HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUBDIVISION 1213 (APPROVED, NEVER BUILT) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Application No. The Commssion will officially receive applications
Received Date: &— /� at its ,Regular meeting on the 4th Tuesday of the
Action or Public Hearing by: m nth, provided it has been submitted to the Can dssion
Chairman, Secretary or agent by 4:30 P.M. on the
Receipt No. Preceding day,
APPLICANT: 1ST '
PPLIC John G. Samsel,
ADDRESS: 419 Buckland Road, South Windsor., rT 06074
OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: John G. Samsel , Jr . and Theresa G. Samsel
ADDRESS : Same
COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: East side of Buckland Road, south of
Deming Street
ZONE AA-30
NAME , ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE
DIRECTED: Attorney John M. Casey, 25 Oakland Road, South Windsor, CT 06074
TELEPHONE 644-1528
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING)
1. Zone Change* to (public hearing required)
X 2 . Filing for Subdivision
3. Filing for Open Space Subdivision (public hearing required)
4 . Filing for Resubdivision (public hearing required)
5 . Special Exception to Article (public hearing required)
6. Site Plan of Development
7 . Removal of Sand, Gravel , Clay or Quarry Stone & Ore (public
hearing required)
8 . Other (explain in detail)
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
AND SUBMITTED WITH 6 SETS OF PLANS (7 sets if public hearing is required)
BEFORE IT IS RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION.
Applicant V OWNER
John G. Samsel , Jr . John G. Samsel , Jr .
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
Fee Schedule and Policv
1. An application processing fee of $25 per lot ($50 minimum) is required
for: Subdivisions, resubdivisions, and open space subdivisions.
2. An application processing fee of $50 is required for: Change of Zone,
Zoning Amendment, Special Exception, and Earth Removal or Land Filling
Operations.
3. An application processing fee of $25 is required for Site Development
Plans, except: where new buildings/additions/renovations of 2,000 s. f.
or more are proposed, said fee shall be $50; said fee shall be $500
for Site Development Plans in the Designed Commercial Zone; $50 plus
$5 per dwelling unit for Adult Housing ($500 minimum) .
4. An application processing fee of $10 per acre ($300 minimum) is required
for a Change of Zone/General Plan of Development in the Designed
Commercial Zone.
5. An application processing fee of $100 is required for a Change of Zone/
General Plan of Development in the Multi-Family or DA-15 Residential zones; or
for a Special Exception/General Plan of Development for Adult Housing.
6. An application processing fee of $50 plus $5 per dwelling unit is
required for a Special Exception/Site Plan of Development in the Multi-
Family or DA-15 Residential zones ($500.00 minimum).
7. Application processing fees are non-refundable after the application
has been officially received by the Commission. Application processing
fees may be returned prior to the application's official reception
provided a letter of withdrawal, signed by the applicant, has been
submitted to the Commission prior to the meeting at which said applica-
tion is scheduled to be officially received.
8. Applications unaccompanied by the required application processing fee
are incomplete, and as such may be returned to the applicant and
removed from the Commission's agenda.
9. Complete applications and required fees shall be submitted at least
fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the Regular or Special Meeting
at which it will be received.
10. Fees for a previously denied application shall not apply to any
subsequent application. However, when a subdivision, resubdivision,
or open space subdivision application has been denied within the
preceding 12 months or approved for fewer lots than requested, and a
new application for the subject tract is submitted by the same appli-
cant, then the fee for the new application shall be a minimum of $50
plus $25 for each lot above and beyond the number of lots contained in
the earlier application.
11. A fee of $5 per sign is required for signs to be posted by the
applicant on the subject property.
12. Other Fees: Subdivision Regulations - $3.00; Zoning Regulations - $4.00;
Zoning Map $1.00; fees for other documents is as determined by the
Commission.
13. All checks shall be made payable to "Town of South Windsor."
Adopted: 4/10/84
Revised: 12/4/84
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
In connection with
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
_ BUCKLAND ROAD
SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
Prepared For:
JOHN SAMSEL, JR.
Prepared by:
STORCH ENGINEERS
161 MAIN STREET
WETHERSFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06109
December 159 1986
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
in connection with
Proposed Residential Subdivision
Buckland Road
South Windsor, Connecticut
Prepared for:
John Samsel , Jr.
Prepared by:
STORCH ENGINEERS
161 Main Street
Wethersfield, Connecticut 06109
December 15, 1986
STORCH ENGINEERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Drawing No. 1 -, Area Location Map
I . INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. Study Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
B. Study Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II . EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
A. Site and Roadway Conditions. . . . . . . . . 2
Drawing No. 2 - Site Location
Drawing No. 3 - Roadway Layout
B. Traffic Volumes and Operations . . . . . . . 2
III. PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
r A. Proposed Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
B. Site Generated Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C. Traffic Safety Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . 3
IV. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . 5
APPENDIX
Glossary of Technical Terms
Automatic Traffic Recorder Counts
Trip Generation
Gap Study Results
r
FENGINEERS WETHERSFIELD,CT 06109
STORCH ENGINEERS
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Study Purpose
This study has been prepared by Storch Engineers for Mr. John
Samsel , Jr. to determine the traffic impacts of the proposed eleven lot
residential subdivision located on Buckland Road in South Windsor,
Connecticut. This report analyses existing and projected traffic
operations, at the site, with the intent of identifying potential
problem areas and developing methods to mitigate areas of traffic
concerns.
B. Study Process
The study consisted of the following tasks:
1. A field review of existing physical conditions on
Buckland Road at the proposed site entrance including a
review of road width, lighting, pavement markings,
signing, and sight distance.
Z. A continuous traffic count of vehicles travelling on
Buckland Road near the site entrance.
3. Observations were made of existing traffic conditions and
operational characteristics on Buckland Road at the
proposed site entrance including a vehicle gap analysis.
4. Accident data, obtained from the Connecticut Department
of Transportation (ConnDOT) was analyzed to determine if
any safety problems are evident in the area of the site.
5. Trips generated by the site were estimated, and their
impact on the adjacent roadway system were identified and
evaluated.
_.._ 1
STORCH ENGINEERS
H. EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. Site and Roadway Conditions
The proposed project lies in the southern section of South Windsor
(Drawing No. 1) . The site borders the eastern side of Buckland Road
approximately one mile north of Smith Street. The location of the site
is shown in Drawing No. 2.
Access to the site would be provided by a single entrance (Drawing
No. 3) intersecting Buckland Road. Buckland Road is a bituminous
concrete road 25 feet in width providing two 12-foot travel lanes which
are divided by a double yellow centerline. The posted speed limit on
Buckland Road is 35 miles per hour.
B. Traffic Volumes and Operations
A continuous traffic count was recorded on Buckland Road one-half
mile north of Smith Street starting on November 17, 1986 and continuing
into November 19, 1986. A summary of the continuous traffic recorder
count is included in the Appendix of this report. Based upon this
count, the 1986 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume was estimated at
13,600 vehicles.
A vehicle gap study was conducted on Buckland Road at the site, to
determine if an adequate number of gaps in traffic exist to safely allow
vehicles exiting the site to turn left onto Buckland Road. The 1985
Highway Capacity Manual , published by the Transportation Research Board,
defines 6.5 seconds as the minimum time needed for a vehicle to
successfully turn left from a minor road onto a major two-lane road.
