HomeMy WebLinkAboutSITE PLAN (26) TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CEP 17 1987
APPLICATION FORM
.y� South V;1n0S01`
App. No. 13 Plannmg & jnninp o mission
Date Received: 7 /5 • IMPORTANT!
Action or Public Hearing By:
/ � �8. Planning and Engineering Department staff
require 14 days to determine application
Receipt NO. completeness. To ensure receipt of a
complete application by PZC, it is strongly
recommended that the application be submitted
14 days prior to the Regular Meeting at which
it will be received.
APPLICANT: METALS TESTING CO. , INC .
ADDRESS: 570 SULLIVAN P. O. BOX 213 TELEPHONE: 289-8225
OWNER OF RECORD ON LAND RECORDS: SAME/ C/O BOB DELISLE
ADDRESS:
COMPLETE LOCATION OF PROPERTY: MYETTE INDUSTRIAL SUBDTVTSTON nN IHF NORI
SIDE OF SULLIVAN AVE. 1450 FEET WEST OF WEST RD. ZONE: T
NAME, ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO WHOM INQUIRIES SHOULD BE
DIRECTED:
CHRISTOPHER STONE C/O FUSS & O ' NEILL, INC.
210 MAIN ST. , MANCHESTER, CT. 06040 TELEPHONE•646-2469
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (Check one of the following)
1. Zone Change to (public hearing required)
2. Subdivision
3. Open Space Subdivision (public hearing required)
4. Resubdivision (public hearing required)
5. Special Exception to Article (public hearing required)
XX 6. Site Plan of Development
7. Earth Filling '(Section 10) and/or Earth Removal (Section 9 )
(public hearing required)
8. General Plan of Development
9 . Regulation Amendment: Zoning Subdivision
10. Other (explain in detail)
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
AND SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICAT WITH SIX SETS OF THE MAPS (7 if public hearing
is requi END OT R ENTS (see page 2)
Applica Owner
1/14/87 (see reverse side)
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPLICATION FORM
This application is complete and ready for Planning & Zoning Commission
receipt only upon submission of all required documentation, including,
but not necessarily limited to, the following items. Not all items are
required with every application. See applicable sections of the South
WLndsor zoning and subdivision regulations for specific requirements.
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
X 1. Key Map
X 2. Architectural Elevations/Floor Plans
X 3. Completed application form (in triplicate)
X 4. Required fees
X 5. Zone Change, Site Plan, Subdivision, Open Space Improve-
ment, and/or General Plan of Development maps, in accordance
with regulations. (Six sets - seven if public hearing required)
N/A 6. Plans & Profiles/Drainage Calculations
X 7. Conservation Plan
X 8. Landscaping Plan
N/A 9 . Traffic Engineering Report
X 10. Narrative Statement
N/_A 11. Sanitary Report
N/A 12. Copy of agreement to purchase land (if not the owner)
13 . Other
ALL PROSPECTIVE APPLICANTS ARE URGED TO CONFER WITH TOWN PLANNING
DEPARTMENT AND ENGINEERING BUREAU STAFF PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY
APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSION.
CONSULT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR FEE SCHEDULE.
1/14/87
ffo
FUSS8"NEILL
13 November 1987
consulting engineers RECEIVED '
Wv a V 1981
Marcia Banach 304 WINDSOR PLANP4lNG DEPr,
Town Planner `
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re: Metals TestincJ. Site Plan Application
Dear Marcia:
As agent for the above referenced applicant I am writing per our
conversation of November 13 to confirm with you the status of
this application. I understand that due to changes in the
application it will not be considered to be officially received
until we submit revised plans to you. Only at this point will
the 65 day time constraint begin.
We foresee submission of these revised plans very shortly. If
you have any questions please feel free to contact me. We
appreciate your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
Christopher 0. Stone, P.E.
