Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUBDIVISION, OPEN SPACE (5) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIQN APPLICATION FORM1-12 C •�- , App. No. O D 07 Date Received: IMPORTANT! Action or Public Heari planning and Engineering Department staff VMTWPV��f require 14 days to determine application Receipt No. complettaess. To ensure receipt of a complete application by PZC, it is strongly recommended that the application be submitted JAN 15 19�� 14 days prior to the Regular Meeting at which it will be received. South Windsor & Zoning Commission APPLICANT: TWUR ava Construction Company - ADDRESS: 185 Silas Deane Highway, Wethersfield, CT 06109 TELEPHONE: 563-3711 OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS:— The LaCava Construction Company ADDRESS: 185 Silas Deane Highway, Wethersfield, CT 06109 COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Easterly side of Felt Road and Northers y girt. of Krawski Drive ZONE: AA-30 NAME, ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO W10M. INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED: Attorney Peter Jay Alter 155 Sycamore Street, Glastonbury, CT 06033 _ TEL'EPHONE:659-0569 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check one of *he following) I. Zone Change to (public hearing requ ; e�.;) 2. Subdivision r x 3 . Open Space Subdivision (public hearing reqt 4. Resubdivision (public hearing required) *..r. 5. Special Exception to Article (publi`C", hdarir4 required) 6 . Site Plan of Development ®' 7. Earth Filling (Section 10 ) and/or Earth Removal (Section 9 ) (public hearing required) 8. General Plan of Development 9 . Regulation Amendment: Zoning Subdivision 10 . Other (explain in detail) THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY- AND SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICATE WITH SIB{ SETS OF THE MAPS (7 if public hearing is required) .AND OTHER DOCUMENTS (see page ,. THE LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BY ` w e'rjAppiicant side) 1 /1 4/8 7 (see reverse x . TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM This application is complete and ready for Planning & Zoning Commission receipt only upon submission of all required documentation, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following items. -Not all items are required with every application. See applicable sections of the South Windsor zoning and subdivision regulations for specific requirements. APPLICATION CHECKLIST X 1. Key Map 2. Architectural Elevations/Floor Plans X 3. Completed application form (in triplicate) X 4. Required fees X 5. Zone Change, Site Plan, Subdivision, Open Space Improve- ment, and/or General Plan of Development maps , in accordance with regulations. (Six sets - seven if public hearing require, X 6. Plans & Prof iles/Drainage Calculations X 7. Conservation Plan 8. Landscaping Plan X 9 . Traffic Engineering Report 10. Narrative Statement 11. Sanitary Report 12. Copy of agreement to purchase land (if not the owner) 13 . Other ALL PROSPECTIVE APPLICANTS ARE URGED TO CONFER WITH TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND ENGINEERING BUREAU STAFF PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSION. CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE. i11�/R7 CHECKLIST REQUIRED INFORMATION SUBDIVISIONS & RESUBDIVISIONS This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P . E/L. S) declaring that all required information is provided . Items 1-5 are required for all applications ; Items 6-9 required where appropriate . Check mark for each item supplied . V 1 . On each sheet for plans or maps , title block with the following information : a. Name and address of subdivider. b . Name and address of Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer . V/ C . Name of subdivision. d . Date when drawings were made. North arrows L2. Key Map - An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet , which can be used as an overlay on Metropolitan District Maps . This map will show the / overall design of the subdivision and will include: ✓ a. Layout of streets with names b. Layout of lots and lot numbers C. Open space land d . Arrows indicating general direction of drainage e. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system flow ✓ f . Total acreage of subdivision g. Total number of lots h. Names of surrounding property-owners , and properties within 500 feet of the site 3. Plot Plan : A layout map of the proposed subdivision drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the following size sheets - ( 1 ) 25" X 37" with a 3/4" ruled margin ; ( 2) 15" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin - containing the following data: A cl � ,�uuu . reSUU . J 1 ✓ a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines. b. Lot layout numbers square footage ootage of all lots, and all lot dimensions . Iron pins to be shown at all lot angle points. Lots should not be fragmented onto separate sheets except where size is prohibitive . c. Proposed P streets and street lines with center line stations , and curve data . d . Building lines in accordance with zoning regulations. e. Easements, noting grantors , grantees and purpose . f. Proposed names of street . g . Dames of abutting property-owners. h. Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles of all streets and at all points of curvature and tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan District Commission points , or other coordinated points , the monumented points within proposed subdivision shall be coordinated . These coordinates shall -appear in tabular form on the Plot plan . The accessibility of these MDC points shall be determined by the Town Engineer. i. All open space reserved for parks , playgrounds, or other common or public uses shall be indicated . j . A-2 Certification , P . E. /L. S . Seal. k. Traffic control signs and 8 pavement markings required by Traffic Authority. 4. Topographic p graphic Map.- A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to 40 feet on sheets not exceeding 25 inches by 37 inches including ruled margins and shall , in addition to the / requirements of the plot plans , show the following : a: All existing and build 'proposed ings. b. Curb lines and pavement width sidewalks.e alks. C. Existing and proposed sanitary and storm sewers, if any. d . Existing and proposed water and as main / g systems . e. Present wooded areas indicated by a "foliage line" . Any individual trees to be saved should be shown. f . Existing and proposed contours shall be shown at not less than two-foot intervals ; but in cases of relatively level land , the contours shall be one-foot intervals . g. Proposed storm drainage system showing all catch basins , endwalls, manholes , lengths, and sizes of pipes. (Minimum distance between catch basins shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain lines shall be 15 inches . ) h. Connections of all springs into proposed storm / drainage system as needed . ✓ i . Location and indications of existing brook channels , and 100 year flood limits. v j . A-2 Certification ; P . E. /L. S . Seal ✓ k. Regulated wetlands and 100-year flood plain or note that site contains none. 5. Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per attached guidelines. ✓ 6. Plans and Profiles : A plan and profile of the proposed streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to 40 feet horizontally and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically on sheets not exceeding 25 inches by 37 inches including ruled margins and containing the following : ✓ a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by stations with thg profile . V b . Street plan showing roadways , drainage and partial lot lines. C. Sight line at street intersections . d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished grades . Roadway profile will show all tangent grade and all vertical curve information . e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage lines between catch basins with all invert and top of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown and described as to material . f . Typical/critical cross-sections where grading is outside street right-of-way or is at street right-of-way. g. Where any storm drainage line discharges into an existing brook, sufficient profile of this brook will be shown to determine conditions. h. Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be used on all subdivisions accessible to controls. The Town Engineer shall , based on standard engineering practices, determine the accessibility of these controls. i . Profiles shall show all sanitary-'- y sewer lines and manholes , including elevations, sizes, lengths , and slopes of pipes. Top of foundation elevations for houses shall be shown . 7. Traffic Re port 8. Open Space Site Improvement Plans : For subdivisions which require a provision for open spaces, a plan which contains data for site improvement may be required . This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch equals 20 feet. 9. Sanitary Report : Where individual sanitary sewage disposal systems are proposed , the final plans shall include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional Engineer . The report shall demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed individual systems . The report should deal with the area as a whole , discussing the following points ; a. General nature and development of surrounding area . b. Topography and natural drainage pattern . C. Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface investigation , including soil absorption characteristics, ground water level conditions, ledge rock , and general nature of soil . d . General description of type of development contemplated - noting type of house , number of bedrooms per unit , etc . e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage disposal facilities, indicating sizes for various ground conditions, materials to be used , and general layout pattern to be used , etc . f . Special precautions that may be necessary to provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal systems. g . Map of general area with locations of all tests shown on proposed lot layouts. h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or rivers. i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section 3. 2.a(6) . i All information required above is included in this application at the time of submission. LAN PREPARER (P.E. November, 1987 DA T E D � MAY 188 South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission RIDGEFIELD OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION I. Lot Analysis Original Total Area - (Owned by Krawski prior to any sales) 64.42 Ac Foster Street Lots - (Conventional Lots 1-4) ( 2.84 Ac) Town Open Space - (Granted by Highgate Subdivision) ( 4. 66 Ac) Balance of Parcel as Ridgefield Open Space Plan I, II, III, IV 56.92 Ac In accordance with Section 5.3a. of South Windsor Zoning Regulations deduct 10% ( 5. 69 Ac) Net Acreage 51.23 Ac Calculation in Accordance with 5.3a. 51.23 Ac. x 43.560 per acre 30, 000 square feet 2,231,578.80 square feet 30,000 square feet 74 . 39 lots permitted Lot Recap Section I - LaCava 15 Lots II - LaCava 17 Lots III - Krawski (Proposed, not approved) 9 Lots IV - LaCava 25 Lots Lots 21 and 22 not otherwise included 2 Lots Total 68 Lots Lots proposed or approved equal six (6) less than permitted by the regulation. II. Open Space Analysis Proposed Open Space to be dedicated excluding parcel dedicated as part of Highgate Subdivision (4. 66 Ac) 10. 1 Ac Total Open Space Parcel = 56.92 Ac Deduct proposed Open Space = (10. 10 Ac) Deduct Roadway Areas = ( 5. 10 Ac) Balance utilized as lots = 41.72 Ac 41.72 Ac. x 43,5601acre 26,725 square feet 68 Lots in average size lots 30,000 square feet -- 26,725 sq. feet = 3,275 sq. foot lot reduction 31275 square feet x 68 = 222,700 sq. feet or 5. 12 acres total reduction (8.99% on total acreage) Calculation pursuant to 5.3c. 3,275 10.91% reduction 30, 000 in lot area 56.92 Ac. x .1091 = 6.21 Acres Open Space required 10.1 Ac provided since that is greater than acreage equal to same percentage of the entire tract as that by which Lot area has been reduced. 10. 1 Ac. V. 6.21 Acres In addition, although not necessary, both conditions of 5.3c. (1) and 5.3c. (2) are met. Total Area Original Parcel 64 .42 Ac Town Open Space 4.66 Ac Approved Lots 1-4 Foster Street 2.84 Ac Conventional Subdivision Gross Area Remaining 56.92 Ac 10% 5.69 Net Area 51.23 Maximum Number of Lots 51.23 x 43.560 30,000 74.4 Lots (Max Permitted) Section I 15 Lots Section II 17 Lots Section III (Proposed, not approved) 9 Lots Section IV 25 Lots Lots 20 and 21 2 Lots Total Lots Proposed 68 Lots Proposed Open Space Requirements: Gross Area 56.9 Open Space (10.1) Rights of Way 5. 1 Developed Ac. 41.7 41.7 (Ac. Dev. ) x 43.560 26,725 AVG LOT 68 SIZE 30,000 26,725 3,275 Lot Reduction S.F. 3 ,275 30,000 = 10.91% 56.92 x .1091 = 6.21 Ac. Required Minimum Open Space = 10 Ac. Open Space Provided = 10. 1 Ac. RIDGEFIELD IV -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS KEY MAP Where are arrows indicating direction of drainage flow shown on legend? PLOT PLAN Need note that all lots conform to 10,000 squarefeet buildable area requirement Lots should be shown in their entirety on one sheet (lots 55, 59) Setbacks should be coincident with easements (lots 57, 58) Identify to whom easements grante Monuments are required at all angle points of open space land Traffic control signs as required by Traffic Authority (Police Chief) must be identified Street centerline stations required TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Show pavement width Wooded areas? show foliage line Drainage rights acquired from Town of South Windsor? GENERAL COMMENTS Open space improvement plan needed It appears that open space identified on key map as parcels 90 and 92 is to be deeded to the Town as part of this application. If so, the key map should show the 500" limits commencing from the boundaries of the open space. If this application is approved with the road configuration as presented, the sidewalks on Foster Drive must be connected. EXHIBIT E PLANNING & ZONING EOMMISSION - 6 - June 23, 1987 ' 9 . By copy of this letter , we are advising the adjacent owners that if the arrangements which have been made arepnoty satisfactory to them, they should get in touch with this Commission within 14 days after receipt of this letter . 10. Helicopter rides to be conducted duringµb` daylight hours only . 11 . The fireworks area is to be cordoned off 500' from Point where fireworks are set off , the actual 12 . The helicopter rides area is to be cord landing area . oned off 75 ' from the 5 . Discussion of Rid efield road concept subdivision . Attorney Peter Alter from Glastonbury, re resent presentation was for a connector road extending Ridgefielda Dr.• His Foster St . Atty Alter expressed the need for t into Windsor to require by eminent domain the slope rightsn of South that a retaining wall along the south and north side of to mentioned he road would be needed and this wall would be as much as 10' in height . road would be a ramp , from back in the open space out toward F The _ St . The elevation must by 20 feet to match the existin s Foster Foster St . Also , the intersection of this street and Or grade at Drive would be misaligned , chard Hill .� There were several local residents from the area who o thruway of this road . They presented a opposed the as Exhibit E . petition , which is attached The Town Planner indicated tht the engineeri Y � 4 b cons and seem to preclude the road extensionevennthoughttheex are severe = badly needed , g the extensions is ' 7 re Mrs . Evans mentioned that Krawski Dr. would have been a be 1 for the through road , tter place Atty . Alter told the Commission that he would like some of them to come down to the site for an observation, 1r; to 6 . Discussion of E . Hartford Sand and Gravelkr; for Earth Removal , fo The Commission requested that the sequence be phased . It w that East Hartford Sand & Gravel is leavin as noted to the water table . They are going down 8g and not down R 24" of gravel , g imum of Mrs . Montana wanted to know how far back from Rout paved and Mr . Silvestri from EH Sand And Gravel e 5 the road was 150 ' , replied that it was b _. 1 `4 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION -4- JULY 28 , 19 P 5 . Discussion of Ridgefield Road Concept . 6 Mrs . Evans suggested using a loop instead of a through road . She also 7 explained that some lots may have to be sacraficed and that the advanta of a loop is that it can come back out again . Atty . Peter Alter , from Glastonbury , stated that it would be impossible to bring the road out t Foster Street . Mrs . Montana stated that sidewalks should be addressed Birch Hill Drive residents at the time of the application. Public participation included Mr . Randy Buttero of 122 Foster Street wh 8 was concerned about condemnation of property and exactly what the procedure was. Mrs . Evans explained that was the purpose of a Public Hearing and the Commission would have to decide about that at that time 9 6 . Discussion of Veilleux Enterprises , Inc. , Chapel Green Site 1� Development Plan 16. 4 acres located southerly of Route 5 John Fi Boulevard) , westerly of Chapel Road and northerly of Ellin ton Road Mrs . Montana requested she be disqualified from participating on this = T' application . Mr . Hart sat as her alternate . 1 Mr . Greg Montana explained that there is 4, 400 s. f . of office space an 27 , 600 total building space . He then outlined the landscaping plan an 2 noted that the building is 24 feet in height . He stated that there is '- feet clean storage space and the building does not have a tenant as of Mi yet . He stated that there are 41 parking spaces provided. Mrs . Evans Rc asked if a second building were to go in , where would it go . Mr . Monts replied that they had secured an easement with Twin Manufacturing whit we J(, involves a 26 foot strip . 21 Town Planner , Ms . Banach, commented as follows : MI 1 . 27 , 600 foot building , 16 . 5 acre site , old drive-in site. Building M) height = 24' to eaves ; impervious coverage = 9. 4%. Surrounded by 81 zone . Mi 2 . Required parking = 41 spaces ; 41 spaces provided, plus 2 loading d ac M1 and one loading space . de 3. The issue with this site is the proximity of this driveway to Rout Tt - Chapel Road traffic goes up quite far during peak hours and vehi cc will have a difficult time making a left turn from the site onto Chapel Road . It would be quite undesirable for vehicles to queue Mr across the E-bound lane of Chapel Road when trying to exit from th site . 1• 4. Applicant understands that there cannot be future development on t parcel served by this driveway, and that any future development ca ', r.. connect through this driveway . 5 . Water and sewer are available. - ; a. ae • --- �--— N/G.�y�G�T..�._:� ,: •ate--•-- �-r_ : __.� '_ _. ._ ... ; • � ��!. . - -- • t_ ..- .. ! it -- i '-. � � "'. � � I .• . sou TN 010?i._.CiN�i VA � -- ... - .� 11111� � • 1 _ Fur,w l�,�fLo.�✓• P_,c,�1;�_ 'i � �r --:•-_ i tA CrIs '� . ;.�: . . .. i ' I 47 -- ... . '-•r;. �r f r...- r-_•-�'-'•t i � . t{ 1,. 1 I 1 . r I; �`•� 1 r 1 �T I: 1 � ' 1 ' l I •�T 1 1 �_ r 1 .`:I � -- -�'�••I I. r. t• •. � ' �; 1 I' I► �; ..1' ...'' 'r _1 �.�.�.{..'�'��r�'::+ 1:.1 I..n'1 •r..• •.{ 1 I ..' 1 •/L .t _.-r • '... ' .t .. .:t :' ,_.. { _ �'.. _:..�r._ I .11 .r.�:..1 Lll� .�.�• T+{ .T' �' 1 .' •II •� :' ( ( !t ' , • 1 1 , • , I ' I1 , • r I' 1 � III• 1 I �, _,•'I+ �,11- ��' 1 .•_L� 11 t �1 l r I r_-._.--T-'f";..":---•�f---,--•; - �-----�t__:.1._.._ I• 1 .. � 1 ; .. ,,••-+ r�•'�'-;•11 i:r � � !�� i r 1 ,r,'i ;' t..� :i ;{ � ;� �;; :1; :i 1I •�' ...5 t L_ i�i. � 11 � :. �: 1;�. '�L:- ! ..I:u: ' 11 '' _t ;�1 +�' Tr 1; �' :1_. .; .-..�f.1...�:1! :� F .�_--'�T- +ram ,•J - 1 ..._ �"1•. 1• 1 ... 1 -, ,r: -'�r '-1~'� r-• �•11111 fi .1 fir! 4':: � ,i �1.'L�1-ii },- 1"' j'�• + i �I � :. ..1 • S ~1' ♦ _1 1 {+ 1 1{I r� , •'♦ � 1 1 i! r t • , �, ' �'1 ' 1. '., r 1 (t ! i' f t (L-', 1 tl �~• ?•' { II -I ' .. t' « 11' ' ' !- .1 11 � �-• { r , { 1 t 1 1 I 1' Ifs _ _�.-*""� _.a�"'+ (�-_- I r- 'r r: __`�' y�T _]� 1r, 1 1. 'r 1 1 ! �� i 1 ��{'1 r 1 A i+•y T' 1' r •-� -i-• *;-, r' , -- , , ,i ' t '. . /,� F;'` �� ' ; ) i t T -; ,y, .1 ( . t•; 1 i r/ 1 r! t J:I ; 1 1 _ I I._ • ' -� +I_ I •_ -•y r �_---) rl-. T ._ '♦'•�� it � : -1�. y .-}-^ ; 1 1, �.:1 �..•.r_♦+ 1 + F i l T.! : , 1 •• ( • 1 .-• �.- �� T 1 ^1 1 tl '1 1/.. ) 1'I�1 1- .• ..•II' II' j, 1 l'r�' 1• � � 1 1 1 I ,1 • 1 1 .� : +- ,r - i_'! t' I :.r I/ 'I 1 I t 1 � �I �r J ; •' t� (� l�'1 '.r�7; I j 1 .,i�• I 1 !:; .� 1_� f _- __I..r1_�_'t -�.-a 1 Wit- /_�r -"'�•. l�_,••1 ' .' ; ..I ii 1• I 1 1 r � + I y' I 1,1'� «,; '/,{rr+ �y L�l 111 t I,'t 1 1 •�i -. '..a. :�• r�• y i �,.,. �-• T ^ ' _ •..�:_ -_.--1'.► '_ r -.11� :+a�,- --11-t-'-�-._1l«•.-. �' r'r' � I 1 /�I p'. �. µ.me ."� i •1 ( ! r• .,'=;. r I' `r ,;)'._ 1 `yi}, 1 ! �1 ""t 1 I l• 1 1 i}.I.� �4 1 1J .11•1 �•I I ( !'+.it i;^ : it li.J it lr I .. I _ , I ' , 1 I 1 ., ,I .. ., 1 i j��7 1 1 ; 1 1 1 { 1 r i � , �1 l T r� r �-•-•a•►r.�_ _ - • .. �• 1 1 I.l .. II i .l ,I � 1 f '�'►''`'�} ,. , , I, 1, I r• I r 9�1` I • 'T7-71 _ r* �fi 1I1 . ( ! j 1y;�-+ ,1.'� : I� f l, I ,1 1'1 ���F -' I t') �t•• :r; 4 �, n 'iT i.:-:! . �++��: L •y,� I •• t' ! {,.., Ir7 ,•- �._:.:: LLi� �....:..�: _� r-11..1... r-••r•��--T 1,'t' +++++++---a���,-+++►►►--'�L-+.'1►►►--- ! r r 1:•~I I` 1 �r• 1 -41 :� � '• I 111 'I •;' ' '� )t 7ty- T'r:l' 1•• � .r. ••;..f. •- •�-. 1. • I-�+t 1 'I Li I.rt' .J t l u ,!''.) 'T 1 I'/� •-�...i ' ` - 1 1 ')- I , .•ter;1-r' « •y . 4 t 1 �"•i- 1`1 F I •l. Y r r 1 i i ' 't•y f I _i , '1 i rbJ a r r t•11•) -ram 1"1 - • ' r I . .•, ,� t Tw I I J. _ •. ./.a_ w J..r' ' _.r -r •' , �•y rJ l. 1 l I. •+�`. ny.. 1 •.•,t / 1•�l�T� 1 +� ♦ -. '•. ♦ yam' "'j1.a .. 1 ry 1 /I 1yr r f1• «•_" 1 ') 1 111 .1111 r- , -T •t- �V . \j •. , .' 7.1 t r• 1«+ t ; _I ►i1 '' •1 ' .1, 1 1 1 !'�'y1�{ I.-1 i •I 1 ' 1 1 I 1 I r l I •�'�,I�r. t. J j • 1 1.1 1 -`!' •i l ,♦ I•. .,. r. ' ••, ;J ••1 } 1�1/ ' i:t ,H '� t"1 t !�.1J•i 1 7 1 1 -i � - ��•.-••� , - r- - •'�T 1 f • �, I ,- , I v• 1 �•,r h• ,' _i ` '1.. 1 '}I ' ( -1, :• 1 j 1{ 1 1 I--•F '!•, r .. 1 t : 1 '--t .. '� iI- , .. �.. '•:l , '� tl- `^' 1 i.J +1 l� ,.. . t •-t r �� r' •r �,' _,�_ t1 j' r .. i 'r - !� I t71: ! f:-� :t '. '._}.�1-1 ',-• r T r '1 � 1•• -j r 1 rJ� r :,I:•_ �yY r :1 -�T ��,1 �1T_ •� -•� �' ' �i :�J---1..�.. _-r...-�-�.�{�-•' �.y •_`'�r.�= ;.+ -,•�1� --f-r--��••� 1} :. �r.,•r-� t - ' r 'a 1�� � Lr'j' .'�.T: .�-r ' ..�- •� � �.-'� ,r* I r t.-..`1 .rr~� -- - ' - 111111 +++..•••fff------••• y -:..L Y �-•,7-� ., 1 -; 4 i+i ,+Hrr(i I�i y-' ••' T i r ( 1-r' r�1• I•.-. 1,� 'I' 1 i�1 i 1•'a-1 '1 1 y .�• .1- •�- .� �•' ,• , ',;I�`,y � `r _ _' + _• •i t11 r 11•f, '-/ :�i .�� t..� 1 ') '��}�• i ��.I{ �. t7 t ��+ r,r � 't�_,,,,..�'S.,� 1,r' �1 �) +' YI- �_ !.Il �„�r �-T- .�.�'"_1 �� ! .� '1 '(/yl .�_ �'�� --1 +i•' '1 t, + f i 1 i T . 4 r i y � •-' � ! ''� � I t� r r ��-. •�-� i ' ( �- `./ I, , -, .1• .- �-} �- --r�_'�•-1 I ~I ' I _ ' T+I •'•�•t� a.T•y_.-,+. •1T� n ._�l,lr. '. 1 - , � •�• •. ' i. ..r•-�J11 'Ir ♦ l• �^ li_• 1 r-i+T-•-' �T : •{ fit•' .,-1. �'i ;•'1 '! I tl •,Itl -,r,••IJ. . 'r 1+ ' / : r l I r• t. T I I I' Y f' t 1 i s , i•(l •-'. } �'.; t.�/- r i l i l J 1 .4 /-, 1 i r•' 11 1 I I ,;, ) -r .. 1 r' }•� I I ~ 'l+ 1 r .�� r f I t, , rj t `1 t.�. -, •� 1 1 , .j';1:1'� ' i. '~�•t�r11 ' ' !yl ; •`•♦ . � 't ��� .J :O �• .,. * „� '�'. 1 + �.:1 1 1 1 l 1 ,', '.'l �: �•�h 1'� 1�+ t--� t�I • - I r+ -�1�' .� .1• ..J.I �1.::���'. ��.. _r' �y ,_ +.' 1-�-T.•� _«"•r r_1� �� •,yit •�-t -~�!-1� •� +�� L ,.�--t r L_...• �•-••r-- , _ ).-i=T__'�_T � ..1.1 .tom .i.• '.- _.a.� r - �, , �'-:t -. :,_ + - I •/�- `;I' T'- .�1 .., • �"j T 1 i 1 I';' •.F r j�/ 1-1'► 1 , ' ' 1 r , • .+ ,r 1 '_ l f Y � 1 1 ,_{; 1 1 1'1 1: '-- � 1h v f, 1 • 't ! 1 ' -� -1 4,� `��l i•�il I }I�I.t�' �7f ' t •I���1!I i1 �� t 1� ' 1 Il�, t�l 1'• 'I�'.,/•1 t_t -�1:..�.._ '_ w . /� ..//11 V. I 1 1 1 •1 ., 1_'- ' ,T--_ , '' . ' 1 -,,,� , r 1 r�l 1 r 1 l r 1 r• 1 1r � I •� � • 1. . 1 1 , 1 t 'I r I 1 l,1. I 1-, t • y -' : 1-1 �, �.� _. I t� I�1 11 ' r '•r I f I t� 1 -1• ' I + .l � 1•• 1 l r r`-1 f.� ♦ t- �• 1_� , _• f �� r. r�►t� •�� . 1 - ; ,: ,;�, ) r/ , �. r;� - I l.r. �� a:-tl ;I t - -'•� ,-�- T,-,, .� I- ,� . 1 it_)' ,1`. .���.,�•--••-Y��- ..t r.._ - r• "^`j•�r r r� 1 '♦{-1' ' 1 r'F .•i "j'-1 1 1 1 rl i {I I-Fj / 1 �-� `-:.� J I -1 1 fl r , '• ., I!t,i -1 � t ,y �, (, , � ) 1 1 '- 1 r• •: t '�, T �-- ,r-I:-Y ._. 1 1 _ } �•• 1 1' , 1. .1 _^ , 1 �, '1�,�_-� ' '..ram• -j--•rr1'1�,.1 t 1 F �' - I •-• ,- * '1 1 1•J +;1 , j - _ .. . L t J r 1 ~ I 1 1 r I 1!I r.; 1-' , ,i ' r''. '' '�+! r l l,' `l l r r) I r i 4j r I •� J r��•��i'r '�'IS.I'r• I 1 1 1'r 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 '_^ -__-'_ 1�(�'1' 1 1 r +�t- I '� l ' LI '1 ••���+.fJ t.li! '•- •••IT t• '7 I -h'r-Tr•�'} '�'►�• tr 1 r .;/ f� f • 1 • 1 ' ' .1 ).i t •r 1 i- ' ,i r•• 1 1 ;•: ' , \ , ' -i 1 : t F `� 1V, .+. ...1 j 11 ri ..1 1 I) , L II r t,II,��Ir !,l }r.,��l:i 1a,1►•i'- " i : 1-r ��_«I� ►_I 1r-I��T� �'; i -•^�-`-_:_ Y7--t-7--i �+`_ Jam.. -, ..1.'-. _ -�;._r ^.T. ;1'i i r'-.}'� I. �• 1 1 1 iJ"1r'f''- 1 I r 1 1 t I r 1 i' 1 (• i 1,1 I t t , 1 • I jl � 1 ' ++ , _/•.\� , t \ 1 r 1f r' ) ( 1 1 ;r : { 1 ! )' ' 11. ,1 t1'1 'I i 1 I' ' J ,1 1 i 1''NI�1•t .\ 'r _ ) _..I -1,' I _ , __ 1 • �-1•' t 1 1 I I 1'I,�1 r}•-1' • •�'•_- r'_ _�.1 L... 'J 1_..}4.._�-. •. ,- '+' i 1♦•- r, ;i.r� ,� '-. ' r � 1, ! 1, � ' 1� 1•'/ 1 l 1 t t' !! +I "' 1 1 1 ��� ' 'r j t' r �!-- i{ ( 1•t L' ''� ' 1 ' '.� 1 r •-!'« •1 '-f �. 1 ..r __' 1 •�«_.-� .t 1 1 �T.__ �.J�•_ I ��I)ri 1 IrT.'• ' 1 , -�.. �..♦ �. �• ,- n- �J-' I�! 1 It rl I It ��r t r f l l �����1 1'' 1 ri �'l-i ! •rl (' 1 � i' •n •^�^ � � t I � � 1' 1, 1 1 1.�1 �.1 _ t_11{ ' _. � -•. � _i_ ) . �0(� 1 I , ',I ,; ,� � 1� I�1 +1 ' '.J - I•••��� T'- � 1 ;., , �. ..r„'. l- , ;,; � . : '' .1_ .ti n ' � J- r- 1...11 '•_ • -r•1 • j_ iT-r r.� .. r•- •� { ,-,ll '�'I � ( •1) i ���1 � . .,�r� 1 1:)I, I II ' �1 ! � r • 1 �1 1 � . _ .r i _I f ' 1 TL. w,r t�i L. ..�. _I_I•• l ;1 1 •I lam; �'' � !:'_'� I ..... �._-. '.:.:.... {1 � � n o � , I .171 • --- SOD -.: --� '' I__ '� _J-�.•�- --i - i .1- ' - , � . - __ ;�1t EC/ I�! .'�a_�Q• I •i/- i I _• � �; -'- '• - r-� �' _�� _�_-�_--::Rom_-� - --- , . _� � , .. rya :_ _ -:�-'-•-:-�=-�_.,:;:.��-� - • z_ 7. _. r_ ..1•..__��ir � .,...7J�.J -� _-,- =:�—__: �_YYLT� '__'_ 1 '_� 1-• j j I ,_.`r -1 - - f I _{- - I ,_ _ t- �"1 F jJVIj' •! :. t i^- �. .: — r `:"' :. t if 717 TI -777 - _ zz 77-f�- M, 71 - - Tj z_111 f Ti I-,' '_-••---+---..�' 1- {;— - t?r :� _t'♦ i_ •:.:tea`:._ 1 ►•- -+ t ..' 1�i• :T:`' _ I :-�_ �//� f —' - =L=_�.:._•1..:. : ._i: .� f--- ,. 1 :- 1 '-- ,:its- r--+�._• :i t y.,' '_ 1 -�- ;�1�• 1_. -1 !V r i - _�_ `mot 14 f �_.. .I I. . - �• - -1 "� �" =jj _ 1 '__.1_*,,;. i. 1- : _ '�--� -_l}i.T•� �T'T, . .J•�'— - j 1 -1' 1, _ i/'_ '—7!-:—�--- --�-�-.—�. fff•------- r�, -_..Jt_ J 4___�-_!1•t' ._-t ," �_.. i _. 1T ••-L� � ... .. 1 _1 -77 --. •. - J-._.� t -'.�' _.. 1 'j-1 { }•. -Jr�`-' 1- r--� :lfi:__ -_ -T.�- •r.-.,-_ 1`.. —�� -fir'-- 1-- •,•-' ---il ..-�, ', _— ,.,� • -��-1'•i•• '�T�-•- -_.fit _ :_---�)•--_--_.--- ' i _ ! •1 I j ;a l::�.��t. ? >7 I ;� i -";=�' - I .t i .".l .;i'1'. �'.-�-IT- 7 I I 7--0 T. ' I ► 1 CONWJ/T/pN$ ' furci�P� Co.v.��r�o�✓�S goo i try. ?' . oa Z.03 .401,76- OfI I �' -T I , � 1 I I I I ! I � I � n • P0,0070100 f 1 l 14/0 T',OC7-. C r /� N o�'F Fo J J I I , � I J � I I "Vol. &,: , l I o d 6 1CN�l,�c;�.��, 1(I /o�I F! ow i P� .o U.� roI �r o�iy I I Vy 16C47-10,c S 'OeA-.cVigT 17 /Dy�_ ._ y�,� _ �Sr�•��1' . _�-may Al, -1- - -- - ----- - , 9z. /2, / � Z�.� _ _Sz._�- Jam.� _ _� /2, f -- -z7. 7- ���- -./.�"7.. _ /23 D /r, 20.8' �Y9,�'_. __9..- 8� - /2s z _ 2l. 7 -7G•/_-- -�6.9_.__ /06: 7 1 1 . de Iwo 'A 0 IOLA , -.- , , , /y O 1- 9. _._ ys /-10 :-- 7 z..0,_17 ce.7 . 00,0 7 -1 71 va: /y,3- z3. 4_ - i/-6-- yam-zo--- // 8'. /y' - 3y 6-- /3, . q- ��.� �3.�.. 20.8' moo•�_ %_9 �z..�_ -��,� 23.� ���,,/. /c', .!o GS'. /3•.Z^ //40 Al o, z a, s T. - I I 1 zz 3.1 3/. /�, �!.z / •8'._ . Z' Jam, Z_ 0 2, 7 _. _G, z w /-5"r ._ /o,-41_ /Y!.o z,a, 20410 o. 9:_ z, z. 0.,\5" 3.� _ zo._o_ . 0•_�� - -�.�- a<� --- -y o I-©o r'- �� /Sr.• - 'STae/y I j I Alo Of. V D /7, -- Al A/ • /2. / 5�-� /o.9-Q- �=-S__ 19�% /��/ S�� /'Y�•9 ��2.9 �3i 3 j2. �.. `/3•� . /A - - /•/a;..5 /2,.� ../. /�O,y ee, Jp•' `/ a, ? 3 ,O 2-4 Ile .3 y-. -15j-a- -y= - 7�- �- ��. -/Fl 3 ,7 -'2 27_ . /2,.7_-- %G. __. (o• 3 _ G:�2'.. /c? � /D,z _ 2�•,to_ .�- -__ �!3.`5" ��8"_ /D.v`�__ 3�-.5� _�3__ 5'`'%_3_.. i15 Al, 7 e, -- /9,O• 7, 7 20=7- =--- --3E, 33 2 ', /�'•o �/,/ 9,�' - _� 1- i�-9 /y� -y-z• - -1�• 7_ z,s . '-fir ASI ,o ,B' or �L'2A2 .7crez-�� - - -- --- Ti1 - - - -- t• '' mo -- --Q72SLiG _ fir oPs ef3 CAS. zo , 7 off._ Po.- O �L L -4, ey-4;!n-9 -- I 10110177 07, oil fir 0 a �'S 0 QP3 ZQ 75�- -- -------- ��9 b 277, Z ��� Z♦G, ,O L'� x 381i S3— 7,3 �, 2 Q�S• �S — 17 s--- 137 - . juT�.2.� _ �ov�?.�Tio�!3 /vO�yr�._ �''y/�✓: --Si�ie!l_ TY�� � .- J J ., 3 1%017 7 �N) G ///'?•r_ -�- ---�?7--- .CAJf77 r -._. ^ _-_^0. 'sT/`��i� h►�; c�'s c FS c OPS fie. /0.9 /4 q !07• z o•y / 2y/-. i3.s. _ �y __zs: 3--- -- --`�'.8'•�. .79�-.�- - -$_$�,� - --'S'yS"_ zyy-s! j F1 :TT O gad- Cps {'S a�S �39_.,5,5y --------------- • G � - - --- -ll-_9_ // Gl • O.P 28: c-�r3•y� 57-9 -- - i�•s �7 o EVERETT O. GARDNER, P.E., L.S. E%SETT O. GARDNER & ASSOCIATES TELEPHONE 871-0808 ' EARL R. KLOTER, L.S. --"D SURVEYORS PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS KENNETH R. PETERSON 576 OLD POST ROAD WILLARD L. ROBINSON MICHAEL J. POWERS TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT 06084 October 12, 1977 STORM WATER DETENTION POND HIGHGATE ESTATES SOUTH WINDSOR - CONN. At the request of the delaloper, our office has reviewed the design and hydrology of the propc_=--- storm detention pond on the Krawski property. The design has been re v:zEd in several ways to reflect our analysis of the best approach to ts-- problem. Careful consideration has been given to the suggestions mad: : G.R. Lombardi Associates in their letter of July 11 , 1977 to Mr. J. Page. Details of the design can be found on the plans accompanying Ts report, specific items are-outlined below: A.• Dam and Pond Const%=ion I . Slope Stability a) Embankments hay°= feen revised to provide 1 on 3 slopes or flatter. . b) The outlet stru=re has been moved to allow 1 on 3 slopes on upstream face c-:' --;am and to reduce the effect of flow to this structure on t;= embankment. c) The surface of embankment is to be loamed,, seeded, and mulched. 2. Outlet Structure an: �i pi ng a) Outlet structu-- ias been redesigned as noted above. b) The pipe throu",- .he dam has been increased to a 36" I.D.. Specifications are given for ;-tts, anti-seep collars, and backfill . c) A stilling bas`,r =s provided for the pipe outlet and the emergency spillway outlet_ 3. Emergency Spillway_ a) The emergency s:'lway has been moved so that it is in original ground. b) Appropriate ri; - rap has been specified. Note that the hydrologic analysis indicZ-.---s that spillway will not be utilized unless a storm occurs which s-='ficantly exceeds the 100 yr: storm intensity, B. Hydrologic Analysi_ References: (1 ) Urban Hydroloct =1r Small Watersheds, technical release No. 55, Jan. 1975, Enyir—aring Division, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept, of Agri ci`ire. EVERETT O. GARDNER & ASSOCIATES TELEPHONE 871-0808 FI Er O. GARDNER, P.E., L.S. c;r' KLOTER, LS. LAND SURVEYORS PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS �e►-TH R. PETERSON 576 OLD POST ROAD L. ROBINSON TOLLAND, CONNECTICUT 06084 wo:-a J. POWERS (2) Introduction to Hydrology, by Warren Viessman Jr. , Terence E. Harbaugh, and John W. Knapp. 1 . Storm Hydrograph An analysis has been made of the watershed to the pond site in accordance with proceedures outlined in ref. (1 ): The watershed was divided into three subareas and the Curve Number (CN) and Time of Concentration (Tc) were developed for each subarea. Total precipitation (P) for the 10 yr. , 25 yr. , and 100 yr, return periods were determined for this area from ref. (1 ). The direct runoff (Q) was determined from the total precipitation and curve numbers for each subarea. An inflow hydrograph for each storm was developed from the appropriate tables in ref. (1 ) and the results for -the three subareas were combined using the numerical summation (tabulation) method. Tables giving appropriate subarea information and tabulation of storm hydrographs are appended to this report. 