Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
88-105P SITE PLAN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION . /.1•��' APPLICATION FORM �.Ca�� Application No . . Dat R c ived : Action/ _ bY : , ��� � DEC 5 198� Rec ipt No. : South Windsor APPLICANT: THE ATLAS OIL COMPANY Planning & Zoning Commissfor ADDRESS : 414 Tolland Street, East Hartford, CT 06108 TELEPHONE: 289-6435 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : The Atlas Oil Company ADDRESS : 414 Tolland Street, East Hartford, CT 06108 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 779 John Fitch Boulevard, South Windsor, CT 06074 ZONE: G C NAME, ADDRESS, & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Frank E. Ahearn, Esq. P.O. Box 525, 5 Oakland Road, South Windsor, CT 06074 TELEPHONE: 644-2501 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR : (Check one of the following) 1 . Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) . 2 . Subdivision . 3. Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing required) . 4. Resubdivision (Public Hearing required) . 5. Special Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) . 6. Site Plan of Development. _ 7. Earth Filling [Section 10 ] and/or Earth Removal [Section 91 (Public Hearing Required) . 8 . General Plan of Development . 9. Regulation Amendment : Zoning Subdivision 10. Other (explain in detail) : CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED. BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICATE WITH ALL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS REQUIRED ON ATTACHED CHECKLIST. � 1 THE ATLAS OIL COMPANY G Applicant (kxMN9T Richard Kirkby, Vice esident PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION, CONT' D. TIME FRAMES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS/PLANS 1 . All prospective applicants are urged to confer with Town Planning D partment and Engineering Department staff prior to submission of any application to the Commission . 2. Plans are officially received only on the fourth Tuesday of each month at the Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) . 3. Three ( 3) sets of blueprints are required on the second Tuesday of the month for review by the Town Planning and Engineering Departments . This deadline must be met if you want to ensure that your application is officially received by PZC. These plans must be submitted as complete plans -- which includes application plus all required information contained on checklist. No plans will be accepted at the counter if checklist is incomplete. It is the applicant ' s responsibility to ensure that all information required on the checklist is submitted in one package at the time of submission -- including landscaping plans, architectural elevations, traffic report , etc . Planning Department staff will not accept checklists with blank spaces , or with "by others" in any space. 4. Town staff will notify the applicant with any changes required to make the plans in complete compliance with our Zoning/Subdivision Regulations . 5 . All changes requested must be made and new, complete blueprints must be submitted . At this time six sets of plans must be submitted . If a Public Hearing is required ( or optional but likely) then seven sets are required . 6 . Planning Department/Engineering Department staff will review plans only once -- if the resubmissions are not complete/correct , the Town Planner ' s report will reflect that revisions were not made as requested . CHECKLIST • REQUIRED INFORMATION SITE PLANS T r't or ()pjng Comm Siui This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E. /L.S . ) declaring that all required information is provided. Items 1-7 are required for all applications ; items 8-11 required where appropriate. Check mark for each item supplies . .X 1. On each sheet for plans or maps , -title block with the following information : X a. Name , address and telephone of applicant . X b . Name , address and telephone number of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer . X - c. Name of Development. X d . Date when drawings were made. ' X 2. Key Map : An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet , which can be used as an overlay on Metropolitan District Maps . This map will show the overall design of the Development and surrounding property within 500 feet . X a. Data block which gives needed zoning information such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of tract , number of apartment units , parking requirements , etc. X b . Layout of buildings X c . Layout of streets and parking . X d . Lines indicating proposed drainage system with direction arrows . X e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with direction arrows . X f . Names of surrounding property owners . N/A g . Proposed open spaces and recreation. areas. h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties . N/A 3. Architectural Elevations : Plans of the proposed buildings drawn to a scale of 1/8" = 1 ' _ 0" showing the elevations of all sides of the proposed buildings in sufficient detail to show architectural styling . Architect' s seal on elevations for buildings in excess of 5000 square feet (per CGS Chapter 390) . Page 2 (Site Plans),, X 4 . Plot Plan : A lay"out map of the proposed site drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets: ( 1) 24" X 36" with a 3/4" ruled margin ; ( 2) 18" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin , containing the following data: X a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and acreage - of site. Iron pins required at all property angle points and shown on map. N/A . b . Proposed streets and street lines with center line stations , curve data , and par-king spaces . X c . Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. . X d. Proposed buildings and other structures , including signs , outside lighting , and dumpsters (on concrete pad and screened) N/A e. Easements , noting grantors , grantees , and purpose . X f . Names of abutting property owners. N/A g . Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency . In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points , or other coordinated points , the monumented points within proposed site shall be coordinated . These coordinates shall appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. N/A h. All open space or other common or public land uses shall be indicated. X i . A-2 certification ; P .E. /L.S . Seal. X 5 . Topographic May : A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins shall in addition to the requirements of the plot plans show the following : X a. All. existing and proposed buildings . X b . Curb lines and pavement width , 'Sidewalks. C. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers:. X d. Existing and proposed water and gas main systems . N/A e. Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines . Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. Page J (Site Plans ) X f . Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in not less than two-foot intervals , but in cases of relatively level land , the contours shall be one-foot intervals and spot elevations . N/A g . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note that none are present. X h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch basins , endwalls , manholes , lengths and sizes of pipes. (Minimum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches . ) N/A i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm drainage system as needed. N/A j . Location and indications of existing brook channels , and 100-year flood limits. X k. A-2 Certification ; P .E. /L.S , Seal . X 6. Landscaping plan . X 7 . Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines . . N/A 8. Traffic report . 9. Plans and Profiles : A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches , including ruled margins and containing the following: a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with the profile . b . Street plan showing roadways and drainage. c . Sight line at driveway & street intersections. d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades . Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information. e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with,. all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material . f . Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. g . Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be used on all sites accessible to these controls . The Town Engineer shall , based on standard engineering practices , determine the accessibility of these controls. rage 4 k J l Ce r LdIIS ) h. Profiles shall show all sanitary sewer lines and manholes , including elevations , sizes , lengths , and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for building shall be shown. 10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans : For sites which - require or include a provision for open spaces , a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required . This maps shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet . N/A 11 . Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed , the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer . The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems ; the report should deal with the area as a whole , discussing the following points: a. General nature and development of surrounding area . b . Topography and natural drainage pattern. c . Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation , 'including soil absorption characteristics , ground water level conditions , ledge rock, and general nature of soil . d . General description of type of development contemplated. e . Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities , indicating sizes for various ground conditions , materials to be used , and the general layout pattern to be used , etc . f . Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems. g . Map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed layout . h. Flood heights of any nearby streams , brooks, or rivers . i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 4. 13 . 5. i All information required above is included in this application at the .time of submission. AZAIS �- 2 - 49 PLAN PREPARER P . E. I. . November , 1987 ATLAS OIL 1 . This is a request for site plan approval of a Moblil Gas Station which would contain a mini-mart and a car wash. The total site is 32,504 sq ft located on the westerly side of John Fitch Blvd, southerly side of Mascola Road, GC zone. Theire-i-s ourrent`ly a mobil station on the site. 2 . the applciant has recently received ZBA approval for three items : a. -sin G b. to have a canopy within the front yard facing onto to Mascola Road 7C4 -b c . to have 73 . 87% impervious coverage. 3 . It appears that all other zoning requirements have been met. 4 . The applicant has provided 5 parking spaces which are required for the 461 sq ft of retail . 5 . The applicant is proposing three curb c is onto the site. cuts off of Route �^to be exterior or exit only. The curb cut off of Mascola Road would allow for entering and exiting. The applicants traffic study supports this traffic pattern as the safest. The Town staff would like to see the entrances and exits on Route 5 cut down to 24-30 ft, subject to DOT approval. 