/kt
87-385/Correspondence
1113ACOS. 1
210 MAIN STREET / MANCHESTER, CONN. 06040 / TELEPHONE (203)646-2469
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT*WASTE WATER SYSTEMS o EROSION CONTROL o WATER SYSTEMS o HYDROLOGY and DRAINAGE SYSTEMS o SITE PLANNING
HIGHWAYS and BRIDGES o SURVEYING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC 9 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT 9 HYDROGEOLOGY
PREPARED BY: DATE: /L
/ r�,� FUSS&O•NdL.L I
G D IZ J� MANCHESTER. CONNCTICUT SH. NO. OF
� E
CHECKED BY. DATE: PROJ NO
GUTTER FLOW ANALYSIS -1 iN (Sr TOWN _
Al Entering Catch
Basin
Al By-nassing Inlet Q 61)
D Bypassing Inlet Q
U i dth of Flow
Depth of Flow
at gutter
Cross Slope of I
Shoulder
Grade of Gutter I I
9 to Inlet M cn
I
Rainfall In-tensity
Total Al `c
Sum of Al I
Al r.
p O
Runoff Coefficient
on ,�
Area in Acres
O p p
Time to Inlet
A
Inlet Number
l.t-r':,HtU by. uni t. FUSS&O'NEILL SH- NO. OF
0
12- Z O� YANCNESTEPt. CONNECTICUT
CHECKED BY: DATE: DROJ.NO.
STORtvI SEWER SYSTEM TOWN
DESIGN 'I�77,,�--S `Ta5TI r4 (T 5,ICJ lNL e-
M
' No
HEADWATER I
FULL CAPACITY `J
AVERAGE VELOCITY
SLOPE 0
O
O
LENGTH OF PIPE - I -
PIPE SIZE
0 1N SYSTEM N
M
RAINFALL INTE14SI Y-,:
SUM OF Al IN �
SYSTEM
d
Al ENTERING
CATCH SASIN
O
ACCUMULATED TIME
Til•:E IN PIPE
0
T I t.:E TO INLET
LINE SEGMENT i�
FUSS&O'NEILL PREPARED DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT N
O consulting engineers BY BY
SHEET NO
r ,
/.o��
i
- - - -A
- 73
_j
a
s �
-J
rt -
i
i
y i l
REQUIRED INFORMATION
SITE PLANS
This checklist must be signed by plan preparer (P.E. /L.S . ) declaring
that all required information is provided . Items 1-7 are required
for all applications ; items 8-11 required where appropriate .
Check mark for each item supplies .
X1 . On each sheet for plans or maps, title block with the
following information :
X a. Name , address and telephone of applicant .
b . Name, address and telephone number of Land Surveyor
or Professional Engineer.
C. Name of Development.
X d. Date when drawings were made.
_ 2. Key Map: An overall map drawn to a scale of 1 inch
equals 200 feet , which can be used as an overlay on
Metropolitan District Maps. This map will show the
overall design of the Development and surrounding
property within 500 feet.
x a. Data block which gives needed zoning information
such as percentage of lot coverage, acreage of
tract, number of apartment units, parking
requirements, etc.
b. Layout of buildings
_X C. Layout of streets and parking.
X d. Lines indicating proposed drainage system with
direction arrows.
Xe. Lines indicating sanitary sewer system with
direction arrows.
X_ f . Names of surrounding property owners.
Zg . Proposed open spaces and recreation areas.
_X h. Driveway cuts on surrounding properties .
X 3. Architectural Elevations: Plans of the proposed
buildings drawn to a scale of 1/8" = 1 ' - 0" showing
the elevations of all sides of the proposed buildings
in sufficient detail to show architectural styling .
C Architect ' s seal on elevations for buildings in excess
of 5000 square feet ( per CGS Chapter 390) .
2 (Si Le PIJII;; )
4 . Plot Plan : A layout map of the proposed site drawn to
a scale of 1 inch equals 40 feet on either of the
following size sheets: ( 1 ) 24" X 36" with a 3/4" ruled
margin ; ( 2) 18" X 24" with a 1/2" ruled margin ,
containing the following data:
a. Distance and bearings of all boundary lines and
acreage of site . Iron pins required at all
property angle points and shown on map.
_ b . Proposed streets and street lines with center line
stations , curve data, and parking spaces .
_ C . Building lines in accordance with zoning
regulations.
d. Proposed buildings and other structures, including
signs , outside lighting , and dumpsters (on concrete
pad and screened)
e. Easements, noting grantors, grantees, and purpose.
f . Names of abutting property owners.
g . Monuments will be indicated at corners and angles
of all streets and at all points of curvature and
tangency. In areas accessible to Metropolitan
District Commission points , or other coordinated
points , the monumented points within proposed site
shall be coordinated. These coordinates shall
appear in tabular form on the plot plan. The
accessibility of these MDC points shall be
determined by the Town Engineer.
h. All open space or other common or public land uses
shall be indicated.