The results of our gap study indicated that 164 gaps, 7 seconds or
longer, currently exist at the site entrance during the AM peak hour.
2
1 [ -owi� sco•r
Bit[t'Iv_ 14ILL '
74 RFrfIC
O
p ♦ /4t
1 <
4
,fr
�r p
�0 o�
1 G`"
` SAr�ERR
• LEY - � �y'� %, �`n r
_ TR
f
1 -
1 _ SITE °
LOCATION
of
'ref, o--
LoR
WIiVD __ _ ___ _ - - - - - - - --- _
SO _ _
S
MAN=CH�STER
JOHN SAMSEL
SOUTH WINDSOR , CONNECTICUT
t SCALE:N/A
SITE LOCATION MAP DRAWN BY:
R.B.SKK
JH F ED BY:
STORCH 161 RAIN STREET "BATE:
D EC..1986
ENGINEERS WETHERSFIELD,CT 06109 DW`. No.2
►
► I
I
m �
FUTURE ST.
1 R.O.W. --
I
I
1
I
I � _
1 o '
az
N
1 0 _
N
Rpp,O
I BUGK�'ANo
1
JOHN SAMSEL
SOUTH WINDSOR , CONNECTICUT
1 SCALE:
ROADWAY LAYOUT N/A
DRAWN BY:
R.B.S.
CHECKED BY:
STORCH 161 MAIN STREET AT C.1986
ENGINEERS WETHERSFIELD,CT 0610V DWCG. N0.3
STORCH ENGINEERS
III . PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS
A. Proposed Site
The proposed site under evaluation would consist of eleven
single-family houses. Access to the site would be provided by a single
cul-de-sac road intersecting the eastern side of Buckland Road at a
90-degree angle. This road would continue easterly for approximately
650 feet, servicing lots to either side before bearing to the south and
ending.
B. Site Generated Traffic
Estimates of vehicle trip generation for the proposed development
are based upon trip generation rates published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) in a report titled Trip Generation (third
edition). Table I illustrates these rates.
Vehicle trips estimated for the site are based upon an average trip
generation rate of 10 trips per household per day applied to the 11
single-family homes proposed to be built. Thus the development would
generate only 110 trips (55 in, 55 out) on a daily basis. A trip by
definition, is a one-way movement either into or out of the site.
Because the number of trips generated by the site on a daily basis
is extremely low, the time period of the day which will generate the
most exiting trips was analyzed in order to determine if the vehicle
gaps measured on Buckland Road can accommodate the exiting vehicles.
According to the Trip Generation Manual , the highest number of
exiting vehicles are generated during the AM peak hour ( .55 trips/unit).
Using this factor, the 11 houses are expected to generate 6 exiting
vehicles during the AM peak hour. A copy of the trip generation rates
used can be found in the Appendix of this report.
3
STORCH ENGINEERS
TABLE I
Average Trip-Rate Total Vehicle Trips
(Trips/Dwelling (Based on 111
Unit) Dwelling Units)
Average Weekday
Vehicle Trip Ends 10.0 110
AM Peak Hour
Enter 0.21 2
Exit 0.55 6
PM Peak Hour
Enter 0.63 7
Exit 0.37 4
C. Traffic Safety Analyses
Intersection sight distance was analyzed at the proposed site
— entrance looking both north and south on Buckland Road. The sight
distance to the north of the proposed entrance was found to be 700'±
while to the south it was 475'±. Institute of Transportation
-- Engineers (ITE) recommends 100 feet of visibility for each 10 m.p.h. for
speeds on the through street. Based on a posted speed limit of 35
m.p.h. on Buckland Road, a minimum sight distance of 350 would be
required according to ITE criteria. Therefore, available sight distance
is adequate in both directions.
— Accident data, for the years 1983-1985, was obtained from ConnDOT.
Over the three years analyzed, a total of 29 accidents occurred on
Buckland Road from its intersection with Smith Street to its
intersection with Deming Road, causing 11 injuries. Thus the area
analyzed experiences an average of approximately 10 accidents and 4
4
STORCH ENGINEERS
injuries per year. The analysis, showed that the majority of these
accidents did not involve angle collisions, while several were the
result of poor road conditions, operators driving under the influence,
and mechanical failure. There is not a high occurrence of accidents on
Buckland Road, between Smith Street and Deming Road, nor are there any
apparent safety deficiencies which contribute to accidents. The
accident rate on Buckland Road between Deming Road and Smith Street is
approximately 225 per hundred million vehicle miles travelled. This
rate is below average, therefore, indicating that the amount of traffic
r_ accidents currently occurring on Buckland Road is typical and even below
that rate which would be expected.
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon the trip generation characteristics of the subdivision,
a peak volume of 6 vehicles per hour is projected to exit from the site
onto Buckland Road. Storch Engineers conducted a traffic gap study
which showed that there are 164 gaps of adequate length in the Buckland
Road traffic during the critical period. Therefore, there are more than
adequate gaps in the Buckland Road traffic for motorists to exit safely
and conveniently from the site.
Adequate intersection sight distance exists at the site entrance.
There are no geometric problems on Buckland Road which result in
inadequate intersection sight distance.
An analysis of accident data yielded that there does not exist a
high occurrence of accidents based upon the traffic volumes on Buckland
Road.
5
A PP END I X
STORCH ENGINEERS
GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS
-- In order to clarify the meaning of certain specialized traffic
engineering terms used in this report, the following definitions are
offered:
Trip is a one-way movement to or from a site. One car entering and
leaving a site constitutes two trips.
Traffic Generation is the actual number of vehicle movements which
may reasonably be expected to be attracted by a specific development.
Usually, traffic generation is expressed as a number of trips.
Average Weekday Traffic is the total traffic generation of a
development on a typical working weekday.
Peak Hour Generation is the maximum traffic generation which may be
anticipated during the highest volume hour for the particular
development. This analysis parameter may vary as to the time of day,
depending on the type of facility proposed. Office buildings normally
generate peak volume rates which coincide with the peak volume rates of
the surrounding roadway network.
Trip Distribution is the process of determining the proportion of
the generated trips that can be expected to originate at any location.
Traffic Assignment is the process of estimating total traffic
volumes by assigning distribution from the various points of origin to
_ the roadway system which would provide the most direct route between the
points of origin and destination.
STORCH ENGINEERS
Capacity and Level of Service (LOS) are terms utilized to describe
the ability of a roadway to handle the volume of traffic that it
carries.
LOS is a measure of the quality of flow and overall congestion on a
particular section of road or at a specific intersection. LOS are
defined in the Highway Capacity Manual as follows:
LOS RATINGS
Rating Description Traffic
A Free Flow Drivers feel no restriction
B Stable Flow Drivers feel some restriction
C Stable Flow Drivers somewhat restricted
but not objectionably so
D Approaching
Unstable Flow Increasing restriction and
delays
E Capacity Substantial restriction and
delays
F Forced Flow Jammed condition, extreme
delays
LOS A through D are acceptable for intersections during peak
periods. LOS E and F are generally unacceptable.