2. Hydrologic Routing of Detention Pond The design storms were routed through the proposed detention pond using the stage - storage and stage - discharge characteristics of the -pond and outlet structure as shown on the plans submitted with this report. The routing method selected is that of "numerical integration" as outlined in ref (2) , pp 181-183. The tabulation sheets for the routing are appended to this report. As can be observed from the table below and the attached plots of storm hydrograph and resulting outflow hydrograph, the proposed detention pond will significantly reduce peak flows of storm runoff at locations downstream of the pond. Peak Flow (cps) Return Period Present Future* Future Cond. Conditions Conditions Incl . Det. Pond 1 10 yr. 92,2 123.0 28.1 25 yr. 126.8 163.0 42.5 100 yr. 194.1 237.3 91 .0 * Storm Hydrograph without detention pond EXHIBIT J _ Volinne 321 _Page. No at YOM ITU CVMVSMCVT• AARRANTP DUD � �.r.w�.:.w.».'��+.�►..e...es REV.W N •••••• to nit 'People to l`�'- hem these 11resents shall (dome, (greetinS: 2779 �inafr Ve, Z4xt Zt, T7(C o 8 R MUStNG CQRPOR)ITZON, a corporation duly organized anT existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, having an office and principal place of business in the Town of Manchester, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, for the consideration of 011E DOLLAR ($1.00} removed to its jell. satisfaction Of the TOWN OP SOUTH NZNDSOR, a municipal corporation in the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, does give, grant, bargain. sell and ciowfiszn unto the said 2XWN Or SOUTH WZNDSOR, its successors and assigns forever, those certain pieces or parcels of land situated in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartfurd and State of f Connecticut and more particularly bounded and described as follows# Ott � ' FIRST PARCEL# V. A. Known as all of Rainbow Trail running from the Westerly line of Foster O -i; Street to the Northerly line of Autumn Drive, as shown on a map or plan ntitled, "Resubdivision Plan HZCHCATT' E=7TS SECTZON ZZ South Windsor, Conn. Owner i Subdivider - U. ` R1 Housing Corp. EVorett O. Gardner i Assoc. 576 Old Post Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional Engineers Land Surveyors Scale 1" - 40' Date i Oct., 1977 Sheet No..2 of ', which map or plan is on file in the Town Clerk's Office in said Town of'South Windsor. !ti B. An area designated 'Open Space" located between Lots 047 and 048, as shown on said map or plan. C. An area designated "Open Space Area - 28,080 sq. ft." located between Lots /7 and 08, and Lots 06 and 810, as.shown on said map or plan. D. An open space parcel of land designated "Area - 11,670 sq. ft." located between Lots 912 and 113, as shown on said map or plan. Together with two (2)-easements s 1. A twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located between Lots oil and 812, as shown on said map or plan. 3a. ?. A twenty (20) toot drainage easement located between Lots 05, 06 and #10, as shown on said map or plan. 5 SECOND PARCELf ;l A. Known as all of Clover Drive As shown on Sheet,No. 1 of 2 and Sheet No. 2 of 2 on a sap or plan entitled, "Resubdivision of a Portion of Parcel +� 'A' HZGHGATr ESTATES SECTION ZZZ South Windsor, Conn. Amer i Subdivider -- U. �t i R. Housing Corp. Everett O. Gardner 6 Assoc. 576 Old Post Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional engineers Zand Surveyors Scale 1' - 40' Date Jan. 1978 1 Sheet No. 1 of 2 and Sheet No. 2 of 2 of said map or plan are on file in th k Town Clerk's Office in said Town of South Windsor. ; B. All of the area designated 'for walkway" located between Lots 037 and 038 and commencing on Poster Street and, running Westerly to the Easterly line of Lots 044 and 145, at a width of twenty five and 17/100 (25.17) feet, as ? shown on Sheet No. 1 of 2. C. An area designated "Open Space Area - 24, 140 sq. ft." located between Lots 045, 048, 149 and 150, and lots 046 and 047 Sect. ZZ, as shown on She t No. 1 of 2. D. An area designated "Future Roadway' located between Lots 031 and #32 running in a generally Westerly direction to-land now or formerly of Paul G. Kuehn, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of 2. Together with two (2) easements# -1. A twenty (20) foot drainage easement located between Lots 043 and 0", as shown on Shoot No. 2 of 2. t 2. A twenty .(20) foot utility easement located between Lots 029 and 030, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of 2. _• � "No Conveyance Tax ooUected k 6fSbutft1V0K. or � e Volume 321 PAbe Na _ . .303 THIRD PARCEL: 1 _ A. Known as all of Andmar Lane as shown on a map or plan entitled, • 0 "Resubdivision of a Portion of Parcel 'A' JircHGATE ESTATES SECTION III South Windsor, Conn. Owner i Subdivider -- U. i R. Housing Corp. Everet t 6 Assoc. 576 Old Post Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional t O. Gardner Engineers Lan i Surveyors Scale 1" - 40' Date Jan. 1976 sheet No. 2 of 2- d is on file in the Town Clerk map's Office in said Tbwn of South Windsor. or plan B. An area designated "Future Roadway"'located between Lola 03I and N32_ �• running in a generally Westerly direction to land now or formerly of Paul G. Kuehn, as shown on said :alp or plan. Together with one (1) easement: . 1. A twenty (20) foot utility easement located between Lots No. 29 and 30, as shown on said map or plan. FOURTH PARCEL: A. known as all of Indian Trail as shown on Sheet No. 1 of 2 on a map or t i plan entitled, "Resubdivision of a Portion of Parcel 'A• HICIICATE ESTA TES SEC III South Windsor, Conn. Owner i Subdivider -- U. c•R. orp. TION Gardner 6 Assoc. 576 Old Everett 0 Post Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional Engineers. Land Surveyors Scale I" - 40' Date Jan. 1970 Sheet No. Sheet No. 2 of 1 of ?", and as shown on On a map or plan entitled,•"Resubdivision Plan HXG11GA7T ESTATES SECTION II South Windsor, Conn.. Owner i Subdivider - U. i R. Housing Corp. Everett O. Gardner ' Assoc. 576 Old Post Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional Engineers Land Surveyors Scale 1" - 401 Date. Oct., 1977 Sheet No. 2 of ", which maps or plans are on file in the Town Clerk's Office Town of South Windsor. to said B. All of the area designated "for walkway" located between Lots #37 and #38 and commencing on Foster Street•and running Westerly to the Easterly line of Lots #44 and #45, at a width of twenty five and 17/100 (25.17) feet, as shown on Sheet No. 1 of 2. C. An area designated "Open Space Area - 24,140 sq. ft." located between Lots #45, #48, 049 and #50, and Lots 046 and-/47 Sect. No. 1 of 2. II, as shown-on Sheet An area designated "Open Space" located between Lots I47 and'x48, as T shown.on Sheet No. 2 of E. An area designs d "Open Sp t 10 Lots N7 and #8, and Lots N6 and•110, aas shown on Sheet No. 2 of located between F. An open space parcel of land designated "Area - 11,670 aq. ft.' � located between Lots #12 and #13, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of } Together with three (3) easements: ' 1. A tweet `` `• #44, as shown on. Sheet' No. .1 ofd2ainage easement located between Lots 1►43 and 2. A twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located between Lots /11 and #12, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of 3. A twenty y (?e foot drainage easement located between Lots M5, I6 and M10, as shown on Sheet No. ? of .y "a FIFTH PARCELt .r A. Known as all of •Autumn Drive as shown on maps or plans entitled, "Resubdivision Plan HICHCATE ESTATES SECTION II South Windsor, Conn. Owner i Subdivider -- U. 6 R. Housing Corp. Everett 0. Gardner i Assoc. 576 Old Post �# Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional Engineers Land Surve Date Oct., I977 Sheet No. 2 of " does Scale 1" 40' i Parcel "A" HIGUGATE ESTATES SECTION , and "Resubth dsorsion ofn. the*Remainder of Owner ` Subdivider - U• ` R. Hoysing.Corp. Everett 0. Gardner t Assoc. 576 Old Post Road Tolland, Connecticut Professional Engineers Land Surveyors Scale I" - • { Sheet No. 1 Revisions 6 23.78" y 40 Data Mar. 1978 / / , which maps or plans are on file in the Town Clerk's Office in said Town of South Windsor. .? B. An area designated "Open Space" located between Lots •047 and 048, as p III shown on Sheet No. 2 of _. tf C. An area designated "Open Space A - " Lots N7 and N8, and Lots M6 and I10,pas shown on SheetNo. 2tof located between , D. An open spaco parcel of land designated "Area - " located botweon Lots 412 and•#13, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of,670 aq. ft. V. An open space twenty and 00 100 (20.00)�• Westerly direction from the turn-around to land designatodfeet e shown on Sheet No. 1. "T llwoorunnind orin ,", as � 2bgothor with four (4) easements: I. A twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located between Lots 011 and #12, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of i" ?. A twenty (20) foot drainage easement located between Lots 15, /6 and #10, as shown on Sheet No. 2 of ; 3. A twenty (20) foot utility easement running from the turn-ar and in 1 a North rly direction to the Southerly lin of Lots 029 as s � �= Sheet No. 2. and 430. hown'on ' .. 4. A twenty (20) foot drainage easement running in a Notthwesterly directi n over the r ar portion of Lot #I#, as shown a Sheet No. 1. i ■ M 1 Volume 321 Page No _ . .304• '9 .Q v 4 To �60r unb to �IOlb the above granted and bargained promises. with the—appurte- nances thereof, unto it, the said grantee t Its *t**. sue. cessors and assigns forever, to it and their own proper use and behoof. Anb also, it, the said grantor , does for itself, its succe s aCN=r kwx. covenant with the said grantee, its successors.kewx and assigns,that at and until the ensealin of these presents, it is well seized of the premises,as a good indefeasible estate in FEE SIMPLE;and has Rood tight to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written;and that the same is free from all incumbrances whatsoever. except as hereinbefore mentioned. ub �Iurthertnare, it, the said grantor, does by these presents bind itself and its successors ands tan xwxk r x forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to it the said grantee, its successors.A mvs and assigns.against all claims and de. =v l manes whatsoever, except as hereinbefure mentioned. THE U i R HOUSING CORPORATION by LUDIS UPENIEICS, its Vice President and duly authorized Agent, has caused this instrument to be executed in its corporate name, and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed f �riitnessheceaf, / lurars�hae+rrmstaraa thaQed .•tj xn*.xsal this 22nd ddy of August in the year of our Loy '.)?'iiEt�e�t, hundred and seventy nine. Signed. Sealed and Delivered in presence o/ TH$ 0 i R HOUSING CORPQRJITION •�, 1 serman rules Ludis Upenieks, Vice esi e!nt;..'- .jilt Doris E. Whiting 4y 31 Please execute this document in the presence of two witnesses and a Notary Public who should complete the acknowledgment-and affix his or her impression seal and the date upon which his or her commission expires. Under the signatures of the witnesses and the Notary, their names should be either printed or typed in. The Notary may serve as one of the two wit- nesses if you so desire. get �Stnte of Catttwcticut, ss. Manchester August 22, A. A 19 79 q:ountg of HARTPORD Personally Appeared LDDrs vPaNrairs, vice President and Agent of TNS•U i R HOUSING CcliPORATION, hereunto duly.authorized, who acknowledges that he execut d the same as the ties act and deed of said Corporation, TlHllt!lxxHNWx$it of the foregoing Instrument,and acknowledged the same to be his ree act a e before me. _ - Received For Record �l� August 31, 1982 at 8:36 am ------- Charles Charles N. Znes, Town Clerk Herman rules Latest address of Grantee. commissioner of the Superior Court 1540 Sullivan Avenue No.and Street ltidr of 0/%iftr City South Windsor State Connecticut vp 06074 1 f - EXHIBIT H AEINO E. HYYPPA& ASSOCIATES formerly Mepson a Hyyppe Civil Engineeers& Land Surveyors 124 Hebron Avenue Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 Kenneth B. Smith September 18, 1984 Telephone (203)633-5218 William F. Klock The La Cava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Attn: Mr. Joseph La Cava Dear Mr. La Ca va: This letter is in response to your recent inquiry regarding a connection to Foster Street. You may recall that when this firm was preparing the pre- liminary layout for the remaining Krawski land, we investigated the feasi- bility of providing a connection to Foster Street. Following are the reasons that we strongly recommended that the layout be modified to eliminate this connection. (1 ) Roadway Grade - There is presently a 50' right-of-way between two lots where this connector would have to go. The terrain in this ROW is very steep and, in order to construct a road- way with a gradient that would meet Town standards, a large amount of fill would be required. This would mean that slope rights would have to be obtained from the abutting owners and fill placed upon their lots. This would have an impact on these lots, particularly the southern one. (2) Offset Intersection - This roadway, which has to be contained within the existing right-of-way, will be slightly offset to the south of the existing Orchard Hill r)rive intersection with Foster Street. While this is not a major problem, it still creates some concern from a safety standpoint. (3) Sanitary Sewer - In constructing an east-west roadway through this area , you obviously will want lots along this roadway. The terrain is such that a sewer cannot be constructed and connected to the existing sewer in Foster Street. This means that in order to service this area, a trunk line would have to be built in a southeasterly direction along the brook to Foster Street. Construction along this corridor would be difficult, expensive, possibly have some environmental problems and would require obtaining easements across private property and/or go through Town Open Space. An Equal Opportuniry Employer t . • 1 The LaCava Construction Company -2- September 18, 1984 (4) Environmental Planning - While we can lay out a development with a roadway to Foster Street which meets the Town Open Space Requirements, we believe that from an environment planning viewpoint, it would be almost useless. The pur- pose of Open Space should be to preserve corridors along streambel is and woods which will permit the movement of wildlife and protect the environmental integrity and natu- ral flood storing capacity of streams and swamps. If you look at the layout that we proposed, you will see that we have been able not only to preserve the streambel t but we also have preserved a large meadow which will become part of the open space for the neighborhood. The Town now will have a large block of open space beginning in the Green- ridge Subdivision south of your project, northerly to the Highgate Subdivision on your north. We strongly believe this is the proper way for this to be developed, produc- ing an attractive community of homes, a desirable roadway pattern, while still preserving critical open space. (5) Traffic Pattern - While it certainly is important to have a connector between Foster Street and Felt Road, I would strongly recommend that this not be done through this de- velopment. As previously proposed, this roadway could quickly become a heavy traveled roadway for commuter traf- fic from development east of yours. This would create, in my opinion, an undesirable and possibly dangerous situation in this residential subdivision. There is no doubt in my mind that through traffic should be discouraged from enter- , ing not only this but other residential developments, but should instead be contained within the existing arterial and connector roadway systems in the Town. I hope that the above clarifies the reasoning behind the layout that we prepared for your project. If you have any further questions on this, we would be most happy to meet with you or with your engineer. Very truly yours, REINO HY PA 8 ASS CIATES KBS/cb Kenneth B. Smit�i i � O r O-Psiov� ?d&U&Ot t G V 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR•CO� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 7., 19 8 4 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Ct. 06109 Dear Sir: Re: App. #1022 - Ridgefield, Section II Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on December 4, 1984, to approve the above application for an open space resubdivision on the east side of Felt Road, opposite Deerfield Drive, known as "Ridgefield, Section II" . The plans prepared by Close, Jensen & Miller, dated July 20, 1984, Job No. 3522, must be modified as follows: 1. This approval is for 17 lots, numbered 22 through and including 38. Lots numbered 20 and 21 are not approved.- 2. Prior to submitting applications for subsequent phases, a conceptual plan must be submitted to this Commission indi- cating a road going through from Felt Road to Foster Street. 3. The applicant' s engineers must submit documentation to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer that traffic entering or exiting the proposed Ridgefield Drive will have adequate sightline in both directions on Felt Road if traffic on Felt Road is traveling at 40 m.p.h. 4. Lots 40, 41, 42 and 43 in a subsequent phase, may not be approved in - their present configuration, and consideration should be given to combining them. 5. Sidewalks, built to Town specifications, must be installed on the northerly side of Ridgefield Drive, and easterly and northerly sides of Krawski Drive to the end of Lot #13. • In addition, approximately 2, 300 ' of sidewalks must be installed at the developer' s expense at a location to be determined by this Commission at a later date. 6. Deeds for the roadways and Open Space must be submitted to this Commission prior to filing said plans. They must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney and be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds (attached) . The deeds will be held in escrow until i Mr. Joseph LaCava -2- 12/7/84 completion of the subdivision, and then referred to the Town Council for acceptance. 7. A surety bond, in an amount to be determined, must be submitted to this Commission prior to filing the final plans to ensure completion of all subdivision improvements includ- ing sidewalks and roadway improvements. In the event a Letter of Credit is submitted in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission, may, at its option, call. the Letter of Credit it is holding. 8. Street lighting shall be installed subject to the approval of the Town Manager (see attached policy) . 9. Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by the Connecticut Water Company. 10 . All lots shall be connected to the sanitary sewer system, and are subject to approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority and State Dept. of Environmental Protection. 11. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a grading plan for each lot must be submitted to and approved by the Town' s Engineering Dept. 12. If, for any reason, finished grading and other site work is not completed, the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must-be submitted prior to the issuance of a Certi- ficate of Occupancy. 13 . A drainage assessment fee in the amount of $850 shall be submitted to this Commission. 14. Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street name signs and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor and at no expense to the Town. 15. Drainage in this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 16 . A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of $1, 000 , 000 . i f Mr. Joseph LaCava -3- 12/7/84 17. No building permits will be issued until the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk' s Office. 18. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 19 . Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" = 40 ' , shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours and elevations. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours and floor elevations have been approved by the Town Engineer. 20 . Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets #1, #2 and #3, together with three paper prints, with this letter of approval reproduced thereon, must be submitted to this Commission to be stamped and signed within ninety (90) days of the date of approval (by March 4, 1984) . After signing, the plans will be filed in the Office of the Town Clerk. Yours very truly, PLANNIMP & ZONING COMMISSION i r vg By: . enc. Robert F. Gi ligan, ClYairman CC: R. Martel, Town Engineer P. DeMallie, Planning Director T. D'Auria, Building Official E. Belleville, Assessor W. Lanning, Fire Marshal Water Pollution Control Authority I ' EXHIBIT A Volume 400 Pag No - 031 (Individual) 114sF ""'a"""L'ea'GkWAGov 9 6m , [•a Ma•varo CT oawa I ' STATUTORY FORM WARRANTY DEED 00731 I, WILLIAM JOSEPH KRAWSKI a/k/a WILLIAM J. KRAWSKI, of the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut 3� Q for consideration paid, grant to THE LaCAVA OOSTRUCTION (DIPANY, a Connecticut ' corporation having its principal office and place of business at Wethersfield in said State ak with WARRANTY COVENANTS (Description and Encumbrances,If any and any additional provisions) ` A certain piece or parcel of land with the improvements thereon, situated on the easterly side of Felt Road in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut and being shown as Lot No. 2 on a map entitled "Plot Plan, ' = Property of Joseph Krawski, Jr., et al, Felt Road ;;, Foster Street, South Windsor, Conn., Scale 1" - 1001, Jan. 1S, 1976, Douglas Prior Associates, Land Surveyors," which map is on file in the South Windsor Town Clerk's office, to which reference + may be had. Said property is more particularly bounded and described as follows, to wit: NORTHERLY: By land now or formerly of Robert Joseph Krawski, one thousand ' seven hundred nine and ninety-three one-hundredths (1,709.93) feet; EASTERLY: By Lot No. 1, as shown on said one-hundredths (545.01) feet; ' five hundred forty-five and one E SOUTHERLY: By land now or formerly of U $ R Housing Corporation, one thousand i seven hundred nine and six one-hundredths (1,709.06) feet; and e ` WESTERLY: By Felt Road, five hundred fifty-five and sixty-nine one-hundredths (SSS.69) feet. Containing 21.48 acres. i Said premises are subject to any and all provisions of any ordinance, mluuicipal ff regulation or public or private law; building, building line and zoning restrictions 4#4 as of record may appear and to taxes to the Town of South Windsor on the list of .c? October 1, 1984 which taxes the grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay as part consideration for this deed. Beira the same remises conveyed to the g p eY grantor herein by quit-claim deeds from 40 Joseph Krawski, Jr., et al dated November 29, 1974 recorded in Volume 188 at 4.3 {: Page 71 and May 14, 1976 recorded in Volume 208 at Page 281, excepting therefrom a specific conveyance to the grantee herein dated August 22, 1983 and recorded in Volume 346 at Page 32 of the South Windsor Land Records. 7 cT'S, Convey Conveyance Tax received Tu.vn Clerk of Sr}ut( V�(J nds •••.•n Cierl;of South wlncfs� IYRL •ON'W Eerk day,h Tc�n Signed this Ist day of March 4�rk8S. WZ--- o;�oad-y� / `.L. .. ...................'. Johk, I 41 iam.Josep rawski a/k/a ! CO. William J. Krawski �; .. ..�...... ............. ........................................... ............................... STATE OF CONNECTICUT, !§' COUNTY OF HARTF•ORD South Windsor March 1. 19 8S Personally Appeared WILLIM JOSEPHWILLIAM J I Signer(s) of the foregoing Instrument, and KI acknKI o d the cams b his free act and deed,before me. w Grantees' Mallinp Address .. . . ... . ...... ... of 0 p 185••S A#3:Aearm.�ii•>zb�t►aft................................ •hn.. .woodCOCk,..III o:�a:cewi N • 1�..go19A.•.........•.... R3 - 3 r w E Volume 400 Page N? 032 "ATE""Po" WAMRA M DUD 00732 I, ROBERT J0SEPH IQtMWSKI, of the TOM of Farmington, County State of Connecticut won Coup of Hartford and I for consideration paid, grant• to corporation having its princi TM LaCAVA�15TRUCrIAV MANY, a Connecticut : said State Pal office WA place of business at Wethersfield in ! 9& with WARRANTY COVENANTS (Description and Eltnar&rarrpW M Mr Md anti additional provisions) r.. A certain piece or parcel of land with the improvements thereon, situated on the '° easterly side of Felt Road in the Tom of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut and be' �8 shown as Lot No. 3 on a map entitled: "Plot Plan, :• Property of Joseph Krawski, Jr., et a1, Felt Road $ Foster Street, South Windsor, A4 Conn., Scale 1" - 100', Jan. 15, 1976- Douglas Prior Associates of which map or plan is on file in the , Land Surveyors, reference is hereby had. SaidSouth Windsor Town Clerk's office, to which as follows: property is more particularly bounded and described NORTTfERLY: By land now or formerly of U $ R Hous' Co utg rporation and by land now I or formerly of Victor Zokietes, partly by each, in all, one thousand seven hundred fifteen and eighty one-hundredths (1,715.80) feet; EASTERLY: By Lot No. 1, as shotet on said ` ( feet; P, five hundred thirty-seven (537.0 ) SounmLY: By land now or formerly of William Joseph Krawski, one thousand x seven hundred nine and ninety-three one-hundredths (1,709.93) feet; ` and I ` WESTERLY: By Felt Road five ~" (555.70) feet. fifty-five and seventy one-hundredths i r Containing 21.47 acres. • Said premises are subject to any and all provisions of any mis regulation or public or private law; building ordinance, mtmicipal ' building line and zoning as of record may appear and to taxes to the Town of South Windsor on the OctoberOctober 1, 1984 which taxes the grantee herein assumes and agrees to consideration for this deed. Pay as part ; . Being the same premises conveyed to the Krawski, Jr., et al dated November 26, 1974nrecortor rdded in Vol>�med188satrom 0 3ph ' and dated May 14, 1976 recorded Volume 208 at Page 277 of the South W' ,r 0.' Records ` q e O indsor Land ; 1 ' � I��j.. V �� t Town Clerk of Town Clerk of 77 So th Windsor _i Signed this 1st SOteth 1N�.a 1prY i,� ���t. ,-:7., C_�r� f 19 85. r� i Witne d by: � �� Jo 1Vo cock, III Robert seph Krawski .,. ........:../we .......... .................................................................... i. ..... - STATE OF CONNECTICUT, I COUNTY OF �' SWM WDOSOR HART FORD MARCH 1, 19 85 ' o Personally App ared ROBW m Signer(s) of the foregoing Instrument,and acknoow ed ed the same to be w free act and deed, before me, his a Grantees' Mailing Address , t No. 185 Silas Deane Highway i coTTl.sl ;�; . Wethersfield, Connecticut•06109�••***•..•••• JO J. oodcock, III of cep JW Y� l s EXHIBIT L Volume 4U Page N? 106 ' • WARRAAITt DEW•SURMWASMP nn2 LAW w..Y.r....u • r.• prr'�Ic%y PORN/74A COPMBClXW • � nRraww rw.vr rrwY..Ye.w.ur�r...•►O.IY O O to till 11eople to 04am these Presents s4all ((tome, Greeting: �ie 11,96t 1s tt The LaCava Construction Company/ a Connecticut corporation having its principal office in the Town of Wethersfield, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut/ acting herein by George A. LaCava, Jr., its Vice-President duly authorized for the conskWw ioa of one (1) dollar and other valuable considerations F received to its full satisfaction of John J. McDermott and Sandra E. McDermott, husband and wife, of 23 Krawski Drive in the Town of j i r South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut does Bice. Brant. barBak sell and confirm unto the said John J. McDermott and Sandra E. McDermott 1 and unto the survivor of them, and unto such survivors heirs and assigns forever r 1 r A certain piece or parcel of land with the buildings thereon, situated on the easterly side of and known as No. 23 Krawski Drive in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut F and being shown as Lot No. 32 on a map entitled "Subdivision Plan Ridgefield Property of LaCava Construction Company Felt Road South Windsor, Connecticut Close Jensen & Miller Consulting Engineers, s Land Planners & Surveyors 449 Silas Deane Highway, Wethersfield, y Connecticut 06109 Scale 1" - 40' date July 20, 1984 Sheet No. S-1 of 3 revisions No. 1 date 8-10-84 Staff Comments", which map is on file in the South Windsor Town Clerk's O+:ice, to which referonce is hereby had, said property being more particularly bounded and described as follows/ to wits- - F F . Northerly by Ridgefield Drive, ninety-eight and sixty-eight 1 F one-hundredths (98.68) feet; t Easterly by land now or formerly of The LaCava Constructip ' Company, one hundred.seventy and twenty-four ?- = one-hundredths (170.24) feet= Southerly by Lot No. 33 on said map, one hundred sixty- three and fifty-two one-hundredths (163.52) feet; ' Westerly by Krawski Drive, one hundred and seventy-nine r one-hundredths (100.79) feet; and Northwesterly by a curved line connecting the easterly highway line of Krawski: Drive with the southerly highway line of Ridgefield Drive, thitty-nine and ninety- three one-hundredths (39.93) feet - Reserving unto the grantor, its successors and assigns, slope rights as shown on the above referred to map entending twenty-five (25) feet in-a southerly direction from the southerly highway line , of Ridgefield Drive. Being a portion of the premises conveyed to the grantor herein by William Joseph Krawski and Robert Joseph Krawski by two warranty deeds dated March 1, 1985 and recorded in South Windsor Land Records in volume 400, page 31 and volume 4009 page 32. t Said premises are subject to building and building line . restrictions of record, zoning regulations as established by the Town of South Windsor, utility easements as of record appear, sight line easement as shown on the above referred to map, the balance of taxes on the list of October 1, 1985 and to re-assessment and taxation on the list of October 1, 1985/ which tax s th grant s h rein assume ' and agre to pay as part c nsideration f r this d d. _ 4L g nyance Tax rocAivr/ 9 " nveyance Tax r ivQd oath ` I�i CLEW ToM►ti' lik�osu� Yr' / r volume 445 P o K t N. 107 k i ! � i to �6tw snb to cola the about granted and bargained premisswwith the appurts. nances thereof, unto them the said grantees. and unto the survivor of+m. and unto such survivor's heirs and assigns forever. to them and their own proper uaj and behoof 661nb ales, it, the said grantor does for itself, its , successors ' nd assigns,covenant with the said grantees and with the survivor of them, and with such survivor's heirs and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these r , presents it is well seized of the premises. as a good indefeasible ' t. c estate in FEE SIMPLE,and has good right to bargain and sell the name in manner and form as is above written,• and that the same is free from all incwnbrances whatsoever, r except as hereinbefore mentioned y t. urtl�etmart, it, the said grantor des by these ;presents bind itself andits successors xk!kw.and assigns forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to them the said t= ,C grantcea, and to the survivor of them and to such survivors heirs and assigns ggainat all y claims and demands whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. �. ,The LaCava Construction Company,. acting herein by George A. LaCava, 1ti �• Jr., its Vice-President duly authorized, has caused these presents f to be signed and its seal affixed this ' cJn )1itntss Vhtrtvf, r 8th day of August in the year of our L rd ;t ru n red and eighty-six. t S• ve K in The Lac Cons do an i ve in presence o/ Y 12a ..�. lurner Ge rge A. Cava,Ax., o" Vice- ident RUEeveneau �� , •r �, sca\ V V%tt of Q20nntctimt '• t CD Of HARTFORD S�Hartford, August 8th A. D. It 86 R d Personally Appeared George A. LaCava, Jr., Vice-President or ,x Q The LaCava Construction Company Signer and Sealer o the fo�eB oing Instrument. and acknowledged the same to be his Y ' free act and deed and the free act ' �rorde d of said Corporation, Latest address of Grantee: G No.and Street 'Ric_E7aR C. Tum r f' f t City Commissioner of the Superior Court 74 i State Mp l • �.�71/O�M• �r.•`�aMkl� .S. i i �rrwe�..�r��.�M������•Mr�Yf1 • M / EXHIBIT B , y r �oz�fz 074e ?dzel� o S �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 ����soR•co�'� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 April 15 , 1987 Mr . Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield , Ct 06109 Dear Joe: As we discussed on April 13 , enclosed please find a copy of the minutes of the September 10, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which lot sizes for open space subdivisions were amended . Although Ridgefield Subdivision was not specifically mentioned , it certainly appears to be included in the waiver provision for subdivisions already under construction . Therefore your next phase of Ridgefield (which , incidentally , should be designated Phase IV to be consistent with the layout presented during Phase II approval the Krawskis are actively pursuing Phase III now) can be designed under the old open space lot sizes . Sincerely , Marcia A . Banach Director of Planning MAB: dlb CC: Louise Evans , Chairman , Planning & 7oning Commission REPORT ON A THROUGH CONWCTOR BETWEEN FELT ROAD AND FOSTER STREET FOR THE RIDGEFIELD SUBDIVISION SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT For the LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MAY 20, 1987 I. INTRODUCTION The Ridgefield subdivision is a residential development between Felt Road and Foster Street in South Windsor. Formerly known as Krawski Estates, Ridgefield lies between the existing Tallwood and Highgate subdivisions to the north and the completed Greenridge subdivision to the south. The proposed Ridgefield subdivision has proposed a total of 71 to 73 single family home lots as part of an open space subdivision within the AA 3 0 residential Zone district. The subdivision has been developed in phases, with Section I and II completed to date to a total of 43 lots and related open space lands dedicated to the Town. The basic concept of the Ridgefield subdivision is for home development of the western three-quarters of the site and maintenance of open space on the eastern quarter. This open space connects to Town-owned open space to the north and south and is part of a streambelt corridor. The principal access for the development is the new street, Ridgefield Drive, intersecting with Felt Road opposite the existing Deerfield Lane. The entire subdivision would be served by the Ridgefield Drive connection to Felt Road, excepting the four early lots fronting onto Foster Street on the east and five lots fronting onto Felt Road. In effect, the concept is to serve the ' interior development by the two fingers of the cul-de-sac streets of Ridgefield and Krawski Drives, with open space remaining between the fingertips and Foster Street. Secondary access to Ridgefield is provided via a connector, Files Way, to the Greenridge Subdivision to the south and thereby i both to Felt Road and Foster Street. , II. ISSUE: THROUGH CONNECTOR BETWEEN FELT ROAD AND FOSTER STREET With the approval of the Ridgefield Section II subdivision, the Planning and Zoning Commission imposed a condition as follows: Prior to submitting applications for subsequent phases, a conceptual plan must be submitted to this Commission indicating a road going through from Felt Road to Foster Street. The conceptual plan has been prepared. However, the arguments against such a through connector are compelling. They include: o A through street serves no visible need for the residents of Ridgefield or adjoining areas. o A through street would not serve any larger pattern of arterial traffic in the Town. o A through street would duplicate access patterns available for local traffic on existing streets adjoining the Ridgefield development. o A through street would not tend to relieve significant traffic volumes from existing residential streets. A through street would seriously disrupt the open space and streambelt environmental corridor easterly of Ridgefield and extending north-south of Ridgefield parallel to Foster Street. o The extension of Ridgefield Drive to Foster Street is not practicable because of the topography and limits of the existing right-of-way approach to Foster Street. Extensive filling of wetlands, containment of roadway embankments by retaining walls, excessive grades, and impacts upon adjoining properties are major impediments to the construction of a through connector street. III. NEED FOR THROUGH STREET FOR RIDGEFIELD A. Traffic Generation and Distribution From the Subdivision The projected traffic to and from Ridgefield may be outlined using trip generation factors from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. On the average, single family homes generate 10 vehicle trips per weekday (24 hours) and one trip in the evening peak hour. Thus, for 71 homes for the entire development: daily traffic = 710 trips peak hour volume = 71 vehicles 2 n 1 LCl 140 LC ly/ exc i u a 1 ng those homes f ront i ng on Felt Road and Foster Street, the internal traffic generated by Ridgefield and Krawski Drives may be estimat d for the 62 to 65 homes of the internal area of the subdivision, i.e., those entering and exiting the development: daily traffic = 620 to 650 trips peak hour volume = 62 to 65 vehicles The distribution pattern of trips to and from the subdivision is governed by the multitude of trip purposes and destinations and by the larger roads and highway network. The vast majority of trip purposes/destinations and larger access from the Ridgefield subdivision lie in southwestern and western directions: i.e., via Route 30 (Oakland Road) to the Wapping 5-corners and from there south (Buckland Road to the Interstate system), or west via Route 30 (Ellington Road to U.S. Route 5 and I-291) , or to the northwest via Route 194 (Sullivan Avenue) . These are the directions for basic work trips, shopping and entertainment. Secondarily, Route 30 (Oakland Road) provides access to urban areas to the southeast. Finally, minor local trips only such as to elementary and middle schools and personal visits would be oriented to the northern, northeastern, and easterly directions. E. Evaluation With No Connector. The existing Ridgefield Drive at Felt Road is adequate to accommodate all vehicular travel to and from the internal homes of the full development. Ridgefield Drive at Felt Road also serves the direction of travel for most trips to and from the subdivision, i.e., westerly. From Ridgefield Drive, via Felt Road, the principal east-west arterial of Route 30 (Oakland Road) is only 2000 feet distant. For the smaller number of trips from Ridgefield desiring easterly access to Foster Street -- say, a local trip to the Orchard Hill School -- convenient access is available via Files Way to Bayberry Trail to Foster Street. A reasonable estimate is that approximately 15% of the Ridgefield-generated traffic would chose the Files Way alternative and that 85% of Ridgefield traffic would use the Ridgefield Drive/Felt Road intersection for inbound and outbound trips. In peak hour volumes, 53 to 55 cars per hour would use Ridgefield Drive and 9 or 10 cars per hour would use Files Way/Bayberry Trail for Ridgefield access. Such low volumes do not suggest the need for additional access to Ridgefield. 3 IV. UNDESIRABLE THROUGH TRAFFIC The Town of South Windsor in its subdivision regulations and its Comprehensive Plan recognizes a classification and hierarchical system for streets. That is, (1) arterials are designated for major traffic movement, (2) collectors provide secondary connection access within the Town, and (3) local and residential streets provide property access without through movement. This is a common classification system to provide necessary circulation and yet to protect, say, residential districts from unsafe, Intrusive traffic detrimental to a pleasant home setting. A connector between Felt Road and Foster Street would introduce some degree of through traffic, both through the Ridgefield residential development area and the open space reservation. Both areas would be better off without the disruption of outside traffic flows for the safety, quietness and general amenity of non-traffic zones. V. THROUGH CONNECTOR NOT PART OF LARGER CONNECTOR SYSTEM A through connector at Ridgefield Drive would make sense if there was a compelling need and a public plan to provide an east-west collector or arterial roadway of which Ridgefield Drive was a segment. Currently, Route 30 (Oakland Road) serves as the east-west arterial in southeastern South Windsor. A through-Ridgefield connector would parallel that route a short distance northerly of Route 30. A through connection of Ridgefield Drive implies continuation of a collector or arterial road system easterly on Orchard Hill Road and westerly on Deerfield Lane (extended to Ellington Road). However, such an east-west collector/arterial system has not been proposed for the area. And, in point of fact, deficiencies exist which make such an east-west collector technically difficult, including: (1) the off-set alignment at Foster Street between Orchard Hill Road and the right-of-way to the open space where Ridgefield Drive could be extended; (2) grades on Felt Road which preclude adequate sight lines for the Deerfield Lane/Felt Road/Ridgefield Drive intersection; (3) the improbability of extending Deerfield Lane through to Route 174 (Ellington Road) or Sullivan Avenue. 4 VI. CONNECTOR WOULD DUPLICATE EXISTING LOCAL THROUGH SERVICE AND EMERGENCY ACCESS A through connector in Ridgefield is unnecessary because through service exists already in the adjoining street system of the Greenridge subdivision immediately south of Ridgefield. Felt Road to Foster Street access is provided via the existing Mohegan Trail and Bayberry Trail streets. Ridgefield is connected to these streets via Files Way. One purpose of connecting residential areas to collector streets is, of course, to provide alternative emergency access routes. Although the primary access for Ridgefield is via Ridgefield Drive at Felt Road, alternative access to Ridgefield available via Felt Road/Mohegan Trail and via Foster Street/Bayberry Trail. Further emergency access appears unnecessary duplication. I. VII. CONNECTOR WOULD NOT RELIEVE EXISTING "BYPASS" TRAFFIC. A "bypass" traffic pattern exists for some east-west traffic in western South Windsor. Broadly, some drivers use the streets of Sand Hill Road, Valley View Drive and Birch Hill Drive as an east-west route between Foster Street and Sullivan Avenue. For example, a driver wishing to avoid the 5-way intersection at Wapping Center, can bypass that intersection on a trip between Route 30 at the South Windsor/Manchester Town Line and Route 194 in the northwestern section of South Windsor. Or, locally, the "bypass" is used between the South Windsor High School and Orchard Hill School on Foster Street. 5 As a measure of traffic volumes and the bypass problem, 24-hour machine traffic counts were taken on roads in the vicinity of Birch Hill Drive cn March 6 and 7, 1986: Peak Hour Volumes Location 24-Hour AM PM Felt Road (north of Scott Road) Northbound 454 39 56 o Southbound 448 37 49 Foster Street (north of Birch Hill Drive) Northbound 556 26 84 Southbound 603 101 54 Birch Hill Drive (east of Felt Drive) Eastbound 503 66 43 Westbound 394 42 42 These traffic volumes are indicative of low volume residential service roads. The volumes do not indicate a significant travel pattern. From following cars on Foster Street and those entering Birch Hill, evidence of "bypassing" through traffic on Birch Hill Drive and Valley View Drive has been stablished. But the hourly volumes are so small as to defy meaningful analysis. The question remains if a through connector at Ridgefield would relieve the "bypassing" through traffic on Birch Hill Drive. On several counts, there is no reason to believe a through Ridgefield connector would divert such traffic. For one, the roadway and intersection on Foster Street and Birch Hill Drive offer more favorable grades and intersecticns than the alternative of a through-Ridgefield/Felt Road route. The distances of the two alternate rout s are the same between, say, Route 30 at Foster Street and Sand Hill Road. But for many destinations using the Birch Hill "bypass" -- say, to Orchard Hill and Timothy Edwards Schools -- the location of Birch Hill Drive is obviously in line with Sand Hill Road/Valley View Drive, whereas a Ridg field Drive connector would not offer a resonable "bypass" route. 6 VI II. DISRUPTION TO OPEN SPACE AND STREAMBELT CORRIDOR The through connector would intercept the Town-acquired open space lands and streambelt corridor parallel to Foster Street. Environmental preservation of wetlands and the pond area would be severely disrupted# and the large tract of contiguous open space would be bisected to the disadvantage of the community. The roadway will reduce the storm water retention capacity of the existing retention facility. IX. IMPRACTICABLE ROUTE FOR CONNECTOR CONSTRUCTION A concept plan by Close, Jensen and Miller has been prepared to show the extension of Ridgefield Drive easterly to the right of way at Foster Street opposite Orchard Hill Drive ("Concept Plan" dated April 20, 1987). In addition, the roadway profile, sample cross sections, and a plan for the roadway at Foster Street have been prepared to illustrate the construction of the Ridgefield Drive extension as a 30 foot wide Town street meeting Town standards. In length, the extension of Ridgefield Drive adds 1140 feet of roadway, with approximately 700 feet of this across the Town open space land. The road must necessarily cross the northern section of the Town pond/wetland area and would require 6-1/2 feet depth of fill for the roadway embankment through the wetland zone. The natural topography west of Foster Street is a steep slope. In order to maintain an 8% minimum grade, the roadway approach to Foster Street would again require fill and elevated embankments (to over 7-1/2 feet depth). The existing right-of-way between the properties at 221 and 241 Foster Street (opposite Orchard Hill Drive) is 50 feet wide, thereby necessitating retaining walls to support the roadway embankment within the right-of-way. The retaining walls at the property lines would be located about 50 feet from the adjoining homes. Views from the elevated roadway will be directed downward into the adjoining properties, while views from the properties will be dominated by the expanse of the retaining walls. Access to the adjoining properties would, of course, be impossible. 7 r The construction of a Ridgefield Drive extension through to Foster Street entails prohibitory problems and expense. The construction through the 50-foot access right-of-way off of Foster Street is a major obstacle: erection of over 400 feet of retaining walls (with bridge-type railings) to contain the roadway embankment; large quantities of fill placement; and the legal issues of construction easements from adjoining owners (with the need for on-going maintenance easements for the Town) . The resulting roadway, if constructed, would impose limitations and hazards welcome to no one: the intersection at Foster Street will be off-set from the alignment of the opposing Orchard Hill Drive; the roadway grade west of Foster Street will be unusually steep and hazardous, and the crest of the vertical alignment will impose restrictions to the stopping sight distance for an eastbound motorist; the elevated roadway will have the appearance of a causeway -- uninviting to a motorist, out of character for the area, and detrimental to surrounding properties. In brief, the extension of Ridgefield Drive to Foster Street would entail a great length of roadway serving no adjoining properties, and the conditions of the natural topography and the existing access right-of-way impose severe construction problems and expense to the degree that the roadway is impracticable. John H. Miller, President Close, Jensen and Miller, PC 8 241 Foster Street South Windsor, CT 06074 July 21, 1987 Ms. Louise C. Evans, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Dear Ms. Evans: Unfortunately, my wife and I will not be available to attend the next meeting of your commission where discussion will continue concern- ing the Ridgefield Development connector. Through this letter and by my signature below, please be advised that we are opposed to the project. Our property abutts the proposed road, and we would consider the construction of same a hardship. Very truly yours, Sebastian Caramma SC/pps . OI ill 1987 Sotuth Windsor �� Planning & Zoning cmNjujoa an Miller, P C ose, Jensen CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, LAND PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS WETHERSFIELD, CONNECTICUT 061094201 3 `�VinciSOr. & Zoning CommisSS199 DRAINAGE COMPUTATIONS Ridgefield Subdivision Section VI 10 Year Storm Rational Formula Felt Road - South Windsor November 198? Ridgefield - South Windsor Storm Drainage Design rY' All storm water fran Ridgefield DriVO- east of Station 6+94 will be dischargg+ed to the existing detention pond east of Ridgefield Drive. The attached calculations for the design of the paYi by Everett O. Gardner & Associates, dated October 12, 1977 indicate that there is sufficient capacity for the additional discharge of 9.9± CFS from this project. At that time peak flows were reduced from 194.1 CFS prior to development to 91.0 CFS after development. The additional flow from this development of 9.9 CFS is well within the existing capacity limits of the pond. The peak flow from the proposed subdivision will also proceed the existing peak by approximately 12 hours further reducing its inpact on the pond. Ec_itIM Storm Sewer Q=c_IJy Storm water from section 4 of this proposed subdivision will a to the existing storm drain system at (1) the intersection of Ridgefield and &zwski Drive (1.32 CPS) and (2) at the intersection of Su merwind and Krawski Drive (2.77 CFS) . The existing system flows east in Krawski Drive and di irges to the brook at the rear of lots mmftr 21 and 12. 'The above 4.09 CFS of additional flows to the Krawski Drive storm drain system is off-set by the deletion of 4.08 CFS (4.84 AC x .25 x 3.4) of runoff which is by the Ridgefield Road drainage system. Mere is therefore, essentially no change in the existing amount of flow in existing Krawski Drive drainage system. Stort Sewer System Design \ u 4164 • ed ~ �.+ ii 1+4 o �a b q d u q va p yy _ 9 is p4 of < 2 A (N 5 6 7 8° 9 14 11 12 13 14 15 lb- � d r �Z• -� S ,d6° IS' .i s- o.rs ¢. 3 �/ 3 S o L 3 +p //D u 'i o 17,1.44 .�4 4-o I. 8 �� �v .e ! 4•S 7,6 !Z 3.4 Z S ..os-4 /l'a /7 0 s 1.s& Z c"o$D`s g �.S s $ 3 7 /; /S O.S d•So �.d Z, o 7,0 n a Z_ a +o -�► /G . / /L. Z �"3ii OZ.3 Z ,9 • O " 3 S . o Z 9.z 9.L ,i a 9 -�►/O0.70 0.70 �.v Z•$ �� Zo' ,Q ! S.Z. '�D o.i 40 O,R G 4-,o 3.Z 103 /7. 0 �� p "1 osr& a l ¢ 4.D 3, �S ,oo� �,S 9�.9 •� 0-3 M a A w. r • /ff4 _• J II f I i I I f r I I s.. Y 1' I .0 1"1 .I 13 1i I t.,I ,;"• r f _ ', I R , I .i f t I � t� � 'I , � , I -' f-. f , :��,-, f r ' r � - r a f f t 'i 1 ,• I I t i � �, i:: , f r. ', i ' ' ' �•. � i '! 1,, 1 � ' I ' { t.1 f� i � 1 r �I i 1 I. � `I' ' t I I '' ', '! � ,'i t I' � I .�•• '1 I ,' i'• I f I r I I i � , 9. 9 a cfs ' t rt r , I � Rat I I,,Ir�, •�1R I / �I�I.� I i �I ,r..� (.Su�iyrst�w�sq 'i Zr'77 TOr STA. OFFSET �D STA. :0 • OFFSET M STRUCTURE TYPE o c G - G/3 � � Y 02 SZ, a TOP OF ORATE ELEV. ZGo- o l— u OUTLET •TA. M. OES10tl W.S. ELEV, a S�• $7 .__ OUTLET TW. EL. OUTLET EL 2'00"7L /o i5 _ q 9.q IFS EL X4-7.1z AEL`2 4-7 1 q• 9.9 L fS EL EL. �1 �zo ' 7 � LENOT11 LENGTH 3S b SLOPE o-o 7- SLOPE Z- 111LET ' lilt ET v SIZE OUTLET CONTROL IIW• 11 t Ao-L90 e! SIZE _Cf�111111)1. OUTLET COIITROL IIW� 11 i be -LSo e� � ns CON1hOL _ TYPE A 11W IIW KQ N d� -£� TW ho LS IIW TYPO n 11�1. IIW Ke 11 d a TW he L9 IN u —+ M ,o/Z 2,6 3,ZS S� 3,6 1,2S /,Z S I.a Z.4 Z,6S �,ZS rri� 3,2,E t.6, 1.ZS , s 8.1- - &.25 3.ZS 7/4 A 31 4,51 `X � C -0 It? -r l c r STA. STA. OFFSET c) ` OFFSET < < G^ c Q 8TRt1CTI1AE TYPE < 240 3, 7 TOP Of ORATE ELEV. a`�4.3 �- > O .!_ G . 7 7 OE61011 W.S. ELEV. - �'7 /•7 Z .!_ 2 b .� c!. 0757, �1. S9,G¢ q• E 7A.4 Y LE110T11 1/D LE110T11 a/ s � SLOPE ' 04 SLOPE 50 111LET II1l.ET SIZE COuTAOL OUTLET CONTROL IIW 11♦ho-LSo SIZE _COtll1T OUTLET CONTROL IIW• If be -LSO e� x TYPE A IIw IIW K� li ao �� TW Ito LS IIW � TYPE n IIjW-- IIW KC 11 do - Q• TW ho LS IIW opt �•� �,l3 Z.«p - 4.31 �.31 SZS /.03 Z,/3 —— --— 2— s STA. OFFSET m S TA. :o • " Y m OFFSET 1,-• G L/3 STRUCTURE TYPE ' 4. Z 74 3 TOP OF ORATE ELEV. Z 12• �— u OUTLET STA. .Y. 27/' 7.Z OE510f1 W3. ELEV, o27 8.S`� ^__ � O1c '.[ k7l OUTLET T.W. EL. OUTLET EL � _ .1 �1 4• E1. El. Z74.zy q• ,L S c�S 9L 27 2 EI,. 277 Z 9 LENOTII LENOTII - b SLOPE 61_OPE IIJLET illl ET h SIZE OUTLET COIJTROL IIW• It i No-L3o a 512E O(JTI.ET COIJTAOL IIW• If i ho -LSo COf/l'h_OL_ _CbfJl llUl. 3: TYPE IIW IIW Ke H de - TW ho L3 IIW TYPE n ll t .IIW K� 11 dc a6 TW Ao 1-3 IN .A n- . ,iiZ S 7 — L 1,44 7ow S TA. STA. OFFSET (� OFFSET �yPC G G3 STRUCTURE TYPE012L G G Z TOP OF ORATE ELEV. O l— 2. Z�3, '�$ 0E610IJ W3. ELEV. Z-�3. G � .!_ 4 1 d efS E1. Z0I,7 29rL.r7' q. /•3Z, �-FS EL. -2-OZ.S E� o � E1.• Y LEIIOTII Z 3 s LEIJOTII Z d •. SLOPE ' b L3 SLOPE 'O IIJL ET IIJI.ET 31tE C014TI10l. OUTLET COfJTROL IIW• 11 t ho-L90 •i JIVE CON1 ItM, nllTl.ET COIJTAOL IIW• II t ho -L'o TYPE w IIW HW Ke It de TW NO L3 IIW TYPE A IISW IIW KC 11 do TW ho 1.3 IIW Az •o/Z �Z 8 e.�8 ,trio •.r o,S ,1�3 .l t 6. 8 98 •L .7S ,78 3 i�� 6TA. OFFSET o V STA. fn :0 0 . OFFSET e_ STRUCTURE TYPE - G i3 a a- . x � TOP OF ORATE ELEV. z s' �- u 4 _a,•. Z •2 7 g• G9 .=3_ ��• i mOUTLET dTA. . _ 7 g'sOESIOfI W9. ELEV, OUTLET T.W. EL. OUTLET EL � - Z agEL EL 2- LENOTII I.ENIOT11 7-0 6LOPE 61.OPE 0•a / u r INLET _ �Illl E T _ `� SIZE OUTLETCONTROL IIW• 11 t LSO SIZE OUTLET COIJTROL IIW• 11 i h L9 T n1 CONThOL o o e C0141�IIU1. o o E ] TYPE o IIw IIW Ke 11 dc - TW ho LS IIW TYPE n ll .IIW K,. If do _E� YW ha LS JIW .74 .S -It - - 1.3 1.3 C cr :n STA. STA. OFFSET C� Off AET L STRUCTURE TYPE G - G i3 n U TOP OF ORATE ELEV. ;' ._. Z G I,-7 7 OE6ION W.S. ELEV. Z �,7 7 Z s o• E!, Et..Ls9 s 4 4. zS`.7¢ EI. LEIIOTII LEfJOTII Zru •. SLOPE 61.OPE ' INLET• SIZE IIJLET COIITIIOL OUTLET COIJTROI. IIW• 11 t ho-L90 k SIZE CONI IIM. OIITI.ET COIJTROL IIW• 11 t Ao -LOo Ck IIVf �c - Y TYPEE IIW K41 If do - � TW ,.h°. 1.S IIW TYPE ` IjW- -IIW KC II do -t�,�Q TW It L3 IIW �.J9 1 'f �lP Z �� •// i J w/+ 4//3 ZI13 z.. 463 Z•c3 �� V Y STA. OFFSET x STA. � :a n 0 OFFSET STRUCTURE TYPE x m Z3`i. 8 TOP OF ORATE ELEV. Z 4 4 u �38.7 OUTLET STA. Y_ DESIGN W.S. ELEV, z 3$' 47 OUTLET TW EL. (� C� 5 t, # l3 >> Fi \`1 OUTLET EL 4 EL EL 3 . 2- q. z,77 IFS �� Z 3�S3 \EL 2-27,S 3ti LE140TII I.EIIOT11 G S D SLOPE 6l OPE •O S u V IIILET ' lilt ET SIZE GOtl1'AOL OUTLET C014TROL IIW s II i ho-LBO a SIZE COW llt)t_ OUTLET CONTROL IIW� Ili ho -LBO e� _ _ _ TYPE A tIW IIW Kg 11 d� -ELQ TW ho LS IIW TYPL n ll�i- IIW K� If do d tQ TW ho L3 IN Fri h .75, a•g4 ,S o,30 - - /s 171 3 S TA. STA. OFFSET c) fi OFFSET 9TRlICTIIRE TYPE r] u Z53,¢ TOP OF ORATE ELEV. Z.S 3.4- l— a s_ 07,48•3I DESION W.S. ELEV. z4=• 41 7/ LLS El.. Z S0. o q. �- EL z So.z. EL- � o LEIIOTII g3 LENGTH -2 SLOPE '0 S 61.OPE ' IIILET INLET SIZE C014TI10t_ OUTLET CONTROL' IIW 11 t ho-1.90 SIZE (1tiTl_ET COIITROL IIW 11•t ho -LBO C _ _ COi1111 M. r TYPE Ilt►l IIW Kd It do -�� TW ho 1.3 IIW TYPE n I�r •IIW Ke If do -L TW ho LS IIW 5 .o�Z .7t 0.1 . $' p,;p •'y ,9S .94' ,9S �:8b _' q ;rep 74 ,J t .G •S .9 .5 . Z. . 8 8 I ALTER AND PURTILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 155 SYCAMORE STREET PETER JAY ALTER P O.BOX 935 SHARON HOLLAND PURTILL GLASTONBURY,CONNECTICUT 06033 TELEPHONE 659-0569 JOHN S.ROSANIA• AREA CODE 203 REGINA WEXLER LEFEVRE •ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK January 18, 1988 Ms. Marcia Banach Director of Community Development Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Reference: Ridgefield IV LaCava Construction Company D ar Ms. Banach: With regard to the above-referenced subdivision, enclosed please find two checks as follows: 1. a check in the amount of $625,00 which represents the Open Space Subdivision filing fee; and 2. a check in the amount of $100.00 which represents the Wetlands Application fee. Yours very truly, eter J Alter cv / Enclosures cc: Joseph LaCava D J� ends°r �1a ' STORM SEWER ANALYSIS SSA----VERSION JAN. 1988 CLOSE, JENSEN AND MILLER WETHERSFIELDv CT RIDGEFIELD IV ' 2/12/88 . - _ 100 YEAR STORM (D. O.T. CURVES--HARTF8RD) -� FROM TO DRAINAGE AREA TIME RAIN DIGCH PIPE PIPE PIPE MANN MEAN FLOW PIPE ---------------------- ---------- FALL Q LEy4G SLOPE DIA. -ING VEL. FULL FLOW C.B. C. B. DELTA C DELTA SUM DELTA SUM RATE -TH N CAPY TIME A CA CA TlME [IME ACRES ACRES ACRES MiN. MIN. IN/HR CFS FT FT/FT IN. FPS CFS 11111N. ---- ------ ---�^ 1 2 1" 90 . 40 0. 76 0. 76 1 15. 0 b" 7 4. 3 20 "0100 15"0 . 012 6.0 2 4 0. 15 . 80 0. 12 0. 88 5. 0 15. 1 5. 7 5. 0 235 "0230 15.0 . 012 8. 5 10. 6 3 4 1 . 10 . 40 0. 44 0. 44 15. 0 15.0 5. 7 2.5 20 .0100 15.0 .012 5"2 7. 0 o. 1 4 5 0. 13 . 80 0. 10 1. 42 15. 5 15.5 5"6 8.0 125 "0560 15°0 " 012 13. 4 16.6 0.2 5 7 0.08 . 80 0.06 1 . 49 15. 6 15.7 5.6 8. 3 215 .0500 15.0 .012 12"9 15.6 0. 3 6 7 1 .00 . 50 0. 50 0. 50 15. 0 15. 0 5"7 2"9 20 . 0100 15"0 . 012 5. 4 7. 0 0. 1 7 8 . 0. 15 . 80 0. 12 2. 11 15. 8 16.0 5"5 11.7 110 "0460 15.0 . 012 13. 7 15,3 0. 1 8 MH O.36 . 60 0. 22 2. 32 16. 0 16. 1 5.535� .0�00 15.0 .012 ##.# rg'�� 0.0 =.B � 9 10 1. 40 . 50 0. 70 0.70 15. 0 15. 0 5.7 4.0 20 "0100 15.q.4 . 012 5.9 7.0 0. 1 10 11 0.26 . 80 0. 21 0. 91 15. 0 15. 1 5. 7 012 11" 7 16.3 0.3 11 13 0. 13 . 60 0.08 0. 99 15. 0 15.3 5"6 ##. # ( 4.�� 0.0 EX 3A EXIST X 0. 78 ° 40 0. 31 0. 31 15. 0 15. A 5. 7 1.8 100 .0100 15.0 . Al2 4. 8 7.0 0.4 ' . EX 4A EXIST Y 0. 18 .80 0. 14 0. 14 5. 0 5. 0 8.6 1.2 100 .0100 15" . 012 4. 3 7.0 0. 4 of, . � //= ) 0� ' / GUTTER FLOW ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAM CLOSE, JENSEN AND MILLER. WETHERSFIELD, CT. VERS° 11/01/83 RIDGEFIELD ROAD RIDGEFIELD ' FILE l SOUTH WlNDSOR ' JANUARY 1988 INLET TYPE STATION TIME AREA COEF Al SUM TOT RAIN Q TO GUT CROSS FLOW FLOW Q Al Al Q Al Al RATE INL GRADE SLOPE DPTN WDTH BYP BNYP ENT ENT MIN ACRE DIML ACR ACRE ACRE %N/H CFS DlML QIML FT FT CF8 ACRE ACRE CFS 3A C 0003+50L- 15.0 0. 78 . 40 0. 31 0.31 0. 31 5. 7 1 . 78 . 0140 " 0312 0. 19 6"2 0.80 0. 14 0. 17 0. 98 (BYP. FEEDS OFF PROJ. ) ' 4A C 0003+50R- 5.0 0. 18 .80 0. 14 0. 14 0. 14 8. 6 1 . 24 .0140 .0312 0" 17 5.4 0.49 0.06 0.09 0. 7tj (BYP" FEEDS OFF PROJ. ) . pu 1 C 0009+50L- 15. 0 1 . 87 . 40 0. 75 0.75 0. 75 5"7 4. 26 .0100 . 0312* 0" 29 9"2 2.56 0. 45 0.�0 1 . 71 (BYP. FEEDS 3 ) . 2 C 0009+50R- 5. 0 0. 15 . 80 0. 12 0. 12 0. 12 8. 6 1 "03 .0100 . 0312 0. 17 5.4 0.40 0.05 0. 07 0. 63 (BYP. FEEDS 4 ) 3 C 0011+80L- 15.0 1 . 10 .40 0. 44 0.44 0. 89 5. 7 5.07 .0400 .0312 0. 24 7.6 2.68 0.47 0. 42 2. 38 (BYP. FEEDS 6 ) . 4 C ' Q11+B5R- 5. 0 0. 13 .80 A. 10 0. 10 0. 15 8. 6 1 .3-A "0400 " 0312 0. 14 4.5 0"41 0. 05 o. 1A 0.89 (BYP. FEEDS 5 ) 5 C 0013+20R- 5.0 0. 08 .80 0.06 0.06 0. 11 8. 6 0. 96 . 05A0 . 0312 A. 12 3.� 0.23 0. 08 (BYP. FEEDS 7 ) 6 C 0015+30L- 15. 0 1 . 00 .50 0.50 0.50 0. 97 5. 7 5.53 .05A0 .0312 0" 23) 7°!5 2.91 0. 51 0. 46 2.62 (BYP. FEEDS 8 ) ~ 7 C 0015+30L- 5. 0 0. 15 .80 0. 12 0. 12 0. 15 8. 6 1 .26 . 0500 . 0312 0" 13 4.3 0.37 0.04 0. 1A 0.90 (BYP. FEEDS 8 ) _ 8 C 0016+40C- 15.0 0. 36 .60 0.22 0"22 A. 77 5°7 4.39 "0000 . 0312 0" 40 12°a 0.00 0.00 0. 77 4" 39 ' (SUMP_ NO CLOG) --- /��^ � 7' `' . RID8EFIELD FILE "RDGFGFA" PAGE2 ' SOUTH V4INDSOR 100 YR. STORM JANUARY 1986 INLET TYPE STATION TIME AREA COEF AI SUM TOT RAIN , Q TO GUT CROSS FLOW FLOW Q AI AI Q AI AI RATE %NL GRADE SLOPE DPTH WDTH BYP BYP ENT ENT MIN ACRE DIML ACR ACRE ACRE IN/H CFS DIML DIML FT FT CFS ACRE ACRE CFS 9 C 0004+40R- 15.0 1.40 . 50 0. 70 0. 70 0 70 5 7 �� �y�� 0837 0�%2 ��--- --~-- ----- ---- ---- ----- (BYP. FEEDS OFF PROJ, ) ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ " l�� ��"0 1 ^ 75 0. 31 0. 39 2,24 10(BypC FEEDS 0004+40L- 15. 0 0.26 .80 0. 21 0. 21 V. 21 5. 7 1. 1� "0837 . �)�12 ��. 1�� �"8 0.28 0. 05 0. 16 0.91 11 (Byp FEEDS 0 3 C 0006+25L- 15.0 . 13 . 6o 0. 08 0. 08 �. 1 5.7 0. 72 .A30A . W3 ���2 " 12 �� 8 0 17 0 03 0 10 0 55 . �u� OFF PROJ. ) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , . . STA. 6TA. OFFSET u V • OFFSET '0 STRUCTURE TYPE G ' G f1 40 e2.SZ, a TOP OF ORATE ELEV. LG0. u OUTLET ATA. 3•15 G r s �. o, ai d OV�IVD 'n./OoyR LLB OES13.115 GFSLEV. oZ S9•s7ho) -__ I < $ �1 Z'¢S97 oVEfLAAID�,,�aOY.C. z.GD.g0*00) tf I d OUTLET TW. EL._...__._.. (AMrrFA� � ,Z 40,'7Z OUTLET EL. � � EL ,z47.�z EL� Z47./ q� �oo� 9.q',e Ll, F.S ��, 4�' EL S�•zA •� LENOTII 4100)LENOTII- 3 S 7 SLOPE o•o z- SLOPE •o Z_ b u SIZE [1f, O 11IJL hO1 OUTLET COIITROL IIW 11 f be-LSo e bIZE -'Illl ET OUTLET COIITROL It Ili h - -L, •, C014111m. o LSo r r TYP1: wIIW Ice N Of -i TW ho LS IIW TYP[ 11w Ke H a 7W ho LS I1W.o/t6 3,2 S .S� 3,t - !.2 S /,Z s �.zS Z. Zz5 32S -- - _ 3,2,E Z �.Z S . S 8.t - 3.25 3,Zs 714 A 3J 4 `p N \ 01X �.8 G.00 .5 - _7 � ., 17 6.83 G,J3'3 7.i4 14.ZI 3 �,D 5,0 s (,,33 - l,�.s �1.� I,�s �. (� �n 4� 3 4• - - - •3 5.2 5.2. 7, 3 0 3.-75 .5 �,6 - l,as 1.25 /,�s �,� 3,35 3,75 3,ao 3 7�r �� _ _ - - � .0 � d 9. 5 3.77 13,77 7,1 N' G.►2 4.13 n i 15= - •�►�nN "'ta-C,is. STD. Off3ET n 11 c=�0.5�• io.�c�=S--4�. OFFSET T/p-e G L Q 3TRUCTIJRE TYPE G - �r� u I` • � TOP OF ORATE ELEV, a,74,3 lK- 1 b OES1014 W.S. ELEV. - Z7 �•7 ZGo� Z EL y Y.Z LEIJ0TII //D • LEIIOTII az/ s rl , �► SLOPE o4g SLOPE • C -s SIZE INLET OUTLET CONTROL IIW• 11♦1► INLET' C011TF10L o-L 5o SIZE C 11L ET` OUTLET Co11TAOL' IIW• lithe -LSo C k IIW N TYPE A NW K� 11 d� -Ate TW t►o 11 IIW TYPE .� -I W KC 11 de - Q TW he LS IIW 4.31 4,31 SZS /,03 L,/3 ,Q.z ,is 1;4¢ ,SS 1. ¢ --- ----- - - - - - - �� � �� `� .i r ,.��� ��� V.� V._ ./,I•I 4,64 ��`I.I �,i •�I 1.5 II IY /$ �• -1i �9 tit 10.15 �.�.� STA. STA. OFFSET o A OFFSET i3 STRUCTURE TYPE x 1. Z 7 3 TOP OF ORATE ELEV. Z�' /— u OUTLET STA. .Y. 27/• 7 Zwo) OESloll W 3. ELEV. 27 g•S`j6e) OUTLET T.W. EL. sr P-7a• l7Cco) �7fl,97(a#) S ¢ 5 o OUTLET EL �. SSG/6,00 4• EL EL Z70•Zy q• _ 4 .Z-S AS 9L Z7 7 Z EL�277 LE140TIO LENOTII_ / Z 1� d SLOPE SLOPE •OS� u v INLET o-LS ' SIZE '11I1 ET OUTLET COIITROL IIW• if A -LS ni SItE CON1'hOL OUTLETCOIITAOL IIW• 11 i� to e� Cl,I11'Itul. o o e� TYPE o IIW IIW Ke N do -E� TW Ito L3 llw TYPO n -ll�l. •IIW Ke 11 da -Sly TW Ito LS IIW --- —L fTl N ►' 1.3 I.(S .5 1.3 -- — /•SIB I.SB 7.0 "T1 ^ o 1 in STA. STA. OFFSET�- () Of •ET STAUCTUAE TYPE G/3 T l-- TOP of onATE ELEV. t pEeloN W3. ELEV. - L�3• G �o� .� sZ o2 83,S7000� o._a.3eT_Ir� �! 2$t,7 Et Z�Z o _ %•3i��cFs zbz,g �. E \EL (/) S LEIIOTII Z 3 s LENOTII- Z O •. SLOPE • b L3 SLOPE • IIILET -' SIZE OUTLET CONTROL llw It t �-LS SIZE INI.ET DURET CONTROL IIW• 11♦A LS COuT1101 co��t11M o - o ek TYPE IIW HW K4 It do -S2 Tw Ito L] 11w TYPE o -�jrw- .IIw KC 11 do - Q TW Ao LS IIW 6 x ar •�/t J 3 13 S, �4.�8 ,c�� •wZ o,So ,G3 ./t . s .g8 6.�g ,yg ,L .�8 .'70 3 17 .8� •3� = 1,�8 I.GS 9.4 ` .81 .7f •5 .a 6 •5 ,SS .89 .91 .� .7,5 .75 STA. 6TA. OFFSET f�O In 70 OFFSET /L G STRUCTOIRE TYPE ii o TOP OF ORATE ELEV. - Z D u OUTLET STA. ?. Z7 g,S�►6o)DESION W.S. ELEV. _ A-7$.G9(o) : 2 OUTLET TW. El.OUTLET EL 7 Fi 4 EL EL Z 77. 4 s ._._1�8 Gf5 EL Z'7 7 41 EL• 2 �1 LENOTII l.EN4T11 Z U SLOPE 610PE u N 1111 ET v SIZE COIJI°hOL OUTLET °COIITAOL 11W• 11 f Ao-LSO e SIZE _CG 111iu_1. OUTLET COIITAOL IIW• Ifi ho -L90 n1 1c TYPE o iivV IIW K8 H dc -£La TW ho LS low TYK n 11 .IIW. K� 11 dQ aA TW ho L9 IIW 8% —+ fTi ..S" .It .Z 70 N •71 .87 .S .11 — - 1.48 I.GB .a. I.�9 1.57 c STA. STA, OFFSET OFFSET L /3 3TRUCTIIAE TYPE 0 n G e—�3 r'rjal u L,3'7 TOP OF ORATE ELEV. _. Z 4.l,7 7W OE61011 W.S. ELEV. Z&/,7 7oy .__ Z 7 �G3, 43G.o> �(,3, 97(1so) tj 4' �1. EL LS= 48 /' 9�.41 As� S EL LS`.7¢ Et� o LENGTH LEIIOTII ^) •. SLOPE SLOPE IULET IN1°ET MITLET CONTnOI, low• 11+� Ls SIZE COJLET OUTLET CONTROL IIW• 11 t ho-LOS SIZE _COfll lll' o " o Ck r r TYK h low "W, Ka If do TW ho LS 11W TYPE p IW low KC If do - Q TW he LS IIW fi N •s' .aZ 4 3 s •/t ETA. OFFSET ~°STA. • � ;o n 0 OFFSET STRUCTURE TYPE _ z r, Z 31, 8 TOP OF ORATE ELEV. _?-A* 4 u -1 g39.* OUTLET BTA. Y Z38'7 DESIOtl W.9. ELEV. ovo OUTLET T.W. EL.� 13 OUTLET EL �.. �EL 3,7'OC,s,� — ! 4• EL _Z 3 7• 2- 4• z.77 r�S 9L Z S-1.S3 \EL. ZZ-',5' LENOTII 1 ENOT11 G`S D ELOPE 61 o_PE '°o•S , 3 N r INLET ' lilt ET _ i c SIZE OUTLE COIITROL IIW• Ili A L9 SIZE OUTLET CONTROL IIW• Ili A L9 � C_ON1'hOI__ — e C0111 hol. P �> IIW _ _cLQ llVl. dfc1Q F!:� TYPE ItW KQ II d� Tw noLS IIW TYI'l: n IIW Ke It do � Tw 1% IIW fTl ti R .. .7q 1.5 1. 5 ,3 1 G�- 1•d�- C r ^ 3 STA. STA. OFFSET C) r rl OFFSET 9TRlICTtfRE TYPE U Z53.4- TOP OF ORATE ELEV. ZS 3.4- ''\\ D2413.3Igo) DE81011 W.S. ELEV. �S�i O(•� ,__ Z V s /o301 4= y —b l;l.. O. o I,'7/�o�CLS EL LEIIOTiI LENOTII -2 D r _ 17 SLOPE '0 SQ' ELOPE ' IfiLET INLET* ONTROL SIZE C OUTLET CONTROL IIW• lit no —1. conk ri M.SIZE OUTLET C014TROL, IIW• Ili ho -LSD � _ ,. _ �x � TYPE Ilw tiw. Kd It do TW 1►0 1.3 IIW TYPE n I r -11W I(e It do - TW 1% LS IIW 5 Ate .oi7. .71. o-9 • S' �.;p .'y .9S .9S fog —' ,g 44/7,oiL •59 •7¢ .� / � (, 5 � S 8 1 -T5-_ ► 1 + •85 I.oG •S .S8 -75 ).0 104X I.42- q.$8 :L- .65 ,?a- I r o,RM sf,`� � r T_0�� C aye Saam ?dbu&-at O � a � s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•CO� AREA CODE 203 644.2511 February 23, 1988 LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT. 06109 Gentlemen : RE: Application #533 At the February 22 , 1988 meeting the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved with conditions Application #533. Storm water drainage will be discharged into existing pond situated in Town—owned Open Space easterly of the proposed subdivision . Construction activity will involve installation of necessary drainage facilities; drainage will be ongoing . This is shown on plans prepared by Close, Jensen and Miller, dated December, 1987 consisting of eleven pages . The following conditions must be adhered to for this permit to be valid . We recommend a bond in the amount of $15, 000. be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with erosion & sediment control mreasures. Three (3) blueprint copies of the approved map with all s modifications must be submitted to the IWA/CC within 65 days for review. 3. Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 4. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation and/or use . Installation of a paved road before construction commences. 6. It was indicated at the meeting that parcels 90 and 92 would be deeded to the town. It was recommended that Planning and Zoning accept them as open space. 7. The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on February 23, 1989. Very truly yours, Q 21 i , - John M. Moran, J Chairman `J Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission JMM,Jr. /pmm cc : A.B. Davies , Deputy Town Engineer Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Michael Gantick, Director of Public Works Thomas D°Auria, Building Official Raymond Hallowell, Chairman PZC Close , Jensen & Miller PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Karl Reichle, Mike Garntick, Mel Stead, Fred Shaw, Date: Richard J. SartAr, Gary Tyler, Fire Marshal ?anning, John Shemo FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the following project: &W�t — 6- optkl- Subdivision Site Plan Residential Commercial Industrial Location: zaa" Project Description: !g Future Town-owned property involved? YES NO (a) new streets ( existing frontage also) (b) new open space/recreation area active passive (c) new detention area Planning Department comments : Please let me know bya6jgp if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM TO: Karl REichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead Fred Shaw Date: Ric hard J. Sartor, Gary Tyler, Fire , John Shemo FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning The Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the 1 following project: �.,� Cu,c, ��,r — �.,��� •�_- " l ✓ d U - — Subdivision Site Plan Residential Commercial industrial • Location: �-�-�" 1 0.111 Project Description: Future Town-owned property involved? YES NO (a) new streets (_ existing frontage also) (b) new open space/recreation area active _Y passive (c) _ new detention area Planning Department comments: Please let ate know by ?�a5 lv p if you will have comments on this application so that I can follow up with your department when I do a Planning Department report. ti r ap S �• O � e � a 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ��osoit.CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 25, 1988 Atty. Peter Alter P. 0. Box 935 Glastonbury, CT 06033 re: Appl. #88-007 (-'Ridgefield IVY 0 Subdivision Gentlemen: Please be advised that the public hearing in the above matter has been scheduled for Tuesday, April 12, 1988 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall, 1540 Sullivan Avenue. Signs advertising the hearing must be posted for 10 consecutive days prior to the hearing, and must be clearly visible from the roads. Please have them posted by Friday, April 1, 1988. One sign should be placed at the east side of Felt Road and the other at the west side of Foster Street. The signs can be purchased in the Town Hall for $5.00 each. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman cc: PZC File Applicant M. Banach, Dir. of Planning March 29, 1988 S E A Consultants Inc. Engineers/Architects Principals Arnold B.Goldstein,P.E. Frederick G.Aufiero,P.E. Robert M.Brandon,A.I.A. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. Steph n H.Geribo,P.E. Director of Public Works David T.Goodemote,P.E. Town of South Windsor Bruce E.Soule,P.E. Kenneth M.Stewart,P.E. 1540 Sullivan Avenue Anthony J.Zuena,P.E. South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Associates Steven L.Bernstein,P.E. Re: Ridgefield Section IV Paul F Gabriel,P.E. Job No. 288-8731 Mark Gould,P.E. Michael S.Schultz,PE. Task Order No. 21 Arthur A.Spruch,P.E. Paul C.Ross,P.E. Dear Mr. Gantick: As requested, S E A Consultants Inc. has reviewed the following for the above referenced project: Sheet No. Title Prepared By Date 1 Key Map Close, Jensen & Dec. 1987 Miller 29 3 Subdivision Plan 'r Dec. 1987 4, 52 6 Plan & Profile It Dec. 1987 7, 8 Topography " Dec. 1987 91 10 Erosion & Sedimen- " Dec. 1987 tation Control Plan 11 Erosion & Sedimen- " Dec. 1987 tation Control Details - Storm Sewer Analysis " Jan. 1988 Drainage Compu- tations " Nov. 1987 Stormwater De- tention Pond Edward O. Gardner Report & Associates Oct. 1977 This information was reviewed for compliance with the Town of South Windsor Subdivision and Zoning Regulations dated July 24, 1972, and standard engineering practice. We note the following: 850 Silas Deane Highway W thersfield,CT 06109-3412 (203)721-7993 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridg ,MA 02139-4018 (617)497-7800 Citicorp Park West 100 Foden Road South Portland,ME 04106-2319 (207)775-2281 r LIZA SEA Consultants Inc. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E.Engin rs/Architects March 29, 1988 Page Two Section 4.13.2.1 KEY MAP a. Data block which provides needed zoning information such as , lot area requirements, acreage of tract, open space calculations, etc. should be shown on the Key Map. d. Lines indicating proposed drainage systems with direction arrows should be shown on the Key Map. Section 4.13.2.3 PLOT PLAN b. Proposed streets should be shown with centerline stations on the plan. e. Easements should be shown on the plans with bearings, distances and grantees. Section 4.13.2.4 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP a. All existing and proposed buildings should be shown on the plans. b. Proposed pavement widths should be shown on the plans. c. Existing and proposed sanitary sewers and laterals should be shown with lengths, pipe sizes, slopes and material types on the plans. e. All present wooded areas indicated by foliage lines should be shown. g. Proposed storm drainage systems, showing all lengths, slopes, and pipe sizes should be indicated on the plans. Section 4.13.2.5 PLANS AND PROFILES d. Profiles should show all catch basins with top of frame elevations. g. Profiles should show all sanitary sewer manholes with top of frame elevations. Also, top of foundation eleva- tions for proposed buildings should be shown. Section 4.13.6 CONSERVATION PLAN 1. Soil descriptions should be provided and boundaries delineated on the plans. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. SEA Consultants Inc. March 29, 1988 Engineers/Architects Page Three 2. Erosion and sedimentation control delineation should be labeled along the southern boundary of lot 58. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Fire hydrants are proposed at Stations 7+25 and 12+65 on Ridgefield Drive. The spacing distance exceeds the Fire Marshall's maximum requirement of 500 feet. The locations of the hydrants should be revised and all hydrants should be included on the Topographic Maps. 2. Summerwind Drive has a proposed centerline grade of 8.37 percent. This exceeds the Town's maximum standard of 8 percent. �, fn1, W�I I / �� 4- k4k r y 3. The propose crest and sag vertical curves at Stations 0+88 and 5+81 respectively, on Summerwind Drive should be in- creased to a minimum stopping sight distance of 150 feet based on a 30 mph design speed. The istance between proposed catch basin #2 on Ridgef�W DFIrve and basi #9 and #10 Sum merwind-lbrive exceed e Town's ximum standar of 300 feet. 5. The storm drainage profile on sheet no. 6 indicates that a portion of the 120 feet of 15" RCP will be exposed. The engineer should revise this condition accordingly. 6. The slopes of the proposed 8" sanitary sewers connecting into the existing 8" sanitary off of Ridgefield Drive should be corrected to correlate with the profile. Also, the distance of the 8" sanitary between Stations 16+0 and 18+25 should match with the plan and profile. 7. The Town requires a minimum pavement radius of 42 feet for cul-de-sacs. The radius for the cul-de-sac on Ridgefield Drive should be revised. B. The distance of 339 feet between proposed sanitary sewer manholes #5 and #6 on Ridgefield Drive exceeds the Town's maximum standard of 300 feet,'O.s 9. The size of bituminous curbing should be indicated in the typical roadway section. Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. SEA Consultants Inc. March 29, 1988 Engin rs/Architects Page Four 10. Ground cover over the 8" sanitary sewer between sanitary manholes #8 and #9 on Summerwind Drive is less than the recommended minimum of 4 feet. 11. Proposed sanitary sewer laterals should be labeled on the plans. 12. Ground cover over the 248 feet of 15" RCP between catch basins #10 and #13 on Summerwind Drive is less than the Town's minimum requirement of two feet. 13. Proposed sanitary manhole #9 on Summerwind Drive is shown with an inside drop. The Town prefers outside drops for sanitary manholes. 14. The engineer is indicating that grading will be done to existing lots #31/75 on Ridgefield Drive, #32/73 on Krawski Drive and #19/66 and #38/67 on Summerwind Drive. Sloping rights will have to be obtained 4rom the land owners unless the grading is modified. 15. The flow line elevation of catch basin #8 on Ridgefield Drive on the profile is incorrect. It should read 254.26. 16. The engineer has submitted a detention analysis (Highgate Estates, 1977, Everett O. Gardner & Associates) for 10, 25, and 100-year storm frequencies. However, the Town requires zero increase discharge design to be maintained for 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100-year storms. 17. Although the drainage report has indicated that there will essentially be no additional flow to the existing Krawski Drive drainage system, the engineer should submit a storm drainage analysis for this system. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, S E A Consultants Inc. 64me.s R. Bancroft, P.E. JRB:emf Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. S E A Consultants Inc. March 299 1988 Engineers/Architects Page Four 10. Ground cover over the 8" sanitary sewer between sanitary manholes #S and #9 on Summerwind Drive is less than the recommended minimum of 4 feet. 11. Proposed sanitary sewer laterals should be labeled on the plans. 12. Ground cover over the 248 feet of 151' RCP between catch basins #10 and #13 on Summerwind Drive is less than the Town's minimum requirement of two feet. 13. Proposed sanitary manhole #9 on Summerwind Drive is shown with an inside drop. The Town prefers outside drops for sanitary manholes. 14. The engineer is indicating that grading will be done to existing lots #31/75 on Ridgefield Drive, #32/73 on Krawski Drive and #19/66 and #38/67 on Summerwind Drive. Sloping rights will have to be obtained-from the land owners unless the grading is modified. 15. The flow line elevation of catch basin #8 on Ridgefield Drive on the profile is incorrect. It should read 254.26. 16. The engineer has submitted a detention analysis (Highgate Estates, 1977, Everett O. Gardner & Associates) for 10, 25, and 100-year storm frequencies. However, the Town requires zero increase discharge design to be maintained for 2, 109 25, 50 and 100-year storms. 17. Although the drainage report has indicated that there will essentially be no additional flow to the existing Krawski Drive drainage system, the engineer should submit a storm drainage analysis for this system. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, S E A Consultants Inc. A Oa4mes R. Bancroft, P.E. JRB:emf TOmI� apSau� ?d&U&Ot - C � U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 OR-CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511 March 30, 1988 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works 191 RE: Engineering Review - Ridgefield Section IV Please find attached the SEA comments regarding the subject •/I application. In addition the following comments are noteworthy: i 4 c av� h d t rt�il� u./ r,W,�• -to r 6 {itiJ � ►x 2.�t� 1. 'Nonuments to be used at all open space corners. 2. Would not recommend 5% grade in cul-de-sac area. Maximum 3% grade should be maintained. 3 . Sidewalks should be shown for both sides of roads with handicap ramps. Name of street (Summer Wind Drive) may be confused with the -r TownH s existing Summer Hill Drive. 5 .ma.a T•-e�_ �n e ter..+ � 1�. � -fir t�r_a-•�� •••��w w�l�"e•i'�+7� 1'1Tdy"►1_afllc a ■■c--TQwTr�rrrSiTTTL_"G i l V l_V ail Lli i J c v�+—.r.��e s v.� ( Drive Road and house plan should reflect design for mitigating impacts to proposed road and homes and existing homes, considering the cuts involved, i.e. road and lot underdraining. Q4Qs - n oX *r QD 1 os � e 6 . Lot to lot drainage is to be addressed to insure near zero increase in run-off. Typical house and lot grading should be shown. 7 . Slope rights/limits should be noted on plans . 8 . Gravel access road covered by loam to be provided to access drainage outlet. 9 . Construction details needed for CB, MH type of sanitary sewer bedding with detail, per soils, flared-end base support needed. Marcia A. Banach Re: Ridgefield Section IV Page 2. 10. Any driveways in the cul-de-sac will be limited to lots 57 and 58 only. 11. Highwater level at outlet pond should be shown, i.e. discharge pipe should be above it. 12. Road cross section needed for entire Summer Wind Drive along with topo and slope rights from Krawski Drive to Station 4+00. Same for Ridgefield Drive Station 3+50 to 6+00. 13. Formal drainage needed to handle runoff across lot #48. 14 . Stabilization of runoff along rear lot lines of 53-57 and open space should be considered. I would recommend that the comments noted herein be addressed prior to any action by the Commission. Should you have any questions regarding the above matter, please contact me. MJG/jsv cc: Engineering File PZC File Correspondence t - w+� 1.a.9 O'er� -���S a!/�/!� �t� ' �{ ��., ,i 2^ �..�a' C%'D.!ifs' '��d ._'(' y t-;�►cy�' (!_�` '� -w `y- �t i 1 1) O c � f r� ATE RIDGEFIELD ESTATES SECTION IV d vas to create 25 lots on 22 .4 acres '�. re iv ous phases of the subdivision were approved under the old open space requirements . At the time that the new open space regulations were adopted (9/10/85) it was stated in the/' r'`inutes that any developments cur en 1 up4i�,r way would still be overned under the old re ulationst us s subdivision g g falls under the old requirements . /I 2. The minimum lot size for this is open space subdivision is 17,500 square feet. The lots proposed range from 17,500 to 62,301 sq. ft (1 .4 acres) , with 4 lots under 1/2 acre, 16 lots between 1/2 and 3/4 acre and 5 lots over 1 acre in size. They appear to meet all the zoning requirements with respect to dimensional requirements; however, we do need verification that all lots conform to the 10,000 sq. ft. buildable area requirement. El a fied the key---ma-Rr-which,_to zIs_jua-t--eve_ €ter-- -- - om tb, �- .ti•+,• u subdivision map nor Phas I� r- n fT_9 - � j I would like clarification of what open space goes with which phase, •- th �r�-'s`r"�--�^r t�„ '^"' '^..�' '� .. rr i-nd-ca e ) 1 g- z en spa o f-the ®.�ito p�u yeaccounting of open space for all phases of Ridgefield so we can determine that the open space dedication ,,�� (1 requirements are fully met. � �- -- _ A 50 R.O.W. has been r left at the northeast end of the cul de sac to provide access into this new open space area. �f 3 . The road network to be built will be an extension of Ridgefield Drive 600 feet ending in alit cul de sac, and a road stub off of Krawski Drive, Summerwind Drive, will be extended up to Ridgefield Drive. Town staff are in agreement that the engineering difficulties involved in an extension of Ridgefield Drive through to Foster Street are overwhelming, and we support the applicants request that the street not be extended. 1. o 1LA A h- 6�1 ,� l S�� f -� A.-A4L �4 e i S Ind CP_ cs /..e 4 . The site will be serviced by_(Connect icut water and town sewers . The Supt. of Pollution Control has indicated that WPCA approval is required. 5 . There are no 100 year f loodplain on the site nor inland wetlands . This application has been heard and approved by the IWA/CC with the following conditions: a. Road must be paved before construction begins b. a $15,000 bond be posted to ensure compliance with US measures c. and they recommend to P&Z that they accept parcel # 90 & 92 as open space. 6 . Only two driveways will be cut onto the cul de sac on Ridgefield Dr. We would like to see a note that the driveways will be spaced widely apart to facilitate snow storage. 7 . Sidewalks are proposed on the north side of Ridgefield Dr. and on the east side of Summerwind Drive. The town would like to see sidewalks on both sides of the interior streets, and also on Foster Street to close the gap across the 50' ROW. . 8 . The sightline at the intersection of Ridgefield Drive and Felt raod appears to be adequate. `T a S� ?fa,� 1-6 eG tx(n a-e- 9 . I would note that lots shown on the key map as previously approved lots #20 and 21 at the E end of Krawski Drive are in actuality not approved lots, per Phase II approval letter. If approved, the planning department would like to see the following modifications in addition to items already noted: KEY MAP arrows indicating direction of drainage flow shown on legend PLOT PLAN Need note that all lots conform to 10,000 squarefeet buildable area requirement Lots should be shown in their entirety on one sheet (lots 55, 59 ) Setbacks should be coincident with easements (lots 57, 58) Identify to whom easements granted Monuments are required at all angle points of open space land cAA 0 o-k� F-at'e Traffic control signs as required by Traffic Authority (Police Chief) must be identified on the map Street centerline stations required TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Show pavement width Are there any wooded areas? show foliage line l need -f -awn- af--S�oth GENERAL COMMENTS The key map should show the 500' limits commencing from the boundaries of the open space. 61 l Per 6r (i f4 7`� �l�� " r %✓ , ' �� _ i �40 af,<� y r � 0740s ?d&U&O& s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER THURSDAY, MARCH 31, 1988 THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 1988 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 12, 1988 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall to consider the following: 1. Application of JFI Associates, Inc. for a Zone Change from I to RC for property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Sullivan Av d Rye Street, east of Fire House No. 3. 2. Application LaCa°tia C n ruction Company for an 18-lot Open Space 'Subdivision o proper located east of Felt Road and we of Foster Str , -30 Zone. 3. Application of Donald W. Fish for a Zone Change from RR to RC for property located near the 5-Corners area, north of Route 30, west of Sullivan Avenue, and east of Community Road (formerly known as the Wapping Community Church's Community Center) . Copies of these applications and maps more clearly defining the properties are on file in the office of the Town Clerk and/or the Planning Department of the Town of South Windsor. At this hearing, interested persons may appear and be heard, and written recommendations will be received. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. , Chairman Marshall Montana, Secretary RIDGEFIELD IV -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS KEY MAP Where are arrows indicating direction of drainage flow shown on legend? PLOT PLAN Need note that all lots conform to 10,000 squarefeet buildable area requirement Lots should be shown in their entirety on one sheet (lots 55, 59) Setbacks should be coincident with easements (lots 57, 58) Identify to whom easements grante Monuments are required at all angle points of open space land Traffic control signs as required by Traffic Authority (Police Chief) must be identified Street centerline stations required TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Show pavement width Wooded areas? show foliage line Drainage rights acquired from Town of South Windsor? GENERAL COMMENTS Open space improvement plan needed It appears that open space identified on key map as parcels 90 and 92 is to be deeded to the Town as part of this application. If so, the key map should show the 500' limits commencing from the boundaries of the open space. If this application is approved with the road configuration as presented, the sidewalks on Foster Driv must be connected. 1 We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2. The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. Th undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE NAME ADDRESS J&j&A& w� 117i 4&aJ-k),&Ll r . AN N,Q I 0 G� ,uoo CJ LA � _ 4 j 6 1 rr , J We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2 . The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DA E N ADDRESS 7 4AZ ' Po� Ck4VS(,- 5 14�& 40 'A(zk. t YA IFr ,!�- t4eid- Aeli �e ywh� AA%�4 W 14��z4� s3 xr-dotl 'P&d /Q/ �)Ax k acnC�A'er-A- 4C, 4::-,jaAS g1ll r0_o4 1�� ( �z& � 4q V// 611 e We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2 . The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3 . The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE NAME ADDRESS 4 66 4-- FAA Li 6--th a(�d Ltjit ? "Zp rve--a 4 Acr� b 8 23 OIcAIV41 y/l/ be"ve, rz3 z 3 0/Le t 7 Oeoc4ed 411 9 - t AP �r `1 t r \� ,ql 7 /sr<i- ft)rp�6p /�� _ �f- e7 4nAAt; kL&� PZZ-" (del 06-7 . ta L" AIt Z" 0 /-, g -7 -�� Z6S 42c N�AGO r'ficc /J.E. 2-65 lfiic.c. pec, We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2 . The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE ram/ NW ADDRESS 1 11 1 1 / gg n - -n l ORC 4 /Ve 6 ", ( ►�� a� We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2. The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE NAME ADDRESS d C> q_1 C) G &uXL�k 4v�-egq'� 4 -d' 7 2 Or-c A O'� 1rL4"'11_rff&dQ_v y--9 Sty �`', �R' G��,•,T., .�� _. ...,— �-244 R We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2 . The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3 . The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE N ADDRESS l S j J1 C)C�Ltwl 6 t/I &44/S A JkAA 3�c psi -Fos - . r VVV � A I � L ��.a. , We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2. The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE NAME ADDRESS 70 7 t3 1J.A J� ' ��- � - A2v 11 oqq.�� YYor�'C-1 Kr-4 u.1 r LZ 1 leg*xJ,5�4; � c We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2 . The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly oppos d to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE NAME ADDRESS /z L' We the undersigned support the subdivision Application for Ridge- field Section IV (Application #88-007) for the following reasons: 1. It will complete the Ridgefield Subdivision and maintain its neighborhood-like qualities. 2 . The plans as presented, preserves intact the Open Space which is a valuable asset to both the neighborhood and the Town of South Windsor. The natural and scenic qualities of this particular parcel of Open Space will permanently be preserved. 3. The plans as presented without the road connecting through to Foster Street protects the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood without any adverse affects to anyone else. The undersigned furthermore want to go on record as being strongly opposed to any new road extension from the Ridgefield Subdivision that would connect to Foster Street. DATE N ADDRESS o - lei K w/l/V3, 1 ,51 PALM<Z ,ill k8 EXHIBIT 1 Volume 229 Page N° 83 _ FORM M• CONNSCnCUT WAIW►M DF" [� •u•��."■..,..•• ....w.M. �on.3I� r � A •� i to , iUill i�:ii �'t�F � y.1� �lllt•. girl Ii Know Vt. That JOSEPH A. KR;,NSKI, JR. of the Town of South Windsor, � County of Hartford and State of Connecticut for the consideration of TWENTY-ONE THOUSAND ($21,000.00) DOLLARS received to his full satisfaction of Z:.::E VEILLEUX of the Town of South ' Windsor and RAYMOND FORTIER of the Town of West Hartford, both of the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut •s 10 Conveance Tax receweo A U 1 Tcwn Clerx of South vi=i sor t does give, grant,bargain.sell and confirm unto the said RENE VEILLEUX and RT,YMO`D FORTIER all that certain piece or parcel of land located in the Town of South Windsor westerly of Foster Street as shown on a certain m$p or • plan entitled "Land to be acquired by Rene Veilleuxt Raymond Fortier from Joseph Krawski Foster Street South Also February Windsor, Conn. , 1977 Scale 1" - 80' Revised 4/15/77 John J. Lawrence z Assoc. Inc. Consulting Engineers i Surveyors Farmington, Conn."+which map or plan is to be filed in the South Windsor Town Clezks Office. Said premise 1 are more particularly bounded and described as follows, to wit: Commencing at an iron pin set in the northeasterly line of premises now or formerly of Joseph A. Krawski, Jr. and the southeasterly line of premises now or formerly of Rene Voilloux et al which iron pin is five hundred twenty-five and forty-five one-hundredths (525.45) feet as ncasured along a course of S64.28'24" E (being the boundary line as referenced heretofore between said premise of Krawski and said premises of Veilleux et al) from said iron pin to the inter- section of said boundary line with the general westerly line of Foster Street; thence turning and moving S32.20147" W two hundred twenty-two and seven one-hundredths (222.07) feet to a stake; thence turning and moving S 22.29129" W thirty-five and thirty-three one- hundredths (35.33) feet to a stake; thence turning and moving S 16045156" E five hundred thirty and seven one-hundredths (530.07) feet to an iron pin; thence turning and moving S 3.27155" W forty- three and eighty-two one-hundredths (43.82) feet to a point; (said four courses last described all being along the generally westerly line of premises retained by Joseph A. Krawski, Jr.) ; thence turning i and moving N 76.42*47" W one hundred sixty-nine and eighty-nine one- hundredths (169.89) feet to a merestone; thence turning and moving S 6.18'12" E fifty-seven and eighty-two one-hundredths (57.82) feet to a point; thence turning and moving N 66.54154" W two hundred thirteen and ninety one-hundredths (213.90) feet to an iron pins (said three courses last described all being along the generally northerly line of premises now or formerly ofinarart by etches thane premises retained by Joseph A. Krawski, Jr., P turning and moving N 13.02125" W along the easterly line of premises retained by Joseph A. Krawski, Jr. six hundred fifty-six and fifty- four one-hundredths (656.54) feet to a point; thence turning and moving S 57.39'12" E along trcshundred forty (340)promises tooaniiron , by Joseph A. Krawski, Jr. three pin; thence turning and moving N 32.20147" E along the easterly line of premises retained by Joseph A. Krawski, Jr. three hundred twelve (312) fe t to a point in the southeasterly line of said premises now or formerly of Ron Veilloux et al; thence turning and moving S 64.28124" E along said southeasterly line of promises now or formerl i f Rene Veilleux et al thirty-five and twenty-five one-hundredths (35.25) feet to the point and place of beginning. l I *Revised 4/25/77 1 • � T I • ,1 1 Volume 229 Page N° 84 ' Said premises contain 4.659 acres more or less and are a portion of tI a same premises conveyed to Joseph A. Krawski, Jr. by Quit Claim Deed .t! , of Joseph Krawski dated 12/29/67 and by deed of William J. Krawski and Robert J. Krawski dated May 17, 1976 and recorded in Volume 208, page 285 o! the South Windsor Land Records Grantor reserves to himself his heirs and assigns, forever, the right to continue to utilize said premises for any and all Q•`� agricultur&l or farming purposes, and also, without limitation, the ; right to drain all waters into said brook or pond from the adjacent remaining Fremises of the grantor, whether for agricultural or for building 07: development purposes. The Grantor further reserves to himself, his heirs and assigns, the ; i right to drain or take water from said brook and pond for any and all �.r, •: i purposes including agricultural, domestic, recreational or •V.... z developmental purposes. I Fit lard assigns The Grantor further reserves to.,hi=A&2A>, .. roadway : forever, the right, for future v ' a' remises tni ' or town goved street acr ,, which of way shall.s ::-rows in width ttta� a .,squired by ` ! the Sown.cam South Windsor nor otherr' �tA1� under presentle or future regul a s or p"ravo4 street or roadway but in any I . event not less thhnn s '� ``60y feet in width. Grantor s3ecifically reserves to himself, his heirs and assigns, the right to cultivate or harvest crops on said premises and to ' construct or maintain pipes, culverts, dams or necessary appurtenance i thereto for drainage, irrigation, flood control and general control •.-� of water and water flow. , er reserves to himself, his heirs and assigns, the The Grantor forth -. right to pass and repass over all portions of said premises and to restrict access or means of access by others to the extent reasonably necessary to preserve and protect Grantor's crops or farming operatiol s. - ' ;�'• y ' Grantor further reserves to himself, his heirs and assigns, forever, the right to restrict said Grantees from any development of said premise; which shall conflict with or destroy the predominantly x natural, scenic and open condition of said premises, intending here- by, to reserve a"conservation restriction", pursuant to the provision of Title 47 Section 42 of the Connecticut General Statutes as amended without., limiting the rights of the Grantor, his heirs and assigns as aforesi►id. Said promises are conveyed subject to building, building line and . J zoning restrictions of the Town of South Windsor. _ w Grantor assumes and agrees to pay taxes due the Town of South Windsor , S A on the Grand List of October 1, 1976. ;t Grantor agrees to hold grantee harmless from any claim arising by w caveat to the Tom of South Windsor in Volume 136, r `s reason of a sewer page 276 of the South Windsor Land Records. a.' w' 'r Volume 229 Pare N2 85 II l.11 Ballt Hlllb tU ],' OO the above granted and bargained premises, with the appurtenances thereof, unto them the said grantees their heirs, successors and assigns forever, to them and their own proper use and Ixhoof. .a11t1� a'tIFiII. I the said grantor do for myself and my heirs, executors and administrators,covenant with the said grantees successors,heirs and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these prt:senta. �✓ I am well seized of the premises,as a good indefeasible estate in FEE SIMPLE; and have good right to bargain and scU the same in manner and form as is above written; and that the same is free from all incumbrances whatsoever, except as hereinbefore men- tioned. �I111UI tjjFruiQrP. I the said grantor do by these presents bind myself and MY heirs.executors and administrators forever to WARRANT AND DEFEND the above granted and bargained premises to theta �. the said grantee a, their successors, heirs and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as hereinbeforr mentioned. Sit Miturso M11raDf. I have hereunto set MY hand and seal this a3/ day of in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy—seven Signed, Sealed and Delivered in presence of n GL f s h A. Krawski Jr. '•l` �G GLD •/Z ,C Gt,/ Jo ep y I LP M Gtoru )}. Y*Y/N i s fkate of (gonnerfi ut. cuunig of Hartford AR. 4`7atiBk•�-��ecxsT� A. D. 1977 .L M 1 Personally Appeared JOSEPH A. KRAWSKI, JR. ' Signer and Sealer o�the foregoing lndrumnd, and acknouokdged fhe lame to be HIS 1 free act and deed before me. Received For Record Au,—bust 23, 1977 at �ary Public 3:48 pm ?le47 U,M.l"/A Charles N. Ene s Commierioner o f te Superior Court Town Clerk Y f (LACAVA EX 1+ 7-5 THRu M RIDGEFIELD ESTATES, PHASE IV SUBDIVISION APPLICATION LaCava Construction Company South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission April 12, 1988 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION A Certified copy of warranty deed to LaCava for proposed subdivision property B Memo from town planner re:exemption of Ridgefield IV from 9/20/85 open space subdivision zoning regulation amendment C Pre - 9/20/85 open space subdivision zoning regulation D Road requirements from Ridgefield II subdivision approval E Minutes from 6/23/87 and 7/28/87 South Windsor TPZ hearings F Engineer's traffic report G Engineer's conceptual plan and profiles for roadway H Previous engineer's report re:feasibility of road connection into Foster Street I Certified copy of warranty deed to previous owner of open space/detention basin reserving rights to use said open space in grantor J Certified copy of warranty deed to Town of South Windsor for open space/detention basin K Memo from town planner requesting necessary revisions to Ridgefield IV subdivision plans L Deed from LaCava to owner of Ridgefield II, Lot 32 reserving slope rights Qnd map'showing tV-w-rv,4 slope rqc s�vr iRialAeld �, ��q M Open spaces map �010 N •tt � r Cary K. Tykv s Chief of Police 4c Police Services April 12, 1988 Mr. Wesley Sargent CLOSE, JENSEN & MILLER, P .C . 