v —vll Flows.V. -- 3 AL+ 8vph Critical Cep,Tj("W-2) � _ ���� p j sty,c,(Fig,V-3) c,.= P� v X l00 �of�Utilized (v��X 100— � ( ,/4J IWedance Facto,P(Fig.W-5) P . I PIM &0 Actual Capacity.C. �' V4 �--P cph c.,—Cr,—._�pcph From Misoir Street Vo V„ SMNTH 1 :::: Conte Vc 1/2 v=+V,+V6+VS+V�Vd 1/2 Vs+V4+V3+VZ+V,=VC„ S(xc) -R-5,K Critical Gap,T.(�10-2) __._._.( ) Potential Capacity.c,(FIg.10-3) c,,o c,,t—— paean of c*Utilized (Ve/e�X l00 96 (vacri a x 100— 96 — 1 — lmpedanoe Factor.P(Fig.10-5) P o P��-- X P X P Actual Capacity,c. c„o—coo X P,X P. �•» c►� X :__X _ X- (Pcph (pcPh) SIEP 4:LT From Minor Street V7 Lv to V 3 +V +V —V V,n(s"3)+Vo+VS=V$io Cmdkting Fbws,VC a( P ) a `� Avph Critical Cap,Tc(Tab.]0-2) B. (Sec) .�O( ) cr( � 10-3) c,, " PcPh potential Capacity, Fig- ——��PcPh Cp10 c..� CP7XP,XP.XP„XP,= c..1o'cvloXP4XPIXPSXP, Actual Capacity. � p' X X 7 X__.I._X--1--(PcPh) —L_X_�X�(Pco) --- SHARM CANS CAPACITY MPM 9rRIZr APPRMCH WKWEMEM 7,49 Ma�mnart r(PcP1i) C.Q)Cpb) 4 PCO) ca-� - v LOS a O — 9 L (), L _ STREEr APPI�H M 14 Z 12 v(pcph) S.(P�) 4wtPcPh) c4�c,K— v IAS O o GL F n � 146 D u 31410 0 4S1 — MAJOR Sl•RW LFFPTURM 1,a -- I te o Z L o t F- 4 !v 4. 10 A rA3 EILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PRO�IECT N( BY BY ; n9 's gs-3 5�u..i Y/r�-1 A.tic� x f-lEfl�( Ro�►D.f ►9 / 1 m. SHEET NO. SUBJECT. / � 2 S vTaE �ZgZWAY C40W6lNED T12��FiG r VICj laYY a FOR a V R_LBG IN I HOURLY VMUM S eGrade-_% Lz -- STOPO L o Z N—Q YIEL.Dp Vt:Vie Via N ..J V• V � N-11D Grade V.�— Grade_�L% _ maim road / V3 (Fr! Iy ; ;O ;—Ell I,Vo I, IELD— — Datie of F4 a minor road Sn 0 ZZ(. Z- IL GgRas2-bZ'JC Avtrage awtins Speed• 'hP PHR Grade % VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Mom Na 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 7 1 8 9 ]0 11 12 *hnme(vph) / wl l .53414 5010 ZZb 7 p /Z %bL(pcph, see Table 10-1 SS o 49 8 3 VOLUMES IN PCPH S v r3 NA vt:vie vto v NA vs COY NA v, v= NA v3 v7 v0 vq SSol49 Fv.STEPL•KrFmmMinorStreet J Vt: Co mMaitg Flows V 1/2 V,+V=—V�, 1/2 V•+Vs—V�,= _ I +S-6—�vph Z + vph CzWwd CwkF6 Tc(rah b-2) (ow) - "=� ftom tW Caprd .c,ft W-3) cpq—1a�`$pcph e t:— �Pcph Pleroeat of ci,lhimed (ve/cl1 X 3w— % (vt,/c u)X 100— -3 % rocbx P f.WS) P,— A Pt: A��•C. — —��pcph Ltt—�rt2—4 70 pcph C G- �/ t SM A — -3_0,30 c s cam• K , �tSNan.L.I.