6 . There are no regulated wetlands on the site. They have received conservation approval with the following conditions: a. a bond of $5,000 . b. elbows into catch basins to act as grease traps C . one construction entrance off of Mascola Road d. net stockpile area to prevent wind erosion 7 . The applicants landscaping plan looks quite aggressive) They propose approximately 96 juniper species, 4 white pines, 38 rhododendrum, 6 arborvitaes amd 2 dogwoods . 8 . The architecturals for the site depict a typical mobile station. If the application is approved, the planning department requests the following modifications; 1 . curb cuts of the surrounding property owners should be shown on the key map 2 . the ZBA variances should be noted on the plans . `� ta44 �I ri f t PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead, Fred Shaw, Richard J. Sartor, Gary Tyler, Fire Mars a Lanning, Jim Snow, Jerry Iazzetta FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# Zone Acreage 1 Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial f - Location: �����. -t �� �;' v ,� �c L� ; � =t�.� �r _,tier�;. ��" Project Description: N v Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Departm nt report. • DRAFT GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR EFFLUENT DISCHARGES FROM THE AUTO AND OTHER LAUNDRIES POINT SOURCE CATEGORY Anne M. Gorsuch Administrator JSg1 E0 STgTF S �^J LU -14 PRONG Jeffrey Denit, Acting Director Effluent Guidelines Division G. Edward Stigall, Chief Inorganic Chemicals and Service Industries Branch Elwood E. Martin David Pepson Project Officers February 1982 Effluent Guidelines Division Office of Water and Waste Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 DRAFT Wastewater discharge rates are affected by essentially the same factors that "-tct process water consumption rates. The major factor afi�cting the total .lime of wastewater discharged is the quantity of garments and flatwork being washed. Discharge per unit production rates are influenced by the types of materials handled, the soil loading on these materials, individual washing machine design and capacity, overall laundering capacity (larg?r laundries tend to be somewhat more efficient in terms of water usage than smaller laundries) and the degree to which wastewater recycle or reuse is practiced. In addition to the aforementioned factors which influence process :eater consumption, wash:eater discharge rates are affected by the efficiency of the extractors used. In Table 5-1, a universal wastewater-discharge-to-water-consumption ratio of o.9 Nvas assumed because it is typical of the industry as a whole (according to LSAA representatives). However, this assumption does not necessarily hold on a plant-by-plant basis. Wastewater discharge rates for auto washes to a large degree depend upon the type of facility, whether tunnel, rollover, or wand, and the number of autos washed. A brief discussion of wastewater volumes for each type follows.Tun n ls: A tunnel wask has the caDagity to handle 80-120 cars per hour, although the actual number of cars processed is usually much lower. The nUM er o cars washed per day at a tunnel facility ranges from n about 1_ nn to n,001 with average at_about 250. When fresh water is used for all cleaning procedures, an average of about 70 allons per car is used. A large percentage of tunnel facilities recyc a their w a5sh water, cutting their usage to about 40 gallons per car. Carry-out and account for water loss of 2-3 gallons per car. Tunnel washes then use between 40 and 70 gallons per car depen ing on whether the facility recycles its Istes or not. For the average facility, this arnounts to between 10,000 and 17,500 o.11ons per day. Ral 1 Gv These facilities q a much smaller volume of business than do tunnels, washing, on the average, 75 cars per day, with a range of i U-151-3. ,% typical rollover uses between 30 and 45 gallons of water per car depending on the length of the cycle and the number of passes the equipment makes. Exterior pressure washers may use as much as 90 gallons p:.r car. The typical rollover will discharge between 2,200 and 3,400 gallons per day with carry-out and evaporation losses about the same as tunnels. e number of bays at a self-service wand-wash may ranee f to over ten th an average of about 5. Each ba can Uetween s a�ho_ur, pending on the eng o the cyc a an the nu,n er of cycles used. A typical wand will provide 4 gallons of water per minute for 5 minutes, or 20 gallons of water per cycle. The customer is usually able to choose from among wash, rinse and wax modes and therefore the amount of water used for washing as opposed to rinsing may vary. However, most people tend to use about 2/3 of the cycle for washing and 1/3 for rinsing. Water losses,at a wand wash may be greater than those at tunnels or rollovers as the customer !s able to point the wand in any direction, causing water to be deposited in areas where it may not be collected in thic sump. Also, the high pressure (300-1000 psi) causes atomization of the water strear„ leading to increased evaporation. 30 l'T�S (';DATER) TRACY,ING - The primary reason water is tracked into the street at a location is due to high volumes of vehicles washed per hour and the relationship les of the exit door to •-the street. eY:i%, normally track for only the first 50' after the cycle. " rip time" is the Key to trackingg. As reasonable explanation as to "why" tunnels track Card we don' t : . "Because of the hign volune of vehicles washed in Tunnels compared ty, rol_overs and fte 3dditicnal services offered s .dash, c whr:el wash, et . , vehicles le-av i:.- :u-nels are =ryin more v :43ter than in =cll,.:vers." ':he way the closed loci 3y3�2"1 crer3�@S ./ `•v� _ 1 ter. is tre rinse water �s carried from the 100ation on the chassis, wheels, undercarria re cf the vehicle and is nandled by evaporat icn. {.n average vehicle carries approximately 3-4 gallons of water out of the bay wn_:;h balances the system. l'he major Portion f :"is •hater clings to the vehicle and is dispensed thrcu rh. -ormal evaporation process. ENVIRONMENTALIST II DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION AS THE RYQASH UNIT OPERATES, WASH AND RINSE WATER COLLECT IN THE WASH BAY DRAINAGE PIT. FROM THE DRAINAGE PIT THE WATER FLOWS THROUGH A 4 INCH PIPE TO TWO BOO GALLON UNDERGROUND TANKS. AS THE WATER TRAVELS THROUGH THESE TWO TANKS THE LARGER DIRT PARTICLES SETTLE FROM THE WATER TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TANKS, A A Hp PI.NP PULLS THE WATER FROM THE SECOND UNDERGROUND TANK AND FORCES IT THROUGH A FOOT VALVE AND TWO STRAINERS. THE FOOT VALVE PREVENTS THE PUP SUCTION LINE FROM DRAINING AND LOSING ITS PRIME BETWEEN WASH CYCLES, THE STRAINERS FILTER DIRT PARTICLES FROM THE WATER, PREVENTING DAMAGE AND PREMATURE WEAR OF THE PUMP. THE PUMP THEN BOOSTS THE WATER TO A CYCLONE SEPARATOR WHERE THE REMAINING SMALL PARTICLES OF DEBRIS ARE REMOVED. FROM THE CYCLONE SEPARATOR THE RECYCLED WATER TRAVELS THROUGH A FLEXIBLE RUBBER HOSE TO THE RYKQrJASH MACHINE. RECYCLED WATER IS USED ONLY DURING THE WASH PORTION OF THE RYKNASH CYCLE. WHEN THE WASH PORTION IS COMPLETE THE RECYCLED WATER IS SHUT OFF AND FRESH WATER FROM THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM IS USED TO RINSE THE VEHICLE. THE FRESH WATER IS PUMPED FROM THE SOURCE TO A SPECIAL MANIFOLD ON THE RYKOwASH MACHINE WHERE IT FLOWS THROUGH ADJUSTABLE NOZZLES AND ONTO THE VEHICLE, TO INSURE PROPER RINSING WAX OR RINSE AID IS INJECTED INTO THE-WATER DURING THE RINSE PORTION OF THE WASH CYCLE. ENVIRONMENTALIST I I WATER RECLAIM SYSTEM THE RYKO EwIRMIENTALIST II IS AN ECONOMICAL WATER RECYCLING SYSTEM IDEAL FOR LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL CODES REQUIRING THE CONSERVATION OF WATER OR MINIMAL SEWAGE USAGE. THE ENVIRUMTALIST II IS ALSO DESIRABLE WHERE WATER OR SEWAGE COSTS ARE EXTREMELY HIGH. THIS SYSTEM IS NORMALLY ORDERED AND SUPPLIED AS ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT ON RYKOwASH MACHINES, AND THE ENVIRONMENTALIST II WORKS ONLY WITH RYKNASH EQUIPMENT. BECAUSE THE ENVIRONPENTALIST II RECYCLES WATER NECESSARY FOR THE RYKCwASH UNIT, OPERATING COSTS OF THE RYKNASH ARE REDUCED. A STANDARD WASH OPERATION USES 15 TO ZO GALLONS OF FRESH WATER PER SPEED WASH AND 30 TO 40 GALLONS OF FRESH WATER PER SUPER WASH. WITH THE INSTALLATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTALIST II SYSTEM, THE RYK0AASH USES ONLY 3 TO 4 GALLONS OF FRESH WATER FOR EACH WASH CYCLE. RECYCLED WATER IS USED FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE WASH AND FRESH WATER IS NECESSARY ONLY TO RINSE THE VEHICLE. MANY LOCATIONS HAVE ACHIEVED A COMPLETELY BALANCED SYSTEM, OPERATING COSTS ARE FURTHER REDUCED BECAUSE DETERGENT NEEDS ARE LESS, DETERGENT IS SAVED AND REUSED DURING THE RECYCLING PROCESS, WITH THE DETERGENT TANK ON THE RYKQnIASH FEEDING ONLY THE FORMER WHICH REQUIRES A MINUTE AMOUNT OF DETERGENT SOLUTION. ADDITIONAL DETERGENT'MAY BE ADDED TO THE WASH WATER BY DUMPING DETERGENT DIRECTLY INTO THE SECOND UNDERGROUND TANK, NOTE: IF THE ENVIROWENTALIST II SYSTEM IS ORDERED FOR AN EXISTING WASH UNIT, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MAY NOT BE ENTIRELY CORRECT, CCtSJLT YOUR RYKO REPRESENTATIVE. i i I'hIf ovra)gow r0 ' TAar SEWS - L� NOT£:Unless O/herwisv Specified _ �'}'A- ALL DIM£NSIMS 6 DETAILS ARE SUGGESTIONS LW r CONSULT L ocAL ccoES FoR sofclFIC REou1R£MENTS. 1•'. •• AuwMAc[ i B CorwA+rA�Ic i' r a fir /fNv/NDrwNT4/tT Q CGvtKT MrST4LLATpYV PtnMfN/ /!/AtOT-IIOiD I� • 1' Abtf COAMwrA+IfN/l � l FERAL[ CAVIL AYI OM I•MK lROiY COAMARTYENT d if[ fiCT7rI11'" • •• " ICl/K O'AWAW/1M CLftN-AVr Pips cavutr[ /slam 4t»1 /01AAW COWAr AFANNOL[ u rt WAU f T[EL sRAr[ s-coNL�fst OLAAW COv[n ���: • •. - 1 !'-O'er!'-O' SfrfR -- :• �• %60 s F/r O'OA10 Ic-. _ • Srff[ iwArf I TO AVOID CLOSE.EIIsKET Ussms A"a 0119811 �.-O. • tOUrTKMT CaAe"rlErr .,-O� !"O /ILT[1l 9CR[[M AT INLET POINT I IIF[. • 1 _ ' 1l00 iAL.IANR AM AU.UAW Pfr A TANK! CAN Ar PW-CA#r •� I OO CAJT-Ar-KAQ COttiEr[. '��1r �' �+:!%;.•.,�':)�:� '> •?t:i:'r'�:• OFITN Or rA0" O[KAMV Olf • T I'-O •• ' i ; .; I/r. sY11Fsrn ALO+Rf or 147. I l 1 i If J'O' tt!'�' •t- ♦'Irr/t'AL 41TAMKE CAN Ed LOCATED IAW[R- il t s'�o' . +-- �'-d - • , r'-d OROWID Oulsict " IMA10! Irma SECTION A-A OAP. ' ACCEEIEILITY IOR IKPAIRE NUET K COWb"lk[D rM[Il LOCATING -- —L------ ' n TANKS, A r'1 I A/ROly - I • _ O'rvPf TO fAwm0*f vrAL/srll fNrfg CarrAtrrfNr D Poor PAL re e s rRAl#r* SECTION B-B MATERIAL TOL1RA"m RYKO MFG. CO. rwOoOCT I.In Asa T xR .03 DES MOINES IOMfA 6=7 R.w ss4 r aE .010 WIN w. ..� ArL.aR :••..11. au -�-� RTK,O TM NI-IT • AM ROT12 f 11 E1 JAPVD As MOT[D ,B,_g • SEE s co �s �, DAIAK ALL rrP/CAL S1IVCLE BAr LArOUT-Evil 1DGE&AND 100 LTR WAS DATE DIRURK All ~AWSOM ��m REVISIONS MOLES 15-12♦elf-ODD !3 Ryko Manufactudog Company •2531 Dean Ave. -Des Moines, Iowa 50317- Phone (515) 265-9831 -TWX 910-520-2546 DA y 20, 19e4 Z i I.J:- : noineering Data SL`�JEC`.' : composition of Ryko Eetergent, Rinse-'.:ff Max Luster RYE'. Detergent The chemical composition of vY..0 Detergent is a blend of ether sulfates and benzene sulfonates for the base system with an ampho- teric for soap curd dispersion and an alkanola;nid for foam stability in the presence of soil and oily films. The product is built with sequestering agents for use in hard water and designed to be com- pletely biodegradable. Tt contains no harsh alkalais, acids, or caustics and is safe to use under any washing conditions . oar'. Rinse-'. Rinse is composed of surfactants chose to promote the free rinsing of wash water from a freshly washed surface . _t is a olend encorooratin7 a specially designed oxylated ayiphatic base with its solvancy en'.hanced by -isopropyl alcohol. it also contains a xylene sulfonate in small percentage for its hydrotropic effects. This product used in small amounts will promote rinsi-;g and help to prevent water spotting. It is completely biodegradabe and safe to use. Ryyr .'lax Luster R'r►c.''