1137 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Ct . 06109-4201 Dear Mr . Sargent , Enclosed please find one copy of the planned subdivision known as Ridgefield Dr . and Summerwind Dr . . The necessary traffic control signs have been located on the map at the required location. A description of those signs and their locations are as follows: 1 . ) One Stop Sign on Krawski Dr . (northbound) at Ridgefield Dr . . 2 . ) One Stop Sign on Summerwind Dr . (southbound) at Krawski Dr. . 3 . ) One Stop Sign on Summerwind Dr . (northbound) at Ridgefield Dr. . 4 . ) One "No Outlet" Sign on Ridgefield Dr . (eastbound) just east of the intersection of Summerwind Dr. . In addition to the aforementioned signs it would be deeply appreciated if a "25 MPH" Speed Limit Sign could be posted on Ridgefield Dr . (eastbound) as you enter the developement from Felt Rd . . I thank you for your assistance in this matter . If there are any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely , G; / Sgt . Gerald 7ewis cc: f ile Marcia Banach (Director of Planning - Town of S .W. ) 151 Sand Hill Rood • South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 • (203) 644-2551 i OUTLINE OF . PRESENTATION TO SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 12, 1988 ON BEHALF OF RANDALL & LINDA BUTTERO - 221 _FOSTER STREET SEBASTIAN & EVE CARAMMA - 241 FOSTER STREET 1. We support the application of LaCava for subdivision approval as presented. 2. This means we oppose the extension of Ridgefield Drive easterly through the 50 foot right of way between our homes to Foster Street. 3. This was a conceptual plan prepared by the developer's engineer at the request of the Commission in early 1987; and since it has been considered, although not part of the present plan, the record should reflect our opposition, which is: I. The road going through the 50 foot right of way would have to be constructed in a way that would destroy the livability and value of our homes: (a). The grade is so steep from Foster Street westerly at the area between our houses that: * see Traffic * (1). Large quantities of fill would be needed. Report of * (2) . Over 400 feet of retaining walls with bridge type May 20, 1987 railings would be needed on both sides to contain the roadway embankment, to be maintained by the Town. * (3) . The height of the retaining walls would vary from 8% to 20 feet. (4). The level of the roadway would be as high as the top of the northerly side of the Buttero house in order to reach the level of Foster Street. LAW OFFICES (5) . Occupants of automobiles on this elevated roadway or CHARDM.R)rrENBAND causeway would look right into the Buttero and 1734 ELLINGTON ROAD Caramma houses, and the view of the property owners UTM WINDSOR CONN 06074 would be a retaining wall and automobiles going -- right by their living areas, with the attendant dirt, (203)644.2456 noise and gas fumes. It would be an intolerable JURIS NO 50412 living situation. (b). Slope rights, construction easements and drainage easements would be needed from the Butteros and Carammas. They would not be given voluntarily which would then mean eminent domain (condemnation) to obtain them. The only agency that has the power of eminent domain is the Town Council. The Commission and/or developer would have to request the Council to exercise this power. In the unlikely event it did, (1). Our first line of defense in Court would be that the road is not essential and that its main purpose would be to assist a private developer. Therefore, the condemnation would not be for a public purpose and would be illegal. i -2- (2) . The loss in value to the property owners would be so severe that the Court might find that the condemnatiOTL is a total taking of the property, not just the slope rights and easements, in which case the Town would end up owning both properties and paying full value for each. The Buttero house is worth $275,000 and Carammas is worth $380,000; so the Town would have to pay damages of approximately $655,000. I doubt that this Council or any other Council would expose itself to pay $655,000 in this situation. * (c) . Both Randall Buttero and Sebastian Caramma went to the Town Hall prior to purchasing their homes; and were advised that because of the steep grade a road over that 50 foot right of way would be highly unlikely. (d). In talking with Marcia Banach, the Town Planner, she said that she and Town staff believe such a road to be i%W impractical and imprudent.q* (e). Close, Jensen & Miller, in its May 20, 1987 traffic report (part of the P & Z file) said that the road is unnecessary, (there are other nearby, adequate east-west roads) , and im practicable. II. The street would seriously disrupt the large open space area and streambelt environmental corrider easterly of Ridgefield Street now enjoyed in safety by neighborhood children. (1). 700 feet of the roadway would bisect the open space with a 30 foot wide ribbon of black top, with additional width for the embankment. LAW OFFICES (2). 6 2 feet depth of fill for the roadway embankment through the :HARDM.RITTENBAND wetland/pond area would be required. 1734 ELLINGTON ROAD (3). The roadway would reduce the storm water retention capacity U 4 LLI R CONK 06074 —_ of the existing retention facility. (203)644.2456 JURIS NO 50412 (4) . The road would become a speedway at that point endangering safety; it would add noise, gas fumes, parking, littering, etc. , that would harm the environment as well as destroy much needed open space. For all of the above reasons, we urge the Commission to approve the appli- cation as presented, without the road, and put this issue to rest once and for all. *It is the Town, the condemning authority, that would have to pay. There is no authority to require the developer to pay the damages. ��owN aE,<� C oie Sioa� `IW • e � u 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 SOR•co AREA CODE 203/644-2511 13 April 1988 Atty. Ralph Alexander .Brady, Willard, & Alexander 303 Burnside Ave. East Hartford, CT 06074 Dear Ralph; Will you kindly advise regarding the legal status of a Public Hearing item advertised in the Journal Inquirer's Legal Notices section with the wrong number of lots (18 lots were indicated instead of the correct number, 25) . A phone call followed by a written legal opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman :rt cc: M. Banach, Director of Planning ALTER AND PURTILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 155 SYCAMORE STREET PETER JAY ALTER P.O.BOX 935 SHARON HOLLAND PURTILL GLASTONBURY,CONNECTICUT 06033 TELEPHONE 659-0569 GEORGE MORROW PURTILL AREA CODE 203 JOHNS ROSANIA REGINA M.WEXLER April 18 1988 OF COUNSEL. JOEL E JANENDA ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK To: Marcia Banach, Director of Planning From: Alter and Purtill Re: Notice Defect in LaCava/Ridgefield IV Subdivision Application ISSUES: 1. Is the mistaken description in the notice of public hearing of the above-referenced application as an eighteen (18) lot, rather than twenty-five (25) lot, proposed subdivi- sion a serious enough defect to justify reversal of commis- sion approval of the application if an aggrieved person takes a judicial appeal? 2 . Could LaCava successfully assert the notice's error as an appeal ground if the commission rejects the subdivision application? SUMMARY: The short answer to both issues is NO. Although there are no officially reported Connecticut judicial decisions analyzing the required standard of accu- racy of a notice of public hearing concerning a proposed sub- division under CGS Section 8-26, it is apparent from cases interpreting CGS Section 8-3 regarding zone changes and regulation amendments and CGS Section 8-7 regarding ZBA mat- ters that a notice of public hearing must fairly and suffi- ciently apprise potentially-affected individuals about the nature and character of the proposed action so that they may prepare intelligently for the hearing and object to the ac- tion if they choose. The notice need not describe the pro- posed action in detail or with exactitude, but it cannot be misleading. Thus, the issues here are whether the LaCava no- tice fairly and sufficiently informed the public so that they might prepare for the hearing and whether they were harmfully misled. Although these are factual issues that turn upon the specific circumstances, it appears from the cases reviewed below that the LaCava notice was sufficiently informative and was not fatally misleading. ALTER AND PU RTI LL With respect to whether LaCava could challenge the pub- lished notice on appeal if the application is rejected, it appears from an unofficially reported Connecticut trial court decision that without additional critical procedural failures such as failure to publish a decision, an applicant is not entitled to challenge the sufficiency of a notice of public hearing. Again, there are no officially reported Connecticut decisions expressly so holding. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS RE: NOTICE OF PUB- LIC HEARING Statutory Language: CGS Section 8-26 allows (but does not require) a plan- ning and zoning commission to hold a public hearing concern- ing a subdivision proposal in its judgment considering the specific circumstances and requires the commission to hold a public hearing concerning all resubdivision proposals. The statute requires prior newspaper notice of the hearing and describes the publication deadlines, but not the required contents of the notice. CGS Section 8-26. South Windsor's municipal regulations do not impose any added substantive re- quirements and merely mandate that public hearing notices be as prescribed by statute. South Windsor Subdivision Regula- tions Section 3 .3 .d. Judicial Interpretation of Statutory Notice Reauirements There are no officially reported Connecticut judicial decisions determining the validity standards of public hear- ing notices for proposed subdivisions published pursuant to CGS Section 8-26. But it is clear from decisions interpret- ing other statutes requiring publication of hearing notices concerning proposed actions by zoning boards and commissions and other municipal agencies that a uniform standard has ALTER AND PU RTI LL evolved for these notices under Connecticut law. The notice of public hearing must fairly and sufficiently apprise potentially-affected individuals about the nature and charac- ter of the proposed action so that they may prepare intel- ligently for the hearing, and it must not mislead them. Passero v. Norwalk Zoning Commission, 155 Conn. 511 (1967) ; Lunt v. Wallingford Zoning Board of Appeals, 150 Conn. 532 (1963) ; Griswold v. New London Planning and Zoning Commis- sion, 13 Conn. L. Trib. 1, pg. 12 col. 3 (1/5/87) ; Olsen v. Torrington Zoning Board of Appeals, 12 Conn. L. Trib. 21, pg. 38 col. 2 (5/26/86) ; Welles v. East Windsor, 185 Conn. 586 (1981) ; Bosley v. New Haven Zoning Board of Appeals, 13 Conn. L. Trib. 25, (6/29/87) . Informative Notices In Passero, supra, the zoning commission published no- tice of a public hearing concerning proposed amendments to its regulations, including a proposal that the disputed regulation be entirely deleted. The notice stated the regulation's citation but did not describe the subject mattter. The Supreme Court emphasized several factors in holding that the notice was sufficiently informative to en- able intelligent preparation: (1) the notice specifically identified each proposed change and cited the regulations by number; (2) the applicant complied with the statutory re- quirement contained in CGS Section 8-3 (a) that a copy of the proposed regulation or plan be filed with the town clerk ten (10) days in advance so that the public may inform them- selves, and the notice so stated that maps and petitions had been filed and were available for examination; (3) the stat- ute (CGS Section 8-3 (a) ) allows but does not require that the proposal itself be printed in the notice; and (4) the statute is silent about requiring a summary or description of the proposal's subject matter in the notice. The LaCava notice clearly exceeded the notice in Passero in terms of informa- tiveness on its face. It not only described the subject mat- ter of the proposed change (an open space subdivision) , but ALTER AND PU RTI LL also identified the applicant (LaCava) , the applicable zone (AA-30) , and the affected location (east of Felt Road and west of Foster Street) . A reference in the notice regarding the filing of plans and actual filing are unnecessary because CGS Section 8-26, unlike CGS Section 8-3 (a) , contains no such requirement, although plans were on file and available to the public. In fact, one might argue that the LaCava application is governed by a lesser notice standard than the Passero standard because CGS Section 8-26 contains no substantive re- quirements, as compared to CGS Section 8-3 (a) which requires that the proposal be filed and authorizes that it be pub- lished in the notice. Griswold, supra, involved an appeal from the granting of a zone change where the notice published pursuant to CGS Sec- tion 8-3 (a) only mentioned the applicant's parcel and the zone change affected fourteen (14) parcels altogether. The Court upheld the validity of the notice under Passero's re- quirement that it be fairly and sufficiently informative to allow intelligent preparation for the hearing. It pointed out the facts that the notice: identified the applicant, identified the attorney representing him, described the sub- ject parcel, and made reference to the plans on file and their availability for examination. Uninformative Notices In Lunt, supra, the local regulations authorized the zoning board to allow a building put to a nonconforming use to be structurally altered and changed to another nonconform- ing use no more objectionable in character. Pursuant to this regulation, the applicant obtained a special exception to re- place his mink ranch with a shopping center in a rural zone, but the notice only described the existing use and not the proposed new use (only that it was a lessor nonconforming use) . The Supreme Court held that the notice did not fairly and sufficiently apprise the public because neighboring property owners might honestly dispute whether a shopping center is more objectionable than a mink ranch and the zoning regulations do not so rank nonconforming uses. ALTER AND PU RTI LL In Olsen, supra, the applicants were granted a special exception to build multi-family housing in a single-family residential zone. The notice identified the applicant and zone, but only gave a proposed street as the location and only described the special exception requested as one for "a multi-family dwelling" even though there were plans for seven (7) buildings and parking areas. Citing Lunt, the Court held that the notice did not adequately inform potentially af- fected individuals since the location given was a paper street still uncleared and unpaved and the general public would have no way of knowing whether they might be affected. The notices in both of these cases are distinguishable from that in the LaCava proposal because of their incomplete- ness with respect to the nature of the proposed change, as in Lunt, or, as in Olsen, with respect to detail concerning the location and magnitude of the proposed change necessary for a public member to decide whether he is affected by it and should support or oppose it. The LaCava notice clearly de- scribed the proposed use (open space subdivision) and reason- ably identified the location (between Felt Road and Foster Street) . Although it mistakenly stated the extent of the change (eighteen (18) lots instead of twenty-five (2 5) lots) , this is not nearly as serious in its incompleteness as the notice in Olsen. Midleading Notices In Welles, supra, the published notice described a pro- posal to build a municipal police station and ambulance fa- cility "on Town-owned land located on Woolam Road and adja- cent to the Town Highway garage" . The Town later decided to locate the complex on the same parcel but five hundred feet (5001 ) away from the garage and closer to the Welles' prop- erty on Scantic Road. The Supreme Court reiterated the in- formative purpose of public notice and further defined the standard, stating that the notice need not describe the pro- posed action in detail or with exactitude but also cannot be misleading. The Court held that the notice was invalid be- cause the approved revised plans did not locate the facility adjacent to the town garage and oriented it toward Scantic Road rather than Woolam Road. ALTER AND PU RTI LL In Bosley, supra, the applicant obtained both a lot area variance and a front yard variance, but the published notice only mentioned the request for the front yard variance. The Court repeated the principles announced in the cases de- scribed above and held that the notice was not sufficiently informative and was misleading. Regarding the characteriza- tion of the notice as misleading, the Court emphasized that the director of planning at the hearing's outset indicated that the notice was improper and that the application must be tabled or readvertised, and that the zoning board did not in- dicate an intent to disregard his suggestions and to act on both requests. The Court found that this action (approving both after apparently putting off action on both) was so mis- leading as to negate any claim that the appellants may have had actual or constructive notice of the hearing. The cir- cumstances surrounding the hearing in Bosely, are substan- tially different from those in the LaCava application, where the notice's inaccuracy was discussed on the record but the Commission made no representations that it would put off con- sideration of the application. Again, the degree of noncompliance in the cited cases seems to be much worse than that in the LaCava application. Welles involved a situation where a public member reading the notice might not even know that he is affected since the pro- posed building was eventually erected on his street rather than a different street mentioned in the notice and erected five hundred feet (5001) away from a landmark to which the notice stated it would be built adjacent. Bosley involved an approval of two (2) variance applications where the notice had only described one and the board implicitly represented that it would refrain from considering either application un- til a later meeting after a new notice was published. By comparison, the misleading character of the erroneous repre- sentation in the LaCava notice is negligible. The notice identified in detail the proposal, the applicant, the loca- tion, and the zone, and afforded a sufficient basis for a public member to prepare and decide his position. ALTER AND PU RTI LL Defect in Published Notice Raised by an Unsuccessful Appli- cant There are several cases in which an unsuccessful appli- cant has successfully challenged a zoning board's decision because he did not receive the actual notice of a public hearing required by statute. Colonial Beacon Oil Co. v. Hartford Zoning Board of Appeals, 128 Conn. 351 (1942) ; Bencivenga v. Milford Zoning Board of Appeals, 2 Conn. App 384 (1984) . But there are no officially reported Connecticut decisions in which a court has reversed the denial of an ap- plication because of a defect in the published notice of hearing. There is one unofficially reported decision which seems to suggest the test to be applied. Werner v. Easton Planning & Zoning Commission, 12 Conn. L. Trib. 31, pg. 15 col. 3 (8/11/86) . In Werner, the commission denied the Plaintiff's permit application to excavate and remove soil from her property but failed to publish its notice of deci- sion and then failed to publish the statutorily-required notice of hearing on the second permit application. The Court reversed the commission's denial of the permit applica- tion and cited authority that notice requirements are manda- tory and jurisdictional with respect to the commission's failure to publish both notices. But the Court did not indi- cate that failure to publish the notice of hearing, by it- self, would have been grounds for reversing the commission's decision, and it does not appear that the Court would have done so if the commission had not also failed to publish its notice of decision. Q' M 'e,` H r O-P sau& ?0&U&0t O � / 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•CO� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 �SO .7-to ((4 rk March 30, 1988 TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM. Michael J. Ganti ,'ck Director of Public Works RE: Engineering Review --Ridgefield Section IV Please find attached the SEA comments regarding the subject application. In addition the following comments are noteworthy: ..rl: Monuments to be used at all open space corners. Would not recommend 5% grade in cul-de-sac area. Maximum 3% grade should be maintained. Sidewalks should be shown for both sides of roads with handicap ramps. -4 Name of street (Summer Wind Drive) may be confused with the Town's existing Summer Hill Drive. e oad/ndouse n should c atin actsropos road and c� p�✓ ref1 design fo mitig g ps and ex ng homes, c siderin cu involved, Oki�q ' i.e. road and lot under aining. saki `' coo 0 �1 � � � f� A �,. S J � �f 4 'M' � k w � ° *n$1 M" � • ��'� Lot to lot drainage is f­f. v= pica 1 house,--and -Jot-gradirlq-'should be shown, L-1r•.. -6- 5�..�,���7J • be noted on lans G d- r S, Slope rights/limits should P V G�J' access�.,rur6ad coverecj.���y loam to be .provided to access ge outlet. sr ` Construction details needed for CB, MH type of sanitary Lssewer bedding with detail, per soils, flared-end base support needed. a Marcia A. Banach R : Ridgefield Section IV Page 2. Any driveways in the cul-de-sac will be limited to lots 57 and 58 only. 3,1! Highwater level at outlet pond should be shown, i.e. discharge pipe should be above it. Road cross section needed for entire Summer Wind Drive along with topo and slope rights from Krawski Drive to Station 4+00. Same for Ridgefield Drive Station 3+50 to 6+00. Formal drainage needed to handle runoff across lot #48. Stabilization of runoff along rear lot lines of 53-57 and open space should be considered. I would recommend that the comments noted herein be addressed prior to any action by the Commission. Should you have any questions regarding the above matter, please contact me. (i 5f_ MJG/jsv cc: Engineering File PZC File Correspondence "''�:' i• °y' :.- :,r�w�-=�'�4.r,; !4.��{y`�Awn r x. :S. 1r. t gar_« f'C y �Y. r m .c Pipe Cap. 0 1 Rainfall Length Slope Size of Mean ' 1 Drainage Area Time Discharge of of Flowing ' Intensity � m Manhole Station L A � ACA ECA t I I q Pipe Pipe Pipe Velocity Full < ' N o. N o. S. Ft. FU Ft. in. F.P.S. C.F.S. Acres Acres Acres Mins.• Mint. In. /Mr. C.F. � a v �� t yr, Z,4 a. ' 6 � �c IO VW L 2 -7,?/ I Kra , r. 3• 2 COle Irk , o rk � oo00 �� N m rn C 1 O b Tia Co.#t Vaa� Rainfall Length Slope Pipe Cap. Drainage Area Time Discharge Size of Mean o ' t n q of of Flowing Manhole Sta io Intensity Q Pipe PI Pipe Pipe Velocity -c AA C ACA ECA .0 t It 1 Full N o. No. Acres Acres Acres Mins.' Mint. In. /Hr. C.F.S. Ft. Ft./Ft. In. F.P.S. C.F.S. iA a a /#•z O,Z-tr3,5 3•SS 2O Lo 3 , Q /L•d7 �� I � � Cl lLdS- OP 6 SOC,v eo 4ev i i �� I l/O yr' 1 I ` �,Q� 4.35 3.3>0 3.3a �9 � ,9 �• S� / /,S.S� I ��� I♦ I I �Z f yr 1 I; Vd to D �s-al.� �".S � N_ rP N�r h u 7`� �r�t.J �G/ / / I�O it Z O 1 I i I I �I b ' 1 � � 1 � ALTER AND PURTILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 155 SYCAMORE STREET PETER JAY ALTER P O.BOX 935 SHARON HOLLAND PURTILL GLASTONBURY,CONNECTICUT 06033 TELEPHONE 659-0569 GEORGE MORROW PURTILL AREA CODE 203 JOHNS ROSANIA REGINA M WEXLER June 6, 1988 OF COUNSEL. JOEL E.JANENDA •ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK HAND DELIVERED Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor RECEIVED 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 JUN 68 Reference: Ridgefield IV Subdivision SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. LaCava Construction Company Dear Ms. Banach: On behalf of LaCava Construction Company, this letter will confirm that any deficiency in the legal notice with respect to the Public Hearing as to the number of lots in the subdivision is hereby waived by the owner/applicant as a matter of potential appeal in the event of denial. Yo very truly, �J QVrz— Peter J lter Attorney or LaCava Construction Company pbd cc: LaCava Construction Company 4. Appl. #88-07P, Ridgefield IV Resubdivision, north side Krawski, east side Felt Road. --? to Commission members reviewed comments and concerns from the public hearing, including the acreage and configuration of the open space property. It was noted that deeds remained to be executed for this land, depending on the final acreage forthcoming. Discussed also were elimination of two lots to reconfigure some of the remaining lots to provide additional area for those remaining. Mr. Castro made a motion to extend the meeting 10 minutes, Mrs. Woodcock seconded, and the motion carried unanimously with all regular Commission members voting. More discussion followed concerning the two-lot elimination and revised layout of the remaining lots, as well as providing walkways to Foster Street from the cul-de-sacs. Mr. Castro made a motion to extend the meeting another 10 minutes, Mrs. Woodcock seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Sorenson made a motion to approve the application with the following modifications: 1 . All deeds for open space and roadways; and Easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits. All deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and easements and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. The deeds for the roadways and open space will be held in escrow until completion of the subdivision and then referred to the Town Council for acceptance. 2 . Concrete sidewalks, built to Town specifications, shall be installed on both sides of all new streets. 3 . Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" = 40' , shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have been approved by the Town Engineer. 4 . Drainage for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 5. If, for any reason, finished grading and other site work is not completed, the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In addition, a general grading bond of $30,000 is required for lot-to-lot drainage. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - 10 - JUNE 7, 1988 6 . All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the Water Pollution Control Authority. 7 . Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by Connecticut Water Company. 8. Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Town Manager. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police. 9 . Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. 10 . Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans . If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term, in lieu of a surety bond, said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter of Credit it is holding. 11 . A drainage assessment fee in the amount of $1250 shall be submitted to this Commission. 12. A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of $1,000,000. 13. This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission. 14 . Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 15 . All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 16 . No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's Office. 17 . Sidewalk along Foster Street must be completed to close the 50' gap between lots shown as 105 and 106 on the key map. 18. Driveways on Lots 57 and 58 to be spaced as far apart as possible to facilitate snow removal. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - 11 - JUNE 7, 1988 19 . Lot-to-lot drainage is subject to approval of the Town Engineer. 20. Note complete extent of all slope rights required to construct roads. 21 . Road cross-section is needed for entire Summer Wind Drive and Ridgefield Drive, Station 3+50 to 6+00. 22 . Lots 20 and 21 are not approved and must be removed as lot numbers . 23. Lot 63 is not approved and must be distributed among Lots 62, 64, 65, and 61 . The north side of Ridgefield Drive must have 120' frontage on all lots (Lots 46 - 54) ; Lot 55 must be eliminated. 24 . Lots 59 and 56 must have driveways removed from the cul-de- sac. 25 . Deeds must be provided for all open space parcels, for a total of 10. 1 acres. 26 . Open space requirements by phase must be shown on the plans. 27 . A stone walkway is required between Poster Street and the cul-de-sacs on Krawski Drive and Ridgefield Drive, subject to Town Staff approval. Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets # 1, 2, and 3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans, must be submitted to this Commission to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency / Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Mrs . Evans seconded Mr. Sorenson's motion with the above modifications, and the motion carried 4-3. Voting with the motion were Commissioners Sorenson, Evans, Montana, and Castro. Commissioners Rossi, Woodcock, and Hallowell voted against it. ADJOURNMENT Date approved Respectfully submitted, Rosalyn I . Toper Recording Secretary CLOSE, JENSEN & MILLER, P.C. LIEc UFEM )[F 1('MUMADUTU 1137 Silas Deane Highway WETHERSFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06109-4201 Phone ((203) 563.9375 DATE JOB NO ATTENTION arG Gc- � cZ G 0/5' TO Re ���7r1!^C'►� "T4 �3' N � .win ds0l GENTLEMEN: SOU j0M Zoning WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via & the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Samples ' ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order �^�>� �a�u/6 0;r7f COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 14& IoAlhf 4 1 -_-Z, -v!z Y 100, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS / e cM COPY TO SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. N1111cr, Clo_sc lcnsc znd n � ' DATE �/7�gg SUB SECT , .ELD SEcrasN SHEET NO � :JF g� C'HKD By DATE fziO4F+p1f t.0 JOB NO Cross sac., lovo s cAL9 ED *0 0 0 Q � I � � I i N � o I i � I I I li N a- CO 0 co °` I i I tA � I I I � I ► - - t � d i G I to = = I 00 I N O o1 O o 0 > � > N`1111CT) I-). C . Closs ��. n. �. BY DATE �1 SUBJECT. R�aGi ,�L� S,EtT I� SHEET N(D 2 F 2 CHKD BY DATE jumme -wInd JOB NO Cross SCcT to" LVI N N N N + i I I I . I I � - I N I � O j ! I 1 + + j c ♦ 1 ! I ! I ► I ' i t - I � I i I ' N � � p 1 I g = I I .+ to -� {s ► � � r a N O i�44 H r To o-Ps ?d&U&&t O � Gd s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 Co��,� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 June 8, 1988 Atty. Peter Alter Alter and Purtill 155 Sycamore Street Glastonbury, CT 06033 re: Appl. #88-07P - Ridgefield IV Open Space Resubdivision Gentlemen: We are pleased to advise that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted at its June 7, 1988 meeting to approve the captioned application for a 23-lot open space resubdivision in accordance with Drawings #1 through #11 of 11 prepared by Close, Jensen & Miller revised through 6-7-88, Project No. 3522, and with the following modifications: 1. All deeds for open space and roadways; and Easements for conservation purposes, drainage or utilities, that may be required in connection with the approval of this subdivision, must be submitted to this Commission prior to filing the mylars and issuance of building permits . All deeds must be in accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and easements and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town Attorney. The deeds for the roadways and open space will be held in escrow until completion of the subdivision and then referred to the Town Council for acceptance. 2. Concrete sidewalks, built to Town specifications, shall be installed on both sides of all new streets. 3 . Footing drains are required for each house. Prior to the building of any structure on a lot, a topographic map, drawn to a scale of 1" = 401 , shall be submitted for each lot in the subdivision, showing proposed contours, elevations and the location of the footing drains. No building permits will be issued until the proposed contours, floor elevations and location of footing drains have _be n approved by the Town Engineer. Y Atty. Peter Alter 2 June 8, 1988 4 . Drainage for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. 