_ i . A-2 certification; P.E. /L.S. Seal.
S. Topographic Map: A map drawn to a scale of 1 inch to
40 feet on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches ,
including ruled margins shall in addition to the
requirements of the plot plans show the following :
_ a. All existing and proposed buildings.
b . Curb lines and pavement width, sidewalks.
C . Existing and proposed sanitary sewers .
_ d. Existing and proposed water and gas main systems.
e . Present wooded area indicated by foliage lines .
Any individual trees to be saved should be shown.
f . Existing and proposed contours shall be shown in
not less than two-foot intervals , but in cases of
relatively level land , the contours shall be
one-foot intervals and spot elevations .
g . Regulated wetlands and 100-year floodplain or note
that none are present .
h. Proposed storm drainage system, showing all catch
basins , endwalls , manholes , lengths and sizes of
pipes. (Minimum distance between catch basins
shall be 300 feet and minimum size of storm drain
lines shall be 15 inches . )
i. Connections of all springs into proposed storm
drainage system as needed.
j . Location and indications of existing brook
channels, and 100-year flood limits.
k. A-2 Certification; P.E. /L.S, Seal .
_ 6. Landscaping plan.
7. Drainage calculations - Zero Runoff Increase per
attached guidelines. .
8. Traffic report .
9. Plans and Profiles: A plan and profile of the proposed
�reviULAs streets drawn on plan/profile paper of scales 1 inch to
�PQrcvti` 40 feet horizontally, and 1 inch to 4 feet vertically
on sheets not exceeding 24 inches by 36 inches,
including ruled margins and containing the following:
a. Layout of streets in sections coordinated by
stations with the profile.
b. Street plan showing roadways and drainage.
C. Sight line at driveway & street intersections.
d. Profile of roadway showing existing and finished
grades . Roadway profile will show all tangent
grade and all vertical curve information.
e. Profile will show all catch basins and all drainage
lines between catch basins with all invert and top
of frame elevations. Drainage lines will be shown
and described as to material .
f . Where any storm drainage line discharges into an
existing brook sufficient profile of this brook
will be shown to determine conditions.
g . Metropolitan District Commission datum shall be
used on all sites accessible to these controls .
The Town Engineer shall , based on standard
engineering practices , determine the accessibility
of these controls .
I'i cal i lc:; Ii;il l :J,ow .111 sanitary scwci l j nes and
manholes , including elevations , sizes , lengths , and
slopes of pipes . Top of foundation elevations for
building shall be shown .
10. Open Space Site Improvement Plans: For sites which
require or include a provision for open spaces , a plan
which contains data for site improvement may be
required . This map shall be drawn to a scale of 1 inch
equals 40 feet.
11 . Sanitary Report: Where individual sanitary sewage
disposal systems are proposed, the final plans shall
include a Sanitary Report certified by a Professional
Engineer . The report shall demonstrate the feasibility
of the proposed individual systems; the report should
deal with the area as a whole, discussing the following
points :
a. General nature and development of surrounding area.
b. Topography and natural drainage pattern.
C. Subsurface conditions as shown by subsurface
investigation, including soil absorption
characteristics, ground water level conditions,
ledge rock, and general nature of soil.
d . General description of type of development
contemplated.
e. Detailed description of proposed sanitary sewage
disposal facilities, indicating sizes for various
ground conditions, materials to be used, and the
general layout pattern to be used, etc.
f . Special precautions that may be necessary to
provide proper functioning of the proposed disposal
systems.
g . Map of general area with locations of all tests
shown on proposed layout.
h. Flood heights of any nearby streams, brooks, or
rivers .
i. Test results and engineering evaluation per Section
4. 13 . 5.
All information required above is included in this application at the
time of submission .
PLAN PREPARER (P . E. /L. S . ) DATE
November , 1987
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN-HOUSE REFERRAL FORM
TO: Karl Fbeichle, Mike Gantidc, Mel Stead, Shaw Date:
Richard J. Sar'tor, Gary Tyler, Fire , John Shemo
FROM: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
Th Planning & Engineering Departments have received plans for the
following project: /�' 3 S TT.:�r-�r 1 sc
Subdivision Site Plan
Residential Commercial
Industrial
Location: ��� s , c� � S�- ( �� ��~1 ��`� Yij
Project Description: -, ��l SZ, s y✓ f
Future Town-owned property involved? YES NO
(a) new streets ( existing frontage also)
(b) new open space/recreation area
active passive
(c) new detention area
Planning Department comments :
Please let me know by /�3 i �� if you will have comments on
this application so that I can follow up with your department when I
do a Planning Department report.