STORCH ENGINEERS
MACHINE COUNT SUMMARY
PROJECT. . . . . . . . . . .
SO. WINDSOR JOB NO. . . . . . . . . . . . 4754
LOCATION. . . . . . . . . . BUCfLAND RD. TOWN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . SO. WINDS
COUNTER NO. . . . . . . . 8
DIRECTION. . . . . . . . . NORTHBOUND COMP- D BY. . . . . . . . .JPC
---------------------------------------------------------------
- MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
---------------------------------------------------------------
DATE 11/17 11/18 11/19
---------------------------------------------------------------
12-1 AM 60 55
1-2 AM 14 22
2-3 AM 17 15
3-4 AM 12 22
4-5 AM 21 20
5--6 AM 62 34
6-7 AM 279
7-8 AM 424
8-9 AM 295
9-10 AM 237
10-11 AM 283
11-12 AM 320 339
12-1 PM 370 342
1-2 PM 384 335
2-3 PM 443 431
3-4 FM 618 651 -
4-5 FM 771 757
5-6 PM 657 702
6-7 PM 465 452
7-8 PM 305 347
8-9 PM 284 305
9-10 PM 285 262
10-11 PM 103 156
11-12 FM 77 86
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL 5082 6869 168 D 0 0 0
COMMENTS Estimated Monthly ADT = 13638
SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES
Land Use/Building Type Sin&le-Family_Detached HousingITE Land Use Code 210
Independent Variable—Trips per Dwellin 'J i
Average Number Average Size of
Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent
Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies VariablelStudy
Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends
Peak A.M. Enter 0 .
— Hour Between Exit
of 7 and 9 Total0 . 3
Adjacent P.M. Enter
Street Between Exit 0. 37 1. 2 0. 1 76 2 2
Traffic 4 and 6 Total 1. 00 . 0 0. 4 233 2
77
Peak A.M. Enter 0 . 21 0 . 6 0 . 1 70 229
Hour Exit 0 . 55 1. 7 0 . 2
of Total0 . 4
Generator P.M. Enter
Exit 01. 2
Total
Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends ll
Peak Enter
Hour of Exit
Generator Total
Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends
Peak Enter
Hour of Exit
Generator Total
Source Numbers 8 12 14 16 1 . 202 21 24 2 6
1 8 00 10 108 114 11 11
6
ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates
Date:June 4 , 1975 , 1979 , Rev. 1982
______
AIUM$IE2 OF &APS
(y► iA I,S
0 �� I
l�b� �Tl� O U,4_Z> �� o -,-HBO 1/,'
w w
LL a Q 0 + '1111I 1,.1
0 0 / rill
a 1%I 11 %, If im IWill llllll +IIIIIII till ' Z II It►,IIIIII k, IIt III l,wI,t iillll /►t II I SO 69 13�
,--I I+II I I t+ it l It
3 i1111)llll l ( I I [1-I11lt+l I +I'I, ll+ 3 t' ( I III I Illlllll LllllII+I++I Ill til+►+tll till 11.1 111 1 +!l/
t l
\\ y (llllll 1 �1 Il,tll+tll tl + llll Ill t11 `1 11I►1IIIIl1.It1111111111111111t11 +Iftl ittl lltl �itll ( ll ►IJ 3a 66
�. 5- Iltlllllll t ►fill tlll1111111r"%\lt ,l !1tt .111111 It(
1Lt
6 I ►lI l lf+ 6 ', +I tall, ++I I I1111► 1 I11 I l l Il.l.11 l l l t l 1 1 $ ' 3g
t +
m ^ 7 +► , Ili+ 1 1,1,111111111 f l ll I I 6 ►g
W m � 8 Illt ' l � ,11111111 + llllll III11111 6 zz �
Y w �- 9 i� 1 + 1 ? Itt1►*� t l t l 3 9 -
w
° o /o Illllllll111-11`It1i1t1I + IIlllt,lll ;u ,111ltlll01111 Wit , ( fill. I Illt +ll
t
�a 111 'z �I ,11�1� 1111I I I 3LU
N
d O
O /y I t
O +
CA
Q
V �F-
y N
O��zN /]
CA U3
UJ
0
LLA
19
Z:°wv as
c� U-
W W al
= i
w Ld I' I
co~n 114- tt111.1lllll:1\I I it
I
I I I I I I ( 1 I I I l I 1 I I I I I
. l
f
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM
TO: Karl Reichle, Mike Gantick, Mel Stead,
Date:
Shaw,. ,
Richard J. Sartor, Chief Ryan, Fire Marshal-- -Zaiuiing
FROM: Marcia A. *Banach, Director of Planning
The Planning & Engineering Department have received plans for the
following project: L") p a2 �AJ - -
Subdivision Site Plan
Residential Commercial
Industrial
Location: ed S G S�-
Project Description: F".'le
Future Town-owned property involved? YES NO
(a) new streets ( existing frontage also)
(b) new open space/recreation area
active passive
(c) new detention area
Planning Department comments:
Please let me know by if you will have comments on
this application so thattcah follow up with your department.when I
do a Planning Department report.
at,-ij
�''�'`•Ocr.� _,I�'�.C•�IAy.---•'� fit.,,-- /j••-�� �-C.v !� —y...(�..;.._ �'•^^Z. . NJ`� �--- t--,,P• c.A.
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
fN�soR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
January 14 , 1987
John M. Casey, Esq.
25 Oakland Road
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Jack:
Re: App. #1213 - Ridgewood Estates (John Samsel)
Please be advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission voted
to accept the 65 day extension of time you granted in which to
take action in the above matter. The extension is from
February 19th to April 25th.
Yours very truly,
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Louise C. Evans, Chairman
vg
PATTERSON, rASEY, HALPERN, GRACE & DOMEIROWSKI, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
25 OAKLAND ROAD
SOUTH WINDSOR,CONNECTICUT 06074
[203)644-1528
RICHARD G.PATTERSON 185 S I LAS DEANE H I GHWAY
JOHN M.CASEY WETHERSRELO,CT 06109
KENNETH S.HALPERN [203)563-2B34
WILLIAM E.GRACE
JOHN W.DOMBROWSKI,JR.
WILLIAM K.WASSERMAN
APRIL C.TEVERIS
December 24, 1986
Town of South Windsor pEC of 19�6
Planning & Zoning Commission
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06 074 COUhbrrw,c"m�s��an
ATTENTION: MRS. VIRGINIA GRANEY
Re: Samsel Subdivision App.--Buckland Road
Dear Mrs. Graney:
In response to your request, John Samsel has asked
me to relay to you that he agrees with an extension of
65 days for the Planning & Zoning Commission to consider
the approval for the subdivision on Buckland Road.
Sincerely,
John,Iif.. Case
,f
JMC:led "
STORCH ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS !
PLANNERS-ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
161 MAIN STREET JA A� �r
WETHERSFIELD,CONNECTICUT 06109 �Y �[ 198-1
(203)529-7727
INLAND
e�
January 14, 1987 CONSERyATI pN co' AG�N�y�
41MISSIpN
Ms. Marcia Banach
Director of Planning
Town of South Windsor
Town Hall
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Subject: Supplemental Traffic Studies
John Samsel , Jr.