� Wax Luster is a liquid blend of hydrophobic water repelling agents, surfactants, emulsifiers, coupling agents, and soluliziers. ;'one of the ingredients in the product are listed as r,PA hazardous material according to those as set forth in the Toxic 13ubstance control Act. The product is designed to be biodegradable and safe to use. The Finest Whicle Wash Systems 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING I J • AUG 1 q 31 Ph ' 83 •15.02: continued N O A W O C•0•MASS. . SEWAGE FLOW ESTIMATES Gallons per Person e of Establishment Per Da rL_ Boarding Schools, Mogos 65 ; Nursing Home and Rest Rome 100 School, without cafeteria, gymnasium orshowers 10 School, with cafeteria, but not gymnasium or showers 15 School, with cafeteria, gymnasium and showers 20 Swimming Pool 10 Camp, resident - washroom an toilets 25 ( � Camp, resident - mess hall 10 r Camp, day - washroom and toilets 10 Camp, day - mess hall 3 Camp Ground - showers an toilets - per site 75 �+ Gymnasium - per spectator 3 Gymnasium - per participant 25 Theater, Auditorium 3 , Public Park - toilet wastes Only 5 ' Public Park - bathhouse, showers, and fluahtoilets 10 Factory or Industrial Plant, without cafeteria 15 Factory or Industrial Plant, with cafeteria 20 W rk or Construction Camp 50 Gallons per day Single and multiple dwelling units - Per Bedroom , motels, hotels, boarding houses 110 Tennis Club - per court 250 Bowling Alley - per alley 100 Country Club - dining room - per seat 10 Country Club - snack bar or lunch room - per seat 10 Country Club - locker and showers - per locker 20 Church - per seat 3 Church - vestry/kitchen - per person at capacity S . Trailer, dump station - per site or per trailer SO Mobile Hoge Park - per site 200 Office Building - per 1,000 sq. ft 75 Dry Goods Stores - per 100 sq. ft 5 Drive-In - per stall S Non-single family, Automatic clothes washer - per washing mac ine 400 Hospital - per bea 200 Service station, exc u ing thruway - per is a 300 Skating Rink - 3,000 gallons per day plum 5 gallons per seat Gallons per Seat or Chair per Day R staurant, food service establishment, lounge, tavern 3S Restaurant, thruway service area 150 R staurant, kitchen flow 1S Barber Shop/Beauty Salon 100 NOTE: Laundromat wastes are considered industrial wastes and must be approved by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. Estimated sewage flows other than those listed should be considered in relation , to actual meter readings of established flows from known or similar installa- tions. Generally, estimated sewage flows will be based on 200 percent of average water meter readings in order to assimilate maximum daily flows. ; I Single Family Homes 400 gpd I Multiple Family Units . . . . . 200 gpd/b droom � . illm Vol. 12 - 233 <0 H S f,( ,.s U� Of S_0� ?d&U/414 C � C U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 y!�°SOR•c AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 20 , 1988 Frank E. Ahearn, Esq. 5 Oakland Rd. South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Application #88-105, Atlas Oil Site Plan Dear Att rney Ahearn: Attached is a copy of comments from the Planning and Engineering Departments regarding the above-referenced application. Please make the necessary revisions to the plans and submit 6 complete sets (including architectural elevations, landscaping plans, etc. ) to the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding the comments or the procedure, please contact me. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning cc: Town Engineer �l, +e ATLAS OIL SITE PLAN - PLANNING DEPT. REVIEW COMMENTS 1 . Plot plan should reflect access easement used by McDonalds 2 . Route 5 entrance is still wider than Town staff are comfortable with TABLE 3. OBSERVED TRAFFIC FLOW MOBIL STATION ROUTE 5 AT MASCOLO ROAD August 18, 1988 3:00 to 5 :00pm Enter from: Mascolo Road -1 Southbound Route 5 49 Northbound Route 5 14 Total Entering 64 Exit to: Southbound Route 5 50 Northbound Route 5 15 Total Exiting 65 Average number of customers = 32 per hour YEAR 1987 STA NO 132 20 YEAR 1987 1 "sI A wU tic STATE OF CONNECTICUT STATE OF CON,NECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - BUREAU OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH BUREAU OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH PLANNING INVENTORY• AND DATA PLANNING rINVENTORY• AND DATA TRAFFIC RECORDER DATA - TRAFFIC RECORDER DATA ,TOW'N OF SO. WINDSOR ROUTE USS DIRECTION N TOWN OF S0. WINDSOR ROUTE USS DIRECTION S LOC NORTH OF GOVERNORS HIGHWAY LOC NORTH OF GOVERNORS HIGHWAY DAY SUN MON TUES WED THUR FRI SAT DAY SUN MON TUES WED THUR FRI SAT DATE 0 420 421 0 0 0 0 DATE 0 420 421 0 0 0 0 TYPE 22SOO TYPE HOUR 1987 ADT = 11500 HOUR 1987 ADT = 11000 BEG ( 250/4 Ply% BEG MID 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 MID 0 0 60 0 O 0 a lA 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 1A 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 2A 0 0 28, 0 0 0 0 2A 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 3A 0 J 23 0 0 0 0 3A 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 4A 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 4A 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 5A 0 0 174 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 194 0 D 0 0 6A 0 0 509 0 0 0 0 6A a 0- 1067 0 0 0 0 7A 0 0 824 0 0 0 0 7A 0 0 1616 0 0 0 0 SA 0 576 578' 0 0 0 0 8A 0 894 964 0 0 0 0 9A 0 510 562 0 0 0 0 9A 0 580 521 0 0 0 0 10A 0 592 0 0 0 a 0 10A 0 - 546 0 0 0 0 0 11A 0 617 0 0 0 0 0 11A D 589 0 0 0 0 0 12P 0 725) 0 0 0 0 a 12P 0 655 D 0 0 0 0 i P 0 706 0 0 0 0 a 1 P 0 595 0 0 0 0 0 2P 7 728 a 0 0 0 0* 2P 0 668 0 0 0 0 0 3P 0 1113 0 0 0 0 0 3P a 791 0 0 0 0 0 4P 0 1483 0 0 0 0 0 4P 0 763 0 0 0' 0 0 5P 0 1256 a 0 a 0 0 5P 0 729 0 0 0 0 0 6P 0 651 0 0 D 0 0 6P 0 448 a 0 0 0 0 7P 0 396 0 0 0 0 0 7P 0 339 0 0 0 0 a 8P 0 257 0 0 0 D 0 8P 0 223 0 0 0 O D 9P 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 9P 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 lop a 125 0 0 0 0 0 lop 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 lip 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 lip a 106 0 0 0 0 a TOT 0 10074 2910 . 0 0 0 a TOT 0 8227 4573 0 0 0 0 RECORDER 0 24 HR = 11844 G — 4 RECORDER 0 24 HR = 11315 G — 4 A TABLE 1 1 ' R A. HESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC• 101 MILLBROOK COMMON•BLOOMFIELD,CT 06002•(203)242.7755 August 19, 1988 Mr. Leon Dues Atlas Oil Company 414 Tolland Turnpike East Hartford, Ct. 06108 RE: Existing Mobil Station Route 5 South Windsor Our File: 88089.00 O ar Mr. Dues: In accordance with your request and authorization of August Z, 1988 we have conducted a review of roadway and traffic conditions in the vicinity of the existing Mobil Service Station on U.S. Rout 5 n ar its intersection with Mascolo Road in South Windsor. The purpose of our analysis was to become familiar with existing roadway conditions and traffic operations in this area so that we could det rmine if there were any situations which warrant concern with respect to traffic movements that would impact your plans to conv rt this facility into a modern gasoline dispensing facility with convenience sales and a car wash. It is anticipated that our r port will be useful to you, your site planner and to South Windsor town officials in determining the traffic impact which may result from th modernization of this land use. U.S. Route 5 is an historic north/south roadway in the Connecticut River Valley. This Route 5 designation is carried along John Fitch Boulevard in South Windsor and along South Main Stre t in East Windsor and forms a portion of the roadway which begins in N w Hav n and extends north throughout Connecticut, Massachusetts, and V rmont. Many years ago this roadway served as the principal traffic studies traffic engineering traffic planning north/south roadway in central Connecticut serving both local and through traffic. Presently most of the interstate through traffic is carried on Route 91 west of the Connecticut River but Route 5 continues its important role for commercial and industrial traffic as w 11 as commuting activity on the east side of the river. The speed limit along Route 5 in South Windsor is 50 miles per hour. The roadway provides the two lanes of travel plus a shoulder in each direction. The cross-section includes a center island in which periodic openings are provided for left turns. A left tur n storag lane is constructed within the center island at important intersections to provide additional capacity at signalized intersections. Land use along Route 5 is predominately commercial and industrial in East Windsor and residential and agricultural in the northern sections of South Windsor. At a point about one half mile south of Rout 194 (Sullivan Avenue) the land use in South Windsor becom s industrial with some commercial/retail activities near its intersection with Strong Road. South of Strong Road, land use abutting the roadway continues to be a mixture of commercial and industrial properties with some scattered residences with that land us continuing through' the area of Mascolo Road. Land use along Route 5 immediately south of Mascolo Road includes, in addition to the Mobil station, a McDonalds Restaurant, A&S Boats, Valley Lawn Sprinkler Company, Inc. , Sepinos Restaurant, Route 5 Motor Sales, Inc. , the office/industrial complex at 681 John Fitch Center, and a small strip shopping center at the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road. Mascolo Road is a two lane town roadway extending to the west of Route 5 to a cul-de-sac and serving a numb r of light to heavy industrial properties including the Plas-tec Coating Inc. , Massie and Sons Inc. , Diamond Roller Corporation, Levack Construction, Research Instruments, Bernsten' s Generator Spectrum, Ourco Manufacturing Company, and Oral Machine Shop. Mascolo Road intersects Route 5 at a location where an opening is provided in the center island such that left turns, both entering and exiting this area, are permitted at a unsignalized location. A traffic signal is in place just to the north of this area, at South Satellite Road which serve's the industrial development in Park Centre. While Mascolo Road is provided with stop signs the presence of the signal at South Satellite Road provides a gap in the traffic flow and permits traffic to exit from Mascolo Road. Atlas Oil Company presently operates a Mobil Station with 3 pumps and a limited number of convenience sales on the west side of Rout 5 immediately south of Mascolo Road. That property is provided with two driveways to Route 5 separated by a grass safety island. Rout 5 in this area is on a level tangent alignment such that