�lil✓{� mil e:�.t tH-/ 5 Tito' c/ G�p-�S Gt°"'�I o n
[iJ /�-e�w (-2 i T 'P✓�` a``� vc d" a c_e.4S
To-wn- Ole S-11au./V7, ?dze2�
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WINDSOR. CONN. 06074
SOR-CO AREA CODE 203/644-2511
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
FROM: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works
DATE: January 25 , 1988
RE: ENGINEERING REVIEW
METALS TESTING, INC.
SULLIVAN AVENUE
Please find attached for your information the SEA Engineering
Review report. In addition, the following points are noteworthy:
1 . The subject plans note numerous items as "By Others" (B.O. )
which are critical to the development of the proposed site, such
0 as ; drainage system piping, road, sanitary sewer, sanitary sewer
t lateral to proposed building, etc. It is unacceptable to this
to as presented with
'Pepartment approve the proposed site plan
proposed improvements critical to the development of this site
noted ,as A.�,"By Others " .
4
_ ,12 . The proposed road would have to be constructed along the
,., , �entire front of Lot 3 with a temporary cul-de-sac.
3 . There is insufficient information provided to fully evaluate
the proposed site, specifically; a) topo along Miller and Perra
mperties, b) hydraulic data for site, jDc location of roof
eaders and underdrains , d typical cross-section of swale with
-i,')materials of construction, paved leak off details, 0 pro-
tection of vehicles along s�rale, LM sanitary sewer bedding
details, [D drain, sewer pipe/system profile plans I dumpste
pad, retaining wall de ls , concrete walk,, [N. Catch
0 t ,
' basin and manhole details , parking lot entrance radius, n)
loading dock drainage detai0s, M road profile data, [M road
geometry detail, GQ road material of construction detail, 0
parking lot spot elevations and other associated information .
4 . Soil conditions along the proposed road and propysed site ar
I
poorly suited for road development . Specia design -is required
to address soil and groundwater conditions .
�4owM of+<�
o Z)
c
m �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
Soe•c0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning
FROM: Michael J. Gantick, Director of Public Works
DATE: January 25, 1988
RE: ENGINEERING REVIEW
METALS TESTING, INC.
SULLIVAN AVENUE
Please find attached for your information the SEA Engineering
Review report. In addition, the following points are noteworthy:
1 . The subject plans note numerous items as "By Others" (B.O. )
which are critical to the development of the proposed site, such
as; drainage system pipincj, road, sanitary sewer, sanitary sewer
lateral to proposed bbuilding, etc. It is unacceptable to this
Department to approve the proposed site plan as presented with
proposed improvements critical to the development of this site
noted as "By Others" .
2 . The proposed road would have to be constructed along the
entire front of Lot 3 with a temporary cul-de-sac .
3 . There is insufficient information provided to fully evaluate
the proposed site, specifically; a) topo along Miller and Perras
properties, b) hydraulic data for site, c) location of roof
leaders and underdrains, d) typical cross-section of swale with
materials of construction, e) paved leak off details, f ) pro-
tection of vehicles along swale, g) sanitary sewer bedding
details, h) drain, sewer pipe/system profile plans, i ) dumpster
pad, j ) retaining wall details, k) . concrete walk, 1) catch
basin and manhole details, m) parking lot entrance radius, n)
loading dock drainage details, o) road profile data, p) road
geometry detail, q) road material of construction detail, r)
parking lot spot elevations and other associated information.
4 . Soil conditions along the proposed road and proposed site are
poorly suited for road development. Special design is required
to address soil and groundwater conditions .
TO: Marcia A. Banach, Director of Planning Page 2
RE: Metals Testing, Inc.
5 . This Department questions the viability of the mote design
for drainage. The Town will not accept the drainage swale as a
Town drainage easement.
6 . The proposed Canadian Hemlocks (B.O. ) long the Perras
property are not to be located within the road R.O.W. .
7 . Plan needed for maintenance of flow during construction of
tie-in to sanitary sewer on Sullivan Avenue. Detail of
construction needed also.
