Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MASTER PLAN
�r V y TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR , CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM 2.co�'`� Application No. : /a0 P D rt - Date Received: a , ; Action/P by: �- R e c i p t N o. : t--� NOV 28 11988 Soy.,�� v�d�k�USo� APPLICANT: Inc Planning & Zcming Commission ADDRESS : 83 Gerber Road blest TELEPHONE.. 644-1551 ` OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS : Gerber Scientific, Inc. ADDRESS: Address COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Intersection of Route 194 - Sullivan Avenue and Kennedy Road ZONE: Industrial NAME, ADDRESS, & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: John L. Decker - 83 Gerber Road blest, South Windsor, CT 060$4 TELEPHONE: 644-1551 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR : (Check one of the following) 1 . Zone Change to (Public Hearing required) . 2. Subdivision . 3. Open Space Subdivision (Public Hearing required) . 4. Resubdivision (Public Hearing required) . 5. Sp cial Exception to Article (Public Hearing Required) . 6. Site Plan of Development. 7. Earth Filling [Section 101 and/or Earth Removal [Section 91 (Public Hearing Required) . 8. General Plan of Development. 9. Regulation Amendment : Zoning Subdivision _ XX 10. Other (explain in detail) : Site Development - Master Plan CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICATE WITH ALL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS REQUIRED ON ATTACHED CHECKLIST. App ant Owner ' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION, CONT' D. TIME FRAMES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS/PLANS 1 . All prospective applicants are urged to confer with Town Planning Department and Engineering Department staff prior to submission of any application to the Commission . 2. Plans are officially received only on the fourth Tuesday of each month at the Regular Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) . 3. Three ( 3) sets of blueprints are required on the second Tuesday of the month for review by the Town Planning and Engineering Departments . This deadline must be met if you want to ensure that your application is officially received by PZC. These plans must be submitted as complete plans -- which includes application plus all required information contained on checklist. No plans will be accepted at the counter if checklist is incomplete. It is the applicant ' s responsibility to ensure that all information required on the checklist is submitted in one package at the time of submission -- including landscaping plans, architectural elevations, traffic report , etc . Planning Department staff will not accept checklists with blank spaces , or with "by others" in any space. 4. Town staff will notify the applicant with any changes required to make the plans in complete compliance with our Zoning/Subdivision Regulations . 5. All changes requested must be made and new, complete blueprints must be submitted . At this time six sets of plans must be submitted . If a Public Hearing is required ( or optional but likely) then seven sets are required . 6. Planning Department/Engineering Department staff will review plans only once -- if the resubmissions are not complete/correct , the Town Planner ' s report will reflect that revisions were not made as requested . <O�M SEA( s �- South 12 2��� � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 soR•co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 24, 1988 John L. Decker 83 Gerber Rd. West South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Application #88-120, Gerber Scientific Master Plan Dear Mr. Decker: Attached is a copy of comments from the Planning and Engineering Departments regarding the above-referenced application. Please make the necessary revisions to the plans and submit 6 complete sets (including architectural elevations, landscaping plans , etc . ) to the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding the comments or the procedure, please contact me. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning cc: Town Engineer GERBER SCIENTIFIC MASTER PLAN - PLANNING DEPT. REVIEW 1 . Because of the large number of parking spaces, a peripheral road system which does not--require travel through an actual parking area is strongly recommended: (The only place where the present plan does not accomplish this is in the most southerly parking lot area. ) 2 . Provision for a second emergency entrance onto Sullivan Avenue is also strongly recommended. This could be accomplished through use of a gravel subbase with lawn cover unobstructed by plantings, adjacent to Building II . 3 . Traffic report indicates that the full expansion will result in addition of about 25 percent to a.m. peak hour westbound traffic, all turning left into the site. It appears that a method of assuring traffic management is required. 4 FUSS&OINBLU consulting engineers N1 November 29 1988 -., Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State of Connecticut Traffic Commission ' r P.O. Drawer A RECQYED 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, CT 06109 1j N u V U IS88 t' Re: Gerber Scientific, Inc. i Sullivan Avenue Offices *Tot Gom�slort South Windsor, Connecticut '3 Dear Mr. Stoeckert: For your review we are submitting eight (8) copies of the Certificate Application for the expansion of the Gerber Scientific, Inc. offices on Sullivan Avenue in the Town of South Windsor, Connecticut. J The following items have been included for your use in conducting _ this review: 1. Application for Certificate 2. Traffic Impact Study - November 22, 1988 3. Schematic Master Plan - Gerber Scientific, Inc. , rev. 10/18/88 4. Roadway Plan - Sullivan Avenue and Site Driveway, 11/88 5. Roadway Improvement Plan - Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue, 11/88 I If you require any additional information, please contact us at any time. Ver tr ly y urs, St hen F. Mitchell, P.E. Susan T. Smichenko Associate Transportation Engineer Director of Traffic Engineering SFM:STS:scm cc: John Decker Marcia Banach Gary K. Tyler 85-350 1007ATRF.7 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 64672469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS*SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES• SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 9 TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC*PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY ' STATE OF CONNECTICUT Coo S L2PIAP '` COMMISSION M ISS I0i~I c .. Penowe a er rti.1K��.. TRAFFIC O c«A,..%$"m e(Mew VekW)n Department of Transportation 24 Walcott HiII Road e P.O. Drawcr w Wethcrsteld. Connecticut 06109 Date November 29, 1988 APPLICATIOPI FOR CERTIFICATE In accordance with Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised, and State Traffic Commission regulations, a Certificate is hereby requested for: Name of Facility: ' Gerber Scientific, Inc. Location: Sullivan Avenue Town and Zip Number: South Windsor, Square Feet of. Gross Floor Area: 400,000 (97,700. exi sting) ONumber of- Parking Spaces: Start of Construction (Date) Fall _ 1989 f Opening Date: z Owner's Name Gerber Scientific,- Inc. Ownex I s Address: R1_Aprhar Road West Town, State & Zip Number Smith Wi ndenr_ ('1 06074 i Authorized Representative, to be contacted during review of application. f` . 1 Name: Stephen F. Mitchell , P.E. ,Fuss & O'Neill , Inc.- Address: 146 Hartford Road Town, State & Zip Number: Manchester T 06040 Phone:1"203- 646-2469 ` V Enclosed are eight (8) sets of the proposed development showing the information 'required. (see attached) SITE PLAN REQUIREHMS checklist to be included with application. r DECEIVED r: Nov owner's Representati ve z Stale7ra�cCommission - - �- 41 y STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS i TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation Commissioner of Public Safety Commissioner of Motor Vehicles ���, 24 Wolcott Hill Road i P.O. Drawer A ""`�► Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone � 566-5228 1 1 December 5, 1988 J Mr. Stephen F. Mitchell Associate Director of Traffic Engineering Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. ! 146 Hartford Road Manchester, CT 06040 Dear Mr. Mitchell: i Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor This is to acknowldege receipt of your November 29, 1988, Traffic Impact Report and Application for Certificate for the expansion to the Gerber Scientific, Inc. facility. As discussed with a representative of this office, additional data will be required prior to initiating a formal review of the application. That data should include traffic volume data for the Rye Street Business Park - Phase I and the John Fitch Industrial Center, as well as a classi- fication of the traffic volume data as described on page 2 of your report. In the interim, a copy of your submission will be forwarded to the Bureau of Highways' Office of Traffic for their information. Very truly yours, 9 William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Gerber Scientific, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer A Q � 0�N w ol" 49 cV �4�0 ~94s � SUL ,8~ ~ M ~ i ~8/0 w ♦ a 363y 8� p 816. 3�y o o R ERS ROAD O� o AY o y 1' �• in za z SITE QQ`� �� �, t "' s coV � � t �� � ,� ♦ SAND �-11�-L ROAD mac, t �,oPo t ,t Z L I-►6 i- r sc f v r FIGURE NO. v 2 O FUSS&O148LL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT REVISED 1991 A.M. EXTERNAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC qr SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT PRal-NO. 85-350 DATE:DEC.1988 SCALE: N.T S JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO 1 Q Q A O _ W 532 5 a vi ss 0 f-Z32 ~8�s i Sljt / /S y 804 ♦ 4 Vq N N sTy a M N ~ i ^ ~60 5� � Goo R 6/0 8 i L s 8 y968 y ! r* s ROAD M 0 °°o � � � �` pY ER Z � or ~ �► err. r rn LS tTE a�41 ��► 41 t "' izco ? s go NO o � t ♦ SANp N1L oPO �v + 4z 4 P � FIGURE NO. v FUSS&d NISILLC T I C U T v�. REVISED 1991 P.M. EXTERNAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT In in PROJ-MO. 8 5-350 DATE:DEC. 1988 SCALE: N.T.S. JOSEPH MERRITT&CO C cAj - sr 2Z � 01 N OM �494 N 449 8 S sue' 3 ss i V4N �8 S o i /O to to "sl loe;o 8y 8� c-i ss~ ao� R AYERS RpAD Z r z r i 2 �OF - SITE co C4;j O t ♦ SANG HALL .4 �t .9" ♦ 4 z L ,� ♦ t*6 r r •' FIGURE NO. v fFUSS&O'NIILL MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT v REVISED 1991 A.M. COMBINED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT in rROJ.NO. 85-350 DATE:DEC.1988 scALE N.T.S JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO • O Q O cr- oM Lys C3 _ 0 +M �255 0 45 860 i �V Ise 80,f ti qN � o �►6 �► lot.. r 4 s� m i i, 9 � 82,►ss i j � ! � h° !� AVERS ROAD N 10 y / N r i D SITE CL zz ? A / t QO �► ,� ♦ SpclD H1LL Rp AD � tv r► ,�O Q`�v v QO `9a k/ � z 6 ,�- .- so -# *J� 1 T* m r P� � � ♦ OD 7c FIGURE NO. v �� FUSS&OWEILL a� MANCHESTER. CONNECTICUT v�. REVISED 1991 R M. COMBINED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GERBER SCIENTIFIC SOUTH WINDSOR CONN ECTICUT in C4t�l I FROJ•NO. 85-350 DATE-DEC.1988 SCALE- N.T.S JOSEPH MERRITT 6 CO ' DATE PROJECT NO. • �� PREPARED DATE CHECKED . N BY BY e gigirieesrs F a8 $s"3 9-0 ►9 g A�M SHEET NO. �iv�� A��, Y�N�-lE'DY �AD�f / of Suu ,Z SUBJEcr. s DRaveWA`C to pa r�>em �iG WORKSHM FOR FOUR LEG oq s�ONS y HOURLY VOLUMES Gade.�•�6 STO j N-� N Yomoi=Vas Via V6 li N—Q N—(13 y' � Grade Q% y6 major road Grade_� 8 Vi�� ,.. •q p A p,.U�_u4C ' Y V, rr. —� Sop E r —Q V.,ye yo YIELD O Date of counts. ��road TuMT We �iVE pvrrage Running - PHF- Gra& voLUMEAMMUMM S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 Njovement Na S� Z51 9S 3 o 9 8 S►D � l2 O Volume(vph) 3 O Cv( 3 Q /O VoL(pcph)see TAk 104 9 2 v ulmEs LN PCPH Lo �3 NA 'Wit v»vN v NA vs v� Z NA v� —v= NA vs ja . r Y JV�: STEP 1:RT From Mir Strcet 1 ' . 1/2V3+V.—Vq 1/2 V6+Vs 2V`+Vs vo: Con Wing ma y` 6 + �- �3 � +-0— ova vph (�) �=��) C jdcai GaFk Te(Tsb�10-2) CPU_ —PAP►' potato Cap q.Cy.(Rg.10-3) cr+ C-`'t—=� (vIr/4u)X too Pereent of c,Utilized (v+�4+)X P - 9 a0 P+— '_ Impeda Eyctia.P(Fig-10-S) _ —,pcph C.12—Cot" �PcPh Actual Capacity.Cm CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO 't�l�1l..L= PREPARED DATEFUSS&O BY a it OOt'1SlJ�tlf19 eYlg j JA0 Av6 E ")4t4CbY RoaD/ ojq l moo �•N� SHEET NO. 5 Z of Z SUBJECT: S i?L ��'rV EWAY GOf�3i�ED T��IfF-,G y tEP LT From tb(a*street � ` Flows.Y� Vs�}-V2—Yc� `/6+Vs"VcI C + 5— 4-10 mph =+�= 81l0 "pt` S,�( ) SS(sec) Critical cap,Tj(rah 10-2) - 4 7-0 pcph —�e3o pcph cpl powttial Capacity.cr M&1�0-3) c.. g 0� (v,/C,1)X 100= Z � percent cf cp Utilized (V`/CO) = pl= Impedance Factor,P(Fig.10-5) P` _ .. (�PcPh c.,,=cp,= 42D pcph Actual Capacity,c,,, c� cp* • V I V11 EP ST 3:7'H From 1VCnoc Street 1 ` 1 2 VS+V4+V3+V2+V,=Vcll Conflicting Flows.V` 1/2 V2+v,+V6+Vs+V�=V� + 1O+ZS1+ 2�+ 55+h+ fo + +�-_�ph =�vph Critical cap.T.(rah 10-2) :7 S(mac) _ Pbtattial Capacity,cp(Fig.10-3) cvs— X 100= 96 (vl1/�pl l)X 100= % paves t of c.Utilized (vs/co) PII'— ftnpedartce Factor,P(116.10-5) pig= CM11=cvl t x P,X P. Actual Capacity,C. C.6=cps X P,X P4 _ X X X Qxph) X (pcph) V LVIO STEP 4:LT From bruin Street � ' Vd,(step 3)+Vs+Vq=VClo l"�Conf ,Y..s V VC.(�p3)+V„+V12=V`' S� vph �+ 8-0 -(rsedc Critical cap.T.(Tah 10-2) B-0 (sec) to= pcph .10-3) c 7_--�— _ ,a X P�X P,X Pa X P, P�otattial capacity,c,(erg p -c 7 X P,X P.X P„x P12 Cnso cp Actual CapadtY•� c 39 _ (00 x.C"X 31 =s_x A=?X b x 1.0 x .c*6(pcph) M X 1.0 X ° (pcph) SHARED-LANE CAPACITY MINOR STREET AMgt ACH M0VE VMWS 7,s,9 caftcph) „�csa _ v. LOS � v(pcph) �.,(Pcplt) 7 13 3 94 9 �1 s MEN=StREEr APPMACH bKWEME4TS lk n' 12� .,(pcpli) csK(PcPh) 4"csl+ v LOS r(pcph) c 10 O o0 11 G /0 300 MAIM STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 CR=(� — V LOS Mo�ne� v(pcph) C.(pcplt) 1 9 4Zo 4t1 ion 4%4 FUSS&O'Nt=tLL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC . oonsulting engineers BY BY SUBJECT: Ro JTV7 5 � ScJ LA-j v,A►J AVC- 99 A'M' SHEET NO. T AFi=1 G 1 of 3 Coo u l.A V Lu to IE ,t-� - ( - � --- - t-AID ;--- -- —;-- ,-------- --�-- --,------ --� - 49 -- — — —�—' -— �' _10! 3sro r1,00 4.,4: I AV 97. -- -- 00 4-94 1. 60 ---'- Ro Ln-67 -9_ I•�o Sri'---'--- ---� � � .-----__�.-- -. - 4 S9 186 Z. s, x !� x ' -:��•_�. �- -�x- �b ,c1-F4 ,c��yr_�c. .r =-. s- $AX-JmnoN SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET F L o W LANE GROUPS AD SIMENT FACPORS (D (2) OO E) Os © O O 0 0 0 0 Ad Appr. Cane Ideal Na of Lame Heavy Grade Pkg. Bus Area RightLeft Group Sat Lanes Width �kh bckagle Type Turn Turn Rate Movements Flow fee, E f f f f a (pcphgpl) N Table Tablea able Table Table Table (vph8) 9-5 9-6 9a 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 I.o 10 l.0 1.6 1-9 +s t t4- I boo Z ka .92) 1.o /.0 1.0 /.o , 4fo AO S4- 800 1 I.0 9 bo /.o by 1.0 bo 1( v S� 1 P)oa Z 1.0 CIO to /,0 l.0 /0 ,92 /.0 3 e8 1800 1 .a-:j- '90 1.6 h o 1-0 , 1.0 ,Cm2 /•o v �- 18aG 1 93 , 9 8 to 1. 1.0- 1.0 1.8s- to WL ""T (SOO 1 1.0 .CIS i.0 1110 1.0 1.0 /,o .8& ���� '�� PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. FUSSMm 1S t1,E r-4r em BY BY 0_3so 1 Z/to/803 19 91 A,Jy. SHEET NO. SUBJECT: Pavrr€ S. j= S v A�i of 3 :Z , i I . 1 •__• t • f f -• 3.CAP• L,ovN �mcA� L N E V , •--i-- LANE APT SAT. F �vc ci�o�P /C C-4ROUIF dFL-oW FLOW IRAnO 004 b 90 ,0 _. . .. _t �► z z69 34 j .3&3 .448 . StO 1 ` olio oZ•_ ,*)04 3 2Z lszz .o 14 ,3W � ree=s�cnoK 5 SZ( 7� . G�3 z4 .&1 3 534- 1Si SZ '� .39O S�Z oz L-4> S = Z7•80 �-o s D wW Ell* Seowd'krm Way VAd Way Los o f s.iewr p m m O _ O O O O O tie � ®. - AppL Lane w/c Ge"m Qyde Delay G06 CAvW Rath Ratio Guth de GroW Delay r%CkW Cc*W CcoW �y move- X a/C C (sec/v�eh) Capadtp (sa/veh) PF Delay LOS (sec/v�d4 We ( ) c T&W 9-u (sec/veh) Tilde ( x 9i 4 ,0 '05Z I ZO 41.34 a 0.01 41.3u �IC3 1 t o f 170 34.3 ?1"-?' 9.74 %o 3 .9Z 3 1, D •%4- ,2,7 17c 3 .oo 4513 A 3 4�,CIS E . 58 �l o .4 iZ0 zt.81 1 G �19 -J o iZo 0.00 .o 63� ,39C 1 t .2Z S94 0.00 to Zz '�- &t3 ,!� 1.0 9.lvo B v� z3� Fzj oZ ,39 o Z.� ►8 S�Z IZ , 1S •� D G LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 AND SULLIVAN AVENUE AM EXTERNAL ------ -----------------------------------------------------. ** I :I. VARIABLES * NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND --------------------------------------------------------------------------------*f +?� ;.YCLE LEtN6 i H C * f f 120.00 :2 .0l� ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f } # 45.20 } 45.20 *f ff NUMBER OF LANES N f f f 1.00 f 1.00 f* **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) * * { 29.00 f 534.0,0 ?�* ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) 22.00 { 57.00 {} **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) * f * 7.00 f 477.00 f* ** PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) * f f 1.00 * 0.89 *f ** OPPOSING LANES N(0) * f * 2.00 f 1.00 ** ** OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) * * * 756.00 f 22.00 ** ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTC) * * * 0.63 f 0.00 ** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*x **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** *f UuMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOIUND * EASTBOUND * WEST2'1,jN:, ** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------f* _* SAT FLOC( RATE, OPP S(op) * f * 3: 17r.00' * 1: f* FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f * *fpfo 6RN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f 20.19 f 44.27 ** '-RN SAT FACT f(s) * f * 0.40 * 0.86 ** 51C LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f 1.00 f 0.89 �# GRN BLOCKED 00 f f * 25.01 f ti.g7 ** ** p,o :N SHARE LN ?(T) f f f 0.00 ** :NTT'_AL Pilo 6RN g(f) f f f G,;',r } _.:v *# ** TH Z@,a :VALPNT E(L) f f f 2.60 f 1,31 ** ** L' FACTOR, SHARED f(a) f f f 0.25 * 0.86 ** ** LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.25 * P.ci ** *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** F & 0 PRru'UEC' NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 jmFUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO oormAting engineers BY BY SUBJECT: 20 OrE 5 S cj c-c_J,v A►.1 A VC- 19 9/ 0914. SHEET NO. stJGe.u�i t-1 sN eGv ci�1 T5 CO M i3l til ED T12AF�G 1 of 3 1 _�!►_ - x ----- -- Yowt�E VOL UM U, --t4 .56 1.0 p oo Z ?- K-413 �►- 1 3a�- .86 11 oa 4sa - ----- -- �- , .8& / O O 12& 1-4` 1 � Svc.Liv.4.1 f+►v c. !.U O 'K + ; 94 - ; ,- . F -,- 1 19& 1. 