there are no sight distance limitations for traffic exiting the driveway for movements to the south. The divided nature of Route 5 in this ar a prohibits movements from this facility to the north. Records maintained by the Connecticut Department of Transportation' s Bureau of Planning and Research indicate that the average daily traffic on Route 5 near Mascolo Road is in the order of 25, 500 vehicles. Table 1 illustrates the hourly variations in traffic along the roadway and compares the northbound and southbound flows during various hours of the day. Table 1 indicates that Route 5 is a highway serving the needs of commuters as well as local shoppers with a pronounced peak in southbound traffic during the time period from 6 to 9 a.m. and a similar obvious peak in westbound traffic during the time period from 4 to 6 p.m. During the morning from 6 to 9 a.m. , more than 70% of all traffic on the roadway is southbound. During the afternoon peak, when a number of shoppers and others are utilizing the roadway in addition to commuters, the directional distribution is 64% with the predominant flow northbound. Traffic during mid-day time periods tends to be mor evenly distributed in both directions with hourly traffic flows typically between 600 and 700 vehicles in each direction of trav 1. Our office has conducted traffic flow counts during a typical afternoon commuter peak period to determine the character of traffic and the direction of approach and departure at the existing Mobil Station. That data is presented in Table 2 and illustrates that th majority of the traffic at this location is drawn from the southbound lanes of Route 5. This is understandable since northbound traffic wishing to utilize these facilities must execute a U-turn to ent r and then similarly must execute a U-turn and travel somewhat to th south on Route 5 to again reverse direction and travel north on Rout 5. Also, as indicated in the data, there are a limited number of vehicles who do exit the northern most of two driveways serving the station to enter the northbound lanes of Route 5. This maneuver is not proper, should not encouraged, and could present hazards to motorists. Atlas Oil Company proposes to reconstruct and moderniz th existing automotive service station. We have r viewed site plans prepared by Alford Associates, Inc. , civil engineers of Windsor, Connecticut, which indicate the elimination of the existing building and pump island on the property and the construction of the new, modern, combined gas sales/convenience store with self servic , high speed, multi-product dispensers and a car wash for the convenienc of the customers. The site plans depict a complete rebuilding of the driveways serving the facility to provide a much greater definition of driveways and the setting back of the pump islands and building a much greater distance from Route 5. In addition the site places indicate a creation of a new 40 foot driveway connecting the property with Mascolo Road. This is a highly desirable feature and it will permit the traffic utilizing the facility and desiring to travel north on Route 5. to exit to Mascolo Road and properly make a sat left turn to enter the northbound lane. It is recommended that signs be posted in the northern most drive connecting the property with Route 5 indicating that it is a "entrance only" with exiting maneuvers prohibited. Similarly it is recommended that the south rn most drive on Route 5 be provided with signs near Route 5 indicating that left turns are prohibited and that the adjacent lanes to Rout 5 are one way southbound. The plans depict a facility which will provide for a much gr ater efficiency in the pumping of gasoline by providing self-service and high speed multi-product dispenses and provides a layout when virtually all traffic will enter the- facility from the northern most drive on Route 5 and travel in a one way pattern westerly for servic add d to the traffic stream, but was merely served by the facility. Only 25 to 35 percent of the customer traffic at gasoline stations then were generated by the facility. Assuming an hourly traffic flow of 50 customers, then approximately 35 would be "stopping off" and only 15 would be considered "new" or "generated" traffic. Th property is located on Route 5 which has developed as an area with many commercial and automotive activities and with many retail facilities furnishing services which depend on vehicular traffic. The Atlas Oil Company property appears well suited for this highway and, in that sense, is not at all unlike other businesses in th vicinity. It is my opinion that the site plan as developed by Atlas Oil and Alford Associates, Inc. , which provides for reconstruction of two existing driveways to Route 5 in essentially their existing locations but with a much deeper "throat" into the property and with a n w driveway connecting with Mascolo Road will result in a significant betterment in traffic patterns in this area. The larger throat will r duce the potential to traffic making unsafe exiting maneuv rs to travel north on Route 5. In addition the provision of a new driveway to Mascolo Road will provide a safe and convenient means of xiting traffic joining the Mascolo Road traffic flow and making a safe 1 f t turn to travel north on Route 5 without the need to travel south and execute a U-turn at one of the median openings on Route 5. In my studies I observed the sight lines available to traffic within th proposed driveways and and that available on Mascolo Road and find that the vision afforded to entering and exiting traffic exc eds minimum standards and affords ample opportunity for traffic ntering or exiting the property to s e and be s en by approaching traffic on Route 5. Th divid d highway on Route 5 cr at s a situation wher exiting traffic must concern itself with only one direction of traffic on Route 5 at a location where traffic signalization somewhat to the north creates a number of gaps permitting a safe exiting maneuver from the property. Exiting traffic must take caution in observing U-turning traffic destined to either this property or to McDonalds, which is located immediately to the south. However ample sight lines and ample width is available to insure that both maneuvers can be made with safety. Based upon my studies of the roadway, traffic conditions, and land uses on Route 5 as well as the site plan prepared by Atlas Oil Company and the driveway locations depicted on that plan, and taking into account the traffic volumes and the manner of traffic op rations on the roadway in this area, it is my opinion that this modernization will not result in traffic congestion and will not produce a traffic hazard. The driveways proposed for Atlas Oil at this site fully conform to current policies of the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles, the Connecticut Department of Transportation, and acc pt d traffic engineering practice and are located so as to provide saf access and egress patterns for traffic entering or leaving th , property, the modernization provides a very definite improvem nt ov r the existing pattern of access and egress to the property. The facilities indicated on the site plan including the pump islands, convenience store, and car wash can be adequately accommodated on this site and ample maneuvering room, storage space and parking ar as are available to avoid the appearance of congestion or hazard eith r within this site or on the adjacent roadway. I appr ciate the opportunity to pres nt my findings to you, and I will be available as may be nec ssary to assist in th pr s ntation of these findings to the appropriate authorities in the town of South Windsor. Very truly yours, F.A. ESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Frederick A. Hesketh, P.E. E A. HESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 101 MILLBROOK COMMON•BLOOMFIELD.CT 06002-(203)242-7755 August 29, 1988 Mr. Leon Dues Atlas Oil Company 414 Tolland Turnpike � East Hartford, CT 06108 "•,'�,�. ^}� �'• ; F t ¢ RE: Existing Mobil Station Route 5 JAIV 1/-Qc South Windsor Our File: 88089.00 south & Z .Pdant�rn � Gntn�l i,�i;;;,,issl�r Dear Mr. Dues: Reference is made to my letter of August 19, 1988 relative to traffic conditions and access patterns at the proposed modernized Mobil facility on John Fitch Boulevard at Mascolo Road, South Windsor. I understand that subsequent to the preparation of that report your office, in consultation with South Windsor town officials, amended the site plan to reduce the width of the southern most driveway by 10 feet. It is my understanding that South Windsor officials have requested this reduction •in order to reduce; the: potential for southbound traffic on John Fitch Boulevard to utilize the southern most driveway as an entrance road. It is intended that that particular driveway be used primarily as an exit particularly since vehicles exiting the car wash are in a direct liner with that driveway. It is my opinion that the revision in the site plan to narrow the driveway so as to reduce entering movements at that location is consistent with good site planning practices and does not alter my opinion that this modernization will not result in traffic congestion and will not produce a traffic hazard. Please advise if we can assist you further in an evaluation of your plans for improving this location. Very truly yours, F.A. HES TH & ASSOCIATES, INC. K14V/6 Fre: Brick A. Hesketh, P.E. FAH/1st Disc. S/Traf. 9-88 traffic studies traffic engineering traffic planning 7 f 7-70 Y ATLAS OIL COMPANY JOHN FITCH BLVD SO. WI SEPTEMBER 6 , 1988 32 '-4'X4' GALLEY WITH N4khE c.n n, (60 FT/DAY PERMEABILITY) TOTAL FLOW PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS AREA 0 . 746 ACRES 1VTAL HgA� IMO(APE)Q(PIPE) Q(ou-r GALL.E`15) = O � O O C = 0.49 TC = 5 MINUTES 0 0 o. 15 I2a = 7 . 1 2 O _ O 085 Q25 = 2 . 6 CFS 2.5 015 0.4 01 3 1.0 0,a5 '0Aco 9 21.0 I .z,5 HEAD IN FEET ABOVE FLOW LINE BOTTOM OF GALLEY = 88 FLOW OUT IN CFS 6" FL OUT = 90.0 HEAD FLOW OUT ELEV. AREA OF CONTOUR VOLUME BELOW CONTO 0 0 88.0 149 0 1 0 . 15 89 . 0 149 149 2 0 . 3 89 . 5 149 224 2 . 5 0 . 78 90.0 149 298 3 1 . 31 91 .0 149 447 4 1 .85 92 .0 149 595 YEAR INTENSITY MAX IN MAX OUT MAX EL. DRAINAGE AREA= 0 . 38 50 7 . 7 2 . 63 1 . 63 91 . 6 RUNOFF COEFF= 0. 9 25 7 . 1 2 .43 1 .53 91 .4 TIME OF CONCENTRAT 5 10 6 . 2 2 . 12 1 . 36 91 . 1 INTENSITY= 7 . 7 5 5 . 0 1 . 71 0. 99 90. 7 ANALYSIS FOR 50 YEAR STORM 2 3 . 6 1 . 23 0.49 90. 2 PEAK FLOW IN= 2 . 6 INTENSITY 7 . 7 50 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0 0 0 8 0 .0 0 . 0 88. 0 1 0. 5 16 0 16 0. 1 0.0 88 . 1 2 1 . 1 63 1 62 0. 4 0 . 1 88. 4 3 1 . 6 142 5 138 0 . 9 0. 1 88. 9 4 2 . 1 253 13 240 1 . 6 0 . 2 89 . 6 5 2 . 6 395 27 368 2 .4 0. 7 90.4 6 2 . 3 544 68 476 3 . 1 1 .4 91 . 1 7 2 . 0 674 150 524 3 . 5 1 . 6 91 . 5 8 1 . 7 785 245 541 3. 6 1 . 6 91 . 6 9 1 . 4 878 343 536 3 . 5 1 . 6 91 . 5 10 1 . 1 953 438 515 3 .4 1 . 5 91 . 4 11 0.8 1009 529 479 3 . 2 1 .4 91 . 2 12 0. 5 1046 614 432 2•.8 1 . 1 90. 8 13 0. 2 1064 680 384 2 . 5 0 . 8 90. 5 14 0.0 1069 727 342 2 . 2 0 . 5 90. 2 15 0 .0 1069 756 313 2 . 0 0. 3 90 .0 ' 16 0 1069 774 295 2 .0 0. 3 90.0 17 - 0 1069 791 278 1 . 9 0. 3 89 . 9 18 0 1069 808 261 1 . 8 0. 3 89 . 8 19 0 1069 823 246 1 . 7 0. 2 89 . 7 20 0 1069 837 232 1 . 6 0. 2 89 . 