8 . The certification note on sheet 2 of 3 is not consistent with
the State of Connecticut Consumer Protection Board of
Professional Engineers certification.
9 . Approval notes regarding construction and grading appear to
be unnecessary as part of site plan submittal . Existing and
proposed conditions should be noted and detailed.
The above noted items and the SEA review report contain the major
areas of concern by this Department regarding the proposed
project.
This Department would recommend that no action be taken by the
Planning and Zoning Commission until such time as the noted
concerns have been addressed.
Should you have any questions regarding the above matters, please
contact me.
MJG/jsv
cc: Engineering Department File
P&ZC Correspondence File
SEA Consultants Inc. January 8, 1988
Engineers/Architects
Principals
Arnold B Goldstein,PE
Frederick G Auhero,PE Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E. -� ✓
Robert M Brandon,A I A Director of Public Works
Stephen H Geri bo,PE TOWR of South Windsor
David T Goodemote,PE ,, � N
Bruce E Soule.PE 1540 Sullivan Avenue
Kenneth M Stewart,PE South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 r«
Anthony Zuena,PE „,
� co
Associates Re: Metals Testing, Inc.
Steven L Bernstein,PE Job No. 288-8731
Paul F Gabriel,RE Mark Gould,RETask Order No. 13 9
Michael S.Schultz,PE
Arthur Spruch,PE Dear Mr. Gantick:
Paul C Ross,RE
As requested, S E A Consultants Inc. has reviewed the following
for the above referenced project:
Sheet No. Title Prepared By Date
1 of 3 Plot Plan Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. 8-18-87
2 of 3 Site Plan " 8-18-87
3 of 3 Details " 8-18-87
A-1 Floor Plan Orlando Annulli
and Sons, Inc 9-15-87
A-2 Elevations it 9-15-87
- Storm Drainage Fuss & O'Neill, Inc.
Calculations 12-2-87
This information was reviewed for compliance with the Town of
South Windsor Subdivision and Zoning Regulations dated July 24,
1972 and standard engineering practice. We note the following:
Section 4.13.2.1 KEY MAP
An individual Key Map has not been provided. However, a Location
Map (Scale 111 = 2001) has been included on the Plot Plan.
Section 4.13.2.3 PLOT PLAN
d) The proposed building including signs and outside lighting
should be shown on the plan.
850 Silas Deane Highway
Wethersfield,CT 06109-3412 e) Drainage easements should be labeled existing and/or
(203)721-7993 proposed, dimensioned and grantor and/or grantee noted.
485 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge,MA 02139-4018
(617)497-7800
Citicorp Park West
100 Road Sou — ---
Southh Port Portland,ME 04106-2319
(207)775-2281
Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E.
S E A Consultants Inc. January 8, 1988
Engineers/Architects Page Two
g) All monumented points within the proposed site shall
be coordinated and listed in tabular form on the plan.
Section 4.13.2.4 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
b) Curbing (by others) should be labeled along the proposed
road.
j) The plan should be titled "Topographic Map."
Section 4.13.6 CONSERVATION PLAN
Although sedimentation and erosion control measures are shown on
the site plan, an individual conservation plan of the site has not
been provided.
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. The data block is shown on the site plan. This information
including the zone designation should be indicated on the plot
plan.
2. Storm drainage design calculations have not been provided
for the 15" R.C.P. (by others) along the north boundary of
the site and for the 1511 R.C.P. across the proposed road
outletting into the drainage swale. It is recommended that
this 1511 R.C.P. be directed into catch basin No. 4.
3. The engineer has not provided design calculations for the
proposed drainage Swale. The design should include outlet
flows from the future detention basin (by others). Channel
velocities should be calculated to determine if riprap
protection will be required at the bends of the swale.
4. The Town requires a minimum 1511 diameter for all storm
collection pipes. The proposed inlet pipe (12" R.C.P. by
others) to catch basin No. 6 should be increased.
5. A cross section of the drainage swale should be provided.
Temporary and permanent channel linings should be included.
6. Roof drains for the proposed building should be shown on the
plan.
Mr. Michael J. Gantick, P.E.
January 8, 1988
E E Consultants Inc. Page Three
Engineers/Architects
7. The word "course" is misspelled in the typical pavement
section of the details sheet.
8. The floor plan indicates an "acid pit" to be located within
the facility. What will its purpose be and how will its use
impact environmental concerns?
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Very truly yours,
S E A Consultants Inc.
