HomeMy WebLinkAboutBurr Meadow Condos Phase II - 7k
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 101 1981
PLANNING AND ZONING SION ACTION THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY
APPLICATION # THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT
RECEI`&M DATE: - THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING ON THE
APPROVAL DATE: FOURTH TUESDAY OF THE MONTH. IT SHALL
REJECTED DATE: BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND
RECEIPT # ZONING COMMISSION OFFICE ONE (1) WEEK
PRIOR TO THE FOURTH TUESDAY.
APPLICANT: Burr Meadow Associates, a Connecticut General Partnership
ADDRESS: c/o 219 Griffin Road, South Windsor, CT. 06074 TELEPHONE # 644-2333
OWNER OF RECORD ON S.W. LAND RECORDS Charles S. Burr and Anthony D. Russo
Burr: 48 Meadow Large, Manchester CT. 06040
ADDRESS:FRLtizsa.: 190 Old Stafford Roads Tolland, CT. 06094
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION OF PROPERTY For description of parcel, refer to Schedule
attached. For abutters within 500 feet, refer to Schedule B attached. All oth i
information available in General Plan and Maps which accompany. ZONE MF-A
NAME,. ADDRESS & TELEPHONE # OF PERSON TO WHOM CORRESPONDENCE AND INQUIRIES SHOULD BE
DIRECTED: Raymond J. Alexander, 219 Griffin Road, South Windsor, CT. 06074
TELEPHONE # 644-2333
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING)
1. Zone Change to Zone (public hear
ing) RECEIVED
2. Filing for Subdivision AUG 18 1981
3. Filing for Open Space Subdivision (public hearing)SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEFT.
4. Filing for Resubdivision (public hearing)
X 5. Special Exception to Article 4-6 of the Zoning Regulations (public hearin
6. Site Development Plan
7. Removal of Sand, Gravel, Clay or Quarry Stone & Ore (public hearing)
8. Other (explain in detail)
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND
S D ALONG WITH THREE SETS OF PLANS BEFORE IT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE PLANNING AND
NING 0 IO
P =IC OWNER Charles S. Burr
Raymo J. n er /Uenneral Partner
OWNER Antyny Russo
(over)
1
ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION OF
COMPLIANCE BY APPLICANT
I, Kevin M. O'Brien, as attorney for the applicant, Burr Meadow
Associates, aConnecticut General Partnership, hereby certify, with
reference to Burr Meadow condominium proposed on the southerly side of
Smith Street and the easterly side of Clark; that:
A. The applicant, or his assigns, shall comply with Chapter
825 of the Connecticut General Statutes; i.e., Connecticut Condominium
Act, where such development is a condominium; and for other multiple-
owner developments, the applicant shall provide to prospective purchasers,
a public offering statement substantially conforming to Sections 4-103
and 4-104 of the Uniform Planned Community Act, as adopted August 1980
by the National Conference of Commissioners of Uniform State Laws, and as
approved by the American Bar Association; and
B. The applicant, or his assigns, shall establish the multi-
family residential development's community association with documents in
which the covenants, conditions, and restrictions will contain language
which provide the same rights to dwelling-unit owners within any multiple-
owner development as are provided to cooperative and condominium-unit
owners under the Condominium and Cooperative Abuse Relief Act of 1980
(15 USC 3601-3616) .
Certified at Manchester, Connecticut
this 14th day of August, 1981.
r
By /'1.
Kevin M. O'Brien, Attorney-at-Law
599 Main Street
Manchester, CT 06040
646-3500
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT
BURR MEADOW--ZONE CHANGE/GENERAL PLAN
TRAFFIC IMPACT/BURR MEADOW
OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION TEST DATA
OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS '
r
r
—' B U R R M E A D O W
ZONE CHANGE/GENERAL PLAN
Zone Reg. 4.6.4.9 B.3.
POLICE & FIRE
Fire Marshall, William Lannin% and Police Chief, William Ryan, have
reviewed the project and have concluded that the project will have no
adverse impact on their respective departments. Both officials have had
correspondence with Town Planner, Peter DeMallie, that will support this
representation.
SCHOOLS
Burr Meadow, with its sixty (60) , two bedroom units and thirty eight
(38) , one bedroom units, will generate a projected 18 - 24 school age
children. This number of new students will have no adverse impact on the
South Windsor school system which has had a declining enrollment since
1976, as noted in the 1980 annual report.
South Windsor Public Schools Population
YEAR EI.E- JUNIOR HIGH
MENTARY HIGH SCHOOL. 'TOTAL.
_ 1976-77 (actual) 2314 1282 1182 4778
1977-78(actual) 2136 1261 1209 4596
1978-79(actual) 2009 1201 1194 4404
1979-80(projected) 1723 1206 1157 4086
1979-80(actual) 1897 1128 1159 4184
FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The site, with undulating terrain from Southeast to Northwest, lends
itself very nicely to regrading and landscaping due to the lack of excessive
grade changes.
This also allows for good building placement with no problems relating
to driveway access on the proposed road layout, designed to town specifications
and standards.
STREETS:
Of the two (2) Town roads bordering the property, improvements will,
be madeto Clgrk 5treet and Smith Street, upgrading the width and drainage
requirements to Town standards w�i1c'c also includes the instal ation o curbing
along the site frontage.
STORM WATER DRAINAGE.:- .
The off-side drainage areas that presently traverse the outskirts of
the site will be maintained approximately in their present locations and in
some cases will be enclosed in a piped system, discharging in the same locations
as at present, with no increase in discharge.
The on-site storm drainage will be collected in catch basins and
piped to detention basins, located on the site.
Any overland run - off from adjacent areas to the Southeast, presently
discharging onto the site, will also be collected in one of the detention
basins.
The total combined discharge from all of the detention basins on
site will not exceed the existing run - off from the site.
Investigation has determined that there are no locations on site that
would fit into the category of a 100 year flood plain..-
- �
UTIbIT� IES:
Water is available at Pleasant Valley Road and Clark Street. The
M.D,C. is presently making a study on the size and location of the mains.
Electric power is available on Clark Street.
The Gas Company is planning on servicing the site via Clark Street.
The .sanitary se_wers._design plan has been submitted to the Town Sewer
Commission and the main discharge line will tie in at the intersection of
Clark and Smith Streets. This will be a gravity system.
Telephone service will be provided from Clark Street.
IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE
CAPACITY OF MUNICIPAL AND STATE FACILITIES
STREETS:
The planned improvements to Smith Street and the present traffic
capacity of Clark Street, as described in detail in the traffic report,
indicate very Little impact on the streets.
DRAINAGE:
With the use of on-site detention basins, employing a zero increase
in run-off, the present off-site drainage system and the downstream structures
will receive no adverse impact from the project.
SANI3ARY SYSTEMS:
The site is located in an area that is relatively under-developed
and the sanitary waste discharge will have little impact on the Town sewage
system.
WATER SUPPLY:
The M.D.C. is presently studying the area to determine the best
service system to the site with a perspective on future growth.
It is anticipated that the supplying of water service to the site
will have no effect on"the Town's future plans.
GAS, TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE:
The Utility Companies are planning to service the site and it appears
there will be no adverse impact on the present capacity of these utilities.
OUTD22R LIGHTING:
The planned on-site outdoor lighting will be sufficiently shielded
and directed so as to not present any off-site nuisance.
SEDIMENTATION & EROSION CONTROL:
The general plan of development has taken into consideration sedi-
mentation and erosion controls to insure the existing quality of discharge
from the site.
SOLI WASTE DISPOSAL:
The units-will have their own trash rpneptacles within their garage
Are and these receptacles will be placed out for collection a rivate
firm.
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
R A. HESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
101 MILLBROOK COMMON-BLOOMFIELD,CT 06002-(203)242-7755
�- April 13, 1981
Mr. Joseph Russo
Palmberg & Russo
522 Cottage Grove Road
Bloomfield, Connecticut 06002
RE: Burr Meadow
Clark Street @ Smith Street
South Windsor
Our File: 8132
Dear Mr. Russo:
At your request we have conducted an investigation of roadway
and traffic conditions on sections of Pleasant Valley Road,
Clark Street, Smith Street and other local roadways in the
Town of South Windsor. We have performed the study so as to
provide you and your client as well as appropriate South
Windsor officials with a document to utilize as a guide in
determining t al traffic generation from a land use which
provides fo 99 units of multi-family housing. The report
presents the results of previous studies on the range of trip
generation rates at similar residential land uses as well as
the results of peak period counting programs at two existing
nearby facilities namely the Pleasant Valley Apartments and
Cinnamon Springs.
The site proposed for development is bounded on the north by
Smith Street and on the west by Clark Street. The southern
boundary of the property is occupied by the Cinnamon Springs
Apartments and other residential properties on Pleasant Valley
Road while the east boundary of the site is the agricultural
traffic studies traffic engineering traffic planning
land used by the Hartman Tobacco Company. Figure 1 depicts the
study area and its (relationship to area roadways .
Clark Street is a north-south roadway with total length of two
miles extending from an intersection with Chapel Road, Burnham
Street and the Manchester Industrial Road at the Manchester
town line northerly past Pleasant Valley Road, Smith , Street and
Deming Street to an intersection with Ellington Road (Connecticut
Route 30) near the Village of Wapping. Clark Street is a two
lane roadway generally 22 ' to 24 ' in width serving predominantly
single family and Agricultural land uses throughout its length.
The road does serve as a distributor road for traffic orininating
at the Cinnamon Springs and Pleasant Valley Apartments near the
Smith Street and Pleasant Valley Road intersection. The roadway
is posted at 30 miles per hour which provides for safe operations
for traffic on the' bituminous surface which is in generally good
condition. Speed signs and signs of warning of curves are
frequent along the roadway and a oainted center line provides
additional safety for traffic on this typical South Windsor
roadway . Stop signs control traffic on Clark Street at Chapel
Road and four way stops control operations at Clark Street and
-
Pleasant Valley Road.
Smith Street is a two-lane roadway extending approximately one
mile from its intersection with Clark Street easterly to an
intersection with Buckland Road. Smith Street is 18 ' to 22 '
in width with a roadway surface in fair to good condition
between Park Street and Wheeler Road one half a mile to the
east, a section of road which serves as the northern boundary
— 2
RTE.
N�
t
*`,t4v
vS%GNES i
Vq M�t�y pN
T / M
CH4p .�
v
z RO / g6
/ CD
0� FIGURE 1
TVRNp�KE STUDY AREA
TRAFFIC IMPACT
Np BURR MEADOW
�.P
F. A. HESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
101 Millbrook Common
BLOOMFIELD, CONN. 06002
of the property proposed for development as Burr Meadow. The
north Oide of this street opposite the subject site is
agricultural land in a RR urban classification. To the east of
Wheeler Road, Smith Street is 22 ' to 24 ' in width serving primarily
single family and agricultural land uses . Smith Street is posted
with a' maximum speed of 35 miles per hour.
P
Wheeler Road is a short stretch of road extending from Smith St.
southerly to an intersection with a recently relocated section
of Pleasant Vailey Road. Thereo developed properties
are oped n e l
fronting on Wheeler Road which is only three tenths of a mile in
— g Y
le th, and which has a posted speed of 25 miles per hour.
Pleasaint Vallee Road from its intersection with the former
Burnhalm Street,, intersection near the J.C . Penney complex northerly
was recently reconstructed as a modern two-lane roadway with
curbing on both sides of the roadway to a point beyond Croft St.
c �g � Y Y
where the roadway j on alignment with a 22 ' to
� Y rejoins its original g
24 ' roadway and a painted center line . Land use along the roadway
is predominantly agricultural or residential except in the
vicinity of the Clark Street intersection where the Pleasant
Valley and Cinnamon Spring apartments occupy the roadway frontage.
The ptincipal �driveway to those two facilities are lined up
nearly opposi a each other so as to form a crossroad approximately
100011east of ',the Clark Street intersection. West of Clark Street
Pleasant Valley Road continues to the Ellington Road intersection
and to a junction with John Fitch Boulevard and continues west to
Main Street. The area of roadway between Clark Street and
Ellington Road is devoted to a medium density single family units
4
except 't for the � Barrington Estates Development. Pleasant Valle
_. P p y
Road is postediat 30 miles per hour but frequent stop signs are
P q P g
in pla0e such as at Tudor Hill Road and Northview Drive in
addition to the four way stop at the Clark Street intersection.