6 21 0 1069 851 218 1 . 5 0 . 2 89 . 5 22 0 1069 863 206 1 .4 0 . 2 89 .4 23 0 1069 875 194 1 . 3 0. 2 89 . 3 24 0 1069 887 182 1 . 2 0 . 2 89 . 2 r 27 0 1069 917 153 1 .0 0. 2 89 .0 28 0 1069 926 144 0. 9 0. 1 88. 9 29 0 1069 934 135 0. 9 0. 1 88. 9 30 0 1069 942 127 0 .8 0. 1 88. 8 31 0 1069 949 120 0. 8 0. 1 88. 8 32 0 1069 ,t 95'ro 113 0. 7' 0 . 1 88. 7 33 0 1069 962 107 0. 7 0. 1 88. 7 34 0 1069 969 100 0. 6 0. 1 88. 6 INTENSITY 7 . 1 25 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 0.0 0.0 88. 0 1 0. 5 15 0 15 0.0 0.0 88 .0 2 1 .0 58 0 58 0 . 3 0.0 88. 3 3 1 . 5 131 3 128 0. 8 0. 1 88 . 8 4 1 . 9 233 10 223 1 . 5 0 . 2 89 . 5 5 2 .4 364 22 342 2 . 2 0. 5 90 . 2 6 2 . 1 501 52 449 3 . 0 1 . 3 91 . 0 7 1 . 9 621 131 491 3 . 2 1 .4 91 . 2 8 1 . 6 724 216 509 3 .4 1 . 5 91 . 4 9 1 . 3 810 307 503 3. 3 1 . 5 91 . 3 10 1 . 0 879 396 483 3. 2 1 .4 91 . 2 11 0 . 7 930 481 449 3. 0 1 . 3 91 . 0 12 0 .4 964 559 405 2 . 7 1 .0 90 . 7 13 0. 1 981 619 363 2 .4 0. 7 90.4 14 0 . 0 986 660 326 2 . 1 0 .4 90. 1 15 0.0 986 684 302 2.0 0 . 3 90.0 16 0. 0 986 702 284 1 . 9 0. 3 89 . 9 17 0 . 0 986 719 267 1 . 8 0. 3 89 . 8 18 0 . 0 986 734 252 1 . 7 0. 2 89 . 7 19 0.0 986 748 237 1 . 6 0. 2 89 . 6 20 0. 0 986 762 224 1 . 5 0 . 2 89 . 5 21 0. 0 986 775 210 1 .4 0. 2 89 .4 22 0. 0 986 788 198 1 . 3 0 . 2 89 . 3 23 0.0 986 800 186 1 . 2 0 . 2 89 . 2 24 0 .0 986 810 175 1 . 2 0 . 2 89 . 2 25 0. 0 986 820 165 1 . 1 0. 2 89 . 1 26 0 .0 986 830 156 1 .0 0 . 2 89 . 0 27 0. 0 986 839 147 0 . 9 0. 1 88. 9 28 0.0 986 847 138 0 . 9 0. 1 88. 9 .29 0 . 0 986 855 130 0.8 0. 1 88. 8 30 0 .0 986 863 123 0. 8 0. 1 88. 8 31 0.0 986 870 116 0 . 7 0 . 1 88. 7 32 0 . 0 986 876 110 0. 7 0 . 1 88. 7 33 0. 0 986 882 103 0. 6 0. 1 88. 6 34 0 . 0 986 888 98 0 . 6 0. 1 88. 6 • CIVIL ENGINEERS WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.a L.S. WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.a L.S. � HYD(�Avt.�� An)Al.YSIS P�.EPA R� Foy ATI,As OL cor )pArNY JvHN Frr,/N gr_vP. So. WI 0soP, SEPfE mek'-12. (01 EXISTING ZS YEA12 Ft ovq AREA 0.74(o ACRES G = 0.49 -r� S s rnw4 wrSS �25 = -' 1 QZS = 2, Co GFS PROPosEo ZS **,MR2 FLOW AREA = o,74(o ACRES o,36 AG To GALL�F-YS , O.3(PO A6 BYPASS To C A L.I.EY s DY PA SS A = 0.3t3 A A = o.3(o(o AG G ° 0.'9 74- 5 rrn IN• z5 7.1 =75= 7. 1 QZ;�FOZOIM c-ALLEYS C., PIPE S ) = a. 3 GF 11 QLS &YPASS I.Co 4 G FS THERE WILL- BF, A Z5'/, REPUGTiON OF THb ZS YEAK PEAK rLOW THKoUGH I'HE tr=C Or T►-IE LCAu-ZING GALLEYS. y - - DATE;:' ..PREPARED:FOR:-,ATLAS.._OIL. . �o PANY' ALFORD ASSOCIATES - HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS -LOCATION: __..�HLJ--FIT�IA-- _6010 - 50. WWC ,Of;- _ CIVILENGWEERS-WNDSO-.:, ONN_ T Q P-PE PIPE PIPE PIPE VELOC'TY VE'_OC:ITYFREMARKSTFL}GTU AREA "Cr A x C I SCOPE - LENGTH CAPACITY FLOWFULL DISCHARGE FOB{-TO Ian TOT_ INC. COT_ INC. TOT_ INC. TOT_ INC. TOT IINCHESI IFEETI C.F.S. I FT_/SEC_ FT./SEC_ -6 0 , o,o4,l 0,9 0.0151 eI-� law 1 s 011 .4,0 13.Z I I - 3 •65A art b. - 10-3 4 I S I 171 - 19,41 1c:�> 1 0.1 1 79 4.0 $3 1 I 1 1 .3 • 3 0.20 0.9 0,1 1 - 171 I-:51 - I - - I I i I I I I � I - I _I _ : I . -. I -1 I I - I - -- o,lect T"(,PS OIL COMPA N y Designed by (� DATE JoN►,.j FIT-CH AL�F&-<D STREET 15L\/D, FT RM A4j5cYJftS Checyed by Shetz ?�o. lulls r+ d-21 O �3TdB� TTrLj0 M o �9 I i . o ado-[, o •p O ad-rd -TO �iIIa'I N ' m a� A .0 >1 CA o N — N �C�Tsua�uj Tt�e-u��2i ti N =424 UT Ir/ uT sag d) N O � aWTW pa,aT-..=Z)Ob L() LD adTd uT amT- I m - I I I I ;aTul °; amTy N I N � T�a=90S auT. N � V Inlet Station and Offset I I I I I �Jn) IU1 ^' Time to Inlet LJ Area in Acres O N � Runoff Coefficient I ( I I I I I Al I I I o o Sum of AI 1kP I Total AI I� W Rainfall Intensity I O to Inlet r O O NF� Grade of Gutter n o s O O. o. Cross Slope of > 0 Shoulder W �t L7 O N I Depth of Flow N z at Gutter N �•' Width of Flow z 0 Q r Q Bypassing inlet AI Bypassing Inlet N O Al Entering Catch Basin •o�� �aauc iq Pa,)taa40 W2iI3 �050NIM •05 Jazia6,LS °) 6 3Ztza dQ nq PauaTsaQ (y Vd WO.2 *I t Sb")J-v d .:oa oz �. r Y nF i ►� �, �, i� � I K � t� CIVIL ENGINEERS Y WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT WILSON M.ALFORD,SR.,P.E.&L.S. C)E 14BF WILSON M.ALFORD,JR.,P.E.&L.S. South � indsor 14YOO�-,AUL_►c- ArJALrYsIs planning & Zoning Commission PaEPAP'Lo I-OK ATLAS 0L Corn PA"1 r JOHN F-rrfH glvC? 5D. y iNosop-_ SEP]"E mr3E►� �� I y 8� EXI�TINC� 2S YE�112 Fl.ov�l FlI,EA : 0.74(p ACRES G = 0.49 -r. = s m►N u-rEs QZS = 2, Co GAS PROPOSED ZS YYrAl2 F'LOW ARCA = 0,74(o ACR-ES o,36 AG To &Au-EY5 , o,5(a& 116 &YPAs�� To G A L�L�EYS bypA SS Am 0.;50 A C— A = O- 3(o(a AG G 0.9 G = 0.(03 -r� - S mInI�TtiS 7( S mIN� �5= 7#1 �Z5 = 7, 1 C r Orin OAL.LE-Ys C PIPE ) = O. 3 GFS 1 Qzs BYPASS 4 GFS G?zs 1, b4 + O, 3 - 1 . 94 (::5r!5 THE1\C W►L-- 13E A 25% REp UGT ON 6r T►--IE z5 YEA K PEAK rL.OW THKauGH THE L)SC Or TOE I-EAcHING GALLEYs. - DATE: - ..PREPARED blL- . eom ANY ALFORD ASSOCIATES HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS _LOCATION:—.- CIVIL ENGINEERS•W NDSO-.-- ONN. P-PE PIPE PIPE PIPE VELOCITY Vc�_O�ITY REMARKS STF,L}CTZJrc AREAL "Cr A x C Tc I Q SI.:E SLOPE LENGTH CAPACITY FLOW FULL DISC!-tQRGE FROM- TO Ii4C TOT INC, fOT_ INC. TOT_- INC. TOT. INC_ TOT. [INCHES) IFEETI C.F.S. I FT_ISEC. FT.ISEC. I �,�-� (o,oco ia•osl I 171 I , I s o 5 40 '{,c f 3,2 I o,g = o,Z ! I I I I I Cs3 -C?AaAk I0. 10. 4 I S 1 17. 1 I 1c:!) I D 1 (p 4Ar2IZC� .033 3 0.201 0.9 0,1 I I ! I I o.93 I z9 5,4 I --, 7 - . - I • I i 1 I I I I _� - - - _ f I I I f 1I - I r ATLAS OIL COMPANY JOHN FITCH BLVD, SO. WINDSOR SEPTEMBER 6 , 1988 32 ' -4'X4 ' GALLEY WITH 1 ' STONE ( 60 FT/DAY PERMEABILITY) TOTAL FLOW PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS AREA = 0. 746 ACRES � HEAO(PIPE)q(PIPE) Q (OUT 6ALlZY5) C = 0.49 O O O TC = 5 MINUTES I 0 D O. 1 5 I25 = 7 . 1 2 O 0 0. 3 Q25 = 2 . 6 CFS 2.5 015 0,1_ 03� 3 1,0 0.65 2.0 1 I Z C5 o.� HEAD IN FEET ABOVE FLOW LINE BOTTOM OF GALLEY = 88 FLOW OUT IN CFS 6" FL OUT = 90 . 0 HEAD FLOW OUT ELEV. AREA OF CONTOUR VOLUME BELOW CONTO 0 0 88. 0 149 0 1 0. 15 89 . 0 149 149 2 0. 3 89 . 5 149 224 2 . 5 0. 78 90 . 0 149 298 3 1 . 31 91 .0 149 447 4 1 . 85 92 .0 149 596 YEAR INTENSITY MAX IN MAX OUT MAX EL. DRAINAGE AREA= 0. 38 50 7 . 7 2 . 63 1 . 63 91 . 6 RUNOFF COEFF= 0 . 9 25 7 . 1 2 .43 1 . 53 91 .4 TIME OF CONCENTRAT 5 10 6 . 2 2 . 12 1 . 36 91 . 1 INTENSITY= 7 . 7 5 5 .0 1 . 71 0 . 99 90. 7 ANALYSIS FOR 50 YEAR STORM 2 3 . 6 1 . 23 0 .49 90. 2 PEAK FLOW IN= 2 . 6 INTENSITY 7 . 7 50 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 . 0 88 . 0 1 0. 5 16 0 16 0. 1 0 . 0 88 . 1 2 1 . 1 63 1 62 0 . 4 0 . 1 88 . 4 3 1 . 6 142 5 138 0 . 9 0 . 1 88. 9 4 2 . 1 253 13 240 1 . 6 0 . 2 89 . 6 5 2 . 6 395 27 368 2 .4 0. 7 90 .4 6 2 . 3 544 68 476 3 . 1 1 . 4 91 . 1 7 2 . 0 674 150 524 3 . 5 1 . 6 91 . 5 8 1 . 7 785 245 541 3. 6 1 . 6 91 . 6 9 1 .4 878 343 536 3. 5 1 . 6 - 91 . 5 10 1 . 1 953 438 515 3 .4 1 . 5 91 . 4 11 0. 8 1009 529 479 3 . 2 1 .4 91 . 2 12 0. 5 1046 614 432 2 . 8 1 . 1 90 . 8 13 0. 2 1064 680 384 2 . 5 0 . 8 90 . 5 14 0. 0 1069 727 342 2 . 2 0 . 5 90 . 2 15 0 . 0 1069 756 313 2 . 0 0 . 3 90 . 0 16 0 1069 774 295 2 .0 0 . 3 90. 0 17 0 1069 791 278 1 . 9 0. 3 89 . 9 18 0 1069 808 261 1 . 8 0. 3 89 . 8 19 0 1069 823 246 1 . 7 0 . 2 8-9 . 7 20 0 1069 837 232 1 . 6 0. 2 89 . 6 21 0 1069 851 218 1 . 5 0. 2 89 . 5 22 0 1069 863 206 1 .4 0 . 2 89 . 4 23 0 1069 875 194 1 . 3 0 . 2 89 . 3 24 0 1069 887 182 1 . 2 0 . 2 89 . 2 25 0 1069 898 171 1 . 2 0 . 2 89 . 2 27 0 1069 917 153 1 . 0 0. 2 89 .0 28 0 1069 926 144 0 . 9 0. 1 88. 9 29 0 1069 934 135 0 . 9 0 . 1 88. 9 30 0 1069 942 127 0 . 8 0 . 1 88. 8 31 0 1069 949 120 0 . 8 0. 1 88. 8 32 0 1069 956 113 0 . 7 0 . 1 88. 7 33 0 1069 962 107 0 . 7 0. 1 88 . 7 34 0 1069 969 100 0 . 6 0 . 1 88. 6 INTENSITY 7 . 1 25 YEAR STORM TOTAL TOTAL WATER TIME Q IN IN OUT STORAGE HEAD Q OUT ELEV 0 0.0 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 . 0 8-8. 0 1 0. 5 15 0 15 0 . 0 0.0 88. 0 2 1 .0 58 0 58 0. 3 0. 0 88. 3 3 1 . 5 131 3 128 0 . 8 0 . 1 88 . 8 4 1 . 9 233 10 223 .1 . 5 0 . 2 89 . 5 5 2 .4 364 22 342 2 . 2 0. 5 90. 2 6 2 . 1 501 52 449 3 . 0 1 . 3 91 . 0 7 1 . 9 621 131 491 3 . 2 1 .4 91 . 2 8 1 . 6 724 216 509 3 .4 1 . 5 91 . 4 9 1 . 3 810 307 503 3 . 3 1 . 5 91 . 3 10 1 . 0 879 396 483 3 . 2 1 .4 91 . 2 11 0. 7 930 481 449 3 . 0 1 . 3 91 . 0 12 0 .4 964 559 405 2 . 7 1 . 0 90 . 7 13 0 . 1 981 619 363 2 .4 0 . 7 90 . 4 14 0. 0 986 660 326 2 . 1 0 . 4 90 . 1 15 0 . 0 986 684 302 2 . 0 0 . 3 90.0 16 0.0 986 702 284 11 . 9 0 . 3 89 . 9 17 0.0 986 719 267 1 .'8 -" 0 . 3 89 . 8 18 0.0 986 734 252 1 . 7 0 . 2 89 . 7 19 0.,0 986 748 237 1 . 6 0. 2 89 . 6 20 0.0 986 762 224 1 . 5 0 . 2 89 . 5 21 0.0 986 775 210 1 .4 0 . 2 89 .4 22 0. 0 986 788 198 1 . 3 0. 2 89 . 3 23 0.0 986 800 186 1 . 2 0. 2 89 . 2 24 0.0 986 810 175 1 . 2 0. 2 89 . 2 25 0. 0 986 820 165 1 . 1 0. 2 89-. 1 26 0 . 0 986 830 156 1 .0 0 . 2 89 . 0 27 0.0 986 839 147 0. 9 0 . 1 88. 9 28 0 . 0 986 847 138 0 . 9 0 . 1 88 . 9 29 0. 0 986 855 130 0 .8 0. 1 88. 8 30 0.0 986 863 123 0. 8 0 . 1 88. 8 31 0.0 986 870 116 0 . 7 0 . 1 88. 7 32 0. 0 986 876 110 0. 7 0 . 1 88 . 7 33 0.0 986 882 103 0 . 6 0 . 1 88. 6 34 0. 0 986 888 98 0 . 6 0 . 1 88 . 6 r e � N � _ Al Q� �"' Line Segment I l� na Time to Inlet ( I I i I I I I w I Time in Pipe,II I I I mat I �1 �Jl v1 Acc=,alated Time . O O N d Al Entering Catch Basin Sum of AI in System N � 10 ' .. Lj�l I i � V J � � Rai � v, I I I n.au Intensity C+ I i I - I y ca I— I I m' Q in System cn Pipe Size a d c� m S o Length cf Pipe 4 I slope Average �locity. I � Capacity -Q I z F.e adxater o �� � ' n� oil saa�5JA A4 Pa�oago 7M 12 Q�'1� Z332iZS 4?��'�� G 3S,K4 &q patzS taaQ 111 �UaD� /O 5b�1aG'o-►d r • Inlet II Station and Offset I I I• I I I I I I � NTim e to Inlet � � Q 4' Area in Acres 4..F N W O RunoffCoefficien t l I I I I I AI III � o II N o I I I Sum of I � i AI i� I • � I I I Q �� o I I I V Total I CAI otal AI I Iil I II I— I I I— M Rainfa ll In tensit Y II to Inlet �zsYi2� 1 rT 1 Y J a O n 3 W N Grade of Gutter O 0 � O. Cross Slope of O Shoulder O L� Z Depth of Flow N at Gu ter 4 w Width or Flow low z Bypassing inlet ►I �D . o O AI Bypassing Inlet 1-j Al Entering Catch Basin •o•T oaauc `'q Pa�toa4G 7N1 5�1bi�Ossy WZ3I3 0�056NI r 'or ITH- ILS nq aM� H71i� NHoF �Q G 3Z�4 dQ Paual s a Q Vd WO] '1 I O SV'11'd :o a Mz d • y. r � . AO~N 8Eq 4 • r Tiov 0-ig Sou� ?d&U&Ot O C V 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 4' SOR•coN� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 5 , 1988 M E M O R A N D U M TO: John McCahill , Zoning and Wetlands Enforcement Officer FROM: Michael J . Gantick , Director of Public Works 4 RE: Atlas Oil , Route 5 This memo will serve to respond to a question raised by the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission regarding drainage for .the. subject. application. . The proposed...site/driveway grading is such that there is a high point approximately 50 feet from the exit point of the car wash, with positive. drainage .back into the site toward the car wash. The car wash system, as described by the 'applicant, uses approximately 4 gallons of water per vehicle with approximately 9 - 10 vehicles washed per hour . If water is tracked out 50 feet beyond the wash/dry area it would drain back into the site away from Route 5 . MJG/jsv cc: Project File Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning,--" i RUSSGLL AND DAWSONARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING 60 WASHINGTON STREET HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 TELEPN NE (203) 323-4291 DAN LYMAN RUSSELL. ARCHITECT SUDHAKAR V. NAGARDEOLEKAR, ARCHITECT ROBERT M. DAWSON. 