Application for Sub-Division
Buckland Road
South Windsor, Connecticut
Dear Ms. Banach:
As requested by Mr. Rick Martel , Storch Associates has conducted
additional studies regarding available gaps during the evening PM peak
period on Buckland Road.
Our initial study did not included this information as residential
sub-divisions normally do not exhibit major exiting traffic volumes
during the evening peak period (4:00 PM-6:00 PM) . The subject
sub-division would generate, during the period studied, approximately
four exiting vehicles trips, the cars wishing to enter Buckland Road
from the proposed sub-division. The available gaps which would be
acceptable under normal circumstances for vehicles to exit onto Buckland
Road numbered 97 during the same period. Thus, the accommodation of 4
vehicles should present no serious concern and save exiting from the
site can be made during the evening peak period.
We trust this supplemental information is sufficient for your needs.
Should further material or information be required, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
ORCH ASSOC TES___,,
�V i
ames W. Ford, P.E.
ssoc ate
JWF:mt
Wacr 4754
FLORHAM PARK WESTBURY BOSTON MANCHESTER PROVIDENCE
NEW JERSEY NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS NEW HAMPSHIRE RHODE ISLAND
5TORCH A550CIATES
TI.-I A 1:71:7 1:Cl V(:3 L 1.)M E' Si T U D Y
Gra.ph of Hourly Volujjjp�s:; -Var PIT 1, j.1- V(:)j.t.tjnr.!
Da.ta File 0:1.0 0 S 7 0 1. .TPF Position : 's
Station '75el .1 d e?11 t : 5
S t a r t D a t e 6 1967 l3ate : -..Jaxi 6 P1.987
Start Time 00 : 00 1*-:n d Ti in e : 2/1: 00
I...C)c m.ti o n BUCKLAND PIOAL) .2 Ml NOPTH 01:7 C..-)Ml:,T*l--1
..............................................
Ti tin f.--A C 0 U I'l t 0 200 /100 600 S
01 : 00 3 9
02 : 00 :1.6
03. : 0 0 1
OA : 00 1:1.
05 : 00 1.113 1
0 6 : 0 0 1.J.-1
07: 00 15195
01-3: 00 747
09: 00 -195
1.0 : 00 365
11 : 00 c302
12 : 00 32*7
1,21: 00 359
J.Aj : ()o a 0 E.)
15 : 00 378
16: 00 -41.5
17: 00 52-q
18 : 00 -'179
1.9: 00 363
2 0 : 0 0 235
21 : 00 1.52
22: 00 11.9
23: 00 F.
2-el: 00 71.
6452
------------
0 200 A00 600 Boo 1000
S T()P cl,1-4 A S S C)CI 1:A T EK S
A F*F'l C, V C)L.1.)M 11 S T 1.)1")Y
C7'ra.ph c)-P 1••lour"I.9 volulm..�s -Por F"T 1*):i.i-- volumc.1
D al t il F j.:1. 01.0 E)S 7 0:1. F'
F.')ti:i.rt Da-te Jam 6 1987 6 19(37
S ,art Ti in(.-i? 00 : 00 E:ri d 'T"i.in e 2/1 : 00
I C il t j.to Il IDUCKLAND POAD,22 WE NOPTIA OF* S)*T*PE:I:::T
IJ.in e C o u I'l t 0 200 leiUO 600 0 0 1.
...................................
01 : 00 61
0 2 00 1.19
03 00 :1.0
().el 0 0 1:1.
05 : 00 26
06 : 00 56
07 : 00 2/16
08 : 00 3:
09: 00 3OZ4
1.0 : 00 225
1 1 : 0 0 212
12: 00 286
13: 00 3:1.2
1..e1 : 00 1=1 19 9
15 : 00 lei()()
16 : 00 566
1.7 : 00
18 : 00 731.
19: 00 A39
20 : 00 '328
21 : 06 226
22 : 00 1.97
2 3: 0 0 1417 i *******
2-el : 00 97 *)V,**
Total 6-108
0 200 -e1 0 600 (300 1000
S T 0 VNI cl,I.-I (I'll S)C*)0 Cl 1.F*)-T.r.:
T P A F*F*1 C, V(31...UME STUDY
Cilraph of -P(:)r- Dir VL)I.Ltinf 1*1 r c) *:1 r a.In
File 01.0 0 G*7 0:1. . T P,F, P(:)s j.t J.c)ri 3
S t a t:L c)1.1 l 5/.1 1.1 t
S t M.I"t D il t e ..Ji:Lri 7 1 1907 E.I-)d 1)a t(.-..I Jaxl 1.907
S t a r t T j.in e 0 0 : 0 0 1:::1.)d Ti ill e 0 0
I...ci,c a.t J.c)I-) E4 U C,K I...AND POAD .2 Ml NOP411-1 SM11+1 STPlIE-ET
Ti in e C"a u 1.1 t q 200 /100 600 B 0 1. 0 0
...................... ...................— ......
01 : 00 '2 6 sK
02 : 00 1.()
03: 00 1.S
0 el 00 16
05 00 :1.2
06 : 00 :1.02
07: 00 517
0 8 : 0 0 777
09: 00 A66
1.0 : 00 31.7
.I.l : 60 30-1
1.2 : 00 -821.
:1..3: 00 363
I.Al: 00 'A 1.3
15: 00 343
1.6 : 00 SE33
17: 00 A90
18 : 00 449
1.9: 00 367
2 0 : 0 0 2.17
21 : 00 :1.81 i
22: 00 :1.1.2 *9<***
23: 00 E36
2-el: 00 60 1***
T c)t a 1. 6290
0 200 AOO 600 800 1000
S T()R Cl H A S S C)C',1:AT E s-
VOLUME STUDY
G,r;:i.p h c)T H c)u r:1.y V c):1.u in e s -P o r 1:',,'T' D j.r V c):1.u m Program
Diltil File 0:1.088,70:1. TPF
1 7 :1.9 S*7 E.ncl Datc--., : Jan 7 1987
Eiti: rt. Dilte Jill-I It
tart Ti in e 00 : 00 1:::11 d *TJ.in e : 2/1: 00
7
c) a.t J.c)1-1 I: U Cp K I...AND PIOAD .,22 Ma: OF SMITIA STREET
ia.1.1 e N
Ti in e C.,C)Lt I'l t O 200 -1100 600
..............................
Ol : 00 .3-1
02 : 00 225
0'3 0 0 1..1E.3
O-el 00 2-3
05 : 00 :1.6
06 : 00 59
07: 00 259
08: 00 393
0 9 : 0 0 264
10 : 00 220
11 : 00 273
1.2 : 00 326
1-3: 0 0 1319
1.4 : 00 -326
15 : 00 ell.6
1.6 : 00 605
17 : 00 709
18: 00 65E)
19: 00 -el52
2 0 : 0 0 355
21 : 00 26-1
22 : 00 206
23: 00 1.2-1
2,el : 00 79
T o t a 3. 6-167
0 200 AOO 600 800 1000
STORCH ENGINEERS/STORCH ASSOCIATES JOB y7Sy GEAJ2 :
161 Main Street SHEET NO OF
WETHERSFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06109
(203) 529-7727 CALCULATED BY�7 DATE 1 / 7 /-R 7
CHECKED BY DATE_
SCALE
P /Yi, Cr,�r� STv Svr►�N�ALvr
!�
3
Z Q6 yf' 9Z 60
3 186 113
l)z ss
C
zy Zs � 35' zg
7 29 2Z j 18 2-0
/8 Z7
.9 S' . /o ►z 6
/U z Z.. Z Z.