During the course of our studies we conducted a series of
sam leliicounts of traffic movements in the study y area. Because
of thej extreme light traffic volume '
— �y g u e currently utilizing Smith
Street! we deci ed that a sampling program on that roadway would
not be! too effective and that estimates of peak hour and average
daily traffic on this street could best be developed by a study
of movements on other more heavily travelled roadways supplemented
i Y Y pP
by an analysis of previous traffic count data conducted in this
section of South Windsor. We did, however, conduct counts of
both morning a d afternoon peak period traffic movements at the
following locations: Clark Street, north of Pleasant Valley Road;
^, I
Clark Street, outh of Pleasant Valley Road; Pleasant Valley Road,
west of Clark Street; Pleasant Valley east of Clark Street;
Pleasant Valle Road east of the drive to Cinnamon Springs and
Pleasant Valley Apartments . In addition, we conducted morning
and afternoon eak period counts for all driveways to both
—
Connamon Springs and Pleasant Valley Apartments . Table I presents
estimates of 1980 average daily traffic as well as the morning
and afternoon peak hour traffic on roadways in the study area
based Ripon ana ysis of our count data and other count data available
for this area.
observations o traffic in the area indicates that virtually all
5
TABLE I
TRAFFIC IMPACT
—
BURR MEADOWS
EXISTING TRAFFIC IN STUDY AREA
i
LOCATION AVERAGE DAILY A.M. PEAK P.M. PEAK
TRAFFIC HOUR HOUR
Clark St.1 south o
Pleasant Malley Rd. 800 130 90
Clark St.l north of
PleasantlValley Rd. 600 80 80
Smith Street east
of Clark Street 100 + 10 + 10 +
Pleasant �Valle_v Rd.
west of Wheeler Rd. 3500 350 300
Pleasant Valley Rd.
west of dark St. 2850 275 250
6
traffic consis s of passenger vehicles and small trucks . Large
trucks make up a very small percentage of the traffic and school
-- bussesamount o less than 10 hourly movements on any roadway
durin ithe period immediate) receedin anci immediate) following
g p Y P g Y g
school!. The s hool bus period is coincident with the morning peak
i
i
_
hour blot occurs earlier than the afternoon peak hour. All inter-
sectioins in tha study area are provided with stop signs on at
-- least jone of t e approach roadways. "All Stop" control is in
effecti at the Pleasant Valley Road, Clark Street intersection.
Traffic operations on all roadways in the study area, including
—
the "ail1 stop" intersection, operate under conditions of free
flow with little or no restrictions in mobility due to the
presence of other vehicles. Drivers can maintain the desired
speediwith little or no delay. These operations are in a category
—
described by Traffic Engineers as level of Service A and B.
—
Appendix A reproduces a description of roadway capacities and
servioe volumes including a service volume for both Pleasant
Valley Road and Clark Street developed for the Town of South
Winds�r in 19 8 . Computations in that document would indicate
that traffic perations on both Clark Street and Pleasant Valley
—
Road Ore at 1 vel of Service A or B.
The s�te prop sed for development by Burr Meadow Associates
(Fig+ 2) occupies land at the southeast corner of Clark Street
and Stith Street with a frontage of 400 ' on Clark Street and 1100 '
on Smith Street. The proposed site is contiguous to the Cinnamon
T
Sprinajs development for 700 ' along its southern boundary. The
plann�d development would provide for 99 one and two bedroom
—
RTE.
c
P
t
'004001 I'll,
SM/T 50 N�llv
J � �A
ao FV T.
= w
Cti4p�C v / .
z RO / 86
J
FIGURE 2
�v�Np�KE SITE LOCATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
PN�
10\0 F. A. HESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
101 Millbrook Common
BLOOMFIELD, CONN. 06002
I
housing units in a proposed MF-A zoning district. 'tho most
reliabl means f estimating traffic that would be C'xT'Nected at
i
a new land use ' s a study of that which has been recorded at
similariland uses . In order to gain an understandin,j of the
data presented ere two definitions are useful: A TRIP is a
single r one direction vehicle movement with either the origin
or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site . The
AVERAGE TRIP RATE is the weighted average of the number of trips
per unit such as trips per dwelling unit. These are developed
by averaging rates published in various studies by summing all
trips and dividing the trips sum by the sum of the independent
variable (dwelling unit) to obtain a weighted average . over 270
different studies of subdivisions containing single family homes
have been made and published by the Institute of Transportation
Engine�rs . ThE subdivisions contained a total of more than
111,000 individual dwelling units . Subdivisions were located
primarily in suburban areas throughout the United States with a
finding that the average trip rate for single family homes was
10 .0 tips per day .
Townhouses and garden apartments generally show lower trip
i
generation rates per unit than that for single family housing.
The In titute of Transportation Engineers data from 113
differ�nt studies indicate an average trip rate of 6 .1 vehicle
trips per unit per ("tay .. The study data indicate's that condo-
miniumo produce traffic at a rate of approximately five vehicle
trips per dwelling unit per day. The ratios identified would
indicate approximately 600 vehicle trips per day would be
9
• anticipated fo the Burr Meadows complex. Table II shows a
summar� of rates developed for different types of dwelling
units s published in the latest revision of the Institute
of Tra sportat on Engineers study (February 1979) . That
table llustra es dramatically that single family detached
i
housin� units generate traffic at a rate significantly higher
than tat found at apartments and about twice that found at
condominium housing. The total daily traffic expected from
the development proposed at Burr Meadows is approximately 600
vehicle trips per day. Recalling that a trip is a one-way
moveme t then the total traffic will be approximately 300
vehicles entering -she site and a similar number departing the
proper y on a typical day . Peak hour movements would be
expected to range from 50 to 100 total movements .
During the course of our studies , in addition t4 the count of
movements on Clark Street and Pleasant Valley Road, we made
counts of all novements into and out of both the Cinnamon
Springs and Pleasant Valley Apartments complexes . The results
of those counts indicate that both Cinnamon Springs and Pleasant
Valley are generating traffic at a slightly lower rate than would
be expected from application of the data developed in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers study. Peak hour movements
at Pleasant Valley Apartments were recorded at 69 and 65 total
movements during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. At
Cinnamon Springs the total a.m. movements were 51 and the total
two-w y traffic during the p.m. peak was recorded as 44 . Since
there are a total of 142 apartments at Pleasant Valley, the
10
06
observed peak our traffic is at the low end of the expected range .
Similarly with 102 units at Cinnamon Springs we would expect peak
hour movement ' n the order of 50 to 100 vehicles . It would appear
then that an analysis of Burr Meadow based upon 600 daily trips
and 80 peak hour trips would be appropriate and would provide a
conservative o "worst case" analysis .
Figures 4 through 7 present the results of the counting programs
at Plecasant Valley and Cinnamon Springs apartments .
While It is impossible to accurately predict the directional dis-
tribut on of traffic from a new residential community, a study of
directional distribution of existing residents in the same
neighborhood would provide the basis for judging the destination
of new residents . During the afternoon counting programs we
record ad the direction l)y which each of the motorists with a
destination within Cinnamon Su rings or Pleasant Valley Apartments
approach the neighborhood. The results of that data is shown in
Table III . Ex ressed in terms of percentage it is found that
54% of all tra fic to and from the apartments has an origin on
Pleasant Valle Road east of the area, 25% on Pheasant Valley
Road west of t e area, 15% from Clark Street south of the area
and 6% from Clark Street north of the area. A similar dis-
tribution would be anticipated for the new residents with some
traffic utilizing Smith Street for access to Buckland Road and
others utilizing Wheeler Road to gain access to Pleasant Valley
Road. An expected distribution of traffic from Burr Meadow then
is sh wn on Figure 3 . Application of the directional distribution
11
J d daily volume of 600 and the peak
_ from Figure 3 o the projected y
hour of 80 wou d result in additional traffic on area roadways as
shown in Tables IV, V, and VI . That data indicates that the
projected increased traffic is not significant on any area roadway
and wi 1' not result in a diminution of the level of service
available to traffic on the roadways .
As part of our study we reviewed the relationship between the
site and the adjacent roadways so that we may recommend a location
of driveways or points of access and egress between the property
and public roadways . We recommend that the major drive to the
facility be placed to Smith Street at virtually any location
a minimum of 2001 from the Smith Street/Clark Street intersection.
-
Smith Street is a level tangent roadway so that there are no
sight distance considerations required in placement of the
driveway . A secondary drive or a drive for emergency access
purposes could be made to Clark Street if the internal pattern
was such as tc discourage its movement by substantial amounts
of traffic.
I appreciate the opoort,nity to present our analysis of traffic
operations and our findings and recommendations with respect
to the development of Burr Meadows . The undersigned will be
available as may be necessary to present our findings to appropriate
officials in the Town of South Windsor.
Very truly yours ,
F . A. HESKETH & ASSOC,IATES, INC.
Frede ick A. Hesketh, P .E .
e
-- TABLE II
Sunrimary of Rate Tables of the Different Types of Dwelling Units.
Type of Dwelling Unit Average Weekday►Vehicle
Trip Ends per Unit
Average Maximulm Minimum
210 Single-Family Detached Unit 10.0 21.9 4.3
220 A artment, General 6.1 12.3 0.5
221 w-Rise Apartment 5.4 5.5 4.7
222 H igh-Rise Apartment 3.7 6.4 1.2
230 C ndominium 5.1 9.4 0.6
240 Mobile Home 5.4 6.8 2.8
250 Retirement Community 3.3 4.9 ! 2.8
270 P anned Unit Development 7.9 10.0 6.2
Source: "Trii Generation - An Informational. ReOort"
Institute of Transportation Engineers, j P.O.
Box 9234, Arlington, Virginia 2220�, F�bruary
1979, Page 200
13
TABLE III
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC AR4IVING
AT CINNAMON SPRINGS AND PLEASANT VA�LEY
DURING P.M. PEAK HOUR
ORIGI
(DIRECTION OF CINNAMON SPRINGS PLEASANT V�LLEY TOTAL
APPROACH)
Clark Street north of
Pleasant Valley 4 1 5
Pleasant Va ley west of
Clark Street 7 14 21
Clark Street south of
Pleasant Va ley 3 9 12
Pleasant Valley east of
Apartments 20 24 44
TOTAL 34 48 82
14
RTE.
c
r
t
!0jgso%
v�N �E
M1T Sp NG�S
Fy T.
Ln
. ctiq pF Q
. C v
2 RO / 86
/ CID
�QP FIGURE 3
0
v�NP�KE DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
PLO
F. A. HESKETH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
101 Millbrook Common
BLOOMFIELD, CONN. 06002
TRAFFIC COUNT
GRAPHIC SUMMARY SHEET
Pleasa t Valley Road @ Cinnamon Springs Pleasant Valley Apts .
April 1.0, 1981 TIME 7 :00-8:00 AM
DATE'--- -- - -- ---- --- ---- — - - -- - - - - - — - ---
I
NI
O
NORTH
O
r
U j
i
9
C99
199 - 210
34
.- ---336 348
25
4 ! 87 138
26
Pleasa t Valley Rd. �r O Ln
4j
O R,
v
T
rn
T rtVI
•AV,
JJW
*Shows combined n'
I
movements f r m both !
driveways from Cinnamon Springs
on Pleasant alley Road. -
Figure 4
F A f lesk th 88 Associates
16
TRAFFIC COIF T
GRAPHIC SUMMARY SH ET
Cinnamon Springs @ Clark Street
LOCATION-
DATE: April 8, 1981 TIME :7:00-8 :00 AM
NORTH
-- Clark Street
"- 48
5 l 47
81
32 31 33
2
N �O •�
ri
00
Figure 5
F A Hes eth Assmietes
TRAFFIC COUNT
GRAPHIC SUMMARY SHEET
LOCATION:_ Pleasant Valley Road-@ Cinnamon Sq is & Pleasant Velle AQts
DATE: April) ll, 1981 TIME 4 : 30-5 : 30 PM
� A
M
CT
r.