James R. Bancroft, P.E.
JRB:emf
Town 0
y 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
h/hpy.OR co AREA CODE 203/644-2511
January 29, 1988
Chris Stone
Fuss & O'Neill, Inc.
210 Main Street
Manchester, Ct. 06040
RE: Application #1326, Metals Testing Co. , Inc.
Dear Chris:
Attached is a copy of comments from the Planning and Engineering
Departments regarding the above-referenced application. Please make
the necessary revisions to the plans and submit 6 complete sets to
the Planning Department. Your application will be scheduled on a
Planning and Zoning Commission agenda as soon as possible after we
receive revised plans.
If you have any questions regarding the comments or the procedure,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
��L(%2 C-C-GL lZi2t-rl
Marcia A. Banach
Director of Planning
MAB/pmm
VIP
�,� 0-ye sow 2v.
ti4 �v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
���soe•c0 AREA CODE 203/644-2511
February 10, 1988
Attorney Harold R .Cummings
Attorney Michael J. Lanza
1665 Ellington Road
South Windsor, CT. 06074
Gentlemen:
RE: Application #521
At the February 8, 1988 meeting the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency/Conservation Commission approved with conditions Application #521 ,
for constructing a 2500 sq. ft. addition to and renovation of existing
house for professional offices and a 24 space parking lot as shown on
plans prepared by AR Lombardi Associates , Inc . dated 10/29/87 , consisting
of three pages . The following conditions must be adhered to for this
permit to be valid:
1 . Modify the drawings to show the wetland limits .
2 . Change the slope of the parking lot so that it doesn ' t disturb
the wetlands and culvert. Grade to drain to the west .
3. Modify the plans to show how the well is to be abandoned , boards,
concrete, etc .
4. We recommend a bond in the amount of $2500. 00 be submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Commission to ensure compliance with erosion
and sediment control measures .
5. Three (3) blueprint copies of the approved map with all
modifications must be submitted to the IWA/CC within 65 days for
review.
••its ii'.` 7,
6. Construction activities shall be subject to the approval of the
Town Engineer.
7 . The application shall indemnify and hold harmless the Town of
South Windsor against any liability which might result from the
proposed operation or use .
8. The permit is valid for one year and shall expire on February 8,
1989.
Very truly yours,
/ John M. Moran ,Jr .
L/ Chairman
Inland/Wetlands Agency
Conservation Commission
Town of South Windsor
JMM,Jr. /pmm
cc : A .B.Davies , Deputy Town Engineer
Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
Michael Gentick, Director of Public Works
Thomas D' Auria, Building Official
Raymond Hallowell , Chairman PZC
AB Lombardi Associates
-Own, Ole SIOUM ?A01u:140t
_ 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
�osOR•co AREA CODE 203/644-2511
Mr. Christopher Stone
Fuss & O'Neill, Inc.
210 Main Street
Manchester, CT 06040
Re: Application No. 1326, Metals Testing Site Plan
Dear Mr. Stone:
Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
on February 16, 1988, to deny the above-referenced application
for a site plan of development. The reason for denial is that
the Commission believes a resubdivision application is necessary
to address engineering, road design and drainage concerns created
by enlarging Lot 3 beyond the boundaries set in the previous
subdivision approval granted by this Commission.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
David H. Sorenson
Vice Chairman
cc: Michael Gantick, Public Works Director
Marcia Banach, Director of Planning
i
t O,NN 6f4
O �
c `
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDSOR, CONN. 06074
SOR.CO�� AREA CODE 203/644-2511
August 24, 1988
Mr. Bob DeLisle
Metals Testing
P.O. Box 213
South Windsor, CT 06074
RE: Town acceptance of road, Myette Industrial
Subdivision, Sullivan Avenue.
Dear Mr. Delisle:
Per your request, please be advised that the addition of
a cul-de-sac turnaround at the northerly termination of the
approved road (Phase 1) in the above referenced subdivision will
result in a road that will be accepted by the Town of South
Windsor, provided that the following conditions are met:
1. The entire road, including the cul-de-sac turn
around, receives the necessary approvals .
2 . The entire road, including the cul-de-sac, is
constructed to town specifications and
3 . Any and all other subdivision approval conditions
and subdivision improvements contained on the
approved plans are satisfied.
Very truly yours,
Marcia A. Banach
Director of Planning
MAB/pmm