5 . If, for any reason, finished grading and other site work is not completed, the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This h cash bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In addition, a general grading bond of $30,000 is required for l.ot-to-lot drainage. (6 .," All lots shall be serviced by the Town of South Windsor sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of ` the Water Pollution Control Authority. 7 . Water shall be supplied to this subdivision by Connecticut Water Company. 8 . Street lighting shall be installed on streets, at intersections, and on cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the Town Manager. Street lighting is to be coordinated with the Chief of Police. 9 . Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor. Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of South Windsor, at no expense to the Town. 10. Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer for the purpose of determining subdivision bonding, and all bonds shall be posted prior to filing the plans . P. If the developer chooses to submit a Letter of Credit for a one year term; in lieu of a surety bond; said Letter of Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until completion of the development. If a new Letter of Credit has not been received within 30 days before the expiration date, the Commission may, at its option, call the Letter of Credit it is holding. 11 . A drainage assessment fee in the amount of $1250 shall be submitted to this Commission. 12 . A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this Commission naming the Town of South Windsor as an insured, with a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage in the amount of $1,000,000. 13 . This application is subject to the conditions of approval of the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission. Atty. Peter Alter 3 Jun 8, 1988 14 . Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held with Town Staff. 15 All plans used in the field by the developer must bear the stamp and authorized signature of the Town of South Windsor. 16 . No building permits will be issued until all modifications have been complied with, and the final plans have been filed in the Town Clerk's Office. 7 Sidewalk along Foster Street must be completed to clos th 50' gap between lots shown as 105 and 106 on the key map. 8 Driveways on Lots 57 and 58 to be spaced as far apart as possible to facilitate snow removal. 19. Lot-to-lot drainage is subject to approval of the Town Engineer. 20. Note complete extent of all slope rights required to construct roads. 21 . Road cross-section is needed for entire Summer Wind Drive and Ridgefield Drive, Station 3+50 to 6+00. 22. Krawski Drive Lots 20 and 21 (also shown as #58 and 59 on key map) [Phase II] are not approved and must be removed as lot numbers. 23. Lot 63 is not approved and must be distributed among Lots 62, 64, 65, and 61. The north side of Ridgefield Drive must have 120' frontage on all lots (Lots 46 - 54) ; Lot 55 must be eliminated. 24 . Lots 59 and 56 must have driveways removed from the cul-de- sac. 25 . Deeds must be provided for all open space parcels, for a total of 10.1 acres. 26 . Open space requirements by phase must be shown on the plans. 27 . A stone walkway is required between Foster Street and the cul-de-sacs on Krawski Drive and Ridgefield Drive, subject to Town Staff approval. Atty. Peter Alter 4 June 8, 1988 Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets ---# 1, 2, and 3 with the above modifications, together with three blueprint copies of the entire set of plans, must be submitted to this Commission to be stamped and signed. The letters of approval of this Commission, as well as the Inland Wetlands Agency / Conservation Commission, must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk within 90 days. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Ra and F. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman cc: M. Gantick, Director of Public Works F. Shaw, Supt. of Pollution Control J. Collins, Chief Building Official E. Belleville, Assessor W. Lanning, Fire Marshal M. Banach, Planning Director Registrar of Voters Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission ✓ItZC File Architect/Engineer Applicant t°wM sfqc O � c 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 r SOR.Cp� AREA CODE 203 644-2511 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, JUNE 11, 1988 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION At the June 7, 1988 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to take the following actions: 1 . Approve, with modifications, the application of the Wapping Community Church for a Site Plan of Development for property on the north side of the Five-Corners intersection, west of Ellington Road and east of Sullivan Avenue, RR Zone. 2 . Approve,,. with modifications, the application of LaCav Construction Company for an Open Space Subdivision of._ -' prop,Xty east of Felt Road and we.s�t, ®f--Foster '"street, AA-30 Zone. n 3 . Approve, with modifications, the application of Kevin Minguey for a Site Plan of Development for property on the north side of Sullivan Avenue directly opposite Ann Field Plaza, GC Zone. Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 8th day of June, 1988 . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. , Chairman Marshall Montana, Secretary BOND ESTIMATE FORM Project: 121p Street: 7,,,o a 4r r-Iz4�o Pe - .S�Mr����/r,.� P&Z I .D. : g8 - 6 7 P' Engineer: r°,cosE .T/--�SF•y G�MLG.� Date: U Ia7,19hr Unit Item Description Unit Quantity Price Cos - 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS 2 . Strip & Stockpile Topsoil CY 3 . Earth Excavation CY (Excluding Roadway & Trench) 4 . Roadway Excavation CY 0-4 CY Earth Trench Excavation 5, 6. Earth Trench Excavation 0-10 CY / , �U 3OZ5 7 . Earth Trench Excavation 0-15 CY 8 . Earth Trench Excavation 0-20 CY . 9 . Roadway Excavation (Rock) CY —. 10 . Rock Trench Excavation 0-4 CY 11. Rock Trench Excavation 0-10 CY — 12 . Rock Trench Excavation 0-15 CY — 130 Rock Trench Excavation 0-20 CY 14 . Formation of Subgrade SY ( o b 1.S 0 q Lao L 15 . Subbase Gravel CY 1,d,o / /a 00 �2 0 16 . Processed Aggregate TONS '7s—o JS.f 2G Z S 17 . Common Borrow CY 18.. Gravel Borrow CY 19 . 02 " Bituminous Concrete TONS 46, 0 (Class I) se ' 3$S /_" Bituminous Concrete 2 0 . TONS (Class II) 3� 21 . Six inch Asphalt Lip Curbing LF 3 4 -0 2S d S O 22. Road Widening Complete SY Sub-Total - 1 - Item Description unit Quantity Price CL-3 23 . Concrete Sidewalk ' Wide LF 3 7¢v /S,60 11%7ZG 24 . Asphalt ' Sidewalk Wide LF — STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 25 . 60" RCP Class In Place LF 26 . 54 " RCP Class In Place LF 27. 48 " RCP Class In Place LF 28 . 42" RCP Class In Place LF — 29 . 36" RCP Class In Place LF 30. 30" RCP Class In Place LF 31. 2411 RCP Class In Place LF - 32. 21" RCP Class In Place LF — 33. 18 " RCP Class In Place LF 34 . 15" RCP Class In Place LF / S/p X7 416776. UNDERDRAINS 35 . 6" LF 36. 8" �`G ,E•oo.r ��..-,S LF 7 D 37 . Type "C" Catch Basin EA -cc 0-0 38 . Type "C" Double Grate EA _ 39 . Type "C-L" Catch Basin E.7 3 / ao 3GOO 40. Manhole EA / /SGO 41. Manhole With Drop Inlet EA -- 42 . Manhole Over Ten Ft. EA 43 . Headwall EA 44 . Endwall EA 45 . /S Flare Ends EA J 6-oC) 46 . Special Structure EA — 47 . Bedding: Type: erut�Q d Cy oZ o Sub-Total $ ZS/S� - 2 - Vr. i Description Unit Quantity pr-ze Cz,st I tam d Ri rap Channel CY g-s 40 _ 48 . Modified p - - — 49 . Intermediate Ripra p Channel CY 50 . Standard Riprap Channel CY — SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS 51. 21" PVC In Place SDR 35 LF -- 52 . 18" PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 15" PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 530 54 . 12" PVC In Place SDR 35 LF — 55. 10" PVC In place SDR 35 LF — 8" PVC In Place SDR 35 LF 17 7,S 7•?S l SOS 56. r 57. , 6" pVC In Place SDR 35 LF 74 /5.00 58 . 18" Ductile Iron In Place LF -- - LF 59 . 15" Ductile Iron In Place 600 12" Ductile Iron In Place LF 61. 10" Ductile Iron In Place LF 62. 8 " Ductile Iron In Place LF �s' 40 Ov 2(9cc In Place LF 63. 8" RCP Class 64 . 10" RCP Class In Place LF 65 . 12" RCP Class In Place LF 66 . 14" RCP Class In Place LF — 67 . 15" RCP Class In Place LF — 68 . 18" RCP Class In Place LF -- 69 . 21" RCP Class In Place LF In Place LF 70 . 24" RCP Class �� 71 . Sanitary Manhole EA /__7tp2 f��c 72 . Sanitary Manhole w/Drop Inlet EA ,Z (900 73 , Sanitary Manhole over 10 Ft. EA Sub-Total S 3 Uri i • �?:, CzSCti' � l � �r. � t . �r.titf STRUCTURES & MISC. ITEM 74 . Retaining Wall EA -- 75 . Fence (Type: ) EA —' 76 . Guide Rail (Type : ) LF -- 77 . End Anchorage (Type: ) EA — 78 . Guide Post EA 79 . Pavement Marking LF O 80 . Street Signs EA ,Z 1n zoo 81. Traffic Signs EA /� S"o G 82 . Street Lights EA 411 ,90 83 . Furnishing/Placing Topsoil SY 30 �� z ,SO 77 CEO 84 . Fertilizing, Seeding and SY q( Mulching Zo 85 . Liming TON p. 86 . Trees LS 2-3 10D Z3°O 87 . Maintenance/Protection LS of Traffic _ 88 . Construction Staking LF l you 89 . As-Builts LF / 5 ao Uc�c� 90 . Iron Pins EA SZ ,-v 91 . Concrete Monuments EA 44- zoo EROSION CONTROL Haybales/Silt Fencing L �� 92 . F 93 . Calcium for Dust Control TON — 94 . Sedimentation Ponds CY 95 . Maintenance of Erosion LS L, s. and Sedimentation Sub-Total $2(o 73G 4 Unit Item oescription Unit Quantity Price 96 . /Z 97 . Sub-Total Page 1 SuL-Total Page 2 Sub-Total Page 3 1 7 I Sub-Total Page 4 Sub-Total Pace 5 S goon 37 1-25~ 25% Contingencies x Sub-Total : $ q 2 3 3 TOTAL $ - �o�, l (� 5 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY CONS TRUC TION fa COw WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 ff BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 July 7, 1988 RECEIVED J U N 1 1 1988 Ms. Marcia Banach Planning Director SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPL Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Reference: Ridgefield, Section IV Dear Ms. Banach: I am requesting to bond the above referenced subdivision with a Letter of Credit. Would you please advise me as to the required amount for the Letter of Credit. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, J._�V CONSTRU TION COMPANY oseph P. LaCava pb THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... Jim at C ~ V/ Sau� ?d&U&Ot e � v s v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 :�tip�R.co��v AREA CODE 203/644-2511 July 22, 1988 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 RE: Preconstruction Meeting - Ridgefield IV Subdivision July 22, 1988 10:00 A.M. IN ATTENDANCE Name Company Telephone # M. Banach Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Gerald Lewis South Windsor Police 644-2551 Lester Braddock Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Karl Reichle Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Mel Stead Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Michael J. Gantick Town of South Windsor 644-2511 Minh V. Le SNET 725-4514 Joseph P. LaCava LaCava Construction 563-3711 George M. Ruff Yancey Company 633-0423 William McCleery Yancey Company 633-0423 The following is a brief summary of points discussed during the meeting. Public Works 1. All erosion and sedimentation control measures are to be in place prior to earth movinq op rations in each area and maintained clean d out during construction. 2. Three complete sets of approved/revised plans needed prior to start of construction. 3. The Public Works Department is to be notified forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of major construction work with inspections and testing per Developers Checklist required for the following: a) After road is staked out b) All drainage work c) Preparation of subgrade, compaction tests as required by the Town. d) Preparation of subbase, six (6) inch lifts e) Placement of bituminous concrete, 1 112 inch layers. 4. Certification of gravel used as subbase will be required by an approved testing company. 5. No subgrade formation/base in frozen ground/snow. Same for pipe/structure installation. 6. As built plans are to include horizontal and vertical location of all road underdrains/footing drains located by a certified land surveyor. 7. All topsoil stockpile areas to be protected (ringed with haybales or equal) . 8. All pipe and structures to be backfilled with free draining material, compacted in maximum one foot lifts with approved compaction equipment. 9. During construction of the road, a crushed stone tracking pad is to be installed and maintained to minimize tracking of dirt/gravel onto Krawski Drive. Calcium chloride is to be used for dust control as required. 10. Any problems and/or questions regarding construction of this project will be directed to Bill McCleery in the field. 11 . Road is to be paved with base coarse prior to issuance of Certificate of occupancy. No utility cuts after paving. 12. Developer/Contractor to submit mark up print of any buryhole locations. To be shown on as-builts. 13. All roadway filling to be done in accordance with Department of Transportation specifications. To be compacted in maximum lifts and tested as necessary. 14. Weekly job m etings on sit will be h ld on a day and time to be determined. 15. Forty-eight (48) hours notice needed for Certificate of Occupancy inspection. Two week review period (10 working days) needed for all individual site (lot) plans prior to issuance of building permit (may be longer if application is incomplete) . 16. Only approved copies of subdivision plans and lot site plans to be used. Any proposed changes are to be presented to Engineering/Plannng & Zoning prior to implementation. 17. Access off of Krawski Drive only. 18. All lots require footing drain. Mechanicals to be connected prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 19. No paving after October 15 without written approval from Director of Public Works. 20. Hours of operation 7:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. , no work on Sunday. Any pipe/structure work requires inspection prior to backfilling. 21 . Paving should be flush with MTT and CB. 22. During snowstorms all contractor vehicles should be off the road. 23. Job meeting at site for determining walkways to Open Space. Plan to be required. Planning Department 1 . Erosion and Sedimentation bond at $15, 000. needed before start of construction. 2. $30, 000. lot to lot grading bond to be submitted. 3. Close the gap in the sidewalk on Foster Street Wetlands 1 . Installation of paved roads prior to house building. W.P. C.A. 1 . Letter of approval to be filed with plans. SNET/NU 1 . Road crossing in approximately 90 days. Fire Marshall 1 . Blasting (if required) to be coordinated with the Fire Marshall. Police Department 1 . Require emergency numbers on Developer' s letter head. 2. Developer is responsible for purchase and installation of all signs. Must be in place before C.O. is issued. Houses to be numbered. 3. Street sign to be in place as soon as possible. 4. Street lighting may be needed at intersections. To be verified in the field and coordinated with CL&P. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning MAB/palm cc: A. Bowen Davies, Deputy Town Engineer John R. Collins, Chief Building Official Gerald Lewis Karl Reichle Mel Stead Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Minh V. Le, SNET George M. Ruff William McCleery Hal C1 i sby, CL&P Lester Braddock CA C r T-G apSau� ?d&"310t C � 4 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ~�soR•co�� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 August 2, 1988 Mr. Joseph La Cava La Cava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06074 Dear Sir : Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on July 26, 1988 , to set the subdivision bond for Ridgefiled IV at $464 ,000 . If you have any questions, please contact the PLnning Department at 644-2511 . Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr . Chairman ml cc: Michael Gantick, Director of Public Works Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Atty Peter Alter 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION a CO. WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 August 3, 1988 HAND DELIVEUTT:.t 3 1988 Ms. Marcia Banach 0 South Windsor Planning Director Planning & Zoning Commission Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Reference: Ridgefield, Section IV Dear Ms. Banach: Hand delivered with this letter are the mylars for filing and seven (7) sets of completed plans for the above referenced subdivision. Next week I will be delivering all required bonds, all deeds, the drainage assessment fee, and the liability insurance policy as required. I would hope to have everything ready for filing by the end of next week. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, V CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Joseph P. LaCava Enclosure pb M&IJ) ah,c. e-,v 4 f6t5 au� cU THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... THE ATNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY Lice On Civic Center Plaza Hard rd. Connecticut 06103 • LIFE&CASUALTY BOND NO. 7SB 100510639 BCA SUBDIVISION BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY hereinafter called Principal, as PRINCIPAL AND THE JETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY . COMPANY of the' City of Hartford of the County of Hartford in the State of Conn cticut as SURETY are held and firmly bound unto TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT in the sum of THIRTY THOUSAND AND NO/100ths ($_ 309000.00 -DOLLARS, to be paid to the Said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CT its successors and assigns, for which payment well and truly to be made, we b n ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission of th TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR,- CT for its approval,XXg GENERAL GRADING FOR LO_T-TO-LOT DRAINAGE FOR RIDGEFIELD Tv SUBnIVISION EELSOLIIH CT T ttnen R nGPFTFT n DETyp and WHEREAS, THE Planning and Zoning Commission of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT has approved said Plan on condition that the said Principal file with the- TOWN- _______OF SOUTH WINDSOR, _______CT a Bond in the amount of THIRTY TH OUSAND HOUSAND AND NO/100ths with Suret ($ 9 000 00 DOLLARS, y and in form approved by the Town.and with conditions satisfactoryto the Planning and Zoning Commission securingto the actual completion within TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR CT required by the Planning and Zoning Commissionof easamoreofk and installations fully appears on the application maps, plans and profiles filed by the Principal. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall on or before AUGUST 9, 1990 make and complete to the satisfaction of the - TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CT in accordance with its subdivision regulations and work and installations herein'referred to, this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals at Hartford, Connecticut, this 9th day of AUGUST 1988 ' • w. THE LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Pr nc pal ETN� CASUALTY T COMPANY BY: 4.//7Lemo from TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR TOWN HALL SOUTH WINDSOR.CONN.06074 TO Town Treasurer DATE 2 Town of South Windsor / 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor , Ct. 06074 L _J SUBJECT: Drainage Assessment Fees - Planning and Zoning Commission FOLD- a-U Enclosed is a check in the amount of $ %� ?mod which is the drainage assessment fee collected for Application No . , u Please deposit it in the proper account . Thank you. By If! u";LJ PLA ING & ZONING COMMISSION 51-57 C6 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTROL 024105 119 NUMBER 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 CHECK NUMBER 1107,732 THE CONNECTICUT BANK AND TRUST COMPANY WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT DATE 68/22/88 $1 250.00 PAY TO THE Town of South Windsor ORDER > H D SI NA RE OF �- /- AUTHORIZED SI&NKfURE 40119005 7 11: 156037 9118 'f T•♦ 66 Tallwood Drive SouLil `,v;,i-lsc;r November 30, 1988 South Windsor, CT 060anning & Zoning Commission IRS Consultants, Inc. 205 Lincolndale Drive Waterbury, CT 06704 Dear Sirs: In response to your letter dated Navember 28, 1988, we agree to permit an inspection of our home at 66 Tallwood Drive prior to blasting that is expected to occur in connection with the construction that is being done by the LaCava Canstru,ction Ca q)any on the property adjoining ours. I will be interested to see how you are able to docent the prior condition of the basement walls and foundation of my house when about one half of the walls are behind playroom walls. Of more concern to me is the damage that may occur to my ingrvund swimming pool as a result of the blasting. There were no leaks in the pool when I closed it in the fall, and any damage that may result from the blasting will probably not be discovered prior to late spring when the pool is reopened. I hope that no damage will occur during this blasting procedure, but if it does, I expect that the L3Cava Construction Cag3any will bear the expense of the rep;rs. Since the Town of South Windsor issues the permits that allow this activity to proceed, and since it is my understanding that a precondition for issuing such permits is the filing of a performance bond, or some other guarantee of performance, by copy of this letter I am asking the 'Down of South Windsor Planning and Zoning ColtQnission to not release the performance bond obtained by LaCava Construction until I have had reasonable opportunity to diet ermine whether latent damage has occurred to my pool. This determination will probably not be possible until the end of June 1989. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Walter D. Mawhinney WLM:RB cc: LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Cr 06109 . Town of South Windsor Planning & Zoning C=imission 1540'Sullivan Ave South Windsor, Cr 06074 A I.J ` -"Rrip1 /yCONS TRUC TION 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY " C06 WETHERSFIELD1 CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 May 30, 1989 Mr. Michael Gantick Director of Public Works Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 Reference: Ridgefield, Section IV Dear Mr. Gantick: I am requesting a bond reduction on the above referenced subdiviaiQn Cam also requesting the method of bonding be changed rom the Letter of Credit to a surety bond. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Joseph P. LaCava pb lop WE�vE M � THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... w N a t4 Toulgn Ole Sau� a � _ �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 ����soR•co-'o AREA CODE 203/644-2511 June 2, 1989 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 RE: Ridgefield Subdivision, Section IV Dear Mr. LaCava: 1 have been asked to respond to your bond reduction request of May 30, 1989 for Ridgefield Subdivision. The method used to establish the bonding amount is taken from your engineers quantity estimate using our appropriate dollar amounts . To effectively establish the current values for the reduction, it would require similar estimate from your engineer , taken from a progress as-built drawing showing all the improvements together with the site change as approved" , as a guide. When this information is received, we will be able to review your request and make our recommendations. Very truly yours, /3a A. Bowen Davies Deputy Town Engineer ABD/jsv cc: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning File Clos e' JL,71�01 ctrlc.l B� DATE S,_,6.'E�;T ' ,�LI> O/ti/� SHEET NO � OF � HKD By DATE RkQ46r-JCL D Delve .(]B NO CltOss �� fort 5 CD 1 O i o -O i I I I � o � � I I I � - I 03 i 1 o I I i I � i N u' I 4 , � I � i I I I � 1 0 ti � C r a I O 0 I 4Qb � � 0 � 0l O o 0 clo,C , cn cn andN1111cr)nc 1 . C. BY DATE I7�8� SUBJECT 9�r�4,t��,G4,v s�cT � SHEET NC) � r)F CHKD BY DATE y ummorWlnd JOB NO rQ�S SeGT&o P J � 6 I I , { I I N I 0 1 i 1 � I ' 1 •+ A I Q 1 V1 !1 � I � � 1 { I 1 I I N I + O � � 1 o � ' a O O a o CA aps ?d&U&Gt �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 ��psoR•co.? AREA CODE 203/644-2511 June 28, 1989 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06074 Dear Sir: Are RE: Letter of Credit for Ridgefield IV The Planning and Zoning Commission is holding a Letter of Credit drawn on Connecticut National Bank in connection with the above matter. The Letter of Credit is in the amount of $460,000 and will expire on 8/07/89 . In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in leiu of a surety bond, we must have an amendment to the Letter of Credit extending the term for a one year period well in advance of the expiration date. Will you please forward us the amendment promptly. Very Truly Yours, Raymond J. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman, Planning and Zoning ml CC: PZC File Marcia Banach, Director-.of Planning �0M Gory K. Tyler Chief of Police Po lice Services RECEIVED JUL is Ms SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPL July 12, 1989 Joseph P. LaCava LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava, Re: Signing-of Ridge field subdivision IV South Windsor, Conn u Install Stop Signs (2B-4) R1-1 at the following locations: 1.Install stop sign at the intersection of Ridgefield Drive /Krawski Drive on the east side of Krawski Drive. 2.Install stop sign at the intersection of Summerwind/Ridgefield Drive on the east side of Summerwind. 3.Install stop sign at the intersection of Summerwind/Krawski Drive on the west side of Summerwind. Locate sign on attached map- red dot. Install Speed Limit Sign 25MPH R2-1 at the following locations: 1.Install speed limit sign 25MPH on Ridgefield Drive(south side of street) 100 feet east of Krawski Drive. 2. Install speed limit sign 25MPH on Summerwind(east side of street) 75 feet north of Krawski Drive. Locate signs on attached map- blue dot. Pavement Markings ( Stop Bars) Shall be painted at all stop sign placements. If you have any questions, please call at your convenience. Very truly yours, Gary K. Tyler Chief of Police By: Sergeant Thomas C. Hart #103 cc: Marsha Banach Town PLanner Traffic Services 11 151 Sand Hill Road South Windsor, Connecticut106074 • (203) 644-2551 47 48 49 50 51 52 46 53 RIDGEFIELD • 54 p 56 69 68 62 70 61 • 57 64 60 67 p 59 p = 58 p 66 � 65 W J N � 38 KRAWSKI DRIVE RIDGEFIELD re y v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 sOR-co��'v AREA CODE 203/644-2511 July 13, 1989 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06074 Dear Sir: RE: Ridgefield IV Subdivision Bond Reduction At the July 11, 1989 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission they reduced the bond the Town is holding in connection with the above referenced subdivision from $460,000 to $150,000 - In accordance with our policy for accepting Letters of Credit in leiu of a surety bond, please send us an amendment to the Letter of Credit extending the term for a one year period. Very Truly Yours, Raymond F. Hallowell, Jr. Chairman, Planning and Zoning ml CC: ZC File Marcia Banach, Director of Planning M ~ t,< 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 4'~�SOR-CO N�� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 ,February 8, 1990 Mr. Joseph P. LaCava LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: re: Substitution of Surety Bond for Letter of Credit This is to confirm that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on January 23, 1990 to approve your January 4, 1990 request to substitute a surety bond for an expiring letter of credit on Beechwood Farms Section II. Very truly yours, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION l ' Louise C. Evans Chairman •rt TRUCW185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY ETHERSFIELD CONNECTICUT 6109 TI 0, BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 June 19, 1990 RECEIVED JUN 22 1990 A WIRMOR Pmone DUL Ms. Marcia Banach Planning Director Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 RE: Ridgefield, Section IV Dear Ms. Banach: You are currently holding a Letter of Credit for $150, 000. 00 from Connecticut National Bank to guarantee completion of the above referenced subdivision. We are requesting permission to replace that Letter of Credit with a surety bond from Aetna Life and Casualty. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very truly yours, VA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Joseph P. LaCava pb THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ....C�c . THE ATHA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY On Civic Center Plaza Hartford. Connecticut 06103 • LIFE&CASUALTY SUBDIVISION BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE -LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY her inafter called Principal, as PRINCIPAL AND THE JETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY of the' City of Hartford of the County of Hartford in the State of Connecticut as SURETY are held and firmly bound unto TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR in the sum of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND 00/10 -------------------- ($ 150,000.00---) ,DOLLARS, to be paid to the Said TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR its successors and assigns, for which payment well and truly to be made, we-71"niff ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR for its approval, XX COMPLETION OF RIDGEFIELD SECTIO and WHEREAS, THE Planning and Zoning Commission of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR has approved said Plan on condition that the said Principal file wit h the TOWN OF. SOUTH WINDSOR a Bond in the amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND 00/100ths-------------------------------_( ------ DOLLARS, with Surety and in form approved by the Town.and with conditions satisfactory to the Planning and Zoning Commission securing to the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR actual completion within TOWN OF SOUTH of certain work and installations required by the Planning and n Commission as more fully appears on the application maps, plans and profiles filed by the Principal. . NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall on or before 19 92 make and complete to the satisfaction of the - TOWN OF SOOT WINUSUR ' in accordance with its subdivision regulations and work and installations herein . referred to, this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in' full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals at Hartford, Connecticut, this JUNE 199 1990 THE LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY incipal BY: - HE A CASUA Y A U COMPANY BY. W� 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY N lR lI WETHERSFIELD CONNECTICUT 06109 a , BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 July 11, 1990 RECEIVED JUL 18 19W CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEFT. Ms. Marcia Banach Planning Director Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 RE: Ridgefield Section IV Dear Ms. Banach: On June 19, I wrote to you requesting permission to substitute the expiring Letter of Credit with a Surety Bond from Aetna Life and Casualty. I was under the impression from past experience that such sub- stitution was a routine matter. Therefore, I find myself in the embarrassing position of having already purchased a Surety Bond to replace the Letter of Credit. You will find the Surety Bond enclosed. Earlier in the year a similar substitution was made on our Beech- wood Farms Section II Subdivision (see enclosed letter) . We have already paid a non-refundable premium for the Surety Bond Your consideration in approving this substitution will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, YAV CONSTRUCTION COMPANY i t oseph P. LaCava Enclosure cc: Ms. Michele R. Lipe Assistant Planner/Analyst THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... r 7-0 04e ?d&&'A0t u s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 4�'►'� .Cpt��� AREA CODE 203/644-2511 July 31, 1990 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Weth rsfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: RE: Ridgefield IV Subdivision Bond Please be advised that at the July 24, 1990 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission, they voted to accept the Aetna Life & Casualty Surety Bond submitted for $150,000 for the completion of subdivision improvements in the Ridgefield IV Subdivision. This surety bond was effective on June 19, 1990 . I have enclosed the original Letter of Credit from Connecticut National Bank with the amendments. If we can be of further assistance, please call. Very Truly Yours, Planning & Zoning Commission Louise C. Evans Chairman THE /ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY One Civic Cantor Plaza Lime Marti rd. Connecticut 06103 •LIFE&CASUALTY 007 SB 100684957 BCA SUBDIVISION BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY hereinafter called Principal, as PRINCIPAL AND THE IETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY of thw City of Hartford of the County of Hartford in the State of Connecticut as SURETY are held and firmly bound unto TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR in the sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND AND 00/100ths--------- ($15,000.00 DOLLARS, to be paid to the Said TOWN OF SQUIH WINDSOR its successors and assigns, for which payment well and truly to be made, we b n ours lves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, firmly by these presents. : WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR for its approval, 14X FOR COMPLETION OF _ RID E I LD AP DATED 2/25j911 L• 20 & 21 KRAWSKI and WHEREAS, THE Planning and Zoning Commission of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR has approved said Plan on condition that the said Principal file with the TOWN OF• SQUIH WINDSOR a Bond in the amount of FIFTEEN THOUSAND AND 00/100ths --------------------------------------------- ($ 15.