- f4
NORTH Q''
�.. to 00
, N �
cd
00 0 0 U
N
2
9 91 - --- 135
6
-- 265 283
3
16 34 148
11
Pleasant Valley Road
N N
N
II �
N
c 4J
Sa
I �
I �
I o
Ln r-4
i � roll
)
f^
•V
*Shows combined movements ,-A
T from both driveways from a
Cinnamon Springs on
Pleasant Valley Road.
i
h A 1 it.sk .th & Associlates Figure 6
18
t
TRAFFIC COUNT
GRAPHIC SUMMARY SH�ET
-- Cinnam n Springs at Clark Street
DATE:
April 1, 1981 TIME : 4 : 30-5: 30 PM
NORTH
., II IIII
lark Street
2 23 04 27
3
81 82
5$ 53 55
2
N d'
lD Ln
I i
T
F A Hes eth & Associates
Figure 7
-
19
I I
. TABLE IV
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
— TRAFFIC
AVERAGE DAILYI
EXISTING LOCATION EX NG PROJECTED TOTAL
ADT INCREASE TRAFFIC
Clark Street north of
Smith Street. 600 36 636
Clar
k Street south of
Pleasant Valley 800 90 890
Pleasant Valley west
of Clark Street 2850 150 3000
Pleasant Valley east
of Wheeler oad 3500 240 3740
Smith Street east of
Wheeler Road 100 + 84 200 +
II
-
I
T
T
T� III
20
nl�
l
I
i
-- TABLE V
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
MORNING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
7: 00 - 8: 00 AM
-- LOCATION EXISTING PROJECTED TOTAL
TRAFFIC INCREASE TRAFFIC
Street north of
Clark St 85
Smith Street 80
-' Clark Street south of
130 142
Pleasant valley
1
-- Pleasant Valley west of 295
Clark Street
275
Pleasant Valley east of
Wheeler
Road
350 3i2 382
Smith Street east 4f 21
Wheeler Road 10 11
r-
21
I
-- TABLE VI
TRAFFIC IMPACT
BURR MEADOW
EVENING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
4 : 30 - 5: 30 PM l
i
LOCATION EXISTING PROJECTED TOTAL
TRAFFIC INCREASE TRAFFIC
Clark Street north of
Smith Street 80 5 85
J Clark Street south of
-- Pleasant Valley
90 12 92
Pleasant Valley west
of Clark Street
250 20 270
Pleasant Valley east of
Wheeler Ro d 300 32 332
Smith Stre t east of
10 11 21
Wheeler Road
22
T
APPENDIX A
- ROADWAY CAPACITIES AND SERVICE OLU ES
FROM
BURNHAM STREET TRAFFIC STUDY
BY: CLOSE, JENSEN & MILL R
OCTOBER 1978
i
-
I
i
7CO Roadway Yleolffdlieij and 99eiv e Wlumen
�
The capacity of a roadway must be given not in one al solute value, but in
several values, each of which represent varying levels of congestion, unstable
flow aid operating conditions. These various levels called Levels-of-Service"
P 9
-- A throu h F (as defined in the Highway Research Board, HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL)
are giv n below:
Level of Service A describes a condition of fre flow, with low volumes and
high speeds. Traffic density is low, with spee s controlled by driver de-
sires, speed limits, and physical roadway icondi ions. There is little or
no restriction in maneuverability due to the pr sence of other vehicles,
and drivers can maintain their desired speeds with little or no delay.
Level of Service B is in the zone of stablle flo, , with operating speeds
beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic onditions. Drivers still
have reasonable freedom to select their speed a d lane of operation. Re-
ductions in speed are not unreasonable, with a ow probability of traffic
flow being restricted. The lower limit (lowest speed, highest volume) of
this level of service has een associated with ervice volumes used in the
design of rural highways.
Level of Service C is still in the zone of stab a flow, but speeds and
maneuverability are more closely controlled by he higher volumes. Most
of the drivers are restricted in their freedom o select their own speed,
change lanes, or pass. A relatively satisfacto y operating speed is still
obtained, with service volumes perhaps suitablelfor urban design practice.
Level of Service D approaches unstable flow, wi h tolerable operating speeds
being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating con-
ditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary Iestrictions to flow may
cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Divers have little freedom
to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are to;, but conditions can be
tolerated for short periods of time.
Level of Service E cannot be described by', speed_alone, but represents
operations at even lower operating speeds than n level D, with volumes at
r-- or near the capacity of the highway. At capacity, speeds are typically one'
half the speed attainable at Level-of-Se M ce Ai. Flow is unstable, and
there may be stoppages of momentary duration.
Level of Service F describes forced flow operation at low speeds, where
volumes are below capacity. These conditions usually result from queues
r of vehicles backing up from a restriction downstream. The section under
�- 16
i
I
tudy will be serving as a storage area during parts or all of the peak
our. Speeds are reduced susstantially and stopp 'ges may occur for short
r long periods of time because of the downstream congestion. In the extreme,
' oth speed and volume can drop to zero.
The relationship between the service volumes at vario' s levels-of-service is
given in the Highway Capacity Manual as follows:
-- Level-of-Service E Capacity Volume
evel-of-Service D 90% Capacity
evel-of-Service C 75% Capacity
evel-of-Service B 50% Capacity
Level-of-Service A 35% Capacity
Level-of-Service F has no service volume since this rj presents unstable flow and
may actually result in zero flow (stopped condition).
-- The ultimate capacity of a two-lane two-way rural roal, way under ideal conditions
is 2,000 vph, total both directions. Two of the factors ich affect capacity are:
Lane width and lateral clearances.
LA
NE WIDTH
Ideal conditions include 12 foot wide lanes. Narrower lanes reduce capacity
according to the following table:
Lane Width F' Capacity
.� ((Feet) % of 12 Foot Lane Capacity
12 100
11 88
10 81
9 76
r- LATERAL CLEARANCES
A clear distance to side obstruction of at least 6 f et is necessary to obtain
r--
ideal conditions. Lesser lateral clearances reduce capacity as follows:
Clearance From
Pavement Edge to Obstruction Capo ity of Two
Both Sides (Ft) 12 IFoot lanes % of Ideal
6 100
4 92
2 83
0 72
17
I II
i
- Applying the above factors to the ultimate capacity of 2,000 vph, using the conditions
given in s�cti on 6, results in the following practical capa i ti es:
Burnham Street:
(2000 VPH) x (1001) x (85%) = 1700 V H Total Both Directions
12-FT Lanes 22-FT Lat.
_. Clark Street:
(2000 VPH) x (85%) x (72%) = 1170 VPji Total Both Directions
10-FT Lanes 0-FT Clear
Pleasant Valley Road:=
2000 VPH x (100%) x (85%) _ 1700 V H Total Both Directions
-- 12-FT Lanes 2 2-FT Lat.
These practical capacities result in the anticipated sl rvice volumes listed
bel ow:
TABLE 7-A
SERVICE VOLUME (TOTAL BOTH DI RECT'I!Oi4S)
Burnham Pleasant Clark
Level-Of-Service Street Valley Road Str et
-- A 590 590 410
B 850 850 5 0
C 1270 1270 8 0
D 1530 1530 100
E 1700 1700 1110
TABLE 7-B
SERVICE VOLUME (ONE DIRECTI0M
Burnham Pleasant Cla k
Level-Of-Service Street Valley Road Str et
A 295 295 21)5
B 425 425 290
C 635 635 Oil 5
765 765 525
i — 850 850 585 18
Due �o the deteriorated condition of the roadway pavements, and the total
— lack of a y sideaialk in this area, the values given in Tables 7-A and 7-B should be
interpret d as absolute maximum values for each level-of-s rvice.
—
T
T
I�
T-
10
T
4+
APPENDIX B
TRAFFIC COUNTS
PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD AT CLARK STREE
r--
I '
{
TRAFFIC COUNT
GRAPHIC SUMMARY SHEET
LOCATIO : Pleasant Valley Road @ Clark Street!
DATE: April 8, 1981 TIME 7:00 - 8 :00 AM
M
co
NORTH
N
Ln M
r-I �D tnl
15
T 165 145 --- 242
5
-- � 26 336
13
102 79 94
2
Pleas Ant Valley Road \
N M N
N 00
M
T—
Q�
�1
b !
F A lie.keth 8 Associates APPEN ' IX B-1
TRAFFIC COU T
GRAPHIC SUMMARY SH ET
4 LOCATION: Pleasant Valley Road at Clark Street
April 11, 1981 4 : 30 - 5 : 30 PM
DATE_-- -- - --_-- - - - - ---------- ------ - -- --- - --�-- TIME - -- --- - ---
co
._ 4J
a�
NORTH �I
4J
l0 Ln
N Ln
�4
r-1 i
VI
o rn �D
N N
T \
12
99 82 99
5
247 265
9
148 123 166
T
34
Pleasant Valley Road
Ln Ln H
r--4
T
co
N l0
Lt
T
co
T�
APPEN IX B-2
F A Heskleth & Associates
i
I
aein�ez &
LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 492 - BLOOMFIELD. CONNECTICUT 06002 - (�03) 24 2775
OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION TEST ATA
LATE: Ito S-6 O OWNER: ��, x A�'aE� � ADDRESS
-- J. 2 ss o
3ST OBSERVED Y:€�151�.es><2 RZ. m,�
LOCATION OF LOT: " 2MgkDows- CLAIM �'. so
3SERVATION PIT # 1.
%-)TAL DEPTH (o INCHES
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS:
r )P OF GROUND TO WAS s°o L WAS GROUND WAT R ENCOUNTERED: YES NO
rr
TO 1 rr DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: e4-"
..
8 4 Som _ Io,4 do
5
41`'D / ".Drrw ANY SIGNS OF M TTLING: YES NO
TO 3 " A Tit Ac F. F C c ay,
SIj.Tr s.c�a /
-- �� TO " wety� CZ DEPTH TO ?4OTTL NG: INCHES
TO 4946 " C L Ay WAS LEDGE ENCOUNTERED: YES NO
DEPTH TO LEDGE INCHES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUNIMTER OBSERVED AND MAXIMUM GROUNDIdATER FOR AREA:
4' Y OTHER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT INFLUENCE OPERATION OF FI D:
PERCOLATION TEST:
I7:PTH OF TEST INCHES LENGTH OF PRES AK:
14INIYM4 UNIT PERCOLATION RATE: MIXIINCII
I AREA SUITAIEE FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL AT THIS T ME: YES,NO
i
i
LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS
P.O BOX 492 - BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06002 (20 ) 242.2775
-- OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATI N TE T DATA
DATE: I Z'S-8 OWNER: A L E x A*b E�2, - - - ADDRESS
.J. f�.S:c o
TEST OBSERVED BY: ,aEsE,c,
LOCATION OF LOT: ��� 9p e 5�-. S.' LZ,A.)