�.z.�xisxoim d L�tl OLb OLV Z./ zt — � sm T A M.30 lobi (*b4a mwmM Zlixla IMMMM z bf2 6 — �- zs 7ZY 5i5 L _ SM A — "�_13 ( (qd3d)"y I (qd3d)L► 619'L S,LN3PMO K ADVOLLIV 133WS VONDq — A.MVM SN "1133NM (qd3d)Z�7xTX-J— (��x-T- Xx _ 15 x &► :—t X X-M— zs `d X'd X'd X'd X 01°3=°tm3 "d X"d x'd X'd X`�=s-3 "5'Aipadvo ij-W qd:)d—V_°�°� yd�d-'�- (£-a IW'3*pWr)inris ld (�) 0. (ems) (Z-a'W1)'1'dw`J pxwD 01'A- A+'A+(£ems)'�'A 4'A ='A+''A+(£ °''A 'A'SMOW BUOJ °'A� `A L p XOM mug 11*d3LS (qd3d) x (qd-4 x x = x - 'd X'd X"d3_11-3 'd X'd X� �me' 'S'Al� n'rJ RY % �n =`'d -T--n'd (S-ot�d'�3�IP�QI me ("s)S•t (ems)S•t (Z-M vM)31'dw'J Rq&J +�—+ + " � 'A—'A+'A+�A+'A+sA ' ZIT ''A='A+sA+'A+'A+=A Z/t -A WAOU SM.M.VuW3 "A $A i 1S XOM Mu3 HL T JM -' qd3d W =t�j s t�j V V r �''��'"'� "'�'�D�l.3ItRpv (S-M'W d iope1 wurpodkzq _ % =o(ff x r43/'A) s M x / A) P�Iyn a c )ss cam) (Z-a VD?.L Idwo ro -- ''A-to+'A "A =A+to "A VmOM J 'A f— 'A *M ssw3 n Z low Ali.S 'ON 133HS )Ivd l b 6 1 /Qb'obl Aq-vp " .� '91%w (-4v^!-rkos • aamnSwM -- ��se s�u�6uu��nsuoo A8 AS C _ JN.03fovd Uva Q3x:)Mo Uyu QnYdm APPENDIX E r L 1 1 , ' PARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC . O FUSS&O NSLL- PRE Consulting engineers BY BY A-3sa _ SHEET NO. Svwj%J� Aq�, of / �_._.-__ �..��E � �� •� ✓max:.- -. .4 - -_.. -�_-- < - . L - - - -. � . Z 450� N g t t Z 930 1319 4� _ -3 4 33 I.-T 42e MEET EXISTING GRADE EXISTING PAVEMENT MEET EXISTING GRADE Ole 4' MIN OR MEET EXISTING le WIDENING GRADE EXISTING. PAVEMENT 4' MIN. 01 SAWCUT 10 AS SHOWN ON'or + OR MEET EXISTING ��* PLAN I"/FT MAX WIDENING GRADE .♦ EXIS logeTING CROSS SLOPE MATCH EXISTING AS SHOWN ON CROSS SLOPE SAWCUT PLAN FT MAXso O 1 3 O EXISTING CROSS SLOPE MATCH EXISTING 6" CROSS SLOPE OD 3' 6 10" „ B O . 10" TYPICAL WIDENING SECTION IN FILL AREA ( NOT TO SCALE ) TYPICAL WIDENING SECTION IN CUT AREA NOT TO SCALE ) FIGURE N0. 13 (A) CLASS I BITUMINOUS CONCRETE !A00RJSS8,OrNE3LL. MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT Q CLASS 1Z BITUMINOUS CONCRETE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS Q GRAVEL SUBBASE Q BITUMINOUS CONCRETE LIP CURB - CLASS III GERBER SCIENTIFIC, INC. SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT ►ROJ 140 85-350 DATE DEC.1988 SCALE: N.T.S. 1