�000.00----- DOLLARS, with Suretyand in form approved by the Town.and with conditions satisfactory to the Planning and Zoning Commission securing to the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR actual completion within 2 YEARS of certain work and installations required by the Planning and Zoning Commission as more fully appears on the application maps, plans and profiles filed by the Principal. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall on or before MARCH 5, 1993 make and complete to the satisfaction of the - TOWN OF 9OUTH WINDSOR in accordance with its subdivision regulations and work and installations herein r ferred to, this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals at Hartford, Connecticut, this 5th DAY OF MARCH, 1991 , THE LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Principa • .� THE At" TNA CA AND ETY COMPANY ' BY ttor EOM N t,t y . wc'` 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 R•C0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511 December 10, 1991 Joe La Ca va La Cava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: Re: Application #86-533, Ridgefield At the December 9, 1991 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved a three year extension of Application #86-533 with all original and standard conditions. Application #86-533 expires on February 5, 1995. Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. Warren, Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission EAW/pmm cc: Director of Planning Planning & Zoning Commission Town Engineer wN sf,(� C � Ole Saam ?P&U&Ot � U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 O AREA CODE 203 644-2511 ,��SOR•C November 9, 1993 Joseph P. LaCava La Cava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. La Cava: Re: Application #86-533, Ridgefield, Section ID At the November 8, 1993 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved a five year extension of Application #86-533 with all original and standard conditions. Application #86-533 expires on February 4, 1999. Very truly yours, Eliza eth A. Warren, Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission EAW/pmm Enclosure (approval letter dated 2/23188) cc: Planning & Zoning Commission Town Engineer .� O � ~ � �� �ICE/ • c � x 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203 644- 11 SOR•CO�� F E46 ebruary 23 , 1988 LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield , CT. 06109 Gentlemen : RE: Application #533 At the February 22 , 1988 meeting the South Windsor Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission approved with conditions Application #533 . Storm water drainage will be discharged into existing pond situated in Town—owned Open Space easterly of the proposed subdivision . Construction activity will involve installation of necessary drainage facilities ; drainage will be ongoing . This is shown on plans prepared by Close , Jensen and Miller, dated December, 1987 consisting of eleven pages . The following conditions must be adhered to for this permit to be valid . 1. We recommend a bond in the amount of $15, 000. be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with erosion & sediment control mireasures . 2 . Three (3) blueprint copies of the approved map with all modifications must be submitted to the IWA/CC within 65 days for review. - 3. Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the Town Engineer . 4. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of South Windsor against any liability which might result from the proposed operation and/or use . 5. Installation of a paved road before construction commences. 6. It was indicated at the meeting that parcels . 90 and 92 would be deeded to the town . It was recommended that Planning and Zoning accept them as open space. 7. The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on February 23, 1989 . Very truly yours, John M. Moran , Jj! Chairman Inland Wetlands Agency/ Conservation Commission JMM,Jr . /pmm cc : A .B. Davies , Deputy Town Engineer Marcia Banach, Director of Planning Michael Gantick , Director of Public Works Thomas D°Auria , Building Official Raymond Hallowell , Chairman PZC Close , Jensen & Miller F0_6 (.1 /o 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION w CO. WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 April 25, 1995 D b Mr. Russell G. Levack APR 27 1995 Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission South Town of South Windsor wlndsOr Planning 1540 Sullivan Avenue ng & Zoning Commissio South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 A RE: Ridgefield Section IV Dear Mr. Levack: We are requesting an extension of the time to complete the work in connection with the above referenced subdivision. The remaining work consists of the top course on the road- way and a portion of the sidewalk. Although we anticipate having this work completed by the Fall of this year, we are requesting the full 3-year ex- tension that you are permitted to grant by Statute. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, 70sep VA CONSTR CTION COMPANY h P. LaCava pb THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ... MAY 10 19% ASSISTANT TOWN CLE LEGAL NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, MAY 13, 1995 SOUTH WINDSOR - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION At its May 9, 1995 Regular Meeting, the Commission voted to take the following actions: 1. Approve a three (3) year extension for Appl #9 6P, Ridgefield Section IV 2. Approve the settings/reductions/callings of certain bonds Russell G. Levack, Chairman .`O�N SEA a * r T'OW 0� V&&441at z 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 ` AREA CODE 203/644-2511 SOR•CO�� May 15, 1995 Joseph P. LaCava Lacava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: ,gam 67 Re: Appl #9',%06P - Ridgefield Section IV Subdivision We are pleased to advise you that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted on May 9, 1995 to approve with modifications the above-referenced application for an extension of subdivision for eighteen lots on property located on Ridgefield Drive as shown on plans prepared by Close, Jensen & Miller revised through June 7, 1988, Project No. 3522, and with the following modifications: 1. The new expiration date,is January 22, 1999. 2. The bond amount must be re-established using currents costs, and if necessary, existing subdivision surety must be supplemented. 3. All original approval conditions remain in effect. A new black and white transparent mylar of sheet#2, together with 3 blueprint copies, must be submitted to this Commission within 30 days to be stamped and signed. The letter of approval of this Commission must be reproduced on the mylars. After the mylars have been signed by the Commission, they will be returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk. After filing these plans, a copy of the receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. Very truly yours, PLANNING & ZONING COMNIISSION Russell G. Levack, Chairman RGL/pmm cc: Chief Building Official Town Engineer Superintendent of Pollution Control Fire Marshal �a.c� a CONS TRUCTION 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY C08 WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (203) 563-3711 T south Ms. Marcia Banach Q�annin� Planning Director Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 RE: Ridgefield Section IV Subdivision #90-66P Dear Ms. Banach: Enclosed is the Bond Estimate Form for the above referenced project. The current Bond is in the amount of $150, 000. Therefore, we are requesting a reduction in the amount of $69, 000, leaving a Bond in the amount of $81, 000. Also could you please advise me when the new mylars have been signed by the Commission so I may proceed with their filing. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, 0 C VA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ?Joseph P. LaCava Enclosure pb THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ....oorc . TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR 'PROIECT:Ridgefield IV STREET:Ridgefield Dr & Summer— BOND ESTIMATE FORM P&Z I.D.: 90-66P wind ENGINEER:C lose,,Jensen & Miller 1995 CALENDAR YEAR DATE: May , Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantity Price cost No. 1 No. 2 1. Clearing & Grubbing. 2. Strip &Stockpile To it CY 2.00 3. Earth Excavation (Excluding Roadway &Trench) 10.0 4. Roadway vati 12.00 5. Earth Trench Exc. 0-4 CY 10.00 6. Earth Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 12.00 7. Earth Trench Ex -1 Trench8. Earth 9. Roadway Exc. (Rock) •-k Trench -4 hock Trench Exc. 0-10 CY 75.00 12. Rock Trench Exc. 0-15 100.00 13. Rock Trench Exc, 0-20 CY 150.00 14 Formation 15, Subbase Gravel 16. Processed Ag=gate TONS1 .00 17. Common Borrow CY 10.00 18. Gravel Borrow 19. " Bit. Concrete TONS 50-00 20. " Bit. Concrete 330 18,15 0 (Class 11) TONS 55.00 *varies Page 1 Sub-Total$ 18,15 0 BOND ESTIMATE FORM _ Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 21. " As halt Lip CurbingLF 3.00 22. Road Widening Complete SY 50. 0 1 �ZOd 23. Conc Sidewalk 4' Wide I LF 30.00 � _ STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 24. 60" RCP Class IV In Place LF 130.00 25. 54" RCP Class IV In Place LF 100.00 2 . 4 " R P CI&v IV In Place 75.00 27. 4 " RCP ClassIV In Place LF 65.00 28. " RCP ClassIV In Place LF 60.0 29. " RCP Class IV In Place F 50.00 30. 24" RCP Class IV In Place F 42.00 1. 1 " R P Class IV In Place LF 35.00 2. 1 P Class IV In Place LF 30.00 POLYETHYLENE PIPE 34. " AD -N-12 or Eaal 21.00 35. 0" -N-12 or Equal 22.50 36. 12" ADS-N-12 or F4ual 24.00 7. 1 " ADS-N-12 2[F4Hal 2. 0 38. 1 " N-12 UNDERDRAINS 9. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF 1500 ' 40. " PVC DR 35 In Place LF 20.00 RIPRAP 41. Modified Ri2= CY 45.00 ZDO Page 2. Sub-Total$ ��0 BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Desaiption Unit Quantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 42. —Intermediate 4 5.00 4 —Standard Ri 45.00 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 44. T " " Catch Basin FA 1500.00 45. T " Double rat EA 200 0 46. TyM "C-L" Catch Basin EA 1500.00 47. —Mmihole EA 1 500.00 48. Marihole w Inlet EA 2500.00 49. Manhole v Ten Feet EA 2000.00 50. Head—wall 51. 1 EA 2, x Culvert x LF 53. 1 EA 45000 54, N Flared End IRA 500.00 55. 24" Flared End FA 550, 0 56. N Flared 7. 10' Wide 9. Gravel Access 60. Reset M H SANITARY SEWER COMFONENT� 1 1 " PVC PI40.00 62, 1 Place 63, N 64, " PVC DR * varies Page 3. Sub-Total$ 0 BOND ESTIMATE Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description UnitQuantity_ Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES 65. SanitmaManhole 1500.00 66. Sanitary Manhole w/Drop Inlet EA 1 2500.00 67. Sanitary Manhole over 10 FT. EA 2000.0 68. STRUCTURES& MISC. ITEMS 70, Retaining Wall LF 71. Fence 72, Guide Rail * 73. End Anchorage EA 74. Guide Post EA 100.00 75, Pavement ! 30 1.50 �-� 76, Street Si9WZ' 75,00 7 . Traffic i 5 75.00 375 78. Sawt Lights EA 7 1000,00 7,000 79. Furnishing !� 3 70 80, Fertilizing. Seeding Sy 1ST 0 3 7.� and Mulching 2.50 l. Trees EA SO' ZZS'� $2. Maintenanw Pmtection LS of Traffic * varies -7 r 470 Page 4. Sub-Total$ 7,e� BOND ESTIMATE FORM Bond Bond Unit Reduction Reduction Item Description Unit Ouantity Price Cost No. 1 No. 2 84. -Builts LS 3 000 8 . iron Pins EA 18 100. 0 1 f 8 0 0 6. Concrete MonumentS EA 24 250.00 61000 7. Driveway-Bit. Conc. SY 20.00 8. 89. 90. Sub-Total $ 10, 8 0 0 Sub-Total Page 1 $ 18,15 0 Sub-Total Page 2$ , 4o,ZO v Sub-Total Page 3$ 0 Sub-Total Page 4$ 4,37,5-17470 4 Sub-Total Page 5$ 10, 800 Sub-Total$ goo/to ZO Z I&iS'Sr 2501b Contingencies x Sub-Total: $ TOTAL$ 108'4Z7J00" e !o% ogl4 4�o00 S� IM19.E * varies Page 5. /ve11er/80NDESTMRM1fbrm95 MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of PI F FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engineer DATE: July 19, 1995 RE: RIDGEFIELD IV SUBDIVISION - 90-66P We have reviewed the bond estimate for Ridgefield IV and have made some modifications. We recommend that the bond be set at $150,000.00 Attached for your records is a copy of the bond estimate. JCl/j sv WN Sf, C Tvwn 014Cs ?40&"�at . U s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE . SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074 AREA CODE 203 644-2511 SOR•COS / July 26, 1995 Joseph Lacava Lacava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. Lacava: V61 Re: Application #99�1 6P, Ridgefield Estates Section IV Subdivision Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on July 25, 1995 to establish a bond in the amount of$150,000 for the subject application. A bond or letter of credit in this amount must be posted prior to the filing of the mylar in the Town Clerk's office. Very truly yours, PLA17NING & ZONING COMMISSION sell G. Levack Chairman RGL/pmm cc: Town Engineer 4 TowN OF SOUTH WINDSOR MEMO To: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer From: Mel Stead, Street Superintendent y►'t,� Subject: .Ridgefield Drive and Summerwind Drive Date: February 28, 1997 The pavement on Ridgefield Drive and Summerwind Drive is in very poor shape. It looks like only binder on Ridgefield Drive from Files Way east to the cul-de-sac and on all of Summerwind. This pavement will not stand up for very long if only a 1" - 1 '/2" surface course is put on it before acceptance. We should be laying the groundwork for remedial work to ensure the Town is given a good product. I think we should be looking at crack sealing, some cut and patch, and a 2" overlay. MCS/gh R/rS/9 7 t: TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR MEMO DATE: September 16, 1997 TO: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer FROM: Mel Stead Superintendent of Streets SUBJECT: Ridgefield Drive and Summerwind Drive A revisit to Ridgefield Drive yesterday, September 15, 1997, revealed a pavement in failure. '1,umerous cracks exist and at least one pothole. I checked my files to see if there was any information concerning this subdivision. What I found was a 1992 list of streets accepted by the Town Council that Bo put together. Ridgefield appears on that list as being accepted 11/6/89. I do not recall that the complete street was accepted. Please determine what parts have been accepted. We must determine what part of Ridgefield and Summerwind still belong to the contractor. I believe their 7-year construction period is over. Something more than an overlay must be done before we accept these roads. MCS/gh S0%4 S�, 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074 4'tGS PR-Cw`� AREA CODE 860/644-2511 September 25, 1997 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 RE: FARMBROOK SUBDIVISION RIDGEFIELD DRIVE & SUMMERWIND DRIVE Dear Mr. LaCava: An inspection of the Farm Brook Subdivision has shown that the shims around the sanitary manhole on Scott Drive and around the catchbasin in front of lot #6 have been damaged and must be replaced. It was also noted that numerous catch basin tops and manhole frames exhibit severe damage and should be replaced prior to final paving. The shims should be replaced by October 15, 1997. An inspection of Summerwind Drive and Ridgefield Drive revealed a pavement in failure. The portion of Ridgefield drive that has not been accepted by the Town and Summerwind drive will require extensive reconstruction before the Town can accept them. I believe that a meeting at Summerwind Drive should be held so we can all agree on the measures to be taken and the timeframe for the repairs. Please call me to set up the meeting as soon as possible. kyou s,zzeneer JCl/jsv cc: , Melvin C. Stead Jr. Supt. of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer CONSTRUCTION CO. 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY UiWETHERSFIELD CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (860)563-3711 September 29, 1997 Mr. Jerry Iazzetta, P.E. Town Engineer Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 RE: ,-yFarm Brook and Ridgefield Subdivisions Dear Mr. Iazzetta: We plan on completing the public improvements on the above referenced subdivisions as follows : Ridgefield June 1998 Farm Brook September 1998 Per our discussion on the phone today, I will call you well in advance of those dates to meet with you at the site and discuss the concerns as outlined in your letter dated Sept- ember 25, 1997 . You can expect our full cooperation. Very truly yours, AV NST UCTI N COMPANY J seph P. LaCava cc : Mr. Bill McCleery Yancey Corporation Mr. Brian Beechinor Director of Construction 1 2 LaCava Construction Company RECEIVED a S E P 3 0 1997 N ,.. soun�w�aosoR ass.oar. w THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... I 5 RECEIVED MEMORANDUM uC l 3 1997 DATE: October 2, 1997 TO: Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer '1M/-,L SOUTN WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT. FROM: Mel Stead, Supt. of Streets I received a copy of Joe LaCava's letter to you dated September 1997. Joe indicates that he plans to complete public improvements on Ridgefield in June of 1998. He also states he will call well in advance of that date to meet with you at the site and discuss concerns outlined in your letter dated September 25, 1997. A review of my files indicates that there were residents living on Ridgefield in November of 1987. This may mean that the binder course could have been down for nearly 10 years. A meeting and inspection should be set up as soon as possible to review the existing conditions and entertain proposals from the developer as to how he will put this road system into acceptable condition for town acceptance when the public improvements are completed. I suggest that we also review the conditions of approval, the approval date, and all bonds and discuss the situation with Marcia and Mike before we set up a meeting with the developer. MC S/gh cc: Mike Gantick Marcia Banach✓ J TZ c 6j 0 TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR STAFF SITE CHANGE FOR SITE & SUBDIVISION GENERAL: CHANGE ORDER CONTACT PERSON bil a+r, Pc �; ,a , r Phone No. 5 (o Address k9-S- Is•,t45 . 0111C<<.�c �.�k Lc�� I�e",i -P;e C-'t Site Name -'<<�t -��;Q�L S`�, k•� sr�.� P&Z No. Owner (�,r, Ca�e't �d,�s `�rL.,C- ;Gri ( Phone No. �'� --37// Contractor f l�roS rL NC i-��ksc, -{ `�`�- Signature of Owner Date: k L� l `1'7 Signature of Design Engr. Date: CHANGE: (Describe location and nature of change. Include Four (4 ) copies of plan/profile of Change. ) CVl 4 t c� r v ecr c - r- k eL (mac-�cn ,1c 4e Reason for Change: (Why is change required)eci ff et' W t t c, -t cce f CC �e ••��� r r� �(•C C �(a --Cd-o APPROVALS: (As Required) / Dir.. Of Planning Date: Town Engineer Date: Dir. of Public 44 s Date: Other: Date: STAFF COMMENTS: 8 RErFAD �O O 1�+1 Z White - Town Engineer Yellow - Applicant Pink - Director of Planning Goldenrod - Engineering Department Ja�V4L4n trus mpvvf�od I Pos P-101VI-74 l twK�+1 Q I"��P°N :(� nuku p�yntty(pt�(� �pala��JWoJ ,0 rj outtowb) II 4Srd jo:U.0110,es ssojj` • __ . II DECK 40.3' b 2 STORY FRAM 22.V LOT 68 a FF=274.3 ISON/F LACAVA 1 °= FL•264.5t + J CONSTRUCTION CO. \ W� PoRO+ 0 22.6' 23 \ — — \ 0 6-L ; \ OUND ELECTRIC \ Ft-263.00 \ \ \ \ a ->< cr FOOTING DRAIN v RA L NIN(�, 100 it e I `O 110.00 \ 10' C.L.&P. EASEMENT \S2O'40 22 SAN. MH TF=274.66 WATER MAIN rti F1=267.80 ROADWAY ELEV. 269.Of NOTE: A LIVE SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL. THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARE ON THE BASIS OF A LIMITED INVE, OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. THE WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A OR OMISSIONS PERTAINING TO SUI M. NOWELL, CONDITIONS INCORPORATED INTO 1 SURANCE COMPANY, ABSOLUTELY NO DIGGING SHOULD �ESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS WITHOUT FIRST ACCURATELY LOCAL FACILITIES. EEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZONING DATA -20 OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT * OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION AA- a-,@ e_LIM ►iwncc Oki Tur c-`TwTC ^C' +1 .ore �' ITc`If'1[- nr 1/'►n vVAO C 'LaCAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANI 185 SILAS DEANE HIG�Joyy WLTHER,SFIF-LD. WhIP4.. §?5J@j EGG � �- as � _�.�� .�_. �___.. _nb..� _�_. �ti��s� Frr��,� a66 MAR-le-1995 10:A9 _ . . . . ,,•„ N.E. SILICA @60 282 9^085 P.02i0 5 Subvonurittee C 15.03 Tuk coup C 1 s.o3.a b ITEM Ori$inaong Meeting Date: %/96 A,dtpt the follawitIg te_w st"dard(or Se.Vfm rtlk [AclWeing Wa!! Units: D AAFT -7 Juno 1996 f rMl ftwow b pit of Me ASIM xwft*"em a441s for AIM cawifttow w t wy. R"I flat VC t+ipst>El d or'qu"w4 orgr+ild, to w1w1k at i►,ply 144W 0 ASTbt cla mk w does#%apt with"aPPRrM of OK gNk%=w1 Of Shc ROf IM"11810112AMAd00 K 00 . flwoog AR"Soddy, ASTM Dasignadm-C XX v XX StandA rd SpWifl adon for .Sr4WWAL Rr, NINQ WALL UNITS 1. Savo 1.1 JUS gpeei&40 covets $*$M W re%jaing Wdl anlca of concwt;, tnocfslw made hotri pottlaod ceftne, WVW, and suitabia ndvoWaspnatts with or wilhout the Mine of Ot er witor is. 7be unim am iata*d for use In the consuvctiun of n0dvioss 90PNOW reeslft wstlb. 142 It* vsim wited In inch-pound units MV to be MPrded As the "tandW. 'ire vAlUeS SWIG in PAteadwit am fQs iaftmwas only. �, d Aacuraan� 2.3 ASTM S"d &. C 33 Spain vjd'qst fix AWO" C 140 Methods of Utong nd Testing Coaucrere Masanry Units C ISO Spawcaft for Potlad Comet C 331 Speefficafta for LigbMight AgPostes for Conorcte Mayo y Units C$931C.395 M Spet;illaft for Blended HydraWic CoMeAra C 619 Sprrifiawou for Fly Asti sad Is*or Calcined NatuW Pamlaji for VMo as a Mend Admiawe in Pealed Con mt C t+e C 989 Spft1ftW= for Orco d Gvxm4 ed Blast Futn= Sias for Use in Concrete ad C1IS7fCl 157M Perfatmwx Spdcifiq 1" flex Sl�rit9cd 1i�rtiraul.�Cex+, ►t C 1262 Erra,luMlog the -Thaw DMmboity of Manufactured Comae MssQw Units rod pow"Co=Cw Vohs. 3. Mt►tess 3.1 CtwndOous< Mate iAU - Mated94 shall conform to the following applicable Ipeeifcadoo •. 3.1,1 PWJtnd Ctta nts-SP660800ft C 1%, 3.1.2 MWIed Pottiad Content • Poniard Ca=t confo Wag to SPeciftwiotl C 150. midifim as wows'. err aest xt g sa ants' ev souse as woe a eNo w9wMiteam• L 1� A . MAR - ::� 3 - 9 $ M O N 1 0 = 0 9 • E A H L E R BROTHERS P . 02 ___ __ __ + _... ....... • P1AR-4 6-1858 10 51 N.E. SILICA 860 282 9885 P.05/05 BALLOT (Tr4MS SUbcommitict C 15.03 AT1J4HMCNV 2 Task Group C t S•03.01 oliginetina Mpg Nto. 06196 lot and =ted of the expeasc of the tnanufscturer. If the iecond sat�p c the purchaser from the Mradoed ectcd. raUs to cgntol�m to the spccifl'4 m4U1;cMcers.the entirt lot shall be pI 9. Keywords ddous m�rials9 compeessir c st aSth, Goc;Mtc tri"oncy units 9.1 Abl�►�on. 16SMSAW, t dimensions.durability,wei&c1%11&rd01' Rationale: • is with the requuclacaa of this stud 1tt� been suceesifullY ScgmcAtaal retu�nlos will utt:u ood kdd orrn&pm Se�ntld rdsil�g wratl units curmatly Wag used and have dun9estratc�d 8 � e with this stsndud so that both tht"hAW supplied to the Ma*d shoa be Ad ode rig of tha expacmd level 4f per{aRmutcC Of the Md t�C sypp�er have the A�lsut'� WA product. Wit IWM pap 4 of 4 • . �14i .......... . ..-. -r... .................r----r..-. .... ..... .... .... .-..a-- MAR-18-199S 10:49 N.E. SILICA 860 282 98SS P.03/05 IIALLOT ITEMS -0*ACHMCNT P. S�1 otritoittce C 15,03 TAsk ONO C IS-C'3-01 OrtginaAng Meeting Dstc: 06196 • tone,w(ch� }mucttt 8596 C�Giucu C�tbot:a1:c t ecC0ajt c��f 3.1.2.1 Limestone • Uv* stalll be pctmttted t4 be added to the cetctent. pzovidcd these ,re�uirtznetres of Sp cc s 150 as rno� led=M&C (1)wmitativa on 10010blo Rasiduc• i,S V.�uot P 't�2246 m•�• t21 L.ia►a Qn�t C�ati'rtnt of M (3)j:&mjtetinn on foss of 16ditxo t; atents•S�eciff catsotl C S951C59SM or C Z 1371C t 137bt. 3.1,3 alendad C 3.1.4 Pvml=s.Sper,.fcatioa C 61a. ft 3.1.s Blast F�t cx Slag o-SPec'figsdo C 9$ flowing s cifr�cioas, txcrpc tMac 3.2 AUMPW4 , Agg�g i shall cogl'orcri to this f grading requimmOts shall ttot Aessfirity applx'stion C 33. .. 3.2.t NOMAI Weight A 8P 11,Isms $ f c .2 Li Nweight A8�8�ta'Spiticaligo C 33 LR i �. idtegtf! WA tat Mpeilc % 3. 8 rents.C0locing p B P ;a 3.3 Othct C0U$titwents- A►r a n'ng B be • r eos�titwea=s shill be pRCvlou$ly tsubtished as�suitAbla fermi l"taly gr;lad silsea. P44 otht ble ASTIR St"tttduds or* welt Mtal muir ins wall o sNW e00f0m t° ' h s o f ,e tl�ntat re 6 test Qt cxMic,"M to be ant detri�i to tt dWabt ry shown by unite oc ry�►wi�t custonw*and in s [ttal ttotuua6 wou consuucnc�n. at 4. Physic8l R*qu ncs t tha wodc sica c� units shall conform to the phyefal 4.1 At tha OW Of del;vtry A with y on7.2- ploMis of Tibk 1 when t�wd in wen dwac T j $hest t�i SW 60 Rego Leffi'ftu M tun W%Wr Mlnirnua�Regss# d Absotr4an Requests Not A Ib►R'(trim') pit te%3 yVlsiBht Classi#'Ics�� ChreVI.Dry amity of C00csete Normm! ' �tlivid� �g�Nvel�t Medium Weight Wei he AWM8a Of Unit Len th" 105(1662)to leas :l�.S(o 3 uldts t�S 1td82) than 125(2M) r Mora l B(28a) IS.t(241D) 13 (2OB) 30M(20.7) 230(17.2) atcd fr+ceYing and thavilq udder sat cd 41 -Th"Duribtkty..1%a��"���d by Pest ar by 1?raven fold PftfQn �tce u ca�adi�ions ot�. tticy shy� have id vgc duttbllity for the intcn-�d use. WbCQ t�6 is that the se w wail otuta e9 low - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------•------------ MAR-18-1998 10:50 N.S. SILICA 860 28.2 9885 P.04/05 BALLOT iltHd Subror[u:lYfte C ISO Task Gcisup C 1 S 03Ot p�giaedn$Maokg Date; 006 Tier to demons nit free dut�ability.the units sha.l be WN4 in xccor�duct rcquirad by the spry With$ettion 7.3• 'co l WitA Gifu of tht following: 1;tht weight I=of etldb of five fA4—__ "ten S lime sh>u �+ the Wei t 101s of aft of 104 aytics shall not rex 19�r of its initla�wEtght.or�.� � i��ttiat at tho conclusi the fiYe test s rtsao'as at thG conclusion of r�tYtle.�shall not tear 1,S E of tour of P� weight. 3, Pe missible V ohs in D11411nsioas $ fot wilt hsi$K ad length $hail dlfffct by ttot more thAd t IM Im t (3-2 S.t Over dots . ttutz)fzdm the 6PWX4 6WW4 bami"t. NOTS It TM trot"width" r&jto*0 h0d=tlt4 dittoWl of*0 00it f*NUM pe l"@ to the cap e of the waU (mm tht exposed turfw of the utdt to the Wk of the kin it. ' t to the UW men to the vest W dime 4;1 of ka unit &j pad in the will. The term Length M*Ahara onvl di ion of flux unit Mmumd pe1W to the runnx081WO of rise=well. 5.1.1 Dt ioffal to • WMWe Mquitwom for w+idt 60 be waived NO erchittMral tplii (seed Wdow► b. latish card Appea ce that would lnween WA slab r All gain be $000d ettd ft a of crtu h ar ot# r t oc� �t • or would lipi dy the$not*or P !scQ o f do cW� p1VcMat of eta�t to or a sac,c 8 :�ultletg fit c $ots y wok$ lnadfttttl to tba a" rad�of for tt�actiotl. dada of�0�gy p !sod drtr 'yI me t�FM* .� the faro or fay tit IIt�O to be 6.2 wM+e ow am to be t� in eat � cnp�trga or otbrr inspEsfcatio9 wit vibw►vd axpos44 ski clot shoo+ ebips or aWJ0, not otb p�attt d. frost►Z dist CG of not lad tbet 20 R(6,1 m)uAr dithud I18ha is 1 25.4 rtim) to any boa+ ar 6,3 hive pexctttc of a WPM conwtung+CbfPa not l,aW thaaat ( c na�tv�nal height of�unit h cracks not vida that 0,02 l {O.S MW and act longar tW 2396 of th 7. SWWUgj ad TaWng � n `vo s be t" P fWUUe6 to ltr cad 7A TM or w iampin unhi at dtG pie of rt I I'f+ Boss the lots TOWY for dolivety. , `vd xgclt, ab��i4n, and d uricnsrbt>;t toler�eoa to 7.��unpir Ltd � u�►ts 1'Qt c4m Wcoweam with C 1401 tip le ad feet lyre spo�ctm�aa for fits-thaw dutebitlf y.ip w►eeer in � 7.3*un teR ,�P sh$il be b�vd en frosts of ands Mxds with the 68M TWMdA , with C t262• F •t�' dttAlb� ss, and outing method. condt�tod ,,scat more char ?.4 hianth$ c0t�te tttix drslgn, ntaaaieotw��' p� mar to deiiv+ery►, 8. Re#oction f a s • to fog to �foari to the spv�.ified teguimofafs. tha L l It tbd sue°' tad i news 1a shall be eekmd by ttt� uiiaDutte'smell be qW tb eve unlit fiQR1 the shlprneiu.andp - ----------- MAR-16-199S 10=51 N.E. SILICA 860 282 9385 P.05i05 SALLbT ITEMS Subcom net C Is-01 HMCNY 2 Task Group C 15-03.01 «rietnecfn,Mewing Datr; o6196 � he pynh�t from the retained lot 0'd ccSted oc tie expeus'c of the tnanuf*rtvicet. If the gccorud sempIc t ocs.the entiz�dot shy be Injected. �s11s to cvntolrnn to the spccil'ie�d ccqul� 9. Keywords vs �e1� cnmptcssive strength, c;oecrcte mu cm uhf is 9.1 Abjo�a& egSM18 oar c tsQtctio ditnensiotts,durability,weight clUdfAtion �mcionale: with the regvizG�C� ai this stes►daard tlivc been suroe�c bolay ScgstceAtmi retaining wall utt:ts + tplring wall Urdu curmady 8 v danonstratc�d good Acid petforrtaAcC� SetaLeate! rotaiwe6 used and have .�in acto c with this stlAd�ucd so that both the 0 supplied to the m�upt shcwld'be s=' ' undemanding of the o�pe«d level of perfcnn end file supplier t�,vc c}ta euurx� UA pmd" l.� Halms Itgtw page 4 of 4 BB BAHLER BROTHERS INC. INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVERS 240 BEELZEBI'B ROAD SO.WINDSOR,CT 06074 SHOWROOM(860)872-8632 OFFICE(860)644-8598 FAX(860)644-3637 LACAVA CONSTRUCTION CO. DATE 10/21/97 r EL 860-563-37 185 S I LAS DEAN HIGHWAY WORK TO BE PERFORMED A Lot #67 Ridgefield, South Windsor JOB LOCATION WETHERSFIELD CT 06109 C/O JOB PHONE BRIAN BEECHINOR WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FORINTERLOCKING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING BAHLER BROTHERS THE OPPORTUNITY OF SUBMITTING THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. HERE ARE THE FOLLOWING FIVE STEPS INCLUDED IN YOUR PRICE ESTIMATE: STEP ONE, EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROX. EIGHTEEN INCHES WIDE BY TWELVE INCHES DEEP AND COMPACT TO ENSURE A FIRM SUB BASE. STEP TWO, SUPPLY AND INSTALL FOUR TO SIX INCHES OF PROCESSED GRAVEL TO PROVIDE PROPER BASE AND COMPACT IT. STEP THREE, SUPPLY AND INSTALL WALL SYSTEM OF CUSTOMERS CHOICE. STEP FOUR, SUPPLY AND INSTALL A DRAINAGE FIELD OF 3/4" CRUSHED STONE BEHIND THE WALL, WITH A 4" P.V.C. PIPE AT BOTTOM FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. (FILTER FABRIC IS OPTIONAL). STEP FIVE, SUPPLY AND INSTALL CAPS (CHOSEN ACCORDING TO WALL SYSTEM)WITH A CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE, DESIGNED FOR CONCRETE. ***ANY WALLS OVER FOUR FEET IN HEIGHT OR AREAS WITH STEEP SLOPES WILL NEED SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING THE USE OF A GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT MATERIAL. *** INCLUDE YES ( x ) NO ( ) WE DO GUARANTEE ALL OF OUR LABOR AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF (FIVE)YEARS. ONCE AGAIN WE WANT TO THANK YOU,AND HOPE TO BE OF FURTHER SERVICE TO YOU. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US. SKETCH PROVIDED NOT TO SCALE. TO BE USED AS P REFERENCE AND TO ESTIMATE THE WORK BEING PROPOSED. ANYTHING NOT SPECIFIED ON THIS PROPOSAL IS NOT INCLUDED. ** OUR WORK SCHEDULE IS APPROXIMATELY( 2-3 )WEEKS,WEATHER PERMITTING,FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. a.a. "'r-2c) '.+• i DES• (t'� ti� (-� +c<:�v� �T, �-47 NZ L' E lk,`1• Dlf�• 4�tCo Uo.4& 6 286.25 4 L 17..5112 ZSo. ¢ �.34 9+w L 7.21 2bs.82 —.43 74vo-o o0 9.55 ZB�.:�B -T•P�`1 0.00 Zbs•s,�; -7,46 Za5 s5 9.94- 7-53,v J -.3g �o-koo 0.3q- 285.21 s•. 51 co 9.8Z lo-loo lofoo D.� 284.6� -,sq. Gi L 6,21 "GI3 .7 6 �.3 4 1l40c;' I.91 Z83.-S& .s t G-t oo 6•?�'S 28v. i 422 I Roo L2,213 283.2-I -.3 �fvo 4w.lZ Z8b.31 I(4C>C> 7-.3cp 283•IG —.4Z I� 1-+0o L 4•cy9 wb.0 4- --viLr— 57� Z79.85 *•.� 74 of 5.07 z87.%(, -.3 12,10A;' L 6.11 2"r?.44- —A� 6.13 'LI7.+-L .43 64 L 6. 11 13fo�I; 11.3-1 Z'14•IS —0+6 ' m -aim I Al ' � _ I�Z►I98 G AL t 14�'� L 11.50 lop 269.C4 -.SO Srv►1� 2. 