OBSERVATION PIT #
-- TOTAL D127" I 0 Z- INCHES
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS:
TOP OF GROEND TO 17- -s 1 r , WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED: YES NO
FiN6 5.�vo/
1 Z " TO %156 DEPTH TO GR UNDWATER: la2z"
3( " TO 7 Z_ " ANY SIGNS MOTTLING: YES
-- -T Z " TO 102- " C!LA DEPTH TO MO ING: INCHES
" TO f' WAS LEDGE E COUNTERED: YES NO
DEPTH TO LE E: INCHES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROU1494ATER OBSERVED AND 14AXIMI,7 GROUNDWATER FOR AREA:
T
ANY OTIAER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT INFLUENCE OPERATION OF FIELD: _
PEiiCOLATIO TEST:
DEr ITH OF TEST: INCHES LENGTH OF P SOAK: _
IiINII•JIUM UNIT PERCOLATION RATE: MIN/.NCH
IS AREA SUITABLE FOR ON-SITE SYdAGE DISPOSAL AT THI TIME: YES,NO
i
I
,�aeitz�ez 8c. �i 2�a�d
LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 492 - BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06002 - Q03) 242,2775
-- OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION T SST DATA
LATE: IZ-S- 80 WNER: ALExAWl>eC, Vi�-- ADDRESS
.3, TZ"vsso
7 ,ST OBSERVED : IE. ICA]jsjEC 2. 1,1og
LOCATION OF L : Zortm EADac•>s4 0 G.A2t:. ST. S. �LADIPJ;>501r__
C 6ERVATION PI # 3
79TAL DEPTH jopl& INCHES
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS:
SlAry XORAJ
7, 1P OF GROUND 0 12- "rTb Pso i` WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED: YES N 0
Z " TO 1 O " QR C�,p DEPTH TO GIROUN WATER:
" TO " ANY SIGNS �OF M TTLING: YES NO
" TO " DEPTH TO MIOTTL NG: INCHES
" TO " WAS LEDGE ENCOUNTERED: YES NO
T DEPTH TO LEDGE INCHES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUNDdATER OBSERVED AND MAXIM GROUNWATER FOR AREA:
A Y OTHER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT INFLUENCE OPERATION OF FI D:
P'hRCOLATION TEST:
D PTH OF TEST: INCHES LENGTH OF 'PRES AK:
RATE: MI I N C
I�IINIMUI�i UNIT PERCOLATION
I7 AREA SUITAELE FOR ON-SITE SEdAGE DISPOSAL AT THIS T ME: YES,NO
i
r--
l
all
�cicda
LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS
P 0 BOX 492 BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06002 F (203) 2 2-2775
OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION (TEST DATA
DATE: IZ-S-ft OWNER: A1.Ex AWDGe. de. ADDRESS
'TEST OBSERVE BY:, g,, KA F p T. M, I �
LOCATION OF LOT: K. MgIca C L A rt 1� T,
OBSERVATION PIT '#
,TOTAL DEPTH 120 INCHES
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS:
it S/4 �o��►-�
rOP OF GROUN TO 1Z Q,�_ WAS GROUND WA ER ENCOUNTERED: YESQ
n u C.1AI/
I Z TO 3 Sow sp�p DEPTH TO IGROUI DWATER:
" TO IO " MOP- s&ro t> ANY SIGNS OF OTTLING: YES ONO
TO I Z " C LA DEPTH TO MO ING: INCHES
" TO " WAS LEDGE ENC IINTERED: YES NO
T
DEPTH TO 'LEDG : INCHES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUNUdATER OBSERVED AND MAC MUM GROUNDWATER FOR AREA:
NY OTHER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT- INFLUENCE OPERATION iOF F ELD:
.ERCOLATION TEST:
IEPTH OF TEST: INCHES LENGTH OF PRE OAK:
MINIMUM UNIT PERCOLATION RATE: MIX/IN H
7
S AREA SUITABLE FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL AT THIS IME: YES,NO
f
i II
I
�eilt�eZ &
LAND SURVE"ORS & ENG NEERS
P.O. BOX 492 • BLOOMFIELD• CONNECTICUT 06002 (203) 242-2775
1
OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION TEST DATA
DATE: t 2 S•9 0 OWNER: A l.[XA N c>E CO. ADD1R'ESS
S, fC�sso
TEST OBSERVED BY: E. A 2: ► ►
LOCATION OF LOT: " T3ue� C L*W- Srt: S, eo
OBSERVATION PIT # S
TOTAL DEFTH I Z 6 INCHES
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS:
TOP OF GROUND TO ! $ " "1"b PS o i` WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED: YES,N(
T 7. " SA►�a � cam,irk. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER:. LD6Y' C LA
et.4y /l,.7lr.V
'4Z " T �" S � s,4�n ANY SIGNS OF I!'IOTTLING: NO
" T 3 z " C° L. DEPTH TO OTTLING: 30 INCHES
" TD WAS LEDG ENCOUNTERED: YES NO
DEPT�i TO EDGE: INCHES
RMATION HIP BETWEEN GROUNDWATER OBSERVED AND WIMUM GROUNDWATER FOR AREA:
Li
ANY OTHER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT- INFLUENCE OPERATION OF FIELD:
T
PERCOLATION TEST:
T TES • INCHES LENGTH 0 PRESOAK:
DEPTH OF TEST:
1•iINIMM4 JNIT PERCOLATION RATE: � N/INCH
IS AREA 3UITABLE FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL AT HIS TIME: YES,NO
i
i
`- LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS I
P.O. BOX 492 • BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06002 . (203) 2 2.2775
OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION TEST DATA
DATE: IZ-S- 6b OWNER: fr Lzx A N fljEjc R:. ADDRESS
-'PEST OBSERVED BY: , e ,eE
�E'SE
LOCATION OF LOT: �� J3u�rt E,�ao�s '' C Ate srt,
-
OBS ERVATI ON P T #
.-TOTAL DEPTH 1 I INCHES�-- I HES
30IL CHARACTE STICS•
SOP ROUND F G T 0
0__� WAS GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED: YES N
" TO I " Fi n0 F. 5!A M p DEPTH TO Xi
GROUNDWATER:
-
" TO " ANY SIGNS OF I TILING: YES NO
-
" TO " DEPTH TO �OTTL NG: INCHES
TO " WAS LEDGE ENCO TERED: YE NO
qo
DEPTH TO KEDGE INCHES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUNDWATER OBSERVED AND MAXI M GROUNMATER FOR AREA:
,NY OTHER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT INFLUENCE E •
OPERATION ��' FI D.
.ERCOLATI ON TEST:
-EPTH OF TEST: INCHES LENGTH OF ]ORES AK:
14INIMUM UNIT PERCOLATION RATE: Ml�/INCll
3 AREA SUITABLE FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL AT T41S TIME: YES,NO
,��zeitt�e� & i GGd C1
LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 492 - BLOOMF'IELD, CONNECTICUT 06002 - (�03) 242 2775
OBSERVATION PIT AND PERCOLATION T ST ATA
LriTE: IZ-S-So WIJFsR: A)..E1CRfoDE2_ . ADDRESS
5 sT OBSERVED Y: F, s���. ►.moo
LOCATION OF LOT:_10 urt2. Ac>oLlo.s C! L.piP_<
( ZERVATION Prr # 7
TOTAL DIEM 107- INCHES
SilL CHARACTERISTICS:
,f SANDY TPsor`/ WAS GROUNDWAY ER ENCOUNTERED: YES ?r 0
7�P OF GROUND 0 � w+�oK���.Ay
CAA tairr I s�"— 30" Sc+ uOAS f�'1ois--'
1 Z " TO 18 " ,� oLc S�gN� DEPTH TO GkUN WATER: I o
r
TO12 A SIGNS MOTTLING: N 0
C L Ay
TO 102. Z-ie.Qc -of A YA DEPTH TO M�OT` L NG: �_ INCHES
" TO It WAS LEDGE ENCO TERED: YES NO
DEPTH TO LEDGE: INCHES
RMATIONSHIP B TWEEN- GROUNDWATER OBSERVED AND MAXISGROUNDWATER FOR AREA:
A Y OTHER FACTOR WHICH MIGHT INFLUENCE OPERATION OF FIELD: -
PLRCOLATION TE T:
D'7FTH OF TEST: INCHES LENGTH OF PRESOAK:
]UNI1✓,U4 UNIT PERCOLATION RATE: MI ZINCEI
^
I. AREA SUITA E FOR ON-SITE SWAGE DISPOSAL AT TH 'S TIME: YES,NO
u-5ATr.e t%.�lAArS OpSS>Er�u6p AT '
W A S w
a
� r
it I R
April 13 1981
BURR MEADOW
South Windsor, Connecti pt
Owner: Burr Meadow Associates Architect: King-Architects
South Windsor, Connecticut Avon, Connecticut
OUTLINE SPECIFICATIO
DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, GENERAL CONDITIONS
The General Contractor is to carry liability p' sura ce and performance bond;
too abidee with a aws, codes, and ordinances; is to provide field office
with telephone, heat, and fire protection. H will be using AIA General
Conditions A-201 .
DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK
— Refer to General Plan of Development Plans an Docu ents
._ DIVISION 3 - CONCRETE
Concrete strength as follows:
_. Construction Element Maximum Slui no Oinimom Slum
Footings 5 inches 3000
Walls (protected from weather) 4 inches 3000
Interior slab-on-grade 3 inches 3000
Exterior slab-on-grade 3 inches 4000
Concrete exposed to weather 4 inches 4000
— Structural system: Main floor, slab-on-grade,' 4 in hes concrete, with
6x6 #10/10 FWM. Slab perimeter insulation, 2 inchet rigid insulation under
entire slab.
DIVISION 4 - MASONRY
5 - METAL DIVISION _ S �
Lintels: Steel lintels as noted on drawings.
Outline Specification
Burr Meadow -2- April 13, 1981
DIVISION 6 - WOOD AND PLASTICS
Framing: Nos. 1 & 2 West Coast fir, spruce, 6em-f7. with F=1200 psi .
Sills: 2x4; studs 2x4, 16"o.c.
H aders: As noted on drawings
S eathin : 3/8" plywood
Roof: Trusses 24" o.c.
E terior Siding: Vinyl (R factor of 0.61 )
E terior Trim: Western Red Cedar, D or bette
I terior Trim: Nos. 1 & 2 grade common pine
DIVISION 7 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION
Concrete slab-on- rade, 6 mil polyethylene vapor ba rier
E terior walls behind 1/2" gypsum board) , Kraft pa er with reflective foil
_. face.
T ermal Insulation: Exterior walls: 3-5/8" -'iberg ass batts in stud wall
aid 1/2" foamboard on interior surface. Ceiling be ow roof: 9" fiberglass
b tts between joists, or 9" minimum loose blo in in.
R ofin : Asphalt shingles--rectangle seal tab 235# UL class C on 15# felt.
S eet Metal. 16-gauge copper flashing at int rrsect on of roof and vertical
s rfaces. .019" aluminum at head of doors, w ndows and vents. .024" alum-
._ i um gutters. .032" prefinished caulkings.
Caulking: To be nonhardenin and nonshrinkin acr is latex.
9 � Y
DIVISION 8 - DOORS, WINDOWS, AND GLASS
-- Windows and Frames: Aluminum casement windows, fac ory-glazed, with 5/8"
insulating glass.
Glazing: Fixed glass 5/8" insulated.
Siding: Vinyl clapboards.
Doors and Frames:
Exterior: Front doors 1-3/4" solid core, raised panel', wood, stain.
Rear doors 1-3/4" solid core wood paint or jnsul ted metal .
Exterior gliding doors aluminum, with 5/8" , insul ting glass.
Interior: Interior doors 1-3/4" hollow co .
Closet doors bi-folding, prefinished wood paint .
Storage doors 1-3/4" solid core wood paint
1
-- Outline Specification
Burr Meadow -3- April 13 1981
Division 8, Continued: l
._ Finish Hardware: Exterior and interior: Loc 4ets rass finish; window
hardware by window manufacturer; cabinet hardware by cabinet manufacturer.
Brass apartment numbers.
-" W atherstri in : Windows, wool pile. Exterior do rs neoprene.P �4Thresholds,
aluminum.
—
S reens: Prefinished aluminum frames with a mi u nu wire mesh by window
w
manufacturer.
DIVISION 9 - FINISHES
G ade material ,
ater al , and thickness of all interio sheal�,�hing to be as follows:
1/2" gypsum board on foil-faced vapor barrier on 0/2" Foam board (exterior
walls.
-- Water-resistant gypsum board in bathroom.
Fire rated gypsum boards at party walls andifurnice room.
1/21' or 5/8" gypsum board--all other inter dr wa is and ceiling.
Painting:
Exterior I terio
Wood trim--semi-transparent exterior W od--1 coat primer, 1 coat
stain, 2 coats. s ri-gl ss latex
Vinyl factory finish. Metal--' coat'i metal primer, one
No masonry. coat se i-globs latex
W Ils-- coat primer, l coat
s Mi-gl ss latex
Kitchen and Both--vinyl wall
c vleri n
Tile and Ceramic Bathroom Accessories:
Material
Location Floors Walls
Kitchens V.A. Tile See above
— Baths Sheet Vinyl .090" orlon $ee above
Other areas Carpet See above
Bathroom Accessories: Glass/toothbrush holder, oilet � paper holder,
2 towel bars, and 2 soap dishes in each- bathroom.
Resilient Flooring: See above.
4
-- Outline Specification
Burr Meadow -4- April 13, 1981
DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES
Medicine Cabinets: Prefinished steel , 22" x 10", f ush-mounted: One per
bathroom.
Mail Boxes, Package Receivers: U.S. Postal Service*proved.
Packaged Incinerators: None
DIVISION 11 - E UIPMENT
_ Refrigerators: 12 cubic feet, electric, with �,sleparilte door for freezer.
K tchen Ranges: 30-inch gas, front controls, all wits.
Kitchen cabinets:
Wall units to be wood, with a factory finish.
Base units to be wood, with a factory finiO
'T Counter top and backsplash material to be flasti laminate on particle board.
Other Appliances: One each per apartment:
Garbage disposer
Dishwasher
Clothes washer and drier
DIVI ION 12 - .FURNISHINGS
W ndow shades or blinds by .Owner I, I
DIVISION 13 - SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
Incinerators to be job-constructed.
DIVISION 14 - CONVEYING SYSTEMS
None.
DIVISION 15 - MECHANICAL
.Plumbinq and hot water supply:
Sink: SS 25"��x 21"��with mix faucet and sp ry.
Lavatory: 19 x 17 vitreous china (count ).