111. PIROFFOSIONAL 9NGIN69K Mr. Irwin Singer LS V Atlas Oil Company 414 Tolland Street DEC 9 PA East Hartford, Connecticut 06108 Re: Auto Facility South Windsor, Connecticut File: 8883 Dear Mr. Singer: At your request we have reviewed the design data for the car wash to be installed at the above site with special emphasis on the overflow characteristics, if any, of the system. We have also inspected site design drawings by Alford Associates. The unit proposed is an RYKO Environmentalist II (EV11) as manufactured by the Ryko Manufacturing Company of Des Moines, Iowa. Manufacturers information disclosed that between 15 to 40 gallons of water are used per car wash depending upon the speed of the cycle chosen. Using the worst case, approximately 90% of the water used is recycled back to the system. Approximately 4 gallons of water is apparently carried away from the site on the car surface following a wash. This water is replaced by makeup water from the main water source. Most of the water carried away on the vehicle evaporates rapidly as the vehicle is driven from the site. A small amount drips from the vehicle as it exits the car wash in the first 50 feet of exit driveway. Some of this evaporates and the balance is drained into a drain outside the building. The grades at the site slope back to the building for a distance of 50 feet from a high point which is located approximately 50 feet from the highway. Thus, 100 feet is available for "tracking" water from the car wash although only 50 feet is normally required for removal of drip water. It appears that this site has ample space to prevent drip water from falling on the highway. In our opinion the configuration of the site and the type of safeguards built into this car wash system will allow the system to function without overflow of excess water to surrounding areas. We trust this information is helpful. Very truly yours, RUSSE DAWS ON ot M. J wson, III _ Consulting Engineer - y RMD/nla - _ �O'ji Sf� Co O�P S'OU� ?d&&460t O C u 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 �'►'osoR co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 20, 1988 The Atlas Oil Company 414 Tolland Street East Hartford, CT 06108 RE: Application #88-105P Gentlemen: At the December 19, 1988 meeting, the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved with modifications Application #88-105P - IWA/CC permit for the reconstruction and modernization of an existing motor fuel station and addition of a one bay car wash. The following modifications must be adhered to for this permit to be valid: 1 . Black and white transparent mylars of sheets # 3 of 3 with the above modifications and this letter reproduced thereon together with two blueprint copies of the entire set of plans, must be submitted to this Commission to be stamped and signed. This must be completed and reviewed prior to any construction activity on the site. 2 . Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 3 . The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation or use. 4 . The permit is valid for one year and shall expire December 19 , 1989 . 5 . All approvals required must be obtained and submitted prior to any activity on the site. 6 . A contact person shall be identified directly on the plans . NO. (-� 1 19 RE EIVEO FROM - � - � � r �- DOLLARS Account Total $ Amount Paid $ cy� Balance Due $ "THE EFFICIENCYO LINE"AN AMPAD PRODUCT-23-121 - s E A consultants Inc. January 17, 1989 Engine rs/Archit cts PrincipalsMr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. Arnold B Goldstein,PE Director of Public Works Frederick G Aufiero,PE Town of South Windsor Robert M Brandon,A I A 1540 Sullivan Avenue Stephen H Genbo,PE David T Goodemote,PE South Windsor, CT 06074 Bruce E Soule,P E Kenneth M Stewart,PE Re: Atlas Oil Company Anthony J Zuena,P E p y Job No. 89026.01 Associates Steven L Bernstein,PE Paul F Gabriel,PE Dear Mr. Gantick: Mark Gould,PE Michael S Schultz,PE As requested' S E A Consultants Inc. has reviewed the following for Arthur A Spruch,PE g the above referenced project: Paul C Ross,PE Sheet No. Title Prepared By Date 1 of 3 Key Map, Layout Alford Associates 6/6/88 & Grading Plan 2 of 3 Landscape Plan 6/6/88 3 of 3 Conservation Plan 6/6/88 & Topographic Map --- Hydraulic Calcu- 9/6/88 lations -- Traffic Impact Hesketh & Assoc. 8/29/88 Study This information was reviewed for compliance with the Town of South Windsor Subdivision and Zoning Regulations dated July 24, 1972 and standard engineering practice. We note the following: Section 4.13.2.1 KEY MAP 1. Names of abutting property owners, within a 500' radius of the site, should be provided. b. Layout of building should be provided on the Key Map. c. Layout of parking should be shown on the map. d. Lines indicating the proposed drainage system with directional arrows should be shown on the map. 850 Silas Deane Highway e. Lines indicating the sanitary sewer system with directional Wethersfield,CT 06109-3412 arrows should be shown. (203)721-7993 485 Massachusetts Avenue Section 4.13.2.3 PLOT PLAN Cambridge,MA 02139-4018 (617)497-7800 Citicorp Park West c. Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations should 100 Foden Road be shown on the plan. South Portland,ME 04106-2319 (207)775-2281 s E A consuitants inc. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E.Engin ers/Architects January 17, 1989 Page Two g. Monuments should be coordinated and these coordinates should appear in tabular form on the plan. I. This map shall be entitled "Plot Plan" . Section 4.13.2.4 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP C. The proposed sanitary sewer should be labeled on the plans. d. All proposed water and gas main tie-ins should be located on the plan. Section 4.13.6 CONSERVATION PLAN 1. Soil boundaries and classifications should be defined on the plan. 2. The filter fence should be labeled on the plan. 3. If only one construction entrance is to be provided, a note indicating the exclusive use of this entrance should be designated on the plan. Otherwise, additional entrances should be provided. 4. Temporary stockpile areas should include erosion control measures shown on the plan. Section 5 AREA, YARD AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS ���—� 5.2 The maximum lot coverage of 73.87% provided in the Zoning Analysis exceeds the allowable of 65%. Section 8 OFF STREET PARKING 8.4 The parking analysis shown on the plans for this site should be clarified. The analysis indicates that ten (10) parking spaces are required for a floor area range of 0-10,000 s.f. However, Section 8.4 indicates that for a retail store, 10 spaces are required for each 1,000 s.f. of floor area. Based upon this formula and 4,610 s.f. of retail area indicated, 46 parking spaces will be required. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Drainage for the proposed car wash facility has not been indicated on the plans. In accordance with Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection regulations, a discharge permit will be required. An oil and water separator must be provided to treat wastewater from the washbay before being discharged into the existing sewer system. Daily flows should be provided in order to evaluate existing capacities. Oa-, sy.f,le, Ta sAs-". SEA Consultants Inc. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. Engineers/Architects January 17, 1989 Page T1 we,&. 2. A note to remove existing fillers and underground tanks has been indicated on the plan. However, the exact location of the tanks is unclear. 3. The capacity of the existing 15" R.C.P. between the existing catch basin on-site to the v tot-.e- located along Mascolo Road should be evaluated. s tv"V, ! eXV Cr- 1-Y*" 4. Drainage has been analyzed for the 2, 5, 10, 25 and 50-year storm frequencies. However, the analysis must also include the 100-year storm frequency. If you should have any questions, please call me. Sincerely yours, S E A Consulta is Inc. t John T. Holland JTH:ap �towN sf,q<Go 01 `�• o C U a � o wc` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•COCA AREA CODE 203/644-2511 M E M 0 R A N D U M January 19, 1989 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works RE: Atlas Oil Company Engineering Review Please find enclosed the SEA engineering review for the subject application. Should you have any questions, please contact me. MJG/jsv cc: Engineering Department PZC Correspondence l RUSSGLL AND DAWSONARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING 60 WASHINGTON STREET HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06106 TELErMONE (203) 525-4261 DAN LVMAN RUSSELL. ARCHITECT SUDHAKAR V. NAGARDEOLEKAR. ARCHITECT RO■ERT M. DAWSON. III. PRO►EGGIONAL ENGINEER January 27,, 1989 Mr. Irwin Singer Atlas Oil Company 414 Tolland Street East Hartford, Connecticut 06108 Re: Auto Facility South Windsor, CT File: 8883 Dear Mr. Singer: To add to the data we have compiled regarding the effect upon the adjacent streets and paved areas from water carried from a typical car wash of the type proposed for the above site, we inspected a similar operation. At approximately 1:30 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 1989, observations were made of approximately 10 cars that were washed at the Troy' Mobil Facility at Bishops Corner in West Hartford. Weather was clear with an ambient temperature of approximately 56 degrees Fahrenheit. It was observed that most of the water carried out of the car wash on the body of the automobiles dripped off on the pavement in the first 25 to 30 feet of exitway. This water was captured by a trench drain or evaporated rapidly. Beyond this point very little dripping occurred and the only observable moisture was wet tire tracks for a distance of 30 to 50 feet. The tire track moisture evaporated and disappeared in approximately 1 to 2 minutes. The observed facility has a total dimension for runoff of 37 feet from the building to the sidewalk. It should be noted that the total dimension available at the South Windsor Facility is over 100 feet from the building to the street. Based upon our observations, we reiterate our opinion in our previous letter ' that no harmful overflow of water will occur from this system. We trust this information is helpful. Very truly yours, W L and DAWSON M. Dawson, III Consulting Engineer - - RMD/nla _ y a� j + 1 The following is the information you requested along with copies of all supporting documentation. First to support our justification of using the average of 75 cars per day as users of a rollover type carwash I have attached page 30 of the EPA study of February 1982 and a cop of page of the 1986 Professional Carwashing Magazine 1986 Automatic Carwash Survey titled Non-Conveyor Statistics which show the average number of vehicles washed in 85 to be 80 per day. Now, based on 75 to 80 car average, I have attached a copy of a page from Ryko's Environmentalist II water reclaim system information which specifies that our system only uses 3 to 4 gallons of fresh water for each wash, the majority is recycled water. Now the carryout and evaporation per car is approximately 2 to 3 gallons. This also stated on page 30 of the EPA report and on Ryko's information on closed loop reclaim. Based on all of the above we can now show that washing an average of 80 cars per day (the high side) using 4 gallons per car (the high side) we would use approximately 320 gallons of fresh water which could enter the sewer system. This is still less than a single family home as shown on the Department of Environmental Quality engineering Report on sewage flow estimates. Dick, I feel that when filling out the report on estimated flow to sewer that you should show no more than 160 gallons per day basing that figure on: 80 cars x 4 Gallons of fresh water 320 - 2 gallons (not carried out on vehicle) which would equal the 160 gallon per day estimate remember this is strictly for the carwash facility. rti A DECK,. IG ' F ArN 40LPs,�-Z � QUINC�a � rL t.K,, , 't..o C— Or DErr,c.. ' ��a•:1• � � , r 1 C�� �• bO t t.o AWID 40 Z." GH i q LLN Iz i 1"1 • 16 Lit. - - �'� w , � F� � Zo� o • � Alt . �•T Go a l f a fL 44 ti E A G r-�► N D s Crc-N'r CA..