0 -{- 1 .- `- -y i ` -! t SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Flow LANE GROUPS AD STMF.NT FAC:'PDRB O OO OO O s0 O O O O 0 0 [0 Ade at Appr. Lane ideal No.of Lane Heavy Grade Pkg. Bus Area Wght t F� Group Sat Lanes Width VEh Blockage f Turn 111M Rat Mots Flow f„ f v f f f f fwT E a gx7hgpl) N -Table Table Table Table -Tablea (vphg) 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 941 9-12 11 oa I 1.0 ,9$ b o 11.0 1.0 to 1.o .9K -733 atg t /2)oo /.0 1.0 1.0 /.a /.0 I.D �sl 1000 I 1.o-- ,98 /.0 1.0 /.0 I.o .Od AO 1&04- (4. leco ! /.0 9 /.0 /.0 !.v /v /.0 14-0 Sb *4 /e)oo Z bo 090 to !.0 l.0 !•O . /.0 !o .4 o I o .90 1,o /.0 /•0 to .o .Z,& 4-1 ,90 1.6 1.o 1.0 to to '�- I boo .93 , 98 1,0 11,0 /,o 1,0 .8 S�' /.o 139 W8 I Boo 1.0 .9b l.a r.o 1. /to !.O 15' PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. BY 17,4 456 1191 AIM. SHEET NO. SUBJECT: 2O LTrF- s S v Lj��A J A 4 67 COOW ED Te—q Fl::�G z of 3 3.GAP, s SAT. FW VV CR1T1G4� U U'Ro P V t •- }-- 1. V / AD C DI I m�S Rip pKgs Ft.ow/ Fc.oW VjCnj> F1owf> C 41 43 os'b 90 689 .. _. . ✓ oZ $ �)s88 .. . �r Z 5&3 - -� TERSfGTO�.( 3-* 5 t3�4 •a .col 9 �- .588 - Zlo•s4 39°1 Coos .888[ .1 DE�.aY- � p Secmd arm ' is U06 o f scw+[ O m m O . O ODday Lane Lane � tmw v/t Cam C)de D&r D�aY P'r t O" Geoup Crow Ddq US Rado R&W, Ler%& d+ tA6 (.ec/ � Mae. X a/C C (sw/veh) C.aQ�r (sw/�) PF Dday Z,JAC 91 enenb� (� � Table 9-13 ( / ) ( X 94 4 o9 IZo 1. ,0 41.35 E . ' 08 1 t &51 1 170 . 3 !.low 27.02 D 34•Sa D r" 1:02.) .1 -�&,1& 4 170 .BZ.-q .4 1Zo ?,Z.93 3S Z.�!o Zo. _J .04•Z. .359 iZO 1& 1� 0,oo IG, C �' a .30A 1 (o0:7- 0.00 to ye 17-0 �. S lo.61 LO 36.12 D z1.40 G LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 AND SULLIVAN AVENUE AM COMBINED - INC. IMPROVEMENTS ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*f INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ** CYCLE LENGTH C f f f 120.00 f 120.00 ff ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f f * 45.30 f 45.30 *f *f NUMBER OF LANES N f f * 1.00 f 1.00 ** **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f f f 29.00 f 537.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE y(m) f f f 22.00 f 57.00 *f **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f * 7.00 * 480.00 ff f* PROPORTION Or LT P(LT) f f f 1.00 f 0.89 ff *f OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 2.00 f 1.00 ** *f OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 737.00 f 22.00 ff *f PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f f f 0.65 * 0.00 ff *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*f *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff *f COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ** *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff *f SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f * 3000.83 f 1800.00 ff *f FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) f f * 0.25 f 0.01 ff *fp/o SRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f * 20.98 f 44.38 ** ** LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f * * 0.41 f 0.96 ff *f p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f * * 1.00 f 0.89 ff ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(G) f * * 24.32 f 0.92 *f *f p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f * * 0.00 f 0.11 ff *f INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f * * 0.00 f 0.15 ** ff TH EBUIVALENT E(L) f * # 2.71 f 1.31 ** *f LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) f f * 0.26 f 0.86 ff *f LT FACTOR f(LT) f * * 0.26 f 0.86 ** ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*f F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 • PREPARED DATEtCKE.D DATE PROJECT NO, FV NEILL BY $s - dtir�g eng� /sg RoAD� �C)91 P.M SHEET NZ 'v�,-1 Avg. � �*��Y of 2 SUBJECT: Se>t.0 SiT�E �R.►vev�lA`� CoM3i rj I-RAFF1 WORIKS�iBB't'FOR��'LEG pMMSEcnONS - HOURLY vOWMES Grade�- S'FOP(� Z N=0 N YmDo vu vss vse 1 �ve�� N-• �vs_ 0 N_C v ra Grade-�Q_% cujor road Grade�'16 = v, 5utuj^VA AV�EtJV v=� -- -� v, lop ve v9 Mo Jl7_ Date of Counts: as — minoc Time Pci� road Average Running SPe�' v LUW(E A1011USTMENTS1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g 9 10 11 12 Mbvew.at No. 1 9b �3 1 4- sa O O Z Wunm a(vph) (03 sS O -A4 S o 13 voL(pcphL see Table 104 _ _ voumm a1 rcnt j= e NA vs:vss vse v NA vs ,:� v4 NA NA v, v7 ve v. � J "1_ RT 1/2v,+v,—vas: v� 1/2 v,+v.—v,, Z+ 6o`,�&008 vph can _3 +=-93� Cr fwd GRPr Te Clah 10-2) s ,� Pam' 4i= 4 pcph 3 potu tw Capacity,4(F+6.10-3) `r' X loo s��% (vs�4tj X 100 96 Impedance Factor P ft-10-5) Pe ��- 4Ms:-0 41:"�s Pam' Actual Capacity.C. COOT' . PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO FUSSM31MEILL . BY BY er-oneerscormj*v8S-33-Z) .s-�s m1&188 SUU_v,JA .I AVC E 4cN4"'( RDAD/ l °J91 P.M. SHEET NO. SUBJECT. TLf�FF G Z of 5 il- j>12iV e:WA,( Go M Bi 4ez V � V STEP I LT From Major Street s , Con9ictin Flows,V V3+V2 s Va Vs+Vs=V<< Critical Cap,Ti g&W-2) potential Capadty,cr tag-W-3) co pcph cr,__ '_pcp v x'00= -% (vt/C")X 100=— `� pent of c'utilized t ✓4J Impedance Factor.P(Fig.10-5) Ps" O- PI Sid Actual Capacity,C. c s-c�,. 2 pcph c.1=CPS= pcph STEP 3:TH From ATno'r Street I Vs t V" Conflicting Flows V 1/2 V=+Vt+V*+VS+V4-VA 1/2 s Vs+VI+V3+V2+VI=Vcll + fob+_1_._+ 4 =3._= 11 vph .=+ =f + + laSlvph sec _ Critical Gap Tc(Tah 10-2) ( ) potential Capacity,cr(Fig.10-3) crs=— cr" perm t of c,Utilized (v6/c,,j x 100 pit Impedance Factor P(Fig.10-5) Ps= = X P X P Actual Capacity,C. c„s=c's X P,X P. �,,=cv�1 ' ' X =_X X__(pcph) __X_(pcph) STEP 4:LT From Minor Street Vs LV10 Conflicting Flows.V� Vce(step P 3)+V11+ ,==VCs VcI I(step 3)+Vs+V,=V,o (4."+ 0 + !L =Ib5 vph Ilo +,_ � +LZfa 18� ,h Critical Gap,Tc Ctah 10-2) ( ) �-(sec) Potential Capacity,c*(r,&10-3) cps an 0 pcph c►10= o—PcPh cr,XP,XPIXP„XP,= cWto=41oXP4XPIXPsXP, Actual Capacity,c,� _ =9D X it X X.�sQ X —6-_ X 1-C X J2(pcph) 1 -1.0 x sx�x�n-LArrg c�rwcrrsr bW40R STREET APPROACH bKNEMMM 7•Sr 9 Movement v(Pcph) S.(Pcph) cu,(pcPh) cR=cs" - v LOS 7 5 BeF 8 O _ IZZ —182 F 9 ZA9 z-O F MOOR STREET APPRQACH M A'L u Movea>eft v(pcph) c,(pcph) cR=cs" - v LOS 10 a O 11 p 12 i3 4 S MAPR STREET LEFT TURNS t4 MoMmnent v(pcph) cw tp*) cR=cw- v LOS 1 ! .sue 54 A 4 3s' 2Co8 G ' PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC _. FUSS&O NEtLt_ moo consulting engineers BY BY �•3. rzMA6 20 E S 0 : t_v Y.h tiJ A VE-• P M SHEET NO SUBJECT . 1 °f 3 LAKE ' X - - - - J, - - I I ' YowauE Crito u i F ..olw 1 - -- -- --- S .90 Z. t 1 -- - - �- to, i .90 J.OQ y Z 381 .90 100 423 - - AV c- .90 �2 .CIO 1.oo SD 1--;•- ' - a �' . °° 53z 0 S9 _-' - d' 00 i� -- R ems 1 _ . 2. SKraR#noK SATURAMN FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 91.0w LANE GROUPS AD 0 O p p O 0) © O 4 O ® ®t it AdA t Appr. Lane Ideal Na of tin rea e Heavy Grade Pk& Bus A Ti Z eft Rat Croup Sat Lines Width Z mownle,tsle Table Flo,,,, f f f f f f f _mibw Table (P N �Pt'8Pl' 9 5 9-6 9-7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9.12 (��) /.o /.o /.0 bo t tr /2)oa Z /.o /.0 1.0 1.0 1•4 .94ly 1.0 4- e0 1 1.0 qfj !•o I10 1.0 /.v ,0 66 1500 z 1.0 ho I.o /.0 t 0 1.113 b 0 -� i o 1 , o .90 J,o 1.0 /•o toll,0 lab—+ .9e) 1z /.0 1.0 I,01.m to Ise '�-- tboo 109.3 . 9 .o t-0 1.0 W8 t SOO 1.0 /10 1.0 1.0 /.0 r • PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. ' BY BY 9S-35a SUBJECT: fzo v'r 5 S v /��..( A q 19�1 to, SHEET NO. • . . 3.UP LANE As ADZ: SAT. FVo v�/ cmc - q U+'to p C -;-- 1 sa RN F1PW FLOW RATID F�ows V/C 1 (O •42 ✓ •3SI 1 Z12 I.-zoo -�t�c �o� 4s4 34� 423 •IZI .1049 z2�3 .18CD T124 _ ._. .18°I 31 .3aS --a o49 .os3 ,l 7, ,z �i 31 1411 DEFY= 74: �.os F Seaoctid Drat 7btal is L06 o f s.trM[• O m m O . O O O O 4 Lane v/c ocen Cyde Detail Lane Delay fter llm Lane Lane AM Gold Ratio Ratio Lem& d, Gc*W d2 Ftcta GroP GroW V&Y us NWve- X S/C C (sm/veh) Cap cky (sec/veh) PF Ddsy LOS (w/veh) TAk ( c Table 9-13 (sec/veh) Table 9-L ( ) "X0 94 •) -? .osa lzo 41.z 90 o.00 41.3D �e 1f l.zoo , ,zo .1 ►�,z 108.& �z�.� F {V//✓ F Lot .19 1 . 1z1) .4 149. F 5 �l .lb& . 1Z0 to. 3 z 0-00 Z- 440 A' 9S:o1 F —�` .385- . 109 ►ZD 3z.3 Z Sir •Z7 ,/99 170 3 1.(oCoILI o.14- to 31.S I 3Z.38 D 170 1&.9& 749 I.o zo.9 C. W3 'r I• .189 12.0 Z&?- t 29.9 1.0 F ?Z3 F LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 AND SULLIVAN AVENUE PM EXTERNAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------f* 'INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND * SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff *f CYCLE LEN6TH C f f f 120.00 f 120.00 ff ff EFFECTIVE 6REEN 9 f f f 19.50 f 29.50 f* ff NUMBER OF LANES N f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f f f 109.00 f 319.00 ff *f MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f f f 80.00 f 61.00 *f **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f f 29.00 f 258.00 ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f f 1.00 f 0.81 ff f* OPPOSIN6 LANES N(0) f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff OPPOSIN6 FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 61.00 f 80.00 *f *f PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) * f f 0.81 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------f* ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ** COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND * SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND * WESTBOUND ff * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------f* ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f f 1390.84 f 1000.00 ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) * f f 0.04 f 0.04 f* **p/o 6RN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f 14.89 f 25.29 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f 0.84 f 0.83 ff f* p/a LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f 1.00 f 0.81 ff ff p/o 6RN BLOCKED g(q) f f f 4.61 f 4.21 ff ** p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f f 0.00 f 0.19 ff ff INITIAL p/o SRN g(f) * f f 0.00 f 0.46 ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f f 1.34 f 1.36 ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) f f * 0.77 f 0.80 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.77 f 0.80 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F t 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 a PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC _ FUSS&O [VE[LL BY c�or-oulting engineers BY es 3sa moo ,A0 SUBJECT: 20of 3 srC7 5 £ Sc�tv v.4 tit a vE �9 c)I R M. SHEET NO. E, X = A�SvsT�'b LAN - �ow►1E GRO U -- 'tl I S 9 I lot 4 Z 381 100. 423 : +�' .sLIw.i.4.1 AV C-. c 7z .o�p 1.06 - I at•i'�i p' 7- _ -_ . - s�o .� 1. oo (Czz 1 Rom s. r� - -, Soo 196 1.0 0 33� - - - f Z. s" YC.--.N X ,►�rX. ,�i - Sr1't� no� SATURAnON FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET WOW LANE GROUPS - AD FAChORS 2 p O OO © O O O' ® ® ® tide t. O jdeal Na of Lane Heavy Grade Pkg. Bus Area Right Left Flow pp� Group Sat. Lanes Width 'type Turn Turn Rate Movements Flow f I fHv , f E f f fiffE 8 (pcphgpl) N a able Ta-ble TibWTable a (vphg) 9-5 9-6 9-� 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 /.0 1.o l.o 1.6 .9 19 l boo Z /ro .9a 1.o /• 1.0 1.6 94& /, 345* 1.0 9 bo 1 /10 .0 1.a 1.O -993 1.v 3-03 J I o I , o .98 l,o I.o /•o to /,0 , 800 a 8-• .90 1.0 /.0 1.0 1.0 - l�0 1�+9 .13 , 98. 1.011,0 1•0 I.0 .S4�- /v i39 W61 (Soo 1 1.0 'CM i.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 /.0 .8o 1411 ��� PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NO. FUSSBY ccx-s t&v er4rlee�rs BY t IZ Ira uj;o **p���r� n •� . 1991 P M SHEET NO. S V W E l: f' o o- E S 5 V L.A► �r A J A r�� of CoM a► 3 Swum- L LAN t , 3•CA V4NE ADS: SAT. F�ow/ v ct,mcA cJ co�P /C saC-ARO pµAs L-DW FLOW RAT1� t=tows /C -t � �43 .oo ,050 'IXi �A�t:c•�CG��oA vac= i•LZ ��.r to �-s4# .42z ✓ . .1 .4 d� 2 t.Zt '�= 1.oeo . '• • �44- ZzSZo .i8S !io �r Z 4 35a3 ,t 2 I — J 7.1� • 3 90 !St 05- iq4- Z r��.sccroN t3 '0 4Z •sr4i . 8 DELAY= JOlo,lo� WL .Z (o .t°14- Z tS Cos = F Seamd�m 1cL06 Et' ® ®. Jwmmmmv�4I) m O . O O O�► tomm Ddap Lane °day' P=°e`'`atO" tine lane LOS/ F croup oe�►d, dsp Rah Rath vrh) Capadty► ts�/�) PFDday LA6 (sec/�1 Tabk r X / Tabk 9-13 (set/veh) Tam( ( t ) X 91 .o&� lZo 41•Z o 0•a �I �18 1t .ZI ►Zo 3 l� 119.40 o t3-. f4 F I.ZtS . IZo 33.�Z 12 � s8 �11 i8a . �zo �• Z .01 Z ,�4 P- toy.Z Ir --� ,3-4 194 1Zo 31,95 O 3Z 4 D L71 ,� � . . 82,45 ,SAI c I.O ZZ, C .Zls 104 tz.o 38.% z 147- .c� �et,o9 F ��• 5 F LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 AND SULLIVAN AVENUE PM COMBINED --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff * INPUT VARIABLES f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND } ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff } CYCLE LENGTH C } f f 120.00 f 120.00 ff ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f f f 20.00 f 20.00 ff ff NUMBER OF LANES N f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ++TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f f f 109.00 f 333.00 ff ff MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(s) f f f 80.00 f 61.00 ff **LEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) f f f 29.00 f 272.00 ff ff PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f f 1.00 f 0.82 ff ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f f 1.00 f 1.00 ff ff OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 61.00 f 80.00 ff ff PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) f f f 0.82 f 0.00 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff COMPUTATIONS f NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND f EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) f f f 1387.72 f 1800.00 ff ff FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(a) f f f 0.04 f 0.04 ff ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) f f f 15.40 f 15.35 ff ff LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f f 0.84 f 0.83 ff ff p/a LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f 1.00 f 0.82 ff ff p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f f f 4.60 f 4.65 ff ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f f f 0.00 f 0.18 ff ff INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) f f f 0.00 f 0.44 ff ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) f f f 1.34 f 1.36 ff ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(a) f f f 0.77 f 0.80 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) f f f 0.77 f 0.80 ff ff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F & 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 .� FIJSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT NC ••7 consLAting engineers BY BY 6 aS-3.sa SUBJECT: 120J1'E 5 1991 P SHEET NO. .rNc t.uDi t,JG sal?QcvEM er�5Ca4i3it4ez TeArr-i G 1 of 3 tit x --gDS�S 'ED ' Yow+�t,E GitO� LA m' Q s- i - - ' ,00 1,00 701- - - ,2• 1.00 �� •�o 1. co 6 ZZ, -I Soo' J.00 33 2. 1 Y. N X �M'X T*t -)L t 3 -X- *-1X- fib- a;. • ZT - S- - __ 5,�•+w4no�. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEE I F1.oM/ LANE GROUPS AD FAC'PORS - O :O OO O OO O O OO O 0 0 0 AV at. Appr. Lane Idea( Na of Lane Heavy Grade Pk& Bus Area Rift Left F Sat. Lanes Width Vhh 8bdcagerpe Turn ern Rate Mo� flow f„ f v f f f EE f f a (pcphgpl) N -Table a Table a a e a a e (� 9-5 9-6 9 7 9-8 9-9 9-10 9-11 9-12 �1 as 1.a ,9 0 1.0 !.0 /.0 1.0 11.o .9S" �7 13 boo Z 1.03 .9e) 1.0 /.0 1.0 bo 1 /.0 /,D 6s1 Soo I 1.o3- ,98 /.0 1.o /.0 110 .8 /•0 1&04- ( . 1,0 Gl /'0 1,0 1,0 C) .Q 0 9500 /<o� S8 'i� 1 boa Z 1.D /.a 1,0 l.a 10 .99 /•0 3 D --� I o ( o .90 1.0 /•O /•0 l.0 I•o .:V ,zzz- .90 1.6 /.D 1.O 1.0 to 1579 '�- I boo ,9-3 , 9 .o !. I•o. I.0 1.8s- /.o 139 W$ I o0 1 1.0 .98 to 1.o 1.0 1,0 /.O .W 1411 PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT'NO. 2 ma OOf'1S�t1[lg eY1C�lri�f^5 BY � BY �--3Sa iZLUSS SUBJECT': Qo v S S �'A�••� A J C 99 I A M• SHEET NO. Co i � ° 3 3.CI�P. LANE APT SAT. F�ovN cmc NE v C�koup I sK Rovp PNAs Ft..atn/ ��oW RA1'1� RO'^'s C a�ca C 29�v .8�o (�'' fio 1(oOQ- /3Z9 ✓ ,Z9(v 4 .I1Z ' .98 �r 1 Z 4-Z3 35a3 ,t ;X s . 3 J . d /7.t Z _ �.LZOn l - . ^� 3 80 157 1 OS '7,1 Z TER.S T101.1 -3 5 (e ZZ 13`'A' Z DeL-A,Y- 3 33 t o t .23Co 1-0 5 = SeeoM 'Zbtal 1cL06 - ' LAM Lane App` Lane r/e. Cwren Cede De4�► L.ne �r °�'d2 rector �� C,�P � USC W Ratio U4 � � Monte- X a/C C (sec/vieh) G"dtp (sec/veh) PF Delay LoS (sec/v6) Table sneerb� ( a Table 9-13 (sec/veh) Table 91 ( ) "X4D 94 .o tzo 41.29 0.00 41.3o E 06 t t .bo 170 30.32 1001 6,09 94 29.94 D n.30 9- 1.t 1 zizo 33(0 4757 •90 94.0)3 F t.i 13 a tzo of Z &35- .51 9y. 93 5 'e'1l .193 6 1 ZO .Z -V 8 0-01 3Z SI ZS Q (0 3•Z4- i —�` 44 . IZo 3o.54 7-59 0.33 1.030•S� 1� To- . 7-46 .?.t i Z9.8 3M o.o 10 3o.49' D ISS' 13.Ti- 8 Z4- -Z-79 1.0 /G,S& C IZ-o DZ•3 .o Ir9.4o F 5Z'4Z � r LEFT TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR WORKSHEET ROUTE 5 AND SULLIVAN AVENUE PM COMBINED - INC. IMPROVEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff }} INPUT VARIABLES * NORTHBOUND f SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUND f WESTBOUND ---------------------------------------------------------------------- *} CYCLE LENGTH C } # i20.00 * 120.00, * ff EFFECTIVE GREEN g f 23.60 23.60 ff NUMBER OF LANES N * { 1.00 f 1.00 }} **TOTAL APP. FLOW RATE v(a) f f 109.00 } 333.00 } }� MAINLINE FLOW RATE v(e) f 80.00 * 61.00 } *fLEFT TURN FLOW RATE v(LT) } f 29.00 -(Z V, �* ** PROPORTION OF LT P(LT) f f f 1.00 * 0.82 ** ff OPPOSING LANES N(0) f f * 1.00 f .,00 ** f* OPPOSING FLOW RATE v(0) f f f 61.00 f BO.00 ** f* PROP LT IN OPP VOL P(LTO) * * f 0.82 f 0,0i; f# *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*+ **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------f* f* COMPUTATIONS * NORTHBOUND * SOUTHBOUND * EASTBOUilii,'? * WESTBOUNDl *f--------------------------------------------------------------------------------** ff SAT FLOW RATE, OPP S(op) * * f 1387.72 * i80{).O0 *} *f FLOW RATIO, OPP Y(o) * f f 0.04 f ** ffp/o GRN NOT BLOCKED g(u) * f f 19.17 f 19,12 *f f* LEFT TURN SAT FACT f(s) f f * 0.84 f 0.83 f* ** p/o LT IN SHARE LN P(L) f f f 1.00 * 0.82- p/o GRN BLOCKED g(q) f * f 4.43 f 4.48 ?