WaterCloset: Tank-type
Bathtub and Shower: One piece, fiberglass,
T
Ilk
L
Outline Specification
Burr Meadow -5- April 13, 1981
Division 15 Continued:
� I
Soil Lines: Cast Iron
Waste Lines and vents: PVC or ABS
Water Lines: Hard drawn copper, Type L
Gas Lines: Steel
Standpipes: Black steel
-' Domestic Water Heatin : Individual hot water' heate s in each apartment,
capacity- 60 GFM electric).
Insulation: 1/2" fiberglass insulation onllWater pipes.
Heatin : Hot water system, gas. Calculated pad t be determined. Room
heating units o be baseboard. Temperature c htrols in ach apartment.
Ventilation: Toilet and kitchen exhaust.
._ 'r i _
i Condition ng Self contained units, AC sleeves provided. AC units
by Owner.^
Gas: Yes.
Sanitary Sewerage to be on the municipal sewerage s stem.
—
DIVISION 16 - ELECTRICAL
Electric Wiring: Wiring to be Romex. Each allrtme t to be individually
metered, with space conduits for future load. , Site will have a motor
antenna system and a smoke detector in each aO4rtme t.
Electric Fixtures: Fixtures included for eaci, apar ment: Exterior street
and walk lights, semi-recessed wall and ceili lig is in vestibules,
2 lights in car barn, 1 exterior light for de-_1or atio, ceiling and
cabinet florescent in kitchen, 2 wall incande cent n living room, 1 flor-
escent in bathroom, 1 recessed fixture in hal ' and each for stairwell .
1 florescent in laundry, 1 wall incandescent in bed oom, 1 doorbell .
—
Primary service will be underground, connecte�'ito p le lights and bollard
lights.
Charles . King, AIA
I
2. Developers Permit — Burr Meadows — Raymond Alexander
Mr. haw said the W. P. C. A. received a letter' fromIBurr eadows requesting
the tatus of the Developer' s Permit that we di�scuss d con erning this
projict. He said the developer lowered a section of gravi y line on
Clark Street and put a small line along Smith S�treet� H aid they were
requested by the Town to make these improvement li not onl; o handle their
own project but to handle projects upstream. �r. Sh�w sai Mr. Alexander
reque-sted a Developer' s Agreement which would help t reco er their costs.
Discussion followed.
Mr. Carino asked that this item be placed on t nex agen a for the
first meeting in September and that the commis ironer revi w the
Deve' oper' s Permit in the rules and regulation band ry to determine
any -inadequacies that it might have and how we�,,can c ange it.
MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION DIS USS PENDING CLAIMS
Tabl ed.
(J) ADJOURNMENT
ino.1 Mr� Gilsenan seconded the
Mr. Cottle made a motion to adjourn the meet
in
n. Motion unanimously carried.
Meet ng adjourned at 9:05 P. M.
- Verk Mark A.� IPetei-son, Secretary
onfz,
pow N r��
COY
ap s -
�� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOU -I WIN SOR. ONN. 06074
�.yosQR.�o�,-- - AREA RE 2 3/644- 511
Apri� 22, I1981
jeo:Raymond
ado:iws Associates
J. Alexander
219 Gk'ffin Road
South ?indsor, Connecticut 06074 CERTI 4AIL
Dear Sir:
At the April 20, 1981 meeting, the Sol,uth 1t inds r Inland 11 etlands
Agency granted a permit with conditions for yoor Application No. 177,
to re grade and fill a portion of the site for ulti family development,
and construction of detention and pond are4spo property 'located at
intersection of Smith and Clark Streets, S uth 'r�ind or, Connecticut.
- on the plans dray b I Palm erg & Russo,
The o„rmit is based p �� Y g
entitled "General Plan of Development, " dated Aril 14, 1981; and
"Inland Vietlands" , dated April 1, 1981, roviseo April 13, 1981.
The following conditions must be adhered o for this permit to be
valid:
1. A Conservation Plan shall be submitte ,and approved by the
South Windsor Conservation Commis ionlprio to any construction.
This plan shall include the sequence O f events for seeding,
plantings, timing, etc. Also ero ion and sedimentation con-
trol measures to be employed during construction.
The proposal is subject to the a0rovca 1 of the Town Engineer.
The applicant shall indemnify and hol har mess the Town of
South Windsor against any liability W ich ight result from
the proposed operation or use.
4. The permit is valid for one %rear and J,,hall expire if not
exercised within that period.
Ver trul yo s,
I �L41 ND -1E AND AC►�NCY
TO-:'i•; OF S U1H '11I N DSS 0R
CE:c
CC: age 2.
vr&emo from
TOWN HALL
SOUTH WINDSOR, dONN. 06C 74
I ;
TO peter DeMallie ATE 8/3/81
D rector of Planning
S uth Windsor Town Hall
S uth Windsor, Conn. 06074
L --�
SUBJECT:T. Burr Meadow Condominium Project
Y
I have reviewed two Street names� subm' ted to m by
R y Alexander for the Burr Meador Con i mn um P oject.
T e names Misty Meadow Lane and Sprin Mea ow R ad are
a ceptable for this project. '.
NNIN ► Doi. �
Sp, �'�1N�S0R p� � � •
t
Wil iam R. Lanning I
Fix Mar_hal
EAT HARTFORD, CT 061 la DATE -- / ---_-_--_—._-
To Phone
644-2333
r--
-n
. . _ � .
i
n�• , -�
T 0_/?S
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WI DSOR. ONN. 06074
�tiaS0 .0 � AREA CODE 21 3/644 2511
August 6, 1981
Mr, Raymond J. Alexander
219 Griffin Road
South Windsor, Connecticut
r D a Alexander:
e
i
I have received your plans of solid waste storage and -, emoval for the
proposed Burr Meadow Condominium Project.
i
I am in agreement with your plan considerations in tha individual
units are preferable to several large units for the reasons you have
stated, and I fully approve of the plan considerations ,
Very truly ours
TOWN OF SO H WI�TDSOR
I
Robert Dept a, anita ian
RD/m
cc: veeter R. DeMallie, Director of Planning
Marshall Montana, Planning and Zoning Commis ion hair person
' I
I
i
i
,
1
D
'=urr I~'. adow As snciat.es
Ra.,jmond Ale. anger -S
EP
-1 9 Griffin Road
mouth ' indsor, Connecticut 06074 SpR PLANNING DEPT•
S0. IND
Y . Marshall T,:ontana, Chairperson
}'lanni g and Zoning Commission
1 r!�0 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
`'eptem er 25, 1981
Re : Burr Meadow Condominium, Compliance of .utu e design
c onsiderations .
i
Dear M4s . �"ontana,
Certain of ,the design considerations , as pr scri ,ed by the Elan-
ning arid Zoning Regulations, cannot be logicallyidemonstr,,jteO
within the context of the Site Plan/Special Exce ticn P pplicaticn
documentation. This letter is to define thbse c nsiderations and
indica e our awareness of, and intent to meet erexceed the stand-
ards s t by them.
The considerations addressed are :
4.6.4. . E. Noise Control will be depigned to m' et some of the
highest standards in the , industry today. All walls ,
ceilings or floors contiguous to adjacent dwelling
units shall have a minimum STC ati g of 45. Please
note that all units have , private me ins of egress ,
thus no common entries ekist.
4.6.4. F. Shock Mounting requirements will be coordinated
between the Building Cfficial and t e Project Fech-
anical Engineer.
4.6.4. I . Handicapped Access has been conside' ed and designed
into the project. Four units have een designated
for handicapped modification in acc rdance with the
provisions of the Connecticut Basic Ruilding Code.
4.6.4. K. Building Insulation shall meet Dr e teed the thermal.
provisions of this paragraph arid th requirements
of the Connecticut BaSic 'Buildipg C de. Insulation
used in sound control systems may v ry from the
material implied in this paragraph i.e, fiberglass
batts) , however, the resulting yst m will attain
the required rating.
i
i
4.6.4.5. C., Utilities . The proposed project is serviced br, the
required operating public utilities,.
A. Water is provided by ,the Mebrop�)litan District
Water Bureau.
1 . The fire protection sy tem will be privately
owned but maintained th FIDC on an annual
fee basis paid by the owne -. This is in
accordance with the Y : po icy.
2. Domestic water will be sinl.le metered at the
property line. Water chares will be paid by
the owner. Water service ill be provided
from the domestic mainvia individual unit
lines with exte for shut o fs (curb box) .
B. Electricity P Y is provided b he onne t;icut LiFrht.
and Power Company. Unitc will e i divi ually met:erecl .
To the extent that one can cont of tuch iatter'Q , the
meters will be located i mech ica ly and aestheLicall,4
pleasing locations . Ele trici wi 1 be utilized for
domestic hot water, cook ng and hea ing, ventilating
and air conditioning via 'heat 4.Aimpsj,
C. 'telephone and cable television will be provided
to the units on an individual basisland metered
accordingly.
4.6.4 4. G. Prohibited parking shall be pr cri ed in the Assn-
ciation Rules when they are drawn. The owner shall
limit the number and size of commercial ehicles that
may be parked on the site by unit owners,
Very uly� yours ,
II I
Raymo 4,.xander
I i
I
I I I
I
I
Burr Meadow Associates I
,"taymor d Alexander
�19 Griffin Road
ri
South iWindlsor, Connecticut 06074
IV!s. Marshall Montana, Chairperson
Planning atnd Zoning Commission
1540 ulli}van Avenue
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
September 25, 1981 j
Re : urr 'Meadow Condominium, Zone Change lan � s. lite Plan`
pedal Exception
I
Dear Ms. Montana,
i
With few exceptions, this project has rem 'nedjcons stant with
the p an resented for the zone change. The p1 n has been refined
techn cal Y to reflect the concerns of the Cormission and its
staff
The m)st prominent difference betwee the two lans is the unit
mix. The revised mix falls within t e re ire ratios thus
gomplying with the regulations.
- UNIT MIX -
Townhouse FT
lat Loft Total
2 B 2 Br 1 Br
Zone Change Plan 20 24 14 98
Special Exception/Site Plan 40 26 0 98
The miix r vision was necessitated b our inabi3ity o satisfactorily
resolve tie projects external stora a requiremitnts. The revision
has not significantly impacted on tiuildin
e pla ' fo tpri t. We were
able to reduce the total number of s f om eleven (11 ) to
ten (10) . The garaging and storage remain inithe same physical
relationship to the unit as in the Zone Ch nge Plan. The need for
two of the free standing car barns as el ina ed b providing
more ;jgarajging adjacent to the unit. These rev;Lsions led to a
cleanjer, more simplified site plan.
Very �truly yours.
Raym d A'ilexande�r
1
i
Burr Meadow Associates
Raymond Alexander
219 Griffin Road
Sout Winldsor, Connecticut 06074
Ms. Marshall Montana, Chairperson
Planning And Zoning Commission
a
1540 Sullivan Avenue
Sout Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Sept mber', 259 1981
i
Re : Burrl Meadow Condominium, Propo ed plwatin4schedule
Dear IIMs. (Montana,
We a e proposing to complete the si a plan ing in a dordance
with the ,schedule below.
AREA C MPLE ION TIME
Road fronjtage at Clark Street prig planting
and mith� Street I�-Deason 1982
Buil ing61 and 2,planting areas 13pring 1982
i
Buffer area contiguous to CinnamonI. all planting
Spri gs a�d Russo property eas n 1982
Buil ings'I 9 and 10, planting areas all 1982
East ern boundry buffer prig 1983
Buildings 7 and 8, planting areas Ppring 1983
I
Buildings' 5 and 6, planting areas all 1983
Buil ings, 3and • Planting areas Pri g1984
Entry ar:odded,
s at units completed during non.-plan ing seasons
will be except during periods whe the ground is
unworkablle.
Y
I
Ver trul
Y Yl ours
,
Raymond A exander
I
i
lla�
pw M E,
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOOT IND OR. C NN. 06074
�soR•c �'
�REA COE 203 644-2 11
I
' I
September 30� 1981
i
Ms. Melanie M. Cunningham, Pres.
Cinnamon Springs Condominium Association
11 0-llt6 Pleasant Valley Road
So th Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Ms.I Cunningham:
T k u for your letter dated August 26th, ar ple se ac ept
ou apologies for the delay in replying
j
Th s ma-}ter was discussed at length at our meet ng In-made
st night and
al hough we understand your concerns we do not eelt should be the
re ponstbility of this Commission to hie a h olost to study
th water systems that feed the pond si ce it apond located
on priv4te property.
However, we would encourage you to contact the boil nd Water
Conservation District directly, to see vhether, .his s a matter they
wish tolexplore for you. Their office is located at 340 Broad Street,
Wi dsoro Ct. 06095, phone 688-4945. Mri Vern ders n is the Director.