>�a 31, yy i 3-7 9 L/
I
I
I
&C[71 V
E United Stat s Soil 1101 K n ned y Road, Ro 1
Department of Conservation
q
A riculture Service W i ndsor, CT 06095
EI)
�• W/NpSOR P
TO: Denise Conk I i n9, District Manager February 26 NT� DEP�',
Hartford County Soil and Water Conservation District
FOR: South Windsor Inland Wetland Agency/Conservation Commission
FROM: J. Eric Scherer, District Conservat ion ist;'
USDA-So i I Conservation Serv_ -ce--- -
RE: Site Plan Review - !'I DGEWOOD ESTATES SU I VISION"
Buck I an uth Windsor, CT.
On February 24, 1987 a site plan review was made of the above proposal . Sheets
1 of 9 (12-9-86), 2 of 9 (10-22-86), 3 of 9 (12-12-86)0 4 $ 9 of 9 (12-11-86),
5 of 9 (12-9-86)0 6 8 7 of 9 (12-10-86), and 8 of 9 (12-13-86), were review d.
A copy of the report on the proposal from A. Bowen Davies, Deputy Town
Engineer, dated 12-29-86, was also reviewed.
Approximately 45% of the site is mapped as Inland Wetlands. The wetland soil
type mapped is Walpole loam. This soil has a high water table at or 1 .0 foot
below the surface for six to seven months of the year. This soil poses severe
limitations to development due to the high water table. These limitations
Involve houses with and without basements, roads and shallow excavations.
Special engineering and design will be needed to overcome the limitations.
In addition to the well-made comments by Mr. Davies, I would like to offer the
following recommendations to the plans if this proposed development is
approved:
If the proposed stormwater detention structure will handle the 100 year
storm event, will the 10 foot wide spillway proposed at elevation 153 be
necessary? If it is needed, suggest moving it from proposed location
over the pipe to another location where, if the embankment is breached,
the failure will not include the undermining of the primary structure.
It is important always to locate emergency spillways in natural ground,
as much as possible to reduce the erosion hazard and limit the complete
failure of the structure.
- It is assumed that the detention structure is being proposed to control
future storm runoff from the developed site. It appears that as
located, the basin will only control street runoff and runoff from half
of the lots. The hydrology analysis should take this into account.
- Include mulch specifications for permanent and temporary seedings as
well as for those periods when seeding cannot be done due to time of
year and when grading is substantially completed.
- Change the note (Sheet 8 of 9) on haybale detail to show a 411 depth
placement of haybal e.
- Change catch basin protection to show an "envelope" of synthetic fabric
under and over the grate and "tucked in" on the outside.
CC: B. Davies, Deputy Town Engineer
Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
OTh Soil Conservation S rvice
is an agency of the
Departm nt of Agriculture
`""714,
Hartford County Soil and Water Conservation District Inc.
1101 KENNEDY ROAD ROOM 105B WINDSOR, CT 06095 688-7725
February 27, 1987
Deborah L. Bellizzi
Secretary - IW A/CC
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT
Dear Deborah,
The enclosed reports on the "Ridgewood Estates Subdivision" were submitted to
me by Eric Scherer, USDA-Soil Conservation Service. The District concurs with
Eric's report and offers these additional comments/suggestions for your
consideration:
1 . Approximately 45% of the site is mapped as inland-wetlands. Six of the
twelve lots (Lot numbers 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 8 11 ) are almost entirely in
this wetland area. Also, the proposed road cuts through this area. The
towns wetland map indicates that the wetland on this parcel is part of
larger contiguous wetlands area. The construction of the road through
the wetlands coupled with the house lot development may disrupt the
continuity of the wetlands and impact their function.
2. The proposed plan shows two road stubs. This may be an indication of
plans for future development in the area. This would result in
disruption of more inland-wetlands.
3. The District supports the intentions and efforts of the South Windsor
Ag-land Preservation Commission. At the present, the land use on much
of the proposed site as well as on adjacent land is meadowland that is
being hayed. Both the Inland-Wetlands/Conservation Commission and the
Ag-land Preservation Commission may want to preserve this land for this
type of low impact use. This would reduce impact on wetlands, increase
open space and maintain the rural character of the town.
If you have any questions or concerns about these reports, please call me.
Sincerely,
01
Denise Conkling
District Manager
Enclosures
�A
7
WI'2, 014 S-0� ?d&U/44a)t
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
soR.c0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER THURSDAY , FEBRUARY 269 1987
THURSDAY , MARCH 5 , 1987
LEGAL NOTICE
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that there will be apublic hearing of the Planning
and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, March 1091987 , at 8 : 00 P . M. in the
Council Chambers of the South Windsor Town Hall , 1540 Sullivan Avenue ,
to consider the following:
1 . Application of John G. Samsel, Jr . , for a resubdivision of 12
lots located on the east side of Buckland Road , south of Deming
Street , as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals , Inc . ,
dated December 9 , 1986 , Proj . No . 86-118 , and Fuss & O 'Neill ,
dated 10-22-86 , Proj . No . 86-366 , AA-30 zone . (Ridgewood Estates)
2 . Application of Richard S . Kelley , for a site plan of development
for property located on the south side of Ellington Road , between
Clark Street and Buckland Road , known as the Town Shopping Center,
RC zone.
Copies of these applications and maps more clearly defining the
properties are on file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of
South Windsor . At this hearing, interested persons may appear and be
heard and written recommendations will be received .
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Louise C . Evans , Chairman
David H. Sorenson, Secretary
t N �44
~ Tiown � ?dbid4at
a
4 ti� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
ftid�R_ca�� AREA CODE 203/644-25U
March 10, 1987
John G. Samsel , Jr.
419 Buc•kland Road
South Windsor ,Ct 06074
Dear Mr . Samsel :
RE: Application #441 - Ridgewood Estates
At the March 9, 1987 meeting , the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission tabled your application for a 12 lot
single family subdivision to be located on the east side of Buckland
Road because they would like the site field delineated by a soil
scientist . Once this report is submitted the application will then
be placed on the following agenda for further discussion .
If you should have any questions , please feel free to Mr . Bo Davies ,
Deputy Town Engineer , 644-2511 Ext. 244 .