�* ff p/o TH IN SHARE LN P(T) f * * 0.00 * ).15 ff INITIAL p/o GRN g(f) * * f 0.00 ff TH EQUIVALENT E(L) * f * 1.34 * 1.36 * ff LT FACTOR, SHARED f(m) * * * 0.77 f 0.00 ff ff LT FACTOR f(LT) * f * 0.77 f 0.80 ** **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ff F k 0 PROJECT NUMBER 85 - 350 SHEET 3 OF 3 RECEIVED - - 0 DEC 20 1988 FUSS&Q'NBLU SO. 11INDSOR PLANNING DEPL consulting engineers December 16, 1988 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State Traffic Commission P. O. Drawer A Wethersfield, CT 06109 Re: Gerber Scientific Town of South Windsor Dear Mr. Stoeckert: We are writing in response to your letter of December 5, 1988 requesting additional data in order to initiate your review of the Certificate Application -for the expansion to the Gerber Scientific, Inc. facility. Eight (8) copies of the following items are provided for your use: 1. Revised 1991 A.M. (P.M. ) External Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 2. Revised 1991 A.M. (P.M. ) Combined Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 3. Revised Capacity Analyses Worksheets a. Route 5 & Sullivan Avenue b. Sullivan Avenue & Site Drive/Kennedy Road 4. Roadway Improvement Plan - Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue, revised 12/6/88 The revised volume plates include the traffic volumes for the Rye Street Business Park - Phase I and the John Fitch Industrial Center. The intersections shown are those significantly impacted by these two developments and were therefore reanalyzed as part of this submission. Intersection capacity analyses at these intersections indicate that the conclusions reached in the original report will remain unchanged. However, the intersection of Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue will continue to operate over capacity with the proposed improvement in place. It is not evident how this intersection could be further improved. In addition, it was brought to our attention that the proposed improvement on Route 5 at Sullivan Avenue might not be feasible due to the location of a historical structure at the southeast corner. We are currently investigating this matter with the Town and the property owners; we will inform your office if we find that this improvement cannot be built. At this time, we are submitting a revised plan for this intersection to include the improvements by other developers (with our proposal, as well) . 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY �O Mr. William W. Stoeckert December 16, 1988 Page -2- The other development traffic as described on page 2 of our report includes developments that were not occupied In order to account when nt or volumes impact, the generated the traffic counts were complemes• from these developments were added to the projected traffic counts to produce the peak hour external traffic volumes. We trust that the information included herein is sufficient for you to begin your review. If you require any additional information, please contact us at any time. Very truly yours, Susan Smichenko Transportation Engineer SFM:scm cc: John Decker Marcia Banach Chief Gary K. Tyler 85-350 1214DTRF.8 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation Commissioner of Public Safety Commissioner of Motor Vehicles �. �,,0 24 Wolcott Hill Road • •P.O. Drawer A -� "Mumma Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone: 566-5228 December 19, 1988 Mr. Stephen F. Mitchell Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester CT 06040 Re: STC# 132-8812-01 j Dear Mr. Mitchell: Subject: Certificate Application Gerber Scientific, .Inc. Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor The Application for Certificate and supporting data submitted pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised, is being reviewed by the Department of Transportation. You will be advised by this office if additional information is required. Upon completion of the review, a report will be prepared for presentation to the State Traffic Commission. The owner, town officials and you will -be advised of the subsequent action of the State Traffic Commission. Very truly yours, William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Gerber Scientific, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer S E A Consultants In . Engineers/Architects January 3, 1989 Principals Arnold B.Goldstein,PE. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. Frederick G.Aufiero,P.E. Director of Public Works Robert M.Brandon,A.I.A. Town of South Windsor Stephen H.Geribo,P.E. David T.Goodemote,PE. 1540 Sullivan Avenue Bruce E.Soule,P.E. South Windsor, CT 06074 Kenneth M.Stewart,P.E. Anthony J.Zuena,P.E. Re: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Associates Job No. 88126.47 Steven L.Bernstein,P.E. Paul F.Gabri I,PE. Task Order No. 47 Mark Gould,P.E. Michael S.Schultz,P.E. Dear Mr. Gantick: Arthur A.Spruch,P.E. Paul C.Ross,P.E. As requested, S E A Consultants Inc. has reviewed the following for the above referenced project: Sheet No. Title Prepared By Date 1 of 4 Key Map Fuss & O'Neill 1/27/88 2 of 4 Site Boundary 1/9/88 Survey 3 of 4 Schematic Master Plan 10/7/88 4 of 4 Schematic Master Plan 10/7/88 --- Storm Drainage Calcu- 10/88 lations Y --- Traffic Impact Report 11/29/88 This information was reviewed for compliance with the Town of South Windsor Subdivision and Zoning Regulations dated July 24, 1972 and standard engineering practice. We note the following: Section 4.13.1.1 FORM AND CONTENT OF PRELIMINARY PLANS 1. Preliminary architectural elevations and renderings of the proposed buildings should be submitted for review. Section 4.13.2.1 KEY MAP a. The data block indicates impervious coverage of buildings only. In addition, the coverage should include all impervious surfaces including walks and parking areas. Also, 850 Silas Deane Highway the allowable maximum coverage should be revised in Wethersfield,CT 06109-3412 (203)721-7993 accordance with the Town's values. 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,MA 02139-4018 (617)497-7800 Citicorp Park West 100 Foden Road South Portland,ME 04106-2319 (207)775-2281 c LS SEA Consultants Inc. Mr. Michael J. Gantick; P.E. Engine rs/Architects January 3, 1989 Page Two GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Elevations for existing and proposed contours within the proposed de ention basin should be labeled on the plans. A, 2. The OQQplans should indicate what impact, if any, proposed building #IV will have on the existing drainage pipe and manhole. 3. An emergency spillway should be provided for the proposed detention basin. The spillway locations should be directed toward the existing pond. 4. Existing and proposed hydrological conditions for the existing pond should be submitted for review. S. Calculations for drainage structures #17, #17A and #17B should be provided in the storm sewer system design. 6. Appropriate rip-rap protection should be provided at all drainage outlets. ' 7. The following proposed drainage pipes appear to be inadequate based upon capacities and actual discharges: C.B. #6 to #7 C.B. #10 to #11 C.B. #20 to #21 C.B. #23 to #28 C.B. #31 to E.W. #33 However, headwater values should be provided with final storm sewer system design calculations in order to accurately evaluate pipe capacities. 8. Handicapped parking spaces should be designated on the plans and in the data block. 9. The plans appear to contain two different limits of inland wetlands. A legend should be provided designating each and other items contained on the plans i Kr."foo 04tr 40 j fivrer S E A Consultants Inc. Engineers/Archit cts Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. January 3, 1989 Page Three 10. The Traffic Impact Report indicates that "signalization does not appear to be warranted" at the Sullivan Avenue and Site Drive/Kennedy Road intersection. The report includes plans of limited roadway improvements at Sullivan Avenue and Site Drive and also at Sullivan Avenue and Route 5. However, because of an anticipated decline in levels of services during the P.M. peak hours and continued development within the vicinity of the site, it is recommended that signalization be provided prior to full development of the site. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, S E A Consultants nc. John T. Holland JTH:ap As"�%s •r O FVSSUMBLL consulting engineers January 9, 1989 Mr. Leon Schweir 59 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Route 5 Improvements Dear Mr. Schweir: I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation of January 5, 1989 concerning the subject improvement. You informed me that it has been your observation that the southeast corner of Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue is a dangerous location due to an inadequate turning radius for WB-50 trucks. In addition, the location of a 48-inch tree at this corner is such that it has been hit numerous times by the trucks. The proposed improvement would decrease the turning radius which would further aggravate the existing problem. It is our understanding that the removal of this tree would impact your house and property, and therefore, would require a take on your land. It is beyond the scope of this development to undertake this improvement under those conditions. At this time, we intend to withdraw this plan from the Gerber application. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Susan T. Smichenko Transportation Engineer STS:smc cc: William W. Stoeckert Marcia Banach r/ Gary K. Tyler John Decker 85-350 0106ATRF. 10 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER" CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC•PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY Jira@ FUSS&O NEILL consulting engineers January 9, 1989 Mr. Leon Schweir 59 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: Route 5 Improvements Dear Mr. Schweir: I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation of January 5, 1989 concerning the subject improvement. You informed me that it has been your observation that the southeast corner of Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue is a dangerous location due to an inadequate turning radius for WB-50 trucks. In addition, the location of a 48-inch tree at this corner is such that it has been hit numerous times by the trucks. The proposed improvement would decrease the turning radius which would further aggravate the existing problem. It is our understanding that the removal of this tree would impact your house and property, and therefore, would require a take on your land. It is beyond the scope of this development to undertake this improvement under those conditions. At this time, we intend to withdraw this plan from the Gerber application. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, 4 C�-J, Susan T. Smichenko Transportation Engineer STS:smc cc: William W. Stoeckert ✓ Marcia Banach Gary K. Tyler John Decker 85-350 0106ATRF. 10 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES•SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 9 TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC 9 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY 1 i 0 FUSS&O'NEILL consulting engineers January 11, 1989 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State Traffic Commission Department of Transportation P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, CT 06109 Re: STC #132-8812-1 Gerber Scientific, Inc. South Windsor, CT Dear Mr. Stoeckert: Enclosed is a letter which details my conversation with Mr. Leon Schweir, the property owner at the southeast corner of the intersection Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue (Route 194) . As discussed with Patrick Bush of the Traffic Division, we intend to withdraw the plan for this improvement due to the fact that it is beyond the scope of this project. If you have any questions, please contact us at any time. Very truly yours, c..c Susan T. Smichenko STS:smc cc: John Decker Marcia Banach Chief Gary K. Tyler RECEA 85-350 BAN 12 1989 O110ATRF.9 Sa Tr�ic Commission 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 S E '.I:.NA E",JP-%T a ..n5 7_ P—E I S N .,iN I ;I s ,.,T C r.,T EMS L`::—Y :n AiJE.,f r. E'.1 _AriNi'.i ALE '.1HNr-(JE,1E' i STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation commissioner of Public Safety p ✓ p ow Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road - P.O. Drawer A A"" : Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone : 566-5228 January 13, 1989 Mr. Stephen F. Mitchell Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester CT 06040 Re: STC# 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. Mitchell: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor This is in reference to the January 11, 1989 letter and enclosure from Ms. Susan T. Smichenko, indicating that the proposed improvement to the southeast corner of Route 5 and 194 (Sullivan Avenue) is to be withdrawn. I am forwarding a copy of her letter and enclosure to the Bureau of Highways' Office of Traffic Engineering for inclusion in their ongoing review of the subject facility. Very truly yours, 01 William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Ms. Marcia Banach An Equal Opportunity Employer owN 8E4<Ca O � U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 4r��sOe•Co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 January 20, 1989 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works /epr RE: Engineering Review Gerber Scientific Sullivan Avenue Please find attached, the SEA engineering review for the subject application. In addition, the following comments are noteworthy: 1 . Details as to materials of construction needed for driveway/parking lot, drainage pipes and structures, sanitary pipes and structures, detention basins, parking island, etc. 2 . Site circulation appears to be restrictive, especially for truck traffic accessing dock areas . 3 . As this site is within the flow path of a larger drainage area, it is important that provisions for future drainage easements and/or piping be part of this plan so as to not "block" upstream drainage. 4 . Per the SCS Soil Survey, soil conditions for the site are unsuitable for road fill and subgrade and there is a seasonally high groundwater table. The plans have not adressed these conditions as they relate to site development. Concern as to the effect of the high groundwater on the function of the proposed detention basin should be addressed also. 5 . Limits of construction are needed. 6 . The intense development of the non-wetland areas may cause maintenance problems during snow removal operations, i.e. where will snow be placed to allow for designated parking. Should you have any questions regarding the above comments please contact me. °wGft" cry`�` Chief of Police 9 k, South• �� Windsor �oSaR.co� Police Services SOUTH WINDSOR POLICE DEPARTMENT Planning & Zoning COmmissiOn CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Project Title: 88-117 P Date: 1-25-89 I" 1. Developer is responsible for the purchase and installation of all street and traffic signs. Any signs on or intersecting with a State Highway must be cleared through the Department of Trans- portation. All signs must be in place before a c.o. is issued. 2. Developer is responsible for the purchase of all street lighting through Connecticut Light and Power. CUP will install all lighting once they have received payment from the developer and the locations of the lights has been reviewed by the Police Department. All lighting must be in place before a c.o. is issued. 3. Developer will submit three (3) 831 x 11 or 831 by 14 maps of the proposed project to the Police Department for the purpose of identifying and locating all signs. Completed maps will be distributed to the developer, Town Planner and the Police Department. Any changes in road design will require new maps. / 4. Temporary street signs must be in place as soon as possible and maintained throughout the project. 5. Emergency phone numbers for the duration of the construction must be provided to the Police Department on a company letter- head. If the developer occupies or owns the building/s after construction emergency numbers must be provided to the Police Department. 6. All buildings located on property which abutts a public highway must be numbered. Such number/s (address) shall be visible from the street. All numbering shall comply with Town Ordinance 6-800 thru 6-802. Barns, garages and outbuilding which are located on the same premises as a numbered structure are excluded. 7- Install 250 Watt Sodium light on SNETCO#857. 8- Widen Sullivan Ave. on the north side from Kennedy Road east to SNETCO Pole #862. Note# see attached map. 9- Re-line Sullivan Ave. on the west bound side, for turning west bound traffic. Note # see attached map. 151 Sand Hill Road • South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 • (203) 644-2551 -2- CONSTRUCTION SUGGESTIONS I. Keep all shrubbery low around doors and windows so as to allow an unrestricted view. 52,00" 2 . Locate business name, if applicable, on the building. Q' 3 . Backlight business name and address . 4 . Provide lights over all doors. dS . Provide ample lighting of parking areas. 6 . Advise the new owner / purchaser to provide the Police Department with emergency numbers . (Business, Commercial and Industrial property only) . I ♦ �Qom"` SIGNATURE Sergeant Thomas C. Hart #1 Traffic Servix Un Approved r'• Project Title: 88-117 P Date: January 25, 1989 South Windsor Police Department Sergeant Thomas C. Hart #103 Not to Scale f SULLIVAN AVE. LEFT TURN ONLY SNETCO#862 S 90#857_ Kennedy Road PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERML FORM TO: Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead, Fred Shaw, Richard J. Sartor, Gary Tyler, Fire Marshall Lanning, Jim Snow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:#_ge- 1 ) r1 j> Zone 3 Acreage 14 9. 1 Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial_ Location: cled Project Description: 1 ,,, q00, a-0 sj _1/ Future Town-owned property involved? Yesig No (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments Please let me know by 3'�?, if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. PLANNING DEPARTMMiT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORK TO: Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead, Fred Shaw, Richard J. Sartor, Gary Tyler, Fire Mar Lanning, Jim Snow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# Zone 3 Acreage �• Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial_ Location: - Ae 6t�'btm 0'f'4� J4,~ led Project Description: - y00 _ cTuo Future Town-owned property involved? Yeses No (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments P1 ase let me know by /�3`' ?q if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department wh n I do a Planning Department report. O �- vL C � �,�Wi I I t N✓t/� ` � ' ,/�Tj/'�f���C7�"/ i`"IK?