(Yours ry t uly,
PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
i
vg' By•
• Ma hall Montana, Chairperson
CC# J. �Page, Town Engineer /
P. DeMallie Director of Planning
i
I, 1
I
i
i
IVEDR C
T
October 5, 1981 OC
Sp. IND�U PUNNING DEFT,
Mrs. Marshall Montane
Chairperson, Planning and Zoning Commission
Town ,of South Windsor
Town Hal l
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re: Burr Meadow
Dear Mrs. 'Montana:
Mr. PeMallie, in a review of our submittal dated ogus 11 , 1981, raised some
questions) regarding that submittal, and at a meeting w th h1i n today, we dis-
cussed the following:
1 . Area of outside storage for units - A)though'lnot d mensi ned, the area for
storage at all units not serviced by garages will be g oss area of 60 sq. fe t,
dimensions 5'-0" x 12'-011• The dimensions of the' garag, s will be 1210" x 2010".
2. Unit No. 310 - East end wall will have no w it aws due t proximity of the
neighboring building to meet zoning requirement re i ement of bui ding separation d is tanc .
3. The car barns shown on site plan are the same, desii n as the garages in
front of the units.
4. Please note that the typical elevatlo�Iyouts
s on dIrrwingl A-6 take in all thr
unit types, and that the other building 1 are indicated on drawing K-2.
Bu i i d,ing A that Is drawn, Dhows all cpnd I t ionls ev though they go tog th r
1 in buildings B and C. This ill gi q variety i building types
d If�erent, y 9
conditions also chap a the look of builds gs because of
and �s i zed. Grade 9
change of floor elevations.
Should the project receive approval , ,the abo a will be of lected In the
drab ings submitted for a building permit and on any t anspa encies requir d
at filing of documents.
if you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me.
S erel
Ja M. ra "-
A.
J �bcd
cc:! Mr. � P ter DeMa i l i e, 01r. of P 1 ann i n$
Mr. , Raymond A l stand r
EnwronmentwManageTmt. 0upse r89 Inc*
165 Oak Ridge / Berlin,CT 060V 20 828- 787 0
t
I GROUND WA.tER ST Y
I
i
i
i BURR MEADOW PR0 CT
SOUTH. WIN SOR, CT i
I
I
� I
I
i
submit ed b Dr. Charles Dimmick
CErti0ed Professional Geologist
October 9 , 198
Eriv r nm tat
Evuiu tio"
Iflater soua ces
Land Use
Impact Statements
Pre-plan"irig 1 �-'-
STUDY
GROUND
ADO�WATER
Pk JECT I --
BURR ME
SOUTH WINDSORY CT.
f E•almber � and +sso Su ve�ors ar+d
F ROCEDUF
,E` At the request O r,vest' Gat Present and rt�3
EnG inee s gloomf field Ct. EMC In+c• eadows Froze
�rouect d f
+.t�tTe Groundwater conditio gs on inn Cinnamon prinGs Associateon
S . s youth �lir+dsor , and the adJ ee
Smith
Be ides r+ o -sit ir�s�ectlon� t
�ro�ert on, Pleasant Valle, lied:
f of l owi iG d�►c'-'Hants wer e �387469'470
A• OC_M�aPsof Nos•E,. o
i I$urve�, Hartford Coy+nt9: t• : 1 Oct. , 19819
,Meadows Associates Site Plan S1 rev se
C. E#urr 30 qec. 1980,
in.,=40 ft.
err 'meadows Observation Pit L ratio Mal s
D. �-
7ink=40 fto relat onshi between Pond at Cinnamon
E. surr Meadow Plan showinG �3 Aster ' 1�r 1 Sly 1 1
�riOiGs and Exist Onsite Po +d' in the
veld merit f a ,PerM neat Lake t e
F.
epot't, 1972, entitled De nne ticu for the
eichtner Propert�v Soy.+ hfornClose� er+s ns► a �d Millers
eal`t� Company, prepare
IWeth',ersf ield: Ct• olati r+ Tes qat f 12/�/S0 for Burr
' on Pit and Perc d , 8 oomfieldf Ct.
r G, Obse+rvatl
eaciow yre�ared b� PalmberG-ar d P�'s r,di--
M r, s'te in ect,'or+ a �re�ared a con
our
above doc�.+ments! plus o g-weather co
From he a Ground-water tab a far norm 1 d
the General
_ r f ow directions and
maw o
�! also calculated ProbabfeIjdorau is ondu tivit9 �k) for
{i Lions The assumed coefficient oh el in es/ ours based on Sous
rates�.
+ ' 1 or, site was taVyen, to
the subsoil stiMates: on-�ite nspe tior+ and �revi
i Service a measurements were n Ma e: s actual values
Conservation
r e;;perier+co. Ir+-situd 8einches/hog+r. -
Hag a between an
t 1' wen than the surface +
0NC USI HS• s about 6 f rid+► and about
C he 0eneral water 'table i d near the si of the Po Burr Meadows
1• pond on the B
f the Cinnamon Sir inGs °r' he existi6
et below the surface of al ate table is toward theiriotttie
wo a of the Ge ter movement is
ror�Ort�. The sloe f water
Estim ted rite
t a, 1.3% Gradient +/-• T is water able intersects theeetr�
+eiG +borhood of �. it+ch/day•
� ace ditch alonG th sou h si a of M�
�faee! in the drain
it Gs As cia ion ropert9 is' held
The pond on the Cinnamon SPrw ter t le:! which is or+1� sliGhtl�
I�,+r. � ar, artificial per wa er table.
� fluctuations in the G sera
ir+f +aenced b� -fl
Burr Meadows pr' per 9 is alsrelation�to
3. The er:istinG Pond on the B
at .east �art1el
1� b� a Perched wat r t ble r with no
r
the' Cinnamon -Spr-inGs s9ste.M.
f I
1 i
! I i
4. Groundwater levels in the vicini w of the 6--in h Pipe running
north irom the Cinnamon SprinGs roper w aF Pro-xd.Mate the flow line
of the pipe. It is likely that he sr vel fill d ditch in which
the Pine lies is a major control of sr and ater levels in th
vi init9. In the area just port of e C nnam n SprinGs Propertu
wa er Was observed enterinG the round just below the swipe: while
the Pipe itself was drw. .
5. Th Planned installation of new Pipe ' 11 r iot m ke anw measurable
ch nGe l in the Groundwater levels) near the inns on SprinGs Propert,�§.
Ho eve# , the seasonal hiGh water levels in the iortheastern Part of
the Burr Meadows Propertw maw be lows d s Gnif' cantles.
6. Rel esiOn of the existinG Pond on the Eurr eado s Proswertu into
a etei`It i on basin will remove th ex i 5
i nG 1 oca Perched water
to le. The detention area will iost 3 keli be rw Most of the -time.
This will have no effect on the Pinnam n S rinG Property.
PREPARED FOR MC S, Inc.
by
lie
Dr. Charles . D MMic
Certified Profess onal Geologist
October) 9 P ISPI31
i
i
Fx 14 / ,C3I7-
- .
lv$�
w
�° A^`
C � .
• �� 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOU H WIN SOR, CONN. 06074
�tioSOR. o�� AREA C DE 20!3/644-12511
i
Decembe 151, 1981 ,
i
Mr. IRaymolnd J. Alexander '
219 I,Griftin Road N I P®00 1✓
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Sir
Re: App. #835 - Burr Mead s Cond ini s
l Special Exception and ite Plan
Pie se be advised that the Planning and 'Zoning 3Dmmis ion voted to approve
your application for a special exception and si plai of development for
property ,located on the southeast corner of Smi Str et and Clark Street,
consisting of 15.8 acres, as shown on plans prep red 3y Pa mberg& Russo,
dated Au 'ust 15, 1981, revised to 10/2/8 and 1 4/81 consisting of 17
pages, aid on plans prepared by Design Group One, Arc itec s, dated
August 1 , 1981, entitled Pro j. No. 2381 sub je�C to he following
con itio s:
1. This ,,approval is for 98 multi-familyldwelli units; however, building
I�perm�ts and certificates of occupanc will issued initially for 40 -7T
unit located in Buildings No. 1, 2,y9 and W. is first phase shall
g17a
lso',include construction of all int rior r ds al d pa hways and sidewalks
�1-�ANV �showo in Phase I, as well as install tion o util'ties and all recreation
areas. All work shall be in accordance wit the Koning Regulations and
Buil4ing Department procedures.
No building permits or certificates iof occupancy ill tie issued for
subsequent phases until all site impfroveme is in hase I have been
icompieted and inspected by this Com
'ssion, the Town Engineer and
r ; � iBuil$ing Official, for the purpose o certifying that all construction
� in Phase I is in accordance with the approved site plan in all respects,
inciuding the construction of the utilities,, roa4s and amenities as
�required therein.
2. A re ised landscaping and buffering plan sl 11 b sub tted to the Commission
for Zroval, and shall include buffering along Smith Street. The
Commission reserves the right to modify the approved landscaping plan if
a field inspection indicates buffering regn'reme is have not been
adequately met.
3. The architectural plans shall be modified c ref ect the changes outlined
in the October 5, 1981 letter from Jack M. rafj ck of Design Group One,
Architects.
I
' I
I
Raymond J. Alexander -2- 12/15/81
40 �he site plans shall be modified as follows:
. 1196 parking spots must be shown in acco dance ith the revision
of Sheet K2 dated December 4, 19 1;
Dumpsters must be shown in accordance with th revision of Sheet K2
dated December 4, 1981;
D'lump sters must be screened by Ca adian mloc s, at least four feet
(4') in height, and shall be ere ted on concrite pails.
d. B'us shelters for school Ochildren must e provided.
ale. Exterior lighting shall be shown in the recreAtional areas.
f. Iron pins and corner lot markers must be show .
g. Detention basins, berms and buff r areas must be sh wn on the plot
plans.
h. The data block shall be amended to indicate the correct number of
parking spaces and percentage of lot coverage. aM�
5. IA drainage assessment fee in the amo nt -of 9000l shallbe paid to the
�
(Town �of South Windsor.
6. 'All knits shall be connected to the own of outh Windsor Sanitary
,Sewer System, subject to approval by the Se� r Colmnission and Connecti-
icut Department of Environmental Prot ction.l
7. IWater shall be supplied to all units by the Metro.olitan District
Conu4ssion.
r
8. lDraiftage shall be subject to the app oval of the own Engineer.
9. IIf, for any reason, finished grading and otier site work is not completed,
Ithe town Engineer shall determine the amoun of a cash bond to ensure
' final grading and site work. This c sh bo sha be submitted prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of �ccupa c
i
10. ,This approval is subject to approval by they own of South Windsor Inland
Wetlands Agency. j
11. 1A li bility insurance policy naming he T of South Windsor as an
insu ed, and satisfactory to the T Attorney, all a submitted in the
� amou is of not less than $250,000 per pers , $5 0,000 per occurrence
and 100 000 property damage.
bod i� y injury, $ , P P I �
i
i
r
Raymond ,7, Alexander -3- '�� 12/15/81
12. 1 Surety bonds in the following amounts shall be submit ed to the Town of
South Windsor to ensure completion of all pro meet :
$. For the completion of the roads and ark' g $100,000
For the completion of drains a and ads 2002000
For the completion of the sa itary sewer 60,000
4. For the completion of recrea ion fa flit' s 100,000
For the completion of plants gs and buffering 502000
i
i
$510,000
i
13. I Copies of sheets Kl, K2, S1, L12 L22 L3, L4 and 5, reproduced on
black and white transparent polyester film, along with three paper
prints, must be submitted to this C mmissi to a stamped and
signed. This approval letter as we 1 as t approval letter of the
Inland Wetlands Agency must be repr duced a the myla s.
After the mylars have been stamped and sig d b the omission,
they will be returned to you for fi ing in he ToFwn C erk's office.
These plans must be filed within 90 days of the late f approval
(bylMarch 8, 1982).
ours very t aly,
LAMING AND ZONING CONMISSION
v —
g BY
Mars 11 MOntana, Chairperson
CC: J. Page, Town Engineer
T. O'Auria, Building Official
B. $samara, Assessor
P. OeMallie, Director of Planning
Sewer Commission
Inland Wetlands Agency
I �
gUAA 02�
'I-_-�- '31_dO BRIEN AND IGGIN
`
ATTORNEYS AT, LAW
599 MAIN STREET
MANCHESTER, CONN•EC ICUT 06 040
KEVIN M.O'BRIEN AREA CODE 203
JAMES M.HIGGINS,JR. 646-3500
i
-� Ig-'a- G r ch 12, 19 8 2
3a I �
q- .