Very truly yours ,
Y
eth Warren , Vice-Chairman
Wetlands Agency/
vation Commission
Town of South Windsor
CC: A. B. Davies , Deputy Town Engineer
Richard Martel , Town Engineer
Marcia Banach, Director .of Planning
Michael Gantick , Director of Public Works
Design Professional Inc. /
Louise Evans , Chairman , Planning & Zoning., Commission v_
owN t,<�
U 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
oR-coy' AREA CODE 203/644-2511
May 22 , 1987
Hartford County Soil & Water
Conservation District
Midway Office Park
1101 Kennedy Road, Room 105B
Windsor, Ct 06095
Attn : Denise Conklin
Dear Denise:
Re: Application #441 - Ridgewood Estates
At the May 18, 1987 meeting of the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission the members had more questions and
concerns on the above mentioned project . In February your office did
a review of the plans , however , an on site field delineation was not
done by your office due to weather conditions at that time . The
Commission would like to request that your office do a field
examination of this property . They also were very concerned about
the competence and longevity of the drainage design along with the
impact this project would have on the overall wetlands in this area.
Attached are the plans for your review.
If you should have any questions , please don ' t hesitate to call
Debbie Bellizzi , the Commission' s Secretary , at 644-2511 Ext . 253 .
Very truly yours ,
—L
Elizab4th Warren , Vice-chairman
Inland Wetlands Agency/
Conservation Commission
EW: dlb
CC : A. B . Davies , Deputy Town Engineer
Richard Martel , Town Engineer
Marcia Banach , Director of Planning
Michael Gantick, Director of ublic Works
Thomas D' Auria , Building Off ' cial
Louise Evans , Chairman , PZC
John Samsel , Applicant
Hartford County Soil and Water Conservation District
1101 KENNEDY ROAD ROOM 105B WINDSOR, CT 06095 688-7725
T0: Elizabeth Warren, Vice-Chairman June 23, 1987
IWConservation Commission, South Windsor
FROM: Denise Conkling, District Manager Coaf-�
Hartford Soil and Water Conservation District
RE: ESTATES" - ITE AND PLAN REVIEW - SOUTH WIMSOR, CT.
The enclosed report was submitted to me by J. Eric Scherer, District
Conservationist, USDA--Soil Conservation Service. Along with Eric's report,
the following comments/suggestions are offered for your consideration:
1. The District is very concerned about the amount of development that
is planned in the wetland area. The wetlands on this parcel cannot
be looked at as a separate unit but as part of a larger contiguous
wetlands. The proposed development will disect the wetland area.
This would impact the wetlands off-site as well as on-site.
2. To support the type of development proposed, much filling and
draining of the wetlands is needed. The extensive draining that is
needed will most likely result in lowering the water table in
adjacent wetland areas as well as on-site.
3. Mr. Ianni described this wetlands as somewhat unique (page 3 of
report) inferring that because it did not have a deep organic layer
that it did not function like most wetlands. This wetland area is
not a unique system but is a coman wetland type found in the
Connecticut River Valley area. Often this type of wetland is
associated with an intensive aquifer recharge/discharge system.
4. As more and more of our wetland areas are developed, the importance
of the remaining areas we have grows.
5. According to State regulations, the commission must look at
alternatives to the proposal. Is development the only alternative
land use for this site? Can the proposed action be reversed or is
it an irretrievable commitment of the resource?
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about
these reports.
Enclosure: DC Report
CC: A.B. Davies, Deputy Town Engineer
Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
Peter DeMallie, Design Professionals, Inc.
P� United States Soil
Department of Conservation 1101 Kennedy Road, Room 105B
Agriculture Service Windsor, CT 06095
Phone: 688-7725
TO: Denise Conkling, District Manager June 23, 1987
Hartford County Soil and Water Conservation District
FOR: South Windsor Inland Wetlands/Conservation Commission
F": J. Eric Scherer, District Conservationist
USQA--Soil Conservation Service 61�
RE: SITE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR APPLICATION #441
KRMWA70 D ESTATES" - BLIC aAM ROAD, SOUTH Wn =R, Cr.
On June 19, 1987 a site visit was made to the above property. Site Plans,
Sheet 4 of 9 (dated 12-12-86 and revised 3-4-87) were reviewed. In addition,
"Soils Report" by John P. Ianni, Soil Scientist (dated April 1987) was
reviewed. An earlier report on the proposal, dated 3-24-87, was written by
this office. This report should be referred to for information. The
following information is offered for consideration:
- Inland Wetlands, at the scale mapped, appear to be correct.
- The Inland Wetlands are part of a larger contiguous wetland system
that runs north and south along Buckland Road. Although a divide in
the surface drainage occurs along the southern property line of the
property, ground water flows east to west with the general relief of
the area.
- The wetlands are dominated by Walpole loam (0-3 percent slopes) .
This soil consists of very deep, poorly drained sandy soils formed
in water-sorted glacial outwash and stratified drift. This soil has
a high water table at or near the surface much of the year. The
water table is apparent. Subsurface drainage on apparent water
tables is limited due to the nature of the water table.
- Glacial till soils predominate the upper relief to the area, acting
as a reservoir for replenishing the water table. Therefore,
attempts at drainage may prove to be difficult.
Additional Comments on Soil Report from J. Ianni:
-Response to III A. "Farmland Potential"
Walpole loam is best suited to grassland farming in the undrained
state. Agricultural drainage (depth of 2.0) will allow for corn
silage production (approx. 18 torVac) . High cash crops
(blueberries, strawberries, nursery stock) could become alternative
crops for the site.
OThe Soil Cons rvation Service
is an ag ncy of the
D partment of Agriculture
Additional Conments on Soil Report from J. Ianni - continued PAGE 2
6/23/87
-Response to III B. - "Limitations to Development"
Since Walpole loam has an apparent water table, the gravel and sand
subsoil will be saturated during those periods of the year when
drainage is important.
-Response to III C. - "Proposed Development in the Wetlands"
- During precipitation events, wetlands function to a limited extent
like sponges. The wetland soils ability to absorb water is based
upon the organic content and depth of the organic layer. During a
precipitation event where stormwater detention is important, wetland
soils are usually saturated, therefore, not acting like sponges
during the time of peak flows. The real value of wetlands is its'
value in reducing travel time of the peak as well as the storag of
water achieved by the low lying relief of wetlands. Wetland
vegetation also helps to reduce peak events from storms by resisting
flow (roughness coefficient) *
-Response to III C. - "Proposed Development in the Wetlands"
- Wetlands do function in pollution renovation. This is less a
groundwater, anaerobic function and more a biomass function. Unless
introduced by leachate, most pollutants that are treated by wetland
are surface water borne. Attenuation of the pollutant is by wetland
biomass, the more the biomass, the larger the attenuation of
pollutant.
2-
�-
0-/c S-0�,J� V&&,44,at
t
S
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINOSOR. CONN. 06074
�,yoi��, AREA CODE 203/644-2511
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL INQUIRER SATURDAY, JUNE 279 1987
LEGAL NOTICE
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
At the June 23, 1987 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted to take
the following action:
1. Approve, with modification, the application of Abby Road Associates, for
an Industrial Subdivision to be known as "South Windsor Business Center",
consisting of 10 lots, located on the south side of Ellington Road, I
Zone.
2. Approved the application of Wapping Fair Association, Inc. for a Temporary
and Conditional Permit at Rye St. Park on Sept. 12 and 13th.