- e P G HP,N JL •�� Ole . G I 0 E-r--L C C,7 a na �f�$ a r-� Z. 2•'�, l Go N i'If1fa 1 N 1-4 a it • & Zoning Commissiu�i�:.y�Fs � ��;.•'• soon L C�'" e � M j 1. Cosy p w� a ��r tiuwt�• w tttts►�■ Mw r�wt� k MAIN aImm w�1w out auto IO (:AA w N»mAtonu P ooFr on%amns Pont"MUM pill am im .r t�cye�l a L. corer. •• ' 24•']b r+Douti-PA. Cps eo/L x, I NCB RI�tK�Y l Cdec=F e-A=^J>s Zo.7 tt • Oar• to lWOF e no 8S r•+ WL.A Wtr+r1 er v r • TDOF D�C.�L. �Sfryt��tc_60 j!) AL1 2S.S Um-i <306L v 1s"s..1•�k M .140aaf tt '30's r N N if M ma s tZ r'io 7 A4 v 0 �rw►• ah' , h ' S Gfl'& -5u -22414 rL t't l}SE'CS�d.'1 _ %4& 044 T-116 • t1gr 10�a[tx S4 O�► _ _ A s w •(6.5'UL Sit*4 + 'L. � .Z�11i = Xf Ms 4 IL • r'1 t.SO°I'r , 'oit -W. (b.s K5l �� + °� 4-43 XJ --+ M :140 c 1st5'!i ►. us& wo.l&1 15•779 -A ft :.ors Icarv.mac..%a& .&r nkL%, - : - ac txt u.-ti.t f i • ZoZ)4 LA TJ 4 tom; :. Oft.ow . cP Rroac w• &-A. - w - s� . 51� •ZA.?• Z2pP.!•f 4 31,"3th 4s- -2,0 1-.;. c Tip• it A, %.&e%..�:..� C�•�1(��e�(''�eS (c,t5.c�� r. 12 ft b - 'o*� . ,yF���� Zs14j# 21431 2oRb+► 't(.SS K • . S937•• (-rkm-GSS606 _ - v '1*`,' c - � No, 11421gone � 15770*yIsrOt eo +r'1 14 T30'A -A.•1'S42d�r� ��"s�'''v'•''�� ���� L��fc. Lt�•�T�.'? t*. '0MAL EH� pw y��it.r..tu►� 1O'O� s Tn• 825 r�•►s i 7:. • y % W3 ft^Ak i6 • `j Z3 L:.�� �,r� `I 1:11�. _•0+ ........� a.m. woNam fmw"m p E C 13 1988 ' .•.�.. •.�..No .w.... lopup . � o�w ws■t � � I lti �.■r.�.ir.moos r ' z r _ r=�1-31t .Z> usf zo � L (s�E AS 14-Zalr� 455� D�- Z A . sSS+i : (Z489*)(IO.S)/3 = `IS[o�l++ vvL�a , -75S"Id' iZv� �(t24•b9��l O S)I3 i $"�12 a� U S jc T S'3*•3`� 14 'T 1�g t L��.L�r'1•J S 37 KL: /�.5 r �.. `o•,a • 7-4.Z.P 4 I�ase.ac.w � (Z'4',d`���(1�.92�• z 90C.0� , 3 , �t ZIloO<�rs:' ><I.33= z8'130�c. VS� 3"•� Yam.. 1 piT �A� Z.�r,1lo�PS< �Z�1 jQ;•Oti USfc (a OF rs fW >�� �ti1P (ex 43(Gb 90toO 012 Lis We LD IS 3►,3" it, To W 8"IS AND CIbK%.L- T- 5-7 1 Z a r1Ax , Z 510e S of 1 1,8rC FtoJ FL.jae-tig � g� 12 S Wt> or. CB F�ooe ��Si 104 1-1I7-ct w Ca.s�>(los� + r3 j 492pH r`11, P- B-712 a ' �z r, g c.�. 'k Rfd • StlOat _ � �r ��; _' No. 11421 • Z5.1�2 Mc � 1.J G •�yy�. �l.^.7F►iLO,�'��P'�� u5�wb.�1S -�� • (�0,210 4si 7-46 33) 3Z.�• o K �J,.-�nAL•L, �'', _ •. �v NG • piZ. USE. C..�"1815 �b = Z�.1-1 4.ti il•(.O NI) '•�' 13 Lc.ti♦ C ��,,r, "CMOs$$a J �IJ SNT 2 OF own wum"m r wnu r a�n r tnwra /% R - . MA 1 n a,4 ,.,,.il I I-I fs111 DEC 13 1988 Jim$N*Ma1 w+W&MI wawa P""Alror UACTON FPON-)T WALL W (S Irztl(IDs, pbs� • ZO - .o = 2A9, 1 >r. & uSk C.1Zx 20� -�L �,.1 1 Lti, c Fb 21.(o L.s. : Ott � r r Ce.OSS f-ntr'1�25 n�.•.�= R3b3"M• �Sds1T11�►<<ZL �3 C-fs4xZ� Ilc.�> �1 1^ r no v�2-r M�-►aerZs -rs�x4 Le nmAx:31,2iO*O R. 4 6.9•S 1..., .l,(I.3> :•pry fI E Lc. ls4�tZ��iL r1MAr • 8 )12:'iL -1 b- (o.l..ti<.�, c Z1 (.o(1.3'i> :.p K cz"v► EL.-1 Kor I'L 'Ts4xZ.-To VEiL-( CpL. r b3"1i USA fPCnINL_ PeN ALLAeh.51)n CAL• ^iG is C.M ySE '�-s�b� ASO1•� 6Y 1�.1SPCC"IIOtJ 41��JC�rTO G L ATZ R-r,L. (1Z")(1-s1> - IS72 K try SAE kV-wA;L- c,00b FOR- Z41 r f-f • C)1.t F L.po e Ll�sa� LL Sir pl_ ZOp b� FISO(c C>(--C, 'jam —+ ZZC, So r-> f ctS'e C1OtJspLIFO .f"� GpOLz, ps-i I=L0=w— 'Tv S • r,�. 11421 J' -lot -A ENG�a��''r 4 0 ` I� S►Y OF Ion w rruanr r �w locus r am a tnrtstit R MMIRT CA rug rLTtitgtl ttirTr.tout DEC 13 1988 r S a,31 nb-M1 r c.aur.swt ants 11NI/1►It•1 1ta1 liJ1Ti1 uti awsu.0 r.t joe M O tOir"ba"I tr tGtCTttr r ' � �. N�nDcr` � Pt_ur-�eI rev 4•+frs�_ u�=11,45� ios:t� = Zor.> eZi tr - • - r 8 TST 1mb-up W1 10o - 7-0 = 3bot.�f .1 r<� r; 4 0 �rLQ C 1K --LS ��f 1 � N N t` r m 6 � + P-U P Cp Cd".'s As NI�• 241� 1t � �'1�'- qZ�D� J T9I 9 �d II 4 9 rn �T ri •xpDf •tG0 1� �� 70pP 3DZCA , rip. 1357+� � io.s� ohs,p E FP- M 1c � I�SSG CBK1\.S BPSE T 1 iMAK L AS1Q'� s36 l•-lo4 ►Lti'► L F` = �IIoO�P�• d�C MP1c �oA o -so I-OFT 'r'r 40-70 ik *"79 S tL c 4$l05 rs USA 1 �/4 a3 ZS &I-T •�•r 1 tJ C�S Lpnjj. 12" W1pE 'fooTitv6� x 12��=nrU Nl�f. G�F.Cr CAZ O 7.nS gr L1471/2.1-1Z t o5-r- Z(� sG; 1 (P� P ) < �. :.Q 1tJ v� �j 1• Sot ,.31tS:lillii��i , �;F U�� '•�� No. 11421 i 4Ci �' EIM p tMEarN• it EEiLa!Et let 0{REEIWE DEC 13 � R awEm u n1� Eillltt>� no IINrN.Ilm"XIII �J l� 1986 1>O � t#Naar 7MEi 0111 ply Ea►w1 tat+Ub-MI Yi, SOB r D ut rwtraK:uC �>{M�iNUL�I�EE;Cr10a r � ! �r l,,`� •may` �I�k'� T ' ' �• ' ! ��;1 fy .� 4�r f'1 •�.R 4 •�7`••.v, �t' Ir. I� r��i'' +grli'�.�.�.a t.=�d•lw�7fjy, � ,�i y,,,,.,�i.• Fhi�,rt?• •� I , r.' (. L_q�1. j `11+�� 'r. •; ry �r A.y M'•,r• w.x4pil•t•i 6M1��•t'y. � i _. ��• � 'Y .. F- r% 'Y.. Y:i�`ti'(`�.:~:r•I i (- r ,S', r - t, 4' •� �!•[(' *• h '�!.� • ry• k:� ,•�•/ •� .t� ..r i•�:•.,4�.�J1+ ��.J�ja7�• �• ! .'•'���^ 'i�, .Y..y ~i,ti�'/,iw K��•.+1 Kl''n.�' ,., � :,� 'a. - •^ ��•�'.tti ►.,1 ': *. •,•�' f.ax�4 •►r.• - �� �.. ra .'R •1",. ' �� � - � 1t��� �'I .,, T i' �.}' •k l��I �'J �+i '1•J, .. 'I 0,',i,; ,• TuNoor rid �-�- .:; _ y '• r_ ,. ,If, G!ti 1�• i�M 3 f 1 �� a. C ti Amp ).5(zS� • 37•S r6 VPN t�` �N�•,�C.1 A� ?,={� 11 KaLI� b PLf it is: (yam.oat.� 1> V i t ZL �► Cs r D k G.� a �r r Fi N, W) ►'�.. • 19(0'1►/� �. �` •(�1(��1b,/�.ZZ� 14.tS �.+:• �ZO:•OK r . `y Mir t 3T3'�J. ---�L•(�-,3'�(��yc.x� • u,.'i91..:• 10 old rY J� so �� use z2�. �• M,r. Zq9'•►/ f (zn•>>(ic.��aZZ Z�.`16 1.11(sa .•.D� f O CSJ L-1 o-� SL3PPOL"TS VSrr- L-'s,a�y,a1 sLwrcCTt-P Ccl 41-v" oc w'tt+�Z•3'i� W s (14.5S (e;l.Zq� - S MD,1 (-,.& - 11 Z 4 �► '� p .t { ;' 1.7.11-L-N16 OTC �; Z�JS�• - _ zi 14 V1 PLAN 1'*= Lb' �: �o• 58�+ Ro•��o� IT �f u��., •-294�4 'eo,a • - il5prs Moy*�' 1 D'12 l, l�.o �r►' of CaN,y�e,, �� .••��--••.Fc'►� Q P'In�w b•'4p1 1�, L�• l 4.�Z ,�`��,,o�p,S �• S�,���, 0 Ln%Q q; No. 11421 �11 i 1 s�ONAL 0' 06464" I rra i w S. OF L ..�w w..w r s rca�r �n r p►� k moo=0 son ..�.�.. �..mom mum IN" DEC 13 1988 � L,...n.i.�a.s 114 XIt. I% Wo TOP +30 Ab 6) AD7$- rp Pot" I. - V-11'6. or IA3 I Z 13 lu L• L4.Sol ^a-.aC- -I we.. 55,.ki tar'WT 10-7 9 DO'tvLx 2 6ZO w 14- Mom L SZ59 a oL -44 7n dorp 10700(24-37) sui (W-4) Xj. 0 (IIZ40*&L 1&67-0 4 MAK 14 (4 5 L'04 L TI 224 L CZ 4 4.5 rl J Q, vL 4al W 4D# LOtaCp V4 W 14 4�i S.P IJ C-A 1> TO :la ti F4 114.4 sNj r-)/6ds--ll - O.S9 5 •• '`o F c o ,1411%,IV$�0 w4zt� V4 • w ws s Now z 11421 0 %,I I'-A4 do, c>be— 0 41 A L rt. 4 1 04a49&&vfisAj960 POT ow "ism no slow ILW as" DEC 13 1988 •lam"MTV""'am d 311 ow / .e l�1 ie,.� m.aw•.e sm-at"um was visms aft �� >��a awe Immus WSW o Q , (J 1 -9 Sr ,..ds -,—a ��1 �19 11►AI b�s � 1 j♦�t,`1 1'/�a PI z� 4 'r,s �� •�, �.cecv t�•ijL aia s,t 0V_v a$�-9 'nci -9 °L �-9' +: LL�1�7„1 ( -!f S'V ywvS z-s �t t LIOLY d S�y 2 a1Sc1 -'Q ZG`�o�l.'�'SC`�r� wd of �,n• 4r bS•Z `1 t�s �,,�-x�v ��1�l., 4 6 x I M �sc� ,�1t� V• �' • b a-bZ �'01�i C .06 , � 2G9 1= r, 4Z11)S5 0*%.j ter• Hge��y . e�� .e�� • ,,+ilt 1. • 4 bS- 't tl �3� �slv 3�?l� �M� �. • S�•y tt•t SY 8 `on)Qt i'A �vw)jo vs 'J 1`,L r M> ZZ�'�I N� a till • �' ' ' to taw ' • „ �•.•�Y,:•l. 1'y .•.»' .�ti-•;+'�-M.,i.�a...' r tom±,:' +'� •.. t�� !i4 Fr• _ � �7 •►u' ,�ir,i';l'r• ` • � ' , `,,i j,.•�''�.�,� •'tL•'Ff{1.; 1W��'7��`�,►V ,►�;�,A�_ ,1"r�. .i'• �.�;�'•"'�}.Y .Y..��s.�A��vti r��.'t�yf y',�•��•7•� � •1,F•� ''• :�+ ��"fu`i'11�ih1.''•:A:.�"tii�•:F-+i��7Yl,L�'w.�"if L�~.�':w�i�"J'1�.�'iL�'z}%�`•k�a _ ._ ... � '� 1 • .y !,��► �� —� •8& � ,..• � r t, i. 1}'f��T ♦G •'r'Yt' ,p:}.Ti���}�••i' ,,�` ,��� . T .��., ' V •"•�`.t;•w.y+[^rd'i. r4"Zt- i,..�',J�.i,�L•}`•'�-.►;+� - i{i., �• i • Yw�a�Mi • •a �•. -f�..lsvtes.� w�Nca • * 44 Y ss lx•su4$�(!s•D� �1,427. J �633 use ov M .. ' uscsnua"A". wrk1D� ` � s �•:• - �w•ao• ��i �z,;;D�'�1�' t�Z�;ZS�Il1�3 1 /b ta�:.�. a �vSlo{„� q ll , r►=s IZ s 1'LS.4 :•Fw i 1.S 4�: ��/{. 'O,ti_', YQ +1 s 45.g3 y 14 A 4 29 2awl r;. 8�}•�.�. rv�c .. o*c 4 ram•. . �"b•r L G G�#L Z7.V 4:. •1.•ZZ • •'3�i�7�.: :•OTC TS b•3i. �T' c�cs�►to��� - •.ao 3.5 d41 • •c I.T3.Z'7.1.Icw - } -�» =l1ZZ�(o••z�s��t = 2•'sb��� �-Z��1•'S3 " vSE --"I: - Vrr'EiC CAL-T10� ' Ca1CN't r1AY � GI� OKLCT D � _ - �w•�o •P.•..�a4,lc0 k .•.�tb- I$.41�s `+ . 1 S j:t g;.p �Fo Q 0--f A►S S-S� H A 5 � �Ww�pn.'i 1�� GO+J IJIG L"T 1 G/�•• _ . . ._ •••`��a P.����;�Vic,.•�'•1' - - IL �M•.� ` •Z � a 1` .J ,M,S.� `c, -�•...�,� • CP- z z'xc.� j: 1 I - USa� !y� - �� No. nazi 'PD ti F 1ST: S vbfil 3. � S t 4. tiw i t.'SZ = G• �l/.A :.O a qr b 6 " DEC 131983 4-1`-- - ,• �oaT;�y� 3)7 r Se*.+ ZOO rii S.S 1 13 • 14 6'3 ftc4 .•. �*�. >s p" _) *4OCT lTeAGL A� 'l Myv1a1�NO)�2� 0•09 1.35114000�'1'Z �R 3�es • S'- I; I i V E.271 C 191c tjetttsirrr�r��i ci ju t;r�• Cam✓ �: y- al % i 1 u : No. 11421 11 A= 1 f r`ri �1014AL I'll,* • 4�r��a as�it•t OF 0 ,�. .. �.. sae.snoe a DEC 13 ► 8 ! �j s.eT 5 R OWAM a OWN no amm um will 1� g � -• eask�s s sy.ta..M ern sa�•�ar saw � e�sawt� eta..wt.0 s '°e n� also.Ma."n"Inc m N- •. � �,. ��fr,! +-SS)SS{{cc�r•r• ��_3','ACi� •�ti•! I A?,.�7'wm4.;NT '���.•.T 'I T• y'.• Xk 'l w {., r • [T, Y ' 1 f;i, �•°�. � '�^'S r ," -w.,� �. `,yam-•��.LL�' t.,,�i�' fl� Y.� t,K -,•�• ,lt:: •4�- �a ir`41s a � _ � 1_:�', '1 ,' r�*S"•,�•� �•' 'T � '�• �. �,•tia,�,� k f�.'.a -�`•s t�-:i f � :•^ -� a 'Y' r,Yi'i. �` I .. .{ r. :�✓ .1 a +. R a,1 T �X �RrS•� ! �r"•, ( Y- :�.t' °1]%�! #'"� " ,t • i - .',t' - "�.'• r�,`..i' �'��,�y~! 11�,+ .S i;`•i:'?1'�.s. �:f:r1,� �� !TR I�'►•fv•�i�I•i T'_ r J'(3.!r��.�._T�• ,ialy.y.,�1..� �'!e'..{,'•�(•?. A� ���� , �.''/`I ' 'yr�t�'• r��:ail l+: `i.i� . ,!'•• .A•..' �n r «. .�.- r•' s•.r j `•r { . k .+'-.� .. ..*,, r J! � '•{1 rise �+I';).Lfr`�.�+fS,����w?a �'..i, • it ' .- '�/t.M~w.( �,1 1 l' •'�Lh 1, .a A32S w ' 4w (4,2+Wk e y" At I WA 11-pr ' it 1�4�c9 M+L Fj,. C 144.s t31 .4 L A . (131 >�(%V-LV44, C•�14Cc'I �+►�' VSf� Iw �'►"�ZS 1J BOLTS �:. A` • ((p8.77 /1r-V44�t1,' i) s p.58'l(v .•. �`� sours ok ! ,l r c � T4 - 1•I '� - •cam • 11.131(a/9>�(i.iis�r:(i•a/�'' = I.�c�� Me -�I•Il+4�C 131��1•ZS��4 ��~k �, i r lc.114� y • L 9 �z�) = t.De7 use lye iL C -;•� =(t311/(zX 9)(1als') Ok. 'DY w 1�ssvr^1 N� —rwo-w�aY Fa c.�r 1 o NJ YeslL�, /•9' • o.8 9 35 7, .R . 34.'S g pz •�a•Ito P, - 1�•23` r ifi�iru�inur,��� ;. .f CL�C3�� y2 .o•••� of-coH� o,. 4 IF(,L-- • R Nu. 11421 ,i �• j� 4W 131 �(4)�I�. Z.