M ' . Marshall Montana, Chairperso
Planning and Zoning Commission
T F440
of South Windsor , J� G1 Sullivan Avenue
Sh ',Windsor, Connecticut 06074'
R urr Meadow Condominium
D ar Ms . Montana:
n accordance with your instructs ns , I enclose
herewith the following:
1. Two maps showing in detail t e changes that
w are requesting in the phasin of this p ojec .
2 . An attachment containin the prop sed modifi-
cations in the bond.
With regard to the two maps , youl ill note that they
are color-coded. The color redl,indic es base I; the
color ', green indicates Phase II; and the color yellow in-
dicates Phase III. These maps have been r view d by both
the Town Planner and the Town E ginee
With regard to the modifications in t e bond, please
note that there is no reduction in thetot 1 am unt, but
only an adjustment to reflect the phasing f development.
The proposed adjustment has also beenilevii ed y both the
To-om �lanner and the Town Engineer.
It is my understanding that the will be
reviewing this proposal on Tuesday M ch 3 , 1 at
8 : 00 ,m. I will be present with Ray ex n er to explain
the proposal and answer any que tions he orruni sion may
have .
i
'hank you for your attention to t his iatter.
RECEIVED
Vera trul yours ,
_
Kevin M. 0,'Eri n
SO. WINDSOR PLANNING DEPT&
Enclosures
BONDING MODIFICATION PROPOSAL:
BURR MEADOW CONDOMINIUM
Phase I Phase II Phase III
(Red) (Green) (Yellow) Total
A. Parking and Roads 33 ,000 33 , 000 342000 100,000
B. Drainage (etc. ) 100,000 501000 50,000 2009000
C. Sewers (etc. ) _ 302000 15 ,000 15 ,000 60,000
D. Recreational (etc) 40,000 30 ,000 30,000 1002000
E. Planting and
Buffering 252000 12 ,500 12,500 50,000
TOTALS 2282000 140,500 141,500 510,000
u
SO-4 t 'V,44-Qt
T-awf-L 0-/?
1540 SULLIVAN AVEN E SOUTH WIN DSOR, CONN. 06074
fties0 _co�� AREA DE 2 3/644 2511
rch 2 , 19
Kevin M� O'Brien, Esq.
599 Maim Street
Manchester, Connecticut 06040
Dear Sir: I
Re: Burr Meadow Cond iniums (App. #835
Please a advised that the Planning and Zoning "4ommission voted last
night t amend its approval letter dated DecembBr 15, 1981, in the
above matter, as follows:
The first paragraph in item #1 will nowlread as fol ws:
1. ,This approval is for 98 multi- mily d lling uni s; however,
,building permits and certificat s of o 0
upan y wi 1 be issued
initially for 32 units located 'n Buil ngs Nos. , 2 and 7.
'This first phase shall also inc ude co tru ion f all
interior roads and pathways andlisidewa s sb n i Phase I, as
well as installation of utiliti s and ai 1 r rest on areas.
All work shall be in accordance with ZD ing legul tions and Build-
ing Department procedures.
Item #5 is amended to read as follows.
5. A drainage assessment fee in th amount of $ ,600 shall be paid
to the Town of South Windsor.
I li
Item #1� is amended to read as follows:
I
12. ,Surety bonds in the following a unts shall a submitted to
,the Town of South Windsor to en ure co let n of improvements
in Phase I as follows:
ia. For the completion of the roads and parking $ 339000
b. For the completion of drai ge and rad' g 1002000
�c. For the completion of the s nitary ewe 309000
d. For the completion of recre tion f ili 'es 502000
e. For the completion of plant ngs an buff ring 25,000
Toth $238.9000
,
4
I I
Kevin M. O'Brien, Esq. -2- 3/24/82
The plans must be modified to show the phasing of this development as
outlined to the Commission on March 23, 1982, and three prints of the
revised plans should be submitted to the Commission.
All other terms and conditions contained in the approval letter dated .
December 15, 1981 will remain in full force and effect.
This letter, as well as the approval letter dated December 15th, must
be reproduced on the mylars before the final plans are stamped and
signed by the Commission for filing.
Yours very truly,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
vg By:
Marshall Montana, Chairperson
CC: J. Page, Town Engineer
P. DeMallie, Planning Director
T. D'Auria, Building Official
B. McNamara, Assessor
Sewer Commission
Inland Wetlands Agency
4 STATE OF C ONNE TIC'Cu �
� 1
4 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMEN L RO ECTION
March 259 11982
I i I
Town of South Windsor
Water Pollution Control Authority
Town Hall
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Dear Members:
We have been in contact with representatives of Bu r Meadows Associates
regarding their submission of an application for a perm t to discharge domestic
sewage to the municipal sewerage system in the Tod of outh Windsor.
A "community sewerage system" as defined in Section7-2 5 of the Connecticut
Genera a,tutes is propose .
The application for a permit to discharge wi be tonsidered by the
Commissioner. If it is determined that the discha ge will not cause
pollution, the design of the system will be review d by Department staff.
If the design of the system is adequate and all n essay documentation
(as specified below) has been submitted, the desi n wil be approved and
constructioin authorized. This approval an autho zati n to construct
is not superior to any authority vested wi h the nici alit .
Sectioln 7-246(b) of the Connecticut General atut s (P -78-154)
requires almunicipality to manage or ensure the a ecti a management of
any communi'lty sewerage system not owned by the mu cipa ity. Before any
APPROVAL required under Section 25-26 or S ction -54i of the Connecticut
General Statutes is issued for a disposal acilit whic constitutes a
community sewerage system not owned by a municipa ty, verified statement
by a duly a',uthorized municipal official must be filed s .atinc that the munipal
water pollution control authority shall manage or !nsura the effective
management bf the system. A copy of any d cument ion f co tractual
or other arrangements concluded between the munic' al w ter pollution
control aut'hority and the owner of the community wera a system or other
interested persons or municipalities shall be fil J witi saic verified
statement. Such documentation shall be ac�ompani J by a certification
from the legal representative of the municipal wa r po luti n control
authority that said documents are legally $ufficieit.
It will be the responsibility of the pplica to 'ansure that the
required documents are filed. If you have, any quastion3 regarding this matter,
please contact the writer (566-3245) .
A'ary truly ours,
i
Rob rt E. 1 ore
REM/WLW/lrm Director
Water Comp?ianc Unit
cc: Burr Meadows Associates
Palmber & Russo
Town of South Windsor
State Office Building, Hartford, Connecticut 0115
An Equal Opportunity Employer
It t4c
~ Tiawt-1 0-le S,0�
•
c �
k c 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUT WIN SOR, C NN. 06074
�tioso� o�� AREA C9 E 20 /644.2 11
April 13, 11982
Burr Meadow Associates
c/o Raymond J. Alexander
219 Griffin Road
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 CERT IED �MAIL
Dear Sir:
At the April 129 1982 meeting, the South Windsor Inland Wetlands
Agency granted a one-year extension for your Ap lica ion NO. 1?? for
property located on Smith and Clark Streets South W ndsor,
Connecticut.
This extension becomes effective on April 0, 1 82 (the original
expiration date of your permit) and is valid th ough April 20, 1983.
Enclo',sed is your receipt for the extern ioni fee.
Very truly ) our ,
Constance Eriks on, Chairman
INLAND WET DS AGENCY
TOWN OF SO x w NDSOR
CE:chm
CC: A. Bowen Davies, Deputy Town Engineer,
Marshall Montana, Chairman, PZC
Charles Enes, Town Clerk
Th ma's D'Auria, Building Inspector
eter De Malli e, Director of Planning'I
W N S6 I
A
H T-awn, �soulA U C
w 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE' - SOUTH WIND OR. C NN. 06074
R•C
!AREA CO E 20 644-2 11
JulyI, 28 , 1�82
Kevin M. 0 Brien, Esq .
599 Main St .
Manchester , Ct . 06040
Dear Mr . O ' Brien:
Rile : App . #835 - Burr Meadow Cond ini ms
i
Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
last night to reduce the bond requirements from $23 , 000 to
$100 , 000 wlhich will cover completion 'lof roads aI d p rking ,
drainage and grading, sanitary sewers , recreation facilities ,
and plantings and buffering .
The Commission also approved acceptance of a Lejter of Credit
in lieu of a surety bond, subject to appro1val ollf the Town
Attorney .
Before the final plans can be filed a mus hav a _letter _ _p � from
the Town Attorney stating the Letter ' 0 Cr dit ' s approved , as
well as th,e origin a er"o cre . `-` ite__"i `-`a o due the
Town of South Windsor the sum of $1, 600 for a di ain ge assessment
fee .
Yours veryl, trul ,
PLANNING AIND ZONING COMMISSION
vg By :
Louise E ans Vice-Chair rson
CC . P . De'Mallie , Planning Director
Wayne C. Gerlt , Esq .
cowC�
di
"
c�
1Z
y _
• I 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUT WIN OR. C NN. 06074
0e•C �'� AREA C E 00 /644.2 11
April 013 983
Burr Meadow ,Associates
j
c/o Raymond J. Alexander, General Partner
P. 0. Box 53
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074 CERTIFTED 14AIL
Dear Mr. Alexander:
I,
At the April 11, 1983 meeting, the South Wi dsor Inland Wetlands
Agency approved with conditions your Application N0. 226 to regrade
and fill portions of the site for development of j mult -family housing
and the construction of storm water detention arias f r property lo-
cated at the southeast corner of the intersqctioi of mith and Clark
Street, South Windsor, Connecticut.
The permit is based on the plans entitled " sitePlan, " S 1. ,
dated 8/15/81; revised 10/2/81, 1/22/ 2, 2/l /82 and /19/82; and
"Conservation Plan, " S 6. , dated 8/15 81; revise 10/ /81 and 1/22/82;
Burr Meadow ,Associates, 1665 Ellington Road, Sou h Windsor, Connecticut,
drawn by Palmberg & Russo, Land Survey ors & rofissioiial Engineers.
The following conditions must be adhered to for his permit
to be valids
1. The Conservation Plan shall be followed. As the planting
season is upon us, the disturbed areas hall be seeded and
stabilized as soon as possible.
2. Filling, as stated in the application, ihall be essentially
relocation of material with no nett ncr ase of quantity of
soil on the site.
3. The proposal is subject to t�e app� val of the
Tov'n Engineer.
4. The applicant shall indemnify and h� ld arml ss the
Town of South Windsor against any 1 abi ity which might
Burr Meadow Associates
c/o Raymond J. Alexander, General Partner
P. 0. Box 583
South Windsor, Connecticut 06074
Letter of Permit - Application NO. 226
April 13, 1983
Page 2.
result from the proposed operation or use.
5. The permit is valid for one year and shall expire if not
initiated and completed within one year from the date of
approval.
Ver truly yours,
stance Erikss , Chairman
INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY
TOWN OF SOUTH WINDSOR
CE:c hm
cc: Joseph Russo, Palmberg & Russo
A. B. Davies, Deputy Town Engineer
Richard J. Sartor, Town Manager
Edward F. Havens, Mayor
Charles Enes, Town Clerk
Marshall Montana, Chairperson, PZC
Th as D'Auria, Building Official
Peter De Mallie, Director pf Planning
Richar Ryan, Town Council Liaison
Peter Bortolan, Chairman, EDC
BURR MEADOW ASSOCII ATES
P. O. Box W
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
i
i
May 19, 1983
Ms. Marshall Montana, Chairperson
Planning & Zoning Commission
Town of South Windsor j
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Ct. 06074 j
Re: Burr Me ow Condominium
Phase 2 Authorization
Dear Ms. Montana:
Burr Meadow Associates is requesting authorization, by Your C mmiss'on, to
proceed with the development and construction of Phase 2 of he ref renced
condominium. Phase 1 is nearing completion and we have a feliff of t e units
occupied. We are planning to close the permanent mortgages n fift percent of
the first phase in mid-June. We are presently holdingnon-bin ng reservations
on a number of the units in phase 2.
Owing to the unusually wet weather, we are experiencing some delay in the
landscaping and construction of our pool and tennis cou . W have contracted
with Kashota Farms, Inc. to do our landscaping and they assu d us hat they
will be able to provide the required material, if not somewhat elaye Our
swimming pool has been contracted for. Although State ppro als ar pending,
Aqua Pool,' has been given permission to proceed. The 'It nnis ourt i scheduled
for completion within the next thirty days.