03- Approved, with modification, the application of John Samsel, Jr. for a
Resubdivision of 12 lots located on the east side of Buckland Rd. , south
of Deming St. , as shown on plans prepared by Design Professionals, Inc. ,
dated Dec. 9, 1986, Proj . No. 86-118, and Fuss & O'Neill, dated 10-22-86,
Proj . No. 86-366, AA-30 Zone. (Ridgewood Estates).
4. Approved, with modifications, the application of East Hartford Sand & Gravel
for a Special Exception for Earth Removal of land located west of Strong Rd.
and east of KF Brick Co./Rt. 5, RR & I Zone.
Dated at South Windsor, Connecticut this 24th day of June, 1987.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Louise C. Evans, Chairman
Item 1 was approved by unanimous vote David H. Sorenson, Secretary
Of the Commission. Item 2 was approved
by a 6-0 vote. Voting in favor were
Evans, Castro, Klenke, Hallowell,
Montana (Hart) for Sorenson and Rossi
abstained. Item 3 was approved by a
6-0 vote. All voted in favor except
for Castro who abstained. Item 4 was
approved by a 6-0 vote. All voted in
favor except for Castro who opposed it.
r
Janis, . Getz
Recording Secretary
cv
��owM as+t�
col
0
w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
~�soR•Co�'� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
July 7 , 1987
Mr . John M. Casey , Esq.
25 Oakland Road
South Windsor , CT 06074
Re : Application #1213 - Ridgewood Estates (John Samsel)
Dear Mr . Casey :
Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on
June 23 , 1987 to approve your application for property located on
the east side of Buckland Road , south of Deming Street , as shown in
plans prepared by Design Professionals , dated 10/22/86, (revised
10/24/86) , project #86-366 , subject to the following :
1 . Plans shall be modified as follows :
a) Building lines for Lot 7 must be coincident with the
utility easement .
b) A note stating the site is not within the 100 year flood
zone .
c) A note requiring that driveways on Lots 6 and 7 be located
as far apart as possible ( to facilitate snow storage) .
d) The plot plan shall indicate the former lot lines for the
dwelling in Ridge Road and a note to indicate that the
properties are being combined .
e) An additional manhole between manholes # 8 and 9 are
needed .
f) The Town Engineer be given the latitude to require
underdrains for the roadway where site conditions warrant
it .
g) If approved , the Engineering Dept . will require quantity
estimates for the purpose of establishing a bond .
h) The Town is to have an easement to the inlet/outlet
structures and pipes of the detention basin.
i ) The 18" RCP that was originally shown between catch basins
7 and 8 , be removed from all the affected sheets .
2 . A decleration lane must be provided on the east side of
Buckland Road for vehicles approaching from the south .
3. Remaining property on Ridge Road must be provided with the
required frontage on Ridge Road through provision of a
Cul-de-sac .
4 . All Deeds for open space and roadways ; and Easements for
conservation purposes, drainage or utilities , that may be
required in connection with the approval of this subdivision ,
must be submitted to this Commission prior to filing the mylars
and issuance of building permits. All deeds must be in
accordance with the policy for accepting deeds and easements
and must be approved by the Engineering Department and Town
Attorney . The deeds for the roadways and open space will be
held in escrow until completion of the subdivision and then
referred to the Town Council for acceptance .
5 . Concrete sidewalks , built to Town specifications , shall be
installed on both sides fo the interior street .
6. Footing drains will be required for each house . Prior to the
building of any structure on a lot , a topographic map , drawn to
a scale of 1" = 40' , shall be submitted for each lot in the
subdivision , showing proposed contours , elevations and the
location of the footing drains . No building permits will be
issued until the proposed contours , floor elevations and
location of footing drains have been approved by the Town
Engineer.
7 . Drainage for this subdivision is subject to the approval of the
Town Engineer .
8. If , for any reason , finished grading and other site work is not
completed , the Town Engineer shall determine the amount of a
cash bond to ensure final grading and site work. This cash
bond must be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy .
9 . All lots must be connected to the Town of South Windsor
sanitary sewer system and are subject to the approval of the
Water Pollution Control Authority.
10. Water Company shall be determined by the Town Council .
11 . Street lighting shall be installed at intersections and on
cul-de-sacs in accordance with the policy established by the
Town Manager .
12 . Street names and locations of fire hydrants are subject to the
approval of the Fire Marshal of the Town of South Windsor .
Street names and supporting posts shall be installed by the
developer in conformance with the standards of the Town of
South Windsor , at no expense to the Town .
13 . Quantity estimates must be submitted to the Town Engineer for
the purpose of determining subdivision bonding , and all bonds
shall be posted prior to filing the plans .
In the event the Commission votes to accept a Letter of Credit
for a one year term, in lieu of a surety bond , said Letter of
Credit must be renewed on a yearly basis until cmpletion of the
development . If a new Letter of Credit has not been received
within 30 days before the expiration date , the Commission may,
at its option , call the Letter of Credit it is holding .
14. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of $600. 00 shall be
submitted to this Commission .
15 . A liability insurance policy shall be submitted to this
Commission naming the Town f South Windsor as an insured , with
a combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property
damage in the amount of $1 , 000 , 000.
16 . No building permits will be issued until all conditions of
approval have been complied with , and the final plans have been
filed in the Town Clerk' s Office .
17 . This approval is subject to the conditions of approval of the
Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission .
18. Prior to commencement of any site work, a meeting must be held
with Town Staff .
Black and white transparent mylars of Sheets # 1 and 3 with the
above modifications , together with two blueprint copies of the
entire set of plans , must be submitted to this Commission to be
stamped and signed . The letters of approval ofthis Commission , as
well as the Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission , must be
reproduced on the mylars .
After the mylars have been signed by the Commission , they will be
returned to you for filing in the Office of the Town Clerk.
Yours very truly ,
vg By:
Lo ise C . Evans , Chairman
CC : R. Martel , Town Engineer
T. D' Auria , Building Official
E . Belleville , Assessor
W. Lanning , Fire Marshal
M. Banach , Planning Director
Inland Wetlands Agency/Conservation Commission
101111
st+` .
r T-o ale S ?d&&,461at
C �
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
l��soR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
July 20, 1987
Mr. Peter DeMallie J
Design Professionals
491 Buckland Road 111
South Windsor, CT. 06074
Dear Mr. DeMallie:
On July 17, 1987, I sent you an approva'Vgltter f6r Ridgewood Estates:
Under the Town Engineering Department's conditidus fo roval of this
project, there is an error in item R. This should read: "The developer
can put the sewer in at the depth originally proposed."
Very truly yours,
Joseph J. arino, Chairman
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
Water Pollution Control Authority
JJC:pm
CC: Richard Martel, Town Engineer
Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
Louise Evans, Chairperson, Planning & Zoning
Thomas D'Auria, Building Inspector
tow" SEq
0
r 7_0 Ole ?Ozn�
C U
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
soe-corms AREA CODE 203/644-2511
July 17, 1987
-7>>�s,
Mr. Peter DeMallie
Design Professionals .fUI 1987
491 Buckland Road
South Windsor, CT. 06074 SOUth Wirld5or
Dear Mr. DeMallie: Planning & Zoning Commission
At a special meeting of the Water Pollution Contr l--Authority he- on
July 7, 1987, the Authority voted to approved Ridgewood Estates
Prepared for John Samsel by Design Professionals ---yroject -$6-118 -
Map Dated December, 1986 - Sheets 1-9, with the understanding that the
developer can negotiate with the property owners on Buckland Road to
connect to the system, subject to the approval of the Town Attorney
that the developer has the right to do so. If the Town Attorney says
there are complications in the developer doing this, this does not
destroy the approval of the W. P. C. A. accepting the plan of Ridgewood
Estates. It still entitles the developer to put the sewer in the road.