-Le-t� �Q ra-o u,.r�� 72iZr� I PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead, Fred Shaw, Richard J. Sartor, Gary Tyler, Fire Marshall Lanning, Jim Snow FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project:# - 7 Zone 1 Acreage L4 1. q Mao& Pl� Subdivision Site Plan Residential No. of Lots/units Commercial Industrial_ Location: Project Description: „� lipo Future Town-owned property involved? Yes No (a)new streets (existing frontage also) (b)new open space/recreation area active passive (c)new detention area Planning Department comments LZ4 L Please let me know b if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. MEMBERS STATE OF C O N N E C T I C U T Commissioner of Transportation - TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Public Safety R E'tisEe1 VL3r10'B�ticks Department of Transportation �► GG..LLB 24 Wolcott Hill Road • Y.O. Drawer A �� B Q i 1989 Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 FACILITIES MANAGER February 21 1989 Mr. Stephen F. Mitchell Fuss & O'Neill 146 Hartford Road ` Manchester CT 06040 Re STC# 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. Mitchell: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor As a result of the review of the Application for Certificate, the enclosed comments detail the additional data required in order for the review to be continued. Seven (7) copies of the data should be forwarded to this office. Should the data not be received within 120 days of the receipt of this request, it will be assumed that the project is not going forward. As a result the review of the application will be cancelled at that time. Should you have any questions with regard to the requested data, you may contact Mr. William A. Peace at 566-5120. Very truly yours, William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler . Mr. Thomas D'Auria '� Gerber Scientific Phone: MAJOR TRAFFIC GENERATOR REVIEW OF SUBMITTED DATA GERBER SCIENTIFIC ROUTE 194 - TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STC NO. 132-8812-01 The Office of Traffic Engineering has completed the review of the submitted data and has the following comments: 1 . Analysis of the site generated traffic indicates that an exclusive left turn lane, for west bound Route 194 at the site drive, is warranted. A minimum length of 200 feet with appropriate taper is recommended. 2. With the addition of site generated traffic, the Peak Hour Volume Warrant for signaliZation will be met. Due to the fact that this is the only warrant that is met the Office of Traffic Engineering does not recommend the installation of a traffic control signal at this time. However, it will be recommended to the State Traffic Commission that if a signal does become necessary, due to site generated traffic, the developer will be responsible for the installation. 3 . To offset the impact of the widening of Route 194 by the developer and in anticipation of future improvements (it is expected that - Route 194 will develop into a four lane roadway) , it will be recommended that the developer deed 15 feet of right-of-way to the State where his property abuts the existing Route 194 right-of-way line. 4. The site generated traffic will have an impact on the U. S. Route 5 Route 194 intersection. As discussed, the developers recommended improvements for this intersection are not feasible at this time due to right-of-way constraints. Therefore it will be recommended that the developer equitably participate in any future project to make similar improvements to this intersection. 5. The site generated traffic will have an impact on the traffic operations at the intersection of Routes 30, 74,. 194 and Buckland Road. Therefore it will be recommended that the -developer equitably participate in the funding of any future improvements to this intersection. 6. This development will increase the traffic volume at the Route 194- Peirce Road intersection by 15% to 17%. This increase will have an impact on the capacity and level of service of this intersection. Consequently improvements should be made to offset the developments impact. Analysis shows that with the addition of two lane approaches for east bound Route 194 and Peirce Road and revision to signal timing will return this intersection to an acceptable level of service. 7 . All proposed and relocated signs and pavement markings should be tied drawn to fixed objects. Also the sign numbers listed on the sign legend should conform to the State numbering system (eg. 30" STOP 31-0002) N '(Ow 5 r+( O �I l C U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 l��sue•co" AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 6, 1989 Mr. John L. Decker 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor, CT 06074 re: Application #88-a , Gerber Scientific - Master Plan Dear Mr. Decker: Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission, at its February 21 , 1989 meeting, reviewed the above-noted master plan and offers the following observations and concerns: 1. The front portion of the site, which contains the majority of the "buildable" area (area not within regulated wetlands) , has a high degree of impervious coverage. The Commission would prefer to see the intensity of impervious coverage reduced. 2 . -The front-, setback of building II is in close proximity to Sullivan Avenue. It is highly probable that Sullivan Avenue will be widened in the future, which will result in an appearance that the building is extremely close to the road. The Commission would prefer to see greater building setback. 3 . It appears that a parking space has been provided for every anticipated employee (about 1000 employees) . The increasing congestion of South Windsor, s roadways makes it highly prudent that an employer of Gerber' s magnitude. considez vehicle reduction prograir►s such as vanpooling and flex-time. Such vehicle reduction programs would aid in the resolution of intensity of development as noted in concern #l. 4 . Proposed landscaping appears to be in character with existing landscaping, but is inconsistent with the level of landscaping Vn ich Planning & Zoning is currently requiring. Careful attention should be given to upgrading the proposed landscaping so that the buildings are as enhanced by the landscaping as possible. 5 . Army Corps of Engineers/Inland Wetlands Agency acceptance of detention basin location needs to be determined before submission of an application. Mr. John Decker -2- March 6, 1989 The Planning and Zoning Commission looks forward to Gerber' s presentation of a site plan which addresses the above concerns as well as the technical concerns noted by Town Staff . Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION b Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman .J ` RE ^� R .t •. ' 0- 13 APR 05 1989 April 4, 1989 FACILITIES MANAGER ` er oonsultmg g � 1'leel"S Mr. John Decker ` -Gerber Scientific Inc. ' 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor, CT 06074 RE: Sullivan Ave Drainage Dear Mr. Decker: As discussed at our meeting of March 31, 1989, I have computed total flows leaving the site using the existing pond with a new detention basin outside of the wetland area. The new detention basin will connect to the existing pond so they act as a single detention facilit y. The peak flows leaving the site will be less than existing flows. This scheme will take the flow from the north of Sullivan Ave as Y> prescribed by the State Department of Trans P Transportation and combine W It with the site drainage. The pipe connecting the pond with the new basin should be 54 inches. Following is a table showing peak flows leaving the site. `s Attached is a plan showing the revised construction. Pk- STORM a. PROPOSED EXISTING Q ELEV. 0 ELEV. i 1 Yr. 44 cfs 70.4 49 70.8 10 Yr. 71 73.1 102 74.0 � - 25 Yr. 97 74.0 145 74.4 50 Yr. 149, 74.5 194 74.9 100 Yr. 189 74.9 234 75.4 Computer Run #4 covering the combined detention facilities is enclosed. k Very truly yours, 'A G enn J. Mirtl Associate /Pjg enclosure 85-350 Corres. 0404A89GJM 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 �Or1N at,4 U 7_0�� �Scw� ?d&U&10t C � 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 l��soR•co- AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 6, '19 8 9 Mr. John L. Decke 83 Gerber Road W st South Windsor, 06074 re: Application #88-120P, rber Scientific - Master Plan Dear Mr. Decke Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission, at its February 21, 1989 meeting, reviewed the above-noted master plan and offers the following observations and concerns: 1. The front portion of the site, which contains the majority of the "buildable" area (area not within regulated wetlands) , has a high degree of impervious coverage. The Commission would prefer to s the intensity of impervious coverage reduced. 2 . The front setback of building II is in close proximity to Sullivan Avenue. It is highly probable that Sullivan Avenue will be widened in the future, which will result in an appearance that the building is extremely close to the road. The Commission would prefer to see greater building setback. 3 . It appears that a parking space has been provided for every anticipated employee (about 1000 employees) . The increasing congestion of South Windsor, s roadways makes it highly prudent that an employer of Gerber's magnitude consider vehicle reduction programs such as vanpooling and flex-time. Such vehicle reduction programs would aid in the resolution of intensity of development as noted in concern #1. 4 . Proposed landscaping appears to be in character with existing landscaping, but is inconsistent with the level of landscaping which Planning & Zoning is currently requiring. Careful attention should be given to upgrading the proposed landscaping so that the buildings are as enhanced by the landscaping as possible. 5 . Army Corps of Engineers/Inland Wetlands Agency acceptance of detention basin location needs to be determined before submission of an application. Mr. John Decker -2- March 61 1989 The Planning and Zoning Commission looks forward to Gerber's presentation of a site plan which addresses the above concerns as well as the technical concerns noted by Town Staff . Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman R �► - S��.�..1�A1 Avg& �r--' pfwasrh kruGL�wmevT Co&pv"-rab RouU �t `il , -Y _.�... is 'sS'A i 1 720 XrQ, 0=-01-59 O?.2: ,.EER �:T� _'.vQ'� -tit .r,''.!yt"t z5 3�l i ^}=" L iF,V c 07183 ?; PAGE s Yyr„r• r �n�7 rr4!� •-[C(p}1't}+►� •ti7+st._ .t ! T• n ' ( - a n..i," ff[�._l� 1:/ _, ' :Af�1..vim vu�'�1 Lim f�C'1*1.aLi'X _•w�:�.� �V 1� tkar. .�u����4T - s•� �.lu v rn7 tR _ r rn,.r,r 1.� ft T! iL A 'i T• n� ,.•; r► yynrnT�n{ 1 -n nT •,nTt 'I�L.�*l t/ .J 1.. _l- �.. uL ,S., L _ \ _.r _ �lJ TV flo _yJ �[_L•,La a _ t .:b `} r(J 1 :N �I<• iA ��r'-- .l_ �5�!'E �.r{- J?t:�� v,t- 4 �^a• _�� ?�•J�_���ST - t)'l ~L'J�V _ rn Ten 1.1 ryr� n n nT n Tn,•T R nnr nr nra- ry • t T 1{ r C'UR :- TP nr n nr T•R to Ant, -ti S !": ?�;! Ri: Dc- :,u��i_ 5Z. _ E , YNTERNAL RYMERAD4 Tl!,E lNCRMNT_ .0227 '-`IRS P*LAK Tt:IE(HRS) PEAK D•SC• �r (nn) r r, T• Ir_`Tt - .2,16 'RLRJfF? R:V^_= 'JC_iIME ABOVE 3ASEr`.n.W = 2.51 ��r-RE =f :tiC :5; :r.9i 1.65 Au?=-= E'; AASEF�D _ .On CAS DPEWS—ON RESVDR ST%CIURE I ,I- T y{y�s r� �}�� T ityR Rnn t, �1 PYYROERAPP= S LCuTpu MYDRMRA?M= r SURFACE ELEVATIM 7:.00 PEA! TIMEMRS) PEAK D,SC►'ARGE(%FS) pEA►; ELcVAT?iN(c_Er; <<.5z2 4.57 73,90 RUR1FF VOLUME ABOVE BASEfLDW = 7.61 iIAIERS cD :RC =S, I.4.9! C;S- RS, 1.64 ACRt-F**',; BASEF'CW = .00 CFS 1PERAT.rh RUNS F CROSS SEC ION t OUTPUT '►iYDRDiRAPL?= 5 4 c Ay tV S9 m,•: 7L 1PUT; RtN Gfr rv„L,:n!1 Y F>._ w/ TT tSMP n>.` .k7c6RA'- 4YDaOIRAPH TIME INCRtII=N = a0227 . ni.r.r�{vI-�l r•r'.n7 T•LinJ�"_- .r� F',L'1ti./+rry+ c A Tf Ir ^r •nn `Jv�, - �r rs r„wrTn /- _ PEAK ..`!_f�sRS) =A Dec,. _._-J, = f: Vk _3N',FEF-? ,1 T r-� ,r.-N— - .6 31._! K _ c'. r12 ABOVE 2.34 44--R3J1E! V.Z. �^1[}f.-*ny- ;.1".-r nnnni ern-+n`• 1117 17 i20 iEs, P-'0,1189 0' s:2ii JL^ynaa��G.1 k1 ` _•VIt.k •6; ,yTiJ1 rr na(� �rw a % ..,. ln� � t REV PC 09/63 t.2: _ PAIR ,R • t�'[�^ rl� nf+ y. •`];tom t••i,n�_ _ s` •L�_ tYa �L T- .�1, a. R.i�a. *I_��V— 'Lt T� � J' J��..f'`T�iT,\�1= 7Z ,R "{y _'S'R�i i`Y',�7wrt•r 'Vr `fy'.I-1�!'_�T_ t.I.1/. r',r)rt" ,„ _ra.L.1 �a h� _-4_1►y JyR1♦i1{1^� J 'tt�r �w>•1t^ A. VL BA. ,..: - ^� L(�ThL; TLl1 ��n�tY1 �� ��� ^ 1 nR-_•' -T ^P_. �l1{ _ _fLV 1T. - �. V L V} -al�� -}._�yn�L �t.:� �J�_ '__ i ~V�- -^•• - ltn ~r.^I OPERATION RUNOFF 'CROSS SECTION 5 t OLTNT ►±YDROS AN= 3 4r�cA= .02 s9 "': 'N ail�� , _ .r' �'. L_ ti%+'i.�R= i.. ``•:L•K� -G INTERNAL tYOAU:RAPF TTEE "NCRE?'NT- WARN_No 4.14 TIME .OGRE"ENT MAY BE TUC' Pr-AK( ^ ;,IT = r,^^w 4 •Yl+h �' YY, n r.n n t IPT^ :;,y cO�P�TEn _AK( ��.71 y..., �. zs_ 'Ink _ _xa�_�s ��.xa ¢u_.,�_�� �R:,sR�?� �.O�D.h^,; ��r ,�..��• J T / ran PEAK EVAT I IN(PEP .its ::v--R3G^i! LI n,�y,{. AREA :•^ J_L7�.i':v t v.I V-1 f fvr K L - a !� ,tQ ' r Ji t1.• ,:•= .vw _ f :ar; ,") 16 ?C lz R, n•a Jt�•_ �.%a11 t+..{r i._ � •_�. t��. a�J �1 !y y' ,�� ^� �.�r. , i a rVc sv...r c 3 ` r 1 RTrn,rn • ice. a�fi • I - ,vv ,v�L a I a 4 a 4� yy r r r: • t � ! r,v� NCH t E? .64 ,65: ,66 .9; r 95 ;i ,;, .,c lf t�f. � 1l1ti1rr 1116 L,t'? -,\I� S _ •. +,lJ �.a t- Y _ y- i,a f 5 9.010 2_3GI".0 .,i.+ _t LI .1L4) ._iL ♦:4-7 .. i4= L? i f�• �,6; - ,.'4t; rr1 ry.nn� _� �h Alz SI L ti L:_•e a:etil\• Urv�L.s iai:� l?a:'.L J■.i ZsrjL 4a7l' ?t�rt r3 as, 4 LitG1, y(-_ i171 •.. _ ,J~ ..,_? {,r�, -a_L Qs L+ •E� �s�J Lc a.a__ L t•_.. a f r n { rr <• ,;t� ,5�`nrrrra n 1R . , - - LL La a•L a_ _�•, molar'.,'': i.e•%a_ — -L _�1:� is Ln _ _ —n . an . ^_� M.H7 , , n 6 1'. at J La J J _a.._ _,L_ -_ L i L .I� . -L • • •'1! �- • • .aY, M1 i.' 19_T' i].:.-.vA 'v_ iF 61. Cr` -�Y n„�;t�� ,I •-ki .a= _ ^ r '_"i-.^,- _� 7 nY�n -_� r.Sy r.L. ^ 9r'•��-. ►'• 11♦♦��^�� '� _ n AnVf/ - iL Yeti _ ,.YY► p•_ V J_ _-� L, ri..r^._J a,J _ C _ •/ _ _ ~"iJ _..J LJ'.._ ��t�j L`lL..: _uA _ • v J�cz � - .K=►,GG 1.-IT•r]. I r� ARI,fan —1'1T, L 6—R - _ rn_ vn•.n- T`f7w1 _ n .a vA Zia rV '.Y_ t _ _-'�� , 1•'� ._�- r.ry r'�S T:��1ti{i� J.Q ^.�,Pf�j f��•1". 1'q•, r• - Il��w ♦/`!-�• , "I " .� •��� n:rfn.-i%rria:n; �f 1.;�� �rnl r:"�r���7,' - .0 0 nR:R-1` VI UrE A►vLVE By HF!_.nA ..q Trr^w_`.t� • I- nEF:L4. G?LRAT•QN ADDHYD >,OSS S_7N15 r �± +h' '-NPUT WYtBRGSRArBS= 213 Cjj7pU i �YD;CSRAPH= PEAK T!"E(HRS) PEAK D'S;ARS-rrFS'• P;off -VAT:CN(rcCTI 12.72 41.35 k,N:, L? 23 98 - c. (tiuIL1 ,C,f 24.44 2.17 RUNUr VOLUME AB ONE BASEF-U = 1,45 WA,TERSHEC 'htiRES, 122,98 1F2 =,S, 10.16 ACRE-FEETS SASE L N _ .0 CTS OPERAT M ADDHY8 CUSS ScC'I4N i INPUT PYAROGRANT= 1,4 OUTPUT gYnJRCSRA?r= 2 ' PER D1S4HARGE(C S, v. ,:L_1 12.64 36,9p tii`_L 23.98 4.06 -_ -�ri t c-;' - _ . 41 T nn•.f-^ r •,^�` a �n :n` •, nn r�T n-�f n,• n n . :`.,-..,�1 - .i1 .i�•,._..! - 4:-- �`''- 4 "�. � ^1v•.. -_ , _ -,:�f - r�'� .aF`J G�4A 'i�.��-�`u� -•.a;; . ._n y,nF n of .- _.,•.rrn�.-_F+. 17 �` ,- ' A (({���{{ +� r • t nrn�rn �. A r ww •y+�:f� n` ?� LV� 1 FASS 'w� � XL� C�v-4.-89 Q�i�. :,.'f.�1 �„�r LLL..��^'� '4'. .��:'� r REV 7-r,09l831.2. n/•y nrr n`I�y jynn - wRnr,r.�,!_ 1 [� A+-nn-.=n .IP rn n�• n i[,w+1 y-p : n nrr;n e VIL ME RO4�V� C-sa=':. �:? r!r:--u •�[u i:",.� jFa_.iR , i Y' �J•Y-�rrl /,�J_F- �CC ^•� 1�1i / 4 J4' rLR Y'L C�ERAj IDR ADuHYD ROSS 7 ♦''•• °IT 1 ^ry nn ^+Ih- i IG�nI:T nnn► { r PEV a lY�.ii �•�J�CUJ+iQ-"�- � u�v r_ �V'►«;,_.,�Q^-= :' 1 r 6,a22. h 1. .,+ {�7t , r n +!!1 .. / � w,rR w+•_` ^ w _,nn f` _r � �n /n. - RUNUFF VU_UNt APONE BA5EcLOW — 1.6r �iA ERbFEID Ld.�d 4[c "K�y ,�� ��{E .c� �raE�_; — .44 rs: DrERV'ON. RESVOR `rR;;CTURE 'KpUT HYDRQSRAPU.= 2 OUTPUT PYDROGRAPR= 7 ON,tFACE ELEVATION= 67,30 #' PEAK t lMEt RSi ��4� ant .�'i�-*fn�_�'♦�ci PER *I'EVA710I.IF"'" L. J V Lr ♦ S 3 2 24.:9 3.94 67.5f E s 4 w An�r�D1 ,44 ny F514_,re VnI L E AEGVI SASUtJW '_,67 I. ' �4,5� Fn—rR n Aa Ura e'+-- tXc,,;T.{�- .3!4TRCL uF'tRA'�C'� 1JJ � "��P�1TA-_,�v� ,.3'"r��r'::► ^K rQ� _ RECORD .D t. j,. Pc �s:}J X Y vsJ vV w,:a' • `ASV '•:_`1 "C 091 3 R 21 r AEA 5 • CY rn•.•....T �r�(Tp'! '1��"'1T••1 nn�+yr- rr,A r"T+n a n nTr,} T•,nr � vti."1',!{�l_ L `�- � +v'f: ~'1 SJ� A�`:v'a.r� v .`)"I�u' "!` .l li'{� it R 1 • r +, -•r• n "R� '" f n r• I ^ n - • T R nT n n S'.RnTIbf: ti��t = 4• "tr -� = w �,S RA_+. DI ,..�_ _ ►;A:� as Z F�,. �r•-_ ���= a A'TER4AT_ btu,^ W-7,x V" y`'`j- S;;tTPtiT ""tYDRC7,ApH- 6 n A + nor 1�r R� r vc= t+ •-7 n -rT t wRywnh�t n.• �•�t+ +�R. �� }T^ n„� e:ni•r}n - wr, R r rrr 1 f „ rw 1 rn �n q r.`n -,n n /-r ne�aar r rT nanr�r '�•��,`• R��:'1E ABOVE .1��Ftf � 4 nc TC, r urn •_r:e?� _.rJ-�'v arb� rv11i-� ' iv` ^, - t rC OPERATION RESVIR CTRiCTURP P {J +}fl L r� ;t SURFACE ELrVAT T-N= .i.t:D R AK,/ T• r n `, q1�f n+n{�sr nr R r r='}i .��f�� % a• Jie~aL��N,7�'.CrS: - :i.62 r+4: _._. ei�y}err r.r�� ^'P! _ •'7� 11���pJAAT�-'�'^R r�'-� RU;Lrr �L�L'1 _ ABOVE EASE-_ui� - 4._. (�?i L�J�`�ir :�s. .00 i+ r7 IREA^ .�„3 V;f Ai -�T �. �__ _i hV:- Ef = _- � t G ��= t_� .. .rRE s /� t 1 1lr_ 1NTERNA n Rr,R4nr■ r, 4. r + n�r =FTC tinR� rn��S : V4�il•s'1''s _ _[.1.� _�'- s�r.'_a!� IJ PEAK 7lME'%wRc'!lf .b 1��•r•g1,'^1r.- 91•r�` awn ` � -- r�•p _ Cn i -'S`:.rR -♦ _` - ,�_.� L _ nn__ ___ ..4.,-- �•r� � n f+r_n li'•L�~ �_:.til.� i_�L «�i�r.•J7f 4i v'Y #f� -'�.1�.r.�i _'`n�_t.t _ _ -_, _r .. _r_ .. .�--__Yi �r�•_ _ if - r�ry .i i t yT-ry r.Ir}rr� nnnnn -n--r.+ � 67 FC n r _ 1.777 �R70 M £4-01-89 08i211 354 111P ` PASS tir__ , P" 09/93 t,2) PASE 6 JFt v.lti.ii- { 4I M.v RLlTPi!' „Y�rROSRAP�= AREA= 04 Aa = DI,'T ?y n�c'P CJ VET S. T.! J^ U�C_�Tr P =, i - NTERWAI QYDROERAPti '7TM- ''%�t�'�; T— .'_{'C-'.� 11t.73 24.31 dRUN DF�) t R Y`;�1't JuY i.'Qv E'LL- — 2.v' •SU ,_ _.! a�tv^,zl y'?a .,'u'� and ,lav: )kE—r ErR .rr.T; tl'1S'�i,.5 LaERA''ON tUWF CROSS E_E't^v MTPJT rYDROGRAPH= 3 AREA=Q 1 f} i�jRT R! _ Q • ^ ' w Rr'(T T• _ :�i l!'�R a 2 C� �a 1�r N•T R'UNFF tatJR�-- /8, �� _ , rU�LL :���aJ — • 4 {'J_n'I :NiE.RNA' HYDRO&RA-' *:ME T Ri `,��_ '33 =3:;RS �� iaARh!RG—l�AiM Ti.E :NCRPENT MY BE TOC LARGE, 1 t •n ♦ , R— R R , `0 FETED PEAK ",?s) e? XSE: T'nUN 5 -Xui*3S NAX, ADJAH-NT PYDRO5RADr PEAK Ti#Ei'R3j' ����� �.3 14.4 z-_ll,r^`.' PEAK -,.t'�AIIONtc:�T'r f?,1465 44.33 (RUNOFF) -. 