��I� L �.L�,l.n o'K sT_n , ,v 0 ~.I�ESQ -.rrrll /�� `AL .i r Iw+awm r sou r' mn•lma ^ r' ,� 1(��C� sNT �v `w (� 1� SONSA l at Mid miftm r Im�t 1Or ISM DEC O%b m"m B E S T D E C K f b IQ a 22 Gag Grad "D" Deck c Fy = 50.00 ksi e t = Thickness d DIMENSIONS SECTION PROPERTY RESULTS -------------- -------------------------------- a = 0.257 in POSITIVE NEGATIVE b = 0.760 in I (x) = 0.8440 I (x) = 0.3665 c = 2.930 in d = 15.970 in x 0.6834 x = 1.6642 e = 3.000 in f = 1.020 in Smin = 0.3643 Smin = 0.2203 q = 0.750 in t = 0.030 in Area = 0.7367 Area = 0.3012 -------------- -------------------------------- POSITIVE BENDING _ ELEMENT W t W/t b eff h x a ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 0 . 257 2. 802 b 0.760 0.030 25.418 0.760 0 .030 2.915 c ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 2 .930 1.465 ' d 15.970 0.030 TENSION 15.970 0 . 030 0.015 e ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 3 . 000 1.500 f 1.020 0.030 34.114 0.972 0 .030 2.985 O ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 0 .750 2.625 NEGATIVE BENDING ELEMENT W t W/t b eff h x a ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 0. 257 2.802 b 0.760 0.030 TENSION 0.760 0 . 030 2.915 c ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 2. 930 1.465 d 15.970 0.030 534.114 1.355 0 .030 0.015 e ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 3 . 000 1. 500 f 1.020 0.030 TENSION 1.020 0 .030 2.985 q ---- ---- SHEAR 0.030 0 .750 2.625 MATERIAL: A446 Grade"D" Fy = 50 ksi -> Fb 0 .6Fy = 30.0 ksi 'sorlssfolo,y�� NOMINAL THICKNESS: t nom. = 0.0299 in. (22 Gage) •�'`��. °F ��!v,y ♦ c p S _ 14 Where _ y ' 253t I 55.3 I b eff --------- I 1 - ---------- I �A��.Iii,�i.3oil `a Fb" .5 I w/t Fb". 5 I `°� - 0122 iwunM at an OURS IL Htt K mwu SEC P' P (� ES u &MT 1 os 1 L »mi.c,III* anlw� FM wm nLu Diu trr� pla tl1-mll IL tuKul run A�i 1i♦iM srn a�-rui •�n a�•uw DEC•13 1933 Boa STANDARD 1 ,0/Zs Mo6�.. o►... Co�P. `` 2sa\S.c C_ dog x >/�l 23� Rl►Jc� , S►MPLacliC PLAMu l 40 CC►isy�E �M 4 $►� All. 4 �OT90 ex-f6r; c e oe) A 6 is 32� USE 14x'S� for Mew► e3 7� �� -��-?��'p°•�� l�/� 9° BH+ r /O SG i OW 1'10+� s SD,9411 eU*-L_ vjlrB M s I �►•Pr .4w s P.7's' R oha s - 3 co 4 b �•� Z9' e+ ~ 1 P& -Pw X-17 WS 1 9.940 g_C. 'Q-S .�- t /os� ♦ ,�aio 9��iG � r I*-rr vsF kl�L x 90 LA 7 84 Pb a (r31�8 ♦ 2�r�2 92V0 Rr►w` �j�T/�/�7 [�aS�o + 4 Sol = ( �4eR•� Mop - 9/ to 4 S. • • 0( Ado? 4 No. 11431 ►; t a_i ass t4� 3'n jd A,3 W7 ~v f9s��l,AL ,e •6 use C 0) �.aiau��► Mumma �q avail a OEM"ads ..• WON 76*1 .�..63/: (ss !4.Z7' T . �i¢s�t.sa • 44.��i hij . is C (s5)(4..sO(1s.o-N t %.,z ( i�.� + (z%.Ls)Lw')(► ) %. a 27J 3 87 40 -fT CL . �i (Z)l V.ss� • J 10oli t d r►� = 21.�9 x a:�ll.2�t7 • 14.V 1 b6161 Cow• .�r�+�i u PPclL Cowes cc-Moa 4-IL N-lit 81 Fb%4^4A W0,4 C,4.wJ4rcW7oN = !21.501 (�z>/(2)� ' ►�1.'1'` 1" A 30� � -r OIL tP y'' • I.o'► �b� 1'14 o k C Z� tact o IL AS IS F,ca��N G6 s1774 ar-Rr daq ys • A 37� ust s=G'w o k Vem 1.�►�s� a.-%o00 Rlas)lzjs)!?) 02=0 a s'.eo--! ?8-O~ 1. 8M '� •1 1►J 14 x to a 2. Con..r evrie.J 8M-(i (3) iO PI o• /i• Pf J►3o'T tr, �. Fo.�•sewTwa ZsaPrd► • ��•�+" .`� ���s° soy..c• i r a i No. 11421 P AL E144,��i�bc i nraw►�r�a _ rr~a w,ao� n..�.w. M MAN wwm DEC 13 1988 5 ?rr o _0� ale S_1cWZ1A Vzh� 9 ~ Co 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 OR•l:V� AREA CODE 203 644-2511 ,6 7, 7,91 M E M 0 R A N D U M January 19, 1989 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works RE: -Atlas Oil Company Engineering Review Please find enclosed the SEA engineering review for the subject application. Should you have any questions, please contact me. MJG/jsv cc: Engineering Department r PZC Correspondence — -- --- n C U 9 v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 8 February 1989 Atty. Frank E. Ahearn P. 0. Box 525 5 Oakland Road South Windsor, CT 06074 re: Appl . #88-105P Atlas Oil Company Site Plan 779 John Fitch Boulevard Gentlemen: We are pleased to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on February 7 , 1989 to approve the captioned application for a site plan of development in accordance with Drawings #1 - 3 dated 6/6/88 ( last revised 1/4/89 ) prepared by Alford Associates, Inc . and with the following modifications: 1 . Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff . 2 . No building permits will be issued until the final mylars have been filed in the Town Clerk' s Office. 3 . This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, including a bond in the amount of $5, 000 . 4 . An as-built plan is required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy per Section 4 . 13 . 10 of the Zoning Regulations . 5 . A landscape bond in the amount of $5, 000 is required and must be submitted prior to filing of mylars . 6 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 7 . Curb cuts on surrounding properties must be shown on key map. 8 . Front yard should reflect 50' provided on the Zoning Table. <°w M SC4( y r 07je Soum qd&,� o C U m 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, FEB. 11, 1989 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION At its Feb. 7 , 1989 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to take the following action: 1 . Approve, with modifications, Appl . #88-105P, Atlas Oil Company, Site Plan, property at 779 John Fitch Boulevard, GC Zone. Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 8th day of February, 1989 . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. , Chairman Marshall Montana, Secretary TOM OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE C�IANGE FOR SITE F- SUBDIVISION Gam: Site Name 779 John Fitch Blvd P & Z ID NUUber 88-105P Date 3-30-89 . Owner Atlas Oil Contractor Petroleum Contractors, Inc. , P.O. Box 549, Bloomfield CT. 0 6002 . Describe location and nature of change. Include plan/profile of change) * C�•iI1NGE. Relocation of under found storacre tanks from to northwest corner resentl rked "f il Reason for Change: (Why is change reVir ) ' We felt tank and 11 :g of both might create too much concentration of water around tank area. As it �� APPROVAIrS: ( Date. -34 Z� � > Danes Design Eng � � Dir. Public Wo Dane: Dir. P1 t Date: Owner Date: Other STAFF OAS: �R o f� lMe, CC: Deputy Town Engineer Zoning E�nfor Mmt Chief Building Official he atlas amil CO. 'JAe:t 289-6435 - 649-4595 249-8611 - 648-5853 414 TOLLAND STREET - P.O. BOX 8287 - EAST HARTFORD,CT 06108 June 26, 1989 Chairman Inland Wetlands/ Conservation Commission Town 100,E South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sir: On February 22 , 1989 The Atlas Oil posted a $5, 000 cash bond for work to be done at 779 John Fitch Boulevard. As we have been issued a Certificate of Occupancy and we are in fact, open we hereby request the return of this money. Respect f ul ly �ur R`i c a rd r JUN 27 1989 South Windsor INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY( CONSERVATION COMMISSION ��owN sf+t� ~ T Ole Saum ?t)&U&Ot C � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203 I'OSOR.�or1 644-2511/ July 11, 1989 Mr. Raymond Hallowell, Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Mr. Hallowell: re: Bonds At the July 10, 1989 meeting of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission, it was voted to release the following bonds: Application #88-105P, Atlas Oil (Route 5) $5000 .00 Very truly yours, ohn M. Moran, Jr. Chairm Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission JMMJr/pmm cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning t/ Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer owM sf,`� co C 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 v AREA CODE 203/644-2511 '1pSOR- July 27, 1989 Mr. Richard E. Kirkby The Atlas Oil Company 414 Tolland Street P.O. Box 8287 East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Mr. Kirkby: RE: Atlas Oil Route 5- $ 5,000 IWA/CC yp- Please be advised that the above referenced bond was released by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 25, 1989 meeting. Ve Truly Yours, ^' r Raymond F. Hallowell Chairman of Planning & Zoning Commission cc: IW /CC file arcia �-Banach, Director of Planning y1 .� r' he atlas owi ca. 289-6435 - 649-4595 249-8611 - 648-5853 414 TOLLAND STREET - P.O. BOX 8287 - EAST HARTFORD,CT 06108 FAX 282-7602 October 23, 1989 Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Town Of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Sir: On February 22 , 1989 The Atlas Oil posted a $5, 000 cash bond for landscaping work to be done at 779 John Fitch Boulevard. As we have been issued a Certificate of Occupancy and we are in fact, open we hereby request the return of this money. Respectfully ours, %r Ri and E. 'rkby [°�N seq � U Tio O-P s ?d&uaot 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 l��soe-CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511 15 November, 1989 Mr. Richard E. Kirkby Atlas Oil Co. P. 0. Box 8287 East Hartford, CT 06108 Dear Sir: re: Atlas Oil facility 779 John Fitch Boulevard This is to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on 14 November 1989 to release the $5,000 landscaping bond for the above-referenced project. Please contact the Planning Department office at the South Windsor Town Hall at 644-2511, Ext. 251 to arrange to pick up the bond. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Louise C. Evans Chairman cc: J. Iazzetta, Town Engineer M. Banach, Director of Planning PZC File pow" SE•, y r � T o � , 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ��°soe•co`'� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 3 May 1990 Mr. Sidney 0. Melius Convenient Petroleum P. 0. Box 18420 East Hartford, CT 06118-0420 Dear Mr. Melius: re: Convenient Petroleum $6,250 Road Improvement Site Bond This is to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on 1 May 1990 to release the above-referenced bond. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s ) will be available. Please call or write the Planning Department office at the South Windsor Town Hall ( [203] 644-2511, Ext. 251) to make these arrangements . Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Louise C. Evans Chairman cc: J. Iazzetta, Town Engineer —API. Banach, Director of Planning PZC File . - ' .,,• �#a:�:.,�-,'s++,,�'s�aJA. w: r ,�.lg .rA ''r`,»!i+` .s'"..�:x•,F:,p,�"'�':nafi:i TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: NiD- - CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON ,: f , j9 � r Phone No. Address Site Name - P&Z No, Owner_ 4 � #� 1 4� " Phone No. cl, Contractor Signature of Owners Date: r Signature of Design Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four /(4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) in Reason for Change: (Why is change required) /. APPROVALS: (As Required) t$A. Of Planning /.• Date: Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public Works Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: V. White - Town Engineer Yellow- Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod Engineering Department N/F LEONARb -�Eo FN N; N s N 7'42'-oo"E'er zoo 00 G6 Q Ql'4 t P'Clz y eL r' t ��,< Rt�ODOiatttt�ROrt `� �'✓ X I �s.`�4 ►Qw - a t3' , Z J P,at�Kt ►1;r Q �K P NI F'S rt<R \ Q 30 CD .,,,.,,G �: � � lit? 24,6 '�"^- �ckq ` 1� 5 t'iRiZT _ ALES s7 Lo ;-4 4c �► �: ,NAR t�.k i I A:>N I i F> 8;1 25A�ar jot ' I h Icy►--►-�:. � .. s 1 tj �j�l IGE i 5K f t�vcEY i t-ii?s :'v.�,l►.i,;. " rv �L �. A ht 3Q ©ice 4 F 1 SKY ,f2tCLKC M. borer-trt; w_A ._ J c� .t.t{ t� J R f J v r•� E "EtZ tAe,+,$ O ps1 q8 4, 'trr\ 4LG i RED J hF*+�1t kl �, G7 tall 13 c18 42 JvNtK c• ✓Nl i= l '' r c r�r 7 E pk �dRTH �A�?" • t 4, etC,2&141 NJgn14.SZ(ra�5' { 2 9 5'4