We have discussed the matter of the bond for the seco pha a with the Town
Engineer. We are requesting that the existing S100,00 0 security bond not be
reduced for work completed in Phase 1, rather let the ond remain in force to
cover the work required in Phase 2.
Our experience with the first thirty-two (32) units has caused iis to rethink our
unit design. We are considering a larger single level, two bedroom unit to
replace a dumber our our two bedroom town house units. The empty nester market
is looking 'for no stairs and more space than our smaller two edroorr unit
provides.
Very truly ours,
Raymond J. A xantoer
I r
P
low
a
�v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WINO OR, C NN. 06074
OR C AREA CO E 203 644-2 11
I
I
May 31, 1013 3
I
Mr. Raymond J. Alexander
Burr Meadow Associates
P. 0. Box 583
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Sir:
Re: App. #835 - Burr Meadow CoI dom' nium
Phase II
I
Please be advised that the Planning and Zor 'ng ommi sion voted
on May 24th to approve Phase II of Burr Meadow ondo iniums
consisting of 32 units located in Building #8, 9 an 10, as
shown on plans prepared by Palmberg & Russ ,, dated 8 15/81,
revised to 12/4/82, entitled Proj . No. 23811, su ject to the
following modifications:
1. The plans shall be modified to show the cor4ect size of the
buildings.
2. The $100, 000 bond currently being held ) y t is Commission shall
be amended to indicate that Phase II, well as Phase I, of
this development is covered by said bo
3. No certificates of occupancy will be i uedifor any units in
Phase II until all major recreational faCili.ties are completed
subject to this Commission' s approval. ,
4. The revised plans showing Phase II must be teproduced on mylars
and submitted to this Commission to be tam ed and signed and
filed inthe Town Clerk' s Office. This ett r of approval must
be reproduced on said plans before filing same.
Yours very t uly,
PLANNINGr & Z NING COMMISSION
vg By:
Mars 1 onta a, Chairpe s
CC: T. D'Auria, Building Official
B. MacNamara, Assessor
J. Page, Town Engineer
P. DeMallie, Planning Director
i 1
�O�N ,e44
~ Tio 0-yes •
C �
wv 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WIND OR. C NN. 66074
��SOR•C
AREA CO CIE 203 644-2 11
June 6, 1583
Mr. Raymond J. Alexander
Burr Meadow Associates
P. 0. Box 583
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Sir:
Re: App. #835 - Burr Meadow Condominiums
Phase II
Please be advised that the approval letter of this conmission dated
May 31, 1983, is amended to include the following p agra h:
5. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of $a ,.600ishall be
submitted to the Town of South Windsor.
Yours ver truly,
P NG ZO G COMMISSION
vg By:
_)� z"
rsha Mon ana, Chairperson
CC: J. Page, Town Engineer
P. DeMallie, Planning Director
t
4,4�4/
tOVI
y
~ T-0 o-yeS )&U:
e �
u
�v 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH WIND OR. C NN. 06074
tip N� AREA COE 203 644-2 11
SOR•C
I
July 18 1983
Mr. Raymond J. Alexander
Burr Meadow Associates
P. 0. Box 583
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Mr. Alexander:
At a regular meeting of the Water Pollution Control ' utho ity held
on March 15, 1983, the following motion was ma :
i Mr. Peterson made a motion that conceptual appr val be
j given to Burr Meadows (Sketch Map dated 3 5/83) for
sanitary sewer construction, subject to ne tec nical
I approval of the Town Staff and that safegiardsi,
recommended by the Town Staff will be tak A so
that the Water Pollution Control Authorit willi be
provided with a better map. Mr. Gay secon ed the
motion. Motion unanimously carried.
Please comply with the request of the Water Po� ution Control Authority
and provide them with the map they requested. Thanki you for your
cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yO rs,
�eggy z, ^lerk
Water P llutij n Control Authority
M
r TOWN OF SOUTH WIND OR
CC: Mr. Jules E. Page, Town Engineer
. Mr, Peter De Mallie, Director of Plannin
Mrs. Marshall Montana, Chairperson, Planning & 'Zonin
t_
" rr
C = T-Own,
o-P slcw� ?'Z)". 1"14
s �
w 1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTI-1 WIND OR, C NN. 06074
SO co AREA CODE 2031/644-2 11
September' 28 , 111983
Mr . Raymond J . Alexander
Burr Meadow Condominiums
P . 0. Box 583
South Windsor , Ct. 06074
Dear Sir:
Re: App . #835 - Burr Meadow Coil omi iums
The Planning and ZoningCommission voted ast' n ' h, ig t to
approve the modified plan as shown on Sheet Pi prepared
by ,Palmberg & Russo, dated 8-4-83 .
Please prepare a mylar with this letter epro uced thereon
to be signed and filed in the Town Clerk s Office.
Yours ver tru y,
PLANNING AND Z NING CO !MISSION
v g B y:
a %s1hrd`l' Mojitana , Chairperson
� r
CC: P. DeMallie Planning Director V T. D 'Auria, Building Official
BURR MEADOW ASSOC $ A T S
P. O. Box 583
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Nov. 23, 1983
Mr. Robert F. Gilligan, Chairperson
Planning & Zoning Commission
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Re: ow Condominium
P �se 3 tho ization
Dear Mr. Gilligan:
Burr Meadow Associates requests that your cami sion consider this
matter during the public participation portion of Your ember 29,
1983 meeting. Burr Meadow Associates is r ting ' utho ization, by
your commission, to proceed with construction ,of footings and founda-
tions in Phase 3 of the referenced condominium. We ' ill proceed no
further than footings and foundations until the bon requirement has
been met and building permits issued.
We are making this request so that we can begin thelfound tion work
before the winter shut-down. This will enable us t better meet our
carmitments when the spring building season opens u ' .
Phase 2 is nearing substantial coripletion of t a erior . We are
closing on the first of the permanent mortgag in he second phase on
December 2. We are presently holding non-bi ng r erva ions on a
number of the units in Phase 3. We have compppll ,ted 4oth t e pool and
the tennis court and the majority of the site lant ng r ired by the
previous approvals.
Verb t ly ours,
-V
Raymor � er
cc /
P. DeMallie
R. Arsenault
T. D'Auria
c r T-au� � ?
c
a
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE - SOUTH IM INDS R, CO N. 06074
oe•co AREA CODE 203/ 44-251
Decembex 7 , 1983
Burr Meadow Associates
Mr. Raymond J. Alexander
P. 0. Box 583
South Windsor, Ct. 06074
Dear Sir:
Re: App. #835 - Burr Meadow Condq ini s
Phase III
Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
to approve Phase III of Burr Meadow Condominium; consisting of
34 units located in Buildings #3, 4 , 5 and 6 , a6 shown on plans
prepared by Palmberg & Russo, dated 8/15/81 Pr j . # 381,
subject to the following modifications:
1. The amount of a bond to ensure completion of improvements
will be determined at a later date.
2 . No building permits will be issued for Phas III,, until
the amount of the surety bond has been dete '-minel and the
bond has been submitted to this Commis on.
3. Applicant may proceed to install footings a d fo ndations
in Phase III, prior to submission of the su ety ond.
4. A drainage assessment fee in the amount of $1, 70 shall be
submitted to this Commission prior to the i suan a of
building permits.
Yours very truly,
PI;ANNIN AND ZONING COMMISSION
vg By:
4.t11Montana, Vice-Chair an
CC: R. Martel, Town Engineer
P. DeMallie, Planning Director
E. Belleville, Assessor
tow" sE�
c L
u
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE SOUTH WIND OR, C NN. 06074
soe•c��'� AREA CODE 203 644.2 11
May 23, 198'
Burr Meadow Associates
P . 0 . Box 583
South Windsor , Ct . 06074
Att : Raymond J. Alexander
Dear Ray :
Re : App . #835 - Burr Meadow Con omi iums
Phase III
The Planningand Zoning Commission voted 1 l g last n, ght to permit
you to modify the approved site plan for Phase , II as follows :
Building #3 and #4 will now have four 2-bath ranches ;
Building #5 will now have two 2-bath ranches .
Please submit a modified plan on a black and wh;' te mylar , which
will be stamped and signed by the Commission an filed in the
Town Clerk ' s Office .
Yours very trule ,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Atober
vg By :
F. Gi 1 'gan , ChaXkman
CC: P . DeMallie , Planning Director
R. Martel , Town Engineer
T . D ' Auria , Building Official
pow N aE,4
1540 SULLIVAN AVENUE • SOUTH WINDS R, CO N. 06074
AREA CODE 203 44.25 1 soR•co�
December 27 , 1985
Mr. Raymond J. Alexander
R. J. Alexander, Inc .
P.O. Box 654
South Windsor, CT 06074-0654
RE: BOND REDUCTION - BURR MEADOW$
Dear Ray.
On December 24 , 1985 , Peter DeMallie and I petfor ed an inspection of
Burr Meadows, Phase I , II , and III. Mr. DeMal lie Jnsp cted the land-
scaping while my responsibility concerned the ' con truc ed facilities .
Before I can recommend a reduction of the bona tola maintenance security,
the following items must be addressed:
1. All dumpsters must have a Portland cement concrete pad as per
the site plan.
2 . The 15" flared end pipe section to the nort�L and west of
Building #7 must be supplied a channel to D tent 'on Basin #1.
There is standing water in this section � due ' to the obstruction.
3 . Brush and debris must be removed around the ' stor water inlet
structure located to the south of Building 42 .
4 . Approximately 65 L.F. of 4 ' wide Portland c ment concrete
sidewalk must be installed on the south sid of Spring
Meadow Road, just east of Misty Meadow sane This walk must
include the appropriate inclines to tholexi ting pavement.
5 . An inclined concrete walkway must be instal ed o the westerly
side of Misty Meadow Lane, just south of Sping �eadow Road.
If you have any questions , please feel free to cal.1 me.
Very truly yours ,
Richard P. Martel =�
Town Engineer
gip. �N,SOR LANNIO DEFY
RPM:bmr
cc : Robert Arsenault, Director of Public Works
Peter DeMallie, Director of Planning
�U R R M E ADOW AS a I A�rF.-
P. 0. BOX 583
South Windsor, CT 016074
644-2333
06-Jun-86
Mr. Rick Martel
Town Engineer
Town of South Windsor
1540 Sullivan Avenue
South Windsor, CT 06074
Re : Burr Meadow Bond
Dear Mr . Martel .
This is to inform you that the items set forth for�icorrection, in
your December 27, 1985 letter have been comple ed . We trust that
the matter of the bond reduction for Burr Meadow may now go to the
Planning & Zoning Commission .
We are available if you have any questions con erning this matter.
t u1 ours)
,
�1e�y� �'
Raymo d J. lexa�nder
RJA/ iba
P. O. BOX 1776 SOUTH MAIN STREET EAST GRANBY ONNE�TICUT 0602-6
March 6, 1989
Mr . Raymond Ale
xander
exander
Burr Meadow Associates
P .O. Box 583
South Windsor, CT 06074
RE : Burr Meadow S
/ unfield Drive
Bond# K02421161 - Section I
Bond# K03009907 - Section II
Dear •
RaY-
As you can see by the attached letter, releases from the! Townof
South Windsor are in fact needed to cancel referenced bo ds.
Please proceed in obtaining these releases so we can finalize this
matter once and for all .
Sincerely,
RONCARI INDUSTRIES, INC. (RDC)
Lisa P. Buono
Administrative Assistant
Enclosure
HARTFORD (203) 527-1825
EAST GRANBY (203) 653-2524 WINDSOR LOCKS (203) 623 3B1 • SPRINGFIELD 1413) 737-3503
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FAH
(Oil N S f, Ole(
U1 r � • I
--)
�C�
s 1540 SULLIVAN '%VENUE • SOUTH WIN SOR, cONN. 06074
AREA CODE 2 3/644-�511
March 13, 1989
Mr. Raymond Alexander
J.F. I . Associates
P.O. Box 1061
South Windsor, CT 06074
Dear Mr. Alexander:
RE: Burr Meadow/Sunfield Drive
Bond # K02421161 - Section I
Bond # K03009907 - Section II
Please be advised that the maintenance b,pnds, whiclh were being
held for the above referenced project are n6 lon4er applicable.
They were released as of July 28, 1988 . If you should have any
further questions, please do not hesitate tol, call the Planning
Department.
Very Truly Yours,
Raymond F. Hallowell
Chairman of Planning And Zoning
cc: Marcia A. Banach, Director of PLanning,
PZC file