1� _ Sll•C 1i�J'•t.�. TImII�r>n1 `•nn �{ D — 1, r!, f n— T . R,• w • ww a� _..,r;�; anvT �4Y.�R✓GRA►r T. � ::�;;RS -T�: ,,vc^zMF = w' P- '' _ '� ►"4- ,.4 ,� DR a NAGS AREA .Oc npA ( 1'Gr Al 4,n � 05 1 4 .16 � It L . D ISCH6 IN IL ,j18 .��� ,'+b .3b ?3 .34 = _,,.•. 3,44 JISC46 .'j5 ,40 .55 .47 4.0� D SCN6 143 .�9 a6E a67 .68 :. .47 .64 :'7C .71 3, " DISC!S .72 .73 .73 ,7� :�3 ,7- .76 ,76 .77 177 5:0r? LiCCu6 .78 >7S .7 I9Q f"Cr .4 >5i .1�} �n}ff Q ( a j} e a J1SL :, U .1,G7 ia;7 ;a,V 'e a�% •r L c,66 1. Y :.67 :,6 :,7" 7. 7` �p ,t — fi.Vi' i11Sv~C a.a 3� Lail. ?>i�C _.25 r 7- _,�t• iI'? �,6 �r:7S / ❑❑ it�ii•J v':Jv~�� 2.6�J �.�a La 4� xa.n „? ;s J� -.�.L4 ?a Ti �✓ t &.32 '7 L.64 �,; L._= -,.. ',_ :3,35 >43 3gIz "?.:'� �5F5� ct:33 4-,36 . ,.,r :IiCu'w,?i: Cx 26 .''? ,7•x�►L t r••� y Ta Lf - - -- - =-6 — n LL RL �••. v^ _ _ r.; s .+ram. Y� r r•. J--f w ^' it,'L,mu— +nw�'• rT; './ )'ja n r Iw. n�R►'arR • y,�, ..y a•r I�r,r am �__- ZCt.. e+� - - • w P�� ()•.J �u-L...L� +"1 ={J«� �_T� u�• -`rr ��r L'] L Ass li TL-i - •J I-. s. V --•1I - 1 _- __ _. R:-v ^r OWS31.?i PASE 7 �• wf rnn,• r.nRr ` _ Ls ,(Jk n Tr't1--•( rw -n n� --r - n R nnlr- -T r.Rnr i - r nrn ? _a., _., •��"k_. ,.`l.�' �� ti�aJ �t~v �.._ -- ,'".•!17r�r'�71r — r l,`!M ,,. .TAR {{fA nRf!r ry •�` • r`��+•� _ ,nrw n,nn C rl rr �r I( (y T'• I'M- B46EF'r!,r - n n hTr•. n:.r(I T •Ir•w r1 • n-n y r f L yR�r -r T ►. n`� nl - +�15 ?+T Ur.� uv4} 1`I,�Cr-viY Lt�1rfi:�L-i~Lu .kL�YJI 7.4 ,$ �L1->_ Q1 ,'Jf �'_ _ r CELL •-J - _ +��r a • A �f r•n rn r^�Tn 1 � • 1 (?7 YBR f+ 7 w,fTflt:T Jw .1 r1 nllPEA r I T. 17.85 ].ts M A x 0 n���1-r _ en- -r-rrT� ZjA C-rl st•e - 0 w'- _x+v. !' �•J4.(J � �LiVt. �'`I��r�� "- _.�1 X� J"-. .�.1Its '236- 3'�i s .. ,'�v>) ��,_v �� � r.,,r�r:,.�i� - •1J41 v~ _ rJ«TT►Trn 1 ry R wr;,�n nrRT.n n T �T w a r,�• ! nr tIT Rnnnly R =4!K 7?M� •I{ n4 R� �T l•'. ..`�', �._parr,_ J1t..a 1,J= -t`���-•, - .., v _r �lfl __a .r _-_-___ r_'a'- - ---1 �v= 1 :� M1 . ,+ T 7+: -t; +r Ar}a'+ nr nC 7CA �n s nh ".?2G I(_v ..4- 89 0Si2: �ERAER r1I H 6�._.vA�► A'vt ;Jnr;. Ant PASS 2 , . tizro. REv ?!640 091831 2r "A6c B Tf G/Arjgi �r��rl �TVy4 C'+ (•1A—�/1\i�rrrTl ., ayi.i•++ J Cli` '' 'l-��C _. fY7'` - tF fit++ 22.33 24 n0 ,. •r� rY - 24.36 5.57 ;Nj L + w. n 1 1 w•+ n n ^.nr r A `r Banr U 11 A R�4CFF V_;.!irE A$CvE SA�EF�G� _ ?.�� *A;ERSI�ED II�L�E�, 379iSE C��-,;ai ?..?9 P�3E-�_t' D btF-U9F = . �r 5 OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 7 INPUT �rYDRJ6RAPHS= BUT""T HYDRGGRAP^ = 2 = PEAK TINE(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE,4ES1 PE AIR' ELEVATION(FEET) 12.21 1796 �n ,:E r Ufr1 22.00 6.73 _4•�13r 14.00 1 IV,.15E t !_-r RUNr?- VOLUME ABOVE BAS=F_"N - 7./!'!r "LTtnSHED X E- c12 t 2L � S-'�"Rc, 3A■n. �V�c }c_ . r F c i' 1 INPt,I? 'RYDRCSRAPH= 2 CUTPDT "uR Cm CRASH= � SURFACE =LEVAT'tiY= A7.7 PEAKRr +�yr r++r} wrJf/ 1•An1+L1�f;r l�`-`1 DCJ!` .11. Ei"KS1 4_F'1* Urvv:�,••4'vi 4v' _ y. i4.2t 6i63 67.76 r t 1� S'. � i- r —r+ 7 17 TTnn+rn 'INC• rrr r. n n T f'!� 1`P'1r i"rTa r.�Lrw +Sl+ — 00 PY-n R.�NOFr VC�r�!i� ..ECV- �AScr�C - +_�5i�r� _ LHESi �+__iD4 �F:1-!�nS; :�i`... " t_ C�.t-_,r�i - :IJv ��� � + � +r n rsn n .-+r r-rn �IEGJTxVt u?'TROL CPERflT;tt cND��" ;O�! U'q._� S �3P_tlrL �_n +t •�"rn ' !y7 �_/�ly � nr wrw rs..-ea w:,, - r r • sy w.r n� 7�: rwn � —dryry: .`/ {�JE;2L ��R:�:� s_ r ��___v�� ��h �Ra_�L,� _-t a PASS � a€ RE rz"I" : f^ rre�f S1 Tarr ' �X:.Lv -V_ �.i�'.Ci:l� L� e��''ta':>:X C �? T• !� T,y�-_ . P�►T.. = n n -}. w ,r�T,n.• �. .r�r +rsr ern = ■ T �n.`T nr.,.„ n �rDlR;. .'.�L - ,l),. ;Aj N u. ^Yr��T�/{ /.1\i/S'� j•Ir non `:n-,J r 1J M Ri111 L�J4'. V�•� i n T e rr.,.T ] nr- 7r„M1 L- G T•Y_ nr -n ,y- rip- •.�,_ n �n„r�i �J�[ S1: .�r:. lL�� � iru 7rf_- T_r . ,fir , '-',f'.'R -R rxr �inn1 •n;�^,� PEAK *11(E'NRS) s:, :2.16 24.02 ,ME A ^ [ rr�l n:. = a� s•■Tr M1ns • n..-n �' r+-n T n:• M1nr - s nr N - A r nzn ,. lr?�E AR,:U: C'��:�,;•.�t �..� �t'a+ �'�.^C� .�_ i _°ii..� � _ �; .+•_ Y, '� 'Q_CF�_,V .4�• (1FGrtaT:GN RESVOR STRUCTURE • S �11'rP �i_ nt,Twi'�T .r nn ^, � - t PUTT HYDRI GGRAP 6 T-1 r. -drRNORa-h= , O-ACE El .h�e �PEAK1_�4Ed,RSf ?_t'� iS '4Rtc!�ra' A- 12.64 5.61 RUNF 'VOWIE ABOVEE SAH LrW = d,6q �ATERS�ED :NC�i_S, S=�BA � = G=5 P RT•.04 ►n 1 -RCS" . n wrn T n s 2 tvcui�u • . i7 oJ; HvDRDS;A! ARrh f)3 Cn kT 'NP"T ',�1n►C n.lp idc_ vc T•4= �: �..atn=S,r�1�-•n l_ .� ..nl:�n DEAK T1r'!%:;RS1 t }I. LL.b,J 1 24e,02 RU �11__i t_'M V L-_ , " It !- �r� r: u_. _..'rl ..,.. rh• �-`s•. _... t- __S _ � _ _ _ _ _ -_ y�ii._ -!� 1 .. nnrn -+SS *,s. err r.-a•1(•e Srn-,r, - �A■{ At A RrRP.r,a •71 lL;1 1 alJt ♦ `r - tilt IIIR J R `A Z<PC {�+`'' 09/83(.21f, _ ASE 0 fi�� h •?� r��tyVSL. n,.J`.iSa7 JELJt i.V� - n71 • r•.,• rya(��R�_ ��++ tt,, _ tie�+ T� i�Nl:- lr;,ME= t 17. y�� vt v�ILE .rtQ'Sly uU_ C r +• r r? • nll nnr r{,r`, _r � Berl'f���T� ' D.Scr7aK�_.:r-Jy �R 4' �F= =L...!2 s b 2 I1 TJ n n t•�(nrr� 1ri Iln:1• r n,T•tr r,Fnrr•R �•`R�,:r•w Ir1.ls- �� '; nrr+�-.'�n ! r R r-'r T R E"n 1 n i f r} _ (.� n Y 7� fi ! 7 +.3. 6 [� P� r l _ 1 �.-L .4 1.iv- '.}A -.x' 3. 8 �A _RF �J 4 ES J .2 J _ .�� ...�� �N;ii ;f i^L't i:� V _ BUTPUT PYBROWGRAP ? r fEl'[ RR • a/,`I r n� �+� Rii]1.jr Q T•�^ n� nra nr�rlATTn J14 �1 nta _ u�PfC= In _ : '1a INTERNAL HYDRICER r� I"E f � ARVT G-!4A' ' .. :NER;4_NT E7 -nn }. A1 Tr.{1{ PEAK! 5,/�i 2% T Y'.-,n•.•n 4EXCEEDS y1 �!a� CEXT '( ^nrlS 'a4 n+in •`NAT-F rmy j=,:. 1J:�y/ K•a JO[E • IIJ_V•y� Y li>. L' M1/ Y1.��J..'•• '�U•t��V � L..J �.:T!l .. �{ ❑ _ "rye•-- �["IL 7_■ nnr! nnr F n. 11T- -LS -µri'T`v./"!�+'i it{t■�7i �Lf? CVh 15D.6c L..9? Z,%t T,)4E�inS1 FIRE' �v^n�c^AF �'?:V' = , � t `�1RS T_M_ :?�r c E T = iiun5 D'AINAGE AREA - ,02 S ,'�i, k r ,V! �1t�1.11�1J .411 t2 0 ,k11 , •Y v�� et?� ,11� a�/V , �f .^e. �• - li ,6F1 a76 tv/ L4+ ■�`? \'+'� a7 r?� af-y 6 a1 ?4,DD 31scl?6 .?r .?9 61 6 .8144 St u eG� 26v.or, ^7 avT aCl 6,110 DI HBY .90 .9n' .9i 1.,4 D^ .T! I.'? ?.GD iSCIiE 'aa '_,�� ,.26 :."b -?� :,?�� =? `[93 .94 a.00 1ii'L?7J.e ..�.� i7•_ .,9r{ I.n ., b _ ! a•i= }U JL+c,s�L'� ^,�4 ^ L'� .IaF �. C'� Gv +.:JC is~Y ?..+. J V..T' . sa L. ar t^ nn �fn ¢ 7 '�' Z nri ?L, -, ■ .,nT �r;c. irN D Is LINE _j R Jy r, fy•r111:t� . t ti ywa'_ ~�,CJ !}J'?a _. ! f•1 , 7 ',1' J,J} •� .�,ra.e._n C it r'7 r � ar , s ?,_r ,—_ .,,n •i:r _-J i i11 i ��L L/w1�i.11 1i•�Jt �!i ■ — �t J.'— u '/ .- __ '� s_r. '{ 47 :r fyn w,nRrn n ^� , i.� it ^ - r7 ^ �T r• r. .:n nt(. 10 L. L: •j y • • �3r 4� �1�1r X�d �.`T Y- � ;,'iR. C%:DS:a I.:•r 5.•___ './_4y 1 rl•.�. .r�y� .. •7jA H , PACs - �[ /�Q/r�.� F - •� y. •y! �'•- y `� v �J+ �`Y �L V!7 t�v(a L� '•�17i L L ,t•TM' ... _ /:IrL ail , r . : . r • r +.,� 1 �^�• t, r, �1 rr-+AI M1Tr n rr r -r A nr/, rl r--- r rar 1.11 ='iT- rn >.�•,1.r - �, 1 .r1 L �.�{'r ri C� fPrt-.._-_ -h4r='!ry'p _ !1/� nrn AREA- ' f,n T Ln r. _- n/ taC_ -1-, - _ _ f.- + T-,-. _ ,nrr _n• V t•� `'A: Vr� ;,n«'�1+ T_ � � i�w11�_1` a r'�Jr ..ry !: 'l lal i. .TJ .iNr _ TqA If n- nrrt - `- •T_- I-`^Ti Sa :T �{=1RC-y) 14FJ_.V_� 24,41 4.47 ♦ r r rrr rrr.•,t. • n,lrn n : n nnr _..rr ' Rv` �►�r V" wE AS"'v- BA.s �Sw = 2r9° wA,l �c� :`�.-_�; �: _'. ,� -�^ :?,5i �.�:- ?�?fic=:?A.' = .44 CPS In A 7 1 ADD-Y✓ CROSS "0N' ? _ INPUT �'fY� v'i�11�1g�t7- f y 3liT`..? PEAK TTMEt14RS� P[AK D.SC A��S�vrS' a•a� __-J�T_,tt,�� :4 IA I'• nr � /�.�t 1 1 ' �La it 'i<,u•1 iuL_1 's'- 12.66 1G ,56 ' 22.42 ►c 7 Q Iylt t• � Y t 264,44 nl: � .an<:- n nrr n•1 T r, rt r nr n r•.•, nr •nr, r_r`4• � `�_ "F VOLUME Gt,7L ,.rid! — .. t W 'F? ^_ _ _ U� �TIQ� ADfiY� �n"SS1T.L4L = ;Iljfiy•�T ^�tjr+,rr=K�tC'r'�_ j. --r.^+tl� �JLR'�=«;`,r:iz , OTAK 'T%c; qc' '^ 33 ve ter! (j•1%� ii nrr •fin.: ,k: •r.'1 srr`- rt T n-r J'---n• -r -, r•: --- r , l- w iw awn'4t+ n nnrt •.rn-Tn rR20 XE2 04-oi-a9 SERSER WIT4 SJULTVAN AVE 5 15 PASO 3 REV ?C 091831%.2'1 PAGE 12 7, 1 4 �2.ll� JA 2A.Or; 24.3 R J N 0 V Z!_!j S ru"VE, A S E 1C 3 5 3 7-R S w r-Du C F S U7,�3 7M6 S A 3 F 10, fcc .PERAT"N WIRT` `R,'" SECTION :NPUT PEAK TNEMS) P E A 'IT."T." ARR E, Cl. S PEAK F-Evol 1.PIN(C:,T, 12.2 'U L'I 21.19 8.13 22.00 7.74 WILL 12 4 0 12- 3,3 N,u L RLIKOFT, VOLUME ABOVE 3AS__EF,'J_GWW = 3t60 WATERSRED INCHES, 484,15. 7S-FRS, 40.01 pp=7!nW _ET; .00 CFS IFEW10% RESVnR CTR"PTURE 3 INPUT HYDROGRA.PH= O'ITDU'r SURFArr ELEW.TTf'N= 67.30 D':-Atf*t T T.4iE(HRS) PEAK "TSC4A"7(!%:n! P-.4'z 1'13.21 9611,117 6 24,2 AV 6 S 3 R07F VILLIFFE MINE SAS_" 7W 7.6p wz�.C�.,Er "A-!nW LU, U EXECUTIVE fMINTROL GPEERAMN, Evonvn U j _nil y } t t, A , ni' XF+� !1.'-C�.'r-35 SS 4 PAGE n f nf\y u 7^20 \n-77 , �n n- 1 C(''„ t{ 17� vJ•�IJ L ii.... L�' _ v�''iL •.i�i� � ��iG�Q •ll nt ewe r e*a I� a II��� ^ `�I - 1 �j ` ��{t n t J'�'[:i 7 ri•ir't - I�v RA:N DE n _ 6,20 \,i_i• ulaR^T. �Q3:r 9n.- !Y ;•I.�� n►, R_ 1 R:T�R��?G '�tc?� Ary -C�1 Ik ' >J._ i S M, ul.-1.'J Ark �Rr�'JTIVN R,li VIZ 4n�CG !,• n iF- Y., �"� n T'V r- • 1�'1 �-,egnr, •ti _�c _h�t�L 1"Y��4J`��'a. T.'�= .���'=�-hT- `tii_R� ;;.•J.0 T•yR� _ {rl~�S� r \ �aLL�V� r.F,-Cj .+�,r,,' __-•{J�_Vk' - T\ R 3: 7 n n _ ti� r R•R a--\ 1�IaC _ !, e- r,rr n•, "n;._� •.r,y'.� n n RL ,•-� , t ArSi�* Bag=`_;.. - �.a` ;t?�';�� '►_ _�, �3<y. "�'--�-c ?,« A�FE-FEET\ EASE-'_� = t�,: !`�. s ., .i HRA I. N RCSVCR STRUCTURE INPUT FVDRr'SRAP4= b n_'pt`T ►;Y3RCRRAF�= ? SURFACE E_EVA7.0V= 71._>> I PEAK T'*_;?iRSi ?cof �.-a-A�E:�C=�� -E�ir *LEyA-'IV(F:77 { .n VuLJlE APEVE `,66 WA''EnS,S;4:?'1 ?Y L+ES, CH ��,�;� ;.c_uRS, �, ���t-`�_'• f1A rr•n, = nrn _�perr T�1'1 t nl�+i"•�[ n-non -n+s^ n n F n pnr. +� S r' i.�T 'S11iI r_T_• -'ij �ji_ nn t• r• 1' nn n= rr Rr+4+.- •n ••niin FinL�_ 1<••� 1 .�'a !�• _ �t114� 'JL"Y_- titer �� v 4���-�:.i� !_ t lVERNAL PEAK "MF(,;;E) r�,�' w.�r\ry`,SnF f^��1 ���;• - RT!n Ir-���� 12,16 s _ 6.LJ n� jL = 4'�F N:_Jy"_ �i•RY_ ���r`_ak - �.`li �4�-=_n.__ _;iv• �' .�r.�," ^-�-.~� - rp .-, _ _ 44 _ -a nn •I ._. T A s•{'; h! ,t nr earn TT r r,r 1 r. r.• i,yr w.r • rr �L S"Is � DA •�-• `�4V Xc� l�"'-11i�� :F�I�L� �r�1i.1 i�i: r� ��`�_:L!'�1 �r/► ,i"��:i�','t�. v. �� rr1.. 5 4 -•"fi REV PC 09/83,. � ^=^��•'Is�( R;;�CF= CROSS SEC'.'-N i - . • w - O;J+O3T r.YuROeRA !� r n r 11+1-- n,:r...`_ '7` _ r,r nn,n�a'T*� TTn = rr,.ir•, flREAZ of �J x. �v 'v�� :r:+'►(i+L- 'va .�� vuy�_F ;1 a.{ - r7v -uJn 1 IER'A L. rYORw _ •ten_,� t_. •ti' U;."4 _ �r• TTy �� �r i��g •1•�.� F �L,nrc+, _,'4{ _ _ .rtk ir•`� r L i-!E• I ..r J_•..r1--1--� i sue•. _d riT _t• _ ABOVE 1e79 -..�a.r r_n j n~f�.yTi r...rr�_L._�y fv__4F R SEr c _ OP_RAT'694 RUNOFF CROSS SECTION v OUTPUT �YDR'OSRkP;�= 3 n • t n•;T �1 r A.,rl,. ..�r r rn�n[,T-, TTn�•_ t 'In'rR�, ' AREA= .DL 5x '�� ��r R;�hOF- �, avE= 9Sa ...� Or L,-.LIZ .NFERINAL i.Vi}aISRArr• TTK '?X^Rt�t{4 = ,13.33 !'?U��i3 L� +� W ARN• G-!1AIN TIME INCREMENT NCREMENT MAY BE Tn,T _Arnnr • �� ' 1 T T• ` r- T1tn nr Ar... n 1 w= R ., .fert�` A , i r �+ T 1 n fr nrr• ,,. a.O''�Pi►TED PEA' 1 58.,t l Q XS�s r_C�4 _X:��kDS 'I f�X, ��1• { �YL ,J_r;; ^y eTE rY PEAK -:ME(HRS) 3Y.K R_�n.�S'i t !'r"1 �'r.:' _yp_•� ,,r=T) J,1" !a1 .5 Cif •� I it 0 t5 liLi a r lt1� _ .5,51,E ,�n3.97 !R „�Z - •• T n r..rn ' TIerr4R3; DnCNAGE AREA .02 a .M' n n s`1} a J ,v r. ,t`: a V N ■ti'`, 103 .07 ^_#•,.. .34 .36 _ . z2.0 DSCIr.G .38 Tw 3.014 !riI[5�f:+.F6 .53 ❑bv 51 a .n�� .90 .69 Ea la� i•1�a7(L� 13 r��. .�Z •+t .�'J :Q� , 0 •94 :a r 0 -,06 _ y'''•', 6.00 1niaZW,J74 lalf O t, _.%i7 �ary ':L3 +. as'J�► 1,t�9 7.00 UISC4S 1.46 t"7 •a�^ �as $a n n - + s n[ r n� ea11 t�1JaL7L1�.L:7 i..t� a.,�' st+:� L,_i1 +::�� ^aJ L+ 9 .. 74 c:s.�� , 11.'F' UICQ 3a5: ,91 7i9f� 4,11 z,?i .fn �.'r, 1 { 1 ,11V�.'Iri als i., J _. �.?.'. ra _ _ _ a'._ ,.,!•a:�? _'_. 4r rl^ •Lr^«i ' n E4 Gt 'any ^y ;. i' ,_ „y�. + ^ ='' '.�� •' _ 1.7 r1�11 r.J a _ •S" .. 41 JIJi:..L ,lr�l nr . • n . rl. . -n n+ y,: 'R24 XS� 04-0:-a9 OS;"' SASS �.; w7 .�t: r1e•.wL/1 rr���\ an n!� F - �� JA ^�.91�•vf N-•JV.Iu IV� a'�•. 26/,V alv��{! f'� a V /•-• ICY r•r� 3 rrryLLL �- /nr,��` ABOVE /�11 n Fr 'rat - L 1 -RL\ rrS 1n ryr�. " #rt nrr_ }wy�i r r- �nrhlr_rr-�• w �.rr.n! ry)\ �1+`'\ ,.1 N9 T_—J, ABOVE BASE OW — 6.00 RA-R4-,_r♦ .�L�[_'.tt /i\Vi Lr4 w:\�j Jr L-• �f J'L` ���i[ �•Aa��'-4� — I is:. V.� + I ',Y r.=4AT,J•1 1 t1 ��r Ar./� � I•.;wTr t �•,Ta;rT -YDr�DCR�^a= ` -77 S rye \I �1 yam• +' �{a� �r !y _"T����, .rTYa1 f!�~��1� T�r� `�1����'_ �Y•\r'1 ,_:r1r�Y� 19,99 r t Ir ram.^.. - n y-rzn:• T ^ ^ Tr f\rn L ^a 7a^` -rr•r w^Ls r.••F+,r - t[t. !'y� RL�I"F- VC�JMC A�:�V� 3AS_r__.� - �.E� �. _-�-�� _VCi�E c6?\j.� ���-,R5, CFFPAT'OX n"ntgY!� CROSS S•r„r`�{1 7 1J 3{ 4 _•J'�J•• PUT HYDROCRAPHS= 2-53 C' 41-ROCSAPP= '_ PEAK Tr - n' rr I Z":ARRVE r^w \ - r lr r PVAT Tn -rat KILL j r 7 JI w� f T r lr1et Rr, r w 3.9E q,'yt`T= +iO'_'i"i ABOVE RASFY--"a = 1r04 ;>rA'�:;:,,._� :';: ., .�'. �-�-��-•a -ter:9 A„�;. _ S SfiaE-:OW - 4, cz�. 7 1112.61A. •r, a 7 e r.rr 'Ir is Rr1F� [' w1 -- .. _ t r- ,.-.-1L-_ -�,n•-^n r� _ nr•+ - �r •.a --_•'_ - �r-_ 1: _ n.•, nrn r�;�•�t .;fir ^�^.-_ _ - -__- � .,;, -,�n__ . Fan XEI AV! sRA7NA= 3! ire. • ti PASS REV PC 09123%2) 1 apgr 16 pzpv c: 46 22."Ir- NJ_, _L: J '-FFET; "FASEFLOi .00 EFS vil-U•w" v C r F f4,15! ICE A ry CiFT;-�7n.N DDi' D PR"SS 7 :NDUT PYDROPIBRAP�2= if 7 0: ZI; LlBPAPH= 2 DEA'� T!MC(`Sl D T 3"4ARmF 1-=1 7!CVAI?rjN I? =r li. Jo i7 -0 4 S 20.59 Wrl, -)4.•19 "NA VU' 2L. 'M7 ZE1.4 P?-C_L:nq h','NOPF VLOE A.BTv"F BAS-F-FIE-A 4,31 ATFQcT-r_7. -N-NESt 46. 1 ACRE-FE-7-7; BASE SE G On, "PS R'""RE N'R^?"AP�= 7 MARCE F'--t-VA74C�= '-j 31 f# r-O - rn 'r 3._ _0W t;"20 X-C 04-01-E9 08•nr wr_r.rw ,.►r. fi1 S T 4 A r- C 2r of Y P"a 09/83;t 2? J_$ SAS$ PASS 17 . r^'IT _a_,. v;VE C01TROL OPERA'?Ov rGxP;;? =,tix XSE�"O TO STR_+CT..,^ 3 w - 5'•'R7'iiV6 'I!I� _ .OJ RA'� ^E�'�' = E 9n Rf:N �Q T,I�y, � np r, „ _ - �a 4 �1� A _1-_k- t.1!i R17IN TS'1Y LE %_.= 3 *n'ST. POND= i R=?ORNATE Nil - t 0TLC! NO -99 ` T!9� � "R - ��.rR.. t �"At� r. _�tr.�*..�T CPERAT,ON R'JN3FF r505S S=CT I ON 7G''PUT UY1.RuBRAF-= 6 AREA= ,"rl ad '�i IKFi;T nLi�iOFF ":vE= 95. ':xE „^ .,�NTw 'ATERNO, "YDfiOBRAP11 'IYE '.,YCREyENT= 0,227 !GURS ?E LL TTm1zt("'RSf PEAK DTSUWR3E(C'`S11 P_At riC'Jy--Pk1fFEM 12,16 36.015 (RJ�iC=r! L L;1 Vt L.L. (�lr'��J" • W.4TR?,�nF yO L1c ABOVE 6.35 ER SHED INCHES, aF.34 , 3.99 ACRE-FEE'; BASEF12W = .00 LFS V OPERA��N RESVOR STRUCTURE I INPUT HYDROBRRPR= 6 nttTc T ;YyR?16cARu_ 7 -" SURFACE ELEVPTON= 711t00 ; PEAK T_ . rr _ '!'!t(}(RS, Et tr_Str'•ARS_��-a4 PEAK E:.E'iaTaON(}tcT; 12.41 =:.77 76 '6 .� RUNOFF VO'_I;!!E ABOVE BRSEFr 3c T .,, ^`w_,1 , �OW = b.33 iiA r LRSNED -NC►�ES, 4E.12 :7 3 -+RS, 3.98 ACRE-FEET; BASEfL OW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTTON 2 OUTPUT HYDROBRAPR= 6 AREA= .03 S0 MI INPUT RUNOFF C1;V_= 98. 7`4E OF CtiNCEHTRA?ION= INTERNAL KYDROBRAPH ''ME THCRErENT= .4227 F01�S PEAK TIKE(NRS) cEAK D!Sw�ARaE(CFS c-_K ELEVAT W EET) 12.16 32a46 .i.•r 15.01 4.64 r 31.N,rrr L nS 5 23.40 a.+, [�_i'1,- 3 •'7�" 1r.T - OF rW .r e'a.y - - �!` — rIC1C^�T'lli: r �r� r+ n�w ^EnT-r, v. nslTw.-► rPTM�rRT __ _ • 5���_ 1M1� �� �: ���,'T ?::fir'` �_��_— �„ --Y_ __ ,wy._�—�R- rt_ ,,, —_ :�iT:'{!t►',N_ �ItrJr,Rn� -h' TrC ��'•._�Y+tiT._ r'1 _^'�_'n TR24 X'-_2 04-0 -89 OB: 1 WITS Sr.L' 7"AN AV'- nRG"h�,E: «B 1 PASS REV RC 79/83(.2) PAGE 16 ,. Y-rr :-.J 6+ -. .r -_.n i..-.:_Z Jnrc L! . - _ ..^Jr• -�� • J i R LI_T 4. "J���sR , f �tT w` r��l,,- C Anr ^ }� . rw..� .S r_- nr•n -,n +• r1= nna,�+� r w= •w;{ n - '1f►{1Jt .3-4 S2 •�. J Y� i .+�'1V�- �a, .�'L .. 'vv Yi����'� '_L,- r '�Li1'4s IN r`.R4L LY"rR7�":+"' ~ ? i�C C T= .:�~�%v ^�L•r_ A1 p• nf`n rrxr rn—ni »— +-n J--»+r PEAK Tix_(HRJ! n4.31 n •fJ ,wi+ wr_ r � [ �� � n n rr n:rr f n••-` a - nrn n�, rr-• ..r'�q,x RUNOF VO�UXE . ` � EASEFLOW = L.LL aiATt ,-=? . '1r�., :';_ - .—rRS, R.15 A":E--�- ���, L,PPT?CN RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 5 ,.JTP., DRCoRAp.- L 3 yq r n ITG i ARtA= .�� �� !IJ INal,Ta,ItNrF; C����r~= �in TTWr n{ fi4n»w. .:1 L �. ��:.�:R�.TT i �= ._�? •OI, nR� !NTERNAL HYDROGRAPH TIJ£ lNCRE0cNT= ,0133 '1:L++RS WARNING—MAIN TTMr— INCRE',chT MAY ?_ TOO _AR£E, COM!PU'ED PEAK( 61.78) AT XS;rTTON 5 GYP=="= "AY, A"An:NT ry RvGfiA= v0'?RD.hATr BY 5 Xr � ,x r Tf'I',t Rn , rn t r �• v t �,Trr'T PEAK TI.M,E(SRS! PEA'• , ►A►tjE;C-�) Dg� �'_EVA!:Ckt�cc.) 23.97 4.43 1?ft:,��i�c! •�'TRST ;iYrw`» '��' =ir':,' _ r f• 'r``�»�x T_71�1 d v r�=`Yr - ._�l `L_. ,!'w1. 3_ _ .02 .ag,rlt dV lll3tau'a�l rt .r.0 02 vu�{rt �� �(j rx� C7 CA Tt7 n� •`v`a 6a a f�!�`�1 ,'•i .rk.Rr ,_r. ,_ .L� ,1 .x:�.+ a �1{J, a). ' �Jryy�rr1• {{Y��rra ��iRt��Va S v x 1.�++��I .76 •74 .h' S�^ t J J 1�C' •i A 1 S 1 A� � aill� 111ELfE 172 a97 s,�" a=:� _ {! ,E• n� a , J,44 .1. ,/ ri.._ _,J.i an ? R i t_ ,i ,LJ �.�3 1 n�1 n��w�:r C �,( J [� A.7 a nn �,;1. li:v�v '! _v�r,.r �_.r•_ _.7•: e _ _. �,-1.- +._•J L� T a i L a_t 1� L a:at S."Q DISCHO 2 44 r_� " - ".d4 f a =J I G ?� L,�L L�''" L ;t J'.� - ..)c L t,17 ?^ .�`.,j "r r::7 =C•�3 �'. :p`� *_x- 71: ,1,'t. 56 •_ �,�` �_�•'kF' � `' 1 s.n T x� 1 S + T J T. - +� 4� R LZ In f=n•• - Ty �t •�•, 7-1J -.� J TT -r•7 -r-� 1� fll '_Lrt^ TR20 1:-2 04-0.-89 09a R1 �.`� •�� r1,}I, r��jl/� wr•a� pphi �._'r. w' ' PAS^ !. x,,�r REV Fv 09/33;.�'. y PA; tq � - 4'M .e��? .r.���� i'^I' Rn 1 =Jf t.n zr ww •SY R ww .89 ._, .39 .89 A nn„ ' -1�1%rMn BASF;~, Jw _• .?� Rr TC Ki���J • 'J Cv 1_:;a__ _ - "'��j • _ lu � rCrTJ �� wr_t175 — f,J� ^r� _ r„Tf J� n �W`.RVE= 77, �BKE = ^Ii1E�;TRa'•-^y: .�r< j�{, � :'STERN?- ?EAK T'.14E(4RS) OC� w lv^`�1��[of v) F_A< EL VATI Oh f--=_=T) I9.99 b.i7 (RUNOFF) 24.44 6103 1RUNOFF) RL'NPFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 4.3? WERSH i`C ES, 109.54 CFS-`:RBA �`..0 ACRE-BEET; 9ASEFE 4iI = .GAO ply OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECT'ON ? INPUT HYDRC'o"RAr'HS= 2�13 -atiT HYDROMP-= I PEAf4 r•.7',RARGF—fEF9) 12.67 17.87 .-4,4 t :.i ; ! J .rRUN� '•'ar ABOVE ACrr�1 C � nra •n4n 1 a bc • RE TL '_�^,�.�. 9w pre — .`c V'` a-.. vv"FDDt!?Sfi F��T�ji4 7 IT 11l1Sj���V �_ ♦ 1 f1:<T JI;T ji`..1 n.�nL Ste,: •?, •n r l 117 r a nw 7 •� 7C •y+ w.��- =�^_��!� ���'tllC i``=__^dl _ r`r,hi .4-�'T-^�_ '•� �\d�_ _ -• _ __—___ _ _ _.r___ _ _°�.__ � _ t;i r_n ( - -i6 - - _ '� I�.,, 7'.n � t' a �' _� t• .. �`tt • �• w+ry s{ n� Cw +rn + ASS 5 - ��114 z�y �I�`a_`n9 t��:Z: ��":_1 14: Y-� V= ��n"1A~/, y� Z�% �•G c - 7` ^;A ,4:j•!: ,rt. _L1 IV'` ABOVE BASEC,. Y - A.9i W4'E�ay Y _�J-vS, 620,27 ^^J -R^� JS I±_ �V~� --rT; L•I�i _vf. - t•�� J�1-� "PERQ'TSh A"DHYD CRASS SEP' % ,pp 17 r ,� ,�r ' nr rt nl+�r rnk r,T �-�. T .t , ?LAK TINE{-RS1 --A DiS�r!