288.ds 286.E i WED R I d.5S 26g•co -.43 D+50 4.2'9 284.36 .4 UZ ZB4.o3 -,33 li;*w-L 21.49 Z64 P ; , 4.S w+•0-1 -,Zoe w• Iri� 21 .52 264.a� -.42 1+00 6.65 282.0o 154Sa 1400 L� -7•03 Z51.6Z -.35 II r •-- 1 23.36', Z62. 14 co K 7•o l 281.64 l.3G 1S4 SO 23.3 ? z6't.I -,3� 'L4vo �Q.82 2?3.63 74.4-6 461. 'i L IS.I� Z?3.�q- -•29 jj 2.400� IS•a� Z?3.�G -.21 0,710I 23.Z5 265,40 4400 9•z5 44co, L 9.5� 256.60 -•34~ 41� Tli, Des(, (f IAy PIPE. 5400' l_, 11.13 z48.46 -.23 sf co 1*7.8L 248.311 ,32, r ?A I.9b —.33 � .r, S4,14 Z4.+l ?Arl, b = 6. 6+sue b•5� v4o.6�- M • Jim 84. C ~ T 074CS ?d&U&Ot • 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 X-C°�' AREA CODE 860/644.2511 FAX 860/644-3781 October 6, 1998 Mr. Joseph P. LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Re: Ridgefield Subdivision Dear Mr. LaCava: We have reviewed your September 10, 1998 letter concerning the base pavement on Ridgefield Drive and Summerwind. Another inspection of the existing pavement was made and it was determined that samples of the pavement needed to be obtained in an attempt to determine the reason for the alligator cracking and the depth of pavement at the structures. I contacted Brian and received approval to obtain samples of the pavement. On September 28, 1998, four (4) samples were obtained from Ridgefield Drive. The results were as follows: Pavement thickness in "broken up area" 3/4", adjacent to catch basin 2 1/4 in average area 1 3/4 , in cul-de-sac 1 1/2 . The attached sketch indicates the approximate locations. Samples were not taken in Summerwind as we assumed they would be the same. We also took cross sections of these roads every 100 feet to determine if the proper cross slope is in place. Attached is a copy of those results. With a 26'wide pavement with a required 3/8" per foot slope, would result in a difference of .406 feet from the center line elevation to the elevation at the curb. As you can see, the cross slopes vary from .27 to .48 feet on Ridgefield and from .09 to .47 feet on Summerwind. Also the height of the curb from pavement to top of curb is 5 1/2". With all of this data, in hand, we feel that the paving work proposed in your letter of September 10, 1998 will not adequately address our concerns. Items that need to be addressed satisfactorily are: curb height, cross slopes and inadequate pavement thickness. Page Two Mr. Joseph P. LaCava October 6, 1998 We believe that after you have an opportunity to review this information and have a proposed plan to address our issues, a meeting should take place. If you have any questions, please call me at 644-2511, extension 245. Very truly yo rs, J C. azze .E. T wn gineer JCl/sfg cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Wor Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning A4 r1M st, r t� T-a 0-le S-Oum ?d&U&ot 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 R-Ce AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 October 13, 1998 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Cr 06109 Re: Ridgefield Subdivision Dear Mr. LaCava: The measures for addressing the concerns expressed in my October 6, 1998 letter, suggested at our October 9, 1998 meeting have been reviewed. It is our opinion that as a minimum the following measures should be taken for Summerwind Drive and Ridgefield Drive: 1) Town representatives will mark out areas of alligator cracking that may be deficient in pavement thickness. These areas will be opened up and if the pavement thickness is not 1 1/2 ", then those areas will be cut out and repaved to 1 1/2"thickness. 2) The pavement area on Ridgefield identified in my letter as having 3/a" pavement will be cut out until a minimum of 1 1/2" pavement is found. This area will be patched with a minimum of 1 1/2"compacted pavement. 3) Catch basins and manholes will be raised 1"without use of rings. 4) Deficiencies in cross slope will be"dressed out". 5) A 1/2"thick layer of Class 12 bituminous will be applied and feathered at the gutter line. 6) Overlay the entire area with 1 1/2"of Class 2 bituminous concrete pavement. Page Two Mr. Joseph LaCava October 13, 1998 Please contact Mr. Mel Stead at 644-2511, extension 218 to coordinate the patching and raising of structures. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 644-2511, extension 245. Very truly yours, Jerry C. Iazzetta, P.E. Town Engineer JCl/sfg cc: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Mel Stead, Superintendent of Street Services Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Joseph J. Perna, Project Engineer (.�i CON TR 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY S UCTION CO. WETHE RSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (860)563-3711 October 27, 1998 IVED Ms. Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning OCT 1998 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue �p� South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 °4 `: `A; " ! a`� �� °- • RE: Ridgefield Section IV Dear Ms. Banach We have completed the subdivision improvements on the above referenced subdivision. We are, therefore, requesting release of the bond and town acceptance of the roadways. Would you please let me know at your earliest convenience the amount of the maintenance bond that will be required. Please call me if you have any question. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, LACAVA CONSTUCTION COMPANY Joseph P. LaCava Cc. Attorney Peter Alter THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... MEMORANDUM TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning FROM: Jerry C. Iazzetta, Town Engine DATE: December 16, 1998 RE: Ridgefield Subdivision Section IV We have reviewed the request for a bond reduction to maintenance level and acceptance of the infrastructure for the Ridgefield Subdivision Section IV. There are a number of minor items that need to be addressed and can be taken care of under the maintenance bond (see attached). Therefore, we recommend that the bond be reduced to maintenance level and infrastructure accepted. JCl/sfg encl. r Memo To: Jerry C. Iazzetta,Town Engineer From: Tracy A. LaPiene, Project Engineer Date: 12/15/98 Re: Ridgefield Subdivision Sect. IV 88-07P On 12/14/98 and 12/15/98 I made an inspection of the condition of the improvements and found the following items that need to be addressed; As-Builts As-Builts for Ridgefield and Summerwind are required Lighting • 3 lightpoles have broken glass on the tops-on Ridgefield across from Summerwind,at cul-de- sac and in middle Signage Subdivision sign at Felt Rd to be removed Street signs at intersections to have both road names on signs • Stop bars to be painted Sidewalks Handicapped ramp west side of int. of Summerwind and Krawski-relay as to prevent gutterflow from going onto ramp and move to north and provide taper curb from C.B. • Sidewalk section west side of int. of Summerwind and Krawski between C.B. and mon.jack or replace(has 3/8"step) 2 sections in front of#55 Ridgefield to be replaced Bitumi ous curbing • Bet en driveways#99&# dgefield to be replaced • 121.f. of#107 Rid d driveway to be replaced D • 15 l.f so of#13 dgefield driveway to be replaced • 341.f. south of cul-de-sac between#136 &#124 Ridgefield t ep aced • 211 locat west of C.B.#4 Sta 11+60 R Ridgefield to be replaced 2—21. ections 0' north of Krawski on west side of Summerwind 91 . at int. of Sum m ind&Ridgefield south of handicapped ramp on west side of erwind Storm Drainage • All C.B. sumps to be cleaned Plantings To be checked by Planning Dept. tal Townhall/vo2/Eng/Proj-P&ZJRidgefieldI V/pnchlst 121598 dt 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE•SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 December 17, 1998 Mr. Joseph P. LaCava LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: Re: Appl#88-07P,Ridgefield This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 16, 1998 to reduce the subdivision bond from$150,000 to$46,500. Please forward an amendment,to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. The maintenance bond will expire on December 16, 1999. Very truly yours, PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro,Jr., Chairman FAC/dlw cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official �y 185 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION CO. WETHERSFIELD CONNECTICUT 06109 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS TELEPHONE: (860)563-3711 January 4, 1999 Ms. Marcia A. Banach Director of Planning Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue ��s�a t4 South Windsor Connecticut 06074 .�ow6w�1 4 RE: Ridgefield Application #88-07P Dear Ms. Banach: In response to your request in your letter dated December 17, 1998, please find enclosed a Maintenance Bond in the amount of$46,500.00. At your earliest convenience, please return the following bonds to me: E S 10051;0641 B CA ' 7 SB 1005 A 007 SB 100646814 7 SB 100684957 7 SB 100110234 Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY nosephLaCava Enclosure pb THE SYMBOL OF HOME BUILDING EXCELLENCE ..... �towM +++ t� ci u _ 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE*SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074-2786 R.c0�'` AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 January 15, 1999 Mr: Joseph P. LaCava LaCava Construction Co. 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: Re: Appl#88-07P,Ridgefield—revision to 12/17/98 letter This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on December 16, 1998 to reduce the subdivision bond from$150,000 to a maintenance level of $46,500. Please forward an amendment to the bond we are currently holding showing this reduction at your earliest convenience. The maintenance bond will expire on December 16, 1999. Very truly yours, PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Jr., Chairman FAC/dlw cc: Town Engineer Chief Building Official a w" •�4 r T_0� �S ?dzn� �u 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE• SOUTH WINDSOR,CT 06074.2786 ~°soX.co�' AREA CODE 860/644-2511 FAX 860/644-3781 February 4, 1999 Mr. Joseph LaCava LaCava Construction Company 185 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, CT 06109 Dear Mr. LaCava: Re: Appl 988-07P, Ridgefield This is to advise you that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on January 26, 1999 to release the $15,000 IWA/CC bond for the above-referenced project. Advance arrangements should be made to pick up the bond to ensure that the necessary contact person(s) will be available. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department at 644-2511, ext. 252. Thank you. Very truly yours, - PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION Frank A. Castro, Chairman FAC/dlw cc: Town Engineer tfs-6 LEGAL SERVICES REQUEST FORM DEPARTMENT : PZC CONTROL # qR' 16 Type of Review Date of Request Date Received Date Date of Review Dispatched 3/22/99 (Check Appropriate Box) ❑ Contractual ❑ Statutory ❑ Regulatory Other (Please specify) Deeds for Appl. #88-07P, Ridgefield Estates Subdivision Please review the attached deeds for Ridgefield Estates Open Space Subdivision for acceptance by the Town. If you have any question, please call. Signature: 1AYUUa * (To be filled in by Town Manager's Office) a-J VOL. 1073PAGE 66 WARRANTEE DEED 229$ TO ALL PEOPLE TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING: KNOW YE, that LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having its principal office and place of business in the Town of Wethersfield, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, acting herein by Joseph P. LaCava, its President, duly authorized, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor" for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, received to its full satisfaction of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said Town of South Windsor, its successors and assigns, the following described pieces or parcels of land: Three certain pieces or parcels of land, being all of the OPEN SPACE within a subdivision known as "RIDGEFIELD" and being situated on the easterly side of Felt Road, in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being more particularly shown on certain maps or plans entitled: "Ridgefield Section IV Property of LaCava Construction Company Felt Road, Ridgefield Drive, Summerwind South Windsor, Connecticut Close, Jensen & Miller Consulting Engineers, Land Planners & Surveyors 1137 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Scale 1"=40' Date Dec. 1987 Sheet No. One Of Two, Sheet No. Two of Two Revisions 5/12/88 Staff Comments 6/7/88 Staff Comments 7.5.88 Staff Comments" which maps or plans are on file in the South Windsor Town Clerk's Office as Map Nos 1953-A and 1953-B. Said premises are more particularly bounded and described on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises, with the appurtenances thereof, unto it the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use and behoof. And also it the said Grantor does for itself, its successors and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these presents, it is well seised of the premises, as a good indefeasible estate in Fee Simple; and has good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. AND FURTHERMORE, it the said Grantor does by these presents bind itself and its successors and assigns forever to Warrant and Defend the above granted and bargained premises to it the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. CONVEYANCE TAX R TOM CLM Cr sou o�o� VOL. 1073PAGE 67 SCHEDULE A Three certain pieces or parcels of land, being all of the OPEN SPACE within a subdivision known as "RIDGEFIELD" and being situated on the easterly side of Felt Road, in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being more particularly shown on certain maps or plans entitled: "Ridgefield Section IV Property of LaCava Construction Company Felt Road, Ridgefield Drive, Summerwind South Windsor, Connecticut Close, Jensen & Miller Consulting Engineers, Land Planners & Surveyors 1137 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Scale 1"=40' Date Dec. 1987 Sheet No. One Of Two Sheet No. Two Of Two Revisions 5/12/88 Staff Comments 6/7/88 Staff Comments 7.5.88 Staff Comments", which maps are on file in the South Windsor Land Records as Map No. 1953-A and 1953-B. FIRST PIECE A certain piece or parcel of land situated on the northeasterly side and to the rear of Ridgefield Drive in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being shown as "Open Space To Be Deeded to Town of South Windsor 177,057 S.F. or 4.065 Ac." on the above-referenced maps or plans, more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point which marks the northwesterly corner of Lot 53 and the northeasterly corner of the herein-described premises, thence proceeding S 63° 56' 40" E along land now or formerly of Mary E. McGaffrey, a distance of 138.05 feet to a point; thence proceeding S 64° 33' 40" E, along land now or formerly of David E. & Elizabeth A. Schako, a distance of 138.20 feet to a point; thence continuing S 64' 28' 24" E, along land now or formerly of Robert E. & Gail Ann Shepler, Joseph Henry &Regina J. Adams, William G. &Marilyn T. Reveley, Charles A. & Deborah K. Sella and Town of South Windsor Open Space, in part by each, in all, a distance of 572.50 feet to a point; thence continuing along other land shown as "Existing Open Space Town of South Windsor 4.801 Acres", S 32' 24' 08" W, a distance of 311.50 feet to a point; thence N 57° 35' 51" W, along other land shown as "Existing Open Space Town of South Windsor, a distance of 340.00 feet to a point; thence proceeding S 77° 00' 56" W along Lot 57 as shown on said map, a distance of 24.98 feet; thence proceeding N 32° 21' 34" W along Lot 57, a distance of 104.79 feet to a point; thence proceeding S 57* 38' 26" W along Lot 57, a distance of 163.44 feet to a point in the streetline of Ridgefield Drive; thence continuing along the arc of a curve along said Ridgefield Drive having a radius of 65.00 feet, a distance of 25.38 feet to a point which marks the southeasterly corner of Lot 56, thence continuing N 57" 38' 26" E, a distance of 160.13 feet to a point, thence proceeding N 32° 21' 34" W, a distance of 406.64 feet to the point and place of beginning. 3 VOL. 1073PAGE GS SECOND PIECE A certain piece or parcel of land situated on the northeasterly side and to the rear of Ridgefield Drive in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being shown as "Existing Open Space Town of South Windsor 4.801 Acres" on the above- referenced maps or plans, more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point in the northwesterly corner of the herein-described premises and the northeasterly corner of the parcel shown as "Open Space To Be Deeded to Town of South Windsor 177,057 S.F. or 4.065 Ac.", thence S 32° 24' 08" W, a distance of 311.50 feet to a point; thence N 57° 35' 51" W along land shown as "Open Space To Be Deeded to Town of South Windsor 177,057 S.F. or 4.065 Ac.", a distance of 340.00 feet to a point; thence S 12° 59' 04" E, a distance of 656.54 feet to a point; thence S 66° 54' 54" E, a distance of 290.90 feet to a point; thence N 38° 46' 47" E along land now or formerly of Phillip Foster Pierce & Janet Marie Pierce, a distance of 74.75 feet to a point; thence S 76° 39' 26" E, a distance of 42.51 feet to a point; thence N 03° 31' 14" E, a distance of 43.82 feet to a point; thence N 16° 42' 35" W, along land show as Parcel "B" Open Space to Be Deeded to Town of South Windsor 4.196 Acres, a distance of 530.07 feet to a point; thence proceeding N 22° 32' 51" E, a distance of 35.33 feet to a point; thence continuing N 32' 24' 08" E, a distance of 221.39 feet to a point, thence continuing N 64° 28' 24" W, a distance of 35.22 feet to the point and place of beginning. THIRD PIECE: A certain piece or parcel of land situated on the northeasterly side and to the rear of Ridgefield Drive in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being shown as "PARCEL "B" Open Space To Be Deeded to Town of South Windsor 4.196 Acres" on the above-referenced maps or plans, more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point which marks the southeasterly corner of the herein-described premises; thence proceeding N 20' 19' 30" E, a distance of 324.86 feet to a point; thence S 69° 40' 30" E, a distance of 178.00 feet to a point; thence proceeding on an arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet, a distance of 39.27 feet to a point on the westerly side of Foster Street, thence N 200 19' 30" E, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point in the westerly side of Foster Street; thence proceeding on an arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet, a distance of 39.27 feet to a point; thence continuing N 69° 40' 30" W, a distance of 178.00 feet to a point; thence proceeding N 20' 19' 30" E, a distance of 308.50 feet to a point which marks the northeasterly corner of the herein-described premises; thence N 64" 28' 24" W, a distance of 321.39 feet to a point; thence S 32" 24' 08" W, a distance of 221.39 feet to a point; thence S 22' 32' 51" W, a distance of 35.33 feet to a point; thence S 16' 42' 35" E, a distance of 530.07 feet to a point; thence S 03° 31' 14" W, a distance of 43.82 feet to a point; thence S 760 39' 26" E, along land now or formerly of Phillip Foster Pierce &Janet Marie Pierce, a distance of 36.10 feet to the point and place of beginning. 4 VOL. 1073PAGE 69 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY has hereunto set its hand and seal this 2 9 t h day of March 1999. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AkK-67- By:zz Lly(j ter oseph P. LaCava, Its President Duly Authorized Concetta M. Favuzza STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) SS. Glastonbury March 29, 1999 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this the 29thday of March , 1999, before me, Peter Jay Alter the undersigned officer, personally appeared Joseph P. LaCava, who acknowledged himself to be the President of LaCava Construction Company, a corporation, and that he as such President, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation by himself as President. ter Ja A ter gDAPR - 5 1999 ommissio r of Superior Court RECEIVED FOR REGO., AT a:4 5 P M . RECORDED I.N SOOTP,WINDSOR' - LAND RECORDS VOL ht 7 PAGE�� BY f T WN CL K •TOWN CLERK 2 VOL. 10 73PAGE 70 WARRANTEE DEED 2 TO ALL PEOPLE TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING: KNOW YE, that LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having its_principal office and place of business in the Town of Wethersfield, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, acting herein by Joseph P. LaCava, its President, duly authorized, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor" for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, received to its full satisfaction of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said Town of South Windsor, its successors and assigns, the following described piece or parcel of land: A certain piece or parcel of land located on the westerly side and to the rear of Foster Street, shown as land N/F JOSEPH KRAWSKI, in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being more particularly shown on maps or plans entitled: "Ridgefield Section IV Property of LaCava Construction Company Felt Road, Ridgefield Drive, Summerwind South Windsor, Connecticut Close, Jensen& Miller Consulting Engineers, Land Planners & Surveyors 1137 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Scale 1" = 200' Date Dec. 1987 Sheet No. One Of One Revisions 5/12/88 Staff Comments 6/7/88 Staff Comments 7.5.88 Staff Comments" which map or plan is on file in the South Windsor Town Clerk's Office as Map No. 1952-B. Said premise are more particularly bounded and described on map or plan entitled: "SECTION I SUBDIVISION PLAN KRAWSKI ESTATES PROPERTY OF WILLIAM KRAWSKI ET AL FELT ROAD SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. SCALE 1" =40' JAN 3, 1983 SHEET 3 OF 7 REV. 7-10-83 RENUMBER LOTS, ELIMINATE LOT 9 & 10, OPEN SPACE 7-2-83 OPEN SPACE EASEMENT PREPARED BY DOUGLAS PRIOR LAND SURVEYOR TOLLAND, CONN" which map or plan is recorded on the South Windsor Land Records as Map No. 836B, to which reference may be had. Beginning at a point in the southeasterly comer of land shown as OPEN SPACE AREA = 2.07 AC on the above-referenced map, which point marks the southwesterly corner of the herein-described premises; thence proceeding S 66' 08' 03" E, a distance of 308.58 feet to a point; thence proceeding N 06° 14' 51" W, a distance of 328.39 feet to a point; thence N 66° 54' 54" W, a distance of 213.90 feet along other Existing Open Space Town of South Windsor; thence proceeding S 09' 52' 26" W, a distance of 289.75 feet to the point and place of beginning. CONVEYANCE TAX RECEIVED STAM S ..LOCAL� ...._.....Nor X s . UNM cLM of SOM WNDSM voL. 1073PAGE 71 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises, with the appurtenances thereof, unto it the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use and behoof. And also it the said Grantor does for itself, its successors and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these presents, it is well seised of the premises, as a good indefeasible estate in Fee Simple; and has good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. AND FURTHERMORE, it the said Grantor does by these presents bind itself and its successors and assigns forever to Warrant and Defend the above granted and bargained premises to it the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY has hereunto set its hand and seal this 29th day of March , 1999. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By: ^erJa-,/ ter J seph P. aCava, Its President Duly Authorized Al Concetta M. Favuzza STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) SS. Glastonbury March 29, 1999 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this the 29thday of March , 1999, before me, Peter Jay Alter the undersigned officer, personally appeared Joseph P. LaCava, who acknowledged himself to be the President of LaCava Construction Company, a corporation, and that he as such President, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation by himself as President. Lk--t eter J y lter n �gggl Commis er of Superior Court �;�.CE6VED FOR'.RECO 'o x AT o2: 5 P ►'YI, RECORDED 111 SOJITH WINDSOR v RECORDS VOL 107 PAGE---. 1 0 N CIJRK "TOWN CLERK 6 vol. 10 7 3 PAGE 72 WARRANTEE DEED 2300 TO ALL PEOPLE TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING: KNOW YE, that LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having its principal office and place of business in the Town of Wethersfield, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, acting herein by Joseph P. LaCava, its President, duly authorized, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor" for the consideration of ONE DOLLAR($1.00) and other valuable consideration, received to its full satisfaction of the TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, a municipal corporation having its territorial limits within the County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, does give, grant, bargain, sell and confirm unto the said.Town of South Windsor, its successors and assigns, the following described piece or parcel of land: Four certain pieces or parcels of land, being all of the roadways within a subdivision known as "RIDGEFIELD" and being situated on the easterly side of Felt Road, in the Town of South Windsor, County of Hartford and State of Connecticut, being more particularly shown as: "Ridgefield Drive" "Summerwind" D "Krawski Drive" m " Files Way" A Fn on a certain map or plan entitled: o "Ridgefield Section IV Property of LaCava Construction Company Felt Road, o o ; South Windsor Connecticut Close Jensen & ` ' Ridgefield Drive, Summerwind Miller Consulting Engineers, Land Planners & Surveyors 1137 Silas Deane z , Highway Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109 Scale 1" = 200' Date Dec. 1987 SheetCn No. One Of One Revisions 5/12/88 Staff Comments 7.5.88 Staff Comments" ° z which map or plan is on file in the South Windsor Town Clerk's Office as Map No. 1952-B. P TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and bargained premises, with the appurtenances thereof, unto it the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, to its and their own proper use and behoof. And also it the said Grantor does for itself, its successors and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that at and until the ensealing of these presents, it is well seised of the premises, as a good indefeasible estate in Fee Simple; and has good right to bargain and sell the same in manner and form as is above written and that the same is free from all encumbrances whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. AND FURTHERMORE, it the said Grantor does by these presents bind itself and its successors and assigns forever to Warrant and Defend the above granted and bargained premises to it the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all claims and demands whatsoever, except as hereinbefore mentioned. VOL. 1073PAGE 73 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY has hereunto set its hand and seal this 2 9 t h day of March , 1999. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: LACAVA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY A&VP q5c- By: Ater J y Alter se h P. LaCava, Its President Duly Authorized OL Concetta M. Favuzza STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss. Glastonbury March 29, 1999 COUNTY OF HARTFORD ) On this the 29thlay of March , 1999, before me, Peter Jay Alter the undersigned officer, personally appeared Joseph P. LaCava, who acknowledged himself to be the ; President of LaCava Construction Company, a corporation, and that he as such President, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation by himself as President. IgE� eter Ja f1ter APR - 5 1999 If19 ommissi er of Superior Court RKPIVED FOR REGO D ---w AT a ;45 Pm }_A�o'JP RECORDS VOL 1 7 PAU�Z 3`:' TM' a QLEtRe 'TOWN CLERK 2 ALTER AND SHERWOOD, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 HEBRON AVENUE P.O.BOX 1420 GLASTONBURY,CONNECTICUT 06033-6620 DAVID F.SHERWOOD TELECOPIER PETER JAY ALTER TELEPHONE (860) (352-4020 (860) (352-4022 March 31, 1999 Vol, IR E CIF DI E D .;Gretchen E. Bickford,Town Clerk � 1999 Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: LaCava Construction Company to the Town of South Windsor Ridgefield Subdivision Dear Sir or Madam: Attached please find three Warranty Deeds,together with the necessary conveyance tax forms for each,along with a check made payable to you in the amount of$55.00 to cover the recording fees for these documents. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. Yours very truly, ALTER AND SHERWOOD,LLC Peter ay lter Enclosures cc: Joseph P. LaCava Michele Lipe ALTER AND SHERWOOD, LLc ATTORNEYS AT LAW Cj W 701 HEBRON AVENUE P.O.BOX 1420 MAY GLASTONBURY,CONNECTICUT 06033-6620 Ni DAVID F.SHERWOOD TELECOPIER-1 �j PETER JAY ALTER TELEPHONE (860) 652-4020 aa 0�A�,2-•4022 May 3, 1999 Michele R. Lipe, AICP Town of South Windsor 1540 Sullivan Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 Re: LaCava to Town of South Windsor Ridgefield Subdivision, South Windsor, CT Dear Michele: I am enclosing the following Warranty Deeds from LaCava Construction Company to the Town of South Windsor which have been recorded on the South Windsor Land Records and were inadvertently returned to me: 1) Warranty Deed for all roadways dated March 29, 1999 and recorded in Volume 1073, Pages 72-73; 2) Warranty Deed for Open Space Area(land now or formerly Joseph Krawski) dated March 29, 1999 and recorded in Volume 1073, Pages 70-71; 3) Warranty Deed for three pieces or parcels of land, all being Open Space within the subdivision dated March 29, 1999 and recorded in Volume 1073, Pages 66-69. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Yours very truly, ALTER AND SHERWOOD, LLC Peter Jay Alter Enclosures _TT • , �/� � r • `1 ,:,•1: 'v�ron �cc�.o�ll j open :I� P act O/ JV Town , or It O Q 0Ave ® a ; : Kr�o waKi Drive lox ts �. . tile's )V74Grernr'i ! 3ubrJivision . z' Town Windsor- ` Open Spore tc fir: `� .^ } a.• ._ Re : 5/2 als7 C,,,; u rm—�. �• C��,O�e a iefl �j �t���'� Designed PP c f• / Consulting Engineers, Land Planners a Surveyors Drown L IiV. `- •�-��. Dote —Description /07 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield Connecticut 06109 Checked Scale r z000 '- :�Y• Revisions DateMAYZQ 1987 .y•Y ' j j- - h l .• CONCEPT PLAN _ RIDGE Fl" I Sheet ' DR v� I�N510N TO FOOTj" STREEr Na. PI�iER7Y OF , a 4 r_r -► rnn. r, Job No. 1122 lot i* 17 Tallwood iv ti Autumn-- Drive Z8 i 33 10 13 18 7 9 S lmd-vision 9 II IZ f7 f6 15 14 [C8 Z9 48 49 50 51 52 J3 3 s4 90 d Ridaef ield - Jf - O �� - -- - pr�y - n' r � 39 f Sty 69 .- 73 6� 0 57 ne 6� H- 30 72 5 0 0, Sy 41 , t 65 , S8 34 71 66 �i �► ��- �----.0 9 ,_ , 42 ;Z9 ��� �D9 ._ 70 � 68 6 7 �Eh 66 6 5 64 6 3 6Z 6� 60 EllZ81 , 69 ik16;45 . : i,37 i `n i i 19,E 18 j `17 KrC1WSkl 4 Drive 4 _ _ ,z► , �� i �5 ; �6 , r71 1B tOt ' 45 or 51 5 7 46 47 48 49 50 52 , 53 54 55 56 w Open Space 87 - 89 Town of 5. Windsor 86 77 78 79 80 81 � 83 - 85 84 Gre i5uWii _ �aerr 4 e race . Le end ® pro o5ed Lot K OD ._ -- M Existing lot -in Ridgefield Sections � or II 5cal e 1 = 200' _ Direction of Drainage low in a Lion AreQ (ACre5 a- -0 pro O_ e. d - -5ani tares--5ew er it (LOt5 ZZ thru 38 11. 45 r�7 �ots) ------- Proposed 5�dowa�k - - -- -- - )- - - - r I 287 Tollwaxf Subdivilan ki ofe 3ubd:vrsion Eo•, (sec Ir 9 9 ! Y = )o d Open space Opan SparcAlA 0 / _ --� Qc. 4i / Z aoo � - o � � � oc ._ v v 14/ d �, Rid Id Drive e leld La Ridge-fie-1 � � Town of I L � I � - South Windsor O Open 5poce O © KrCiN/bki Dave � 1 . St les Open O O 5poce s 1Z' l�7 Qc. Greenridge Subdivision Town of Smith Windsor Open Space I Re : 5120/87 C'c Desii Drov Consulting Engineers, Land Planners 8k Surveyors Che4 /137 Silas Deane Highway Wethersfield , Connecticut 06109 Sca No. Date Descri tion Doti Revisions CONCEPT PLAN � Shea RIDGE FIELD DRIVE W.EN51ON TO F05TER STREET pROR,ER7Y OF Of L.aCQv4 COAMRUCTiON COMPANY Job SnI ITu Ulmin 5OR T T ZZ -; 23 24 Z5 20 ............. IOZ 93 95 99 3 0 1 50 94 I 32 I v ZI s Tail��� fir!`=e- -�-- - 4 5U d(VI,51orl- Sub ist n 7 I Ole 014 9 II ► IZ a; 37 Z9 0 3� 75 39 6 57 73 b' i 6 � 72 74 '30` ; 41 -- )4 71 �h 70 66 67 68 I?o; 43 _69 - g i 44 12-6 7 8 45 Dr h� 47 48 99 0 46cu w- pen Spoce_ iown of S w+nds 87 78 79 80 81 82 83 �4�� �a�r� i,y � 4.� 86 l� • ---- -- - - _g o ,-.� ---� i y' 84 76 Ore r+ _ e Z.4 4c+ o.i Ac.. f.I A<- Vie' -4- - �t��1 —o 1a4 `T) KiZAws KI L, 9 4 `-J _ c S. cis 9�6 47,z c es - --- -- ------ ------- - - - --_ C rC/ 2,4Ae- f o, I►c� 4�0 - � 4,, Z at-. -ta r A-IL. Leaend �h > " 2- 46-- proposed----lot - -