This approval is also subject to the following 'conditions of the
W. P. C. A. as follows:
1. Houses won't be permitted to connect to the sewer until
they have been air tested.
2. Any connections will become part of the plan.
3. Once we accept the line, property owners are subject
to be assessed under the Town's rules and regulations.
4. The developer will provide as-built plans showing
people connected to the sewer.
This approval is also subject to the following Town Engineering Department
conditions as follows:
1. The developer can't put in the sewer at the depth
originally proposed. The Town recommends a 10 inch
sewer line instead of an 8 inch line.
2. Additional manhole must be placed between Manhole #8 and
Manhole #9.
3. The line must be 10 inches in diameter from Station 0
plus 0 through 1452.
(Cont'd on page 2.)
SOW N SE,
-OW� Ole S-C�a� ?d&&4j6'0t
o �
C V
wG 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
sOR-CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511
-2-
4. The capped Tee's or Wyes should be supplied to existing
structures with consideration given to full laterals
to existing houses.
5. The developer is given the option of placing the sewer in
Buckland Road, either the center or the travel lane.
6. Construction activities are to be limited to non peak
times of the day.
7. The Town Engineering Staff recommends that test borings
bd taken to determine soil conditions.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Fred Shaw at
644-2511, extension 247.
Very truly yours,
4z� 2r�Z
Joseph J. C6 ino, Chairman
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
Water Pollution Control Authority
JJC:pm
CC: Mr. Richard Martel, Town Engineer
Ms. Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
Mrs. Louise Evans, Chairperson, Planning & Zoning
Mr. Thomas D'Auria, Building Inspector
{
i v
~N d t,
C r O-PS_0t12%
15.
c.>
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
tipsoR.co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
August 10, 1987
Mr . John G. Samsel , Jr. CERTIFIED MAIL
419 Buckland Road
South Windsor , Ct 06074
Dear Mr . Samsel :
RE: Application #441 - Ridgewood Estates
At the July 20, 1987 meeting , the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission approved with conditions application
#4419 7 out of the 11 lot subdivision located on the east side of
Buckland Road , south of Deming Street , as shown on plans prepared by
Design Professionals Inc . , dated 12/9/86, revised 3/4/87 , consisting
of 9 pages . The following conditions must be adhered to for this
permit to be valid :
1 . The plan must be modified showing the elimination of lots# 39, 499,
& 10 as non-approved lots .
2 . The plan must be modified to show limiting the roadway excavation
to a 60' width or strip in both the cuts and fills . All driving
to be limited within that 60 ' area to minimize dust and erosion
control for the developer.
3. The first 200' of Ridgewood Road must be brought up to a subgrade
as soon as possible to permit lots 1 & 12 to function as an
emergency siltation basin during construction and to keep the mud
off Buckland road.
4. The temporary vegetation cover should be expanded to cover time
from disturbance to seeding - 1 to 2 weeks .
5. This project would be candidate for Town Engineer inspections
between construction phases .
6. Typical house construction plan shown to include the stockpile
treatment and some access pad to keep the mud off the street .
7 . No curtain drains on the east side of lots 5 & 8 which abut the
lots being eliminated .
To: John G. Samsel
Re: Ridgewood Estates
Date : August 10, 1987
Page 2
7. We recommend a bond in the amount of $10 , 000 be submitted to the
Planning & Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with erosion &
sediment control measures .
8 . Three (3) blueprint copies of the approved map with all
modifications must be submitted to the Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission prior to commencement of any site
work.
9. Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the
Town Engineer .
10. The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of
South Windsor against any liability which might result from the
proposed operation or use .
11 . The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on July 20,
1988.
Very truly yours ,
Eli :ab 01h Warren , Vice- hairman
Inla Wetlands Agency/
ConsArvation Commission
Town of South Windsor
CC: A . B . Davies , Deputy Town Engineer
Richard Martel , Town Engineer
Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
Michael Gantick , Director of Public Works
Thomas D' Auria , Building Official
Louise Evans , Chairman , PZC
Design Professionals Inc .
Attorney John Casey
owN sE,4
r 014e S qdzn�
C �
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
f�osoR•co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
June 22, 1988
John G. Samsel, Jr. � •
419 Bucklad Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
R : Application #441: 12 lot single-family subdivision
Dear Sir:
At the June 20, 1988 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission approved a one year extension of
Application #441 with all original conditions.
The application becomes effective July 20, 1988 and expires July
20, 1989 .
Very truly yours,
I 'Lv I)ti . I
ohn M. Moran Jr. Chairman
Inland Wetlands Agency/
Conservation Commission
JMMJr. ,/pmm
cc:A.B.Davies, Deputy Town Engineer
Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
Michael Gantick, Director of Public Works
John R. Collins, Chief Building Official
Raymond Hallowell, Chairman, PZC
041
E' •
w� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR• CONN. 06074
r�psOR-co� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
May 10, 1989k� -°
John Samsel, Jr.
419 Buckland Street Nmy I o 1989
South Windsor, CT 06074
South Windsor
Re: Application #441 - Ridgewood Estates Planning & Zoning Commission
Dear Mr. Samsel:
At the May 8, 1989 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission approved a one year extension of
Application #441 with all original conditions.
In addition to the original conditions you are also required to
contact John McCahill, Zoning/Wetlands Enforcement Officer (644-
2511, x229) immediately upon approval notification. This is to re-
con fi rm the contact person for the site and establish a site vi si t
with that person to verify all erosion and sedimentation control
measures are in place according to the plan.
Application #441 becomes effective July 20, 1989 and expires on
July 20, 1990.
;ohn
ry truly yours,
f4
M. Moran, Jr. , C irman
Inland Wetlands Agen /
Conservation Commission
immir. /pmm
cc:John E. McCahi l l, Zoning/Wet1 ands Enforcement Officer
Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
John R. Collins, Chief Building Official
Raymond Hallowell, Chairman, PZC✓
Jerry Iazzetta, Town Engineer
Enclosure
C �
s 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
OR•Co�'�w AREA CODE 203/644-2511
May 12, 1992
CERTIFIED MAIL
John G. Samsel, Jr.
99 Ridge Road
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Samsel:
Re: Application #92-441, Ridgewood Estates
At the May 11, 1992 meeting of the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission, the approval motion for this
application did not carry and the motion failed. This results in
a denied application.
You may, at your convenience, reapply to the Commission with
additional information and/or changes.
Very truly yours,
i
Eli abeth A. Warren, Chairman
In and Wetlands Agency/
Conservation Commission
EAW/pmm
cc: Director of Planning
Director of Public Works
Chief Building Official
Planning & Zoning Commission
Town Engineer