�4,at,C-v/ `"v tLcVP ._ '.7EE,) 12.23 95 tNUL_qt 12.39 i i7.91 . 11 �` r tyy r ■d -.r 20.5E cZ,D :A. /y/� L s 24.OC f5.66 !iMLill , rr n� ABOVE rr Jar, +rn ,:r + ,rn r 1 nrn n r _ /+ n RUNT: V31AIIME ABOVE EAS►_�i i:w = �,9E idA._�e..tD :�r�=�, 669,08 ,I-�—:i2.t FASE=.;:� - ,DD ;.F� vEERA;;� "ESVDR IJI T 1;YDROSA?F= 2 vU'PUT 'L:YrrRCS=AP:;- 7 SdRrACE E=EVA?.L = b?.•��; r,s .. n• n .. nr . -y n_•y'-wn:� �L'IL u'..v' wuv A" . LR ?t WA-C- n_rr-j �•,v-,-r _r.-1-_ _� inn`_-r_-T �SR��t"• � nrry �A--.,,J�-••= nnFUT:VUI.. v�=�l"T'�� =�.�i_�� wr i�J�__�-_. _ _n�'�_ ^* .f� ,,`'1` _ ;�.�vU'�;, _„ r � ~"fin. r.Se yr-07 �l� �: t.•_�r Z lea. d__�.:YT;. -r'; ;. FxT�t�l_ '�.. .V�. .1,_1 _ ,~. 4'V�}'1 Y .. n RED nn S n1 ',t�yl 1,?� _ - . _ - nTrw .-n• __ nr `T :r^J�.7. !1`` 1�yy-n::+T,r nn Trn nrn:nv, - � ^nw rr -r rnr. _,. AL'f !A CT1 i; -'- T•.- •rr�L q•n -t- • rw t r� !rtr• ,Ar I,r` w•n t- '•, ,s Tn n^wn ti,. ,,,,.�.�• �'t "v J, i' ? �`'�;i•�_ �:1sr W�" �� � ..r�� t ��y_.�,•rC � __�; �.� ,:Y�1;.:� Q��F"1Rr trnT•n ��: t::r,l T�,rSTnr.Ty r. } 'y AZT r,11'Cm L ?"Pl�+! 9T4NDARD RAIN Av'E" "'ATE �.�C.►:'��,., a:pk n"--ARrc CT :,n T!r�� .•F Tr n• F F•?.n w4 +f•e: 11nr�T -� i - --_ DJY 4 rLS.N r E N., _ InS �•: .^�, ram,`ta -y� ►w1 r_ y r+; i�R; .4+Fn` .n��i A�TLS ATr STI;Rm i XCtr n t• (� ,•1 �{ y�.L'N 1 *RUNOFFa--�--e fV,+ 3 a •V r`l �,i� i�',++���0 2,6' ---e �i.-� •sd.v'v 1.3E26}.0 S'rR'171;E 1 RSSVDR .01 3 .. ,, y^ , .+_ Rf`,'J S,, 2.61 ��,f6 ate,52 �c-2 412,J XC„r�T ,1+� 4. 1 lJ 71 ? i � •t� nr• r fy+ 7 ^ r1 n .t r R�• .n C .. n•4 7 X�En .r .DA 3 RUNOFF 24,0r, _�.vc 446.s {S_L.i ;v I :{M`. .04 a o •�.: �Q, n .a r✓v ___ 12.59 i' 116.48 •� ,.7 yyn �aT•n r ,r ? n f1 .� R/ (� n n --- �+'{ +t, +19 IL L ti RUNOFF 24i v 2 . it ifu _,a:1 Lys0Cr _.,��• .2 %5 i9. XSECTTt''r 6 RUNrrE .i1 3 .:ti .1 3,`= 2».00 149 --- 1:.?4 ??.19 335.0 X5_"7TnN 7 ADDNYD 3.15 24,00 :.4` --- '2,"9 E1,54 317.1 XS=C"i"N 7 ADDFYD .17 3 .�: '._t* 4, :.4' 64 56,90 335.: XS7^7'ON 7 ADD"YD .20 3 i a:D .0 ?..'.` ln1vi `11;2 --- 1i.-9 56.99 442.9 XSEC'CN 7 flryDHYD .21 3 " ,1') 10 3.'.5 2A110 1.6? --- 14. 9 91a00 437.11 5TR':CTti9t 3 RESVCR .Zi 3 2 .? ' .0 3.1 s 174.on 67 "j.44 :3.11 44.2q 212.7 A!TERNAT- I ST'U'RM 1 XSECrIDN 1 RLfNCLc .G1 3 2 .1" ,C, It,,uo 741 4,25 --- :2,16 24.68 2091.7 aTh;_L :nE a RESV,:R .S:a 75,_� _ a 61 5.42 459.6 +�3 Z 2 1r' t• 4 In �� .,r, XSEC':U1� c{ Kr � .r .1J t . /1 .. ,: ,'.. t. _R>•�. �,F.Q9 cQ..{�V�.• XJEirTl^i i R�'�N+ �M ,Vl Tt r A1,111: iAI "I ___ :i.r`L ��14.?f��{ (J�JJ.7 XL� 1t1rN Y RySS�7 a04 ti i ,:�� ,� Y,y1 1717 4,J�' itrf --- i� =? 74. 3 S'95.0 a i.v•_ XCEr' ?N o 'tip .i I 3•. :.;, �,C., =�. ,r, ",�` --- :'_',%[L`��++ mn,'? f i:i.7 X�rn •nat. T A(51'y,'.'.��• �Z ? i ,_n ._ �.,��' n� ('.1z ':.J. `-- ,i.47 n,< Q� 66, T 4 XC^n+•n,' nR!1V�1 ,_ ? n( ^1 to _ --- . n -f!+77 +f1S IL X�E7-'11L. ' G'1VD .^l ? ,. L, O '..� ' --- 54,15 721;.9 y`�nT•n - !,I Riyy E, Far T, ,rt' ,� • _ n. nri ' 7� ^. n-n•r T„-- Z rFrr;rnR ., - ^ - '+ � --. -� -- n•. r 7`r�1 Y�_n+Tt!�' - nr`tr-- .. -r i !., ;. •. 4r. n�.,..1 - ___ .-. -� � ,n. n-�^-' [.-r�`,n- �•; ^rtiL1Z'� � L ... i4z v• =r :n 4[�� nr'__ - - L_.' � �} Y }� �) �} roc" �f {� ;� J A.E rt Y$ti1 h= u�t' 0?;7 SJr.�:V- 1�-.��. ���a +nni� =C - *1 , SUMMARY - --•V- ,- R_v Pr. t191123!.2? - -- - F Rw w ASEE 22 J ,;4YlAr n'� T^v_E _ a7�__.T_,. '_..v-Tv n ►-r. �1A� A� 7n..-w!•.w r.r T„n ��-�...,-ter.,w ,. t- r, .. .._ ._V, ti Syr (aA [� A r_ r C /� A,• RA 1 1 w+n T- `_ T T_ �.,'3lM'-J:{ l.. �;�1-f•l�'�. `T-ri Tr !/r�'�'�1"1'.Z.'- T. i� F11{� 'l l+.'S �L�SI 1�f1;..U_J - __..y 1��• i �.! a;`f��r,rl nTSA '1 ln, n"' -a-n 0!r,r.nn '•. ,►+„ "e• n 1T �♦ T l xAh ,�r ♦ -it, . ;a 'a Sr nT!��J vTQ�J°'�i% '{�.� M Tfj YAiN P,�_r,t-.T�T.q t` I,AI •. __ _ I�tr T�< .IAwnT -_a` ------------------------- _-----------------6-�,~'' �L , -'! N _ nn•L.. YI\t}-. 1_ Ia t,..nn: {r.��}_ �] tt �+ .q, J� - ---------------/-�-- • u �.>-1'1 Li� nr_ y� U _�Y•lC L•ful\ ^ -4_�- uaI'1�-�.. ' r r'J RATE f. i 00L 1' ) tiaw' �'i-.•��.'r rrn1 �I-�' �r'i� !^fall iLS`9 ' .Trn IAT= i LL7f1n� •1� X,S_;vT..i ce-5 RUNOFF •\�+t � L ,_l I iT•otJ Cs.� --- +A •� 17530, 50.62 9 XmrrTT oty'10N 6 RUNOFF 2 .,tl --- .� 97.10 S?Y B . XSECTT@1N '( ADD"vD .: 3 2e,nn 1,37 --- :?:rC i10%4,56 792.2 XfiECT.Ot� 7 fiD3 'f D ..? 3 ,."v .0 5.47 -4.00 ?, --- 12,62 44.03 848.2 XSEC'TO'N 7 ADDgYD .20 ? 2 ,? .0 5,40 2 00 '.:.{, --- 80,16 9'?,3 y. I V 24,DD '.61^ --- :2.4: :85,4, S90.5 t` S"SJCTutE 3 RcSi�G,R .2' 3 2 ,iG .!; `,4''� ?4.vr '.5^ ?3,96 '3,:: 96.77 464.8 x;,; A"TF4!ATt I STOR4 50 XSEECTICNN i RUNOF .it 3 2 .:n .n 6," 24.;D 5,65 32.27 2734.$ _R, STRUCTITE : RESVOR Al ? ._;� .� �, 24,34 5,66 s6.07 :2,5. ,5)u 1064.4 XCECTIGN 2 RUNOFF .�03 ? 2 .10 .0 6.20 24,{i�( b.D�} --- :2.tb 74.04 27H3.6 XSECTiC4 ? RUN-OFF ,G3 2 ,:Q ,U h.2, 24.C. 3.?9 --- :t,4% 36.94 :384.4 '3•= XSECTICNI 4 RJNGE- .04 3 2 .0 6.70 '74'riel 1?� --- :i.52 5.,32 1322.9 :S'L 1 29C8.7XSEu=i0N RLVQFF 02 ? ? 55. 7 - SXcETION b KSOF t {1. 1 t i9.95 AiJ DHa: 4L �`V "",^4 --- 1.2.67 a29,60 7!` 1 , XSECTTON ? ADDHYD :�7 3 4 ,`_� 6,2'v' 1�,G�J ,� --- 12,bi i77,2i V43.1 XSE:."UN ' ADDYC, 24,c 4,2r --- :'�.'i 2i`.2b I046,0 XSECTIGN 7 ADDFYD .2t 3 ? a_ C':: 4.?? --- : 22 220.71 1�3bD.1 STRUCT'!RE 3 R=S9GR :2i 5,2" '` 4,33 74,d6 ";IT ,1 XS__ ON I RUNOFF ,1'_ 1.- ILL, • _-. ., b,.,, --- 2.,6 36.65 30154.9 -77 1-t 1 i , n-ATTnj A 1 NCF A� 7 _yi.-'..�T! ,.' Par r^� ,i� ? , ' t r 1'. L -__ •.y t7 n Ai (fin S A rJ --- ;4.- 6 f(�i •'"�: . ` .n.'. a _ r:of '.j.�'. r, --- .�,ir? .`'`!'j,.^.�' :n�•J.v y n wn n,'1 w L.J_ _:C,a4n. rn r n.: { r )I .w.r^7s.. ..~!� ct�' _ _ ..j `y i'r , L-�.f --- n 7n 124 Xt€i 04-01-89 oQ:21 CtRKR WIT" �1AN AVt �RA.VArc c5 350 3O$ ! SLI!1MARY ' R_Y °C DWE3 f.?; OA6E $ ;. CrFSRY T^ L:. 3 — Li 4T h�.^T.��� ��� T,_�T_�_;] Jl '�:.� L'T1� J AY►,7 _'`��}.t��., - a -nR*i 4l.!�BEERS.......... Y STej;rT�n. •. ALTERNATE' ' 4,97 L �w (� .i C •4• ', A��CT�JA • --- —.�• ALTERNAT= I 32.27 .:� ..XSF:—glK 2 .G3 Az-'E,vAT€ 1 37.27 EZ, XSE41I 3 .03 ALTERNATE I I�■�S ?-.9h ~.�:~ 6.wa 4-■9r,, XSEC,TION 4 ALTERNATE 16.41 34,73 =,'6 `:.3z 3 ,K ALTERNATE - 29,31, 4�.73 z2 55•:- XSECT ON b -37, G .1 ' t'"' �� •!G ..z tart' n. XS*CTMN 7 �—ALTERNATE : 7f,14 t�'�,t4 •e�C`a• et'1/''�; r� ry'n� .. X O ' L '/ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL r � O Date ``'t---7-eq Project No. bS-�56 FUSSMAMEILL �- cc nsulti engineers� g Attention: 210 Main Street,Manchester,Conn.06040/(203)646-2469 RE: C ��-�-C�, "��Ct, Ilk vl TO AP 5� ( 1�of 9e,Mir We are sending you Attached ❑ Under separate c the following items: ehY op Drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications op of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Other Copies Date No. Description 7304'nz 1)�-L�4 g-1 P" These are transmitted as checked below: ❑,,//For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval l. 'FF�r your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ORs requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints q ❑ For review and comment ❑ For Bids Due 19 ❑Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS c j �` ` Gt. '-� LC4-1 C LO aujA- a 11-f)U, it L Copy to SIGNED: 04A AAA F O-100 RECEIVED 0 A 0 APR 11 *9 FLISS&CMAMU FACILITIES MMAGFX oonsutting eng e"M April 11, 1989 • Mr. William W. Stoscktrt � �� .✓ • Executive Director State of connecticut f Traffic Commission VL 41-- 24 Wolcott 1 tt Hill Road IDP.O. Drawer h W thersfield, CT 06109 R Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor OTC No. 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. stoeckert: W are writing in response to your request for additional information dated February 2, 1989, and our subsequent meeting with the Traffic Division on February 17, 1989. We have Included seven copies of the following items for your "view: 1. Roadway Plan - Sullivan Avenue and Site Driveway (revised 3/8/89) . 2. Schematic Master Plan - Gerber Scientific, Inc. (revised 3/8/89). Th following responses correspond with the numbering of your comments: 1. We have revised the roadway plan for Sullivan Avenue and the Site Drive, to include an exclusiva westbound left turn lane as requested. 2. The developer agrees that he will be responsible for a signal at the site driveway should it become necessary., dua. +o in the future. 3. Deeding 18 feet of right-of-way to the State would � �' cause non-conformance with the Town of South Windsor'* regulations regarding building setbacks. In our discussions with the Traffic Division, it was . recommended that an a ►semnt be granted whom nonconformance will exist. We have revised the Schematic Master Plan to reflect this change. 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. OSM /TEL (203) N6-2 469. FAX. EXT.307 SOLID WASTE IIAbAGEMINT 0 WASTI WATSR SMINIS•EROSION CWTROL•""A STMI S•WCOOLOSY NW ORAWAGE i�TEiIA�:tTE'lA1NrKNG HIGHWAY%All/2"IRUS SURVlY1NG LANDWAR ARCMITECTURE•TRANSPO YAT►ON AM TRAffIC 0 PIINLIC WORKS MANAGUAINT 8 MYOROSIOLOGY Mr. Wiliam W. Stoeck rt - April 11, 1989 pag -Z- andl �h.. �v��er�teKo h o¢ R�►tt 5 seal StAktt ve►r%Av t�"t . �or �vtwrL 4&5. The developer `� 4u ad further/larific&tion of possible .h#e- exposure Impry is atthe-e#-t}ie- Vappinp Ffva Corners �a R....t_ � _�� with a specific time frame assigned to those projects. However, our discussions with the Traffic r%� ftrl Division indicated that this is not w�►�� ��� the uncertainty of future funding• posaible� ue to OV% T dev oiler will agree to equitably res� t to � u�dt� tA•.a;� � eq ly participate in }sfut e i provemento at the pout• S/Sullivan Avenue arc %cw►►Eed to inter c ion, since the improvements have been defined. However, the developer is unable to concur with the request for improvements at the Five Corners GMA tit tK. intersection, because of the uncertainty of the scope de.-4etotu-is of these improvements. �At%%1hw 6,6 in discussed 1n the Traffic Impact Study, the ,,.��hoc based to section of Route 194 and Pierce Road was recently reconstructed without an eastbound right turn lane, or two lens approach on Pierce Road; %- -leeA,Jen is o�r cost ea��aa►1 �o � G! LLS O *V.A- 4 ;Mv►�ab�t sloe[ has i eee i4 LMrVW---- % iL 1 I tee-vp A sufficient right-of-way is not available for additional widening. lane ple"s the evigiftol A. 4ft 7. We have revised the road y plan to locate pavenamt markings and signs by ref roncing to fined objects, and to conform to the Stet 's numbering systems for signs. Sinca V~t Mwvt Ira�h r•ccw.t���cr+n�Nts AV%A ) toku�) v io►bl e. fro�v S s6tS *'*'E Cow% r4asor01011 lot p�yec.}c� ip im f ra V{ 1'kL�S ih +r3lc.�'iOr1`� � - dl vt�v�Cr �w.,erev�w►t�ins. Mr. William W. Stoeckert R April 11, 1989 Page -3- We trust that the information included herein is sufficient f r you to conclude your review. If you require any additional Information, please Contact us at any time. V ry truly yours, DRAFT Stephan F. Mitchell, P.E. Associate Director of Traffic Engineering SFM:Gmc cc: John Decker Marcia Sanach Chief Gary K. Tyler 85-350 0307ASTS.1 FUSS&O NSLL consulting engineers May 30, 1989 Mr. William W. Stoeckert RECEIVED Executive Director JUN 2 1989 State of Connecticut Traffic Commission SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT, 24 Wolcott Hill Road P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, CT 06109 Re: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor ' STC No. 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. Stoeckert: We are writing in response to your request for additional information dated February 2, 1989, and our subsequent meeting with the Traffic Division on February 17, 1989. We have included seven copies of the following items for your review: 1. Roadway Plan - Sullivan Avenue and Site Driveway (revised 3/8/89 ) . 2. Schematic Master Plan - Gerber Scientific, Inc. (revised 3/8/89 ) . The following responses correspond with the numbering of your comments: 1. We have revised the roadway plan for Sullivan Avenue and the Site Drive, to include an exclusive westbound left turn lane as requested. 2. The developer agrees that he will be responsible for a signal at the site driveway should it become necessary, due to site generated traffic, in the future. 3. Deeding 15 feet of right-of-way to the State would cause non-conformance with the Town of South Windsor's regulations regarding building setbacks. In our discussions with the Traffic Division, it was recommended that an easement be granted where nonconformance will exist. We have revised the Schematic Master Plan to reflect this change. 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES•SURVEYING 9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY FLWkS&CaYELU Mr. Wiliam W. Stoeckert May 30, 1989 Page -2- 4&5. The developer requested further clarification of its possible exposure for future improvements at Wapping Five Corners and the intersection of Route 5 and Sullivan Avenue, with a specific time frame assigned to these projects. However, our discussions with the Traffic Division indicated that this is not possible, especially with respect to Wapping Five Corners, due to the uncertainty of future funding. The developer will agree to equitably participate in certain future improvements, as currently defined, at the Route 5/Sullivan Avenue intersection. The developer's willingness to agree is based on an understanding that the improvements are limited to a northbound exclusive right turn lane on Route 5, and that the developer's "equitable participation" will be based on a percentage of cost equal to the percentage of use of the intersection attributable to the site. However, the developer is unable to concur with the request for improvements at the Five Corners intersection, because of the uncertainty of the scope and timing of these improvements. 6. As discussed in the Traffic Impact Study, the intersection of Route 194 and Pierce Road was recently reconstructed without an eastbound right turn lane, or two lane approach on Pierce Road, and a sufficient right-of-way is not available for additional widening. Since there have been recent improvements and there are no viable proposals that can reasonably be expected to improve this intersection, the developer cannot agree to commit to share the expense of future undefined improvements. 7. We have revised the roadway plan to locate pavement markings and signs by referencing to fixed objects, and to conform to the State's numbering systems for signs. 2 v Mr. William W. Stoeckert May 30, 1989 Page -3- We trust that the information included herein is sufficient for you to conclude your review. If you require any additional information, please contact us at any time. Very truly yours, 7 ' Step en F. Mitchell, P.E. Associate Director of Traffic Engineering SFM:smc cc: John Decker Marcia Banach Chief Gary K. Tyler 85-350 0516BSTS. 1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation Commissioner of Public Safety Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone : 566-5228 ` June 9, 1989 i Mr. Stephen F. Mitchell Associate Director of Traffic Engineering Fuss & O'Neill , Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester, CT 06040 Re: STC# 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. Mitchell : Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor As a result of the review of the Application for Certificate, the enclosed comments detail the additional data required in order for the review to be continued. Seven copies of the data should be forwarded to this office. i Should the data not be received within 120 days of the receipt of this request, it will be assumed that the project is not going forward. As a result, the review of the application will be cancelled at that time. ` i Should you have any questions with regard to the requested data, you may contact Mr. William A. Peace (Telephone: 566-5120) . Very truly yours, i illiam W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler / Mr. Thomas D'A ria ✓ Gerber Scientific, Inc. I Are Equal Opportunity Employer i MAJOR TRAFFIC GENERATOR REVIEW OF SUBMITTED DATA GERBER SCIENTIFIC ROUTE 194 - TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR I S C NO. 1 3i-88 1 2-�/1 1 The Office of Traffic Engineering has completed the review of the submitted data and has the following comments: 1. As stated in prior review comments, the site generated traffic will have an' impact on the traffic operations at the intersection of Routes '10, 74, 194 and Buck:land Road. Therefore, as in the case of other developments that have an impact on traffic operations at this location, it will be recommended that the developer equitably participate in the funding of any future improvements that offset this developments impact on this intersection. . Also as stated in prior review comments, this development will increase the traffic volume at the Route 194 - Fierce Road intersection by 15% to 17%. This increase will have an impact on the capacity and level of service of this intersection. Consequently improvements should be made to offset the developments impact. Analysis shows that with the addition of L-i short right turn lane for east bound Route 194, a second short lane for Fierce Road and revision to signal timing the number of cars added to this intersection by the development will be offset. A review of current plans for this location shows that there is sufficient right-of-way to accomplish such improvements. These improvements are suggested by the Office of Traffic Engineering, however any alternatives recommended by the developer will be reviewed. T. The proposed easement to the State should be shown on the Roadway Flan. r 0� �y � � STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation Commissioner of Public Safety 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Commissioner of Motor Vehicles Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone : 566-5228 June 14, 1989 Mr. Stephen F. Mitchell Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester CT 06040 Re: STC# 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. Mitchell: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor The additional data submitted with your May 30, 1989 letter has been forwarded to the Bureau of Highways' Office of Traffic Engineering to be incorporated into the ongoing review. You will be advised by this office if any additional information is required. Very truly yours, Aii� Z V/i;t William W. Stoeckert Executive Director /nc./ cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Gerber Scientific, An Equal Opportunity Employer DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ENGLAND DIVISION, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 424 TRAPELO ROAD WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 02254-9149 / REPLY TO ATTENTION OF D M ... :,p Regulatory Branch AU6 1 1989 CENED-OD-R-11-88-2423 AUG 4 1989 Gerber Scientific, Inc. South Windsor P18nnin Sullivan Avenue g & Zoning Commission South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Dear Sirs: This is response to your request for a determination of need for a Department of the Army Permit to place bedding and backfill in wetlands for a storm water utility line and to place fill in a wetland for a storm water outfall. That work is permitted under Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 330.5(a) (7) , and Part 330.5(a) (12) . , Nationwide Permits, as published in the November 13, 1986 Federal Register, and does not require further processing. This authorization is made in accordance with the attached plans entitled, "Gerber Scientific, Inc. " in 4 sheets dated "5-22-89" and subject to the attached conditions. Any temporary fill, such as roadways or cofferdams, etc. , placed in the waterway or wetlands to facilitate construction of this activity will require an individual permit. This verification that the work is permitted by a Nationwide permit is valid only for a period of two (2) years from the date of this letter. If work is not commenced or under contract by that date you must request a new verification to determine whether this Nationwide permit has been modified, suspended or revoked. Note that these conditions require the use of other practical alternatives to avoid or minimize the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters and wetlands of the United States. Before you begin work, you are required to obtain any necessary State and/or local permits, and other necessary Federal permits. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact_ Phillip Nimeskern at 617-647-8157. Sincerely, Stephen D. DiLorenzo Chief, Evaluation Unit Regulatory Branch Operations Division Attachment Copies Furnished: Betsy A. Kaemmerlen Fuss and O'Neill, Inc. 146 Hartford Road Manchester, CT 06040 Planning and Zoning Board Town Hall 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 ra 2 O FVSS&O'NBLL gonsulting engineers October 13, 1989 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director State of Connecticut Traffic Commission 24 Wolcott Hill Road P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Re: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor STC No. 132-8812-01 Dear Mr. Stoeckert: I am writing in response to your request for additional information dated June 9, 1989. We have included seven copies of the following items for your review: 1. Roadway Plan - Sullivan Avenue and Site Driveway, rev. 3/8/89. 2. Roadway Plan - Sullivan Avenue and Pierce Road, 10/9/89. The following responses correspond with the numbering of your comments: 1. As stated in our previous correspondence, the developer will continue to object to the condition requiring him to equitably participate in improvements at Wapping Five Corners. This objection will be addressed at the meeting of the State Traffic Commission (STC) in order to make it part of the official record. 2. A conceptual roadway plan has been prepared to incorporate the improvements recommended by the Office of Traffic Engineering for the intersection of Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) and Pierce Road. It is still the contention of the developer that this intersection should have been constructed to adequately handle the projected volumes when it was recently rebuilt. This objection wi11FCl�CI�EQ addressed at the STC meeting. 0 C T 1 31989 State Traffic Commissicn 146 HARTFORD ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 SOLID AA;-;':MANAGEMENT•WASTE WATER SYSTEMS•EROSION CONTROL•WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY anc DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING HIGHWAYS ,rd BRIDGES•SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE -n-CHITECTURE•TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC 9 PUBLIC WORKS %IA%AGEMENT•HYDROGEOLOGY FUSS&O'NMU Mr. William W. Stoeckert October 13, 1989 Page -2- 3. The proposed easement to the State is shown on the Roadway Plan as requested. We trust that the information included herein is sufficient for you to conclude your review. If you require any additional information, please contact us at any time. Very truly yours, ,4� Susan T. Smichenko, P.E. Transportation Engineer /smc cc: John Decker Marcia Banach Chief Gary K. Tyler 85-350 1009ASTS. 1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation Commissioner of Public Safety 24 Wolcott Dill Road • P.O. Drawer A Commissioner of Motor Vehicles Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone: 566-5228 October 18, 1989 Ms. Susan T. Smichenko Fuss & O'Neill 146 Hartford Road Manchester CT 06040 Re: STC# 132-8812-01 Dear Ms. Smichenko: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Town of South Windsor The additional data submitted with your October 13, 1989 letter is being forwarded to the Bureau of Highways' Office of Traffic Engineering to be incorporated into the review. You will be advised by this office if any additional information is required. Very truly yours, William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Gerber Scientific, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer TRA•10 REV 11187 Patrick J. Bush STATE OFCONNECTICUT S.T.C. No. 132-RR12-01 Report By DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Date 11/89 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc.No. REPORT TO THE Date to S.T.C. NOV2 0 1989 Checked By Barbara B. Ric oz i STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Date 11/89 TOWN South Windsor Received By S.T.C. LOCATION Gerber Scientific Date NOV z o 199 Route 194 Approved By S.T.C. REQUESTED BY Dat° NOV 21 1989 S.M. No. Gerber Scientific �J See Previous S.T.C. Report HOW REQUESTED Appl i cati on • for Certificate No. DATE 11/Z9/88 Executive Secretary Recommendations In accordance with Section 14-311 of the Connecticut General Statutes, .. as revised, issue a certificate to Gerber Scientific for the Gerber Scientific facility, on Route 194 in the Town of South Windsor, stating that the operation, thereof, will not imperil the safety of the public. This recommendation is referenced to the developer' s plans entitled: "Roadway Plan, Sullivan Avenue & Site Drive, Gerber Scientific, Inc." dated November, 1988 and revised March 7, 1989 by Fuss & O'Neill , Inc. "Sullivan Avenue & Pierce Road, Gerber Scientific" dated October 92 1989 by Fuss & O'Neill , Inc. and revised November 62 1989 by the Department of Transportation. This recommendation is based upon the following conditions: 1. That the site access drive be constructed as shown on the above referenced plans. 2. That the developer install and maintain a "Stop" sign, stop bar, double yellow center line and lane-use control signs and pavement markings on the site drive, as shown on the above referenced plan. 3. That the developer provide and maintain a clear sight line of 770 feet or more in each direction, from the site drive onto Route 194. The sight line is to be measured from a point 20 feet back from the projected edge of Route 194. OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS Town of South Windsor Gerber Scientific Route 194 STC No. 132-8812-01 Page 2 4. That the developer widen Route 194 to provide a sheltered left-turn lane, for northbound Route 194, at the site drive, as shown on the above referenced plan. 5. That the developer initially install all signs and pavement markings required by the construction of the sheltered left-turn lane on northbound Route 194, as shown on the above referenced plan. Upon the completion of installation, to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation, the State will maintain the signs and pavement markings on Route 194. 6. That the developer relocate the "Stop" sign and stop bar on Kennedy Road, as shown on the above referenced plan. 7. That the developer widen southbound Route 194 and Pierce Road to provide two lane approaches, as shown on the above referenced plan. 8. That the developer initially install the signs and pavement markings required by the widening at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection, as shown on the above referenced plan. Upon the completion of installation to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation, the State will maintain the signs and pavement markings on Route 194. 9. That the developer revise the existing traffic control signal at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection to accommodate the new geometry. Plans for the signal revision will be reviewed and approved in a separate report. 10. That if a traffic control signal becomes necessary, for the Route 194 Site Drive/Kennedy Road intersection, due to the development' s traffic the developer will be responsible for the installation. 11. That the developer construct the "emergency access" drive where shown on the above referenced plan and that the drive be designed and constructed to preclude casual use. - 12. That the developer equitably participate in any future project to construct an exclusive right turn lane on northbound U.S. Route 5 at it's intersection with Route 194. 13. That the developer equitably participate in funding for future improvements at the intersection of Routes 30, 74, 194 and Buckland Road to the extent necessary to adequately handle traffic generated by the Gerber Scientific facility. 14. That the developer provide an easement for highway purposes, to the State of Connecticut, where the development's property abuts the existing Route 194 right-of-way line, as shown on the above referenced plan. Div. of ROW File No. 132 mist 32 Town of South Windsor Gerber Scientific Route 194 STC No. 132-8812-01 Page 3 15. That all work within the State's right-of-way be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit by the Department's District I Office. 16. That all work on roadways owned and maintained by the Town of South Windsor be performed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the Town of South Windsor. .17. That all drainage requirements be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of an encroachmet permit by the Department's District I Office. 18. Where utilities are to be relocated, the utilities shall be moved in compliance with current Department of Transportation policy and at no cost to the State. 19. That within sixty (60) days of the issuance of a State Traffic Commission Certificate, a copy thereof together with this report be recorded on the municipal land records in accordance with the attached procedure. 20. That all signs and pavement markings conform to the standards contained in the latest edition of the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways". 21. That the State Traffic Commission reserves the right to require additional improvements or changes, as deemed necessary by the developments traffic in the future. The cost of any additional improvements or changes shall be borne by the owner of the development. The above conditions were reviewed with Sgt. Thomas Hart on November 17, 1989 and on behalf of Chief Gary Tyler, Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, he concurred with all items except No. 7. The Town feels Gerber Scientific should equitably participate in condition No. 7 and not be fully responsible. . Mr. Steve Mitchell , the developers authorized representative, was informed of the above recommendations on November 17, 1989 and concurred with all items except Nos. 7, 12, 13 and 21. • REPORT OF FINDINGS GERBER SCIENTIFIC ROUTE 194 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR SITE DESCRIPTION: Gerber Scientific has proposed a 302, 300 square foot expansion of their existing 97, 700 square foot facility on Route 194, Sullivan Avenue, in the Town of South Windsor (see attached site location map) . The expanded 400,000 square foot facility will house light manufacturing, research & development, warehousing and office space. Access to the site will be via one drive, opposite Kennedy Road onto Route 194. The expansion of Gerber Scientific has Town of South Windsor Planning and Zoning approval. SITE_GENERATED TRAFFIC: The site is expected to generate 2746 vehicle trips on an average day. The anticipated peak hour generated traffic will be 373 vehicles (306 enter, 67 exit) in the am and 350 vehicles (74 enter, 276 exit) in the pm. The expected directional distribution of site traffic onto Route 194 is 18% to the west and 82% to the east. The generated volumes and directional distribution has been reviewed and approved by the Bureau of Planning. SITE ENVIRONS AND IMPACT ANALYSIS Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) : Route 194 is a arterial / collector roadway that begins at it' s intersection with U.S. Route 5 and terminates at it' s intersection with Routes 30, 74 and Buckland Road (Wapping Five Corners) . The 1988 ADT for Route 194 is 16, 200 veh/day in the vicinity of Routes 30 & 74, 13, 500 veh/day in the area of the proposed site drive and 15, 900 veh/day as it nears U. S. Route 5. The posted speed limit on Route 194 varies f rom 40 to 45 mph. Route 194 has signalized intersections with Routes 30, 74 and Buckland Road, Sand Hill Road, Pierce Road, Sullivan Avenue Shopping Center and U.S. Route 5. The site generated traffic is not expected to exacerbate existing traffic conditions on the thru sections of Route 194. However, the traffic will have an impact on operations at several of the above mentioned signalized intersections (see below) . Route 194 / Route 30 / Route 74 / Buckland Road Intersection: This is a signalized five leg intersection that is currently over capacity during both the am and pm peak hours. The expansion of Gerber Scientific will add an additional 188 vehicles in the am peak and 176 vehicles in pm peak to this intersection. The increase in traffic will have an adverse impact on traffic operations at this location. Due to the difficult geometry of this location, it is not practicable for this developer to under take the improvements that would be required to offset the impact of site generated traffic. Therefore it is recommended that the developer equitably participate in funding for future improvements, to this location, to the extent necessary to adequately handle traffic generated by the expansion of the Gerber Scientific facility. Route 194 / Sand Hill Road Intersection: This is a T type intersection and is controlled by a semi actuated traffic signal. All three legs of this intersection have two lane approaches The Route 194 legs have one thru lane and an exclusive turn lane. The site generated traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on this intersection. Route 194 / Pierce Road Intersection: This intersection is T type with a semi actuated traffic control signal. The signal is interconnected with the signal at the Route 194 - Sand Hill Road intersection. Northbound Route 194 has a 12 foot wide exclusive left turn lane and a 12 foot wide thru lane. Southbound Route 194 and Pierce Road have 12 foot wide one lane approaches. Analysis using projected 1991 external traffic conditions indicate that this intersection will be over capacity during peak traffic hours. The development will add 299 vehicles in the am peak and 279 vehicles in the pm peak hour. To address this 12% - 15% increase in traffic it is recommended that a right turn lane for southbound Route 194 and a two lane approach for Pierce Road be constructed. These improvements will effectively offset the development' s impact at this location. It is understood that the developer of Gerber Scientific is responsible for the aforementioned widening of Pierce Road. However, prior to completion of the full-build Gerber Scientific complex, if there are other developers in the area, subject to State Traffic Commission review, which would impact the relevant traffic loads of the subject intersection, those development' s will be reviewed by the State Traffic Commission and may be required to equitably participate in the Pierce Road widening. Route 194 / Sullivan Avenue Shopping Center Intersection: This four leg intersection has recently been reconstructed by the Town of South Windsor. Route 194 has an exclusive left turn lane and a thru / right lane in each direction. The side roads have been realigned to provide a more conventional four leg intersection. Analysis indicates that the site generated traffic will not have a substantial impact on traffic operations at this location. Route 194 / Site Drive / Kennedy Road Intersection: Currently this is a four leg intersection that has stop control on the side streets. With the addition of the site generated traffic the peak hour warrant for signalization will be met. However, this is the only warrant that is met and the disruption of traffic flow on Route 194 is not expected. Therefore, the installation of a traffic control signal is not recommended at this time. It is recommended that if the installation of a traffic control signal becomes necessary, the developer be responsible for the installation. In order to accommodate the increase in traffic the developer will widen Route 194 to provide for a northbound exclusive left turn lane at the site drive. The site drive will also be widened to provide a two lane approach to Route 194. Route 194 / Rye Street Intersection: this is a T type stop controlled intersection. Review shows that the development will increase traffic at this location by approximately 2%. The generated traffic is thru traffic and is not expected to have a significant impact on traffic operations at this location. Route 194 / U.S. Route 5 Intersection: This is a four leg signalized intersection that currently operates at an acceptable level of service during peak hours. The development' s traffic will have an impact on the northbound U.S. Route 5 right turn movement. To offset this impact the developer has proposed the construction of a northbound right turn lane. However, due to difficulties with right-of-way it has been determined that this improvement can not be pursued at this time. It is recommended that the developer equitably participate in any future project to construct this improvement. ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE The latest three year accident experience for Route 194 in the vicinity of the development was reviewed and no accident pattern or trend was discovered. The U. S. Route 5 - Route 194 and Route 30, 74, 194 and Buckland Road intersections are No 345 and 557 on the 1985 - 1987 SLOSSS. These locations have been reviewed and the additional traffic generated by the development is not expected to exacerbate conditions. ERQPOSEPROJECTS BY THE DEPART ENT OF TRANSPORTATION Project 132-100: This planned project will provide for major widening of Buckland Road from the Manchester Town Line to Route 30. Tentative advertising date is 03/91. Project 132-102: This project proposes the relocation of 1400 feet of Route 74 to intersect with Route 194 approx. 1200 feet north of Route 30. Tentative advertising date is 01/91. DEVELOPER'S RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS The developer has recommended the improvements outlined in conditions No. 1 - 6 and 12 as listed in State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-8812-01 . OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS The Office of Traffic Engineering agrees with the improvements proposed by the developer and also recommends items No. 7 - 11 and 13 - 24 as listed in State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-8812-01 . The Office of Traffic Engineering and the Town of South Windsor are in agreement with the above conditions. However, the Town feels that the developer should not be fully responsible for but only equitably participate in the improvements to the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection. The developer' s authorized representative agreed with all conditions of State Traffic Commission Report No. 132-8812-01 except No. 7, 12, 13, and 21 . :zzk 001, +a aft C�l � '. ./ RYE ST Z10 BP o".0. • RMH IND ♦ J / r GER SCENT :jr' if Itv, It- K F BRICK CO \ :, _ _ ol 14% PROCEDURE FOR FILING CERTIFICATES ON LAND RECORDS Within sixty (60) days of the issuance of the Certificate, a copy thereof together with the Traffic Investigation Report is to be recorded, at no cost to the State of Connecticut, by the applicant on the land records of the municipality in which the parc-el of land encompassed by the Certificate is located. If the subject premises are situated in more than one municipality, a duplicate original of the Certificate and the Traffic Investigation Report must be recorded by the applicant, at no cost to the State of Connecti- cut, on the land records of each municipality. The municipal clerk shall list the "State of Connecticut" as the grantee of the Certificate in the municipal land record indices. A certified copy of the Certificate and Traffic Inves- tigation Report evidencing the date of recordation must be delivered to the Office of the State Traffic Commis- sion within the above specified sixty-day period. Failure to comply with the above will result in the revo- cation of the Certificate. August 1989 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS Commissioner of Transportation TRAFFIC COMMISSION commissioner of Public Safety Department of Transportation Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A -Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 ISSUED November 21 , 1989 CERTIFICATE NO. 993 ISSUED TO Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 - FOR Gerber Scientific Facility Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor pursuant to Section 14-311 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, as revised and the Regulations of the State Traffic Commission The applicant is hereby ordered to comply with the conditions and requirements as set forth in the attached report and plan$. Failure to comply with all conditions and the requirements Will constitute sufficient basis for revocation of the Certificate. NO PERSON SHALL OPERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PORTION THEREOF UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED WITH THE ABOVE UNLESS PERMISSION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO OPERATE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL EXPIRE ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE ISSUED UNLESS ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLIED WITH WITHIN THAT PERIOD OR PERMISSION IS REQUESTED AND OBTAINED FROM THE STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE: Upon due notice from this Commission, this Certificate may be reviewed and modified or revoked in the interest of public safety. J.WILLIAM BURNS CHAIRMAN / 4 7 Z. C/ z C� William W. Stoeckert Executive Director RE: CERTIFICATE 993 i STC REPORT 132-8812-01 r DIV. OF ROW FILE NO. 132 misc. 32 1. STC CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY AND/OR RIGHTS TO THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT The Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way has established a file and file number as shown above for the transfer of rights and/or property required by the subject State Traffic Commission certificate. A. The applicant will have a reproducible mylar conveyance map prepared to A-1 standard and the format of the Department of Transportation, signed and -sealed. The conveyance map shall conform to 12"xl8", 18"x24" or 2411x36" filing sizes as set forth by the Connecticut General Statutes. The Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way's file number shall be shown on the map. B. The applicant will submit a copy of the mylar to the Connecticut Department of Transportation's Office of Rights of Way for review of its conformance to the Right of Way condition set forth by the State Traffic Commission certificate. C. Upon the approval of the map, the applicant will have a certificate of title prepared certifying ownership of the property and listing all encumbrances on the property. D. The applicant will then have a deed and/or instrument prepared conveying the property and/or rights to the State of Connecticut and submit that proposed deed and/or instrument, the original certificate of title, and proposed partial releases of encumbrances to the transfer, to the Department's Office of Rights of Way for review and comments. E. Upon approval of all documents and the map, the applicant will proceed to have the instruments and partial releases executed then submit them to the Department's Office of Rights of Way for recording in the land records and storage. Sent To: Division Chief Administration Division Office of Right of Way CT. Dept. of Transportation 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 (203) 258-3349 *** It is important to note that no deeds and/or instruments should be executed without Department review first. OVER REV. 9/89 _2- - - r 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MONUMENTING AND MAPPING OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT IN CONNECTION WITH THE STC CERTIFICATE. A. The applicant shall have a Land Surveyor, licensed by the State of Connecticut mark the taking line and set Connecticut Department of Transportation boundary monuments (to be furnished by the State) at all angle points in the line. B. A class A-1 survey map shall be prepared on reproducible mylar showing the complete outline of the parcel to be acquired by the State; said map to be signed and sealed by the licensed surveyor. This is the same map referred to in Section 1, Paragraph A of these requirements. C. The above required monumenting and mapping shall be done in accordance with the Connecticut D.O.T. manual entitled "Specifications for Monumenting and Mapping of State Highways". REV. 9/89 - ( ..7 STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of p Trans ortation Commissioner of Public Safety Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A �''�"'�w:��� Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone: 566-5228 November 27, 1989 Gerber Scientific, Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Sir: Subject: Gerber Scientific Facility Sullivan Avenue - Route 194 Town of South Windsor Certificate No. 993 and Traffic Investigation Report No. 132-8812-01 detailing conditions of the Certificate are enclosed. An encroachment permit must be obtained from the Bureau of Highways - District No. 1 office at 1107 Cromwell Avenue - Town of Rocky Hill prior to performing any work within the state highway right-of-way. In addition, the enclosed procedure for the transfer of property and/or rights to the State of Connecticut should be followed to satisfy Condition No. 14, also enclosed is the procedure for filing certificates on Land Records to satisfy Condition No. 19. Very truly yours, William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler ` Mr. Thomas D'Auria is Planning and Zoning Commission Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer FUSS&OT*JBLL consulting engineers { December 20, 1989 Mr. William W. Stoeckert Executive Director RECEIVED State of Connecticut Traffic Commission 24 Wolcott Hill Road DEC 2 21989 P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 State Traffic Corrmissicn Re: Gerber Scientific South Windsor, CT Certificate No. 993 Mr Gerber Scientific, c. is pursuing site plan approval from the Ir Town of South Windsor for Building No. 2, as shown on their plan. This building will be 90,000 S.F. and when master completed, the Gerber site will then total 187,700 S.F. 93 on thebasiseofe recall that the STC issued Certificate ota1sN4009000 S.F. the completed Master Plan, which t Gerber Scientific is planning to construct t993roadwa Route 194 improvements, stipulated in Certificate This at their site drive in conjunction with this mize bfutaregimpacts on improvement will be made in order to mini in traffic along Route 194. Construction is scheduled to begin the Spring of 1990- d in the certificate as Item No. 7, is the widening of Inclu,.e on behalf of Route 194 and Pierce Road. We are requesting, S.F. Gerber Scientific, permission to op We uest building without compliance with conditionatNthis�time,rdue to that this improvement not be conheuc 90,000 S.F. the minimal traffic impact that proposed building will have on this intersection. The attached Table and Figure indicate the number of trips expected and the distribution of these trips along Route 194- The improvements at: the Sullivan Avenue and Pierce than Site P development intersection will 4e pursued as the develop continues. 146 HARTFOR D ROAD / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TEL. (203) 646-2469, FAX. EXT. 307 WASTE MANAGE"r1ENT•'HASTE'N�T ER SYSTEMS•=;CSION CONTROL a WATER SYSTEMS•HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS•SITE PLANNING SOLID � � -"CiJ'URE • -R;yS?'JRTATION end TRAFFIC• PU6L'C'.VORKS MANAGEMENT•HYDROGEOLDG _ _ _ � , .r Report By Patrick J. Bush STATE CC S.T.C.No. 132-8912-05 r PARTMER,rl OF TRANS=ORTATION Date 1/90 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Loc.No. Checked By Barbara B. Ri coz i REPORT TO THE Date to S.T.C. AN i 11990 STATE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Date 1/90 TOWN South Windsor Received By S.T.C. LOCATION Gerber Scientific Date JAN i 1 1990 Route 194 Approved By S.T.C. REQUESTED BY Date JAI 17 1990 S.M. No. Gerber Scientific See Previous S.T.C. Report HOW REQUESTED Letter .•ll� No. 132-8812-01, Cert. No.99 DATE 12/20189 Executive Secretary Recommendations It is recommended that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate an additional 909000 square feet, for a total of 187,700 square feet, without compliance to condition Nos. 7-9 of previously issued Certificate No. 993. All other conditions of Certificate No. 993 remain valid. -Sgt. Thomas Hart was informed of the above recommendation on January 8, 1990 and speaking on behalf of Chief Gary Tyler, Legal Traffic Authority for the Town of South Windsor, he concurred. Mr. Robert Bass, the developer's authorized representative, was informed of the above recommendation on January 8, 1990 and he concurred. Existing Conditions: In November of 1989 Certificate No. 993 was issued for the Gerber Scientific development on Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) in the Town of South Windsor, to expand the existing 100,000 square foot facility by 300,000 square feet. In a December 20, 1989 letter, the developer's representative requested that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate 90,000 square feet (for a total of 187,000 square feet) of the proposed 300,000 square foot expansion without compliance to Condition Nos. 7-9 of Certificate No. 993. Condition Nos. 7-9 require the developer to make improvements to the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection. Review indicates that the 90,000 square foot addition will generate an additional 107 vehicles (88 enter, 19 exit) in the a.m. peak and 85 vehicles (18 enter, 67 exit) in the p.m. peak. The increase in traffic at the Route 194 - Pierce Road intersection due to the 90,000 square feet is 82 vehicles in the a.m. and 59 vehicles in the p.m. While the additional traffic will impact traffic operations at this location, an unacceptable level of service is not anticipated. Therefore, it is recommended that Gerber Scientific be allowed to construct and operate an additional 90,000 square feet, for a total of 187,700 square feet and 515 parking spaces without compliance with condition Nos. 7-9 of State Traffic Commission Certificate No. 993. BY OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF CONNECTICUT MEMBERS s�l TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Transportation Department of Transportation Commissioner of Public Safety 24 Wolcott Hill Road • P.O. Drawer A Commissioner of Motor Vehicles "ur r Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Phone : 566-5228 January 22, 1990 Gerber Scientific Inc. 83 Gerber Road West South Windsor CT 06074 Dear Sir: Subject: Gerber Scientific, Inc. Sullivan Avenue - Route 184 Town of South Windsor Attached is a copy of Traffic Investigation Report 132-8912-05 detailing conditions to operate the subject facility without full compliance to the Certificate. This report is being forwarded to you as a result of the investigation conducted by the Department of Transportation and approval by the State Traffic Commission. Very truly yours , William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Au r1a Planning and Zoning Commission Fuss & O'Neill An Equal Opportunity Employer [0wN 0 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 !~�soR•co�'� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 10 Oct. 1990 Mr. Dory MacKennin Gerber Scientific 151 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06040 Dear Mr. MacRennin: re: Gerber Scientific $10,000 IWA/CC Bond This is to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on 11 September 1990 to release the IWA/CC Bond. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s) will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, Ext. 251. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Marshall Montana Chairman cc: M. Banach, Director of Planning MEMBERS STATE OF CONNECTICUT r ' Commissioner of Transportation TRAFFIC COMMISSION Commissioner of Public Safety Department of Transportation Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 24 Wolcott Hill Road - P.O. Drawer A Wethersfield. Connecticut 06109-0801 Phone: 566-5228 November 21 , 1990 Mr. John L. Decker Facilities Mananger Gerber Scientific, Inc. P.O. Box 305 Hartford CT 06141-0305 Dear Mr. Decker: Subject: Gerber Scientific Facility - Certificate No. 993 Route 194 Town of South Windsor The State Traffic Commission at their meeting of November 20, 1990 granted a one-year time extension for Certificate No. 993. Please keep this office informed of the progress of completing the conditions and requirements of the Certificate. Your cooperation will be appreciated. Very truly yours , William W. Stoeckert Executive Director cc: Chief Gary K. Tyler Mr. Thomas D'Auria Fuss & O'Neill , Inc. An Equal Opportu►it.v Etnplo.yer Printed on ru%t led or re(ov ered Paper 1 _ EAST W IN DSOR, PLUM At 4j AYE sr BEET tr`rr h ar a swemotfic 1 ® ry f it e, ar�� pd o e tt T ww6 ►L •� 1 Cpl f OVER I Alq f r 8 V F Z3� N � •toy '' "0' w� H E 3 Z � I ry 0 O� ••• rOwM �\ +•• r •• •l•+•• CENTER C[M � •! �e4 FUSS&OWEILL MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT / NICIN17Y MAP LI•R"r 1' , GERBEK SG i eNT 1 F I C, INC. SULLIVAN AVENGE 1• ° - I« SOUTH W INDSOK CT' / POND 1 MA N PROJ.NO.$5-330 DATE: 5•ZZ'$9 SCALE N0NE f JD 1 I � Acz,Es S -= -- -----SU LIVAN----- ------ W------ — ---- ------- ---- - --- fo m l�/ lu b 0 � t S / 0 ST- 3 C 1 - 0 1 / 63 N/F J.R D W Z F Q 63- T � 1 W1+TLANPs SEE Ioo �; �Q /�. SGI►I..E P DET NTION - IM Ex1wIN DIT y -— 7PIl,L,V1/�Y` cN .� FUSS801M IL U MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT Pl-^N ' GERBER SCIENTIFIC) INC. SUL L I VAN AVENUE t SOUTH WINDSOR, CT r—pmm-NO.66-35O DATE: 5•*Z-00 SCALE: I"s$Yr Y RCP so - it per_ Z4 6-7 tt q � . 14 S�•N O b2 r°�Wa a ' so �u - vv '64 :.# .. karma*. Ll WIFE 6y t 02 obcoy— t r fmo.70.69 - f TOG i ( lip 1 �'PINE TPEAf d�I .•. / ^'► / I / LUMP n j 12�OAK / 4"MPUS Ow — A I P SAW �•�ti�0 ��J• 1 Q LIMIT DF / P A NYE1,0 CATr,-P) 67 26 / .r :Y`' •D�7'eH7,ION•. imv 76 7Z LP .. ... / I � f rOP� ,�ti 1 S• o/ f'� FUSSMYNEILL r MANCHESTER, CONNECTICUT :I SfrIL.I,•WAY WlSTL.^NDS IMPACT GERBER SCIENTIFIC, INC. SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CT N PROd•NO•b5-350 DATE: 5•99'09 SCALE: I'*IOb� _. . ; WETLANDS _ ' PROPOSED GRADE $0 :_. 80 EXISTING GRADE --+ NEW D ETENT. TQ 48 R�C•P AREA _ r - � �� APPROX. EXIST. � . 54 R�C.P. POND WE.. 67.2 INV.67.3 I NV 68.3 60 SEDI MENTATION CHAMBER 60 EQUALIZER PIPE WETLANDS CROSSING PIPE PROFILE ,- : a4 + GERBE R SCIENTIFIC INC. SULLIVAN AVENUE ' SOUTH WINDSOR CT. :s; t ' FIJSSMYNEILL: MANCMESTER, CONNECTICUT _wyf r Mi.N0. .Ins I 0 H. 83-3�0 DATE �-22-89_SCALE I ___ -